Lawyers questioned the legitimacy of the US Declaration of Independence

17
Lawyers questioned the legitimacy of the US Declaration of Independence

American and British lawyers are arguing about the legality of the Declaration of Independence of the United States, adopted on July 4, 1776 by members of the Second Continental Congress, who were unhappy with the royal authority. The debate took place in the state of Philadelphia, where it was signed historical document of sovereignty. The British claim that the Declaration of Independence, created by Thomas Jefferson, is illegitimate, it was "a blow to universal freedom, a call to war and the cornerstone for the foundation of a new empire," writes the BBC.

The discussion, designed to find out whether the American colonists really had legal grounds for declaring independence, was organized by the American Bar Corporation and the Greev School - one of four English barrister schools.


For American lawyers, the answer to this question is quite simple, it is consonant with the Russian proverb "they have found a straw in another's eye, but they do not notice it in their log." The Americans reminded the British that they also "used the Declaration of Rights to overthrow King James II, and all these acts were considered fully justified and legal."

The British, however, do not consider “separation” a legal instrument through which internal disputes can be settled. “What will happen if Texas suddenly decides to secede from the United States?”, British lawyers asked.

Americans fended off: in 1770's, the moment came when people whose “natural rights” were violated, no longer wanted to be loyal to “tyranny”.

But the complaints listed in the Declaration of Independence were too trivial to justify a split, barristers from England said. The main one - no taxation without representation - no more than the desire of the colonists not to pay for their protection from the attack of France, which the British military carried out for seven years.

Lawyers from the United States brought their counter-argument: the legitimacy of the Declaration is confirmed by the fact that some of its points are reflected in the Charter of the United Nations.

Voting at the end of the discussion showed that the majority of participants in the discussion recognize the legitimacy of the Declaration.

Fight for freedom

In 1607, the first English colony of Virginia (virgin, eng. - “virgin”) appeared in North America, named after the “virgin queen” Elizabeth I. Over the course of 75 years, 12 colonies emerged - New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rod Island, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina and Georgia.

From the middle of the 17th century, Great Britain tried to establish complete control over the economic operations of the American colonies, implementing a scheme in which all industrial goods (from metal buttons to fishing vessels) were imported into colonies from the metropolis in exchange for raw materials and agricultural goods. Under this scheme, English entrepreneurs, like the British government, were extremely disinterested in the development of industry in the colonies, as well as in the trade of the colonies with anyone other than the metropolis.


Meanwhile, the American industry has achieved significant success. Especially American industrialists succeeded in building ships, which allowed them to quickly establish trade with the West Indies and thereby find a market for domestic manufactory. The English Parliament considered these successes so threatening that in 1750 he passed a law prohibiting the construction of rolling mills and iron-cutting workshops in the colonies. The foreign trade of the colonies was also harassed.

By the second half of the 18th century, the population of the American colonies became more and more distinct as a community of people who were in confrontation with the metropolis. Oil was added to the fire by the Stamp Duty Act, which hit hard on American publishers. American industrialists and merchants, who were extremely dissatisfied with the colonial policy of the metropolis, also showed discontent. The presence of British troops (remaining there after a seven-year war) on the territory of the colonies also caused discontent among the colonists. Increasingly, there were demands for independence.

Feeling the seriousness of the situation, both the UK and the American bourgeoisie, were looking for a solution that would satisfy the interests of both the metropolis and the colonies. So in 1754, on the initiative of Benjamin Franklin, a project was launched to create a union of North American colonies with its own government, but led by the president appointed by the British king. Although the project did not provide for the complete independence of the colonies, it caused an extremely negative reaction from the British government. All this became the prerequisites of the War of Independence of the United States.

Shortly after the outbreak of the war in the first days of June 1775, prominent lawyer Thomas Jefferson was elected to the Second Continental Congress, who met in Philadelphia. When Congress in June 1776 considered a resolution declaring independence, it was decided to create a committee to prepare the accompanying declaration. Jefferson was elected as its head, in addition to him, the committee included four more people: John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Roger Sherman and Robert Livingston.

At one of the committee meetings, the other members unanimously asked Jefferson to write the initial version of the declaration himself, since Jefferson was well known as a writer. In consultation with the rest of the committee, Jefferson wrote the first version of the declaration, using as a model, in particular, the Virginia Human Rights Declaration, written by George Mason.

After making some changes, the draft was submitted to the 28 Congress on June 1776 of the year. July 2 Congress, after voting for independence, began to consider the Declaration. After a two-day debate, almost a quarter of the text was removed from the Declaration, including a criticism of slavery and the slave trade, which outraged Jefferson, who opposed slavery, despite the fact that he himself used slave labor on his plantations. However, the resulting version was approved by the 4 Congress on July 1776 of the year. July 4 is now the main US holiday, Independence Day, and the preamble of the Declaration, which brought the most prominence to Jefferson, is the most famous text on human rights.
17 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. sirToad
    +4
    22 October 2011 13: 03
    But what other topic was not found? and what if to prove that the declaration is not a document but a piece of paper - so what? states, as in one of the futurama series, will turn into a British colony? although ... my cat is also bored. he immediately finds the case
    1. NUT
      NUT
      +2
      22 October 2011 15: 55
      no, bro, the states of the company and the company with which we don’t drink, do not disdain to rummage in our shit and have not a bad exhaust from that in our brains (after all, we still fight like fish on ice, although clear water is nearby)
      so why not pick their shit? if they are better, then there’s a lot more and stink more
      the main thing is not to make a mistake with the wind direction
  2. 0
    22 October 2011 15: 51
    Well! Lovely curses - only amuse themselves! It’s nice to see the Saxons emphasize their importance. "There we are! We don’t look in the ass of the states, as many believe, but we CAN press them ourselves! Yes, not somehow, but somehow! Yes, we are like that ...!" Sir, you, as always, are right, having prescribed a "recipe" for NAGLosax! angry fellow
  3. 0
    22 October 2011 15: 55
    No matter who and what proves. In my opinion, Britain has long been a colony (undercover) of the United States.
    1. sirToad
      0
      22 October 2011 16: 00
      or maybe, just, the merchant’s house with the cartiers moved to other mansions?
      I mean, the shop is all the same one!
  4. lightforcer
    0
    22 October 2011 19: 10
    Immediately remembered the claim of the Egyptians to the Jews. It turns out that the cunning Moses not only brought his people out, but also greatly facilitated the treasury and wallets of citizens, that is.
  5. mitrich
    +7
    22 October 2011 20: 28
    Arguing with a lawyer is like pouring mud on a pig: after a while you realize that the pig REALLY enjoys wink !
    1. sirToad
      0
      24 October 2011 04: 53
      and why do you not like the current lawyers? it is of course one of the oldest professions and, by changing vectors, it can be pulled by two other, no less ancient professions — journalism, you know what.
      1. 0
        24 October 2011 06: 24
        looking at their antics you come to the conclusion that this is one, we ourselves know what profession
        1. sirToad
          0
          24 October 2011 06: 29
          here everyone does not like themselves, you know, what to use, use!)))
          1. 0
            24 October 2011 06: 55
            not, you know, of all I don’t like least of all, they are more decent of all
            though they don’t scream that the most honest
            1. sirToad
              0
              24 October 2011 07: 03
              yes! girls have a different excuse, usually unhappy love. while my colleagues are fighting for non-existent justice. and so, in general, - a favorite expression - "nothing personal, just business" when he studied at our law school, the teacher of civil law cited as an example the words of one amersky, it seems, a lawyer - "pay more and I'm ready to sue myself"
  6. Tyumen
    +6
    22 October 2011 20: 28
    I was present in the courtyard of the Congress when the Declaration of Independence was read there. Of decent people, there was almost no one there.
    Charles Biddle
  7. +6
    22 October 2011 20: 50
    which particularly revolted Jefferson, who was an opponent of slavery, despite the fact that he himself used slave labor on his plantations.
    it especially characterizes Western civilization
  8. +3
    22 October 2011 21: 33
    Let everyone in this dispute find what suits him, and picking them will not hurt. All the same, no one will win back. But reproaches and jokes - let them have fun. We are neither cold nor hot from this.
    1. +1
      22 October 2011 23: 17
      Funny people ... Any branches and independence have a shade (sometimes in the form of a 100% color :)) illegality. Then it was still necessary to move (although, despite all the movements, the British partly blew up the guerrilla war). So now this debate is purely theoretical (it reminds me of a scientific debate on the topic: from which end you need to break the eggs). They would still grapple in the war of independence (and what, weakly to return their colonies to England?).
      :)))
      1. 0
        23 October 2011 21: 34
        Quote: Uhalus
        Any branches and independence are tinted (sometimes in the form of 100% color :)) illegality.

        their famous color is brown, all of this with independence in order to steal on the spot, sharing with the mother country
        and screaming all that something about "liberty"