The newest military vehicle Ural-63704-0010 "Tornado-U"

During the International Military-Technical Forum "Army-2015", the first public presentation of the newest military vehicle of increased carrying capacity Ural-63704-0010 "Tornado-U" with a frame-panel cabin was held, reports "Messenger of Mordovia".

The main purpose of the truck is to transport weapons, special and military equipment, trailers of various types, as well as personnel.

Below are its specifications:

Gross weight about 30 t.
Load capacity - 16 t.
Trailer towing weight - 12 t.
Diesel engine, in-line, six-cylinder, multi-fuel, hp power 440
Maximum speed - at least 100 km / h.
Ground clearance 400 mm.
Overcoming obstacles: lifting - no less than 60%, ford - with a depth of 1,8 m.
Cruising about 1000 km.

“Transmission: manual transmission, two-stage transfer case with axle locking differential. Drive axles with central and wheel gearboxes, middle and rear axles with locking cross-axle differentials, with axle locking on the middle axle, "- said the publication.

The car received dependent spring suspension and dual-circuit brake system with pneumatic drive and ABS.

One of the distinguishing features of the new truck is the construction of a three-seater cab - “it is a bonnet, frame-panel, three-seater, with the possibility of installing a KDW”, the publication notes. There are air conditioning, heating and ventilation systems.

Comments

[RUSS]

Where is the armor?

[NO PASARAN]

Quote: RUSS

Where is the armor?

The armor, apparently, will appear on other modifications.

[st25310]

Good for everyone! But the grille could not be made vertical.

[ty60]

It’s more convenient in winter. With a muzzle it’s easier.

[Stalker.1977]

Too heavy or it seems to me ??? And so the machine is healthy.

[Nick]

Quote: Stalker.1977

Too heavy or it seems to me ??? And so the machine is healthy.

30 tons is the mass with cargo, and without cargo the weight of the car is only 14 tons.
Another thing surprises me. For the first time I hear that a truck should overcome a rise in 60 degrees, most likely a typo. 30-35 degrees maximum

[Arh]

As I understand it, the new Urals will replace the old Urals, but they will look at the place to reserve or not !!!

[wanderer_032]

Quote: Arh

As I understand it, the new Urals will replace the old Urals, but they will look at the place to reserve or not !!!

This is not a new "Ural", it is a deep modification of the 4320 family.
The most "feature" of the new type of armored cabin.

[enot73]

Quote: NO PASARAN

Where is the armor?

Quote: NO PASARAN

The armor, apparently, will appear on other modifications.

IMHO This car has a fully armored cab

[vkl-47]

This is a transport machine. For transporting goods, first of all, not people.

[RUSS]

Quote: vkl-47

This is a transport machine. For transporting goods, first of all, not people.

The article also writes about the transportation of personnel.

[Nick]

Quote: RUSS

Where is the armor?

The armor on Typhoon, and this is Tornado, is just an 6X6 army truck. By the way, the article states that the cabin can be protected by a complex of dynamic protection (KDZ).

[Prapor-527]

Quote: RUSS

Where is the armor?

On Typhoons ...

[Mark Alekseevich]

Today I visited the Army-2015 forum in the Patriot park. In short, it seemed to me even cooler than MAKS and Technologies in Mechanical Engineering combined!

Read more here ...

http://sdelanounas.ru/blogs/63929/

[Maks7877]

The Typhoons have armor.

[wanderer_032]

Quote: RUSS

Where is the armor?

Are you not seeing well enough?
This "Ural" has an armored cabin with bulletproof glass.

[RUSS]

Quote: wanderer_032

Quote: RUSS

Where is the armor?

Are you not seeing well enough?
This "Ural" has an armored cabin with bulletproof glass.

Suppose, what about the protection of transported personnel?

[wanderer_032]

Quote: RUSS

Suppose, what about the protection of transported personnel?

Have you read the note carefully?

The main purpose of the truck is to transport weapons, special and military equipment, trailers of various types, as well as personnel.

That is, this car is primarily intended for the carriage of goods.
Transportation of people is provided as an additional option (on folding benches installed along the sides), and not the main one.

[constantin.kiselev2014]

look at you tube!

[prabiz]

Everything's OK! When in operation?

[ohotnik101]

On this and we will end the war! (c) I.V. Stalin.

[Mama_Cholli]

Quote: ohotnik101

On this and we will end the war! (c) I.V. Stalin.

I would like it to be on turbulent pepelats ....

[Nick]

Quote: Mama_Cholli

Quote: ohotnik101

On this and we will end the war! (c) I.V. Stalin.

I would like it to be on turbulent pepelats ....

for all pepelats gravitsap is not enough

[chebman]

Finally, they put a normal monolithic glass, and not a refracting squalor of two halves!

[Midshipman]

Yes, how to say. Reliability is half as much (passenger shot, but the driver can still see), the repair price is twice as high.

[chebman]

Once again: it’s not about the central pillar, but about the breaking of the glass in the area of ​​the front pillar.

[chebman]

A military truck with a cab from the Gazelle Next is, of course, one more sight! Especially tilted glass, like a motorcycle.

[koosss]

saving...

[wanderer_032]

Quote: chebman

A military truck with a cab from the Gazelle Next is, of course, one more sight! Especially tilted glass, like a motorcycle.

New "Urals", "Lawns" and "Gazelles" will now be produced with a single cab, they all belong to the "Next" family.
This makes unification possible and reduces the cost of mass production of 3 types of trucks.
Somehow small-tonnage "Gazelle-Next", medium-tonnage "Gazon-Next" ("Sadko-Next") and heavy trucks "Ural-Next".
By the way, the cabin itself is very good in terms of ergonomics. For the driver there are completely human conditions. So far, only a sleeping bag is lacking, but it is likely that modifications of such new generation cabs will appear in the near future.

[UNFAMILIAR]

Two passenger seats in the civilian cabin, unconditional + that the lawn, that of the Urals, the only thing is, anyway, the cabin is not for spending the night. would be useful, and the presented option, for the supply of artillery units on the front line (it will fit more than a "typhoon")

[wanderer_032]

Quote: UNKNOWN

As for "tornado-U", it directly asks for "tornado-G"

I think that the artillerymen will soon receive vehicles based on the Typhoon-U / K.
This is under the installation of MLRS.

This machine is intended for parts and supply units.
Therefore, it is made on an extended base 4320.

[nic086]

Quote: RUSS

Where is the armor?

This is a Tornado truck, not a Tornado armored car! These modifications have different purposes, everything is described in the characteristics, if you read carefully

Gross weight about 30 t.
Load capacity - 16 t.
Trailer towing weight - 12 t.
Diesel engine, in-line, six-cylinder, multi-fuel, hp power 440
Maximum speed - at least 100 km / h.
Ground clearance 400 mm.
Overcoming obstacles: lifting - no less than 60%, ford - with a depth of 1,8 m.
Cruising about 1000 km.

[self-propelled]

Quote: nic086

This is a Tornado truck, not a Tornado armored car!

I will say more - these are not different modifications of one model, but different models! from the general - the engine (perhaps also the gearbox (headlights, instruments and steering wheel are not taken into account)). armored car "Typhoon-U" has independent hydropneumatic suspension of wheels, and this cargo "Tornado-U" stands on continuous axles with leaf spring suspension. apparently "UralAZ" is preparing a replacement for a simple, reliable "old man" "Ural" -4320

[RUSS]

Quote: nic086

Quote: RUSS

Where is the armor?

This is a Tornado truck, not a Tornado armored car! These modifications have different purposes, everything is described in the characteristics, if you read carefully

Gross weight about 30 t.
Load capacity - 16 t.
Trailer towing weight - 12 t.
Diesel engine, in-line, six-cylinder, multi-fuel, hp power 440
Maximum speed - at least 100 km / h.
Ground clearance 400 mm.
Overcoming obstacles: lifting - no less than 60%, ford - with a depth of 1,8 m.
Cruising about 1000 km.

I understand the difference between an armored car and a truck, but if, as I understand it from the article, they want to transport people on a truck, can it still transport people on an armored car, and send the truck to the village?

[Banson]

Quote: chebman

Finally, they put a normal monolithic glass, and not a refracting squalor of two halves!

What's the difference?

[chebman]

I did not mean the central pillar, but the gap between the main glass and the side curvature.
The difference is that monolithic glass is cheaper to manufacture, well, the range of spare parts is reduced. And aesthetics should not be alien to military equipment.

[Corcap]

Quote: chebman

I did not mean the central pillar, but the gap between the main glass and the side curvature.
The difference is that monolithic glass is cheaper to manufacture, well, the range of spare parts is reduced. And aesthetics should not be alien to military equipment.

Do you think that there is no aesthetics in this? And I would call the "old" "Ural" brutal and aesthetic ...

[chebman]

Do you generally read the text or just look at the pictures? The dispute is not about the brutality of the Urals, but about glass.
Look at the ZIL-130, here is the approach of designers who love their offspring. Monolithic glass, without a gap in the front pillar.

[Vladimir57]

But ZIL-131 had separate windows. If stones, fragments, etc. hit, he had a chance to stay in one half.

[RUSS]

Quote: Banson

Quote: chebman

Finally, they put a normal monolithic glass, and not a refracting squalor of two halves!

What's the difference?

Essentially nothing .....

[chebman]

If you do it out, then of course there is no difference. And if you do for people, even the military, then there is a difference. Glass is monolithic in my passenger car, and I care.

[wanderer_032]

Quote: chebman

If you do it out, then of course there is no difference. And if you do for people, even the military, then there is a difference. Glass is monolithic in my passenger car, and I care.

Really what are you hooked to this rack?

On my UAZ-469, the glass costs two halves and this does not bother me at all.
Comrades told you that it is better for military vehicles.
In the Soviet design bureaus, they did not go far .. they were, besides, the installation of such windshields was a military requirement.

[Corcap]

Quote: chebman

Glass is monolithic in my passenger car, and I care.

Marker, "rack", draw. Moreover, in a convenient place for you ...

[Corcap]

Quote: chebman

Glass is monolithic in my passenger car, and I care.

Marker, "rack", draw. Moreover, in a convenient place for you ...

[wanderer_032]

Quote: Banson

Quote: chebman

Finally, they put a normal monolithic glass, and not a refracting squalor of two halves!

What's the difference?

You would also give "Studebaker US-6" as an example.

The old man "Truman" (ZIL-157) who is in the photo, a 50x / 60x car. But it was painfully good and therefore it was produced right up to 1994. By the way, on the latest modifications there was a power steering r / y and something else was changed.

[Bugor]

And why so many different equipment? How to serve it? Isn't it easier to take the Urals as a base and sculpt everything on it? How is it for strategists - Minsk?

[Alexey RA]

Quote: Bugor

And why so many different equipment? How to serve it? Isn't it easier to take the Urals as a base and sculpt everything on it? How is it for strategists - Minsk?

Not easier. If only because "Ural" will not stretch such volumes.
In addition, monopoly, even in Soviet times, was fraught with bronzing of the plant and sharp attacks of deafness and blindness that hit the plant and the design bureau at the sight of complaints from the Ministry of Defense. One of the closest examples is "Tiger", which began to be brought to mind only after the furniture maker made a decision on IVECO.

By the way, on "primers" now they are trying to get away from the MZKT.

[chebman]

This is the Ural, and on its basis this modification was "molded".

[31rus]

Dear, it seems that I got into the future, I do not have time to digest so much new

[Metlik]

At first I thought they did a modification of the RSZO tornado. Why give the same name?

[341712]

Quote: Metlik

Metlik Today, 12: 09
At first I thought they did a modification of the RSZO tornado. Why give the same name?

This is for vragoFF)))))

[Abbra]

Well, very good! So take this guy as the basis for all kinds of military traffic. The techies just say thanks.

[STALK1974]

I am glad that the brakes are purely pneumatic, and then they already got tired of combined brakes (pneumatic hydraulics).

[K-50]

It is strange that the windshield is panoramic. Typically, for military vehicles and dual-use, separate windshields are used, so that both halves are the same. This is done so that in case of damage to the glass on the half of the driver, it is possible to replace it with the next half, making it easier to control during the march.

[STALK1974]

And what about the ZIL-131, there you can’t replace the halves with all the desire.

[Havoc]

Has the new Ural preserved that legendary patency of the old model?

[st25310]

It also increased.

[torp]

Started to fly?

[ivan bogomolov]

Future hard worker with a good past.

[biron]

They know how to do when they want.

[511]

The Urals remained in their place, and this car will finally replace the Kraz Khokhlyatsky. Let them ride that oak themselves.

[cth; fyn]

Oak? Ek in you hatred boils that call such a beautiful car oak.

[RED_ICE]

Nothing new.

[RED_ICE]

Nothing new.

[sagitch]

Characteristics are impressive! Finally, a pneumatic brake system, carrying capacity on all-terrain tires 16 tons? Wow! Now, if the sound insulation in the cabin is decent, then only respect and respect!

[pv1005]

Finally, the air brake system

Which, what? Pneumatic brake.
The brake system with a pneumatic drive will be more correct.
"Learn materiel, they beat hard for ignorance"

[NEXUS]

A wonderful truck. And the carrying capacity in 16 tons also inspires respect. The question is in cross-country ability. If this Tornado in cross-country ability is not inferior to its passenger armored counterparts, all that’s left is to wish it rather to the series and send it to the troops.

[enGhast]

Something ours has recently shown so much new.

[Zomanus]

Well, we hope that for the citizen will release an option. It is possible without booking. And what about field maintainability? The pubic glazing and the radiator grill can be changed if desired by the designers. And yes, it’s time for us to replace the old MAZs and KrAZs already.

[31R-US]

A beautiful car with this is not ashamed to drain a couple of liters of salary

[cth; fyn]

Serdyukov are you this?

[pirate]

Great car

[52]

Everyone praises and rejoices. And what will he be in the series? But, one thing pleases, it looks like there will be a series! And the design will probably be changed, because the machine is not fully serial, remember the first Urals and the series, the first T-34 and serial cars, and so on. If only UralAZ didn’t "chirp in gachi"! We hope the car will take "its place in the sun"!

[cth; fyn]

A book not on the cover is judged. So with the machines, it is necessary to judge by the performance characteristics, and according to them, the next is very good.

[War and Peace]

Quote: cth; fyn

A book not on the cover is judged. So with the machines, it is necessary to judge by the performance characteristics, and according to them, the next is very good.

Well? Compared with the old Urals, this NEXT has no advantages, as usual, only for upward prices, the cabin is somehow trimmed, this impression was saved on jelly, many of our spare parts are not a step forward ...

[Heimdall]

Quote: RUSS

Where is the armor?

on the tank!