Su-24 again

Su-24 again



At six hours two minutes Moscow time on October 20, 2011 a tragedy occurred - on Amurskaya aviation the base (military unit 62266) crashed a military aircraft Su-24, assigned to military unit 23326, there are victims.

The aircraft followed the Vozdvizhenka Aviation Repair Plant to Ussuriysk for scheduled repairs. At the aviation base "Ukrainka" the bomber was to be refilled, but when landing on the Su-24 landing strip the front landing gear broke, the bomber began to dig the ground with its nose, turned over and exploded, the pilots of the plane Major Oleg Noskov and Major Vitaly Novoseltsev died on the spot .

The fire engines tried to extinguish the burning remains of the aircraft for several hours, military experts and investigators from the Eastern Military District are working at the accident site, and specialists from Moscow are expected to arrive. In the military unit raise the documentation of the flight and recording the crew talks with the dispatchers.

On a bomber by happy coincidence there was no ammunition that could lead to larger casualties. At the moment, a criminal case has been initiated (article 351 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation “Violation of flight rules”).

The Ministry of Defense ordered all military units of the Russian army to immediately inspect aircraft and report on the technical condition of the vehicles.

According to one of the preliminary versions, a catastrophe occurred due to a malfunctioning drive or a broken landing gear while trying to stop the plane on the runway.

This is the latest Su-24 plane crash from a long list of accidents with this type of bombers.

The first Su-24 flight incident happened in March 2006, then the Su-24М bomber crashed in the south-west of Voronezh, the pilots managed to eject, no one was injured. A case was also initiated under the same article, but the results have not yet been officially announced. Unofficially - wear and tear of aircraft equipment. In the same year, two more accidents occur Su-24, near Kaliningrad and in Primorye. The pilots successfully ejected. The cause of the accidents is bad weather conditions, the pilots did not cope with the control.
The following incident occurs in the Khabarovsk Territory at the end of August 2007. The Su-24 crashes, the pilots successfully eject.

The next flight incident occurs in mid-December 2008 year. When performing flight training bomber from the same regiment crashes in Kashirsky area, near the village Mosalskoe. Again the same article, and the result is not officially made public. Unofficially, according to the pilots, several hydraulic systems failed.

In mid-June, two bombers crashed 2009. At Monchegorsk airport falls on the Su-24MR landing strip, after the crash the plane completely burned out. Pilots ejected, no casualties. The official version of the incident is not made public. In the Rostov region crashes Su-24, pilots eject. The official version is not made public. Unofficial - failure to turn the wing.

The penultimate accident that occurred with the Su-24, happened in mid-February 2010, at the Pushkin military airfield. The aircraft ignited for some unknown reason after landing, after dropping the braking parachute. The pilots tried to shoot down the fire, but the bomber burned to the ground. The crash investigation is over; there are no official reports of what happened.

The bomber is considered very difficult to manage and has a very high accident rate.

Only on testing prototypes was 14 machines lost. From 2000 to 2011, the loss of Su-24 serial combat aircraft in the Russian Air Force amounted to 15 machines.

The Air Force took measures to modernize the Su-24 aircraft, and after a thorough investigation of the latest crash, it is planned to decide to modernize the 70% of the Su-24 aircraft, which means that by the year 2020, the Rossi Air Force will have several hundred Su-34 aircraft, and the rest are being upgraded to the М2 project.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

15 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Ion coaelung
    Ion coaelung 24 October 2011 10: 04 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Sad And to check the condition of the device, can it fly to the repair? Probably a weakness again ...
    1. Vadivak 24 October 2011 12: 48 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      Negligence of technicians? They will not be able to see microcracks in the landing gear and will not determine "metal fatigue."

      The plane, as rightly pointed out by Vladimr Belugin
      Quote: vlbelugin
      He flew for repairs. .
      therefore, replacement of components and assemblies was required. Only after the conclusion of the commission (if it is) can conclusions be drawn.
      And about ammunition, this is of course "a director’s find."
  2. vlbelugin 24 October 2011 10: 40 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    I’m a fuey from the author. Why horror stories?
    Fortunately, the bomber was missing ammunition, which could lead to larger casualties.
    He flew for repairs. There is no need for ammunition.
    There are equipment and people. Therefore, victims cannot be avoided. Whatever technique is perfect, it can refuse. What masters would not be people, they can be mistaken.
    Airplanes crashed, are falling and will fall. The ships were drowning, drowning and will sink. This is the flip side of technological progress.
    And our media organize a show of these catastrophes.
  3. svvaulsh
    svvaulsh 24 October 2011 11: 55 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    So the “guarantor” will read the article, and then declare that the planes are bad and should be purchased abroad, albeit to the detriment of their own industry. Here, the amers will be fussed, removed from the preservation of the F-111, put their lips in the air and push the iPhone down.
  4. Sergh
    Sergh 24 October 2011 13: 50 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    How much can you masturbate this accident, well, nothing is known! I would also stick, such as a pilot, put the apparatus or runway all holes in the potholes on the front rack of the chassi. And then did not have time to fall, already terribly catching up.
  5. Sergh
    Sergh 24 October 2011 13: 54 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    How much can you masturbate this accident, well, nothing is known! I would also stick, such as a pilot, put the apparatus or runway all holes in the potholes on the front rack of the chassi. And then did not have time to fall, already terribly catching up.
    In, outside the window from “Chkalovsogo” another Su-34 for a month climbed up the mountain. It’s a pity they don’t climb from the hard pictures, otherwise I would have thrown them now. Then I’ll try to drop the site onto some thread, and then forward it here.
    1. Simfi
      Simfi 24 October 2011 17: 16 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      And what does it mean to "mountaineer"?
      1. Sergh
        Sergh 24 October 2011 18: 37 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        And what does it mean to "mountaineer"?

        With the runway, a candle sharply rises up to 700-1000 m, a loop, a couple of barrels, a turn at the peak and for landing.
        1. svvaulsh
          svvaulsh 25 October 2011 12: 04 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          And what? Do you have no aerobatic zones there?
          1. Sergh
            Sergh 25 October 2011 23: 47 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            I have a window in a kilometer there is NAPO them. “Chkalov,” they driving another Sukhar-34 from the shop, they immediately lift him into the sky above their territory with a short aerobatic program. And besides, this is the outskirts of the city.
            1. sirToad
              sirToad 26 October 2011 06: 37 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              all the same, you can’t go to Novosib with your Shpien pataparats!
  6. Denis 25 October 2011 01: 04 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    According to one of the preliminary versions, a catastrophe occurred due to a malfunctioning drive or a broken landing gear while trying to stop the plane on the runway.

    experts are still sorting out, but ... from the "crash" program are ready to tell EVERYTHING about the crash
    here are jackals unconventional
    it seems to me that censorship is not all bad
    1. Banshee 25 October 2011 12: 17 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Often censorship is very good. Because the cries of nonprofessionals who are professionals in watering by shit everything and everyone are filtered. Who know everything about everything.

      In short, give censorship !!!
  7. gmajor 25 October 2011 19: 25 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The first Su-24 plane crash happened in March 2006
    SU-24s have been flying since the 70s of the last century, so this is not the first disaster.
  8. AlexAl 26 October 2011 06: 37 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Oh how! On Wikipedia, the report has already been cooked up:
    “On October 20, 2011 at 06:02 Moscow time, when landing at the Ukrainka airdrome in the Amur Region, the front landing gear broke off at a bomber, the plane“ on its belly ”took off the runway, it caught fire and turned over. The crew of the aircraft is pilot and navigator of the majors Oleg Noskov and Vitaly Novoselsky died immediately "
    And 2006, the beginning of accidents, was probably taken from there.
    Bright memory to pilots.
  9. sancho 26 October 2011 17: 50 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Yes .... Earth they rest in peace! Sorry. Guys from our Voronezh Baltimore. Technique damn ... all the old. Do not fix it. Almost three years ago, we fell 24, both hydraulic circuits came out, the main and the backup, the flyers say they don’t remember this, so that two circuits jumped at once. Fortunately, both pilots ejected.

    The stand broke down, who looks at metal fatigue ... so visually.