Military Review

Constitutional Court: the decisions of the ECHR can not cancel the provisions of the Basic Law of the Russian Federation

95
Decisions of the Strasbourg court must be executed in the Russian Federation, but taking into account the supremacy of the Russian Constitution, the resolution of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, announced by the judge Sergei Mavrin, says. Reports about it RIA News.

Constitutional Court: the decisions of the ECHR can not cancel the provisions of the Basic Law of the Russian Federation


The court pointed out that “Russia's participation in an international treaty does not mean renouncing state sovereignty.”

The decree notes:
“The European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and the legal positions of the ECHR based on it cannot cancel the priority of the Constitution.”


“Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights are enforceable only with recognition of the supremacy of the Constitution of the Russian Federation,” the document says.

The judge explained that "the Convention on Human Rights is an integral part of the legal system of the Russian Federation", however, "Russia may depart from the obligations imposed on it, when such a derogation is the only way to avoid violation of the Basic Law."

“The national authorities should resolve the issue of applying national legislation,” he noted.
Photos used:
ria.ru
95 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Baikonur
    Baikonur 14 July 2015 18: 03
    +75
    Right! And that already got with OWN "human rights"! They themselves have no human rights!
    But Russia doesn’t comply with the rights of PUSI-RAIT, which generally need to be hung by the legs in the smokehouse!
    1. Grandfather bear
      Grandfather bear 14 July 2015 18: 05
      +51
      A small step COP is a big step for the people!
      Maybe we’ll crawl before revising some articles.
      1. Vend
        Vend 14 July 2015 18: 09
        +21
        But this is already interesting. Let's see what howl will rise in Europe laughing
        1. vitaliy.rnd
          vitaliy.rnd 14 July 2015 21: 52
          +3
          They will raise a big howl, a big one. yes
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. siberalt
        siberalt 14 July 2015 19: 04
        +21
        Why explain? This should be explicitly written in the Constitution of the Russian Federation and all matters.
        1. soviet skytourist
          soviet skytourist 14 July 2015 19: 32
          +29
          This should be explicitly written in the Constitution of the Russian Federation and all matters.
          And there the supremacy of international law over the Russian Article 15.4 is spelled out, the prohibition of ideology is interesting in 13.2; 75.2 the Central Bank of the Russian Federation is not controlled; article 29.5 and so on. The devil is in the little things
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. Inok10
            Inok10 14 July 2015 20: 31
            +26
            Quote: sovetskyturist
            And there the supremacy of international law over the Russian Article 15.4 is spelled out, the prohibition of ideology is interesting in 13.2; 75.2 the Central Bank of the Russian Federation is not controlled; article 29.5 and so on. The devil is in the little things

            .. that’s it .. Buddy, for Pie .. on this and you pierced .. Yukos shareholders violated tax laws !!!! .. they are criminals .. and the songs and dances around the Constitution will not help them .. well, the ECHR did not get into its jurisdiction .. We all know why .. The Constitutional Court just confirmed that! .. Voila .. hi
            1. Werterex
              Werterex 15 July 2015 17: 01
              +1
              Duc and no one is against! Only the law, especially among the Gayropeyskih common people, as a draw .... hi
          3. Alena Frolovna
            Alena Frolovna 14 July 2015 20: 32
            +25
            soviet skytourist

            This should be explicitly written in the Constitution of the Russian Federation and all matters.

            And there the supremacy of international law over the Russian Article 15.4 is spelled out.


            Before you read part 4 of article 15 of the Constitution, which states that international laws take precedence over Russian laws, it’s worth starting this article to read from part 1:

            The Constitution of the Russian Federation has the highest legal force, direct effect and is applied throughout the territory of the Russian Federation. Laws and other legal acts adopted in the Russian Federation should not contradict the Constitution of the Russian Federation.

            That is, the highest priority on the territory of the Russian Federation is the Constitution, not international laws, etc.
            1. Inok10
              Inok10 14 July 2015 20: 38
              +3
              Quote: Alena Frolovna
              That is, the Constitution has the highest priority on the territory of the Russian Federation, and not international laws, etc.

              .. dear lady .. hi ..
            2. siberalt
              siberalt 14 July 2015 21: 34
              +10
              Are you a lawyer? If everything were clearly spelled out in the Constitution, then it is not necessary to go to the Constitutional Court to clarify its Constitution. Now the question. Who prescribed our Constitution in such a way that you need to engage in additional crocheting for each individual case in your defense and to whom? Before those who do not consider it sovereign? This is what we are talking about. The recognition of the Constitution of the Russian Federation as part of the international system of law is talking about something (living with wolves ... signed up). And then the WTO, etc.
              1. Do not be angry
                Do not be angry 14 July 2015 22: 18
                +6
                Quote: siberalt
                Who prescribed our Constitution in such a way that we need to engage in additional crocheting for each individual case?

                Shahrai boasted of what he wrote. (still at the post, small and not significant, but at the post that says something about)
                And the adherents of the Fedorov sect are engaged in chicanery, as well as perversion of concepts and whole articles of the Constitution, whose goal is to separate the powerful personalities from the policies they are pursuing, to shift responsibility for the current policy from those in power to "insurmountable" circumstances - the alleged lack of Russian sovereignty, occupation and so on rave.
            3. soviet skytourist
              soviet skytourist 14 July 2015 21: 44
              +2
              Well, yes, there are different opinions, democracy however. However, why then the deputies are preparing bills and probably Mr. Peskov does not read comments on the VO. [Head of the Investigative Committee of Russia (TFR) Alexander Bastrykin suggested abandoning the priority of international law over national law in the Constitution, referring to that he harms the interests of Russia.] - surely this gentleman was deeply mistaken. In the near future a bill will be submitted to the State Duma proposing to abolish the superiority of international law over Russian law http://www.newizv.ru/politics/2014-02- 25/197616-s-nog-na-golovu.htm

              Dmitry Peskov: The President did not say anything about the abolition of the principle of the supremacy of international law over national law. Putin did not address the issue of principles of priority of law
              photo archive Pravda.ru

              A spokesman for the Russian president Dmitry Peskov said. that Vladimir Putin did not say anything about the abolition of the principle of the supremacy of international law over national law.

              Peskov said that he personally did not know whether anyone was seriously considering the proposal of the head of the Investigative Committee of Russia, Alexander Bastrykin, to abolish the principle of the supremacy of international law over national law. "Vladimir Putin said nothing on this topic," Peskov said in an interview with Kommersant.

              As RBC reminds, the chairman of the ICR, Alexander Bastrykin, at a board meeting dedicated to the work of the investigative bodies for 2014 and plans for the current year, made a report in which, in particular, he proposed to exclude from the Constitution of the Russian Federation the provision "on the unconditional priority of international law over national legislation. " According to him, in other states, in contrast to Russia, "more flexible mechanisms operate." "And practice shows (especially recent international events) that this provision works against the interests of Russia, is skillfully used by Western opponents,"
              - See more at: http://www.pravda.ru/news/politics/authority/27-02-2015/1250331-peskov-0/#sthash
              .3NWWnUp7.dpuf
            4. The comment was deleted.
            5. Werterex
              Werterex 15 July 2015 17: 02
              0
              The law should not be ambiguous .... Madame! hi
          4. Karabin
            Karabin 14 July 2015 21: 28
            +3
            Quote: sovetskyturist
            And there the primacy of international law over the Russian Article 15.4 is spelled out.

            We look in the book, we see a fig. But a screech is a screech.
          5. vitaliy.rnd
            vitaliy.rnd 14 July 2015 21: 54
            +2
            Well, here you have listed the articles that must be reviewed without fail.
            1. alvog
              alvog 15 July 2015 05: 08
              +1
              You can argue a lot, but in any case, all the concerned, sick people for the country have been waiting for this decision for a long time, and this event can only be welcomed ...
          6. Do not be angry
            Do not be angry 14 July 2015 22: 11
            -2
            Quote: sovetskyturist
            And there the supremacy of international law over the Russian Article 15.4 is spelled out, the prohibition of ideology is interesting in 13.2; 75.2 the Central Bank of the Russian Federation is not controlled; article 29.5 and so on.

            Do not spread lies and do not write nonsense. E Fedorov is doing this for a salary, but what kind of joy is it that makes you stupid to expose yourself?

            There is no supremacy of international law over Russian in the Constitution.
            No (and cannot be) the uncontrollability of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation.
            Read the laws and the text of the Constitution and not a distorted interpretation of them by E. Fedorov and his similar demagogues.
            1. Werterex
              Werterex 15 July 2015 17: 07
              +2
              Sorry, clubgenossa ... I’m not a fan of Fedorov, but if such questions arise, then there is a reason. drinks laughing hi
              1. Do not be angry
                Do not be angry 16 July 2015 11: 26
                +1
                Quote: Werterex
                .I am not a fan of Fedorov, but if such questions arise, ...

                What questions?
                Once again - in the Constitution of the Russian Federation there is NO priority of international law over Russian.
                In the Constitution of the Russian Federation there is no provision on the insubordination and non-control of the Central Bank to the authorities of the Russian Federation.
                All this is only in the widespread theory of Fedorov about the lack of sovereignty of Russia, occupation, independence of the Central Bank from Russia.
                This theory is based on a conscious distortion of the meaning of articles of the Constitution, perverted interpretation, stretch, pulling out individual phrases from the context, replacing the meaning written in the Constitution with speculation, outright demagogy and lies.
                Quote: Werterex
                then there is a reason.

                There is certainly a reason (and not just an occasion, but I would say the goal), but not where you see it.
                The meaning of the reason, the goal, and even the order for Fedorov's nonsense is as follows; to separate the top power personalities from their policies, to remove them from criticism and responsibility for the negative consequences of their policies, to shift the blame for the negative aspects of the policies pursued to "insuperable circumstances" - the lack of sovereignty of the Russian Federation, "occupation." "independence" of the Central Bank from the authorities of the Russian Federation and "non-belonging" to the Central Bank of Russia.
                and therefore extend the stay of current leaders in power indefinitely
                Quote: Werterex
                And it must be eliminated.

                Give it a try. I think that they will not understand you at the very top.
          7. Werterex
            Werterex 15 July 2015 16: 59
            0
            Here I am about the same ....
        2. Cat man null
          Cat man null 14 July 2015 19: 37
          -2
          Quote: siberalt
          This should be explicitly written in the Constitution of the Russian Federation and all matters

          It is already registered there ..

          Constitutional Court - here you will be surprised - your decisions are made, guided by the Constitution of the Russian Federation.

          According to the syllables: not the USA .. not Great Britain, not Germany ..

          Constitution of the Russian Federation yes

          Quote: sovetskyturist
          And there the supremacy of international law over Russian is spelled out

          Did you read article 15 yourself, or did someone tell you about it?

          Zadolbali this topic already ..
          1. soviet skytourist
            soviet skytourist 14 July 2015 19: 45
            +2


            Quote: sovetskyturist

            And there the supremacy of international law over Russian is spelled out

            Did you read article 15 yourself, or did someone tell you about it?

            Zadolbali this topic already ..


             Reply

             Quote

             Report a violation of the rules of the site













            Loading ...

            The universally recognized principles and norms of international law and international treaties of the Russian Federation are an integral part of its legal system. If the international treaty of the Russian Federation establishes other rules than those provided for by law, the rules of the international treaty are applied.
            1. Cat man null
              Cat man null 14 July 2015 20: 39
              +4
              Quote: sovetskyturist
              If other rules are established by an international treaty of the Russian Federation than those provided by law, the rules of the international treaty shall apply.

              Exactly .. and now - by division:

              - if an international treaty of the Russian Federation - that is, the contract is concluded on behalf of the Russian Federation, right? In her, RF, interests, I would like to hope, right?

              - if this the contract establishes other rules than are provided by law - that is - the agreement "corrects and supplements" the law. Is it possible? - Yes. Does it have to be this way? - no.

              - then the rules of the international treaty apply. (dot)

              The rules of an international treaty concluded by the Russian Federation apply. And that’s all.

              Where the hell did you see the "supremacy of international law" here? What the hell is this little animal - "international law" ?? There is no such thing in nature ..

              Laws, Mlyn .. fool
              1. Werterex
                Werterex 15 July 2015 17: 08
                0
                Casuistry is everything)))) I-throwing the spirit ..... bully
              2. Mikhail m
                Mikhail m 16 July 2015 08: 55
                0
                International law is a complex set of legal norms created by states and interstate organizations through agreements and constituting an independent legal system, the subject of regulation of which are interstate and other international relations, as well as certain domestic relations
                Quote from a textbook on international law, damn it.
            2. Do not be angry
              Do not be angry 14 July 2015 22: 26
              +1
              Quote: sovetskyturist
              The generally recognized principles and norms of international law and international treaties of the Russian Federation are integral part its legal system

              That's it - PART, and not a priority and not a primacy over Russian law.
              Are you even able to UNDERSTAND what you write yourself?
              Set a goal to understand what is written LITERALLY and not in the perverted logic of Fedorov’s interpretations and everything will be fine.
          2. The comment was deleted.
          3. soviet skytourist
            soviet skytourist 14 July 2015 19: 57
            0
            Zadolbali this topic already ..
            may lawyers eat on the site or not burdock chew Mr. Cat Man Null the meaning of what is written there [Constitution of the Russian Federation, Article 75

            Article 75
            1. The monetary unit in the Russian Federation is the ruble. Monetary issue is carried out exclusively by the Central Bank of the Russian Federation. Introduction and issue of other money in the Russian Federation are not allowed.
            2. Protection and ensuring the stability of the ruble is the main function of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, which it carries out regardless of other public authorities.
            3. The system of taxes levied on the federal budget and the general principles of taxation and fees in the Russian Federation are established by federal law.
            4. State loans are issued in the manner determined by federal law and are placed on a voluntary basis.] ...... [Article 13 Send to print Print Share 1. In the Russian Federation, ideological diversity is recognized. 2. No ideology may be established as state or mandatory. 3. In the Russian Federation, political diversity and multi-party system are recognized. 4. Public associations are equal before the law. 5. It is forbidden to create and operate public associations whose goals or actions are aimed at forcibly changing the foundations of the constitutional system and violating the integrity of the Russian Federation, undermining the security of the state, creating armed groups, inciting social, racial, national and religious hatred.] ..... [Article 15 Send to print Print Share 1. The Constitution of the Russian Federation has the highest legal force, direct effect and applies throughout the Russian Federation. Laws and other legal acts adopted in the Russian Federation shall not contradict the Constitution of the Russian Federation. 2. State authorities, local governments, officials, citizens and their associations are required to comply with the Constitution of the Russian Federation and laws. 3. Laws are subject to official publication. Unpublished laws do not apply. Any normative legal acts affecting the rights, freedoms and duties of a person and a citizen cannot be applied if they are not published officially for the public. 4. The generally recognized principles and norms of international law and international treaties of the Russian Federation are an integral part of its legal system. If an international treaty of the Russian Federation establishes rules other than those provided by law, then the rules of the international treaty apply.
            ]
            1. Civil
              Civil 14 July 2015 20: 26
              +1
              may lawyers eat on the site or not burdock chew Mr. Cat Man Null the meaning of what is written there [Constitution of the Russian Federation, Article 75

              Native, most of the laws and decrees to them, and methodological recommendations to them, and orders, letters with explanations - I did not care about this constitution. This is probably one of the last points that is sometimes executed.

              Now, if you are bent on chaos, there will be no one.
              1. poquello
                poquello 14 July 2015 22: 03
                +2
                Quote: Civil
                may lawyers eat on the site or not burdock chew Mr. Cat Man Null the meaning of what is written there [Constitution of the Russian Federation, Article 75

                Native, most of the laws and decrees to them, and methodological recommendations to them, and orders, letters with explanations - I did not care about this constitution. This is probably one of the last points that is sometimes executed.

                Now, if you are bent on chaos, there will be no one.

                The ECHR bent you and me (almost) with its decision on Yukos, probably it’s time to change these skis to skates, summer is in the yard.
                1. Mik13
                  Mik13 15 July 2015 00: 49
                  +3
                  Quote: poquello
                  The ECHR bent you and me (almost) with its decision on Yukos, probably it’s time to change these skis to skates, summer is in the yard.

                  Probably, before writing on such topics, you should at least see how the Hague Arbitration (PCA) differs from the ECHR.
                  1. Werterex
                    Werterex 15 July 2015 17: 20
                    +1
                    There is no need. The decisions of the ECHR are not binding on the fields of one country of the world. So ....
                  2. poquello
                    poquello 15 July 2015 22: 44
                    0
                    Quote: Mik13
                    Quote: poquello
                    The ECHR bent you and me (almost) with its decision on Yukos, probably it’s time to change these skis to skates, summer is in the yard.

                    Probably, before writing on such topics, you should at least see how the Hague Arbitration (PCA) differs from the ECHR.

                    Correctly! No different, Gaga in F!
                2. Mik13
                  Mik13 15 July 2015 01: 05
                  +1
                  Quote: poquello
                  The ECHR bent you and me (almost) with its decision on Yukos, probably it’s time to change these skis to skates, summer is in the yard.


                  Quote: Mik13
                  Probably, before writing on such topics, you should at least see how the Hague Arbitration (PCA) differs from the ECHR.


                  I apologize. hi Indeed, there was a consideration, on 31 July 2014 awarded 1,86 billion euros ...

                  Confused with the famous PCA solution
                3. The comment was deleted.
            2. Uncle Joe
              Uncle Joe 14 July 2015 20: 45
              +10
              Quote: sovetskyturist
              chew on Mr. Cat Man Null the meaning of what is written there
              And then he doesn’t need to chew, but to Mr. Sovtourist, who is not Soviet laughing

              1. The monetary unit in the Russian Federation is the ruble
              The ruble is the monetary unit of the Russian Federation.

              Money emission is carried out exclusively by the Central Bank of the Russian Federation
              Counterfeiting is prohibited, only a specific government agency provides money emission.

              Protecting and ensuring the stability of the ruble is the main function of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, which it exercises independently of other public authorities
              The Constitution of the Russian Federation (to which the Central Bank of the Russian Federation is subordinate) gives the Central Bank of the Russian Federation the main function that (specifically this function) it performs independently of other fed. bodies (he carries out his remaining functions together with another, the same as himself, federal bodies)

              In the Russian Federation, ideological diversity is recognized. 2. No ideology may be established as state or mandatory
              No ideology, other than that established in the form of a basic legal norm, can be established by law as mandatory (a constitutional referendum is required to change)

              political diversity, multi-party system are recognized. 4. Public associations are equal before the law. 5. Forbidden
              Recognized, equal, prohibited.

              The Constitution of the Russian Federation has the highest legal force, direct effect and is applied throughout the territory of the Russian Federation. Laws and other legal acts adopted in the Russian Federation should not contradict the Constitution of the Russian Federation.
              Everyone must observe the constitution; any law that does not contradict it can be adopted.

              The generally recognized principles and norms of international law and international treaties of the Russian Federation are an integral part of its legal system.
              All under which the Russian Federation has signed, ratified and approved - it becomes part of its legal system.

              If other rules are established by an international treaty of the Russian Federation than stipulated by law, then the rules of the international treaty apply
              If the president signed, then the State Duma and the Federation Council ratified (adopted the corresponding federal law), after which the president approved and didn’t manage to change the regulatory framework, then it’s not what the regulatory framework means, but the new federal law containing the provisions signed and approved by the president RF international treaty.

              In general, count for your knowledge of the subject.
              1. soviet skytourist
                soviet skytourist 14 July 2015 22: 08
                +2


                1. The monetary unit in the Russian Federation is the ruble
                The ruble is the monetary unit of the Russian Federation.


                Money emission is carried out exclusively by the Central Bank of the Russian Federation
                Counterfeiting is prohibited, only a specific government agency provides money emission.


                Protecting and ensuring the stability of the ruble is the main function of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, which it exercises independently of other public authorities
                The Constitution of the Russian Federation (to which the Central Bank of the Russian Federation is subordinate) gives the Central Bank of the Russian Federation the main function that (specifically this function) it performs independently of other fed. bodies (he carries out his remaining functions together with another, the same as himself, federal bodies)
                that is, as I want and I turn the Fed’s branch in Russia — an exchange of dollars into rubles, under what and how the ruble is issued. Your beloved ones and the geyropeytsy bought the whole world with their wastepaper, it’s clear why they exchange dollars for oil and gas for you
                1. Uncle Joe
                  Uncle Joe 14 July 2015 23: 01
                  +4
                  Quote: sovetskyturist
                  Ie as I want and toss and turn
                  You yes.

                  Fed branch in Russia
                  With this to the psychiatrist.

                  Under what and how does the ruble issue go
                  Under the projected volume of trade (domestic production + import) and the amount of foreign currency that companies want or are forced to exchange.

                  Your beloved s and geyropeytsy bought up the whole world with their wastepaper, it is clear why they give you dollars in exchange for oil and gas
                  They have an aggregate share in global industrial production of about 35% (this is without a service market), and having received dollars in exchange for oil from the Russian Federation then exchanges these dollars for goods that make up about 75% of the Russian commodity turnover (starting with food and medicine, and ending with technologies and engineering products).
                  1. The comment was deleted.
                  2. soviet skytourist
                    soviet skytourist 14 July 2015 23: 29
                    0
                    Under the projected volume of trade (domestic production + import) and the amount of foreign currency that companies want or are forced to exchange.
                    and having received dollars in exchange for oil, the Russian Federation then exchanges these dollars for goods constituting ........
                    key dollars in exchange for oil, only oil cannot be materialized from the air, and dollars can be printed. probably that's why, for example, Russia is trying to trade in national currencies, for example, with China. The cow gives milk ... And what and to whom does the “sacred cow” nicknamed “US Federal Reserve” give? Http: //dotu.ru/2011/08/30/cow-gives-milk/
                    1. Uncle Joe
                      Uncle Joe 14 July 2015 23: 56
                      +2
                      Quote: sovetskyturist
                      key dollars in exchange for oil
                      Because you want to tach? laughing

                      only oil cannot be materialized from the air, and dollars can be printed
                      "Print" as much as is already in circulation, put it into circulation, get a price increase in proportion to the dollars entered into circulation and take it easy - except for the change in prices in dollar terms, nothing will change.

                      This is probably why, for example, Russia is trying to trade in national currencies, for example, with China.
                      The Russian Federation agrees on such calculations in the conditions of an already established market structure (in fact, it is almost barter) in order to save on the exchange rate.

                      http://dotu
                      Do me a favor - do not try to force links to sects like KOB, Fedorov, Starikov or Sulakshin to me anymore.
                      1. Werterex
                        Werterex 15 July 2015 17: 40
                        +1
                        By the way! Why not? The task of explaining to us not the way of what they are wrong .... The topic, because you must agree, is relevant. And I will tell you how to organize a crypt in the city ... feel
                  3. Werterex
                    Werterex 15 July 2015 17: 29
                    0
                    There was recently a wonderful thread about Tsiprakis, Stalin, etc. As they say, the passage passed fellow
              2. Mikhail m
                Mikhail m 16 July 2015 09: 00
                0
                Quote: Uncle Joe
                Protecting and ensuring the stability of the ruble is the main function of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation

                Those. making a decision on the floating ruble exchange rate unconstitutional? The Central Bank does not cope with its responsibilities? Where are the organizational conclusions?
                1. Uncle Joe
                  Uncle Joe 16 July 2015 14: 11
                  +1
                  Quote: Michael m
                  Those. making a decision on the floating ruble exchange rate unconstitutional?
                  So.

                  The Central Bank does not cope with its responsibilities? Where are the organizational conclusions?
                  Clause "D" of Article 83 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation.
                  The President of the Russian Federation: ... raises the question of the dismissal of the Chairman of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation before the State Duma;

                  Clause "E.1" of Article 83 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation.
                  The President of the Russian Federation: submits to the Federation Council candidates for appointment to the post of the Prosecutor General of the Russian Federation and Deputy Prosecutors General of the Russian Federation;

                  Section 3 of the Central Bank Law.
                  The objectives of the Bank of Russia are: to protect and ensure the stability of the ruble ...

                  Paragraph 7 of Article 20 of the Law on the Central Bank.
                  The Chairman of the Bank of Russia: bears full responsibility for the activities of the Bank of Russia;

                  Clause 5 of Part 7 of Article 14 of the Law on the Central Bank.
                  The Chairman of the Bank of Russia may be removed from office only in cases of: violation of federal laws that regulate issues related to the activities of the Bank of Russia.

                  The Central Bank has not simply failed to cope with its constitutional responsibilities - the Central Bank has deliberately violated the constitution and law.
                  Moreover, without the approval of the National Banking Council (the powers are prescribed in Chapter 3 of the Central Bank Law), the State Duma of the Russian Federation and the President, he could not do this (otherwise, at least there would have been consequences provided for by the 14th and 20th articles of the law, and 83- article of the Constitution)

                  But the banking council did not say anything, the State Duma, to which the Central Bank is accountable (except for the Communist Party - http://www.rbc.ru/rbcfreenews/54c5a8429a794752bc51653b) did not say anything, and the president, who is running for the EP and supported by the LDPR and SR, whose responsibility is to guarantee and enforce the constitution, stated that the Central Bank is doing everything right ...

                  Draw conclusions.
                  1. Do not be angry
                    Do not be angry 16 July 2015 23: 07
                    +4
                    Quote: Uncle Joe
                    Draw conclusions.

                    Competently! good drinks
            3. Rostov
              Rostov 14 July 2015 21: 06
              +4
              Quote: sovetskyturist
              maybe there are lawyers on the site or not burdock chew Mr. Cat Man Null the meaning of what is written there

              If your opponent is interested, he can read the resolution of the Plenum of the RF Armed Forces regarding the priority of international law over domestic law. So you are right. And now the Constitutional Court has adopted a political decision, which had long had to be taken. In general, I already wrote about our laws earlier
              P.S. somehow at the conference I managed to talk with a law professor from Italy. To a question from the audience about why the ECHR has a more rigorous (or politicized) approach to decisions regarding the Russian Federation - the following answer followed: Yes, there is no policy there, your state itself has adopted such laws! He was asked again from the audience - Well, is that what you Europeans and Americans recommended? He with a smile - Well, after all, it was recommended, not forced!
              1. Cat man null
                Cat man null 14 July 2015 21: 15
                +3
                Quote: Rostov
                he can read the resolution of the Plenum of the RF Armed Forces regarding the priority of international law over domestic

                RESOLUTION OF THE Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation

                “On the application by courts of general jurisdiction of universally recognized principles and norms of international law and international treaties of the Russian Federation” dated October 10, 2003 No. 5

                It?

                I read it .. so what? Where in it is the supremacy of international law over Russian?

                Ka-a-aak intre-eesno .. feel
                1. soviet skytourist
                  soviet skytourist 14 July 2015 21: 23
                  +3
                  The head of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation, Alexander Bastrykin, proposed removing the principle of supremacy of international law over Russian from the Constitution. In his opinion, such a step will give Russia more independence in the legal sphere.

                  In other states, “more flexible mechanisms are operating,” the report of the head of the RF IC, published on the agency’s website, says. “And practice shows - especially recent international events - that this provision works against the interests of Russia, is skillfully used by Western opponents,” Bastrykin points out. //Ruposters.ru/news/26-02-2015/bastrykin-predlozhil-sdelat -rossij
                  skoe-pravo-prioritetnee-mezhdunarodnogo fellow
                2. The comment was deleted.
            4. Do not be angry
              Do not be angry 14 July 2015 22: 51
              +4
              Quote: sovetskyturist
              maybe there are lawyers on the site or not burdock chew Mr. Cat Man Null the meaning of what is written there

              Yes, Cat Man Null has long and repeatedly chewed on this topic. To his credit, I must admit that, although not without difficulty and not immediately, it came to him, judging by today's comments on this topic.

              Quote: sovetskyturist
              Article 75
              1. The monetary unit in the Russian Federation is the ruble. Monetary issue is carried out exclusively by the Central Bank of the Russian Federation. Introduction and issue of other money in the Russian Federation are not allowed.


              This means that everyone who cares from the Duma and the Cabinet of Ministers to the Federation Council and the Constitutional Court cannot engage in the issue of money. This is done exclusively by the Central Bank, which, in turn, according to the law on the Bank of Russia
              pursues a monetary policy in cooperation with the Government of the Russian Federation and is accountable to the State Duma.

              2. Protection and ensuring the stability of the ruble is the main function of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, which it carries out regardless of other public authorities.


              It means that YOUR FUNCTION The Central Bank implements independently and independently (otherwise we would have seen this stability (just as it was in December, when the Central Bank, bending over, fulfilled what Sechin and others like him wanted from him)), and not that "the Central Bank is independent from the authorities of the Russian Federation, does not belong to Russia "and other Fedorov's nonsense and brainwash.

              If other rules are established by an international treaty of the Russian Federation than those provided by law, the rules of the international treaty shall apply.

              This means that if you have entered into an international treaty, you are so kind as to fulfill it. If we do not want to fulfill what we do not like, then we do not need to conclude such agreements.
          4. The comment was deleted.
        3. Do not be angry
          Do not be angry 14 July 2015 22: 04
          +3
          Quote: siberalt
          This should be explicitly written in the Constitution of the Russian Federation and all matters.

          This is expressly written in the Constitution of the Russian Federation.
          Chapter 1. Fundamentals of the constitutional system

          Article 4

          1. Sovereignty The Russian Federation extends to its entire territory.

          2. The Constitution of the Russian Federation and federal laws take precedence throughout the Russian Federation.
          .....

          Article 15

          1. The Constitution of the Russian Federation has the highest legal effect, direct effect and applies throughout the Russian Federation. Laws and other legal acts adopted in the Russian Federation shall not contradict the Constitution of the Russian Federation.
          .....
          4. The universally recognized principles and norms of international law and international treaties of the Russian Federation are an integral part of its legal system. If the international treaty of the Russian Federation establishes other rules than those provided for by law, the rules of the international treaty are applied.

          www.constitution.ru/10003000/10003000-3.htm


          Nothing is said about any supremacy of international law over Russian. It is only written that if we conclude international treaties (accept certain obligations), we are obliged to fulfill them. If our laws are contrary to international rules, then we must either not conclude such international agreements that are contrary to our laws, or bring our laws in line with our obligations (as a result of international agreements).
    2. Major Yurik
      Major Yurik 14 July 2015 18: 08
      +18
      It's not about rights, it's about people! If khodors, mevzlins and other scum are "people" knee-deep in blood, then their rights and their court recognizing baida and his decisions are nothing! am
    3. Reserve officer
      Reserve officer 14 July 2015 18: 09
      +10
      Absolutely the right decision, otherwise the national legislation of any country is a fiction. That's just why a request to the Constitutional Court was sent just now? It turns out that if it were not for the decision in the Yukos case, would everything still be normal?
      1. Vladimirets
        Vladimirets 14 July 2015 18: 13
        -3
        Quote: Reserve officer
        It turns out that if not for the decision in the Yukos case

        The ECHR did not consider the Yukos case.
        1. Reserve officer
          Reserve officer 14 July 2015 19: 37
          +8
          Eugene, I think that you are mistaken.
          RIA Novosti quote: "Russian Justice Minister Alexander Konovalov said that Russia agreed to accept the decision of the European Court of Human Rights on the Yukos oil company case, although it considers it unfounded.
          On December 16, the ECHR Collegium rejected the Justice Ministry's complaint to review the court's decision, which ordered at the end of July 2014 to pay the former Yukos shareholders 1,86 billion euros. Russia's representative to the ECHR, Deputy Minister of Justice Georgy Matyushkin considered the court's decision biased and stressed that the interests of creditors were ignored. According to him, Russia has legal grounds not to pay the former shareholders of the company this money. "
          1. Vladimirets
            Vladimirets 14 July 2015 21: 49
            +2
            Quote: Reserve officer
            Eugene, I think that you are mistaken.

            I agree, only the claim of Menatep, who was considering the Hague arbitration, settled in his head. hi
        2. Cat man null
          Cat man null 14 July 2015 19: 43
          -1
          Quote: Vladimirets
          The ECHR did not consider the Yukos case.

          Oh really?

          "Further actions of the Russian Ministry of Justice related to Judgments issued by the European Court of Human Rights on the complaints "Anchugov and Gladkov v. Russia" and "YUKOS v. Russia" will be carried out on the basis of the legal position formulated by the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation and binding on all subjects of rights on the territory of the Russian Federation on the priority of the Constitution of the Russian Federation in relation to acts of international judicial bodies "
          1. twviewer
            twviewer 14 July 2015 20: 48
            0
            Quote: Cat Man Null
            will be carried out proceeding from the legal position 0 formulated by the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation and which is mandatory for all subjects of rights in the territory of the Russian Federation ...

            ... a free interpretation of the law? what is there to enjoy ?? and how then to convince other federal judges to read the law as it should, and not as you want ???
            why do this? there are more rational solutions, you just have to work, and not push slogans under the cameras.
        3. The comment was deleted.
    4. The comment was deleted.
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. Vitaly Anisimov
        Vitaly Anisimov 14 July 2015 18: 21
        +1
        The letters of the ECHR ... my answer is from the "ostrich court" ...
        I hope many understood me ..? drinks laughing
        1. SHILO
          SHILO 14 July 2015 19: 15
          +6
          Quote: MIKHAN
          The letters of the ECHR ... my answer is from the "ostrich court" ...
          I hope many understood me ..? drinks laughing


          No one understood you! request You already know that just like that I don’t put a minus. But then it worked. AND! Don't freak out really. This is just a minus! laughing Silently put me - I will understand you.
          1. Vitaly Anisimov
            Vitaly Anisimov 14 July 2015 19: 18
            +3
            Quote: SHILO
            Quote: MIKHAN
            The letters of the ECHR ... my answer is from the "ostrich court" ...
            I hope many understood me ..? drinks laughing


            No one understood you! request You already know that just like that I don’t put a minus. But then it worked. AND! Don't freak out really. This is just a minus! laughing Silently put me - I will understand you.

            No, I won’t, I don’t see the point .. (someone immediately slipped through a thought .. or one of those)))
            Here is my answer .. I think so!

            Who once betrayed and fled ... God is his judge!
            1. SHILO
              SHILO 14 July 2015 19: 52
              +8
              Quote: MIKHAN
              God is his judge!


              Gold words! Well, let God be, and not some kind of MIKHAN ... With a head shot through ... We do not just choose Ava ... wink
              All your "merit" is that you were lucky to be in Russia during the collapse. Not more!
              1. Vitaly Anisimov
                Vitaly Anisimov 14 July 2015 20: 20
                +1
                Quote: SHILO
                Quote: MIKHAN
                God is his judge!


                Gold words! Well, let God be, and not some kind of MIKHAN ... With a head shot through ... We do not just choose Ava ... wink
                All your "merit" is that you were lucky to be in Russia during the collapse. Not more!

                Are you complaining ... about your homeland? Here are your keywords .. hi Slippery you .. I immediately understood it .. Has the ECHR already filed a complaint or are you just collecting materials ..? Do not forget to mention me there)))) I will sign everything about how I violated your "rights" ... heh heh You were an "awl" in Ukraine and in Russia you will be the same (only more loud) "Human rights" should be observed especially in deep rear of Russia! Be careful not to overdo it "awl" ... bully
                1. SHILO
                  SHILO 14 July 2015 20: 35
                  +3
                  Quote: MIKHAN
                  Are you complaining about your homeland? Here are your key words .. hi You are slippery .. I immediately understood it .. Has the ECHR already filed a complaint or are you just collecting materials ..? Do not forget to mention me there)))) I will sign everything about how I violated your "rights" ... heh heh You were an "awl" in Ukraine and in Russia you will be the same (only more loud) "Human rights" should be observed especially in deep rear of Russia! Be careful not to overdo it "awl" ...


                  Listen buddy. I regard you as adequate. But I see rarely mistaken ...
                  1. Klim2011
                    Klim2011 14 July 2015 22: 40
                    +1
                    If you relate to such as adequate, then you are often mistaken, and not rare.
        2. DEMENTIY
          DEMENTIY 14 July 2015 20: 22
          +2
          Quote: MIKHAN
          The letters of the ECHR ... my answer is from the "ostrich court" ...
          I hope many understood me ..? drinks laughing


          Vitaka! And you do not thump by chance !?
          1. Vitaly Anisimov
            Vitaly Anisimov 14 July 2015 20: 37
            +1
            Quote: DEMENTIY
            Quote: MIKHAN
            The letters of the ECHR ... my answer is from the "ostrich court" ...
            I hope many understood me ..? drinks laughing


            Vitaka! And you do not thump by chance !?

            So a little ..)) I'll go to work tomorrow ... Here they poke an "awl" again! bully I fight back as best I can .. I did not touch him ..! And for a long time I suggested to him, get an allowance and don’t touch me. I’m not interested in "putting it mildly" And he will be happy! ... It's no coincidence that he has a nickname "awl"! bully hi There are the disadvantages of spar))) But I'm in the "penalties" and they are on my side already .. ESPH it's real.))) wassat
            1. SHILO
              SHILO 14 July 2015 21: 04
              +3
              Quote: MIKHAN
              It is no coincidence that he has the nickname "shilo"


              Yeah. Not casual. Look how I got it - to a hot white. And not yet evening ...

              Quote: MIKHAN
              And for a long time I offered him, get the allowance and do not touch me ...


              My friend is not getting benefits. I make a living on my own. Unlike you.

              Quote: MIKHAN
              Looks like cons.)))


              Yes! Mine is and see not only mine ... laughing

              Quote: MIKHAN
              and don't touch me


              Now I will constantly "touch". Agreed.
              1. Ruslan67
                Ruslan67 14 July 2015 21: 13
                +1
                Quote: SHILO
                Now I will constantly "touch". Agreed.

                But you, however, Dima or Kostya? It’s like the former opera, but it’s not clear who you are relearning to instead of strengthening the law enforcement agencies of New Russia what Ask a couple more questions? Yes! For three seized trunks in the 90s we were not even given a bonus No.
                1. SHILO
                  SHILO 14 July 2015 21: 29
                  +3
                  Quote: Ruslan67
                  But are you, however, Dima or Kostya?


                  For whom Dima, and for whom Kostya ... For you Kostya.

                  Quote: Ruslan67
                  It’s like the former opera, but it’s unclear who you are relearning to instead of strengthening the law enforcement agencies of New Russia
                  about.

                  And this is for GDP, please. To Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin - who fell silent about the "Russian world" abruptly.

                  Are you ill with New Russia? So no one bothers to go. Only trouble is that the plans do not have it ... request
                  1. Vitaly Anisimov
                    Vitaly Anisimov 14 July 2015 21: 46
                    +1
                    Quote: SHILO
                    And this is for GDP, please. To Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin - who fell silent about the "Russian world" abruptly.

                    Are you ill with New Russia? So no one bothers to go. Only trouble is that the plans do not have it.

                    He fled to the deep rear of Russia and here he also teaches what and how we should do ...? I think the highest impudence .. I would keep quiet .. heh heh These are then pushed back to the outskirts of "human rights to swing" ... And everything will start from the beginning! negative
                  2. Ruslan67
                    Ruslan67 14 July 2015 21: 54
                    +1
                    Quote: SHILO
                    So no one bothers to go.

                    My home is here request But to go to Russia and from here we also blame what Somehow not very patriotic No. As far as I know seven on the benches do not peep Or tortured pacifism?
                    Quote: SHILO
                    For whom Dima, and for whom Kostya.

                    Well ... Former Ukrainian opera Or maybe Lithuanian? and not the former? bully
      3. opus
        opus 14 July 2015 18: 37
        +7
        Quote: Alf
        And they don’t have people

        Is.


        Half a million Parisians against the "dictatorship of minorities"

        even in Australia there
        2012: The leaders of the Orthodox, Catholic and Anglican communities in Australia called on politicians to prevent the legalization of same-sex unions in the country.

        But there are fewer of them, unfortunately


        What is happening in Russia awful; but the situation is even worsesince Russia is not alone in this sense- said Jessica Stern, Executive Director International human rights commissions for gays and lesbians.
        the truth is: Cameroon, Burundi, Jamaica, Uganda, Iran, Qatar, Ke
        Niya, Tanzania ...
        For LGBT people: Kenya (10 years of hard labor), Uganda (14 years of imprisonment) and Tanzania (from 20 years to life).
        1. Izotovp
          Izotovp 14 July 2015 19: 02
          +3
          Iran, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Yemen, Mauritania-the death penalty))))
          1. opus
            opus 14 July 2015 19: 20
            +1
            Quote: Izotovp
            Iran,

            IRAN: According to the Penal Code of the Islamic Republic of Iran, adopted after the 1979 revolution of the year, the death penalty is potential punishment for homosexuality. Kissing another man or another woman in a public place may be the basis for 60 lashes.
            Modification of the Criminal Code of Iran, Held in May 2013criminalizes non-specific actions, and homosexual identification, and for this, punishment in the form of lashes in the amount from 31 to 74

            Qatar:

            As in Russia, the laws of Qatar against homosexuals have been more thoroughly tested, as this country is preparing to host the World Cup in 2022. Qatari laws view homosexuality as a criminal offense, which can be punished up to seven years imprisonment (or life sentence if one of the accused is less than 16 years old).
            Saudi Arabia and AOE- death penalty, Mauritania Criminal Code with 1983- death penalty

            Sudan. Punishment for same-sex relationships: from five years in prison to death
            Barbados: Lifetime (Not a single large cruise agency specializing in organizing travel for gay supporters, does not include Barbados in the list of visiting points. Homosexual travelers are specifically warned about the dangers of appearing on the island and even more so the manifestation of their inclinations, which can cause not only domestic violence, but also harsh criminal punishment - up to life imprisonment. )
            Yemen: Punishment ranges from lashing to the death penalty.

            Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC: Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, Oman, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates) intends to introduce medical testing for all tourists in order to detect sexual minorities.
            +
          2. padded jacket
            padded jacket 14 July 2015 20: 01
            +2
            Quote: Izotovp
            Iran, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Yemen, Mauritania - death penalty

            But in the "most democratic" country in the world, the USA:
            The US Army will be allowed to serve transgender people
            The Pentagon has seriously decided to strengthen the American army with transgender people - people who have changed their sex. Defense Minister Ashton Carter wants to see "friends" of Conchita Wurst in the ranks of the armed forces. The official has already instructed to assemble a working group that will consider the possibility of recruiting transgender people.
            http://tehrosinfo.ru/blog/43945082810/V-armii-SSHA-razreshat-sluzhit-transseksua
            lam
            1. padded jacket
              padded jacket 14 July 2015 20: 07
              +3
              Or in another country, too, the victorious democracy of Israel;


              Pride Parade in Tel Aviv: a celebration for everyone
              The 16th Pride Parade (LGBT community) took place in Tel Aviv, attracting a record number of guests this year - over 100 thousand people
              When asked what they were doing here, everyone gave the same answer: "This is a holiday of freedom. This is a holiday for everyone."
              http://newsru.co.il/israel/13jun2014/gay_501.html
              The embodiment of Sodoma and Gommora is only today, and they want to turn our country into this.
              1. Panikovsky
                Panikovsky 14 July 2015 21: 11
                +1
                Quote: quilted jacket
                The embodiment of Sodoma and Gommora is only today, and they want to turn our country into this.

                this is exactly what, Vatnik, I also wanted to say, but now I’ll support you, the worst sepch is not a law for Russia.
        2. Vasyatka
          Vasyatka 14 July 2015 19: 09
          0
          Yes, just bang all those who are busy with it. This, by the way, will be legal.
          1. Vasyatka
            Vasyatka 14 July 2015 20: 11
            0
            For those nonsense (?) Who set a minus: it will be really legal. Because right.
            For child molestation - as soon as possible, they go to law enforcement agencies when they cannot solve the problem themselves. Or when it is useful to find ends for other criminal cases. Here the character of molestation is persistent, public, everything is in sight and everything is clear. It is better to punish for this out of sight - the same children can see.
    5. kimyth1
      kimyth1 14 July 2015 18: 19
      +5
      organizations - discriminatory

      Policy
      3

      Photo: RIA Novosti
      The Ukrainian Foreign Ministry considers the “stop list” of non-governmental organizations drawn up in Russia, which includes three Ukrainian organizations, to be discriminatory, the Ukrainian Foreign Ministry said on Tuesday.

      On July 8, the Federation Council sent a patriotic “stop list” of 12 foreign NGOs to the Prosecutor General’s Office, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of Justice, including the World Congress of Ukrainians, the Ukrainian World Coordinating Council, and the Crimean Field Mission for Human Rights.

      “We regard this step as discriminatory and posing a threat to the preservation of national originality, identity and free development of Ukrainians in Russia. human rights, meeting the national, cultural and linguistic needs of national minorities and preventing any manifestations of their discrimination, "the statement of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine says.

      Earlier, the head of the international committee of the Federation Council, Konstantin Kosachev, said that out of 12 organizations, seven “one way or another” are related to the United States, two to Poland, three to Ukraine.

      The senator emphasized that the formation of a “stop list” is a necessary measure for Russia, and that circumstances “force us to take a number of protective measures when we see what is happening in the neighboring countries of Russia - Ukraine, Georgia, Moldova and a number of others”.

      Kosachev said that the formation by the Federation Council of a “patriotic stop list” of non-profit organizations “is directly related to the protection of the constitutional system” of Russia.

      Read on the RIA Novosti website
      Comments on the news32
      1. veksha50
        veksha50 14 July 2015 19: 22
        +2
        Quote: kimyth1
        the formation by the Federation Council of a “patriotic stop list” of non-profit organizations “is directly related to the protection of the constitutional system” of Russia.



        For a long time it was necessary to create this "stop list" ...

        And now it needs to be expanded, expanded, expanded ... Too many different organizations under different signs actually openly working against Russia in its territory ...

        PS There are still sects of various plagiarized divorced ... Tired already to drive ... Like cockroaches, they climb from all the cracks - both in the apartment, on the phone, and on the street, they are trying to start conversations ... And their eyes are like in the 90s young Hubbardites - plague and joyful ... Ugh !!!
    6. bastard
      bastard 14 July 2015 19: 38
      +3
      Quote: Baikonur
      But Russia doesn’t comply with the rights of PUSI-RAIT, which generally need to be hung by the legs in the smokehouse!

      No need in the smokehouse, we are not animals! Carve as it should, then feed it, regret it a little, and flog another 2 - 3 flog as it should. Then weeding the beets for the season, chopper in hand and - go! Repeat treatment periodically. During remission, you can give a lollipop, and if the exacerbation - cut mercilessly! You see how soon the silk will become. Well, if a steady relapse, then - here:
      1. 25ru
        25ru 15 July 2015 07: 10
        0
        And YOU put your farm and chop. Maybe the mind will be added, Although for an IDIOT it will not help.
        Ebnalichek on the avatar - corresponds to the degree of the second URYA - poetskrekatizma !.
        1. bastard
          bastard 15 July 2015 14: 21
          +1
          Quote: 25ru
          And YOU put your farm and chop. Maybe crazy add, Although

          I suggest starting with your "household". By the way, about "be added". You are probably still a young schoolboy, so I, as a senior friend, consider it my duty to help you in learning the spelling and spelling of the Russian language. I understand, the Unified State Exam and passing, but all is not lost, my young friend! So:

          As it should - reported in Google.
          -this is written if the verb answers the question "what does".
          - it’s usually supposed to appear in the verb if it answers the question “what to do”.
          Look at the root: if there is a soft sign, you need to write it. And if not, then it is not necessary.
          "B" is put:
          In the indefinite form of the verb (infinitive): “wash (s)”, “take care (s)”.
          At the end of the 2nd person singular in the present or future tense: “wash (s)”, “protect (s)”.
          After the consonants (except for “th” and “g” - lie (s)) in the forms of imperative mood: “correct (s)”.
          In the return particle (suffix), standing after the vowel sound: “I'll be back”, “come back”, “come back”, “come back”.
          In other cases, in the verb endings "b" is not put: "he went to wash", but: "he washes"

          If you don’t want to remember all this boring text, just ...
          For those who do not understand, everything is very simple.
          "-Sya" is the return particle, the abbreviation of "self."
          Say this "yourself" completely, and everything will immediately fall into place:
          he is washing = he is washing himself;
          let's wash ourselves = let's wash ourselves (“washing ourselves” also sounds in Albanian);
          Beverage is prepared = Beverage is prepared by yourself;
          the drink will be prepared = the drink will prepare itself;

          As you can see, everything is simple. And do not litter yourself with all sorts of Moscow "infinitives."
          The subordinate conjunction "although" in the sentence after the comma is written with an uppercase (lowercase, lowercase) letter, unless it is a proper name (you never know, what if?).
          In your comment, young man, there are several more errors, including punctuation and morphological ones, but for clarification, it would be better for you to contact a school teacher of the Russian language, preferably one who received higher education in the USSR. And due to my age, I already forgot a lot, although the dictation wrote perfectly well. yes
          Although, for an idiot - it will not help.

          Grow up big, study for "A" and go to a medical institute for the specialty "Psychiatry", then I will have to, willy-nilly, take this word as a diagnosis pronounced by the mouth of a specialist. And try not to be rude to your elders, but for now. ... ...
          Ebnalichek on the avatar - corresponds to the degree of the second URYA - poetskrekatizma !.

          Are you scared of the picture? Poor! You are a poor person! Do not be afraid, he does not bite and is very kind. And as for the first word, I recommend that you be careful in choosing the wording, as this is a rudely veiled obscene language and undisguised rudeness in relation to the interlocutor. Achtung! The moderator does not sleep!
          I won’t complain about you, I’ll even put you + to pay attention to my comment.
    7. forester
      forester 14 July 2015 20: 01
      +3
      Quote: Baikonur
      Right! And that already got with OWN "human rights"! They themselves have no human rights!
      But Russia doesn’t comply with the rights of PUSI-RAIT, which generally need to be hung by the legs in the smokehouse!

      So they should poke their nose at the position of Russians (non-citizens) in the Baltic states - well, the inaction of our authorities on this issue infuriates me - people are spreading rot, monuments are being demolished, Hitler’s jocks are marching on Dokle? I ask - how long? some rotten sprat eaters will humiliate those to whom they owe the fact of their existence they will yap - After the news of a recent incident with a Russian child, I caught a wagon from Lithuania on one of the cargo parking lots - forced (the torsion is the best means of persuasion) reptile to gobble up the contents of the toilet bowl - I wanted to burn the wagon, but the case is under the jurisdiction and sit for this trademark reluctance
    8. 25ru
      25ru 15 July 2015 05: 17
      0
      Maybe you with your dull-black-hundred brain trends in the smokehouse should be suspended?
      See the decisions of the ECHR, according to which the state of the Russian Federation is already tired of braiding:
      For example:
      the applicants were awarded fair compensation for non-pecuniary damage (2625 euros - Gerasimova, 9000 euros - Shmakova, 5000 euros - Baranova, 7300 euros - Kostyleva, 900 euros - Starostenkov, 9000 euros - Zakharchenko, 3500 euros - Troshina, 2600 euros - Ilnitskaya, 9000 euros - Grinko, 6500 euros - Antonova, 3900 euros - Tsvetkova) and costs (1917 euros - Kostyleva, 50 euros - Grinko);
      the remainder of the application are declared inadmissible;

      And this is so, for removing rose-colored glasses and extremely popular on the site "VO" (in, the word is what) the feces of the brain of especially gifted people: "How We SHASS Ipanem and we will win everyone":
      The respondent state, in cooperation with the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, shall, in accordance with the Convention principles laid down in the practice of the ECHR, create within one year from the date of entry into force of this judgment an effective domestic remedy or a system of such in order to ensure the proper and sufficient eradication of problems of non-execution or excessively long execution of judicial acts imposing obligations in kind for persons for which the state is responsible;
      within two years from the date of entry into force of this judgment, the respondent state must provide compensation to all victims of prolonged non-enforcement of judicial acts imposing obligations in kind for persons for which the state is liable if they applied to the ECHR before the day of the announcement of this judgment and their complaints communicated or will be communicated to the authorities of the respondent State
    9. Werterex
      Werterex 15 July 2015 16: 58
      0
      You don’t have to hang anyone. You have to bring the constitution in line. Then there will be no such excesses.
  2. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 14 July 2015 18: 04
    +12
    And so, gentlemen of the Geyropeans. Ours is ours, and we respect yours, while it does not bother us. Something like this! And I like it.
  3. MAXUZZZ
    MAXUZZZ 14 July 2015 18: 07
    +4
    In the same way, you need to cover the mouth of the OZPP, otherwise they see the accession of the Crimea not in Feng Shui
  4. tasey
    tasey 14 July 2015 18: 08
    +10
    It's high time .... "Human Rights" - HYCERS !!! In Donbass, they are not noticed at close range when punitive forces kill children, women, the elderly, using MLRS, tanks, self-propelled guns. And Yukos was "taken care of" ....
    1. veksha50
      veksha50 14 July 2015 19: 24
      +2
      Quote: tasey
      And Yukos was "taken care of" ....



      Hodor, by the way, is also a "decent" cannibal ... on his conscience there is a huge list of those killed, but who will announce it ...
  5. Petrof
    Petrof 14 July 2015 18: 08
    +4
    but they assured me that this could not be
    As for economic contracts, I hope it will be the same
  6. sever.56
    sever.56 14 July 2015 18: 10
    +16
    We must remember who wrote the Constitution of Russia: - Gaidar, Yavlinsky, Chubais, Stankevich, Sobchak, and others like them. Our "liberals" and "common people", with the help of Western advisers, have thrown so many pitfalls there that we will have to maneuver for a long time. There should be no priority of international law over national!
  7. indiggo
    indiggo 14 July 2015 18: 11
    0
    and what used to hinder? there is such a saying until the thunder strikes, the man does not cross himself ..
    1. udincev
      udincev 14 July 2015 19: 06
      +2
      Quote: indiggo
      and what used to hinder? there is such a saying until the thunder strikes, the man does not cross himself ..

      If it’s interesting what used to hinder, see the vote in the State Duma on making amendments to the constitution by reference:
      https://youtu.be/UiUX_xQtILY
      Draw conclusions. Including by his deputy, by party.
  8. Alf
    Alf 14 July 2015 18: 13
    +1
    however, "Russia may derogate from its obligations when such derogation is the only way to avoid violating the Basic Law."

    Thank God it seems they are starting to think better. And then the Geyropei court will award the return of Crimea, and our foolishly listen.
  9. Commissar of the NKVD
    Commissar of the NKVD 14 July 2015 18: 13
    +2
    The Internet is already full of screams and screams of citizens like "now we are left defenseless against Putin's system" To these individuals I have a question: do you even have an idea of ​​how to properly file a lawsuit with the ECHR? And how many Russian citizens apply there? And how often are their claims satisfied (I don't mean pusek and the like, I'm talking about ordinary people)? And then think how much people generally need all this.
    1. lidiy
      lidiy 14 July 2015 18: 36
      +3
      It would not hurt to start the ECHR with this. We won’t see anything good from him:
      "The aunt of Zaur Dadaev, accused of murdering politician Boris Nemtsov, in January 2015 sued Russia through the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) € 120 for violating Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights (right to life)," writes newspaper "Kommersant".

      The complaint from Larisa Dadaeva, the sister of Zaur Dadaev's mother, who lives in Belgium, was registered with the Strasbourg court under number 67305/10. From the materials of the case it is known that on September 24, 2001, during a special operation in the village of Alkhazurovo, Dadaeva's husband and his brother, Mayrbek Shavanov and Aslambek Shavanov, disappeared. Armed security forces broke into Dadaeva's house and took the men with them, she has not seen them since. "
      Details: http://www.regnum.ru/news/polit/1904767.html#ixzz3UGoa7gJc 
  10. GRAY
    GRAY 14 July 2015 18: 14
    +2
    Well, finally gave birth. Better late than never.
  11. sap
    sap 14 July 2015 18: 15
    +3
    Come on! They run to catch up with their hats, but the train left! Costitution had to be written in the Kremlin and not in the Capitol.
    Now there is only one way out to adopt a new one, or introduce the institution of amendments to the Constitution as in the USA. And to accept such amendments that will completely free from the dependence of the West in the field of legislation.
    1. udincev
      udincev 14 July 2015 19: 22
      0
      Quote: sap
      Now there is only one way out: to accept a new one, or to introduce the institution of amendments to the Constitution as in the USA

      Not only. You can enter changes in your own. Who is stopping this, see the link:
      https://youtu.be/UiUX_xQtILY
      Look how your deputy voted, how the party you liked behaved.
      Vobschem information for consideration!
    2. veksha50
      veksha50 14 July 2015 19: 29
      0
      Quote: sap
      And to accept such amendments that will completely free from the dependence of the West in the field of legislation.


      There (in the Constitution), as far as my memory serves me, there are not so many corrections on this issue that need to be made ... There would be a desire ...

      PS How to kick the boyars in the Duma to think faster and more efficiently ??? ... And most importantly - for the benefit of Russia, and not for "partners" ...
  12. grandfather_Kostya
    grandfather_Kostya 14 July 2015 18: 23
    0
    I would definitely rejoice at this decision, if the new constitution of the 94-year model did not contain clouds of liberal shoals and pitfalls, which "once" drown our entire sovereignty.
  13. Ram
    Ram 14 July 2015 18: 24
    +2
    The main thing is not to stop there and not take two steps back.
  14. DMoroz
    DMoroz 14 July 2015 18: 27
    +4
    This is the correct law enforcement practice and the patriotic interpretation of the Basic Law ... The precedent was created not by anyone but by the Constitutional Court
  15. meriem1
    meriem1 14 July 2015 18: 28
    +6
    Quote: Baikonur
    Right! And that already got with OWN "human rights"! They themselves have no human rights!
    But Russia doesn’t comply with the rights of PUSI-RAIT, which generally need to be hung by the legs in the smokehouse!

    Especially if you recall how the French screamed in indignation when the Femen arranged something similar in the cathedral of the French Mother of God. Although the difference between one and the other is not at all clear.
    It’s time for us to revise the Constitution in general in connection with the change in the world. Stop fighting off shrill lovers of double standards !!! We should not prove anything to anyone.
  16. kg pv
    kg pv 14 July 2015 18: 28
    0
    And now, after the refusal of the pido parade, the main pi-race Alekseyev will also stop paying?
    This creature is not sickly payments received let returns to the treasury! am
  17. ALABAY45
    ALABAY45 14 July 2015 18: 42
    +3
    "It is up to the national authorities to decide on the application of national law."
    Yes, really, I lived to see light times ?! At the beginning of the phrase "International ..." the old man's steel body began to boil, his mind smoked through his ears: courts ..., foundations ..., tribunals ..., commissions ..., parliaments ..., working groups .. ., alliances ..., missions ..., assemblies ..., monitoring ..., representations ...,
    permanent members ... involved members ... I was let go ?! feel Or, it seemed ?!
    1. veksha50
      veksha50 14 July 2015 19: 31
      +1
      Quote: ALABAY45
      Or, it seemed ?!



      Let's hope that the first step has been taken, and similar ones will follow ...
  18. Baloo
    Baloo 14 July 2015 19: 00
    +4
    “Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights are enforceable only with recognition of the supremacy of the Constitution of the Russian Federation,” the document says.

    I support. This is not negotiable. am
  19. 31rus
    31rus 14 July 2015 19: 06
    +1
    This is the theater of the absurd, when at home whatever court (court) decides and pronounces sentences, it’s that some kind of lawyer from the West will make decisions on the illegality of my actions against my neighbor at home, some kind of nonsense
  20. mikh-korsakov
    mikh-korsakov 14 July 2015 19: 13
    0
    Of course, the recognition of the supremacy of the native Constitution is a good thing. But firstly. our Constitution has many nonsense, for example, a ban on the introduction of any official ideology. It sounds bold. But, let’s say, the war began. In war, some will have to die. Well. answer me you will protect your family. But if they fight, say, in Vladivostok, and the family in Kaliningrad. Then it turns out that the family has nothing to do with it. Then why should I fight and die if the state does not give me a goal. Secondly, the devil is in the details. Let a certain killer, disguised in the clothes of a human rights defender and gaining popularity among white-collar workers on this basis, be rightly condemned among us. He didn’t like it, let’s say the conditions of detention, having been denied in our courts, he served in Strasbourg with a dressing of human rights, they don’t let you understand orange juice in Finland. The Strasbourg court is hostile to Russia (Yukos case) and filed a lawsuit against Russia. And that in our Constitution nothing is written on this issue, so pay.
    1. Petrof
      Petrof 14 July 2015 19: 46
      +1
      here is another example

      For moral damages caused by the deportation of Georgian citizens from Russia in 2006, Tbilisi demands from Moscow 70 euros, the Georgian Justice Ministry said on Friday, the correspondent of the newspaper VZGLYAD in Tbilisi reports. Georgia submitted relevant documents to the ECHR.
      A year ago, the ECHR considered Georgia’s claims justified and invited the parties to agree on the amount of compensation within 12 months.
  21. ALEA IACTA EST
    ALEA IACTA EST 14 July 2015 19: 15
    +2
    Well and rightly: there is nothing for any ECHR to meddle in our internal affairs. yes
  22. veksha50
    veksha50 14 July 2015 19: 16
    0
    "The court indicated that" Russia's participation in an international treaty does not mean renouncing state sovereignty "...

    Well, finally they started talking manly ...

    We have our own Constitution and laws developed in accordance with it ... And in general, we go our own way, and we do not need to indicate ...
  23. narval20
    narval20 14 July 2015 19: 29
    +3
    Friends! This is the basics of international law !!! What's new or surprising in clarifying the COP !?
    This is studied by cadets in the first year on "Theory of State and Law" and "Constitutional Law" :)
    You just have to remind these rams from "democracy" ONCE AGAIN that you shouldn't meddle "with your charter in someone else's garden."
  24. Petrof
    Petrof 14 July 2015 19: 30
    0
    That's just on the topic - and then we sho?
    one would like to recall one more joke - At a Russian university, where diplomats are trained, a test is carried out. It is necessary to answer the note ....

    The Ukrainian Foreign Ministry considers the “stop list” of non-governmental organizations drawn up in Russia, which includes three Ukrainian organizations, to be discriminatory, the Ukrainian Foreign Ministry said on Tuesday.

    On July 8, the Federation Council sent a patriotic “stop list” of 12 foreign NGOs to the Prosecutor General’s Office, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of Justice, including the World Congress of Ukrainians, the Ukrainian World Coordinating Council, and the Crimean Field Mission for Human Rights.

    “We regard this step as discriminatory and posing a threat to the preservation of national originality, identity and free development of Ukrainians in Russia. human rights, meeting the national, cultural and linguistic needs of national minorities and preventing any manifestations of their discrimination, "the statement of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine says.

    http://news.rambler.ru/politics/30771159/
    1. saenara
      saenara 14 July 2015 19: 59
      0
      Interestingly, and diplomats banned for using foul language?
      And the very well-known target designation for a three-word walk is suitable as an answer :-)
  25. sw6513
    sw6513 14 July 2015 19: 33
    +1
    Actually, that’s all right - the European Union is now enemy number 2. Why do we need their court? Let them judge their pinches and not stick their nose to Russia. That New York court ruled something on Russian affairs, the vultures simply went crazy.
  26. dsi
    dsi 14 July 2015 19: 38
    0
    I suppose I should live in my apartment, and not some housing and communal services.
  27. Vitaly Anisimov
    Vitaly Anisimov 14 July 2015 19: 57
    +2
    The ECHR (what an interesting phrase))) now there will be a lot of work..Ukrainians from both sides and to Russia and Ukraine (at the same time) will start filing lawsuits .. Someone will pay pennies anyway .. (such a tactic)) )) Well, there is nothing to take from Ukraine, there the PSs are already shooting each other .. Valtsman drinks and waits for the entry of Russian troops .. In general, like in the movie "Viy" and "Wedding in Malinovka" ... laughing
    And I forgot about the "Holodomor" ..!))))
  28. kuz363
    kuz363 14 July 2015 20: 04
    0
    Well, you won’t go round western lawyers either. And most importantly, the judicial decision enforcement mechanism itself is located abroad, and bailiffs do not need to go to Russia and ask to pay as it should. They simply remove the required amount from the Russian bank account there and that's it. And you can complain at least for years, it is not clear where.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. Petrof
      Petrof 14 July 2015 20: 13
      +2
      and stopped sending timber to Finland?
      because the finns were so scared
      and there would be a desire - "there would be methods for Kostya Saprykin"
  29. Vitaly Anisimov
    Vitaly Anisimov 14 July 2015 20: 49
    +1
    Quote: SHILO
    Quote: MIKHAN
    Are you complaining about your homeland? Here are your key words .. hi You are slippery .. I immediately understood it .. Has the ECHR already filed a complaint or are you just collecting materials ..? Do not forget to mention me there)))) I will sign everything about how I violated your "rights" ... heh heh You were an "awl" in Ukraine and in Russia you will be the same (only more loud) "Human rights" should be observed especially in deep rear of Russia! Be careful not to overdo it "awl" ...


    Listen buddy. I regard you as adequate. But I see rarely mistaken ...

    I'm not your friend ... and hear .. This is a liberal expression (often used) Do you have a gang here clearly? I’ve seen such people here ... Are you angry that I'm right ..? The article was about the ECHR (European Court of Human Rights ..) Judging by your minuses to my comments, do you respect him? And going to write tons of pennies to demand ..? You are our integrator deep in Russia .. Let's rest! I’ll have to earn you an allowance tomorrow .. Look, don’t choke when you will have breakfast .. hi
  30. chunga-changa
    chunga-changa 14 July 2015 20: 53
    0
    I do not even know. It is precisely in the constitution that it is quite clearly stated that in this case, international law has supremacy over Russian law, and it is precisely the constitutional judges who should know about this perfectly well, in theory: Article 15, clause 4 "... provided by law, the rules of the international treaty apply. " article 46, paragraph 3 "Everyone has the right, in accordance with international treaties of the Russian Federation, to apply to interstate bodies for the protection of human rights and freedoms, if all available domestic remedies have been exhausted." That's all, there is an international treaty on the recognition of the ECtHR verdicts, and these verdicts are higher than Russian laws, according to our own constitution. It is not entirely clear what they are doing now, before making such statements, you first need to amend the constitution and terminate a couple of agreements, and only then make statements. Interestingly, at least one professional stayed there to explain to these "lawyers" that they should do everything strictly according to the law, and not when they suddenly wanted to.
  31. Uncle Joe
    Uncle Joe 14 July 2015 21: 12
    +2
    Cop deals with cheap populism

    The judge explained that "the Convention on Human Rights is an integral part of the legal system of the Russian Federation", however, "Russia may depart from the obligations imposed on it, when such a derogation is the only way to avoid violation of the Basic Law."

    And commentators write "urya" and "approvals" ...

    It goes without saying that the proverb about the category of people to whom the law is not written.

    Article 15. 1. The Constitution of the Russian Federation has the highest legal force, direct effect and applies throughout the territory of the Russian Federation. Laws and other legal acts adopted in the Russian Federation shall not contradict the Constitution of the Russian Federation.

    Article 125. 6. Acts or their individual provisions recognized as unconstitutional lose their force; international treaties of the Russian Federation that do not comply with the Constitution of the Russian Federation are not subject to entry into force and application.
  32. The comment was deleted.
  33. taksist
    taksist 14 July 2015 21: 14
    +1
    How to divide pennies. so they are right there ... And the fact that people are being killed in Donetsk - so. "not our dilo"? ....
  34. Sanain
    Sanain 14 July 2015 21: 32
    -2
    I agree with the comments above, it's high time !!!
  35. Oman 47
    Oman 47 14 July 2015 21: 52
    0
    Still, the law of the Russian Federation "On the Central Bank of the Russian Federation" should be brought in line with NATIONAL INTERESTS ...
  36. udincev
    udincev 14 July 2015 22: 06
    0
    First you need to change the status of the Central Bank in the constitution.
    Tried ...
    Information for consideration who and why prevented:

    https://youtu.be/UiUX_xQtILY
  37. haak1970
    haak1970 14 July 2015 22: 14
    +1
    That's right, Ks decided!
  38. iwakura
    iwakura 14 July 2015 22: 20
    +1
    As I understand it, international laws cannot contradict the constitution by this decision of the Constitutional Court. Well, it begs for itself.
    but since the supremacy of international law over Russian is spelled out in the constitution, criminal, civil, etc. cases considered by the ECHR and generally not contrary to the constitution, but contradictions to the Russian Criminal Code, the Civil Code ... will be decided in favor of the ECHR
    in short, it is necessary to amend the constitution in favor of observance of national interests, and paragraph 15.4, which is mentioned here, should be rewritten in the reverse version.
    1. Uncle Joe
      Uncle Joe 14 July 2015 23: 09
      -2
      Quote: iwakura
      As I understand it, international laws cannot contradict the constitution by this decision of the Constitutional Court
      Misunderstood.
      1 International laws do not exist.
      2 The constitution initially spelled out the impossibility of contradicting any norms to it.

      but since the supremacy of international law over Russian is spelled out in the constitution
      The supremacy of international law over Russian is spelled out only in the inflamed consciousness of individual inhabitants.

      in short, it is necessary to change the constitution in favor of observance of national interests
      Will it not be difficult for you to list these mysterious national interests?

      and clause 15.4 of which we are talking about here, rewrite in reverse.
      In the sense that we sign contracts, but we don’t undertake to comply with them? laughing
      1. iwakura
        iwakura 15 July 2015 00: 47
        0
        Quote: Uncle Joe
        International laws do not exist.

        do not find fault with the letters. I was referring to the recognition of the ECHR by a higher court, and, accordingly, the laws of this "court" prevail over the Russian ones.
        Quote: Uncle Joe
        In the sense that we sign contracts, but we don’t undertake to comply with them?

        again, malice is out of place - on the contrary, this does not mean more important international law, but Russian, in the event of a contradiction.

        to national interests - at least the fact that any pederast can now sue this court, such as "infringing upon his rights in freedom to openly demonstrate his pederastic affiliation"
        1. Uncle Joe
          Uncle Joe 15 July 2015 01: 50
          -2
          Quote: iwakura
          don't find fault with the letters
          Do not spell incorrect letters.

          I was referring to the recognition of the ECHR by a higher court, and, accordingly, the laws of this "court" prevail over the Russian
          The Russian Federation recognized the ECHR through the voluntary signing of a convention on the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms.
          At the same time, the ECHR is not the highest authority in relation to the judicial system of the Russian Federation, and does not adhere to non-existent laws, but to the provisions of the convention, which do not put pressure on the legislation of the Russian Federation, but comply with it (and only to the extent that the constitution allows the Russian Federation).

          again, malice is out of place - on the contrary, this does not mean more important international law, but Russian, in the event of a contradiction
          Yah? laughing

          International law is a set of norms and principles establishing mutual rights and obligations of states and regulating international relations.
          The sources of international law are treaties, customs and principles. The norms of international law are created in the course of negotiations between various entities, are formalized by appropriate treaties and operate on the principle of "not signed - not obliged to comply".

          Does the very phrase "BETWEEN-the people's right" mean anything to you?

          to national interests - at least the fact that any pederast can now sue this court, such as "infringing upon his rights in freedom to openly demonstrate his pederastic affiliation"
          Who about what, and lousy about the bath, or who hurts something ...

          You should not attribute your problems in relations with one of the categories of unhealthy citizens to national interests, which you also did not list.
  39. atamankko
    atamankko 14 July 2015 22: 44
    0
    Western stinkers tired of burping.
  40. sap
    sap 15 July 2015 01: 02
    0
    Something is not clear is this a site in or xxx? Is there really no more significant topic than transgender and pederasts in westuntergang &
  41. radar1967
    radar1967 15 July 2015 03: 00
    0
    It is very effective to force the enemy to pay for processes that destroy his own structures. This is aerobatics management. This is the method of work of the Western elite. See a lot of interesting things. http://www.echr.ru/documents/decisions.htm
    The Western elite is their main weapon. For example: during the Crimean War (mid 19th century) they managed to convince the Russian command to shoot their own fleet in the Sevastopol bay. The deceived Russian generals with cannons removed from the ships destroyed a total of 91 Russian ships. Constantinople then again remained Istanbul. http://topwar.ru/60347-zachem-zataplivayut-sobstvennye-korabli.html
    http://www.liveinternet.ru/users/3330352/post109272378/
  42. DimYang
    DimYang 15 July 2015 04: 31
    0
    Finally, the progress. But this is still half measure. In the Constitution it is necessary to directly write the SUPREME OF THE NATIONAL LAW OVER INTERNATIONAL.
  43. KvVtSr
    KvVtSr 15 July 2015 07: 42
    +2
    Yes, why are we talking?
    in our country, there has long been a separation of society from the constitution ...
    The Constitutional Court does not even put the CONSTITUTION into anything !!!
    look at the decisions that are made by judges of both the district level and the Supreme Court ... not to mention the other branches of government ...
    in addition, the president of the constitutional court once in the spring himself declared that there was a gap in the country between the constitution and society ...
    until we change our attitude to what is happening and start asking uncomfortable questions to the leaders of the branches of government why there is a law for some, but not for others, and until the Law in our country becomes one for everyone, there’s a mess in both the country and international arnene to our homeland will be such an attitude ...
  44. kartalovkolya
    kartalovkolya 15 July 2015 08: 53
    +1
    To be objective, first of all it is necessary to determine the following: 1) who wrote our Constitution; 2) in whose interests it works; 3) what should be done with the Basic Law of the country !? Otherwise, the impression was created that the Constitution was written and works in favor of our most sworn "friends", and the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation protects criminals, and not respectable and law-abiding citizens (at least take the articles "On Self-Defense"), you read and wonder how did not "thieves in law" write the Criminal Code on their "raspberries" (I beg your pardon in the offices) ?! This is what we need to think carefully about now, because the ELECTIONS are coming, and from what and whom we elect, we will live! In short, "All to the polls!" and "Saryn to the kichka!"
    1. bulatovvvas
      bulatovvvas 15 July 2015 14: 41
      +1
      It looks like a pre-election sounding of the topics around which the struggle for the electorate will go. The degree of "comments" began to rise and there were not many "suddenly" left before the elections!
  45. goose
    goose 15 July 2015 17: 11
    +2
    Quote: sovetskyturist
    If other rules are established by an international treaty of the Russian Federation than those provided by law, the rules of the international treaty shall apply.

    In the US Constitution, other priorities are exactly the opposite, in case of conflict, the priority of the Constitution in relation to international treaties is recognized.
  46. Svetovod
    Svetovod 16 July 2015 07: 36
    -1
    And where is the convention on human obligations? Where there are rights and responsibilities.
  47. vladimirw
    vladimirw 16 July 2015 12: 12
    0
    well that such a solution came out