Video: "Iron dome" knocks drones

Specialists of the Israeli defense concern "Raphael" made a video on which you can see how the Iron Dome missile defense system is shooting down two unmanned aerial vehicles, reports NEWSru.co.il with reference to Walla news. The video was intended for internal use, but was made freely available.

It is noted that employees of the concern handed over the video to a journalist as part of a marketing company, without informing the Ministry of Defense and the security service. Soon the video was posted on YouTube.

At the moment, the Israeli Defense Ministry is investigating the circumstances of the “leakage”, and this is also the company “Raphael”. In addition, representatives of the group said that the published video has nothing to do with the tests, which the Israeli Ministry of Defense reported last week.

Comments

[Same lech]

No professor laid out .... bravo.

Israel keeps its secrets very well (VANUNU paid 11 years of his life as an example to violators of the Israeli secretaries of Israel) and I do not believe in leakage.

[prosto_rgb]

Quote: The same LYOKHA

Israel keeps its secrets very well

And rightly so!
About the video - it's beautiful.
I think single rockets from the MLRS are harder to destroy than a drone, so there’s nothing to be surprised at.
The only question is what would this very drone be detected in a timely manner.

[zao74]

The Israeli defense department is currently investigating the circumstances of the "leak"

Come on, say so - PR company ... otherwise there is a leak, a leak.

[Duke]

"Iron Dummy" - tactical missile defense system designed to protect against unguided tactical missiles at ranges from 4 to 70 kilometers. Developed by the Israeli company Rafael.
Each battery can protect an area of ​​150 square kilometers.
The first battery went on alert in March 2011; As of July 2014, combat duty is carried by 9 batteries throughout Israel. By the end of the 2014 of the year, 1200 missiles were successfully shot down with the Iron Dome batteries.
Battery composition
Multipurpose radar station (radar) EL / M-2084 company ELTA Systems. Designed to accurately identify the target and determine the trajectory of its flight. Since about 75% of Kassam missiles do not hit the target, the radar calculates the trajectory and does not issue an intercept command if, according to calculations, the missile falls into an uninhabited area. This allows you to significantly reduce the financial costs of using the Iron Dome.
Fire control center. Time from detecting a target to launching an interceptor missile: a few seconds.
Three launchers with 20 th Tamir interceptor missiles. Missile length: 3 m, diameter: 160 mm, mass: 90 kg. The warhead has a non-contact fuse.

[monk10]

The video talks about the height of the target hit at 50 km !!! Are they serious? The length of 3 m and a diameter of 0,16 m somehow does not fit in with such heights. If only the distance is not 1 km. Then why do they write 70 km? Jews are able to advertise.

[voyaka uh]

for monk10:
"Length 3 m and diameter 0,16" ///

This rocket is almost entirely plastic, very light.
Therefore, it reaches a very high speed. Besides.
although it’s small, it’s two-stage. And very maneuverable, moreover.
When the first step brings her to the target and her seeker catches the target,
the 2nd stage is turned on - a furious jerk and defeat.
I saw it with my own eyes (several times) last summer.
Interception of Grad missiles (Iranian design) with an extended trajectory.

[monk10]

Is 300 m / s high speed? For information, the speed of sound is 331 m / s. Those. Subsonic rocket. The BUK-2m has a speed of up to 1230 m / s and an overload of 24 g, with a length of 5 m and a diameter of 0,36 m. At the same time, the range is up to 50 km and the height is 25 km. The 3rd is planned for 70 and 35 km, respectively. Conclusion: advertising should be shown on TV between programs. At the same time, I consider the LCD a worthy development with good prospects.

[voyaka uh]

for monk10:
"Is 300 m / s a ​​high speed?" ///

Not 300, but 700 m / s. To intercept those speed targets for which
it is designed - small Grad missiles - is enough.

[GRAY]

Quote: Professor

IMHO thrust only on the accelerator.

I don’t see the propeller there, but I see a couple of nozzles. Israel mastered the engine on new principles?

[Professor]

Quote: GRAY

I don’t see the propeller there, but I see a couple of nozzles. Israel mastered the engine on new principles?

I was wrong. There are two turbines.

[opus]

Quote: Professor

But they glow very well in the IR range. There are no drones.

And?
Tamir has an active radar seeker,

and the interceptor receives data from the multi-purpose EL / M-2084 radar from ELTA Systems before launch and the target path


There is an IK signature or not ... Kipat barzel is "on the drum", he works on shells from artillery and mortars



=========================================
the only difference is a successful approach to the target, and unsuccessful

respectively, and the result

[aleks 62]

..... Unless the distance is 1 km. Then why do they write 70 km? Jews are able to advertise .....

..... Advertising .... At a rocket speed of 300 m / s up to 50 km, it needs to fly about 2,5 minutes .... I think the height is 5 km, not 50 km .... The dimensions of the rocket are about the same as those of the early Sidewinder , and this is "air-to-air" close combat, with a range of 10-12 km ..... By the way, her fuel burns out in 1,5-2 seconds ....

[opus]

Quote: aleks 62

At a rocket speed of 300 m / s up to 50 km, it needs to fly about 2,5 minutes .... I think the height is 5 km, not 50 km .... The dimensions of the rocket are about the same as those of the early Sidewinder.

1.Not 300m / s, no data but on the knee at least 700-800 m / s

2. Not heights (at a height of 50 km, there are no hailstones, UAVs, shells and airplanes, all the more so,against Iskanler or what?),And the range of interception 4-70 km

And the height of interception to 10 km, from .... the manufacturer is silent
Tamir: Missile length - 3 m, Diameter - 160 mm, weight 90kg, two-stage she (Tsiolkovsky!), does not drag empty containers

AIM-9 Sidewinder Length: 2,85 m, Diameter: 0,127 m, Weight: 91 kg

everything seems to be similar? only the weight of the shell Tamira MUCH LESS
not an IR seeker, and no need to cool.

ARLGSN is easier

And on the radar of the AGSN, Israel is almost a leader

4. Warheads are lighter,% on 40 (interception heights are not the same: air density for explosives), targets are not those

[padded jacket]

Quote: monah10

The video talks about the height of the target hit at 50 km !!! Are they serious? The length of 3 m and a diameter of 0,16 m somehow does not fit in with such heights. If only the distance is not 1 km. Then why do they write 70 km? Jews are able to advertise.

Most likely another Israeli tale, they like to invent and compose
Although two drones Israel recently lost over Lebanon, the first is true, the Israeli Air Force bombed themselves after it "fell", but the second Lebanese fished out almost the whole of the sea.
I wonder where he will then be sent? Most likely to Iran or Russia to study.
Lebanon: Israeli drone fell into our sea
Lebanese media report this morning, July 11, that an Israeli reconnaissance unmanned aircraft crashed into the sea off the coast of that country.
The crash occurred opposite the Lebanese Tripoli in the north of the country. The army blocked the crash site during the search period.
Later on Twitter the Lebanese army published photos of the UAV and its recovery from the water.

http://9tv.co.il/news/2015/07/11/208503.html

[Silkway0026]

Advertising trick! What a leak there ... The next leaked video will be like Bonce The dome knocks down kites)))

[opus]

Quote: prosto_rgb

The only question is what would this very drone be detected in a timely manner.

Do you think RS (length 2,8 m, diameter 0,122m, weight 50 kg) from MLRS is easier to detect than UAVs?

if the interception is successful, then the Tamir interceptor missile hits the RS launched by Hamas, and it flies into the ground at an acute angle. At the same time, the inversion traces of the rocket are direct and short. If something does not work, then the tracks take the form of loops, i.e. Hamas rocket is struck from behind or from the side. Rocket (RS) in this case stray from its direction of flight.

not a single UAV yet gives the speed of 500-600m / s

[Kaiten]

Quote: opus

Do you think RS (length 2,8 m, diameter 0,122m, weight 50 kg) from MLRS is easier to detect than UAVs?

I think it’s easier. many drones are almost completely plastic (in the sense of composite materials), unlike the metal body of a hail shell. Of course the drone is a drone.

[opus]

Quote: The same LYOKHA

Israel keeps its secrets very well

Why "store something"?
Does the iron dome confidently shoot down UAVs?
Eka is unseen.
If the Tamir interceptor (interceptor warhead) successfully destroys the Kassam missile and the 122-mm Grad missile (speed 500-600 m / s, it seems), what does the UAV (the essence of U-2 in speed) not take it?

RAfael has long been SPECIFIED BY ADVERTISING PERSPECTIVE ABOUT THIS

The Iron Dome is the only dual mission system in the world that provides an
effective defense solution for countering rockets, artillery & mortars (C-RAM) as well
as aircraft, helicopters, UAVs, PGMs. / ... which provides effective protection against missiles, artillery and mortar shells (C-RAM), as well as aircraft, helicopters, UAVs, etc.

/ This news is "hot".

[Mountain shooter]

Good but not enough. Find out how their guidance system and proximity fuse work? And most importantly, how do they see him? What radar? These drones are so small, and certainly even half made of plastic.

[kolyhalovs]

Ummm ... Can this video clarify anything? Does it really have any value in itself? Or is all the boron cheese exclusively from the one in the house? I don’t understand anything.

[31rus]

I think by optical channel, but doubts take that this is the work of the "dome"

[GRAY]

Quote: Mountain Shooter

These drones are so small, and certainly even half made of plastic.

At the beginning, they show the device, this is clearly a special and rather big target.
The Iron Dome is capable of shooting down aircraft - well, congratulations.

[Wedmak]

I will join the opinion, obviously not a military application.

[voyaka uh]

for GRAY:

"Well, congratulations." ///

Thank you, at least someone is polite .

Whole chip of testing is that one and the same system and one
and the same rocket can distinguish and shoot down like fast-flying
targets (Grad / Tornado-class missiles) and slow targets like UAVs.
Moreover, both high and low flying.

Usually different means are used for such different tasks.

[GRAY]

Quote: voyaka uh

Whole chip of testing is that one and the same system and one
and the same rocket can distinguish and shoot down like fast-flying
targets (Grad / Tornado-class missiles) and slow targets like UAVs.
Moreover, both high and low flying.

I think that the trick here is different - the system was "taught" to hit maneuvering targets.

[Revolver]

Quote: Mountain Shooter

These drones are so small, and certainly even half made of plastic.

"Grads" and products of "amateur technical creativity" of the Palestinians also do not differ in a large effective area of ​​the reflecting surface, nevertheless, the LCD radar captures them stably. Most likely it was Raphael who modified the software so that the system could determine the type of target and, accordingly, calculate the likely trajectory.
It seems that the potential to work not only on missiles, but also on aircraft of all classes was laid down in the LCD initially, it was just that hands did not reach to realize it, there were more important topics. Ask what? Well, at least an increase in the probability of hitting missiles (after all, this is the main task, and aviation targets are secondary, and there were no aircraft from the most likely opponents), or a reduction in the cost of missiles. And just as hezbalons and Hamas got drones, their hands reached. It seems that the missile defense missile launcher not only smashes drones into the trash, but it will not seem like a fighter or helicopters to class targets.

[atalef]

Quote: Nagan

Quote: Mountain Shooter

These drones are so small, and certainly even half made of plastic.

"Grads" and products of "amateur technical creativity" of the Palestinians also do not differ in a large effective area of ​​the reflecting surface, nevertheless, the LCD radar captures them stably. Most likely it was Raphael who modified the software so that the system could determine the type of target and, accordingly, calculate the likely trajectory.
It seems that the potential to work not only on missiles, but also on aircraft of all classes was laid down in the LCD initially, it was just that hands did not reach to realize it, there were more important topics. Ask what? Well, at least an increase in the probability of hitting missiles (after all, this is the main task, and aviation targets are secondary, and there were no aircraft from the most likely opponents), or a reduction in the cost of missiles. And just as hezbalons and Hamas got drones, their hands reached. It seems that the missile defense missile launcher not only smashes drones into the trash, but it will not seem like a fighter or helicopters to class targets.

In general, yes, LCD modifications are generally a change in algorithms and software

[Altona]

Quote: Mountain Shooter

Good but not enough. Find out how their guidance system and proximity fuse work? And most importantly, how do they see him? What radar? These drones are so small, and certainly even half made of plastic.

---------------------
What is the value of this video? That there is a downing of a low-flying subsonic non-magnetic target? And what? Crap with the music ...

[31rus]

The staff is clearly written there, so it turns out, as it were, is not a leak, but not a permitted commercial, I think the investigation will quickly find those involved

[Same lech]

investigation will quickly find involved

Yeah, they’ll write a prize ... half a bucket of skiing ... and with gramophone needles ... an advertising leak has already occurred ... potential buyers are lining up

How interesting is the word limiter on HBO ....

I write skip ... a gift and issued ski .... the reverse side of the censorship of the words of the Russian language ..... impossible to communicate normally.

[Revolver]

Quote: The same LYOKHA

I write skip ... a gift and issued ski .... the reverse side of the censorship of the words of the Russian language ..... impossible to communicate normally.

Use Latin letters of a similar shape, and everything will work out. Like this:
turpentine

[31rus]

So stop! I watched the video and how can you understand that it was the "iron dome" that shot down? The sky, drones, and where is the work of the "dome"? The shooting is strange, it does not look like an advertisement

[Stalker.1977]

I absolutely agree, for example, when our videos were shown, the work of the complexes themselves was visible.

[ALEA IACTA EST]

They shot down a drone, well done.
But what about real planes and cruise / ballistic missiles?

[Норд]

They shot down a drone - an awesome achievement, and before that, no one had ever done this ...
150 sq. Km is 10x15 km ... and how many such domes are needed to cover the whole country?!?
What is the likelihood of hitting maneuvering targets for this prodigy?
Well, in conclusion, I have a question: what, VO turns into an advertising platform for the Israeli military-industrial complex?

[Kaiten]

Quote: Nord

and how many such domes are needed to cover the whole country?!?

why the whole country? only cities and large military bases.

[stonks]

For ballistic, there are other systems.
Israel’s missile defense system is either 3 or 4 levels.

[just exp]

yes, they have there ischo khets, an arrow on ours.

[WE ARE MAKING]

Today is just the end of negotiations on Iran ... This is flowing from Israel ... here and the video has flowed ... as it were.

[Kaiten]

Quote: AGAIN

It flowed from Israel ... that’s the video leaked ... as if.

you and others like you then don’t say that Israel committed an act of aggression against Iran.

[ibu355yandex.ru]

More like a "marketing campaign" action. No secrets are open, but the fact of the existence of such a weapon is obvious! No one is sitting still in this area of ​​exploding drone use. Although the effectiveness of the use of the "Iron Dome", judging by the above materials, remains in question.

[Styx]

What a dumb "leak" already flowed straight to the Internet, straight to youtube. Not missed

[Corsair0304]

Well, it worked and okay. That's why it was created. Of course, it would be interesting to know more about what is described in the article: which drones, speed, altitude, etc. Well, at least the approximate performance characteristics of the "Iron Dome" what it is and what it is eaten with. It is suitable, for example, against hypersonic missiles and all sorts of other things. So to speak, to improve horizons))

[31rus]

Type on the website search for "iron dome" something you will find on performance characteristics

[31rus]

Where did you see that it was a dome, was it determined by the rocket? You can write and show it and the UFO was shot down, but it will not be true, and if Raphael advertises, then there are beautiful footage and information, and this is a "muddy" story and the main thing is nothing

[bmv04636]

And, and shouldn't air defense have to bring down all these air shnigi?

[yanus]

Drones of this size and the S-75 will bring down. They would also have trained to shoot at the airship.

[Urri]

A drone worth 2 thousand bucks rocket worth 50 thousand? Yes, in the place of Hesbollah, I would immediately build a plant for the production of these drones.

[Dan4eG]

Nuka nuka, where can I buy a UAV for 2 thousand?

[Corsair]

Quote: Urri

A drone worth 2 thousand bucks rocket worth 50 thousand? Yes, in the place of Hesbollah, I would immediately build a plant for the production of these drones.

So they are not properly organized and there are many corrupt skins inside, if they build a factory, the Jews will bomb it as soon as possible. And of course, it’s easy to ruin the Jews with the appropriate cooperation and light mobile launchers.

[atalef]

[quote = Corsair] [quote = Urri] And of course, ruining the Jews is easy with appropriate cooperation and lightweight mobile launchers. [/ quote]
Ruin the Jews - well - well

[Corsair]

Quote: atalef

Ruin the Jews - well - well

You can ruin anyone with proper preparation and attention
Well, in this case, everything is simple: your dummies and traders are barging with Arab oil traders and traders who pay these lovers a shot at Israel. Therefore, mostly different trifles are fired and a separate rifleman has self-made garbage like firecrackers, and there will be no mass and prepared rocket attacks.

[Kaiten]

Quote: Urri

2 thousand bucks

2 kilo-satellite powered unmanned vehicles exist? Give two. Proofs Karl. where do they sell it?

[Engineer]

What is it? Shot down two subsonic non-maneuvering targets in greenhouse conditions and boast? This is a task for MANPADS and not even for Willow, and here Arrow to cope.

[Dan4eG]

http://topwar.ru/78765-v-astrahanskoy-oblasti-raschety-tor-m2u-unichtozhili-shes

t-samanov.html

and what eulogies there were! the whole spectrum, from "throwing tori" to "a red stumped stump to all of them to tonsils"!

[atalef]

Quote: Engineer

What is it? Shot down two subsonic non-maneuvering targets in greenhouse conditions and boast? This is a task for MANPADS and not even for Willow, and here Arrow to cope.

None of these MANPADS unmanned aerial vehicles of such small sizes will not hit. IMHO

[GRAY]

Quote: atalef

None of these MANPADS unmanned aerial vehicles of such small sizes will not hit. IMHO

Are you talking about this jet thrust fetter? It will hit easily.

[Professor]

The screensaver in the video was not removed by Rafael during the test, but was stripped from the site of the target manufacturer, which suggests the authenticity of at least this part of the video.

[Ascetic]

In July 2014 There was noise when two Abadil-1 reconnaissance UAVs of Iranian production were shot down at a cost of less than 50 thousand green Patriot missiles worth 3 million.

the increase in the efficiency of the "Iron Dome" air defense system was paid for by the transition to more complex, from the more expensive modifications of missiles, which raised the cost of one shot from the initial 60 thousand dollars to the current 100 thousand. According to official sources, in three years (from March 2011 to July 2014) The Iron Dome has successfully shot down 1200 real aerial targets. Including both drones at 40-50 thousand dollars apiece, and home-made missiles "Qassam", costing the Palestinians hardly 5 thousand dollars. Accurate statistics on what types of missiles the specified targets "Iron Dome" worked, but all the same, Israel spent at least $ 100 million on missiles alone, excluding maintenance and other costs.

link

[fax66]

To use the "Iron Dome" to combat UAVs is, in my opinion, too expensive a pleasure.
There one rocket costs a lot of money ....

[atalef]

Quote: fax66

To use the "Iron Dome" to combat UAVs is, in my opinion, too expensive a pleasure.
There one rocket costs a lot of money ....

3500-3000 $ is no money for a long time, especially for us

[IS-80]

Quote: atalef

3500-3000 $ is no money for a long time, especially for us

Mossad captured the Fed's printing press?

[iouris]

Mossad is a branch of the Fed.

[Russian jacket]

USSR thought so too

[opus]

Quote: atalef

3500-3000 $ is no money for a long time, especially for us

You will lie
Iron Dome's Tamir interceptors don't really cost $ 40,000 to $ 50,000 each to manufacture.

3500-3000. USA ... joker. This is the cost of a shot (well, two) BOPS with MBT, essentially a blank
(BPM -2 shot = women's leather winter boots flew away, I still remember the USSR)

$ 1,000 Grad rocket in Iran the retail price of the terrorists in your zone, after "delivery" to the place, reaches $ 10000
AIM-9 Sidewinder: The approximate cost of one rocket, the latest modification is 84000 $.
Early, those d.s., at the start, the price was 43000 $

Quote: atalef

especially for us

well, well 31 780 $ / 12 = 2648 $ per month ... stuffy

[Rumata]

Quote: opus

Iron dome's tamir interceptors don't really cost $ 40,000 to $ 50,000 each to manufacture.

Chukchi is not a reader, Chukchi is a writer!

Quote: opus

well, well 31 780 $ / 12 = 2648 $ per month ... stuffy

Firstly. Now this figure is 38 and 000st, secondly the question arises. This is bad? Two times higher than in the Russian Federation? Probably the 21th place in the world, in terms of total GDP, and not per capita, for a country with 44 million people, this is also terrible.

[opus]

Quote: Rumata

Chukchi is not a reader, Chukchi is a writer!

Yeah, let them read in rafal, the same about 3000. USA, they’ll stop

Quote: Rumata

First of all. Now this figure is 38 000 and 21 place,

# 1 I have a stat for 2014. How did you smirk ("now": 07-2015) to get the results of 2015-xs (as far as I understand / know, these are ANNUAL indicators (and they are ready in 1-2 quarters. NEXT for the "indicative" year
No. 2, in principle, no, but even the Swiss, who in 2014, are the eighth (!), To the phrase

Quote: atalef

no money for a long time, especially for us

, or rather, the speaker will look at such a phrase, they will look at both the insane, well, or at Deripaska (he really does)

Quote: Rumata

Two times higher than in the Russian Federation?

where does the RF and 44 place? SPEECH about what? About the cost of Tamir. where is it produced?
I have never met (well, except for odioses like Chubais, Berezovsky), which 3000 is not money, so a tip

[Professor]

Quote: opus

You will lie
Iron Dome's Tamir interceptors don't really cost $ 40,000 to $ 50,000 each to manufacture.

Raphael officially announced the extreme figures of "several thousand dollars".

Quote: opus

well, well 31 780 $ / 12 = 2648 $ per month ... stuffy

$ 33,400 (2014 est.)
What does this have to do with the cost of a rocket paid by a U.S. taxpayer?

[opus]

Quote: Professor

Raphael officially announced the extreme figures of "several thousand dollars".

Well 50 000 is the same a few thousand dollars.
Sound it. I will be glad.
Well, I didn’t expect you to believe in "Hochma" about 3000 USD for Tamir.
I brought a little value to your fellow countryman

Quote: opus

AIM-9 Sidewinder: The approximate cost of one rocket, the latest modification - $84000.

It turns out the Israelis invented the perpetual motion machine, well, or the Americans of the military-industrial complex are large * t.
/ You poke around, about the Tamir radar station; you find it easier. It costs about 30000, + tripe + well, etc.

Quote: Professor

What does this have to do with the cost of a rocket paid by a U.S. taxpayer?

Why is it American?
Your countryman said

Quote: atalef

no money for a long time, especially for onс

Those. , if I understand correctly for an Israeli citizen (able-bodied, adult) 3000-3500 d.USA, how is 50 p for me?
Right?
That's what I doubted.

[Professor]

Quote: opus

Well 50 000 is the same a few thousand dollars.
Sound it. I will be glad.
Well, I didn’t expect you to believe in "Hochma" about 3000 USD for Tamir.
I brought a little value to your fellow countryman

No. 50 is several tens of thousands of dollars. I will not doubt the honesty of the Raphaelite who voiced the "understated" cost, as usually the price is overstated, especially when a rich American uncle pays for everything. The link was given by "Bumpy".
חיסכון במיליונים: כך הופחתה עלות כיפת ברזל

Quote: opus

It turns out the Israelis invented the perpetual motion machine, well, or the Americans of the military-industrial complex are large * t.
/ You poke around, about the Tamir radar station; you find it easier. It costs about 30000, + tripe + well, etc.

The David Sling missile also costs a million dollars. So what?

Quote: opus

Why is it American?
Your countryman said

So he is right. When an American taxpayer pays for it, it doesn’t matter how much it costs.

Quote: opus

Those. , if I understand correctly for an Israeli citizen (able-bodied, adult) 3000-3500 d.USA, how is 50 p for me?
Right?
That's what I doubted.

No, it's not true. Prices in Israel and Russia are comparable. For the average Israeli, $ 3 is dofig, but for the army it's nothing. This is 000 minutes of F-10 flight.

PS
Regarding the GOS, you were right.

[opus]

Quote: Professor

The link was given by "Bumpy".

In addition to "believe Pimple's link" (and who is that by the way), I have brains, and what kind of experience.
I will give links then
http://mostlymissiledefense.com/2012/12/05/ballistic-missile-defense-iron-dome-d

escription-december-5-2012 /
http://www.businessinsider.com/how-israels-iron-dome-anti-missile-system-works-2

014-7

http://www.defensenews.com/article/20141117/DEFREG/311170010/UAV-Killing-Iron-Do

me-eyed-cheaper-option-patriot

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/talking/88_missiledefense.html
here:
http://s9.invisionfree.com/21c/ar/t2744.htm
can calculate
etc.
The interceptors are typically described as costing about $ 50,000 each, although costs ranging from $ 30,000 to $ 100,000 each have been cited.
(in Hebrew I don’t need to; I don’t understand;

Quote: Professor

So he is right. When the American pays for it

+
damn it did not immediately reach me. Then yeah

Quote: Professor

but for the army it’s nothing. This is 10 minutes of flight F-16.

Well, do not bend.
The army receives a denyuzhku from the budget, the budget is collected by taxes, taxes are paid by a citizen (how much lope do you have 43%?), Incl. a citizen who doesn’t have FIG 10 minutes flies F-16 on a case or 50 minutes cruise for the Minister of Defense’s passion along the coast.
No, well, if the defense army is financed

Quote: Professor

american taxpayer

,then yes. I just don’t take this factor into account

Quote: Professor

Regarding the GOS, you were right.

can you send me? for "digging" ...

(I miss for a full analysis)

Do you know the pictures? Guess with 3x times what is it?

As for the rights: yesterday night I thought for a long time. something wrong.
Radar AGSN Tamira is very small for irradiation, capture with tracking (autonomously) of such a target is small, high-speed (scanning angles, impulse, azimuthal target speed, time, etc.)

What doubts tormented me. Rafael makes a fool (hides Old), most likely combined.
Illumination (at a different frequency) should be provided by the EL / M-2084 radar, those gsn at Tamir "two-component".
But of course there is no IR GOS (it is not needed in this case)

[Professor]

Quote: opus

In addition to "believe Pimple's link" (and who is that by the way), I have brains, and what kind of experience.
I will give links then

Do not believe him, believe his reference.
By the way, in your link the price is very accurate.

First, each Tamir missile costs Israel between US $ 50-90,000,

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/how-israels-iron-dome-anti-missile-system-works-2

014-7 # ixzz3fxODhzS6

Unit costs for the Iron Dome's Tamir missile are classified. But based on interviews at the start of the program, sources estimate a high-end price tag of $ 100,000.
Translate what is written here?

Quote: opus

(in Hebrew I don’t need to; I don’t understand;

Does Google not work?

Quote: opus

can you send me? for "digging" ...

Will customs miss?

Quote: opus

Do you know the pictures? Guess with 3x times what is it?

Iron Dome Battle management Demonstrated

[opus]

Quote: Professor

well, very accurate

Well, in any case, it’s not nonsense about 3000.
if on 3, then you would have stood on every 10 sq.m.
SIMPLY, find out the hail shot, the merkava shot, and forget the "Bumpy links".
Why argue, you (not me) Raphael EASY to answer the request. And you will post it here

Quote: Professor

Translate what is written here?

don’t, we ourselves can.

Quote: Professor

Does Google not work?

he will translate me from Hebrew, then you yourself will laugh.

Quote: Professor

Will customs miss?

ours is easy, even BAYUN will personally give thanks, send, save the state on the SVR

Quote: Professor

Iron Dome Battle management Demonstrated

Well, I'm about the same.
not quite radar

[Professor]

Quote: opus

Well, in any case, it’s not nonsense about 3000.
if on 3, then you would have stood on every 10 sq.m.
SIMPLY, find out the hail shot, the merkava shot, and forget the "Bumpy links".
Why argue, you (not me) Raphael EASY to answer the request. And you will post it here

1. With us they stand on every 10 sq.m, covering the entire territory adjacent to Gaza.
2. A Merkava shot costs about $ 10k. So what? Was there a national project to reduce the cost of a shot of Merkava? For the first time participating in a project for the automotive industry (safety valve for the Volvo fuel system), I was shocked at the cost of the car leaving the factory. And there is a chassis and an engine with a passenger compartment ... Do you know what let's say the cost of Toyota Corolla LE if its price is $ 16k?

3. Asked in Raphael about the cost of Tamir. Here is what they answered.
"It saves money, how much? Two zeros. Instead of hundreds of thousands of dollars, just a few thousand dollars for each missile. And that's the cumulative savings."
http://www.ynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-4358626,00.html

[opus]

Quote: Professor

1. With us they stand on every 10 sq.m, covering the entire territory adjacent to Gaza.

in what area? from the square of Israel. I meant the whole territory

Quote: Professor

Was there a national project to reduce the cost of a shot of Merkava?

nor any national project will give 2 order. There are objective factors in the cost of a product.
Tamir is not a GPS chip that is stamped like pasta in Taiwan and Vietnam (that’s for 10 years from 135 to 1,35).
And the time has not come yet

Quote: Professor

.. Do you know what let's say the cost of Toyota Corolla LE if its price is $ 16k?

-I do not know. You can find out the Toyota sale price by analyzing the ships in the UAE, where they come in packs. The 150 cruiser near 18 turned out
-I know from Mercy the margin in 1996 was 12-17%. Ap receives the main money on spare parts (collect a car for spare parts, you will receive 200-300% of the price) and on licenses for the production of spare parts and on service charges)

Quote: Professor

Here is what they answered.
"It saves money, how much? Two zeros.

so this is a translation of an article from Hebrew.
===========================
Frets cannot be convinced of the illegality of the amount in 3000.
Let so:
I’ll try to find out for myself by more reliable ones.
-Will ship to Americans and Canadians or through regional = here and find out.

[Professor]

Quote: opus

in what area? from the square of Israel. I meant the whole territory

Why cover the whole territory? Who from Jordan will shell the Judean desert? Around Gaza everything is covered.

Quote: opus

nor any national project will give 2a order.

Assemble the prototype manually, put extra duplicate systems on it and calculate its cost. Then carry out optimization, launch into mass production and ... Oh MIRACLE !!!
The price fell by orders of magnitude.

Quote: opus

-I do not know.

Up to $ 10'000. And this is a super complex product consisting of hundreds of thousands of parts requiring complex assembly. Didn't you think about it?

Quote: opus

so this is a translation of an article from Hebrew.

Well, such a language in Israel and in Raphael do not actually speak it. Well, the Russian did not take root ...

Quote: opus

Frets cannot be convinced of the illegality of the amount in 3000.

Why $ 3'000 and not $ 9'999?

[opus]

Quote: Professor

Around Gaza everything is covered.

I mean: "how much noise" in total? From here you will come to the cost of production.
Shells for Merkav produced (produced per month), I suppose there are more orders on 2-3, during the years 30 already?
And they poor fellow remain at the price of 10000. USA

Quote: Professor

The price fell by orders of magnitude.

not convinced.
spend conditionally 1mln $ on development, and buyers need only 10 SAM.
How much should they be sold for? 100'000 $? 200'000 $?

RAD750 - costs 200 thousand $ ... a masterpiece (250 or 150 nm). And why? And not enough. 150 pieces Not tea cartridges

Quote: Professor

Well, such a language in Israel

I'm not talking about that. You gave the answer of "Raphael", the same as in the article.
Well, what does it cost you: write a serious email, a screenshot of the mail. Your answer (you are a citizen, taxpayer) will be answered. You are a screen. That's all.
the exact figure will not be called, but about 3000

Quote: Professor

Didn't think about it?

I have long considered ATC a masterpiece of technology (LCI, safety, consumption, corrosion resistance - all life outside, etc.), Automotive industry is an indicator of the technological development of society.
Only then there is nothing to think about: Toyota Kings produce 300-400 000 units a year? not? year after year.
The accumulated empirical bases, as well as the results of research over 100 years (Toyota is smaller than 60), make it possible to reduce the cost of production. Suppliers (hundreds of thousands) are in line to subscribe to the topic.
That ain't Tamir interceptor

Quote: Professor

Why $ 3'000 and not $ 9'999?

What am I doing?
I'm not a shog, I'm only R:

Quote: atalef

3500$ 3000 - this is no money for a long time

9999 $ / piece is not enough.
In:

Quote: srelock

that the cost of Tamir and in truth may be "several thousand US dollars", only this is the cost of assembling and testing a rocket at the Rafael plant, and accessories for it are delivered from the USA and are included in the assistance program i.e.-are free.

This is a good idea.

[Professor]

Quote: opus

I mean: "how much noise" in total? From here you will come to the cost of production.
Shells for Merkav produced (produced per month), I suppose there are more orders on 2-3, during the years 30 already?
And they poor fellow remain at the price of 10000. USA

I don’t know how many Tamirs riveted, but I know that the shell for Merkava is like a brand new Toyota. Circus.

Quote: opus

not convinced.

But I don’t have to. I cited a statement by a Raphael man in a central Israeli newspaper. no disclosure followed.

Quote: opus

Well, what does it cost you: write a serious email, a screenshot of the mail. Your answer (you are a citizen, taxpayer) will be answered.

Yeah, they’ll answer. By the way, I do not pay taxes to the US budget.

Quote: opus

Toyota kings produce 300-400 000 units per year?

Well? The cost of any striking as the complexity of the product. Tamir did not even lie nearby. How many details are there? What is super complicated and expensive there? Precious metals?

Quote: opus

This is a good idea.

What nafig accessories? Enough of fantasy. I have been covering this topic since 2011. Americans pay and oversee the project.

Quote: opus

9999 $ / piece is not enough.

A Toyota with a hundred thousand parts and a guarantee of mileage from hundreds of thousands of kilometers for the same money?

[opus]

Quote: Professor

no disclosure followed.

and who will ... expose that? you have many such "revelations" about the Israeli defense industry in your memory

Quote: Professor

Yeah, they’ll answer.

why not? Ryenton answered me, well, not always, but answered. Like Boeing

Quote: Professor

By the way, I do not pay taxes to the US budget.

?
I thought you were an Israeli citizen and meant to say about these taxes

Quote: Professor

What is super complicated and expensive there? D

agsn and su, tricky chips processors stand there

Quote: Professor

A Toyota with a hundred thousand parts and a guarantee of mileage from hundreds of thousands of kilometers for the same money?

qty. conveyor

[Professor]

Quote: opus

and who will ... expose that? you have many such "revelations" about the Israeli defense industry in your memory

Oh yeah. It’s a pity you don’t own Hebrew. Here, on criticism of the LCD, some careers have made.

Quote: opus

why not? Ryenton answered me, well, not always, but answered. Like Boeing

And Raphael you ...

Quote: opus

I thought you were an Israeli citizen and meant to say about these taxes

Third time: for LCD palt AMERICA.

Quote: opus

agsn and su, tricky chips processors stand there

Electronics? Ha, so it costs a penny.

Quote: opus

qty. conveyor

Duc and Tamir are stamped day and night. Nasrallah are afraid.

[Rumata]

Quote: opus

escription-december-5-2012 /
http://www.businessinsider.com/how-israels-iron-dome-anti-missile-system-works-2

Many of these links are already three years old or more. In Google there is an option, a filter by publication date, teach to use? How much exactly the rocket costs is no data, but Rafael, a year and a half ago, announced a decrease in cost by 10 times. By the way, on these links, the authors themselves admit that this is speculation, so why on earth are these data correct, but the Pupyrchaty link, for example, is not?

Purchases
125 Tamir (missile) (At unit cost of $ 4 million USD)
$ 600 million USD

[opus]

Quote: Rumata

Many of these links are already three years old or more.

Yes, at least 300 years, on the drum.
I had a direct relationship (and I have a bit) with rocket science, with radar too
So, for your own development, take an interest:
cost of a Grad MLRS shot
-BPS shot
shot of marder
oh yes the most important thing

Quote: opus

AIM-9 Sidewinder: The approximate cost of one rocket, the latest modification is 84000 $.

and about 3000d.USA for Tamir- go laugh the hens (Ukrainian, or Israeli, according to FIG). Chickens have no brains
Tamir AGSN is under 30000d.USA, and you (with a group of comrades) are treating the Russian electorate, about the amount of 3000 d.USA.
Ashamed

[Rumata]

Quote: opus

Chickens have no brains
Tamir AGSN is under 30000d.USA, and you (with a group of comrades) are treating the Russian electorate, about the amount of 3000 d.USA.

Where did I write about 3000? I pointed out that all the links above are useless, that you choose the information that is more suitable for your views, the link is pimpy, but then the article written in 2012 based on Rumors and speculation, which went back to the beginning of development, is suitable.
Ashamed
I don’t really care how much Tamir costs, 3000 or 30, this annoying me is throwing useless links from the top 000 in the search for Google. And yes, stop bragging about your experience in this field, this, like everything else that you write here, faith is just a word. If, for example, I write that I know the one who is involved in improving Tamir and it costs 10, will this end the argument? I doubt it

[opus]

Quote: Rumata

I don’t really care how much Tamir costs,

why then you climb, where didn’t they call? (Jewish solidarity, or what?

Quote: Rumata

I'm annoyed by this casting with useless links from the top 10 in Google search.

relax. it is insignificant.
Esloi you carefully read, someone gave a link to Hebrew some kind of pimply.
I am ABSOLUTELY SAME =

Quote: opus

I will give links then

and that’s it. Not even dripping, but you are already pyzhyat and go for excrement

Quote: Rumata

. And yes, stop bragging about your experience in this field,

I, that every passing "sexual organ" should ask, what should I do and how to do it? and what do I boast about? Do not make me laugh.
I forgot to ask you

Quote: Rumata

If I, for example, write that I know the one who is involved in

yes write, write, disgrace further
over there already wrote nonsense

Quote: atalef

3500-3000 $ - it’s not money for a long time, especially for us

double with.
A vigil, rushed to prove.

[srelock]

Respected opus , I have an idea that the cost of Tamir and in truth may be "several thousand US dollars", only this is the cost of assembling and testing the rocket at the Rafael plant, and the components for it are supplied from the United States and are included in the assistance program, i.e. .-are free.
Otherwise, I can’t explain the lack of the market, for example, MANPADS with ARGSN for ~ $ 2000. And here's another thing, the price tag of civilian security radars, similar in size, weight and functionality to the Tamir radar-tracking radar and using civilian radars starts at ~ $ 40. Consequently, it is very likely (taking into account the above in the posts above) that in Tamira there is PARGSN.

[opus]

Quote: srelock

only this is the cost of assembling and testing a rocket at the Rafael plant,

common sense

Quote: srelock

MANPADS from ARGSN ~ 2000 $

I also don’t succeed in the fact that the Tamirs, at a price in 3000. USA do not stand on every roof of the USA, do not cover the military units of the USA, NATO, do not put them in the air defense of the near warrant, etc.

As for MANPADS (all the same, the interceptor is in 90 kg of weight, it is heavy for MANPADS, and a smaller interceptor (Arrow, Stinge) will have a small field of radar of the GSN antenna (you can’t say anything).

Quote: srelock

that in Tamira is PARGSN.

This is from the logic of the Tamir’s approach to the target (successful interception), the radar of the Tamir’s GSN is too small to confidently accompany such a target as 122 mm RS at a speed of about 800m / s (600-800).
Explicit illumination with radar EL / M-2084

[mpzss]

also wanted to raise the issue of economic efficiency, an UAV costs well, even if it’s up to $ 50, but how much does a shot cost ??? Does it make sense to use heavy artillery against flies?

[atalef]

Quote: mpzss

also wanted to raise the issue of economic efficiency, an UAV costs well, even if it’s up to $ 50, but how much does a shot cost ??? Does it make sense to use heavy artillery against flies?

The question is rhetorical, is it worth investing in helmets, armor - against bullets? To make armored personnel carriers and protected transporters - they shoot at them with cheap bullets

[Dan4eG]

UAV costs well, let it be up to $ 50

well tady and rocket well let it cost $ 52

[Hannibal Lecter]

It seemed to me that the missile did not see the drone. Approximately flew up to him and sideways and she was blown up. Old soviet trick with metal balls inside. They didn’t guess how to cool the mirror at high temperatures, and because of this, the approach of the rocket is so incomprehensible.

[atalef]

Quote: hannibal lecter

It seemed to me that the missile did not see the drone. Approximately flew up to him and sideways and she was blown up. Old soviet trick with metal balls inside. They didn’t guess how to cool the mirror at high temperatures, and because of this, the approach of the rocket is so incomprehensible.

Rocket flew sideways

[Rumata]

Quote: atalef

Rocket flew sideways

As I imagined this picture, a rocket flies up to the UAV sideways. That would be an advertisement for the Israeli military-industrial complex ...

[opus]

Quote: hannibal lecter

that the rocket never saw the drone.

interception takes place like this:

properties of warhead TAMIRA and guidance features
we can say and "flew up sideways", well, like a hole, instead of a hole, some broadcast it, many eat it
Note:
left - good
on the right, unsuccessful (incomplete), the remnants of MV, EXPLOSIVES, fragments and other damaging elements fall to the protected positions

At the same time (left picture) the inversion traces of the rocket are straight and short. If something doesn’t work (the picture is on the right), then the tracks take the form of loops, i.e. Hamas rocket is struck from behind or from the side. Rocket (RS) in this case stray from its direction of flight.

[bender8282]

also a direct hit)))) staging, no other way!

[Rumata]

Quote: bender8282

also a direct hit)))) staging, no other way!

And what is wrong?

[opus]

Quote: bender8282

also a direct hit)))

there was no direct hit.
remote blasting.
Although the UAV, at a speed of 300-400km / h, can fall down and direct, but the radio fuse of Tamir is configured differently. Fan of fragments from warhead - disk, with increasing thickness from the center

[Marconi41]

Be that as it may, the Jewish LCD performs its work and, moreover, is not just military work. The video does not understand much. And the Israelis know how to keep their secrets, I never believe in a leak.

[sergo1914]

Was there a beacon in the target to which the rocket was aimed? We know these "PRO" ... We passed ...

[Rumata]

Quote: sergo1914

Was there a beacon in the target to which the rocket was aimed? We know these "PRO" ... We passed ...

What is wrong with the Israeli missile defense? Where did you go?

[Urri]

Quote: Rumata

What is wrong with the Israeli missile defense?

It does not exist. Unrestrained advertising and aggressive marketing do not count. But the UAV and the militia of Novorosiya knock down. Destruction cost - 2 shotgun cartridges of the 12th caliber and 10 liters of 95th gasoline.

[aleks 62]

..... And the UAV and the militia of Novorosiya knock down ....

..... It depends on which UAV and at what altitude .....

[Corsair]

For the UAV, probably Tunguska-M1 will be the most normal option or something like that, for large and high-flying ones, something is more serious.

[gregor6549]

I do not quite understand the essence of the fierce dispute. The message is generally related to the unintentional (or deliberate for the purpose of public relations) leak of video information from the Iron Dome tests. The tests, I must say, are quite ordinary and nothing special is shown in the "leaked" video. After all, UAVs of the type shown in the video of the Iron Dome case are not the main and much easier targets than MLRS shells and similar NURSs. What I mean is that if the radar and LCD missiles are geared towards detecting and destroying targets such as NURSs, then UAVs with their much higher RCS and much lower speed should not be a problem for LCD and it is not. What is actually shown in the video. And about the cost. Unlike Russian air defense systems, where the effectiveness of the system is determined by the probability of detecting and hitting a certain number of a certain class of targets flying along certain trajectories, in the Israeli air defense system the main criterion is the probability of preventing damage that these targets can inflict if they are intercepted. In this regard, the exchange of several missiles costing tens of thousands of dollars for a human life, which, like that kind of money, is not quite normal. Those. as soon as in Russia people begin to count individually and not statistically, i.e. with the help of the theory of large numbers, so the Russian air defense systems will be no worse than the Israeli ones and we will be proud not because our weapons are the cheapest in the world, but because they are really better than any foreign counterpart can protect their citizens. Not the Moscow elite in the amount of a couple of hundred units (and possibly zeros), but all the citizens of Russia. And this, you see, are two big differences

[neri73-r]

If you consider the protection of the central industrial region, which, of course, includes Moscow, to be the protection of the elite, then ......., my friend, you distort and replace concepts !!!

[gregor6549]

Naturally, I will somewhat exaggerate the meaning of air defense and missile defense of Moscow, but not so much that people who understand me do not understand.
In addition, in Russia there are many industrial, and not only industrial, districts, and Moscow is not at all the most important of them, although central.
But even if it would be the most central, the value of people's lives in other areas and regions from this should not be evaluated on a different, lower scale. And this is the meaning of my post.

[sigdoc]

They want someone to steam their scrap

[Russian jacket]

That’s what you won’t take away from Israel, and what you can learn from is that they do everything for defense ... And they test their products in conditions of war, albeit not quite the same. They learn and know how to open anti-aircraft defense, good infantry and specialists ... They have an interesting experience in the fight against Islamists ... You need to puff out your cheeks, and brvt is the best for your army ...

[prishelec]

And what could be so secret about this? if these systems were shot down by drones, what’s in this super-natural? unclear!))

[Stormtrooper]

Of course, I understand that the safety of the population in Israel is not in last place, but in my opinion the operation of such a system will cost too well. It is enough to estimate the cost of these anti-ballistic missiles and the cost of rockets of the same city or hurricane. High efficiency at moderate cost - all the armies of the world dream about it. This system is clearly not about that.

[Rumata]

Quote: Stormtrooper

Israel is not in last place, but in my opinion the operation of such a system will cost too well. It is enough to estimate the cost of these anti-ballistic missiles and the cost of rockets of the same city or hurricane. High efficiency at moderate cost - all the armies of the world dream about it. This system is clearly not about that.

This has been discussed a hundred times already. It is necessary to compare not with the cost of the rocket, but with what damage it can cause. A missile entering a house means tens of millions of shekels of compensation and possible victims, that is, not a missile worth 5000, knocks down another worth 15, and a missile for 000 prevents millions of damage. The bullet-armored analogy --- soldiers have been cited more than once, in the comments to this article, too ...

[tilix]

That is the joy, the joy of caring for the budget of Israel. And who cares then? The one who must be happy to take care of our budget.
How to stop caring, then the joys will diminish, and so the joys of breeches are full.
But technically, or strategically, not to mention tactically? So each plus, regardless of the score.

[shadow]

And in Israel they also say a lot. For example, that they made the first tank defense complex. That's just why they still can't demonstrate it and it was made in 2005. We demonstrated such a complex called "Arena" back in 1999. The question is, who did it earlier and why Israel has not yet shown this complex of them. I read it on this portal. You can find it here if anyone is interested.

[Rumata]

Quote: Shadows

And in Israel they also say a lot. For example, that they made the first tank defense complex. That's just why they still can't demonstrate it and it was made in 2005. We demonstrated such a complex called "Arena" back in 1999. The question is, who did it earlier and why Israel has not yet shown this complex of them. I read it on this portal. You can find it here if anyone is interested.

What?? Have you fallen from the moon? What is a tank defense complex? 5 seconds on Google gives enough information about Trophy ... When did Israel claim to be the first to create KAZ? Don't you confuse it with DZ? Or with the statement that the Israeli KAZ, the first and only one to be tested in combat?
Before writing nonsense, at least a couple of minutes to read at least VO, arrange yourself an educational program, otherwise people, horses mixed up in a bunch ...

[Professor]

Quote: Shadows

For example, what they made the first tank defense complex.

Is that what they say?

[dakty]

Quote: gregor6549

I do not quite understand the essence of the fierce dispute. The message is generally related to the unintentional (or deliberate for the purpose of public relations) leak of video information from the Iron Dome tests. The tests, I must say, are quite ordinary and nothing special is shown in the "leaked" video. After all, UAVs of the type shown in the video of the Iron Dome case are not the main and much easier targets than MLRS shells and similar NURSs. What I mean is that if the radar and LCD missiles are geared towards detecting and destroying targets such as NURSs, then UAVs with their much higher RCS and much lower speed should not be a problem for LCD and it is not. What is actually shown in the video. And about the cost. Unlike Russian air defense systems, where the effectiveness of the system is determined by the probability of detecting and hitting a certain number of a certain class of targets flying along certain trajectories, in the Israeli air defense system the main criterion is the probability of preventing damage that these targets can inflict if they are intercepted. In this regard, the exchange of several missiles costing tens of thousands of dollars for a human life, which, like that kind of money, is not quite normal. Those. as soon as in Russia people begin to count individually and not statistically, i.e. with the help of the theory of large numbers, so the Russian air defense systems will be no worse than the Israeli ones and we will be proud not because our weapons are the cheapest in the world, but because they are really better than any foreign counterpart can protect their citizens. Not the Moscow elite in the amount of a couple of hundred units (and possibly zeros), but all the citizens of Russia. And this, you see, are two big differences

Maybe you should compare the size of the states !? How much do we need to build, put on duty and provide maintenance of air defense / pro systems to close the entire territory of Russia? I think no one will pull this!

[Rumata]

Quote: dakty

Maybe you should compare the size of the states !? How much do we need to build, put on duty and provide maintenance of air defense / pro systems to close the entire territory of Russia? I think no one will pull this!

89% of the population of the Russian Federation lives in the European part and along the Trans-Siberian Railway. Most of the industry is also located in this area, the rest of the Russian Federation, with the exception of military facilities, does not have such a high strategic importance. Why cover up missile defense throughout Siberia, for example? In the 15 largest cities, more than a quarter of the country's population lives. In terms of the territory that needs to be covered in order to protect 90% of the population and industry of the Russian Federation, it slightly overtakes China, but lags behind the United States, for example ...

[Ascetic]

Quote: Rumata

89% of the population of the Russian Federation lives in the European part and along the Trans-Siberian Railway. Most of the industry is also located in this area, the rest of the Russian Federation, with the exception of military facilities, does not have such a high strategic importance. Why cover up missile defense throughout Siberia, for example? In the 15 largest cities, more than a quarter of the country's population lives. In terms of the territory that needs to be covered in order to protect 90% of the population and industry of the Russian Federation, it slightly overtakes China, but lags behind the United States, for example ..

Incidentally, the A-135 missile defense system of Moscow and the central missile defense system covers 29 subjects of the Russian Federation, or about fifty or more Israel ... In Israel, our missile defense is much - oh - oh stronger ...

[Rumata]

Quote: Ascetic

Incidentally, the A-135 missile defense system of Moscow and the Central Military District covers 29 subjects of the Russian Federation, or about fifty or more Israel ... In Israel, our missile defense is much - oh - oh stronger ...

[Professor]

Quote: Rumata

Incidentally, the A-135 missile defense system of Moscow and the Central Military District covers 29 subjects of the Russian Federation, or about fifty or more Israel ... In Israel, our missile defense is much - oh - oh stronger ...

What? What kind of clever guy proposes to shoot down Grads with 51T6 (A-925) and 53T6 (PRS-1) interceptors? These missiles have a nuclear warhead !!!

[Kaiten]

Quote: Professor

These missiles have a nuclear warhead !!!

Many in Russia hate Moscow so much that Israel did not even stand nearby. So, if in Moscow radiation goes off scale, then in the province they will not cry.

[Kaiten]

Quote: Ascetic

In Israel, our missile defense is much - oh - oh stronger ...

Mathias Rust will confirm.

[sergo1914]

Quote: Rumata

Quote: sergo1914

Was there a beacon in the target to which the rocket was aimed? We know these "PRO" ... We passed ...

What is wrong with the Israeli missile defense? Where did you go?

Not with Israeli. With all the missile defense. Well, except for a fundamentally different Soviet one. Where did you go?

[Professor]

The Iron Dome missile defense system has been successfully tested at sea
On Wednesday, May 18, information about the successful tests of the sea-based Iron Dome missile defense system was allowed for publication. The tests were carried out in February 2016.