The reincarnation of the “Rook”, the modernization of the Su-25 attack aircraft

24


Already at the beginning of World War II, it became clear that the main enemies of the assault aviation are fighters and small-caliber anti-aircraft artillery. And if enemy fighters can fight their fighters in battle, then it is very difficult to manage without entering the MZA coverage area.

This problem has been hanging over attack aircraft so far. That the domestic Su-25, that the American A-10 Thunderbolt II are at risk of being shot down directly above the target. This risk is especially great when using barreled weapons, and for the same A-10, for example, the gun is the main anti-tank weapons. In turn, the use of bombs also forces the attack aircraft to come close enough to the target.

The Soviet experience of hostilities in Afghanistan has shown that the main danger for an attack aircraft in the current war is not cannon armament, but MANPADS. The Americans also made similar conclusions after the “Storm in the Desert” and confirmed them in subsequent conflicts in Asia.
In 2006, the United States adopted a new modification of its aircraft - A-10C. He has the ability to carry guided weapons. First of all, this was done so that the aircraft could “work” on the target, without getting under the anti-aircraft protection systems - MANPADS and machine guns / cannons. In the coming years, the Pentagon intends to retool all existing A-10 into this modification. The financial side of the issue is “total” 420 million dollars. But all-weather "Thunderbolt" add and did not work.

What about us? At about the same time, work began on the modernization of the Su-25. By the end of the 90-x project was prepared, and in the 2000 year began testing an experienced aircraft. The modification with the name Su-25CM received a new sighting equipment - the PrNK-25SM Bars complex, a new cabin equipment, including a full-fledged HUD instead of the old “ordinary” sight. Also, “Grach” in the “SM” version receives a built-in radar RLPK-25SM and equipment for working with the GLONASS system. The goal of all these avionics updates is the ability to fully utilize guided weapons, including in difficult conditions. In particular, it can be air-to-surface missiles of the X-29 family with a range of more than 8-10 km. But the unguided weapon will remain in the attack aircraft arsenal - sometimes it is simply inappropriate to spend an expensive “smart” missile on a target instead of a cheap unguided C-5 or C-8. Of course, if the situation allows. And thanks to the new sighting and navigation system, the Su-25CM has greater accuracy in the use of unguided missiles.



As for the bomb weapons, the new avionics allows bombing in adverse weather conditions, and at night. Moreover, the sighting equipment "sharpened" for such tasks. Another innovation of sighting equipment is the ability to accompany and attack two targets at once in one go.

For self-defense, the Su-25CM can carry and use not only the already familiar short-range air-to-air missile P-60, but also the medium-range missile P-27Р, RVV-AE.

In September, the Chief of the General Staff, N. Makarov, said that the purchase of guided weapons for the Air Force would increase. In the light of the modernization of the Rooks, this statement looks logical and timely. And the producers of this very guided weapon are probably not against new orders. At the same time, Makarov made a reservation that not all available aircraft could work with “smart” weapons.

Now about the volume of future modernization. Currently, the Russian Air Force has about two hundred Su-25 of various modifications. About a hundred more are in storage. The last re-equipment is not planned yet. In addition, four dozen aircraft have already been brought to the version of “SM” in 2007-10. Then it was engaged in 121-th aircraft repair plant in the Old Town (Moscow region). The cost of refitting one aircraft in the 2007 year was about 50 million rubles. Since then, the economic situation has changed and prices have increased - now similar work is estimated at 110-120 million rubles. Nevertheless, this cost of modernization remains profitable. The fact is that airplanes need to be improved, and the construction of a new Su-25CM will cost more than millions in 400. Another argument in favor of upgrading old aircraft is industrial expediency. 121-th ARZ will be able to retool, with which he has already coped well, and for the construction of new aircraft it will be necessary to attract the Ulan-Ude aircraft plant, which is already loaded enough.

In addition to installing new equipment, the overhaul of the aircraft will be carried out during the upgrade, which should increase the Rooks life by 15-20 years. Thus, with timely updates of avionics, Su-25CM will be able to remain in the troops until the end of the 20-s.
24 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Sergh
    +1
    18 October 2011 09: 10
    A-10 Thunderbolt II is the same as ours is being upgraded, this is a normal option.



    The need to modernize the Su-25 is due to the requirements for increasing combat capabilities through the use of an airborne radar and expanding the range of weapons. This modification was developed at Sukhoi Design Bureau - Su-25SM.

    The Russian Air Force issued an order for modernization work and allocated the necessary appropriations. The Air Force Commander-in-Chief Kornukov obliged to conduct the ROC for 2 years with the allocation of the necessary funding. The decision to modernize the Su-25 concerns not only Russian enterprises - it is planned to involve enterprises of Ukraine and Belarus in the implementation of this Russian program. Russian specialists will conduct training for workers and specialists.

    The cost of modernization is approximately $ 2,5-3,0 million per aircraft. The cost of selling "surplus military property" in the form of Su-25 attack aircraft with practically "zero" flying time is $ 3,5-5,0 million.



    Su-39 is a modernized version of the Su-25T.

    1. kesa1111
      -3
      18 October 2011 10: 19
      The A10 cannon pierces our tanks through, in all projections from 4 km. We have no analogues yet.
      1. 0
        18 October 2011 10: 36
        And "Kalashnikov" punches the rail. through and through, along and with a bayonet, yeah. fellow
      2. +5
        18 October 2011 10: 47
        A-10 was created around the gun - at first they made an excellent gun, and then they began to think how to teach it to fly.
        I personally observed A-10 at the base in Willow Grove, PA, and Su-25 at the airport of the 102 base in Gyumri. Both are impressive.

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zhPwaApe4Rk
        1. makrus
          0
          18 October 2011 15: 28
          This unit is exceptionally good for work on convoys of refugees. In modern combat, at the range of the aimed fire of this thing, it is quite possible to "get away" from a portable air defense system.
      3. 0
        18 October 2011 11: 21
        Quote: kesa1111
        in all projections from 4 km

        from 4 km? But what is the caliber of this device? A plane does not blow when shot?

        For information:

        Caliber and brand of gun 125-mm 2A46-1
        gun type smoothbore gun
        Barrel Length, 48 Caliber
        Firing range, km up to 5 km with anti-tank missiles and up to 3.7 km with sub-caliber shells
      4. raf
        -7
        18 October 2011 11: 42
        Yeah, kesa1111 here you blurted out about the gun! wink
        1. kesa1111
          -1
          18 October 2011 13: 15
          See: Discovery Rate of Fire
          1. mitrich
            -7
            18 October 2011 18: 20
            Boo ha ha ha wink wink wink wink !!!!!!!!!!!!!

            This is me about comments cache, if anyone did not understand. They are even more interesting than the article itself. wink !
      5. +4
        18 October 2011 13: 55
        Question - why should an attack aircraft shoot a tank from a 30mm cannon?
        The answer is, what can you endure with such a gun? sight, means of communication "if possible, kill the tracks

        GSH-30-2, according to a number of indicators, a more powerful weapon. Defeat of a tank covered by air defense forces with a 30-mm cannon in modern combat - to put it mildly
        Well, for starters, the defeat of the tank from the guns of the stormtrooper tank in the sight, at a speed of 500 km an hour, is that of field mice from pneumatics into the vagina
      6. 0
        18 October 2011 16: 12
        http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/GAU-8_Avenger

        read kesa1111.
        1. slan
          +2
          28 October 2011 23: 04
          Quote: Matroskin
          read kesa1111.

          And Kesha doesn’t like to read, much less think, but he minus with at least 11 nicknames. Or is there 10 more eccentrics on the site? ..
          Quote: kesa1111
          A10 cannon breaks through our tanks, in all projections from 4 km

          Masterpiece)))
      7. -8
        18 October 2011 16: 36
        hahahahahahahahha well you give, it seems you were sitting in such a tank and the tower was definitely perforated !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
      8. mga04
        -3
        19 October 2011 11: 41
        it's funny. Why then does he need rockets?
        1. slan
          +1
          28 October 2011 23: 08
          Quote: mga04
          it's funny. Why then does he need rockets?

          Obviously, a column of armored vehicles should be pierced through and through.
  2. boos24
    +2
    18 October 2011 10: 10
    The bird class after modernization will serve faithfully for a long time
  3. kesa1111
    0
    18 October 2011 10: 18
    The A10 cannon breaks through our tanks in all projections from 4 km away. We have no analogues yet.
  4. cohort
    0
    18 October 2011 11: 51
    It is necessary to shoot from the cannon with the A-10 from a distance of 1,5 km, which is not a gift with tungusks, arrows and other memory. At some of our aviation forums it was joked that if there were apartheid in the USA, then only Negroes would fly to A-10.
  5. cohort
    -1
    18 October 2011 12: 07
    The A-10 has a Maverick to combat tanks.
  6. cohort
    -1
    18 October 2011 13: 25
    And what immediately minus?
    AGM-65 "Maverick" (Eng. Maverick, literally "tramp") - an American tactical missile class air-to-surface.

    Designed for the rapid application of high-precision strikes against the enemy. The missile allows you to destroy well-armored and moving targets in urban areas.

    In 1991, they were actively used by the Americans in the war with Iraq.
    Once again I say they will not shoot from our guns at our tanks. The rocket has a range of up to 28 km. A-10 let her with a bang.
  7. Anatoly
    +3
    18 October 2011 17: 45
    I think that disputes are useless until in a real battle both A-10 and Su-25 and Tunguska, etc.
    God forbid, this will not ....
    1. -1
      26 October 2011 00: 02
      Rook and Warthog if they meet in battle, then one of them will be at the airport, and the second - in the air. Because they were not made for air battles.
  8. ICT
    -1
    18 October 2011 21: 21
    the modernization should end with the fact that it is on the suspension on the middle photo of the laid out "Sergh", and then how to bomb someone, then AGAIN C-5 hang well on the C-25
  9. L. konstantin
    -2
    19 October 2011 01: 18
    I see here the bulk is not boom boom. but it builds itself nobles. you probably already borrowed all the search engines and wikipedia)
    1. Anatoly
      +2
      25 October 2011 23: 21
      And we are all ordinary people here. readers and reviewers. Nobody claims to be an expert, but we respect the opinion and information from everyone.
  10. +1
    4 December 2011 17: 23
    That's what I like about the Su-25, because the pilot is perfectly protected. The various wars that he went through prove it, it’s kind of small, but it takes a lot of load. Yes, he beat a lot of majahideen. For pilots, it is always legendary and reliable.
  11. vylvyn
    +1
    21 February 2012 17: 55
    I understand from the media that our Rook is superior in armament to Svintus. And he has more than enough combat experience. No wonder the "bad guys" hate pilots from Rooks more than anyone else. They will remember forever.