Viskovatov V.V. "Historical description of clothing and weapons of the Russian troops from ancient times." Part of 1

13


Tsar Alexei Mikhailovich



Tsar Boris Fedorovich Godunov



Tsar Vasily Ioanovich Shuisky



Tsar John Alekseevich



Tsar Ivan Vasilyevich the Terrible



Tsar Mikhail Fedorovich



Tsar Fedor Alekseevich



Tsar Fedor Ioanovich



45. Russian weapons from the fourteenth to the half of the seventeenth century. Shelomy



46. Russian weapons from the fourteenth to the half of the seventeenth century. Shelomy



47. Russian weapons from the fourteenth to the half of the seventeenth century. Caps



48. Russian weapons from the fourteenth to the half of the seventeenth century. Shishaki



49. Russian weapons from the fourteenth to the half of the seventeenth century. Shishaki



50. Russian weapons from the fourteenth to the half of the seventeenth century. Misyurki-prilvitsy



51. Russian weapons from the fourteenth to the half of the seventeenth century. Misyurki-pleshniki



52. Russian weapons from the fourteenth to the half of the seventeenth century. Paper Caps



53. Russian weapons from the fourteenth to the half of the seventeenth century. Iron Caps



54. Russian weapons from the fourteenth to the half of the seventeenth century. Copper cap



55. Russian weapons from the fourteenth to the half of the seventeenth century. Erikhon



56-57. Russian weapons from the fourteenth to the half of the seventeenth century. Shields



58-59. Russian weapons from the fourteenth to the half of the seventeenth century. Shields



60. Russian weapons from the fourteenth to the half of the seventeenth century. Tarch



61-62. Russian weapons from the fourteenth to the half of the seventeenth century. Sword and sabers



63-64. Russian weapons from the fourteenth to the half of the seventeenth century. The broadsword, the konchar, the cleaver, the lap blades, the dagger, the knives of the sucker, and the knives



65. Russian weapons from the fourteenth to the half of the seventeenth century. Spears, jids and tassels



66-67. Russian weapons from the fourteenth to the half of the seventeenth century. Rogatin and owl



68-69. Russian weapons from the fourteenth to the half of the seventeenth century. Hammers and axes



70-71. Russian weapons from the fourteenth to the half of the seventeenth century. hatchets and chasers



72-73. Russian weapons from the fourteenth to the half of the seventeenth century. Shestopery and maces



74-75. Russian weapons from the fourteenth to the half of the seventeenth century. Poppers and Saadak Axes






77. Belonging to armed with the fourteenth to the half of the seventeenth century. Pokrovets on saadak



78-79. Russian weapons from the fourteenth to the half of the seventeenth century. Crossbows



80. Belonging to armed with the fourteenth to the half of the seventeenth century. wine cartouche



81. Russian firearms weapon in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. Samopaly or handhelds



82. Russian firearms in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. Samopaly or handhelds



83. Russian firearms in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. Carabiners



84. Russian firearms in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. Carabiners



85. Russian firearms in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. Pistols 86. Russian firearms in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. Ax and Pistol with Hatchets



87. Gun accessories in the XV, XVI and XVII centuries. Berendey. 88. Gun accessories in the XV, XVI and XVIII centuries. Natruski



89. Belonging to armed with the fourteenth to the half of the seventeenth century. Natruski



90. Russian weapons of the XVII century. Halberds and partisan



91. Belonging to armed with the fourteenth to the half of the seventeenth century. Righteous

13 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. avt
    +2
    29 June 2015 09: 31
    Well, nothing, but why repeat nonsense after the compiler of the album? Well this is, 52. Russian weapons from the 45th to the half of the 25th century. Paper hats "----- Actually, this was done from PAPER - cotton fabric on which metal plates were sewn, or sewn inside for the lining. Very good armor turned out and bullet-proof, well, depending on the thickness and if not point-blank , as well as a pair of Colt padded jackets XNUMXmm over XNUMX meters.
    1. +8
      29 June 2015 09: 52
      Let me clarify: the Colt is not "45mm", but 45-caliber or 11,43 mm. I don’t know about a couple of quilted jackets, I haven’t tried it.
      1. avt
        +3
        29 June 2015 10: 04
        Quote: zubkoff46
        The Colt is not "45mm", but 45 caliber or 11,43 mm.

        laughing And this I already laughed in the heat of the moment hi
      2. +2
        29 June 2015 20: 21
        I agree to clarifications for "BUMAZEY" and "45 CALIBER" ...
      3. +2
        29 June 2015 20: 51
        I don’t know about a pair of quilted jackets, I haven’t tried it.


        hi stop Also it is not necessary. am
        In our GSVG, in the year 87, scouts tried 5,45 fool , with the pouring of gunpowder out of the sleeve, through a padded jacket, one went on demobilization in zinc, and the second through prison. crying
      4. The comment was deleted.
    2. 0
      30 June 2015 11: 39
      I see the Mongolian saadak (composite bow) among many nations has taken root for centuries.
  2. +1
    29 June 2015 10: 14
    Norms, so the review is interesting ... oh, I'm sorry that it’s not in color heh heh I'm joking .... about 45mm I think people were mistaken (but this is the norm) I obviously forgot that the amers have an inch system .. so by the way of these 45k our German tanks in 41m clicked like nuts ... Nothing personal joke of humor ..
  3. avt
    0
    29 June 2015 10: 54
    By the way - for some reason, such a hat, like an armor, pull, or drag, for some reason it is considered armor for the poor. But this was the case with the tsars. By no means worse in terms of security than the "classic" metal.
    1. +5
      29 June 2015 12: 24
      Why and who thought so for the poor?
      Inconveniently, in terms of mobility, metal, but protection could provide better. And in the winter it was warmer, because in the summer only raiders-raiders fought - stole, drank, to prison.
      He was especially protected against shot-and-shot weapons. Pound it with a stick, a mace over the cuirass - and the same thing about the mattress - what will be the result of the efforts?
      ...
      Ancestors were not easy, oh not easy.
      It’s one thing to show off in forged armor, with gilding, blackening, etc.
      And another thing is to really chop.
      And then - restore the spoiled.
      Depreciation on horse hair, it seems to me, is less obtained than on forged inlaid steel.
      ...
      ...
      As for winter, I foresee questions.
      Not at all because in winter there are continuous roads to Russia. This is not the most important thing, especially since coastal aquatic vegetation greatly reduces the strength of the ramps.
      The main thing is to provide food. In winter, in cold weather, you don’t need any refrigerators; I put myself a sleigh full of sleighs and go for a drive until everything is eaten.
      In the summer, everything goes bad instantly.
      And the soldiers of one porridge will not be enough, like be.
      1. avt
        +3
        29 June 2015 13: 33
        Quote: Igarr
        Inconvenient, in terms of mobility, metal,

        No. There is one nuance - under the all-metal all-one sub-armworm and comforter must be thickly worn - on the naked body only in the movies. laughing
        Quote: Igarr
        but protection could provide better.

        High-quality sewn from high-quality material - yes. In principle, with a shortened sleeve, only hand straps / bracers add metal, well, to your feet, too.
        Quote: Igarr
        Ancestors were not easy, oh not easy.

        One stand-up collar, tall of which is worth - cheap, but cheerful and reliable.
        Quote: Igarr
        Depreciation on horse hair, it seems to me, is less obtained than on forged inlaid steel.

        Well, "cost - efficiency" and then quite appreciated for themselves. By the way - for some reason, the tyagil is considered exclusively Tatar, however, even before the "Mongol invasion", such a means of protection was quite enough for the soldiers in the infantry and in the cavalry.
      2. Wal
        +1
        29 June 2015 14: 20
        By winter, the entire harvest has already been harvested, the meat has been prepared, the whole people are bored, and it’s easier to overcome water barriers.
      3. The comment was deleted.
  4. 0
    29 June 2015 14: 37
    Tarch, what is it?
    1. Elk
      Elk
      +3
      29 June 2015 17: 38
      Fist shield. Designed for hand-to-hand combat. Usually it was a small round shield, with an extremely developed umbon. Sometimes had built-in blades.
      1. +3
        29 June 2015 18: 26
        Quote: Elk
        Fist shield. Designed for hand-to-hand combat. Usually it was a small round shield, with an extremely developed umbon. Sometimes had built-in blades.


        Add, it’s very convenient in trench and city battles ... Often, because of it, they shot from pistols ....
    2. 0
      7 July 2015 23: 08
      Quote: Amur
      Tarch, what is it?

      Smoke wassat