National Interest about the most formidable submarines of Russia

74
During the Cold War, Soviet submarines were an impressive force to be reckoned with. Over the past decade, Russia has made efforts to modernize the armed forces, leading RIA News article published in National Interest.

National Interest about the most formidable submarines of Russia


“By modernizing the models of the Cold War period and designing completely new submarines, Russia clearly intends to update the status and capabilities of its fleet", - said in the article.

The first edition mentioned nuclear submarine "Pike-B" (project 971). “Despite the fact that it cannot work as quietly as its western" colleagues ", this submarine remains a real threat, especially after a series of improvements," the magazine writes, noting also the "improved and" silent "modifications of the boat -" Vepr ", K-152" Nerpa "and K-335" Cheetah "."



The publication was put on the second place by the diesel-electric submarine “Halibus” (project 877), which “are still in service with the Russian Navy, as well as in China, India, Iran and other countries”.



The third in the list was diesel "Varshavyanka" (project 636). “The upgraded model of the 877 boats is much faster than its predecessor,” the author writes. “The Silent Killer is already regarded as one of the quietest diesel-electric submarines.”

Fourth place given the submarine project 955 "Borey". "The lead ship" Yury Dolgoruky, "like the other submarines of this series, is equipped with 16 intercontinental ballistic missiles" Bulava ", in addition to the entire submarine armed with 6 torpedo tubes", informs the magazine and notes that "these boats promise to provide the Russian Military navy long-term technical equipment for the years ahead. "



Well, and concludes the list of submarines of the project 885 (0885) "Ash". “This model is designed to replace the aging fleet, designed in the Soviet years. The first ship of the project, the Severodvinsk, was adopted by the Russian Northern Fleet in 2014. Thanks to the nuclear power plant "Ash" significantly ahead of its predecessors. These submarines can dive to a depth of 600 meters, representing an even more serious threat to their rivals, ”the magazine concludes.
  • ria.ru
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

74 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +14
    12 July 2015 11: 31
    They are afraid of our submariners in NATO. And they’re doing it right. Recognize that even one strategist can do irreparable damage. What can we say about everyone.
    1. +17
      12 July 2015 11: 48
      This last option will be, if that gentlemen ... We are not threatening, just warning!
    2. +26
      12 July 2015 12: 17
      Our guarantor of existence:
      1. +13
        12 July 2015 12: 31
        Quote: Samaritan
        Our guarantor of existence:

        Here is our "guarantor of existence".

        The capable 667-BDRM SSBNs left 4-5 units, and only the TK-941 Dmitry Donskoy used for testing Bulava SLBMs (converted 208 mines) remained from the 2 project boats.
        1. +7
          12 July 2015 14: 57
          and the fact that there are already three boats of the Borey project in service, which by the way is in the photo, you do not take into account?
          1. +4
            12 July 2015 16: 20
            Quote: altman
            and the fact that there are already three boats of the Borey project in service, which by the way is in the photo, you do not take into account?

            The fact that SSBN 955 "Borei" are formally "in the fleet" does not mean that they at the moment ready to carry out the tasks of "nuclear deterrence". This picture was taken in Severodvinsk during sea trials. Immediately after them, the boat was repaired.
            1. +4
              12 July 2015 17: 43
              This photo is four years old, no less .. I don’t think that you are aware of whether they are ready at the moment or not
              1. +1
                13 July 2015 07: 33
                Quote: altman
                I don’t think you know if they are ready at the moment or not.

                Their current condition is no secret request
                Quote from rudolf
                Ash and Borei will be a threat in the future, they have not yet entered the database, they have not entered the BS.

                This information is in many "open sources".
            2. -1
              12 July 2015 18: 40
              Looks good on the background of Pike !!! )))
              1. +6
                12 July 2015 20: 00
                In the background "Shark" project 941, in the foreground "Yuri Dolgoruky"
                1. 0
                  13 July 2015 10: 34
                  Something I confuse them. What is the difference ?
                  1. +1
                    13 July 2015 11: 24
                    So how does Pike differ from Sharks, experts?
                    1. +1
                      13 July 2015 15: 33
                      "Shark" is a huge boat, even a wheelhouse of such a shape that it is impossible to confuse it with anything. "Pike" is not a SSBN, the cabin is "licked"
              2. -1
                12 July 2015 21: 04
                Quote: Izotovp
                Looks good on the background of Pike !!! )))


                Ana sprat even better ...
                1. +1
                  13 July 2015 10: 34
                  And what’s this all about?
              3. 0
                12 July 2015 21: 04
                Quote: Izotovp
                Looks good on the background of Pike !!! )))


                Ana sprat even better ...
            3. +2
              13 July 2015 09: 31
              If the submarine passed sea trials, then it becomes not for repair but for debugging, that is, for the elimination of comments.
        2. +6
          12 July 2015 17: 24
          Quote: Bongo
          Capable SSBN 667-BDRM left 4-5 units

          in the ranks of the 7 BDRM, + 3 BDR at the KTOF (Krasheninikov Bay). wink
          Best regards, hi
          1. +2
            12 July 2015 17: 26
            Quote: old man54
            in the ranks of the 7 BDRM, + 3 BDR at the KTOF (Krasheninikov Bay).
            Best regards,

            It seems that BDRs are going to write off gradually with the introduction of new Boreans. BDRM is now being renovated and modernized.
        3. +4
          12 July 2015 18: 55
          Quote: Bongo
          and from the project 941 boats only TK-208 Dmitry Donskoy remained, used for testing Bulava SLBMs (2 mines were converted).

          Severstal and Arkhangelsk have not yet been cut
          Near the left tower, Dmitry Donskoy is preparing for the exit, and near the right tower whose head is sticking out in the photo (9.07.2015/XNUMX/XNUMX)?
          1. +3
            12 July 2015 20: 05
            On the right is "Arkhangelsk". This can be seen from the emblem on the wheelhouse
            1. +1
              13 July 2015 14: 15
              Quote: altman
              On the right is "Arkhangelsk". This can be seen from the emblem on the wheelhouse

              True, and "Severstal" is in the same place somewhere.
    3. sent-onere
      +30
      12 July 2015 12: 22
      They write with one hand: "Russia is about to fall apart!", With the other: "The Russians tomorrow" will conquer us all!
      such articles are already sick and tired.
    4. +7
      12 July 2015 12: 39
      Money is knocked out in the Capitol. Regards.
    5. +1
      12 July 2015 17: 03
      Quote: oleg-gr
      They are afraid of our submariners in NATO. And they’re doing it right. Recognize that even one strategist can do irreparable damage. What can we say about everyone.

      As for the Shchuka-B submarine, I remember reading somewhere that the Americans themselves admitted that the Shchuka-B is quieter than superior Los Angeles, of which 38 (not all the truth are improved, the original Los Angeles almost all were canceled) from the US Navy, and as for the new submarines, the USA has only 12 Virginia and 3 Sivulfa.
      As for the low noise of Ashen and Boreev, it is likely that only by swimming close to Los Angeles will they be able to detect them with passive means of detection, if at all they can detect them.
      The United States mainly use Los Angeles to monitor the fleets of the countries of the Middle East (Syria, Iran, etc., etc.), and North Korea, and also China, until recently.
      And Virginia and Sivulfa mainly graze Russia.
  2. +7
    12 July 2015 11: 36
    If the west gave its name to our weapons, equipment, then it’s appreciated. Made in Russia - a sign of quality and reliability.
  3. +8
    12 July 2015 11: 42
    Lord! Please give brains to those earning in RIA Novosti. Those who earn money (I can't say that those who work, because for such work you need to immediately drive them in the neck) do not know how to use Google at all. The characteristics of "Nerpa" are described a million times on the net. But RIA Novosti came up with its own version of the characteristics of the submarine. Bravo.

    In the picture with 955 strategists are now incorrectly indicated in the fleet. There are several more boats of project 667BDR and 3 pieces of 941 (even if only 1 of them is experimental, but it is).

    The characteristics of the 877EKM are also taken from the ceiling. Offhand I don’t remember boats with exactly these characteristics built to anyone. Perhaps this is the average characteristics taken averaged among all boats built. The truth is most likely this is the design data. Since looking at all the built ECMs, I did not find a single boat with such performance characteristics.

    As I understand it in RIA Novosti, Google forgot how to use it. Well, or they were banned in Google.
  4. +9
    12 July 2015 11: 44
    Given the fact that most of the planet is water, the fleet as a whole is not just needed, but necessary, and the submarine fleet has our future, and therefore the future of our homeland. So, as luck is in gentlemen, the more the better, I will rephrase a little, we will not surrender, but will build it.
    But you should not underestimate the enemy, so we will not throw hats, but we will follow and follow the adversary in the shadow.
  5. +5
    12 July 2015 11: 44
    Thank you guys for the service! Always respected this profession - a submariner.

    Submarine captain - in mind, in minutes! - solves problems that I would have counted on for two weeks.
    1. +2
      12 July 2015 11: 49
      And a glass of sea water for every 100 meters smile
  6. +5
    12 July 2015 11: 53
    Earlier, from 09.01.2015/XNUMX/XNUMX, there was an extensive article in VO "Comparison of the submarine forces of Russia and the United States." The fact that we are rapidly modernizing and updating our submarine and surface fleets is very good, but NATO is still superior to our fleet in many respects, and this must also be taken into account. To underestimate the enemy is like death.
    http://topwar.ru/66306-.html
  7. +12
    12 July 2015 11: 54
    When the USSR collapsed, we had about 400 of them, with 50 amers, now we have to catch up. Whoever lives next to the berths knows. how the power of the USSR is rotting and rusting. A special "thank you" to Hunchback and Yeltsin.
    1. +4
      12 July 2015 12: 04
      Quote: Barracuda
      A special "thank you" to Hunchback and Yeltsin.

      The characters you listed have certainly done a lot of "good and useful" am But you will be unpleasantly surprised if you look at how many warships, including submarines, were decommissioned from us over the past 15 years. crying
      1. +3
        12 July 2015 12: 22
        Quote: Bongo
        The characters you listed have certainly done a lot of "good and useful" am But you will be unpleasantly surprised if you look at how many warships, including submarines, were decommissioned from us over the past 15 years. crying


        The service life of the submarine is limited. Tired of metal, wear and tear of equipment ... But under Gorbachev there was an open betrayal of the country, when excellent equipment was written off to please America. Yeltsin was already walking along a well-worn track. The reckoning came in Chechnya. "Western friends" invested in Chechnya without moral complexes so that the fire would not go out.
        1. +5
          12 July 2015 12: 42
          Quote: Mayor_Vikhr
          The service life of the submarine is limited. Tired of metal, wear and tear equipment ...

          Certainly! Yes But how did it happen that relatively new ships were decommissioned, while the Navy still retained those that were launched in the 70s? Probably it's not just "fatigue" and "wear and tear"?
          1. +7
            12 July 2015 13: 29
            Quote: Bongo
            Certainly! Yes But how did it happen that relatively new ships were decommissioned, while the Navy still retained those that were launched in the 70s? Probably it's not just "fatigue" and "wear and tear"?


            They wrote off primarily what the West paid good money for writing off. That is, what posed a real threat to the West. I hope this is not necessary to explain?

            When Russia is weakened, it is already possible to openly incite a civil war on its territory, toothless Russia will not snap back anyway. The main thing is that the Russians kill the Russians. And then you can enter the contingent and put things in order. They do it in all countries. They don't even hide anything. Market law - the weak must die. In the meantime, Russia: booze, inject, kill ...
      2. BOLSHEVIK
        +3
        13 July 2015 00: 21
        Quote: Bongo
        But you will be unpleasantly surprised if you look at how many warships, including submarines, were decommissioned from us over the past 15 years.

        Statistics show that the last years 15 were the most destructive for fleets! it is a fact!
        1. +3
          13 July 2015 05: 37
          Quote: Bolshevik
          Statistics show that the last years 15 were the most destructive for fleets! it is a fact!

          For some reason, this fact cannot be recognized by some request The current leadership has also done a lot in this direction, which is only the elimination of naval missile-carrying aviation in 2011. "Fatigue" and "wear and tear" have nothing to do with this.
    2. +1
      12 July 2015 12: 04
      Humpbacked is still alive, even though he is in Germany (he knows ... that he’ll tear his head off here) and he wants to spit in his face. Drunk already in the grave, probably jumping in hell .. How many they ruined, they tormented the people .. Well we don’t get used to, the yoke was, the Poles. the French, etc. ALL WE CAN.
      Quote: Barracuda
      When the USSR collapsed, we had about 400 of them, with 50 amers, now we have to catch up. Whoever lives next to the berths knows. how the power of the USSR is rotting and rusting. A special "thank you" to Hunchback and Yeltsin.
    3. 0
      12 July 2015 17: 38
      Terrible Nick. Beautiful boat. and the cipher standing was assigned .. BARAKUDA. It seems that one in the ranks was now no longer understand or sucks or for cutting ..
  8. +12
    12 July 2015 12: 07
    There are errors in the performance characteristics of boats, but yes figs with it!
    If it’s real, then the Amers have nothing to fear from our submarine forces at sea .... There are almost none
    There are old bdr and bdrm, which, in principle, can shoot back from the pier without going to sea! The multipurpose project of the 971 project is almost everything under repair, and if nothing changes in the repair scheme, then these ships will never go out of repair! It is just not profitable to ship repair nicknames!
    New projects have not been built yet! So, in single copies! Everyone writes about how wonderful they are, these new ash-trees and boreas, but they are silent about the shortcomings, and they are! The most interesting is the same as on previous projects! Plus, the new ones have not yet been practically exploited, that is, the jambs will still climb! By the way, this is a normal phenomenon; modernization should be carried out constantly based on operation data.

    Regarding the repair of ships. Now the repair scheme can be roughly represented as follows:
    1. There is an order for repair.
    2. A repair estimate is prepared in accordance with the repair list.
    3. Allocation of funds for repairs.
    4. Miracles (funds are allocated in full, but ships do not come out of it! The need to allocate additional funds and so on will be justified).

    For normal repair, it is necessary to state paragraph 4 as follows:
    4. The exit of the repaired ship in accordance with the contract or the execution of the management and founders of the shipyard (underline as necessary)!
    1. +1
      12 July 2015 12: 16
      Quote: arane
      There are errors in the performance characteristics of boats, but yes figs with it!

      No, it's not a fig with them. If people are not able to even use Google and find the right performance characteristics, then what is the likelihood that they will not distort the rest? Is it possible to trust RIA Novosti knowing that they are not able not to distort even the performance characteristics of boats? And someone can guarantee that they have not misinterpreted or misinterpreted anything else? Well at TTX I can tell the truth from the lies. But in everything else I can’t. I do not have knowledge on all topics so deep as to know where they lie and where not.
    2. +3
      12 July 2015 21: 58
      Quote: arane
      For normal repair, it is necessary to state paragraph 4 as follows:
      4. The exit of the repaired ship in accordance with the contract or the shooting of the management and founders of the SRZ

      A STOPPICOT OF "PLUSES"! good I agree for 2000%: for all the waste of the perpetrators - to the wall, as well as for failure to fulfill the terms of the contract!
      ..And I don’t think that the number of those shot will be excessive - a dozen will not be required for suggestion. But all the "aunt-uncle-son-in-law-brother" and so on will quickly climb out of responsible positions. wassat
  9. +1
    12 July 2015 12: 12
    Even the fragment of the empire that is now called RUSSIA and that causes fear and horror in the United States and Europe. How they want to destroy it and share all its land and wealth, and free people simply exterminate. But nothing comes out of it and it won’t work out. They themselves will fall to their knees if they try to stick to us. A fear means respect. soldier
  10. The comment was deleted.
    1. +2
      12 July 2015 12: 31
      Boreas alone was armed at the beginning of last year, at the same time he went on duty.
      This year another will be equipped with Maces.
      1. The comment was deleted.
  11. +4
    12 July 2015 12: 23
    Quote: EvgNik
    If the west gave its name to our weapons, equipment, then it’s appreciated. Made in Russia - a sign of quality and reliability.

    He gives his name to all weapons in the world. This is part of their weapon classification and nothing more. It is simply much easier for them to operate in open (and not only in open) literature with names. Without bothering, as we specifically call this or that system. This was especially true in the days of the USSR, when the project numbers were not known for the most part. So, for our boats, they use their own alphabet. By the way, the project 971 boats with the NATO name "Akula" are a "remake". In the same reference book "Jane" these boats, at least in the times of the USSR, were called "SHARK", not "Shark" (although the translation from English is a shark).

    Quote: Barracuda
    With the collapse of the USSR, we had about 400 hundred, with 50 amers

    Yes it was. But do not forget that for the most part these were diesels created in the 50s, some of which were still based on German 2MB projects
  12. +3
    12 July 2015 12: 34
    Let us all live to the point where we could say
    "Well .... (insert who wants what Obama, America, Clinton ... well, etc.) helped you
    anti-Russian sanctions! "
    1. sent-onere
      +1
      12 July 2015 12: 38
      Quote: staryivoin
      Let us all live to the point where we could say
      "Well .... (insert who wants what Obama, America, Clinton ... well, etc.) helped you
      anti-Russian sanctions! "



      We will not live ........ grandchildren will probably survive.
  13. +2
    12 July 2015 14: 17
    Let the adversaries know that at any moment on the Hudson can see a re-inspection of the Russian submarine cruiser!
    1. +4
      12 July 2015 14: 40
      Ga Hudson? Hardly what they lost there? But in the area of ​​Norfolk, or Charleston (the main base of the US Navy on the Atlantic coast), it is very likely.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  14. +2
    12 July 2015 15: 29
    I read and understand that they do not know anything about our boats.
  15. 0
    12 July 2015 15: 33
    The asps "vibrated" ...
  16. +2
    12 July 2015 17: 15
    Quote: Bongo
    Here is our "guarantor of existence".

    it was necessary to find something newer, not the decommissioned "Poplar" wink

    Quote: altman
    and the fact that there are already three boats of the Borey project in service, which by the way is in the photo, you do not take into account?

    With ammunition and in the fleet, only one. The second will receive the BC this year (16 of the 40 missiles that Putin spoke about)

    Quote: Bongo
    Capable SSBN 667-BDRM left 4-5 units

    In fact, they are all capable. Just one of 6 is in scheduled maintenance.
    1. +2
      12 July 2015 18: 57
      it was necessary to find something newer, and not write off "Poplar" wink

      alas honestly and really
    2. +2
      13 July 2015 05: 44
      Quote: Old26
      it was necessary to find something newer, not the decommissioned "Poplar"

      Is it not Topol that still constitute the basis of our strategic nuclear forces? what
      Quote: Old26
      With ammunition and in the fleet only one.

      But "combat patrol" he did not go out yet request
      Quote: Old26
      In fact, they are all capable. Just one of 6 is in scheduled maintenance.

      It happens that not one of the 6. And while in "scheduled repair" can they use missiles?
  17. 0
    12 July 2015 17: 28
    With nuclear deterrence, everything will be all right, the triad will be updated, it seems, completely and soon, which cannot but reassure)
  18. 0
    12 July 2015 18: 39
    Recently I read a little bit of the topic such information regarding the noise data of Project 667 BDRM submarines (Wikipedia article) quote:

    "The noise level of submarines of Project 667BDRM" Dolphin "at a speed of 4-8 knots in the frequency range 5-1000 Hz is 65-85 dB per 1 Pa at a distance of 1 m. [25]

    While patrolling in the Barents Sea, the 667BDRM nuclear submarine is detected by a Los Angeles-class submarine at a distance of up to 30 km (with complete calm (8% of the time of the year)), under normal conditions (92% of the time of the year) AN / BQQ-5 station detects the Dolphin nuclear submarine "At ranges no more than 10 km [26]"
    Who has a technical education, which means 65-85 dB per 1 Pa at a distance of 1 m? Does this mean that at a distance of 1 meter the noise is 65-85 dB?
    1. +2
      12 July 2015 19: 19
      The scatter in 65-85 is alarming. this means 10 ^ 2 - 100 times the minimum. At a distance of 1m, these numbers represent - laughter. Goodbye.
      1. 0
        12 July 2015 21: 29
        Quote: Igor Nikonov
        The scatter in 65-85 is alarming. this means 10 ^ 2 - 100 times the minimum. At a distance of 1m, these numbers represent - laughter. Goodbye.

        Clearly, there is simply a lot of speculation on the subject of submarine noise, I understand that this is state. secret, but the data on the old submarines of the 50s and 60s of their construction is something to hide. Would publish data on the SAC of the submarines of that period of their power, as well as the noise of the submarines. So that you can at least roughly estimate how quiet modern submarines are.
        For example, data on the range of aircraft radars and ground-based air defense systems is publicly available. As well as the EPR of the most modern Russian T-50 PAKFA aircraft, the figure 0,3-0,4 square meters EPR was directly openly called.
        And they are silent with the submarines as partisans. Well, ours, but the data on the U.S. submarines is something to hide, ours probably have long known the noise and parameters of the Ohio and Los Angeles HAC?
  19. +3
    12 July 2015 18: 43
    Quote: Dima Čalevo
    With nuclear deterrence, everything will be all right, the triad will be updated, it seems, completely and soon, which cannot but reassure)

    What is being updated and will be updated - there is no doubt about it and cannot be. As for the full and soon - here, alas, not everything is so violet.
    Take, for example, the Strategic Missile Forces. Purchases are underway, but the weapons program will stretch for several years, at least 5, or even 10. Do not forget that we put 1-2 regiments on the database every year. And the divisions that will rearm - alas, not one. And the Topol is being decommissioned - new missiles must also be installed instead.
    It's the same with the navy. The second Borei will become operational this year. The third is next. There are several more buildings ahead ...
    One way or another, bombers must undergo modernization, at least for engines. So fast, alas, it doesn’t work out
  20. +1
    12 July 2015 18: 43
    And soon, air-independent diesel engines will appear and become even more interesting, especially in the Black Sea)))
  21. +2
    12 July 2015 18: 47
    Quote: Izotovp
    And soon, air-independent diesel engines will appear and become even more interesting, especially in the Black Sea)))

    Not earlier than 2020, at least. Despite the fact that for a long time they will use the head one, or maybe they will first do an experimental one. That is, in reality, such boats we will not have in the series before 2025-2030
    1. 0
      12 July 2015 20: 59
      This is understandable, but how then will our most likely friends in the Mediterranean get worried when diesels with an autonomy comparable to the atomic one appear)))
  22. +1
    12 July 2015 21: 04
    Quote: Izotovp
    This is understandable, but how then will our most likely friends in the Mediterranean get worried when diesels with an autonomy comparable to the atomic one appear)))

    So they will not sit idle.
  23. 0
    12 July 2015 21: 34
    Unfortunately, in this matter we are catching up with ((((. Yuppie won’t generally plan to make a fully rechargeable boat.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  24. +1
    12 July 2015 21: 46
    Quote: Lt. air force reserve
    Would publish data on the SAC of submarines of that period of their power, as well as the noise of submarines. So that you can at least roughly estimate how quiet modern submarines are.

    We will estimate, but also "they are" also. Moreover, the source materials they will have much more. Why simplify the life of enemy intelligence?
  25. jjj
    +1
    12 July 2015 22: 16
    Friends! Reading the comments, you can see the diversity of our society's ideas about the submarine fleet. You can see that the myths launched in due time continue to walk and even acquire new "specifics". And thank God! And how really? In fact, it is normal. Difficult but ok
  26. 0
    13 July 2015 04: 39
    but I like that kind of power and nothing more ... hi
  27. +1
    13 July 2015 08: 15
    Quote: zyablik.olga
    Is it not Topol that still constitute the basis of our strategic nuclear forces?

    Not. As of January 2015, they amounted to less than one quarter of all ICBMs of the Strategic Missile Forces, more precisely 23,6%. In numbers, these are 72 complexes of 305 (4 regiments in one and two regiments in two divisions in two divisions)

    Quote: zyablik.olga
    But "combat patrol" he did not go out yet

    On military service (BS) - yes, it seems, did not go out. On alert (DB) "at the wall" - for sure is. The question was somewhat different: why are we not taking into account 3 "Borea". Due to the fact that 2 is still without ammunition

    Quote: zyablik.olga
    It happens that not one of the 6. And while in "scheduled repair" can they use missiles?

    It happens. But usually no more than two. Currently under scheduled maintenance "Tula". The rest 5 - "Bryansk", "Verkhoturye", "Yekaterinburg", "Karelia", "Novomoskovsk" - in the ranks. At the Pacific Fleet, only 2 boats of project 667BDR are in service - "Podolsk" и "Saint George the Victorious". Third - Ryazan - under repair

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"