Vatican: humanity needs a world central bank and world government

61

The First and Second World Wars were started in order to build on the planet so-called. "New world order". For a number of reasons, especially in this, the role of Russia should be noted, then it did not happen.

But this does not mean that the bosses of the Western project will not try to repeat the implementation of their plan. The current global crisis only confirms this fact. The events that occur in the world, have the main goal to shake the foundations of the old world order and produce a "matrix overload". And as always, the construction of a new world goes through the crucible of world war.

In the 2001 year, the West began a war with a fragmented Islamic world, which from the stage of secular regimes, with a partly Social Democratic system, is thrown into the world of the non-Middle Ages. The countries are dividing, there is a consolidation of people along religious, national, territorial, tribal grounds. An example of the future of these countries before their eyes is Somalia, Iraq, now Libya.

After the “modernization” of the Islamic world, the turn of the post-Soviet republics will come, first of all the South Caucasus and Central Asia, then Ukraine and Belarus. At the same time, the impact will be on huge states-civilizations - Russia, India and China. All of them must be dismembered into fragments, which must survive new fragmentation, segmentation, and eventually merge into the New World Order.

We constantly see images of this order in Western films that program people to facilitate this process. This is true technofascism. The owners of this new world, who own TNK-TNB, will have access to the latest biotechnology technologies in private armies, becoming long-livers and demigods. Ordinary people will be limited in their rights, their numbers will decrease (perhaps radically). For most people, the education system will be drastically simplified (in the post-Soviet space and in the West, this process is already running). In many ways, this world will resemble society on the planet Tormans, which Ivan Antonovich Efremov described in his excellent socio-philosophical and science fiction novel The Hour of the Bull.

Some centers (central control points) of the Western world report this already in the open. So, Vatican, the ancient enemy of Russia, called for the creation of the World Bank and the institutions of "world government".

The Holy See preoccupied with the problem of the development of the global financial and economic crisis and in order to avoid further crises in the global economy, proposed to reform the global monetary and financial system and create an analogue of the world central bank. According to the Vatican, national structures do not cope with the crisis.

This information was contained in a dedicated special document prepared by the Pontifical Council of Justice and Peace. Catholic hierarchs believe that the world is facing the need to determine effective methods of coordination and control.

And do not think that this call has no power. The Vatican is one of the main centers of power in the Western world, and the oldest and most experienced. Possessing power and influence on more than 1,1 billion people. In addition, the "World Central Bank" will have enormous power over the world (this is actually a new Federal Reserve, only the world). It is not for nothing that the phrase attributed to Mayer Amschel Rothschild roams the net: “Let me release and manage the money of a nation, and I don’t care who creates its laws.” This phrase was put into circulation by Gertrude Margaret Coogan in the book Money Creators, published in the USA in 1935.

Financial management of the planet gives a huge power, there is already very close to the total control over people.

Moreover, in the opinion of the Vatican, the changes should have not only a financial and economic basis, but also, first of all, a political component. And it should consist in the creation of state institutions that guarantee the consistency and unity of jointly adopted decisions. There is already very close to the "world government."

In addition, the Council of Justice and Peace of the Catholic Church noted that cruel sentiments pose a danger to the countries of the world, which are growing and covering more and more people. The main reason for the numerous protests that have swept the world is financial and economic instability.

It should be noted that the Vatican is not alone in such appeals; more recently, the well-known financial speculator and billionaire George Soros called on the eurozone to create a single ministry of finance and a uniform tax policy. In his opinion, without this, the zone of the single currency (euro) simply cannot exist anymore. Soros also called for the establishment of a pan-European debt bond. And this will help in solving the debt problems of the European Union. Berlin and Paris reacted negatively to this idea, Angela Merkel and Nicolas Sarkozy considered that this step would lead to placing the entire debt burden of the monetary union on Germany and France (the strongest economies of the EU).
61 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. LESHA pancake
    +6
    26 October 2011 07: 34
    yeah, led by the Anglo-Saxons. Pindos will rule the whole world, about this possibility and Hitler with Napoleon dreamed.
  2. sirToad
    +6
    26 October 2011 07: 49
    horror again. although what to take from the Vatican? and Hitler was blessed and Nazi criminals were helped to hide, and during the Nuremberg trials they called for mercy and humility in relation to the defendants. As they say everything in line with. another thing is that you must wind it up!
    1. +5
      26 October 2011 08: 09
      Sir Toad, They voiced, in this case, the fact that the entire Yusovskaya “politician” has been advancing with a "sly" over the past fifteen years. Not out of nowhere there was talk of a gold "billion" and other shnyaga. Yusov's capital is eerily anti-human, because it is Zionist. Recently, he has grown so fat that, simply, he has lost the features of his mind. In general, you are right, the whole history of the Vatican has been hypocritical from time immemorial and this should be turned on its head.
      1. Sazhka
        +3
        26 October 2011 17: 38
        Massons however ...
  3. ESCANDER
    +9
    26 October 2011 08: 10
    Soon the Vatican will resume the Crusades. And so far, it has not been possible to teach other civilizations to the mind, because of the fact that they wanted to poop them.
  4. Mahamont
    +4
    26 October 2011 08: 20
    "The closer a person is to the church, the further he is from God" (Leo Tolstoy)
    1. sirToad
      +6
      26 October 2011 08: 35
      Lev Nikolaevich has a lot of controversial things - from the mere "non-resistance to evil by violence" turns his back on the soul, but you can't argue with that. or as my late great-grandmother used to say - "but God is not in the church! God is in the soul!" if he is in your soul, then you are a man, and if not, then no church will help you, even if you break your forehead and learn the entire psalter up and down.
  5. NUT
    NUT
    -2
    26 October 2011 09: 01
    along the way, we often found ourselves in that company (with which we do not drink) where the Jew hanged himself
    as for me it’s better to feast on your hog for your two penny ...
  6. Sergh
    -1
    26 October 2011 10: 19
    Yes, this is far from news! This is described in "Zeitgeist-1,2,3" or here is a general assembly, just about the role of the Vatican and what it is eaten with:

    http://vkontakte.ru/video-30955570_161048142
    1. Ion coaelung
      -1
      26 October 2011 10: 46
      This was news to me five years ago. Naturally, the Spirit of the time suggested, then compared the poor knowledge of history, a bunch of doc films. Conclusion: Satanists under the veil of "divine figures", slaves of lecithism and perversion. How do people get such callings from people?
  7. -2
    26 October 2011 10: 42
    Well done holy fathers! Hello to Brown Brown! lol Right now, he’ll write a couple more books. The Vatican constantly throws Temko ... am
  8. Alexey Prikazchikov
    -5
    26 October 2011 11: 03
    Ccuki would kill animals of all Catholics under a burden I hate Europeans I hate !!!!!!!! angry
    1. -2
      26 October 2011 16: 22
      you can ask why_
    2. -3
      26 October 2011 16: 44
      Heal a little and read the site rules once again.
  9. 0
    26 October 2011 11: 37
    Our liberals sometimes squeal about the fact that Russia does not invite the "great man" of the Pope. Here de, what our patriarchs, or whatever they are, are bad. Although I do not respect any church, I think this is the right decision, because the Vatican has ALWAYS been an enemy of Russia. The Church, in contrast to the country's leadership, although it understands and remembers.
  10. sirToad
    +2
    26 October 2011 11: 46
    where are we and where is the vatican? and with what fright should we invite him? we are heretics here. if our priests claim a certain universality and the correctness of the faith, they not only should not resist such an invitation but also refrain from contacts. and it seems that already the info skipped that already some kind of joint commission of the Catholic - Orthodox was invented. I don’t know = - true or not
  11. escobar
    -4
    26 October 2011 11: 47
    Globalization continues. And the scenario proposed by the Vatican or the like is simply inevitable. Droplets merge, the result: one ocean, one law. Another thing is what format the world government will have ......
    1. LESHA pancake
      0
      26 October 2011 11: 55
      we see the format of government in Libya.
  12. Max
    Max
    0
    26 October 2011 12: 00
    Also news to me. For a long time already we live with one center. bank in the states. We live according to their laws with all the consequences. They are good, and we, they have an ass - we have even more. Their deck of cards, and their croupier, and all other countries are only slaves (economically)
  13. dimarm74
    -2
    26 October 2011 14: 43
    the pope with a dirty paw crawls out of business ...
    and why only mom gave birth to such a dad ....
    1. LESHA pancake
      -2
      26 October 2011 15: 09
      THIS IS AS A SPIDER IN A BANK SITS IN A NARROW PLACE AND PITS THINGS THERE HERE THERE AND REAL PEOPLE DIE.
  14. zczczc
    0
    26 October 2011 15: 07
    Is there really little evidence on whose side Christianity is in principle ...
  15. -2
    26 October 2011 15: 33
    the opinion of these pedophiles from the Vatican is somehow not particularly interested.
  16. -1
    26 October 2011 16: 03
    Ha, interesting statements about the church: ZAO ROC or Catholics !!!! What a ... Levada center, here it is, the whole social. poll on the face! In Russia, about 4-7% of the worshipers of the Russian Orthodox Church, Islam, 40-50% think that they "believe", but the rest of the pagans, by the way, their number has been increasing lately))). Therefore, they go out and try to unite against us. My opinion
  17. karnics
    0
    26 October 2011 16: 05
    Do not happen to this ... We will erase this reptile into powder We are the descendants of ancient warriors ... We will not leave a trace from the Zionist reptile ... I BELIEVE this!
  18. lightforcer
    0
    26 October 2011 16: 25
    They announced it ahead of time.
  19. Motherland
    0
    26 October 2011 16: 45
    The Roman "pope" is no longer a representative of God, he is a pawn for pressure on mad church fanatics
    1. zczczc
      +5
      26 October 2011 16: 54
      Motherland, and name at least one representative of God? Obscurantism is pure water.
      People have a natural need to believe in God, bug-bugged people have a mind to satisfy this need - there is a demand, there is a commodity.

      Any person is a representative of God. And the better a person is, the more he is "like" God. True, the concept of "better" is subjective, but nevertheless, some general ideas about good and evil are the same for most peoples. However, not all. And it is these renegades, not knowing the essence of good and evil, and trying on the mantle of "representatives of God." Someone baptizes cars, someone drives sermons, someone knocks on parishioners to the authorities, and someone pushes the global government - the essence is the same: money and control at the expense of voluptuous lies. And what is significant - any state is only happy with the existence of this "spiritual organ", because easier to control the masses.
      1. Motherland
        0
        26 October 2011 17: 00
        totally agree
      2. sirToad
        0
        26 October 2011 17: 05
        this is correctly noticed.
        1. zczczc
          0
          26 October 2011 17: 58
          sirToad, yeah, "true believers" massively minus. This is where religious fanaticism is.

          How can one want independence from the dollar, from the USA and not want independence from Christianity?
          People, think with your head - everything is interconnected! One promotes the other.
          1. sirToad
            0
            26 October 2011 18: 06
            Yes, I somehow parallel their minuses. Well, I don't believe in the old man in the sky. I somehow prefer Russian cosmism. and the saying "man - it sounds proudly" and rassusolivaniya about slaves, even if I hate God.
            1. Motherland
              -1
              26 October 2011 18: 43
              oh yes I completely forgot from Europe and the USA the Catholic Church which is different from the Orthodox.
              1. +1
                29 October 2011 02: 54
                In Europe - the Catholic, and in the US - Protestant.
            2. zczczc
              +2
              26 October 2011 18: 49
              sirToad, no, I believe in God. I just know for sure that he is not what he was called by at least one people on earth. God, like a certain force, of course is.

              I can even explain how it manifests itself - God is the one who controls the probability of events. I personally had so much on this topic that it's impossible not to believe. Maybe God just helps to tune in to a certain "wave" of more accurate perception (in order to reduce one's own probability of failure in a particular situation), and may also limit access to this "wave". I am also sure that the right to use this "wave" is the more likely, the less often I went against my conscience. Living in good faith, it seems, and the truth gives an expanded understanding of the essence of things and events.

              Thus, it turns out that even if you cannot read, you have an internal organ that compares any of your actions with the rules of behavior. He is conscience. You break these rules, i.e. you go against your conscience - it is called "lost", ie disconnected from the "wave", he does not know where.

              But there is another type of people who are obviously connected to to another god. They have access to another wave completely, to which most of us cannot physically connect. Those. they easily flout our rules without consequences. So they impose on people religions, currencies, world orders - we are for them an instrument for the realization of their ideas, arable horses.

              Therefore, we can only talk about two gods (or powers, the question is not in the term).
              1. 0
                26 October 2011 20: 33
                You say everything correctly. Each person has his own judge, his own guiding star, a line called CONSCIENCE!
              2. ztk1
                -2
                26 October 2011 21: 04
                In addition to the above

                LEVITICUS
                Ch 26

                3 If you do according to my statutes, and my commandments you keep and keep them,
                4 then I will give you rains in due time, and the earth will bring forth its growth, and the trees of the field will bring forth their fruit;
                5 And the threshing [of bread] will reach your gathering of grapes, the gathering of grapes will reach the sowing, and you will eat your bread to the full, and you will dwell in [your] land safely;
                6 I will send peace on [your] land; lie down, and no one will trouble you;
                7 And you will drive out your enemies, and they will fall before you by the sword;
                8 Five of you will drive out a hundred, and a hundred of you will drive out darkness, and your enemies will fall before you by the sword.
                9 I will look upon you, and I will make you fruitful, and I will multiply you, and I will be firm in my covenant with you;
                10 and you will eat the old of last year, and throw away the old for the sake of the new;
                11 And I will make my habitation among you, and my soul will not loathe you;
                12 And I will walk among you, and I will be your God, and you will be my people.

                And another god name is: satan
                1. zczczc
                  +1
                  27 October 2011 05: 11
                  ztk1, I said exactly the opposite - not the Torah is the written law, but conscience is the law. In Judaism, as Professor Yehuda Levi said for non-Jews: "He who recognizes the seven laws of Noah and carefully observes them, is among the righteous of the peoples of the world and is rewarded with a share in the World to Come", i.e. learn the laws, obey them - and you will be happy. This is the second god, which allows you to disconnect from the essence of things, and replace it with the Torah (I emphasize - this is true precisely for non-believers - Christians and Muslims).

                  And the first god through conscience helps to directly receive an answer to any question and act on this basis. Those. not written laws act (not the Bible or the Qur'an!), but laws perceived directly by conscience.

                  You could even say that the record of spiritual laws is to some extent sacrilege. For how can you write down what you need to feel every time? And what is the scripture in the hands of a lost conscience? Prosthesis. He himself does not know, therefore he is forced to seek answers in the Torah. This is a sign of a lack of communication with the first god (who directs through conscience). It turns out that teaching the non-Jews the Bible and the Koran disconnects them from God (from the constant practice of applying conscience).

                  Those. all these "if - then" from the Torah can be replaced with one rule: "if you are a human being, then you already know how to act." And religion, I repeat, I wrote earlier - it should be a form of knowing the world, i.e. the prototype of science, not a way of managing the masses.
                  1. ztk1
                    0
                    27 October 2011 19: 41
                    zczczc, I do not agree with everything, but I think on this issue to enter into a discussion on this topic of discussion is not entirely respectful in relation to others. Ready to talk, maybe a forum or something.
                    1. zczczc
                      0
                      27 October 2011 21: 47
                      ztk1Well, I think, since there are no atheists among us, the discussion is respectful anyway.

                      Only one thing is disrespectful - to urge a person to believe in something that his ancestors did not believe in - close or distant. For the Russian, this means that it is disrespectful to urge to believe in something other than Christianity or Vedism, for the Tatar - except for Islam and shamanism, etc.

                      Lay out the arguments, they are unlikely to be vulgar :)

                      By the way, there were very smart people among atheists, but I cannot comprehend this, and I believe that they do not see what others see, i.e. they see less, not more:

                      1. ztk1
                        +1
                        28 October 2011 00: 47
                        zczczc, In order for a person to believe God, he must open his heart to him: "Revelation 3:20 Behold, I stand at the door and knock: if anyone hears My voice and opens the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with Me. " Yes, and the laws that need to be taught and in return you will have this and that. There is a recommendation on how to proceed: "Matthew 22:37 Jesus said to him: Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind: 38 This is the first and greatest commandment; 39 the second is like her: love thy neighbor as yourself; 40 On these two commandments the whole law and the prophets are affirmed. And as a result, something bad is already difficult to do (I'm talking about myself)
                      2. zczczc
                        0
                        28 October 2011 02: 56
                        ztk1, it seems to me that "supper" with God is a distraction from reality. The very fact of constantly thinking about God - what is it? This path is not to God at all. To open up to God, you don't need to think about him, you just need to live according to your conscience. And that's all. And no cult is needed - and you will be with God. Otherwise, it resembles a child who does something dubious and squints at his parents with one eye - will they praise or scold? Likewise, the Abrahamic believer does something, then validates his actions in relation to the Torah, and then draws conclusions. This person is disconnected from God altogether. He lives according to the Torah, and not the way God created him. God does not need to be written about him and read this exposition, God only needs a person to listen to him and give him a "organ" for this in the form of conscience.

                        In this sense, many atheists are only called atheists, but in fact many of them are with God. Those. they reject the declared god and live in the essence of things. They call this "listening to themselves", but in fact they are listening to the real god. And as soon as we try to formalize this god, the divine thread between us and him breaks. This is God's self-defense system - you cannot study it, you can only listen to it. Those. the modern believer is really a hero, he needs to find and catch the grain through the thorns of scripture, to overcome the scripture that only hinders him in this. And there are only a few such heroes - during their lifetime the Abrahamic hierarchs spread rot, and after death they canonize, tk. there is nothing left to do - the people feel the catch. And one more thing - well, a real saint, who is pure, and to whom the "wave" of God is open, can not go out and say to everyone: "Do not read these books, do not break your foreheads, everything is already given to you from birth, just do not go to an agreement conscience "because because of centuries of propaganda, they simply will not understand him. That is why they usually kneel - they ask God for strength in order to somehow be able to convey to people in this dilemma that, in fact, their path goes against the scriptures.

                        Religion among all ancient peoples was only a patriarchal form of science, when branches of knowledge are associated with a god or several. On this, the whole role of religion is exhausted - a harbinger of science, an aggregator and attractor of knowledge for future generations. And these are other gods, gods, one might say - just a way to structure knowledge. And those nations that hit the cult cult, ritualism, went off the rails of progress and sunk into oblivion.

                        Abrahamic religions were the driver of growth only because of Goebbels's lie in terms of scale - this is a real "house-2": just imagine - they tell you that God is not someone ephemeral there who can be felt through conscience, but he lived among the people , here he walked right here, here are his clothes, here are the remains. It worked worse than aliens - God and on earth! Fiction! It's like 3D television for the natives. After that, you will believe in anything. And behind the preachers are the authorities, with whom they act in one team - they manipulate people through "godly" information. You can execute "infidels" (who do not believe in the Goebbels god), you can send other peoples to conquer, because they have a different god (they were shown not "house-2", but a different program, where god has a different name, but the essence is the same). Along the way, the authorities and provocateurs, in whose hands the reins from the church hierarchy, collect gold and other resources from the territories under their jurisdiction, and the peoples are accused of "savagery and barbarism", unwillingness to "truly believe." It is difficult to imagine more evil than Abrahamicism brought to the peoples of the earth.

                        Why, in fact, worry, Nostradamus said that by 2120-2150 "the cross will decay and the star of David will burn out." Lokhovodov, sooner or later, are always biting through. And they will not carry gold further than the earth :)
                        Sorry for the lost time - 1,5 thousand years. So much could have been done during this time. The Russians lived in towers in antiquity, and by the time of Peter in dugouts and huts with a fish bubble in the window.
                      3. 0
                        29 October 2011 01: 16
                        zczczc Nostradamus was a great mystifier, not a "prophet". All his "rhymes" can be rotated as you like and adjusted to fit any situation.
                        Voltaire also said that in 100 years the Bible would be forgotten. As a result, the printing house that prints the Bible is now in the house where Voltaire lived. And Voltaire himself died in complete insanity of the mind: he slept in his own impurities and completely utterly cut off human speech.
                      4. ztk1
                        0
                        30 October 2011 16: 05
                        zczczc there is such an expression: "Then he saith unto them, So give unto Caesar what is Caesar, and God to God. "(Matt. 22:21) - that is, we should not interfere with the reality with which we have established external connections and relationships, and our inner world - in which there is a relationship with God and the management of conscience. But I dare to note that conscience initially, it should have boundaries, rules, a guide to action and, as a result, the question arises: Who or what is laying this set of rules that we use in everyday life. By analogy, a program is written in the computer's hard disk and controls the operation of the computer (Very An ordinary believer initially determines his actions according to the rules that are written in the Bible (Love your neighbor, do not kill, do not steal .......) and, of course, sins in his actions and, most importantly, in his thoughts. this is the most important step in a person's life.

                        The main task of the believer is to obey God. Having been born, you already fell into God's plans for this or that. And your task, listening to yourself to hear God and do what God wants. God will never give you an unbearable burden, just as much as you can bear. Whom God loves punishes (“Whom I love, I reprove and punish. So be zealous and repent.”Rev 3:19) God is interested in how you position yourself in relation to God, the church, the family, and your neighbor. At the expense of canonization, I am against. Yes, we have no saints ("When they continued to ask Him, He, having lifted himself up, said to them: Who among you is without sin, first cast a stone at her. ” John 8.7) And it’s for sure that we are given everything from birth, we need only power to take it all. And power is given by God to those who hear God. I agree on one thing: modern religion has crushed Faith under itself and has become a mediator between the believer and God. The more intermediaries, the less the product and the higher the margin.

                        I think the purpose of religion is different: the restriction of a rational person in his actions in relation to his neighbors. The human mind developed faster than intra-social relations formed and, “taboos” did not keep pace with the development of society. The result was the killing of their own kind, undermining the development of all of humanity. Religion was supposed to simulate a set of rules for the successful development of mankind. Conceived well, but how it happened, we know.

                        One should not believe in clothes, I’ll add from myself - the icons are also superfluous, I consider the relics of the canonized to be generally nonsense, and here again we return to the topic of dialogue - we must trust God directly. The task of the church is to unite believers under its wing to strengthen the power of faith (resonance effect). But I really want to be a mediator, and the church comes up with various rituals and other events to complicate the chain “God is a believer”. The simplicity of relationships is God's providence. The “fight against witches” of the Catholic Church, of course, broke firewood, but this is a stage passed, accomplished. In Orthodoxy, too, there are enough excesses, again history. Much more important is the current state.

                        We are not prepared to know what the coming day bears. Everything that will need to be accepted with joy. And all the secrets always become apparent.
                        «Let us hear the essence of everything: fear God and keep His commandments, because this is all for man; for God will bring every matter to judgment, and all the secret, whether it is good or bad. ” Eccl 12.13
                      5. 0
                        29 October 2011 01: 11
                        In my opinion, of all this list, only Mark Twain, Freud, and Mayakovsky were unbelievers. Omar Khayyam could not be a Christian, because just didn't have enough information. I don’t know about others, I’ll definitely look in the Orthodox Internet. Generally phrases like They probably burn in hell, please avoid. Not for us to judge
                      6. zczczc
                        +1
                        29 October 2011 02: 45
                        Magadan, this phrase is really bad. It’s just such a picture. In fact, as it seemed to me, the author of the picture meant that this phrase should be written in quotation marks, i.e. he meant just that they do not burn anywhere.

                        Nostradamus, of course, is not a very serious predictor - he wrote everything in a streamlined manner. And as for religion - the whole question is who will win the next war: if the ruling families are swept away in some way, then the well-known religions have very little chances. Without external power, they will really decay. Specifically, in Russia in such a situation, a smooth process of extinction of the cult can happen - the state will throw off the support of any religions on the state. level, only as objects of cultural heritage. For example, I was surprised to learn that two people, whom I have always considered to be devout people, attend church, but do not pray to Jesus! One of them said to me: "What did you think that I could consider this Jew my god?" I was shocked, asked, why then go and to whom do you pray? The answer was: "I pray to God, but I have nowhere else to go." That's it. People belong to the generation of the early 60s.

                        And no paganism will become a religion, it is ridiculously simple. Vedism, as a scientific basis, is no longer practical - because science itself has overtaken it. The ritualism of the pagans is already alive than all living ones, and its dubious part in the form of a prayer to the gods is unlikely when it will become relevant. Have you ever clinked a drink, did you say a toast? :) This is the most pagan rite. True, before the toast was addressed to any god. About Ivan Kupala, Shrovetide, etc. any child knows. The harvest festival is still sponsored by the state in the Krasnodar Territory.

                        From religions will remain exactly what constitutes them - morality, ethics, a sense of God, a minimum of attributes - a maximum of meaning. And science has already emerged from religions, in fact, it is science that should erect monuments to religion. I don't see anything bad to portray somewhere at the entrance to the Chislobog data center, but near the Semargl foundry. After all, it does not seem wild in parks and playgrounds contemplation of incomprehensible wooden gods. Well, here the signs with the inscription will simply be added. As for the temples, it is unlikely that someone will build pagan temples with pantheons of gods, well, perhaps as a museum. But the terem architecture will be dominant in the countryside and stylistically dominant in the city. People will strive to combine the practicality of modern technology with the look of antique furniture. Finally, they will stop walking in wild black clothes, shapeless sweatshirts and ripped jeans :) So before, probably, only trunks walked (people whose clothes hung with their trunks from the extreme degree of wear). And driving black cars - that's where the unhealthy cult is!

                        This is if the ruling families sweep away. And so we are slaves in their staffing.

                        Remember Soviet abstraction in workshops, research institutes, vocational schools, in schools? And so it will be, only more beautifully and more specifically in terms of the semantics of the depicted entities:



                        These are gods, only in the form of people. Soviet atheism is closer to the 80s, as it was ever closer to the most correct attitude to religion - everyone was allowed to believe in anything, they no longer drove out of the party, but they did not support the state. level no religion. If the Union survived then, eh ...
                      7. +1
                        29 October 2011 03: 00
                        Quote: Magadan
                        They surely burn in hell, please avoid.


                        In hell, no one burns. Definitely. Well, only if we did not click through the end of the world and the Last Judgment. Therefore, as it was said in the Bible, it is after the end of the world that the judgment of God will begin, where the lambs will be separated from the chaff and will be given to everyone.

                        So hell is empty ... alas ...
                      8. zczczc
                        0
                        29 October 2011 14: 14
                        Banshee, hell according to Dante (to read, you need to increase):
              3. sirToad
                +1
                27 October 2011 03: 34
                the universe is rational and man is only its manifestation. in the universe there is harmony and there is chaos. same but in other words
                1. zczczc
                  0
                  27 October 2011 05: 13
                  sirToad, Yes exactly. And a full-fledged person should feel it directly, without books and vertically oriented religions.
                  1. sirToad
                    +1
                    28 October 2011 03: 21
                    add. Somerset Maugham has an interesting remark on the topic of God, I bring from memory - if God is a gentleman, and this is most likely the case, then he should be very unpleasant to listen to the insincere and flattering words of millions of people every day.
                    add to myself (even if someone doesn’t like it). I don’t go to church for more than 10 years. because came to the conclusion that this is a completely fake organization doing business by the divine name. I have a birch grove instead of a church. the benefit of going far is not necessary - only seven kilometers. meditation at the roots of the old birch gives me full communication with the universe.
                    1. zczczc
                      +1
                      29 October 2011 00: 46
                      sirToad, I sometimes go to church, when there is no service and few people, I go to the icons of Russian saints, of which, alas, there are few.

                      I was in the summer at the Ascension Church in Sokolniki and saw there what I last saw only in early childhood - I don’t remember what holiday was - in general, the whole floor is covered with green grass (!), Completely, with a carpet - there is practically no stone. You walk like in a forest. Along all the walls, columns, around the lamps there are many branches of birches, up to 3 meters tall. It looks fantastic, I want to notice - the golden stucco breaks through the leaves of the birch, all the decoration is golden green, rich colors, vibrant.

                      By the way, the Martha-Mariinsky monastery on Bolshaya Ordynka, which is very interesting in architectural terms:


                      In general, the view there for some reason evokes a deep antiquity, it is a pity there is no view of the courtyard.
                      1. sirToad
                        +2
                        29 October 2011 05: 31
                        actually, I like to go to churches. especially old ones. but it just so happened - my wife somehow persuaded to go to church. let's go. and there, you know, a crowd of "devout" old women always rubs at the altar. the wife turned to one of them to say where to put the candle - she turns around your tit! - a former lady from the regional executive committee! she looked at me - "He's not Russian!" She knew me, prescribed me in due time. Since then, I once again went to church - but feel in it not sacred but a heavy spirit of commerce. and something no longer arises desire.
                      2. zczczc
                        +2
                        29 October 2011 14: 24
                        sirToad, this only confirms what I said above - a person who acts clearly against God, but diligently fulfills a cult (attending church, reading a scripture) automatically considers himself a believer, and many more are more correct than others.
                      3. sirToad
                        +1
                        30 October 2011 05: 07
                        yes, that’s the way it is, and when they shed tears about the fact that the damned Bolsheviks had torn the people away from the church - I do not believe it! great-grandmother was a pious man, but she was skeptical of the church because she considered priests as lecherous and bribe-takers. although she herself loved to sing in the church choir - her voice was good.
  20. +3
    26 October 2011 18: 10
    The Vatican is not a decree for the Russian Federation.
    Let them create what they want by printing their candy wrappers.
    Russia has its own way.
    If the Russian Federation and the People's Republic of China join forces against Western expansion, then no one will think.
    1. zczczc
      +1
      28 October 2011 03: 02
      Ivan Tarasov, Russia and China, or rather the whole world and China, are historical opponents. Look at the so-called. "Great Wall of China" - its southern part is Chinese, northern, I will not argue that it is only Russian, but also Russian for sure. And the loopholes look towards China.
      There are various legends about the causes of wars. But the war was in a sense global, because in the remaining parts of the earth there were practically no people settling. The echoes of those conflicts are clearly visible in the relationship between India and China.
      Therefore, to consider China an ally is a historical fallacy. He is not an ally to anyone. In this sense, even the Americans are obtained on our side - China cannot be rebelled. The Americans are strong only because we are weak. And China is strong only thanks to itself (technology theft is inherent in any country that is on its feet).
  21. Strelez
    +1
    26 October 2011 20: 32
    One thing is important here: the amers tear the world apart in order to bathe in luxury and prosper at the expense of the rest, the rest will vegetate in the Stone Age or so, the utopian idea of ​​world domination has not died, now the amers embody it, the question is: what price are they willing to pay is it the dominance?
  22. +2
    26 October 2011 21: 13
    The Vatican has little guts, now the world is run by money, not religion, and the United States is not going to give up the role of the world bank to the Vatican! And the problems for the whole world began after the "managers" of this bank steal!
    1. +1
      9 November 2011 11: 09
      I agree ! but how many crimes are committed with the name of Christ on the lips can not be counted. all for money
  23. +1
    26 October 2011 23: 39
    It is extremely sad that people call themselves Christians, and it turns out that they have nothing to do with Christ at all. They play politics all the time and, apart from world power, do not strive for anything. It is precisely such religious figures that sought and dominated world domination and crucified Christ. Just do not because of the pope to stigmatize Christianity as a whole. Christianity is Matrona of Moscow, Seraphim of Sarov, Sergius of Radonezh, Alexander Nevsky, Nikolai Ugodnik and all those who healed, helped, and suffered blood for faith. Especially should not the Vatican and Orthodoxy put on the same board. Our ancestors knew this and preferred an alliance with Muslims, but not with the Catholic West.
    1. +1
      29 October 2011 03: 14
      No, well, I would share the fair ...
      On the same board with Orthodoxy not put the Vatican, and the Roman Catholic Church. By the way, in the history of the Catholic Church there were people like you listed: Agnes Czech, Joseph Strashevsky, Mikhail Chartoryi, Inigo de Loyola ...
    2. +1
      9 November 2011 11: 17
      * (The Vatican and Orthodoxy should not be put on the same board especially. Our ancestors knew this and preferred an alliance with Muslims, but not with the Catholic West.) That's right, because they (Catholics) plundered the cradle of Christianity, the city of CONSTANTINOPOL
  24. +1
    9 November 2011 11: 02
    the divine is in every person is his soul,