Military Review

Chinese analogue of the Russian "Boomerang"

48
In China, an analogue of the Russian armored personnel carrier "Boomerang", developed by NORINCO (China North Industries Corporation), appeared. A prototype of a modular wheeled armored vehicle with the VP10 index has already been shown at one of the exhibitions, reports Rossiyskaya Gazeta with reference to Defense Blog.

Chinese analogue of the Russian "Boomerang"


"The similarity of the Chinese armored personnel carrier with the Russian latest development lies primarily in the layout - the troop compartment of the VP10 is located in the rear part, and the power unit is located in front," the newspaper writes.

It is assumed that the BTR will be equipped with different variants of the combat module. “With a lighter version, the machine will be able to transport 10-12 fully equipped fighters. In the heavy weapons version, the number of troops is reduced by four people, ”the resource notes.

The armored personnel carrier was created with the wheel formula 8х8, it has a mover for overcoming water obstacles and can be transported by air.

According to the resource, the car will be supplied both to the PLA and exported to Latin America and Africa.

According to sources, BTR is currently undergoing a series of tests before the first delivery to an unnamed buyer.

Photos used:
rg.ru
48 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Teberii
    Teberii 13 July 2015 12: 20
    +6
    Show the Chinese, they’ll come up with the rest later.
    1. Grandfather bear
      Grandfather bear 13 July 2015 12: 27
      +11
      China-country 3d printer.
      But, the fact that they "jump quickly" is leveled by the fact that they do not "harness". They think about quality on the go.
      1. CRONOS
        CRONOS 13 July 2015 12: 51
        +11
        Excuse me, but what is the similarity? I did not understand. Or in
        “The similarity of the Chinese armored personnel carrier with the latest Russian development lies primarily in the layout - the landing compartment at the VP10 is located in the aft, and the power unit is located in front”
        ? laughing
        They are not even similar in outline.
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. ispaniard
          ispaniard 13 July 2015 13: 17
          +5
          This is an armored personnel carrier "Piranha" and in my opinion it resembles the armored personnel carrier "Boomerang" much more than the Chinese armored personnel carrier presented in the article ...
          1. GRAY
            GRAY 13 July 2015 14: 16
            +5
            Quote: ispaniard
            This is an armored personnel carrier "Piranha" and in my opinion it resembles the armored personnel carrier "Boomerang" much more than the Chinese armored personnel carrier presented in the article ...

            Yes, they are all alike.
          2. Großer feldherr
            Großer feldherr 13 July 2015 23: 04
            +2
            Quote: ispaniard
            This is an armored personnel carrier "Piranha" and in my opinion it resembles the armored personnel carrier "Boomerang" much more than the Chinese armored personnel carrier presented in the article ...

            This is a French armored personnel carrier VBCI, I will not comment on it far from sin.
      2. veksha50
        veksha50 13 July 2015 13: 55
        +1
        Quote: Grandfather Bear
        They think about quality on the go.



        "On the run", it seems to me, is better suited ...
      3. Sanain
        Sanain 13 July 2015 14: 24
        0
        They just copied the shell, but not the stuffing.

        PS What side, he became an analog? Type due to appearance?
        1. Alf
          Alf 13 July 2015 22: 42
          0
          Quote: sanain
          PS What side, he became an analog? Type due to appearance?

          The number of wheels.
          Until now, there are shots who are firmly convinced that the AK is a copy of the SG-44, and all the confidence of which is that "the Kalash has a crooked store like a German."
          1. Großer feldherr
            Großer feldherr 14 July 2015 20: 27
            0
            Quote: Alf
            Quote: sanain
            PS What side, he became an analog? Type due to appearance?

            The number of wheels.
            Until now, there are shots who are firmly convinced that the AK is a copy of the SG-44, and all the confidence of which is that "the Kalash has a crooked store like a German."

            Not everything is as simple as many would like, for it is not superfluous to recall history as unknown to anyone before and without specials. Education Mikhail Timofeevich Kalashnikov (after a working visit to his design bureau of the most famous gunsmiths of the 3rd Reich, including the creator of the first full-fledged automatic machine on this planet under an intermediate cartridge with gas removal mechanics and locking with a shutter bias) creates the legendary machine ...
    2. Starover_Z
      Starover_Z 13 July 2015 12: 28
      +3
      In China, an analogue of the Russian BTR "Boomerang"

      What ?! Already ?!

      That's for sure:
      Quote: Teberii
      Show the Chinese, they’ll come up with the rest later.
      1. Apologet.Ru
        Apologet.Ru 13 July 2015 12: 42
        +19
        hi
        In China, an analogue of the Russian BTR "Boomerang"

        And why exactly "Boomerang" ???
        "The similarity of the Chinese armored personnel carrier with the Russian latest development lies primarily in the layout - the troop compartment of the VP10 is located in the rear part, and the power unit is located in front," the newspaper writes.

        Why NOT the same "Stryker" ???
        What a stupid thing ...
        What if the tank has a rear engine what
        1. inkass_98
          inkass_98 13 July 2015 13: 48
          +3
          Quote: Apologet.Ru
          Why NOT the same "Stryker" ???

          "Stiriker" - the same "Piranha" in the American way.
          Quote: Apologet.Ru
          What if the tank has a rear engine
          No, this is Renault FT-17 laughing all legs grow from there.
          Damn, srach was formed out of the blue, a zhurnalyuga made a throw-in, and the shirnarmasses were led lol .
        2. goose
          goose 13 July 2015 18: 56
          0
          If the engine at the rear is an analog of Renault FT-17, if in the middle is an analog of MK-V
        3. Bayonet
          Bayonet 14 July 2015 11: 16
          0
          Quote: Apologet.Ru
          What if the tank has a rear engine

          Such a tradition or even a firm conviction - if the Chinese did something, then they copied from us! And since we all thought up everything in this world, it cannot be otherwise! fellow
    3. _Lexa_
      _Lexa_ 13 July 2015 13: 01
      0
      Does he know how to shoot?
      1. APASUS
        APASUS 13 July 2015 13: 28
        +1
        Quote: _Lexa_
        Does he know how to shoot?

        I sometimes suspect that the Chinese primarily want to copy the form itself, because the TTX of the Chinese never coincides with the original. Using the glory of Russian weapons, they push their fakes of sometimes dubious quality
  2. not Russian
    not Russian 13 July 2015 12: 20
    +1
    Something lately too many analogues divorced. I understand that they copy only the best, but nonetheless. Don't you think
    1. kil 31
      kil 31 13 July 2015 12: 28
      +9
      For example, it seems more to me this is more that the press likes to compose. They are not produced in our particular series, but they shout a copy. It’s like cars are like four wheels, two headlights. Well, the Chinese could not find out the layout and characteristics for such a period and produce an analogue.
    2. Vitamin72
      Vitamin72 13 July 2015 12: 50
      -2
      someone is selling our secrets .... am
  3. ramzes1776
    ramzes1776 13 July 2015 12: 20
    +1
    While we will be taking our weapons to the Chinese already 1000 units. rivet and provide all those in need.
    1. Just seraph
      Just seraph 13 July 2015 12: 24
      +2
      Not in quantity, but in quality. The quieter you go, the further you'll get.
    2. ROD VDVshny
      ROD VDVshny 13 July 2015 12: 32
      +6
      Quote: ramzes1776
      While we will be taking our weapons to the Chinese already 1000 units. rivet and provide all those in need.

      I have a Chinese outboard motor. Copy of Japanese Tohatsu 9.8.
      It seems - everything is the same ... it starts up well, but for a long time sad then the air sucks the hose, then the plastic cracked, then the pump burned out .. but everything seems to be the same request
      And that is characteristic - a breakthrough to the people uses them. Swearing and buying ... CHEAP !!! But how many chances to return to the coast on the stroke fellow
  4. Hubun
    Hubun 13 July 2015 12: 21
    +2
    the same picture as the Serbian armature, only the Chinese have more money to compete
  5. Same lech
    Same lech 13 July 2015 12: 21
    +3
    It looks good ... to test it in our 60 degree frosts in YAKUTIA and spring thaw somewhere in the village of GADYUKINO.
    1. Vitamin72
      Vitamin72 13 July 2015 12: 48
      0
      fall apart after 5 km laughing
  6. Just seraph
    Just seraph 13 July 2015 12: 23
    +17
    Ours will be better.
    1. Mikelanjelo
      Mikelanjelo 13 July 2015 12: 44
      +2
      Chinese is like this
    2. Proud.
      Proud. 13 July 2015 14: 29
      +1
      Quote: Just Seraphim
      Ours will be better.

      Damn ... how tall he is.
      1. Sivan
        Sivan 13 July 2015 20: 22
        +1
        Damn ... how tall he is.

        This is inevitable for MRAP, since The V-shaped bottom is required for mine protection.
  7. old pioneer
    old pioneer 13 July 2015 12: 24
    +9
    Analogs like mushrooms multiply. The fashion for armored vehicles apparently went. Oh, those efforts, but in a peaceful direction ... We would already be on Mars.
  8. vladimirw
    vladimirw 13 July 2015 12: 24
    0
    Hike the Chinese copy everything that we buy. Or maybe they don’t buy, but they drag it?
  9. kolkulon
    kolkulon 13 July 2015 12: 35
    +1
    The Chinese, if they do not copy exactly, are not beautiful armored vehicles.
  10. aviator1913
    aviator1913 13 July 2015 12: 36
    +6
    For example, it seems more to me this is more that the press likes to compose. They are not produced in our particular series, but they shout a copy. It’s like cars are like four wheels, two headlights. Well, the Chinese could not find out the layout and characteristics for such a period and produce an analogue.


    I agree. For such a period, it is impossible to make a copy and prepare it for export to any particular country. Development began a long time ago. Ours, too, did not invent a concept from a finger. Half of the world is already riveting similar armored personnel carriers. So to say that this is an ordinary copy-paste of the Russian Boomerang is wrong and stupid.
    Plus, since he is preparing for export, therefore, the release of the series has been adjusted. We have not yet tested it to the end. And about the series it is not clear when and how much will be. Article minus, the fact of copying Boomerang is sucked out of the finger.
  11. Vitamin72
    Vitamin72 13 July 2015 12: 47
    -2
    quickly licked everything ... belay
  12. Wedmak
    Wedmak 13 July 2015 12: 50
    +2
    An analogue, moreover, very remotely resembling a Boomerang - 4 wheels and a slightly similar body.
  13. Tusv
    Tusv 13 July 2015 12: 55
    0
    The wheels are not high-explosive, therefore, another analogue of consumer goods
  14. new communist
    new communist 13 July 2015 13: 07
    0
    A good workhorse for the Chinese, of course there are drawbacks, but given the amount and tactics, a formidable car. In general, the development of armored vehicles in China is growing rapidly and the quality is noticeably increasing. And how can the Chinese army fight, the events in North Korea showed when 300 thousand Chinese soldiers with three-rulers and T-34s piled on to the Amers. Of course, the Chinese have more amer losses, but the main result is for them. And with this technique, stars are hung on anyone.
  15. Dezinto
    Dezinto 13 July 2015 13: 08
    +7
    The Chinese ... hardworking people ... and they have a copy machine in every house)))









    1. WUA 518
      WUA 518 13 July 2015 13: 57
      +6
      There is a saying: If the product does not have the inscription Selano in China, then you have a fake.
  16. Tusv
    Tusv 13 July 2015 13: 19
    0
    Quote: DEZINTO
    The Chinese ... hardworking people ... and they have a copy machine in every house)))

    Nearby is the Chinese representative office, above the radiator are three Frets at once laughing
  17. activator
    activator 13 July 2015 13: 20
    0
    Excuse the people, but I’ll wash everything like bazaar grandfathers just to knock on the clave with their fingers. What kind of analogue does it even look like a boomerang? Chinese, if they want such analogues, can rivet in batches if only someone paid.
  18. sounddoc
    sounddoc 13 July 2015 13: 28
    +6
    Why worry about that - the Eastern brothers know how to creatively recycle everything, for example: Adidas - Abibas, etc.
    Then another misfortune unexpectedly happened: a photo of the latest development of the US military-industrial complex, the Atomic Colt, was published on the network! Obama is in a rage, the Pentagon is in shock, BB called Shoigu! ..
    ..
  19. peter-tank
    peter-tank 13 July 2015 13: 42
    0
    I agree that NORINCO is an awesome 3D weapon printer. I remembered last year’s tank biathlon in Alabino (recently repeated across Russia2). Their Type96 either stalls, or the MSA refuses, or does not go. Changed several times on the track.
    Today I had the good fortune to stare at the PLA equipment that arrived at the intelligence divisions. BRMki based on BMP-1. The combat module looks different from our tower. The gun, most likely, a 30-mm machine gun (was under the cover). But this is garbage.
    The news flashed the topic that the Chinese will bring a new BRM "Brave". It turned out to be a copied Humvee. Although our new friends after the question "Hummer?" frantically waved their hands, pronounced its Chinese name, poked their fingers at the hieroglyphs on the radiator grill - it was a Humvee. As the Chinese translator explained, this is KShM.
    1. kayman4
      kayman4 14 July 2015 06: 34
      0
      they turned out because of a blow when leaving the ditch - it turned out to be a small angle of entry
  20. veksha50
    veksha50 13 July 2015 13: 55
    +1
    "According to the resource, the car will be supplied both to the PLA and for export to the countries of Latin America and Africa" ​​...

    Well, for ourselves we would have copied and produced - we are already familiar with this ...

    However, snatching a piece of bread from under the nose at our Rosoboronexport is no longer just indecent, but bestial ...
  21. Fu fighter
    Fu fighter 13 July 2015 14: 09
    0
    Good too
  22. Strashila
    Strashila 13 July 2015 15: 23
    +1
    Well done ... working out various concepts for the development of technology, but most importantly ... they produce it.
    And practice will show what is good, what is bad.
  23. semuil
    semuil 13 July 2015 18: 18
    0
    And what’s the analogue? Only in the layout? (Still funny). Please give specific data on the reservation, on the electronics. Appearance still does not mean anything.
  24. Peacemaker
    Peacemaker 13 July 2015 18: 20
    0
    I think that the Chinese have temporary quality problems. Look at how the whole world moved to Chinese consumer goods to the detriment of its production. Some Chinese brands are already directly competing with world leaders. HTC Xiaomi and others. So soon their copies, at least, will not be better than the originals, at least with quite solid quality. This applies to the production of armored personnel carriers tanks, aircraft, etc. But there is one problem with them. They can not come up with anything fundamentally new and therefore will copy the best analogues.
    1. sharp-lad
      sharp-lad 13 July 2015 19: 51
      0
      In other matters, like the Japanese! But with what meticulousness the Japanese bring technology to mind ...! hi
    2. sharp-lad
      sharp-lad 13 July 2015 19: 51
      0
      In other matters, like the Japanese! But with what meticulousness the Japanese bring technology to mind ...! hi
  25. akribos
    akribos 13 July 2015 22: 41
    +2
    Stupid article title. Sincerely.