US military interested in flying motorcycle

39
The Pentagon is going to develop flying motorcycles in conjunction with the British company Malloy Aeronautics. Work in this direction will be carried out by a military research laboratory located in Maryland. Maryland Lieutenant Governor Boyd Resenford told reporters about this. In this regard, the American army, as they say, seized the initiative, since the project of a flying motorcycle, or hoverbike, which has been under development for more than two years, has recently begun to stall due to the lack of funds from the developers.

The author of the concept of a flying motorcycle was the Australian engineer Chris Malloy, who hoped to create a civilian version of the hoverbike and release it into mass production. At the same time the price of one motorcycle would be 40-60 thousand dollars. At the same time, he announced the collection of funds for the launch of the series, but the announced campaign gave deplorable results. Therefore, it is not clear at present whether work will continue on creating a civilian model, or whether the developer will concentrate all his efforts on creating a military version of the machine together with SURVICE Engineering, which works in the field of research and development of military technologies.



It is worth noting that initially the creators of the flying motorcycle promised to achieve impressive performance for their cars. The altitude of the hoverbike should be up to 3 kilometers, and the speed will be up to 278 km / h. At the same time, the flight range on one fuel tank should be 150 km, but the developers allow the possibility of installing an additional mounted attachment tank. As explained by the US military, the Pentagon has expressed interest in Hovierovka, since such machines are universal. Flying motorcycles can be an effective means of conducting aerial reconnaissance and surveillance, they can also move soldiers over difficult terrain. In addition, flying motorcycles have increased maneuverability compared with the same helicopters.

Initially, there was no talk of any military use of the new mode of transport. When a few years ago, an engineer from Australia, Chris Malloy, promised on the Internet to create a personal air vehicle that could be controlled as easily as a conventional motorcycle, it was purely about civilian technology. It is worth noting that the Australian and English engineers have been working on the project of their air motorcycle for more than two years. At the same time, they talk about the serious advantages of hoverbikes and full-size drones for military use in front of helicopters. In particular, they are safer, their survivability in combat conditions is higher, since they can fly without human control and be controlled remotely. And the cost of these devices is much less, the same can be said about their maintenance.



From the first stages of development, when the main element - carbon screws - were made by hand, and their core was filled with foam plastic, the technology significantly evolved. The design with two screws turned into a quadrocopter. The solution, which consists of rotating and overlapping rotating blades, is designed to reduce the weight and area of ​​the structure. At the same time in the folded state for transport quadcopter takes up even less space.

At one time, to prove the viability of its concept, Malloy Aeronautics built a model in Hampshire that was 3 times smaller than the original device. At the same time, it was equipped with a pilot model in order to demonstrate the ability of a hoverbike to carry a person, already then in the head Robot-pilot camera was mounted. It was the demonstration of this model that allowed the company to attract funding for further development. The created model of the device could stably perform the required maneuvers at different heights. At the same time, the full-size prototype of the device was tested only with safety cables that kept it at a low height.



Developed to scale 1: 3 from a full-sized sample, the model was given the designation Drone 3 Hoverbike. It was an unmanned aerial vehicle, which could be controlled in the traditional way using a remote control. Even then, the developers stated that the manned quadcopter they were creating would receive stable handling, good maneuverability and carrying capacity, becoming at the same time a unique vehicle of its kind. In 2014, development engineer Grant Stapleton said that hoverbike, in fact, is a helicopter - it takes off, flies and lands like a helicopter. The machine is designed to fly at an altitude of more than 2,5 km at speeds up to 200 km / h, noted Stapleton.

According to the developers, a full-fledged hoverbike will have increased maneuverability and stability in flight, will be able to be controlled by the operator and automatically follow the previously laid flight route or simply fly behind the person controlling it, like many modern unmanned aerial vehicles. The device can carry a significant load, while it is easily transported, takes up little space. Such flying motorcycles can be transported on C130 transport aircraft or ships, says Grant Stapleton, director of marketing and sales for Malloy. Many such devices can be located near the place where they will be needed or very quickly and easily launched right there, he noted.



According to the developers, the low price and practical dimensions allow using hoverbikes for rescue operations, as well as quick response measures and cargo delivery to hard-to-reach areas. Mark Butkevich from SURVICE at the Le Bourget Air Show noted that the Pentagon is really interested in this technology due to its multi-purpose use. With the help of a new type of transport, the military will be able to effectively move soldiers through difficult terrain, as well as use them for reconnaissance, air support and cargo transportation. The commoners can only hope that the air motorcycles will retain the status of dual-use technology and be able to find their niche in the form of a civilian vehicle.

It is worth noting that Malloy Aeronautics is not the only company that works in this direction. The American company Aerofex is also working on the creation of air motorcycles. The release of the commercial version of their development, they planned for 2017 year, while the price of the device was to make 85 thousands of dollars. The American company from California declared much more modest characteristics than their competitors from England. The Aero-X hoverbike developed by them, designed to carry two people, will be able to float above the ground at an altitude of up to 3,7 meters at a maximum speed of 72 km / h, allowing owners of devices to freely go without roads.

Information sources:
http://www.gazeta.ru/tech/2015/06/24/6852621/pentagon-will-consruct-hoverbike.shtml
http://rg.ru/2015/06/24/hoverbike-site.html
http://www.popmech.ru/artefact/46678-robot-letaet-verkhom-na-kvadrokoptere
http://www.hover-bike.com
39 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    26 June 2015 07: 05
    "... The flight altitude of the hoverbike should be up to 3 kilometers."

    "Well, you give a pancake" (C) "Features of national fishing"
    Above two kilometers, oxygen starvation begins, it’s possible to get into a hitch, you can’t organize a boost, but in general the topic is interesting, such an evacuation module can be organized
    1. +14
      26 June 2015 07: 09
      ETOGES what size eggs should be in order to climb 3 km on such a "broom"?
      Sometimes it’s scary to ride a ferris wheel with an open cradle, and even in the breeze, and here laughing
    2. 0
      26 June 2015 14: 55
      Quote: rosarioagro
      Above two kilometers, oxygen starvation begins,

      So the point is probably not to rise to this height, but in potential opportunities? That is, to evaluate the carrying capacity for example ..
    3. +2
      26 June 2015 17: 27
      Oxygen starvation starts from a height of 5 tons, and to this altitude all aviation flies without oxygen masks. On helicopters (for the most part) oxygen systems are not provided at all.
    4. +3
      26 June 2015 20: 10
      Quote: rosarioagro
      Above two kilometers, oxygen starvation begins,

      Have fun laughing
      There is no oxygen deprivation there at that height. Personally, he rose to 4200 in the Tien Shan, and the Sargardon pass 3700 above sea level, everything is fine. People climb Mount Elbrus, height 5 with a penny, is also the norm. Yes, breathing is more difficult, but not a disaster. Mexico, the capital of Mexico City, if I am not mistaken, the altitude of 2200 meters above sea level, in fact, the football championship was held and all were alive. laughing
      Another thing is that security must be at the highest level. You will blinch and will not collect bones, chances to survive near zero. Each time you carry a parachute with you, probably annoying.
      Again cool enough. No wonder that in the war our pilots used a warm jumpsuit even in the summer. At altitudes of more than three km, eternal snows often begin, and therefore temperatures are below zero. And this is in the mountains, when the soil heats up in the sun and the snow has to melt, the air will be much colder at altitude without heating from the ground.
      1. +1
        26 June 2015 21: 07
        Quote: K-50
        Break out and not collect the bones, the chances of survival near zero. Carry a parachute every time, probably annoying already.

        This can be solved by installing a high-speed parachute system MVEN "Cobra" - the device itself could withstand the additional weight and whether it will not worsen its LTH.

        Quote: K-50
        No wonder that in the war our pilots used warm overalls, even in summer.

        And now you have to pay a tidy sum for the uniform: even equipment for a biker costs a lot, and here - army overalls, shoes, a helmet, etc. for the army.
        An order of magnitude stronger, more reliable, more functional and more expensive.
  2. ICT
    +2
    26 June 2015 07: 18
    Quote: born_in_cssr
    what size testicles


    size is not important, but material lol

    and so the guys complicate things a lot,

    at this stage of development of technology only a helicopter,
    Yes, and the photo in the article seems to me all modelki based on quadrolet
    1. 0
      26 June 2015 15: 09
      Quote: TIT
      at this stage of development of technology only a helicopter,
      Yes, and the photo in the article seems to me all modelki based on quadrolet

      Remember when Leonardo Da Vinci designed his aircraft and when they appeared.
      1. ICT
        0
        26 June 2015 17: 26
        Quote: Mister X
        Remember when Leonardo Da Vinci designed his aircraft and when they appeared



        here is not the point, lovers who nadybali make money and try to push through

        Now is not 1920- 50 years, the whole theory for such devices is ready

        Here’s the test designer, how many years have passed from this plain-looking to a full-fledged car (and he just didn’t have a theory, but only in practice)
        1. +1
          26 June 2015 19: 35
          Quote: TIT
          here is not the point, lovers who nadybali make money and try to push through

          I agree.
          Everything accelerated and the people now went to the educated, new technologies and materials appeared.
          And at all times there were people who tried or even earned on military supplies.
          .
        2. 0
          26 June 2015 22: 40
          Quote: TIT
          Here’s the test designer, how many years have passed from this plain-looking to a full-fledged car (and he just didn’t have a theory, but only in practice)

          He just had enough theories
          in 1940 the first official flight was made by the Vout-Sikorsky helicopter "VS-300" ("S-46"). In September 1939, the construction of the VS-300 helicopter was completed, which had an unusual appearance: the fuselage was not even covered with canvas, the pilot was sitting in a small seat in front of the Lycoming 65 hp engine.
          People who worked with him in a group much earlier
          The first Soviet helicopter. Built under the leadership of Alexei Mikhailovich Cheremukhin. Piloted by the designer himself, he first flew in August 1930. Already in September 1930, Cheremukhin freely maneuvers in a helicopter 10-15 meters from the ground, and in late fall flies 40-50 meters, 2-2.5 times surpassing the official world the record set in the same year on the Italian helicopter Ascanio. Two years later, TsAGI 1-EA began to climb almost 300-meter height, and on a quiet August night 14 August 1932 year reached a height of 605 m. This record is 34 times Italian.
          So not the first, see dates
  3. +2
    26 June 2015 07: 23
    Engines are not very clear - it looks like electric, for the model it’s normal, I don’t know how to raise a person. And so the device is sensible, only expensive - although with what to compare, if with a helicopter like Robinson ($ 285 from the manufacturer, $ 000 in Russia), which should still raise 490000 people - a pilot and a fighter (passenger) is easy cheap. For special operations it’s just super, for combined arms - it’s spectacular, of course (new cavalry), but perhaps vulnerable ...
    1. +3
      26 June 2015 09: 47
      Quote: alex86
      Engines are not very clear - it looks like electric ones,

      The press announced 4-stroke engines.
  4. 0
    26 June 2015 07: 41
    Darn! We urgently need to learn to shoot "skeet"! It was still not enough to see flying niggas overhead.
  5. 0
    26 June 2015 07: 59
    Think of a bike again ...))) from this series the project ... only bigger)) and more expensive .. expensive ...
  6. ICT
    0
    26 June 2015 08: 01
    Quote: ILIA
    only more))


    that’s the question, which will not work anymore,
    1. ICT
      +3
      26 June 2015 08: 08
      for fun, you can try to find a video with people in flight of this mandala, and she certainly a couple of years
      1. 0
        26 June 2015 13: 36
        cool cuttlefish.
    2. +1
      26 June 2015 08: 13
      what will hurt ..
      1. ICT
        -2
        26 June 2015 08: 15
        Quote: ILIA
        what will hurt ..


        theory, such as aerodynamics
        1. 0
          26 June 2015 08: 18
          Enlighten please ... in my opinion a hot brick with motors can be added))) I would have had enough lift.
          I think I will not be mistaken if I say that the speed in a straight line of these crafts is not great ..
          1. +2
            26 June 2015 20: 40
            Quote: ILIA
            I think I will not be mistaken if I say that the speed in a straight line of these crafts is not great.



            And what prevents the pushing screw from the back? We’ll wait and see what happens, but given the development of batteries and generators, as well as the increasingly stronger and lighter electric motors, the day is not far off when similar machines will appear in one form or another. And the benefits are obvious! - Imagine, you can constantly move around in any area, you can fly over ravines, rocks, ponds. It would be a revolution for rescue! Well, for the army all the more necessary thing.
  7. +6
    26 June 2015 08: 26
    And they will do it ...
    Here is another one. The creators explain that their superbike is created in order to bridge the gap that exists between cross-country vehicles and light aircraft. That is, it is planned to create a completely affordable alternative to helicopters and aircraft intended for patrolling, search and rescue operations, surveillance, as well as to combat the results of natural disasters.
    1. 0
      26 June 2015 08: 32
      I'd rather be in the cockpit ....
    2. ICT
      0
      26 June 2015 17: 30
      Quote: Bayonet
      And they will do

      oh come on lol
  8. -3
    26 June 2015 12: 11
    It is good when the Americans invest tremendous amounts of money in projects that are useless and unpromising in terms of cost-result. It’s like developing a jetpack for airborne units.
    1. +1
      26 June 2015 13: 03
      Well, why without perspective. The idea is good and promising, the only problem is the engine is more powerful and more economical so that it is inexpensive to operate and the price affordable for buyers ... feel
      1. 0
        26 June 2015 13: 35
        only problem - the engine is more powerful and more economical so that it is inexpensive to operate
        Above you were told: "unpromising from the point of view cost-benefit projects ".
        Take off is not a problem, some won a land mine once in a lifetime. The problem is to do this in reasonable settings. In the case of military use, there are a whole bunch of such parameters. From gluttony and mechanical resource, to the level of visibility and bullet resistance.
        1. 0
          29 June 2015 12: 49
          Well, you can tell how much was spent on creating a jet engine and a propeller-aviation - it began to pay off according to the cost-result scheme relatively recently. And it is unlikely that developers and designers received dividends from the introduction of engines in a series ...
  9. +3
    26 June 2015 13: 42
    This is an evolutionary breakthrough that will allow ordinary people to move through the air. I thought it would be possible in 100 years, but now I think 30-40 years - and it will become mass, like a car, the Internet and mobile communications
  10. +3
    26 June 2015 13: 56
    Going back to the future, right?
    1. +1
      26 June 2015 14: 56
      Quote: ma_shlomha
      Going back to the future, right?

      Or maybe something else?
      Until they invent the gravitsapu in Rosnano, one can not even dream of it.
  11. -1
    26 June 2015 14: 13
    The author of the concept of a flying motorcycle was Australian engineer Chris Malloy.
    How plagiarism?
    Maybe someone else will invent a tank or worse? Everything was already there, do not give out other people's ideas as your
    Flying platform De Lackner HZ-1
    [img]http://lh5.ggpht.com/-B0AmPA4-gMY/Uoe28_9KLWI/AAAAAAAGg_M/RSJRQJoGqZQ/clip_
    image006%255B6%255D%255B9%255D.jpg?imgmax=800[/img]

    A similar type of aircraft was built at the end of the 1950's by De Lackner. The HZ-1 device was equipped with a motor with 40 horsepower, as well as two coaxially arranged screws that rotated in opposite directions, which avoided the rotation of the platform itself.
    The pilot was directly above the deadly blades, protected from falling only by seat belts. To control the device, a wheel similar to a motorcycle was used, with which you can change the direction, speed and altitude of the flight. To turn, it was necessary to tilt the entire apparatus in the right direction - the same way as on a motorcycle. At the same time, the maximum speed was slightly more than 100 km / h.

    A very similar device called the VZ-1 Pawnee was developed by Hiller Aviation in the same 1950's. Its creators hoped that the soldiers would have enough if not 20-minute, then at least two-hour introductory course to learn how to fly.
    The screws of the device, which had only 3 m in diameter, were sheltered inside a round case - in fact, they were tunnel-type fans. Moreover, tests have shown that the VZ-1 Pawnee itself strives to take a vertical position during flight: the tilted edge of the platform developed greater lift than the torn edge, as a result of which it leveled off on its own.
    To change the direction of movement, it was enough for the pilot to move slightly in the desired direction, shifting the common center of mass. Thus, the platform was almost impossible to overturn.
    1. 0
      26 June 2015 22: 25
      Quote: Denis
      Flying platform De Lackner HZ-1
      A very similar device called the VZ-1 Pawnee
      Aren't the same gravitsaps?
      Only much earlier
      1. The comment was deleted.
  12. +3
    26 June 2015 16: 44
    something like this wink



    1. ICT
      0
      26 June 2015 17: 15
      Quote: 0000
      something like this

      agree
      gyroplane is simple and straightforward, but there are some soya minuses, so far it’s not going to the masses either
      1. +1
        26 June 2015 20: 58
        Quote: TIT
        so while also not going to the masses


        Why doesn't it go? In Europe, at least the number of "Gyrocopters" is growing, they are mainly attracted by novice hobby pilots, or some businessmen can jump from place to place quickly without standing in traffic jams. There is even such a service, 2-seater gyrocopters, the cost of such a taxi is several times less than a helicopter one.
  13. 0
    26 June 2015 19: 26
    Quote: TIT
    there are some soya minuses so for now



    fear ___ fly))))
  14. 0
    26 June 2015 19: 50
    According to the idea, it can be controlled as a Segway, leaning back and forth .... Gas is only for height and speed ... And so, the gyroscope there is definitely necessary, to extinguish any changes in body position. And so cool! Once I flew to Ai-Petri, and not to nightmare on a serpentine !!! ))) And the price is very, very low, if a good land bike is a little cheaper.
    Oh! Dreams, dreams ... though, my grandchildren may even catch!
  15. +1
    27 June 2015 11: 30
    I don’t understand at all what all this fuss is about ... Back in the 80s, the guys from the Moscow Aviation Institute, and mind you, as part of a course project, did something similar in characteristics. And this something was really tested by a professional pilot and fully confirmed its capabilities. The design was ridiculously elementary: two propellers installed in ring nozzles (which simultaneously served as gas tanks) were fixed on one beam (a jump pole from D16T), on the other, the same beam, a seat was installed on one side and a V-shaped tail on the other. The beam with the propellers could move in two planes (along and across) relative to the beam with the seat, that is, all control was carried out by shifting the center of gravity. The engines were also home-made - 12-cylinder, based on cylinders from the Druzhba-2 chainsaw. The screws are planed from birch.
    And now - based on modern materials and engines - in general, everything should be elementary!
  16. 0
    27 June 2015 15: 47
    They still have reactive raincoats .....
  17. 0
    28 June 2015 18: 46
    ours seemed to be developing to -56 "wasp". but as far as I remember from the articles on this helicopter, they did not bring it to mind, although everything was ready.
    http://www.gen-corp.jp/Sozai/photo/Sun_n_fun01/Default.wmv вот например мелко серийный аппарат .