Results of the week. “Yes, yes, hot and fair whites!”
News for Chisinau
After a number of “democratic” decisions taken by Ukraine, the blockade of Transnistria, sandwiched between Ukraine and Moldova, is being actively discussed. The discussion of this issue is heating up due to the fact that there are about 180 thousands of Russian citizens living in the Pridnestrovskaia Moldavskaia Respublika, a Russian peacekeeping contingent of about 1,4 thousand people resides, and the well-known provocateur Mr. Saakashvili, noted in the Ukrainian region adjacent to the TMR, Napoleonic "action in 2008 year.
Transnistrians did not shed crocodile tears, did not turn to international bodies for truth - they wouldn’t hear it anyway. It’s just that Foreign Minister Nina Shtanski took and wrote a letter to Chisinau, in which she clearly stated the Transnistrian position. And let Chisinau understand the letter as an ultimatum, but this is his own problems.
There will be a blockade of the PMR, which means there will be an answer: visa regime with Moldova, 100% protective duties, nationalization of Moldovan business and other “charms”. Something like this…
Comments from our readers:
Vasilina67
Alexander 3
aszzz888
Confession
The General Prosecutor’s Office of Russia received a request from a group of deputies of the State Duma of the Russian Federation regarding the legality of the exit of the Baltic republics from the USSR and the declaration of their independence. The request came after the Prosecutor General’s Office announced the anti-constitutional decision of 1954 on the transfer of the Crimean Peninsula to the Ukrainian SSR.
Of stories: the decision to recognize the independence of the Estonian, Latvian and Lithuanian SSR was taken by the USSR State Council.
Accepted, sorry what? And what exactly is this State Council? This is a body that is unconstitutional as well as the very recognition of independence by the Baltic "sisters". But how happy are you - we are independent, recognized by all, and therefore we have the right to give a voice, growling towards Russia with Baltic toy terriers ... Are you still growling? Then ... we will take, and we will revoke the recognition as the successor of the USSR ... Walk for a start in the "partially recognized", so that the arrogance is lost ... And the Swedes can already buy back the partially recognized ...
Comments from our readers:
Egoza
SHILO
D-Master
Knn54
Gas and liver
June 30 expired Russian discount on gas for Ukraine. By itself, the fact of having a Russian discount for Ukraine is already causing some kind of strange feeling - as if it is advancing into a bunch of excrement. But it is only because of the constant cries from the Ukrainian “friends”: “Russia is an invader aggressor! The aggression is more aggressive and more aggressive, ”plus the euro-pushing from under the American stick in the style of“ We need to resist Russian aggression ”already look like a deliberate parrot.
The Russian government has decided this time to offer a discount to the “fraternal” government of Ukraine, but in somewhat smaller volumes. The total gas price is 247,18 dollars per thousand cubic meters. Ukrainian, “friends-partners-partners”, you know, did not arrange such a price, they demanded to throw off “at least” to 227 bucks, but Moscow stayed with its 247,18: take it, want it or not. And Kiev, moving eyebrows, said: we will not take! .. Let's start, they say, again to negotiate the reverse and "tyringse", and in September - as it gets colder, and when the "tyring" ceases to be enough - let's meet and talk. In general, they included the fifth speed of "Square" ...
The inspiration to the Ukrainian side added the decision of the United States to open duty-free access for a number of Ukrainian goods before the end of 2017. The list of goods makes the Kiev authorities and citizens want to tighten the “Has not yet died ...” On the list for duty-free export, native Ukrainian products: meat of seals, walruses, dolphins, whales and sea lions, ostriches Emu, monkeys and monkey offal. Cruel trolling from the US Chamber of Commerce! It remains to be seen whether the internal organs of representatives of punitive battalions fall under the “duty-free” article? ..
Comments from our readers:
Alvog
SPB 1221
Reserve buildbat
The onizhedety switch is not a toy!
Since 00 hours 1 July Ukraine decided to disconnect the Crimea from electricity. This is another attempt to bring the situation on the Russian peninsula, which, by the way, is home to a lot of Ukrainian citizens, to panic. No panic happened ...
Realizing that the declaration of readiness to de-energize Crimea did not cause panic among the Crimeans and guests of the peninsula, they suddenly stated in Kiev that they did not intend to turn off anyone, and that statements about the power cut off were provocative journalists. Representatives of Ukrenergo confirmed the information that they did not start any energy war with the Crimea, and did not intend to undertake a venture.
Apparently, Kiev is testing the ground for what can happen in the Crimea if you really pull the switch, and how will Moscow behave? But Kiev may well have a seizure in which the hand of the main adherents of the Square will be pulled to the cherished button. Are you ready for this in Russia? Does Moscow have a pill that can help ukrovlasts in time with an attack to cope? Otherwise, otherwise the Russian Crimea will continue to depend on the degree of mental illness of the Kiev “managers”.
Comments from our readers:
Nicholas S
Vsoltan
Mr.vasilievich
Grantosos
The Consumer Rights Protection Society, the head of which issued a “reminder” on the website of the society that Russians need to get permits from the Ukrainian authorities before going to Crimea, has again shown itself. This time, OZPP representatives are going to appeal to the Constitutional Court of Russia about the law on the entry of Crimea and Sevastopol into the Russian Federation.
Apparently, the amount of the grant this time isSTDs OZPP is such that its members need to climb out of their skin in order to work out the grant. Otherwise, why is it that a non-profit organization of a “foreign agent” disassembles so out of the blue? Or did someone from his leadership in the Crimea also have his own “candle factory” under Ukrainian jurisdiction, which successfully nationalized? Where does your activity come from? - Tell us the truth, gentlemen defenders.
Comments from our readers:
Major71
Ispaniard
Imperialkolorad
Greenpeace Silence
In the so-called exclusion zone in the region of the Chernobyl nuclear power plant (Ukraine), once again in the last few weeks, great fires have broken out. The fires in the zone of radioactive contamination led to the release of radioactive elements into the atmosphere, which are spread by gusts of wind over impressive distances. The Ukrainian capital was again under the radioactive threat. The fires near Chernobyl rage with terrible force, and for some reason, the official representation of the world famous environmentalists Greenpeace in Ukraine is silent.
And why is Greenpeace straining? First, land troops in the area of burning Chernobyl forests and hang eco-posters on the Chernobyl sarcophagus - look for fools, and Greenpeace is not fools at all ... Second, Ukraine is not at all the state where Greenpeace is going to waste the money of its weighty fund. Here are plastic bottles in Yauza, a Russian drilling rig in the Arctic, forest fires in the Bryansk region, yes, and Chernobyl ... Well, what is Chernobyl? Just think - radiation ... It's not Greenpeace's thing to understand the gamma decay at a loss ...
Comments from our readers:
Serge Mikhas
KOSTIA
Nomad
Will the city sleep peacefully in maples and acacias? Demilitarization?..
Deputy Chairman of the Parliament of the Donetsk People's Republic Denis Pushilin said that the leadership of the DPR unilaterally declared Shirokino a demilitarized zone. At this step, according to Pushilin, Donetsk went as a gesture of goodwill.
Information about the exit of the militia fighters from Shyrokyne was confirmed. Representatives of the OSCE mission went to Shirokino, who have already stated that after a complete cease-fire in the area of the settlement they are ready to deploy a permanent mission of a special monitoring mission here. For those who believed that the shelling in Shirokino was provoked precisely by the forces of the DPR militia, it should be interesting that even after the withdrawal of units of the army of the Donetsk People’s Republic, facts of a cease-fire violation were recorded. So, it remains - nothing at all ... To make Shirokino a completely demilitarized zone, Kiev needs some rolls (the Nuland rolls are not offered ...) to lure out the Azov fighters from there. Utter nonsense ...
Comments from our readers:
Ingvar 72
Boozer
Lyapis
Peace, friendship, chewing gum
Brazil and the United States announced the signing of documents relating to the cooperation of the two states in the field of defense (“umbrella agreements”). Negotiations between Dilma Rousseff and Barack Obama were held at the White House on June 30.
Recall that in 2013, Rousseff canceled the planned visit to the United States because information appeared in the media about wiretapping of her telephone conversations and viewing correspondence. At the current meeting in the White House, the presidents did not even mention the espionage scandal. In addition, Obama, who not so long ago with disdain spoke of Russia as a "regional power", noted that Brazil is a "global power". Probably, these words were a response to Dilma Rousseff’s recent statement about her trust in Washington. She also said that she did not think that the United States was watching her. According to analysts, Rousseff went to a new rapprochement with the United States for the sake of maintaining the Brazilian economy, which has been going through hard times: the country is experiencing an aggravation of the financial situation and budget deficit. In 2015, the economy is expected to fall by 1,3%.
Thus, Dilme Rousseff has nowhere to go, and she returns to the economic partnership (including in the military field) with the United States. The economic downturn dictates the appropriate policies. Past "offenses" are forgotten, from now on, Brazil "trusts" the United States and does not believe that Washington is tapping. In response to such courtesy, polite Obama calls Brazil a “global power.”
The last is clear: as soon as any state strengthens relations with the United States, it immediately raises its prestige. True, only formally. Russia also entered not so long ago in G8 and was considered an almost democratic developed country, but after deteriorating relations with the United States, Obama called it a “regional power”, and with a “torn economy”. And now Brazil, despite the recession and the crisis, one day almost broke into the world hegemons ...
Comments from our readers:
vsoltan
Talgat
Grbear
Martin Dempsey blesses America to fight revisionism
There is a press release on the Pentagon website about the new US national military strategy. The adopted strategy, in the development of which the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the United States, Martin Dempsey, participated, envisages Washington’s struggle with “revisionist states”. The list of enemies includes Russia and the Islamic State.
According to the adopted document, the American army should be ready to fight “revisionist states”, such as Russia, because they violate international norms.
And what about Russia?
Recall, recently, Russian President Vladimir Putin said that Russia has no intention to threaten any countries. “We have not and cannot have aggressive plans. We do not threaten anyone, and we strive to resolve any disputable issues solely by political means, respecting international law and the interests of other countries, ”Putin’s words to Interfax were given at a reception in honor of graduates of higher military educational institutions. The President added that "Russia is an open country to the world, which is in favor of strengthening cooperation and partnership with all who are ready for this."
Let us ask ourselves: are we ready for the US partnership? Or their so-called allies, who, against their will, impose sanctions against Russia? Is Washington generally seeking partnership? No, that never happened. The United States has always gone to profit, to drain other people's resources, to impose its “interests” and finally to dominate the planet. The political ideal of the West is simple: every state for each step must seek permission from the Washington hegemon. Those who disobeyed, he becomes a threat to American "national security", is accused of "disrespect for the sovereignty of their neighbors", of "revisionism" and is recorded as violators of the "world order".
Comments from our readers:
RuslanNN
Shick
Shiva83483
VadimSt
Rules of conduct in the sky
When meeting with the Swedish Air Force aircraft, Russian military aircraft often undertake dangerous maneuvers, said the commander-in-chief of the Swedish armed forces, Sverker Joranson, during a seminar on the island of Gotland.
“Russian aircraft violate generally accepted rules of conduct. In particular, they are approaching dangerously close distances to Swedish aircraft, and in some cases even release false heat targets, ”Joranson said. The general is sure that such provocative actions of pilots "must have been approved at the highest level, otherwise they would not have behaved like that."
A little bit more, and the general would have started talking about the rush hour and about traffic jams in the sky - that the Swedish planes have to wait at idle, when all these impolite Russians, who cut the Swedes and even taxi to the opposite side, will fly by. As for the assumption of Joranson on the authorization of “defiant actions” from above, everything is simple. Before taking off from Red Square, the pilot of each Russian aircraft passes personal instruction from Comrade Putin, who reminds the pilot of actions in the event of a heavenly meeting with the Swedes.
Comments from our readers:
Telakh
Vladimirets
domokl
bif
Found a braid on the stone
Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras said that his people should answer the demands made by international lenders (ECB, IMF and European Commission) during the referendum. We are talking about the decision on the further implementation of the "reforms" or the rejection of them without external blackmail. According to Tsipras, the referendum could pass 5 July. If the Greeks favor the continuation of “tightening the belts,” then Tsipras will have to obey the will of the people and accept the next aid package in the amount of 7,2 billion euros from Brussels. If the Greeks say no, then the EU will either have to refuse financial assistance to Athens and put the very existence of the eurozone in its present borders into question, or swallow an insult and give Greece a tranche. Tsipras himself asks voters to say no to the EU’s proposals for further cost reductions in exchange for external funding.
Tsipras is a simple political bargaining. He tells the voters that the answer “no”, leading to the refusal to accept the EU proposal, will give Greece the opportunity to knock out the best conditions at the negotiations.
On the other hand, the support program for Greece expired on Tuesday this week, and lenders refused to consider Greece’s proposals prior to the referendum. The ECB has stopped financing the Greek banking system. Therefore, experts predict a yes answer in a referendum.
Professor of Economics at the University of Piraeus in Greece, Senior Fellow at the Brookings Institution in Washington, Theodore Pelagidis, said RIA News": “It seems that the answer“ yes ”wins, Tsipras will lose his post. Even with the answer "no" Greek banks now belong to the ECB. He (Tsipras) will not be able to do anything ... After answering “yes” he will have to resign, this is the most likely scenario. ”
Comments from our readers:
Fat
Revolver
Kos_kalinki9
Delusion hegemon
25 June Vladimir Putin phoned Barack Obama. The leaders of the two countries discussed the situation in Ukraine, the need to confront the Islamic State and the general development of events in the Middle East. As for Ukraine, Mr. Obama stressed that Russia must comply with the commitments made under the Minsk agreements (including the withdrawal of Russian troops and equipment from the Ukrainian territory).
If the memory does not fail us, then the last time the leaders of Russia and the United States talked on the phone a long time ago - in the winter, in February 2015 of the year.
This time, Vladimir Putin reformed Obama a little. According to the press secretary of President Dmitry Peskov, Putin explained to his American counterpart that he was mistaken when he declared the presence of the Russian military in the Donbas. “It is easy to predict that the President of the Russian Federation responded to this. This misconception about the presence of Russian troops is broadcast by different leaders, and each time the Russian side gives its explanations ", - сказал Sands.
Comments from our readers:
larand
domokl
morpogr
We took up the calculators
29 June Canada expanded sanctions against Russia. The document, published on the website of the Canadian government, notes that fourteen Russian organizations and three citizens were subject to sanctions. Well, in the meantime, Canada introduces sanctions, others would very much like to “withdraw” them and count multibillion-dollar losses. According to some forecasts, the sanctions will cost the EU 1,9 million jobs and almost 80 billion euros. And here is a pessimistic scenario: the loss of more than two million jobs and one hundred billion euros of value added. Experts from the Austrian Economic Research Institute think so.
The assumptions and conclusions of the research of WIFO scientists differ from the data of the confidential report of the European Commission, which, however, was distributed only in “diplomatic circles”. The Commission believes that the impact of trade restrictions on the European economy will be "relatively small and easily manageable."
However, this is odd: it seems that even in the ministries of EU member states, not everyone is familiar with the confidential forecast from the EC. European journalists explain this classification of the document with the “fear” of the Russians: after all, if the document is disclosed to the public, the Kremlin will receive some important information.
By itself, the confidentiality of the data and the desire of Brussels to hide the forecast figures not only from the ubiquitous Russians, but, most importantly, from the peoples of Europe, who suffer from anti-Russian sanctions, already says a lot. It is not excluded that the European Commission fears revolts of those who in the coming months will take to the streets of European cities, losing their jobs. However, Brussels continues to dance to the tune of the United States and continues the policy of sanctions. Russia responds with counter sanctions. Canada will not scare Moscow here.
Giving the EC documents confidential status only adds gasoline to the fire. From such mystery in the European Union will certainly multiply pessimistic forecasts regarding the effects of sanctions. 80, and even 100 billions of future losses - it's flowers, berries in front ...
Comments from our readers:
Silkway0026
PValery53
Tatar 174
205577
All wrong guys
According to the latest sociological research "Pulse Opinion Research, LLC" and "Rasmussen Reports", Americans doubt the happy future of their country. 67% of respondents reported that the US is going the wrong way. And according to the WalletHub survey, patriotism was ordered to live long in the USA: if in 2011, 38% of Americans called their homeland the best country in the world, now their number has decreased to 28%. This is the voice from Europe: the Germans also believe that their government is doing everything wrong. According to the Süddeutsche Zeitung, the Eastern Committee of the German Economy called for the lifting of sanctions against Russia.
This is what happens, citizens? Do the peoples of the West believe that their governments are going the wrong way? But governments go anyway, and they even speed up the move?
“It’s strange that the rulers always want what the people don’t want,” Strindberg wrote in the Red Room.
What is this "best country in the world" if only 28% of inhabitants believe in its benefits?
Comments from our readers:
RuslanNN
shibi
Valga
* “Yes, yes, hot and completely white!” - a phrase from the movie “The Caucasian Captive”
After a number of “democratic” decisions taken by Ukraine, the blockade of Transnistria, sandwiched between Ukraine and Moldova, is being actively discussed. The discussion of this issue is heating up due to the fact that there are about 180 thousands of Russian citizens living in the Pridnestrovskaia Moldavskaia Respublika, a Russian peacekeeping contingent of about 1,4 thousand people resides, and the well-known provocateur Mr. Saakashvili, noted in the Ukrainian region adjacent to the TMR, Napoleonic "action in 2008 year.
Transnistrians did not shed crocodile tears, did not turn to international bodies for truth - they wouldn’t hear it anyway. It’s just that Foreign Minister Nina Shtanski took and wrote a letter to Chisinau, in which she clearly stated the Transnistrian position. And let Chisinau understand the letter as an ultimatum, but this is his own problems.
There will be a blockade of the PMR, which means there will be an answer: visa regime with Moldova, 100% protective duties, nationalization of Moldovan business and other “charms”. Something like this…
Comments from our readers:
Vasilina67
What great transnistrians! They did not begin to deliberate for a long time at once, clearly stated their position, albeit in a diplomatic form.
Alexander 3
Moldovans, scratch your turnip better, a bad world is better than a war. And how many Moldovans live in Russia? How many come to work? With a big and kind neighbor you have to live in peace.
aszzz888
Transnistrians are not particularly afraid. Apparently they feel the protection of Russia. And we do not in any way throw them.
And Nina Shtanski is very much even a minister of foreign affairs!
And Nina Shtanski is very much even a minister of foreign affairs!
Confession
The General Prosecutor’s Office of Russia received a request from a group of deputies of the State Duma of the Russian Federation regarding the legality of the exit of the Baltic republics from the USSR and the declaration of their independence. The request came after the Prosecutor General’s Office announced the anti-constitutional decision of 1954 on the transfer of the Crimean Peninsula to the Ukrainian SSR.
Of stories: the decision to recognize the independence of the Estonian, Latvian and Lithuanian SSR was taken by the USSR State Council.
Accepted, sorry what? And what exactly is this State Council? This is a body that is unconstitutional as well as the very recognition of independence by the Baltic "sisters". But how happy are you - we are independent, recognized by all, and therefore we have the right to give a voice, growling towards Russia with Baltic toy terriers ... Are you still growling? Then ... we will take, and we will revoke the recognition as the successor of the USSR ... Walk for a start in the "partially recognized", so that the arrogance is lost ... And the Swedes can already buy back the partially recognized ...
Comments from our readers:
Egoza
As stated in the "best traditions of the boyars in the Duma." In general, nerves are always useful for stinging ... suddenly they will demand the land to be returned, which the USSR has awarded? Or Russia paid its debts - so return your part of the debt ... and the Russian Empire bought "some" in general, and you were redeemed, the serfs of the Russian Empire? Money chase ... Oh! how many opportunities the petticoat has, and no NATO will help. Again, it is not clear that Russia this time started it!
SHILO
Empty case. But! But it will not be superfluous of course. At least nice vrazhinam nerves pull!
D-Master
Of course, it is necessary to prepare the legal base on the unauthorized collapse of the USSR and play after this card. As often as possible and wider. Someday this trap lock will click and create a precedent, into which we unwind all the spratland in parts. Russians always come back for their money sooner or later. Get ready gentlemen sprots, learn Russian.
Knn54
First of all, the Prosecutor General’s Office needs to deal with its liberasts, who helped organize the Baltic Gulyai Pole ...
Gas and liver
June 30 expired Russian discount on gas for Ukraine. By itself, the fact of having a Russian discount for Ukraine is already causing some kind of strange feeling - as if it is advancing into a bunch of excrement. But it is only because of the constant cries from the Ukrainian “friends”: “Russia is an invader aggressor! The aggression is more aggressive and more aggressive, ”plus the euro-pushing from under the American stick in the style of“ We need to resist Russian aggression ”already look like a deliberate parrot.
The Russian government has decided this time to offer a discount to the “fraternal” government of Ukraine, but in somewhat smaller volumes. The total gas price is 247,18 dollars per thousand cubic meters. Ukrainian, “friends-partners-partners”, you know, did not arrange such a price, they demanded to throw off “at least” to 227 bucks, but Moscow stayed with its 247,18: take it, want it or not. And Kiev, moving eyebrows, said: we will not take! .. Let's start, they say, again to negotiate the reverse and "tyringse", and in September - as it gets colder, and when the "tyring" ceases to be enough - let's meet and talk. In general, they included the fifth speed of "Square" ...
The inspiration to the Ukrainian side added the decision of the United States to open duty-free access for a number of Ukrainian goods before the end of 2017. The list of goods makes the Kiev authorities and citizens want to tighten the “Has not yet died ...” On the list for duty-free export, native Ukrainian products: meat of seals, walruses, dolphins, whales and sea lions, ostriches Emu, monkeys and monkey offal. Cruel trolling from the US Chamber of Commerce! It remains to be seen whether the internal organs of representatives of punitive battalions fall under the “duty-free” article? ..
Comments from our readers:
Alvog
And why do they need gas, if many enterprises have reduced their activities, and what will happen next, then the current authorities do not care. So they wander ...
SPB 1221
As the saying goes: "The East is a delicate matter, Petruha!" I mean politics. But the question arises, 29 kilometers from St. Petersburg, didn’t 10 take years? and just now they pulled a pipe to hold the gas in big gardening. And what is going on in our country? And then some kind of fascist v..dki require a discount on gas! Maybe it is worth sending away and providing the people with Russian gas, I think, Gazprom will receive money for it no less. I apologize for the emotions.
Reserve buildbat
The meat and entrails of primates ... That is, new batches of mercenaries will come ukram duty free. Perhaps then and the export of meat and viscera of primates should be legalized. Bodies with the "ATO" exported, now will increase the volume of deliveries.
The onizhedety switch is not a toy!
Since 00 hours 1 July Ukraine decided to disconnect the Crimea from electricity. This is another attempt to bring the situation on the Russian peninsula, which, by the way, is home to a lot of Ukrainian citizens, to panic. No panic happened ...
Realizing that the declaration of readiness to de-energize Crimea did not cause panic among the Crimeans and guests of the peninsula, they suddenly stated in Kiev that they did not intend to turn off anyone, and that statements about the power cut off were provocative journalists. Representatives of Ukrenergo confirmed the information that they did not start any energy war with the Crimea, and did not intend to undertake a venture.
Apparently, Kiev is testing the ground for what can happen in the Crimea if you really pull the switch, and how will Moscow behave? But Kiev may well have a seizure in which the hand of the main adherents of the Square will be pulled to the cherished button. Are you ready for this in Russia? Does Moscow have a pill that can help ukrovlasts in time with an attack to cope? Otherwise, otherwise the Russian Crimea will continue to depend on the degree of mental illness of the Kiev “managers”.
Comments from our readers:
Nicholas S
Despite Western sanctions ... for two new power plants in the Crimea ... Siemens will supply Technopromexport four combined-cycle gas turbines with a capacity of 235 MW with gas turbines at 160 MW.
Vsoltan
I am not an engineer ... but why didn’t they throw a cable to the Crimea as from Sakhalin to Hokkaido? Is it economically inexpedient or a different, distant calculation?
Mr.vasilievich
The West, trying to overthrow Putin, worsens the lives of ordinary people in Russia. It turns out the opposite-Putin support. Whether a similar tactic applies to Ukraine on the part of Russia is a question. I don’t know how to act, of course, but on an emotional level I want to close the gas altogether, not to sell electricity and coal. Maybe then the population of Ukraine will remove their (or American) rulers?
Grantosos
The Consumer Rights Protection Society, the head of which issued a “reminder” on the website of the society that Russians need to get permits from the Ukrainian authorities before going to Crimea, has again shown itself. This time, OZPP representatives are going to appeal to the Constitutional Court of Russia about the law on the entry of Crimea and Sevastopol into the Russian Federation.
Apparently, the amount of the grant this time is
Comments from our readers:
Major71
I do not even know how to write about this MIRACLE.
It turned out like this:
I now do not know who it is,
But since childhood, everyone knows this:
The more you touch it,
All the more IT turns.
It turned out like this:
I now do not know who it is,
But since childhood, everyone knows this:
The more you touch it,
All the more IT turns.
Ispaniard
The last BUNK of the proclaimed liberals? ..
Imperialkolorad
In general, I believe that the Crimea can be used as litmus paper to identify national representatives and grant winners.
Greenpeace Silence
In the so-called exclusion zone in the region of the Chernobyl nuclear power plant (Ukraine), once again in the last few weeks, great fires have broken out. The fires in the zone of radioactive contamination led to the release of radioactive elements into the atmosphere, which are spread by gusts of wind over impressive distances. The Ukrainian capital was again under the radioactive threat. The fires near Chernobyl rage with terrible force, and for some reason, the official representation of the world famous environmentalists Greenpeace in Ukraine is silent.
And why is Greenpeace straining? First, land troops in the area of burning Chernobyl forests and hang eco-posters on the Chernobyl sarcophagus - look for fools, and Greenpeace is not fools at all ... Second, Ukraine is not at all the state where Greenpeace is going to waste the money of its weighty fund. Here are plastic bottles in Yauza, a Russian drilling rig in the Arctic, forest fires in the Bryansk region, yes, and Chernobyl ... Well, what is Chernobyl? Just think - radiation ... It's not Greenpeace's thing to understand the gamma decay at a loss ...
Comments from our readers:
Serge Mikhas
Greenpeace has long since discredited itself as an environmental organization. And their actions are more like walks of majors with picnics paid for by bourgeois.
KOSTIA
It has long been known that this organization serves the interests of large corporations. And the protection of nature is just slogans.
They don't care about nature and ecology either ...
They don't care about nature and ecology either ...
Nomad
Greenpeace was not created to "fight" for the environment. It was created in the west to fight rival monopolies, hiding behind the struggle for the environment. There are no competitors in Ukraine - so Greenpeace keeps mum.
Will the city sleep peacefully in maples and acacias? Demilitarization?..
Deputy Chairman of the Parliament of the Donetsk People's Republic Denis Pushilin said that the leadership of the DPR unilaterally declared Shirokino a demilitarized zone. At this step, according to Pushilin, Donetsk went as a gesture of goodwill.
Information about the exit of the militia fighters from Shyrokyne was confirmed. Representatives of the OSCE mission went to Shirokino, who have already stated that after a complete cease-fire in the area of the settlement they are ready to deploy a permanent mission of a special monitoring mission here. For those who believed that the shelling in Shirokino was provoked precisely by the forces of the DPR militia, it should be interesting that even after the withdrawal of units of the army of the Donetsk People’s Republic, facts of a cease-fire violation were recorded. So, it remains - nothing at all ... To make Shirokino a completely demilitarized zone, Kiev needs some rolls (the Nuland rolls are not offered ...) to lure out the Azov fighters from there. Utter nonsense ...
Comments from our readers:
Ingvar 72
Do not throw beads in front of pigs. They will not appreciate it, and they will write it down in victory.
Boozer
Does the Bandera-fascists know what a “demilitarized zone” is? I think so, they are on the drum all this ...
Lyapis
That is, Shirokino goes under the control of the Armed Forces of Ukraine ...
Peace, friendship, chewing gum
Brazil and the United States announced the signing of documents relating to the cooperation of the two states in the field of defense (“umbrella agreements”). Negotiations between Dilma Rousseff and Barack Obama were held at the White House on June 30.
Recall that in 2013, Rousseff canceled the planned visit to the United States because information appeared in the media about wiretapping of her telephone conversations and viewing correspondence. At the current meeting in the White House, the presidents did not even mention the espionage scandal. In addition, Obama, who not so long ago with disdain spoke of Russia as a "regional power", noted that Brazil is a "global power". Probably, these words were a response to Dilma Rousseff’s recent statement about her trust in Washington. She also said that she did not think that the United States was watching her. According to analysts, Rousseff went to a new rapprochement with the United States for the sake of maintaining the Brazilian economy, which has been going through hard times: the country is experiencing an aggravation of the financial situation and budget deficit. In 2015, the economy is expected to fall by 1,3%.
Thus, Dilme Rousseff has nowhere to go, and she returns to the economic partnership (including in the military field) with the United States. The economic downturn dictates the appropriate policies. Past "offenses" are forgotten, from now on, Brazil "trusts" the United States and does not believe that Washington is tapping. In response to such courtesy, polite Obama calls Brazil a “global power.”
The last is clear: as soon as any state strengthens relations with the United States, it immediately raises its prestige. True, only formally. Russia also entered not so long ago in G8 and was considered an almost democratic developed country, but after deteriorating relations with the United States, Obama called it a “regional power”, and with a “torn economy”. And now Brazil, despite the recession and the crisis, one day almost broke into the world hegemons ...
Comments from our readers:
vsoltan
And now what is BRICS? Will wither away?
Talgat
No, of course.
Both India and Brazil, despite flirting with the United States, remain in all BRICS projects - and first of all in the currency fund and the bank with their “by 18%”.
Simply, the United States is a “world government” and a “world hegemon”, and so on. Ie, they don’t dare to openly challenge them even Russia and China dare - it’s not for nothing that they call their joint military exercises to repel mass naval landing or fight with atomic submarines "anti-terrorism". That is, these are now the terrorists have gone - in order to fight them, it is necessary to sink the nuclear submarines of the “terrorists”, then shoot down the satellites of the “terrorists”, and then repulse their naval landing forces on the Chinese coast.
In general, of course, Brazil and India seem to be weak links in BRICS: China is the future main adversary of the USA and the West, Russia gathers the EEU and the CSTO and also opposes the West, and these two can benefit from cooperation with everyone and at some point be over a fight like a wise monkey.
Both India and Brazil, despite flirting with the United States, remain in all BRICS projects - and first of all in the currency fund and the bank with their “by 18%”.
Simply, the United States is a “world government” and a “world hegemon”, and so on. Ie, they don’t dare to openly challenge them even Russia and China dare - it’s not for nothing that they call their joint military exercises to repel mass naval landing or fight with atomic submarines "anti-terrorism". That is, these are now the terrorists have gone - in order to fight them, it is necessary to sink the nuclear submarines of the “terrorists”, then shoot down the satellites of the “terrorists”, and then repulse their naval landing forces on the Chinese coast.
In general, of course, Brazil and India seem to be weak links in BRICS: China is the future main adversary of the USA and the West, Russia gathers the EEU and the CSTO and also opposes the West, and these two can benefit from cooperation with everyone and at some point be over a fight like a wise monkey.
Grbear
There is no reason to worry about Brazil’s participation in BRICS (the share of 18% in the Development Bank, which will start on Monday). This is not like the United States, but Dilma is not fooled.
The question is different. How deeply will the states fit into the economy and for how many dollars will be able to buy the elite and “liberals” of Brazil?
And the rest - multi-vector in action.
The question is different. How deeply will the states fit into the economy and for how many dollars will be able to buy the elite and “liberals” of Brazil?
And the rest - multi-vector in action.
Martin Dempsey blesses America to fight revisionism
There is a press release on the Pentagon website about the new US national military strategy. The adopted strategy, in the development of which the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the United States, Martin Dempsey, participated, envisages Washington’s struggle with “revisionist states”. The list of enemies includes Russia and the Islamic State.
According to the adopted document, the American army should be ready to fight “revisionist states”, such as Russia, because they violate international norms.
And what about Russia?
Recall, recently, Russian President Vladimir Putin said that Russia has no intention to threaten any countries. “We have not and cannot have aggressive plans. We do not threaten anyone, and we strive to resolve any disputable issues solely by political means, respecting international law and the interests of other countries, ”Putin’s words to Interfax were given at a reception in honor of graduates of higher military educational institutions. The President added that "Russia is an open country to the world, which is in favor of strengthening cooperation and partnership with all who are ready for this."
Let us ask ourselves: are we ready for the US partnership? Or their so-called allies, who, against their will, impose sanctions against Russia? Is Washington generally seeking partnership? No, that never happened. The United States has always gone to profit, to drain other people's resources, to impose its “interests” and finally to dominate the planet. The political ideal of the West is simple: every state for each step must seek permission from the Washington hegemon. Those who disobeyed, he becomes a threat to American "national security", is accused of "disrespect for the sovereignty of their neighbors", of "revisionism" and is recorded as violators of the "world order".
Comments from our readers:
RuslanNN
Listen to the mattress, so all around enemies, and they are the only ray of light in the dark kingdom. Although the very existence of the United States is a threat to world security.
Shick
If you want the people to be distracted from internal problems, create an external enemy, on which you can dangle all the troubles. Works in the USA, Ukraine, and with us.
Shiva83483
If we are enemies for them, then I, in particular, have a legitimate question: from what fright then these anxious about “democracy” baboons with star-striped sheets are called our partners? Maybe already enough to engage in verbiage and start calling things with their names? The liberal is a traitor, the oppositionist is a traitor to the Motherland, and so on. And with this tolerance it will carry us to where Makar did not drive giraffes ...
VadimSt
I wonder what the meaning of “revisionist” is, how does this relate to international norms? What “revision” (Latin revisio - revision) of international norms and in what way did Russia carry out?
If international norms are governed by the UN Charter, conventions and international treaties, then what is the revisionism on the part of Russia - in the reluctance to dance to someone’s tune or desire to protect their own interests? How does the concept of revision of international norms and their violation combine in one postulate, are these identical concepts? If all this is literally the same, then everything is as if Psaki was at one of the press conferences (in the same boot and with the barn book in 1000, nobody read the pages)!
If international norms are governed by the UN Charter, conventions and international treaties, then what is the revisionism on the part of Russia - in the reluctance to dance to someone’s tune or desire to protect their own interests? How does the concept of revision of international norms and their violation combine in one postulate, are these identical concepts? If all this is literally the same, then everything is as if Psaki was at one of the press conferences (in the same boot and with the barn book in 1000, nobody read the pages)!
Rules of conduct in the sky
When meeting with the Swedish Air Force aircraft, Russian military aircraft often undertake dangerous maneuvers, said the commander-in-chief of the Swedish armed forces, Sverker Joranson, during a seminar on the island of Gotland.
“Russian aircraft violate generally accepted rules of conduct. In particular, they are approaching dangerously close distances to Swedish aircraft, and in some cases even release false heat targets, ”Joranson said. The general is sure that such provocative actions of pilots "must have been approved at the highest level, otherwise they would not have behaved like that."
A little bit more, and the general would have started talking about the rush hour and about traffic jams in the sky - that the Swedish planes have to wait at idle, when all these impolite Russians, who cut the Swedes and even taxi to the opposite side, will fly by. As for the assumption of Joranson on the authorization of “defiant actions” from above, everything is simple. Before taking off from Red Square, the pilot of each Russian aircraft passes personal instruction from Comrade Putin, who reminds the pilot of actions in the event of a heavenly meeting with the Swedes.
Comments from our readers:
Telakh
Are our bombers chasing Swedish fighters? The sky is so small that it is impossible to fly just a kilometer so as not to get used to the Swedish aircraft, which by coincidence of chance decided to fly exactly at this point.
Vladimirets
Swedes are generally entertainers in sexual fantasies.
domokl
Interestingly, is there a military in Sweden? Is it really not clear that shooting starts when the equipment records the activation of the enemy's guidance system. Whether it's a plane or MANPADS ... It's hard to live with a wooden head, even in Sweden.
bif
The Swedish army violates the generally accepted rules of a neutral state, taking on its territory NATO troops and participating in joint exercises in the border with the Russian Federation territories ...
Found a braid on the stone
Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras said that his people should answer the demands made by international lenders (ECB, IMF and European Commission) during the referendum. We are talking about the decision on the further implementation of the "reforms" or the rejection of them without external blackmail. According to Tsipras, the referendum could pass 5 July. If the Greeks favor the continuation of “tightening the belts,” then Tsipras will have to obey the will of the people and accept the next aid package in the amount of 7,2 billion euros from Brussels. If the Greeks say no, then the EU will either have to refuse financial assistance to Athens and put the very existence of the eurozone in its present borders into question, or swallow an insult and give Greece a tranche. Tsipras himself asks voters to say no to the EU’s proposals for further cost reductions in exchange for external funding.
Tsipras is a simple political bargaining. He tells the voters that the answer “no”, leading to the refusal to accept the EU proposal, will give Greece the opportunity to knock out the best conditions at the negotiations.
On the other hand, the support program for Greece expired on Tuesday this week, and lenders refused to consider Greece’s proposals prior to the referendum. The ECB has stopped financing the Greek banking system. Therefore, experts predict a yes answer in a referendum.
Professor of Economics at the University of Piraeus in Greece, Senior Fellow at the Brookings Institution in Washington, Theodore Pelagidis, said RIA News": “It seems that the answer“ yes ”wins, Tsipras will lose his post. Even with the answer "no" Greek banks now belong to the ECB. He (Tsipras) will not be able to do anything ... After answering “yes” he will have to resign, this is the most likely scenario. ”
Comments from our readers:
Fat
The government always takes a loan, pours in the poorest “bankers”, then the bone is thrown to the people, the meat is divided according to its own. It pays for the bone and the people for the meat, and the banks fail, still robbing the people. Cool scheme. And so from year to year. Someone gets fat, and the naked people running around.
Revolver
That is, of the type to collect debts, waste money, and then tell creditors like "We will discuss family here and democratically vote, pay debts or forgive them creditors."
Moreover, it seems that about the same commentators on “VO”, which encourage (or, more correctly, “encourage”) the Greeks not to pay on loans, they are kicking Ukraine for a similar approach to paying debts. Well deserved, by the way, kick. That's just what the Greeks better ukrov? Similarly, they took and spent more than they could ever earn, and even organized their Maidan. Of course, the Greek Maidan looked fine on the background of the Ukrainian, well, so Greece is a small country, and again the scope of the Slavic soul was not enough.
Yes, by the way, about the Orthodox brothers - if Greece did not vote for EU sanctions against the Russian Federation, they would not exist, since according to the EU regulations such decisions should be taken unanimously. And for the bombing of Serbia, too, Greece once voted.
Moreover, it seems that about the same commentators on “VO”, which encourage (or, more correctly, “encourage”) the Greeks not to pay on loans, they are kicking Ukraine for a similar approach to paying debts. Well deserved, by the way, kick. That's just what the Greeks better ukrov? Similarly, they took and spent more than they could ever earn, and even organized their Maidan. Of course, the Greek Maidan looked fine on the background of the Ukrainian, well, so Greece is a small country, and again the scope of the Slavic soul was not enough.
Yes, by the way, about the Orthodox brothers - if Greece did not vote for EU sanctions against the Russian Federation, they would not exist, since according to the EU regulations such decisions should be taken unanimously. And for the bombing of Serbia, too, Greece once voted.
Kos_kalinki9
Well, the Greeks will go on tightening the belts. Well, give them 7 lard wrappers. And for a long time this will be enough? A year, two, and everything is new. Debt is not written off. Only tighter rope around his neck tighten. Think Greeks, think.
Delusion hegemon
25 June Vladimir Putin phoned Barack Obama. The leaders of the two countries discussed the situation in Ukraine, the need to confront the Islamic State and the general development of events in the Middle East. As for Ukraine, Mr. Obama stressed that Russia must comply with the commitments made under the Minsk agreements (including the withdrawal of Russian troops and equipment from the Ukrainian territory).
When?
If the memory does not fail us, then the last time the leaders of Russia and the United States talked on the phone a long time ago - in the winter, in February 2015 of the year.
This time, Vladimir Putin reformed Obama a little. According to the press secretary of President Dmitry Peskov, Putin explained to his American counterpart that he was mistaken when he declared the presence of the Russian military in the Donbas. “It is easy to predict that the President of the Russian Federation responded to this. This misconception about the presence of Russian troops is broadcast by different leaders, and each time the Russian side gives its explanations ", - сказал Sands.
Comments from our readers:
larand
And we hope that everything will somehow settle down by itself, we are constantly justifying ourselves, appealing to the common sense of "partners." And they regard our action-inaction as weakness and openly insolently, making us all new charges. The mistake of the Russian Federation is the non-recognition of the DPR and the LPR in May 2014 of the year, as well as the “persistent recommendations” to the republics on how to conduct combat operations. We have missed the situation, the sanctions are working, and Putin is being personally sued for a lawsuit in England for the downed Boeing.
Somehow all this is not like a bear.
Somehow all this is not like a bear.
domokl
The fact that the military phase will be no secret. The fact that it is prepared from the other side is the same. The only thing that is now really holding back the entire structure is the mutual impossibility of victory in this war. Kiev and New Russia are unable to win on a large scale.
Yes, and Russian energy is not yet fully pumped into storage. It seems that everyone has already refused a political solution to the problem. And the alleged dialogue, which now periodically goes on, is simply “on the machine” ... We talked, accused each other and dispersed.
Yes, and Russian energy is not yet fully pumped into storage. It seems that everyone has already refused a political solution to the problem. And the alleged dialogue, which now periodically goes on, is simply “on the machine” ... We talked, accused each other and dispersed.
morpogr
Judging by the trends of recent years, crises and disasters occur in August. So there is not much time left to wait, especially in light of the problems of the EU and Greece and the possible default of Ukraine at the end of July. A default in two European countries already looks like a pattern. Plus, our sanctions are for a year, which means that farmers in Europe are in a minus second year. And the banks that credited them will not wait. We are waiting for who in Europe will be the next weak link.
We took up the calculators
29 June Canada expanded sanctions against Russia. The document, published on the website of the Canadian government, notes that fourteen Russian organizations and three citizens were subject to sanctions. Well, in the meantime, Canada introduces sanctions, others would very much like to “withdraw” them and count multibillion-dollar losses. According to some forecasts, the sanctions will cost the EU 1,9 million jobs and almost 80 billion euros. And here is a pessimistic scenario: the loss of more than two million jobs and one hundred billion euros of value added. Experts from the Austrian Economic Research Institute think so.
The assumptions and conclusions of the research of WIFO scientists differ from the data of the confidential report of the European Commission, which, however, was distributed only in “diplomatic circles”. The Commission believes that the impact of trade restrictions on the European economy will be "relatively small and easily manageable."
However, this is odd: it seems that even in the ministries of EU member states, not everyone is familiar with the confidential forecast from the EC. European journalists explain this classification of the document with the “fear” of the Russians: after all, if the document is disclosed to the public, the Kremlin will receive some important information.
By itself, the confidentiality of the data and the desire of Brussels to hide the forecast figures not only from the ubiquitous Russians, but, most importantly, from the peoples of Europe, who suffer from anti-Russian sanctions, already says a lot. It is not excluded that the European Commission fears revolts of those who in the coming months will take to the streets of European cities, losing their jobs. However, Brussels continues to dance to the tune of the United States and continues the policy of sanctions. Russia responds with counter sanctions. Canada will not scare Moscow here.
Giving the EC documents confidential status only adds gasoline to the fire. From such mystery in the European Union will certainly multiply pessimistic forecasts regarding the effects of sanctions. 80, and even 100 billions of future losses - it's flowers, berries in front ...
Comments from our readers:
Silkway0026
No, well, well, cho, money from Europe is dofig, if cho, they’ll still borrow ... No wonder China has recently been making fun of G7, calling them a bunch of debtors.
PValery53
Oh how Europe freezes their ears in spite of Russia and in favor of America!
Tatar 174
Rather, the United States and Canada will freeze Europe’s ears in spite of Russia.
205577
This “little brother” of the United States is already beginning to get me something quietly.
Dear Canadians, you are very good at playing hockey, so do it. Just do not forget that you are an independent state, which, however, has a wild inferiority complex with respect to the US, boasts its independence, is ready to break the throat of anyone who hints at external control, but in fact is the most servile lackeing of the same US.
Something they remind me of the Japanese, on those of the USA two nuclear bombs dropped, and the Japanese have their submissive vassals in the APR, and moreover, the order of 10% of Japanese justify these bombardments! This is how you had to wash your brains! ..
By the way, a good recipe: if only Canadians stutter about real sovereignty, the United States will be happy enough with their democratic nuclear weapons, and Canadians will grow their sincere love for America several times.
In general, this “backyard” of the USA is very convenient, the need has arisen, and it seems that the Nazi criminals are not in the US (but near, very near, under their protection) they have attached, it is necessary - we will push the sanctions against Russia in the form of a steam locomotive , sponsoring the formation of a whole generation without historical memory ...
Yes, a lot of things are needed, and everywhere this Canada, which, until recently, was associated only with hockey.
Just forget the guys that when the lords are fighting, at the lackeys, the forelocks crack. If suddenly that, the United States "merge" them without thinking, but it is believed that this will never happen.
True, in the twenties of the last century no one, even in nightmares (or dreams), could assume that a destroyed, humiliated, impoverished Germany, without an army, left virtually without means of subsistence, only twenty years later would force all of Europe to urgently study the Kama Sutra purpose of taking the correct posture.
But it happened.
So, gentlemen, Canadians, would you be more careful in your actions, the world is changeable, uneven hour, America will end, what will you do?
Dear Canadians, you are very good at playing hockey, so do it. Just do not forget that you are an independent state, which, however, has a wild inferiority complex with respect to the US, boasts its independence, is ready to break the throat of anyone who hints at external control, but in fact is the most servile lackeing of the same US.
Something they remind me of the Japanese, on those of the USA two nuclear bombs dropped, and the Japanese have their submissive vassals in the APR, and moreover, the order of 10% of Japanese justify these bombardments! This is how you had to wash your brains! ..
By the way, a good recipe: if only Canadians stutter about real sovereignty, the United States will be happy enough with their democratic nuclear weapons, and Canadians will grow their sincere love for America several times.
In general, this “backyard” of the USA is very convenient, the need has arisen, and it seems that the Nazi criminals are not in the US (but near, very near, under their protection) they have attached, it is necessary - we will push the sanctions against Russia in the form of a steam locomotive , sponsoring the formation of a whole generation without historical memory ...
Yes, a lot of things are needed, and everywhere this Canada, which, until recently, was associated only with hockey.
Just forget the guys that when the lords are fighting, at the lackeys, the forelocks crack. If suddenly that, the United States "merge" them without thinking, but it is believed that this will never happen.
True, in the twenties of the last century no one, even in nightmares (or dreams), could assume that a destroyed, humiliated, impoverished Germany, without an army, left virtually without means of subsistence, only twenty years later would force all of Europe to urgently study the Kama Sutra purpose of taking the correct posture.
But it happened.
So, gentlemen, Canadians, would you be more careful in your actions, the world is changeable, uneven hour, America will end, what will you do?
All wrong guys
According to the latest sociological research "Pulse Opinion Research, LLC" and "Rasmussen Reports", Americans doubt the happy future of their country. 67% of respondents reported that the US is going the wrong way. And according to the WalletHub survey, patriotism was ordered to live long in the USA: if in 2011, 38% of Americans called their homeland the best country in the world, now their number has decreased to 28%. This is the voice from Europe: the Germans also believe that their government is doing everything wrong. According to the Süddeutsche Zeitung, the Eastern Committee of the German Economy called for the lifting of sanctions against Russia.
This is what happens, citizens? Do the peoples of the West believe that their governments are going the wrong way? But governments go anyway, and they even speed up the move?
“It’s strange that the rulers always want what the people don’t want,” Strindberg wrote in the Red Room.
What is this "best country in the world" if only 28% of inhabitants believe in its benefits?
Comments from our readers:
RuslanNN
Open the eyes of the people.
shibi
Is it possible that homosexually advanced nations can do something right? They even can not do children ... Forced to take away from normal families ...
Valga
They cannot change anything in themselves. They laid the program.
* “Yes, yes, hot and completely white!” - a phrase from the movie “The Caucasian Captive”
Information