Reuters: Alexander Boroday did not rule out the possibility of Russia's intervention in the conflict in the Donbas

44
Former head of the Donetsk People's Republic Alexander Boroday gave a blitz-interview to the news agency. Reuters, which on its pages presented Borodaya as “the ex-leader of the Donetsk separatists” and especially emphasized that “Borodai is a Muscovite”. During the interview, Alexander Boroday said that, in his opinion, non-compliance with the Minsk agreements and the impending offensive of the Ukrainian army on the DPR and LPR may lead to the intervention of the Russian Federation in the conflict.

Alexander Boroday:
I am not sure that this will not end in a big war, since Russia cannot endlessly endure this ulcer on its borders. I admit that Russia may run out of patience.


Reuters: Alexander Boroday did not rule out the possibility of Russia's intervention in the conflict in the Donbas


Boroday criticized the statements of Kiev that Russia allegedly brought its troops into the Donbass. According to Boroday, if the Russian troops were actually sent to the Donbass, "now there would be no trace of the Ukrainian army on the territory closer to Donetsk."

Reuters in its material focuses on the fact that “Boroday left his post a few days after the fall of the Malaysian Boeing. If we consider that Boeing fell on July 17, and Boroday resigned from the post of the head of the DPR 7 on August 2014 of the year, then the fact that “in a few days” Reuters is clearly drawn by the ears.

Commented on Boroday and Western sanctions against him. The former head of the People’s Council of the DPR stated that sanctions were not a problem for him, since he was not going to be in the EU or the USA, and he had no accounts in foreign banks.

Boroday about the prospects of Donbass and Ukraine:
I think that all people, all normal people, ultimately strive for peace. But the problem is that sometimes the world is attainable only with the help of some kind of victory.
44 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +22
    25 June 2015 13: 19
    I am not sure that this will not end in a big war, since Russia cannot endlessly endure this ulcer on its borders. I admit that Russia may run out of patience.

    Everything goes to that, God forbid, of course.
    1. +8
      25 June 2015 13: 20
      During the interview, Alexander Borodai said that, in his opinion, non-compliance with the Minsk agreements and the upcoming Ukrainian army offensive on the DPR and LPR could lead to Russian intervention in the conflict.

      Beard’s reasoning is obvious, but you shouldn’t talk with your tongue .... or provocation? Which side is the former head of?
      1. +3
        25 June 2015 14: 18
        Quote: vsoltan
        Beard’s reasoning is obvious, but you shouldn’t talk with your tongue .... or provocation? Which side is the former head of?

        Here it’s not even so important on whose toron it is, it is important who and for what purposes uses it. Why did Reuters pull out this half-forgotten Beard? Who is he - an authoritative politician? Expert?
        A few meaningless phrases (yes, anyone could answer this question that our patience is not unlimited!), A mention of Boeing - and the hot news is ready! And there they will already comment on and analyze it properly.
        So really - "you'd better keep quiet!"
        PS Greetings, Vyacheslav! hi
        1. +1
          25 June 2015 16: 54
          Hey. ..not see you at all. ... ah, me too not very crying
    2. +1
      25 June 2015 13: 22
      It's time, put things in order on your doorstep, sweep out the garbage, so to speak.
      1. Bombardier
        +6
        25 June 2015 13: 31
        not much off topic:
        The U.S. Department of Defense has published new warfare guidelines. It reports that the enemy may act under the guise of a journalist. In this case, media workers are considered “unprivileged parties to the conflict.” According to experts, the media in this way is actually equated with the militants and it is allowed to open fire on them.

        The Pentagon in the new 1176-page "Department of Defense Instructions on the Rules of War" states that journalists in conflict zones can be equated with "unprivileged parties to the conflict." This is written by The Washington Times, a material cited by InoTV. This manual serves as a guide for the US military on how to destroy an enemy, right or wrong.

        continued: http://news.rambler.ru/world/30599578/
        1. 0
          25 June 2015 14: 49
          that is, in the anti-terrorist operation zone the APU acted within the framework of the American standard and the performers are not subject to criminal prosecution ...
        2. +1
          25 June 2015 14: 50
          Just legalized. Natsiks in Krajin have long watered for correspondents, though always for Russian for some reason. So, in your instructions, they specified which journalists they will shoot at? I give 100% that according to ours.
      2. +2
        25 June 2015 14: 17
        I think that all people, all normal people, ultimately strive for peace. But the problem is that sometimes the world is attainable only with the help of some kind of victory.

        I subscribe to these words ...
      3. mihasik
        0
        25 June 2015 14: 21
        Quote: Stalker.1977
        It's time, put things in order on your doorstep, sweep out the garbage, so to speak.

        It must first be brought inside the country, and in our country the ideology of the Yeltsin-American Constitution is prohibited! Touch open enemies no-no: Pluralism of opinions with us! Democracy!
        1. +2
          25 June 2015 14: 32
          Quote: mihasik
          Quote: Stalker.1977
          It's time, put things in order on your doorstep, sweep out the garbage, so to speak.

          It must first be brought inside the country, and in our country the ideology of the Yeltsin-American Constitution is prohibited! Touch open enemies no-no: Pluralism of opinions with us! Democracy!

          Well, suppose the constitution is corrected. And what ideology is there as the dominant one to write down?
          Perhaps it is better to be guided by some idea, which can unite society, and engage in real affairs, starting, for example, with patriotic education of youth, rather than pushing ideology into the constitution.
          1. mihasik
            0
            25 June 2015 17: 04
            Quote: andj61
            Maybe it’s better to be guided by some idea, which can unite society, and engage in real affairs, starting, for example, with patriotic education of youth, rather than pushing ideology into the constitution

            And I’m writing about this.
            Please explain what then you mean by the phrase "patriotic education"? Is this not an ideology?
            The ideology of a healthy lifestyle, the ideology of love for the land on which it was born, the ideology of the same biblical truths, which incidentally were strangely guided by the Communist Party of the USSR in their ideology, despite the atheistic plaque of propaganda, as moral guidelines for society. Can't find a match? And you compare! Very much surprised.
            So this is exactly what needs to be legalized in the Constitution as an ideology. The absence thereof in the basic law leads to the notion: "My homeland is where the ass is warm and do not care about morality!" Which again plays into the hands of lovers of the "witnesses of American democracy" sect.
        2. AUL
          +2
          25 June 2015 15: 39
          We already had ideology in the constitution. Swam, we know!
          Do you propose to return to this again? And what kind of ideology do you propose to play there? We have a lot of them, and each has its own. Who will choose the ideology? Sechin? Chubais? Deripaska? Nobody will ask you when choosing!
    3. +2
      25 June 2015 13: 34
      a little strange, what kind of Russia, says Boroday ... personal "fabrications"? request you need to be more careful with statements ...
      1. jjj
        0
        25 June 2015 13: 49
        And at the same time it is curious whether the West will refute Ukraine's intention to get into the next cauldron. And so this is a warning that the next "Minsk" may not be
      2. +1
        25 June 2015 16: 22
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        you need to be more careful with statements ..


        I absolutely agree +! drinks

        And then .... Alexander Boroday:
        "I'm not sure that this will not end in a big war, since Russia cannot endlessly endure this ulcer on its borders. I admit that Russia may run out of patience."

        1. Not sure? .. Do not overtake lol
        2. Tolerate and .. will endure ulcers and discounts and debts and .. other, other, other ... fate, "you understand" .. such " wassat
        3. Anything can be admitted, but .... "tolerated" this ... fate recourse
    4. +1
      25 June 2015 13: 51
      How to treat? Hope for God, but don’t be fooled. We will have to treat at our expense. Bandera killers from prison are already joyfully carried out as national heroes. Brain therapy and intimate conversations will not help here. To the table! It is the matter of time.
    5. +1
      25 June 2015 13: 54
      Guys, I give a link to Strelkov’s interview. What he thinks. He speaks there himself and not the Kurghins with his comrades. Http: //newsland.com/news/detail/id/1563869/
    6. 0
      25 June 2015 13: 56
      Who is this beard now.
      None. No one is the same as the rest of the chantrap, which has faded from the Donbass.
      Okay, Strelkov is the hero of Slavyansk, but who is the bearded man at all?
      Pawn. Won back ...
    7. +1
      25 June 2015 14: 01
      I wonder how then will chocolate explain the defeat of his army? She, in his words, is one of the most combat-ready on the continent.
    8. 0
      25 June 2015 15: 56
      Yes, not everything goes to this. Russia has a lot of patience (as history shows). The question is that we were surrounded, we are exhausted before we finish off, a kind of bear hunt ... The Anglo-Saxons are afraid with their own hands to "rake in the heat", to go to the bear, so they send their mongrels to wear down the bear. So what am I doing ?! And to the fact that Russia will be drawn into the conflict not when she runs out of patience, but when they attack us. Well, it's a matter of time, they are preparing, but they just don't see. They are pulling together their troops, armored vehicles, missiles, missile defense, ships ... Absolutely everything! They hope that Europe will be the first to take over the battle, and then they will finish off Russia ...
      BUT! As history has proved, There is no one in the world who can defeat Russia, God is with us, truth is with us.
    9. 0
      25 June 2015 18: 46
      It seems that Russia already understands everyone on whom the Kiev Bonderava power should understand if they do not force Kiev to fulfill its obligations under Minsk-2. then Russia will solve this issue in its own way!
    10. 0
      25 June 2015 19: 58
      Quote: pomegranate
      I am not sure that this will not end in a big war, since Russia cannot endlessly endure this ulcer on its borders. I admit that Russia may run out of patience.

      Everything goes to that, God forbid, of course.

      Now there is an information war - a war of nerves and I would not particularly trust such information, even considering that this interview was given by Borodai.
  2. The comment was deleted.
    1. +11
      25 June 2015 13: 28
      Quote: vsoltan
      Beard’s reasoning is obvious, but you shouldn’t talk with your tongue .... or provocation? Which side is the former head of?

      Boroday does not have the authority to make official statements on behalf of any state, especially Russia. This is just the opinion of an ordinary citizen, only more competent in some matters.
      1. 0
        25 June 2015 13: 49
        Quote: Svetlana
        Boroday does not have the authority to make official statements on behalf of any state, especially Russia

        But you forget that (Alexander Boroday gave a blitz interview to the Reuters news agency)
        And if you omit this, you can hang many dogs on it.
  3. +4
    25 June 2015 13: 20
    Well, what for did he say that? Now all the "pro" - well-known media will carry it !!! in a known way!

    "Bloody gebnya" - this is how each correspondence of this message will end.

    1. +5
      25 June 2015 13: 33
      Quote: DEZINTO
      Well, what the hell did he say that?

      I agree! Not far-sighted. Lai will definitely rise somewhere.

      There are two ears, and one language is not given by chance -
      Listen twice and speak only once!
      (Omar Khayyam)
  4. +1
    25 June 2015 13: 21
    Is it interesting his thoughts or someone suggested voicing?
    1. 0
      25 June 2015 13: 45
      Quote: Kil 31

      Is it interesting his thoughts or someone suggested voicing?

      It does not look like a thoughtless chatter, but it looks very much like a provocation, the goal is really not clear.
      1. +1
        25 June 2015 14: 16
        Quote: Andrea
        Quote: Kil 31

        Is it interesting his thoughts or someone suggested voicing?

        It does not look like a thoughtless chatter, but it looks very much like a provocation, the goal is really not clear.

        So I'm about the same. From which side of the speech or PR itself.
  5. The comment was deleted.
  6. +4
    25 June 2015 13: 22
    It is a pity that people who are sick of the "Novorossiya" project are quietly removed and they do not always leave their posts voluntarily!
  7. +1
    25 June 2015 13: 25
    After the assaults on Igor Ivanovich - he became somehow cloudy. And his "prophecies" and the little pioneer are clear as a pie in a buffet. The question is what he is - Schaub has not forgotten how he is.
    1. 0
      25 June 2015 13: 51
      For monks. Recently, Igor Ivanovich himself has questions above the roof! He will soon agree to an ardent oppositionist! In general, Strelkov's respect was diminished after his last tricks, in all kinds of yellow media!
  8. 0
    25 June 2015 13: 26
    Something these aks are painfully talkative. They carry what. You must be more modest, more modest. And people will stretch, and less reason for the screech of the liberoid press, and surprise enemies.
  9. +1
    25 June 2015 13: 28
    Politics is a dirty thing, but money always stands behind it.
  10. 0
    25 June 2015 13: 29
    Well, whose cow was silent, so this is Mr. Boroday.
  11. +1
    25 June 2015 13: 29
    ... He went into the overcoat of an infantry model, and immediately began to blur out state secrets in the hallway ...

    From the notebooks of Ilf and Petrov
  12. +16
    25 June 2015 13: 34
    Well, something like this...
  13. +1
    25 June 2015 13: 36
    Naturally, everything will not end by itself, and God forbid that Russia would have the patience, that it would not be in a rough form .... to work on this regime, these naughty games will be played out ... ki. soldier
  14. +6
    25 June 2015 13: 39
    "the problem is that sometimes peace can only be achieved with some kind of victory"...

    Well said...

    And in vain he is accused of grinding his tongue in vain ... He did not say anything directly about the possibility of Russian interference - this is already distorted by reporters ... His phrase: "Russia may get tired of enduring this ulcer on its borders" ...

    The Reuters agency presents his phrase in the way that it is beneficial for HIM and HIS owners ... Plus, a distortion of the dates of his departure and the fall of the Boeing ... In short, foreign mediamen should also be sanctioned ... Vyaknul - distorted - answer for your words .. .
  15. +2
    25 June 2015 13: 46
    Quote: Kil 31
    Is it interesting his thoughts or someone suggested voicing?

    And what, in fact, did he "sound" that? That, hypothetically, he does not exclude the entry of Russian troops into the territory of Ukraine? This is a "sensation"! And I hypothetically do not exclude the fall of the asteroid on the building of the Verkhovna Rada. Borodai and Strelkov's departure from the Donetsk political Olympus served to ensure that there were fewer reasons for such "hypothetical" reasoning.
  16. +1
    25 June 2015 13: 52
    Good always conquers evil, it was, is and will always be.
  17. 0
    25 June 2015 13: 59
    Quote: vsoltan
    During the interview, Alexander Borodai said that, in his opinion, non-compliance with the Minsk agreements and the upcoming Ukrainian army offensive on the DPR and LPR could lead to Russian intervention in the conflict.

    Nobody excludes this, but ... here is the probability of this step ...?
  18. +1
    25 June 2015 14: 02
    If in Transnistria they don’t run into peacekeepers, then the militias will cope themselves. And so the serious mix will go already with the NATO. Then they won’t remember about Ruin, it won’t be all. It was already written off as an expense.
  19. +2
    25 June 2015 14: 05
    This interval is a bit provocative in nature, and if you take into account that Borodai is now in the status of the former, no one will take it seriously, it’s so easy to remind yourself once again.
  20. 0
    25 June 2015 14: 10
    Everything is possible. Russia is pushing it to war by all means. Of course, I would like it to not happen ... stop
  21. +1
    25 June 2015 14: 16
    Unfortunately, Russia is in such a position that it will not be able not to react by force if the provocation goes beyond certain limits. The enemies of Russia know this, they also know the framework, and now "the ball is on their side of the field" ...
  22. +1
    25 June 2015 14: 35
    I would not trust all these "hackers" from the "free media" very much, and taking into account the latest "antics" of Washington businessmen, it becomes clear "where the wind is blowing from." Of course, enduring forever this "powder magazine" near its borders is "more expensive", but you still have to calm down the "restless" and, in a sense, even "violent" neighbors (but neatly, as the brave soldier Schweik answered the question - And you can shoot here ? -Maybe, just be quiet)! And in principle, there are no fools to fight directly with Russia, even in the United States and Europe, although a few "idiots" like McCain remained for the "fun" of the people and vassals), Psaki and her successors do not seem to be able to cope! And then what good will have to buy beer in Western supermarkets for rubles (the memory of these figures has not completely left them, they remember what soldiers' footcloths smell like)!
  23. 0
    25 June 2015 15: 23
    That's really nafig-nafig .... Borodai offers the Russian Federation to get into this garbage? Enemies of Russia have already been struggling for more than a year to drag Russia into the war "fig knows why, fig knows why" and apart from hemorrhoids, even in case of "victory" (which cannot be there due to the banning of the population) there is NOTHING shining there ! Borodai would have better talked about the percentage of the mobilization resource of the DPR-LPR (they cannot even unite with each other on one square meter). It seems that few people want to defend their home. Ukromentalitet- it is ukromentalitet, regardless of the "east-west". All of them should and are obliged to build a bright future for them. There is only one difference: Obama is reported to the EU by one, Putin and the Russian Federation to the other. YOURSELF, lads! YOURSELF! And those about others! NOBODY WILL BE FREE! Get out of the habit if you're used to it!
  24. 0
    25 June 2015 15: 25
    But it’s interesting; can they really go to war with us?
  25. 0
    25 June 2015 15: 26
    The shooter and beard are both from the environment of the Orthodox oligarch Malofeev.
    My impression so far is one, their goal is to draw Russia into the war with Ukraine.
    You should have seen Borodai near Sobchak on Rain cheerfully inform that the Novorossia project is premature and will be closed.
  26. 0
    25 June 2015 15: 53
    Do NATO really not understand what it means to escalate the situation around Ukraine and in general in a smelly geyrop can end in a military conflict? Although NATO is only the United States, and not everyone there like Hollande, but Merkelikha-Babariha ...
  27. 0
    25 June 2015 16: 11
    Crimea in Russia, but sewn with crooked stitches, in poppykh - mowing.
    In order to optimize the costs and logistics of the supply of goods, energy, water, provide tourist accessibility (rather than wait for the ferry for 2-3 days when the sea is rough), you need a land corridor. So you need Mariupol. Militias can take it (and what to lose - sanctions are still extended anyway), and it’s better to settle the matter with the people watching over Mariupol before they can change the roof.
  28. 0
    25 June 2015 18: 31
    Quote: Svetlana
    Quote: vsoltan
    Beard’s reasoning is obvious, but you shouldn’t talk with your tongue .... or provocation? Which side is the former head of?

    Boroday does not have the authority to make official statements on behalf of any state, especially Russia. This is just the opinion of an ordinary citizen, only more competent in some matters.

    Each citizen voluntarily or not speaks on behalf of his country. And if there is an order, people will go not only by order. Many in Afghanistan followed the idea.
  29. +1
    25 June 2015 23: 42
    About how Russia directly intervenes in the conflict, we have been hearing for a year and a half.
  30. 0
    26 June 2015 01: 57
    To endure an ulcer - Ukraine chtol)))
  31. 0
    26 June 2015 13: 37
    someone should take responsibility and fist on the table otherwise this mess will never end (
  32. 0
    26 June 2015 16: 56
    It doesn’t matter to everyone how and how to solve this problem. She was just tired of everyone. ALL. And geyrope and the United States, now everything will, as usual, depend on what Russia says and does. A game, and not just a game .. At stake is how the world will look in the future ..