"Hawker Hurricane"

58


11 February 1938 on the front pages of British newspapers enthusiastically reported that the day before one of the Hawker fighters, Hurricane, which was piloted by J.W. Gillan, covered 526 km in 48 minutes at an average speed of 658 km /hour. This was the beginning of the glorious career of Hurricane, which was among the most famous fighters in the world. It was produced in large series (in total, more than 14500 units were manufactured during the production of aircraft of this family) and participated in battles on all fronts of the Second World War.

In the mid-thirties, the leadership of the Arms Directorate of Great Britain set a task for aircraft designers: to create a fighter capable of reaching speeds of 300 miles per hour armed with eight rifle-caliber machine guns (F.5 / 34 specification). By the fall of 1934, the chief designer of the Hawker firm (known as Sopwich since the days of the First World War), Sydney Kamm, presented the design of such a fighter.

The project was studied in detail by leading experts of the National Physical Laboratory and received a positive assessment. However, on September 4, 1934, the Ministry aviation developed a new specification, designated "F.36 / 34 Single-seat high-speed monoplane fighter." The company finalized its project, and on February 18, 1935, an agreement was signed on the construction of an experimental machine, which received serial number K 5083.

"Hawker Hurricane"


Six weeks later, the prototype was ready. Without weapons. The Rolls-Royce P.V.12 aircraft engine (later received the designation “Merlin C”) did not pass certification. Only in August, they received a certificate for the 50-hour engine operation, which they installed on the aircraft.

The basis of the fuselage design was a box-shaped truss, assembled from round tubes, with internal wire reinforcement. To give the necessary contours in the rear fuselage on the farm was installed 11 plywood frames, connected by wooden stringers. The nose of the fuselage was sheathed with aluminum sheet, and the rear canvas. The wings were also trimmed with linen. The machine had a two-bladed wooden propeller fixed pitch. The plane flew the pilot George Bulman 6 November 1935 of the year. When testing, the car showed the speed of 506 km / h at the height of 4940 m at 2960 revolutions per minute. He gained the height of 4570 in 5,7 minutes, and 6096 in 8,4 minutes.

However, deficiencies in various systems, including in the engine and chassis, were revealed. After their removal, 3 June 1936 of the year entered into an agreement to supply 600 aircraft, and 27 June the Ministry of Aviation assigned the name "Hurricane" ("Hurricane") to the fighter. Its production was launched at once in two factories. The first production aircraft received a registration number 1547. In December 1937, a nine of the Hurricanes entered service with the 111 th Fighter Squadron of the Royal Air Force.



Serial machines externally did not differ from the prototype. The design of the fuselage remained the same. They were completed 12-cylinder liquid-cooled engine "Merlin" II with a supercharger. On serial aircraft for each pair of cylinders installed one exhaust pipe. The cockpit was separated from the engine by a reinforced fire bulkhead. Behind the pilot's seat was an armored backrest. All aircraft were equipped with radio equipment.

The armament consisted of eight machine guns "Browning" rifle caliber with 334 ammunition cartridge on the barrel. The gates of the machine guns were cocked by means of a pneumatic system. The collimator sight was mounted, but on most airplanes an external front sight was mounted on the hood additionally.

Aircraft improved. Its speed increased to 521 km / h at an altitude of 4982 m and 408 km / h from the ground. The normal weight of the machine was 2820 kg, fuel supply 262 kg (350 l), combat radius 684 km. The wing paneling of the wings was later completely replaced by metal.

For 1938, the X. NUMX of Hurricane Mk.220 machines were produced, which staffed ten divisions of the Royal Air Force. New English fighter interested and a number of foreign countries. Yugoslavia was the first to ask Britain to sell modern fighters to it. The British did not refuse. 1 "Hurricanes" Mk.12 from the number of 1 ordered for their Air Force, they allocated to the Yugoslavs. In December 600, the first two aircraft arrived at the new owner. In 1938, the contract was signed for the construction of Hurricanes М.1940 in Yugoslavia, and at the same time at two factories, in Zagreb and Zeman. It was also decided to additionally deliver 1 aircraft from England.

In the autumn of 1938, during his visit to the UK, the Romanian king agreed to supply his country with 12 fighters during the 12 months.

In the same year, the delivery of the Hurricanes Mk.1 to Canada, then the dominion of Britain, began. And in 1939, the production of new fighters was launched in this country (a total of 1451 aircraft was built there).

The government of Persia asked 18 Hurricanes to be sold to it. Consent received, but only two cars hit the customer. In the same year, the Turkish government ordered a tropical version of the 15 “Hurricanes” Mk.1, then it was increased to 28.

Belgium was supplied 20 pieces with the new "Merlin" III. A three-blade propeller of fixed rotations “Rothol” was installed on two airplanes.

The growing demand for Hurricanes forced them to increase their production. A contract was made for another 300 aircraft. New engine "Merlin" III power in 1030 hp with a two-stage supercharger and new three-blade propellers "De Havilland" or "Rothol", the metal skin of the wing raised the rating of this fighter even higher.

Since the beginning of World War II, in addition to Hawker, production of Hurricanes was launched at the Gloucester plant. She was assigned to release the 500 Hurricanes Mk.1.

Since the beginning of the Soviet-Finnish war, Britain sent 12 “Hurricanes” Mk.1 to Finland, some of which were prepared as early as the autumn of 1939 of the year to be sent to Poland. However, these fighters did not have time to war with the Finns. By the time they were ready, the war was over.

Battle baptism "Hurricanes" took in France. The Air Force Expeditionary Force of the United Kingdom initially included two divisions. A little later, their number increased to four.

From 9 April to the end of May - 1940 of the year in battles for France and Norway, the Royal British Air Force lost 949 aircraft, including 477 fighters, 386 of which were Hurricanes.

On 1 June 1940, Britain had first line fighters in service with 905. In July, the “Battle of England” began. In the ten days of July, German aircraft lost 36 bombers, of which the Hurricanes shot down 13. At the same time, the British pilots also destroyed 7 fighters and one scout, losing only their 8. In July, the Hurricane pilots shot down 49 bombers, 12 Me-109 and 14 Me-110, as well as 12 of other aircraft. During this same time, the Hurricane 40 was lost, with two aircraft shooting down their anti-aircraft gunners.



Air battles showed that the Hurricane was inferior to the German Me-109 in speed and vertical maneuverability, and most importantly - in fire power.

Hawker designers decided to put a new 20 1280 engine in the 3000 hp on the plane at 518 revolutions per minute. The upgraded aircraft showed a speed of 4100 km / h at an altitude of 2495 m. The weight of the empty machine was 12 kg. Armament has not changed. The upgraded aircraft received the designation "Hurricane" Mk.IIA. The fighter version was tested with 7,7 3990 caliber 113,4 Browns and XNUMX ammunition. "Hurricanes" with such weapons received the designation Mk.IIV. However, it was still hard to compete with German fighters (machine guns of this caliber did not penetrate the armor of German aircraft). They used the Mk.IIA as night and sea fighters, and the Mk.IIV as fighter-bombers. In the bomber version, under each wing, one bomb weighing XNUMX kg was suspended. The Hurricane fighters were well mastered by industry, and the War Department sought to prolong their lives. But for this it was necessary to strengthen the weapons.

Subsequently, the designers managed to place in the wings four 20-mm guns "Oerlikon" or "British-Hispano". There have been some changes in the equipment of the machine. The aircraft showed the speed of 550 km / h at the height of 6700 m and had a normal weight 3538 kg, the ammunition was 364 projectile. He was given the designation Mk.IIC.



On Hurricanes, Mk.IIB and C began to install photo-guns to record the results of the shooting. Over the years, the serial production has been produced 4711 copies of the Mk.IIC.

Work was also underway to install three-inch rockets under the wing, but this innovation did not take root. For the destruction of armored targets under each wing on one of the modifications installed 40 mm tank gun "Vickers-S". Her ammunition was 16 shells. In addition to two guns, the aircraft was also armed with two 7,7-mm Browning sighting machine guns with an ammunition load of 660 rounds. This "Hurricane" received the designation MK.IID. The first cars of this series appeared at the front in March 1942 in Egypt as part of Division 6.

The latest production model was the Hurricane Mk.IV. This fighter differed from the MKIID model by the presence of armor protection of a number of vital units, as well as by more powerful weapons (the aircraft was able to carry a pair of 227 kg bombs or 8 three-inch missiles). The new modification was equipped with the 24 “Merlin” engine or the 27 “Merlin”, which have the power in 1620 hp. But at the same time, the aircraft practically lost its destructive properties. Normal weight reached 3490 kg, and the speed dropped to 426 km / h. It is not surprising that he did not find wide application. Total 524 made an instance of this modification.

In order to cover the sea convoys, they began to redo a part of the released Hurricanes into the model "Sea Hurricane". They differed only in radio equipment and color. The part of "Sea Hurricanes" was equipped for a one-time launch from the transport ships with the help of a catapult. After completing the task, the pilot had to leave the plane with a parachute or land on the surface of the water near his ship. This is not a good life: badly lacking aircraft carriers. Later on the "Sea Hurricanes" mounted landing hook, which allowed landing on aircraft carriers, including escort. It should be noted that the "Sea Hurricanes" Mk.IIC very successfully solved the problem of repelling attacks by German bombers, who did not have fighter cover. Powerful cannon weapons posed a threat to small craft and ships.

“Sea Hurricanes” from March 1942, began to accompany the convoys going to the Soviet Union. In winter, the 1941 of the year around the 100 of the C.H. Hurricane fighters of the MK.1W were re-equipped with the Merlin engine. Instead of wing machine guns mounted four 20-mm guns. These aircraft received the designation Mk.1С. "Sea Hurricane" Mk.1С developed speed 476 km / h at altitude 4600м.



The British Spitfire, as well as American-made fighters, forced the Hurricanes out of the metropolis. But they continued to be actively used in North Africa, and then, from the end of 1942, and in Indochina.

In the summer of 1943 in Indochina, the 19 divisions fought on the Hurricane Mk.IIV and C. At the end of the 1943, there were 970 "Hurricane", including the 46 Mk.1 of the Indian Air Force. Hurricanes were also used for tactical intelligence. These machines were supplied with a camera.

The Indian Air Force, the British transferred around 300 "Hurricane" of various brands (Mk.IIV, C, XII). 19 "Hurricanes" Mk.1B and Mk.IIC were transferred to Ireland, 14 Mk.IIC to Turkey (in 1942 year) and 10 fighters to Iran, which after the end of the war received an additional 16 "Hurricanes" Mk.IIC.

Delivered to other countries, including the USSR. It was the Hurricanes that were the first Allied combat aircraft delivered to the USSR. It must be said that in the winter of the 1941 of the year, when most of the Hurricanes were sent to the USSR, the Soviet Air Force experienced a tremendous need for modern aircraft. Of course, in comparison with I-15 and similar archaisms, Hurricane was a step forward. But by the beginning of 1942, they were inferior to German cars in all respects. With the saturation of the Soviet air force with new domestic fighters, the lag of the Hurricane became even more pronounced.

Soviet technicians and engineers tried, as best they could, to improve the characteristics of the British aircraft. Many changes in the composition of the armament were carried out in the field conditions of front-line airfields even before the start of the official modernization program. Machine guns "Browning" rifle caliber were replaced with 12,7 machine guns UBC. Guides for PC-82 missiles were installed, sometimes even ShVAK cannons were mounted. It was not uncommon for Hurricane equipment to be four or six PC-82. Improved by our mechanics and booking. In the field, the factory armor of the Hurricane was replaced with armored seats, dismantled with the I-16. In total, according to British data, 20 "Hurricanes" Mk.IIA, 1557 Mk.IIB, 1009 Mk.IIC, 60 Mk.III and 30 Mk.IV. were sent to the Soviet Union.



After the war, the British government, in honor of the 600 anniversary of the conclusion of the treaty with Portugal, transmitted the last 50 "Hurricanes" McIc in tropical design (they were supposed to be used in the Azores). Of them, the Merlin -40 engine was installed on 22. These aircraft were in service with the Portuguese Air Force until 1951.

In addition to British factories, Hurricanes were produced in Canada, in the city of Montreal with the Merlin II and III engines. From November 1940 of the year to April, the 1941 of the Mk.I series with the Packard Merlin 340 was released there. Moreover, the 28 aircraft had eight wing machine guns, and the aircraft with numbers AC320-AC665 were armed with either 684 machine guns or 12 guns. More than 4 aircraft that received the designation of the Mk.Kh and Mk.KhI, corresponded to the Mk.IIV and Mk.IIC with the Merlin 300 engine. One hundred and seven of them were sent to the USSR. The latest model of the Canadian "Hurricane" received the designation Mk.XII. It installed the engine "Packard Merlin" 28. Two modifications were produced: XIIV with machine guns and XIIC with cannon. A total of Canada produced 29 "Hurricane" Mk.480 and more 1 "Hurricane" Mk.X, Mk.XI and Mk.XII.

The Hurricane Fighter was used for various experiments. For example, to increase the flight range of an aircraft, such an option was worked out. The fighter was fastened with a loop of a cable of the required length, which was fastened to the front edge of the wing to the front edge of the wing, and the middle for a special clip located under the fuselage. After climbing, the pilot opened the clamp, and the loop was released. The fighter occupied a position behind the tail of the bomber. From the latter a special cable with a hook was produced. This hook hooked the loop, the bomber added speed, and the fighter pilot jammed the engine and the wind blade propeller. In the event of the appearance of the enemy, the fighter launched the engine and unhooked from the towing vehicle. But this innovation has not gone to a series.



In the 1940 year, attempts were made to put the Hurricane on the float. However, the fighter showed low speed, only 322 km / h.

The British tried to install aircraft engines of other designs on the aircraft. For example, in the midst of the “Battle of England”, in October, a fighter prepared for pilot training was mounted on the 1940 of October, equipped with a cheaper and more technologically advanced Nzpyr Dagger engine. The following year, the Rolls Royce IIA and Hercules motors were installed on two experimental machines. In addition, one of the Yugoslav licensed "Hurricanes" received the engine "Daimler Benz."

In March, the 1942 of the year passed the Hurricane test with a flashlight similar to those used on Spitfire fighters. But it was considered inexpedient to launch it into production, and the use of the Hurricanes as fighter-bombers did not require an improvement in the quality of the flashlight. Especially for Iran in 1945 year built two copies - double "Hurricane". These aircraft were equipped with two cabins. The front cockpit did not have a lantern, and the back had one (the lantern of the type used on the “tests”). Radio equipment was not installed.

Many Soviet aces fought on the Hurricanes. So, for example, 31 of May 1942, the famous pilot Amet-Khan Sultan, leading the battle on Harikkein, spent ammunition, but could not shoot down Ju 88 near Yaroslavl. Then the brave pilot destroyed the enemy with a ram attack. The following month, he shot down two more Messers and one Ju-87 on the North-Western Front. Hero of the Soviet Union S.F. also flew on the Hurricanes. Dolgushin, who shot down five Nazi planes in the English fighter.

Five to seven downed enemy vehicles had many pilots of the 4-IAP in their combat score. Pilot Stepanenko scored seven victories, and all of the downed planes were fighters. During the spring of 1942, the lieutenant of the 48-IAP Yu. Bakharov won seven individual and five group victories during the battles.

But the most productive pilots "Hurricanes" were sailors. Famous ace Boris Safonov destroyed 11 enemy machines. Senior Lieutenant P. Zgibnev and Captain V. Adonkin, who fought on the Northern Front, had victories for 15.



However, our pilots rarely spoke good words about Harikkeyn. The aforementioned Dolgushin wrote: "Hurricane" is an abominable plane. The speed is low, heavy itself ... I shot down five enemy aircraft on this fighter, but for these victories I needed special conditions. ”

However, it should not be forgotten that the Hurricanes helped our army survive the most difficult period of the war. Therefore, this fighter is a piece not only of English, but also of ours. stories.





Sources:
Kotelnikov V. Fighter Hawker "Hurricane" // Aviation and Astronautics. 2007. No.5. C.3-8, 28-32.
Kolesnikov S. Lika "Hurricane" // Wings of the Motherland. 1992. No.12. C. 22-25.
Kondratyev V. "Hurricane" over the battlefield // Model-designer. 1990. No.3 C.17-20.
Danielle J. March. British military aircraft of World War II. M .: AST, 2002. C. 150-158.
58 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +13
    16 June 2015 06: 49
    Thanks to the author, an interesting article. This is the first time I read the information about the Hurricenes, which has been gathered together. Usually in the military historical literature there is a mention of the aircraft, the conclusion that it was weaker than the German and Soviet models and that's it. The article also conducts a full comprehensive analysis of the machine. The fact that "harriken" was not a successful fighter in my opinion no one argues. It was difficult to fight on it, even more difficult to shoot down. But when our air force lost more than 80% of the fleet at the beginning of the war, even the harrikens were badly needed to create a barrier against German bombing and attack. And honor and praise to our aces to the same Dolgushin - who even on these coffins managed to shoot down the Luftwaffe pilots at the beginning of the war.
    1. +1
      16 June 2015 07: 53
      In deep childhood, he read a book about the pilots of the Northern Fleet.
      Recently, the last name Safonov came across, and he remembered his name in the book mentioned, it turns out it was a comezka:
      since June 1941, senior lieutenant B.F. Safonov commanded a squadron of the 72nd Special Infantry Regiment; since October 1941 - in the 78th IAP Northern Fleet; since March 1942 - commanded the 2nd Guards IAP Northern Fleet.
      I remember there it was told about the Hurricanes, I also remember it was said about chocolate in NZ ...
      It's strange ... I can't find this book on the net ... Maybe: "They fought in the Arctic"?
      1. 0
        16 June 2015 09: 44
        According to legend, Sir Boris mastered Hurricane in one day - he just got into the cabin and that’s it.
      2. +5
        16 June 2015 11: 32
        Quote: mirag2
        I can't find this book on the net ... Maybe: "They fought in the Arctic"?

        Or maybe "In the Sky of the Arctic"?
        About twice Hero of the Soviet Union B. F. Safonov.
        Author Khametov M. I.

        A documentary film about Boris Safonov "He loved the sky and the sea."

    2. +5
      16 June 2015 14: 32
      Quote: D-Master
      Thanks to the author, an interesting article.

      I agree, in general, it’s not even bad good But he was once again convinced that the author is poorly versed in aviation weapons:
      Subsequently, the designers managed to place four 20-mm guns "Oerlikon" or "British-Spanish" in the wings.
      Taking into account that the 20-mm air cannon "British Hispano" was a copy of the French "Hispano-Suiza", which in turn was a licensed "Oerlikon FFS" - it turns out "butter - buttered".
  2. +4
    16 June 2015 07: 16
    And "Hurricanes" are theirs - rubbish! "- said Comrade Stalin about the Hawker Hurricane Mk.II fighters
    1. +4
      16 June 2015 10: 48
      That's exactly what Stalin said, “except for“ Harikein, ”we do not need other British fighters.” Therefore, the first Spitfires (fighters) entered the USSR only in the autumn of 42 (via Iran). to understand that although he was a belated "action" of England to switch to monoplane fighters, it was very deliberate - not speed (as in most countries) was put at the forefront, but controllability and measures that contribute to the neglect of the general disadvantages of a monoplane - high landing speed, relatively (for those times) high stall speeds, low corkscrew characteristics. This was due to the fact that - "over the British Empire not when the sun does not go down" - that is, the main fighter should be available to pilots whose qualifications varied significantly, while ease of transition from biplanes. Emphasis was placed on simplicity and ease of maintenance, resulting in a very balanced fighter.
      1. +1
        16 June 2015 23: 48
        Quote: Argon
        came to the USSR only in the fall of 42 (through Iran)

        Actually, they did not give us Spitfires on the post, because the British themselves needed them and were in short supply. In addition, at 42 came "seasoned", which was already openly inferior to the German fighters. As for the "phrase" of Stalin, then perhaps I agree, "Defians" and "Gladiators" we did not need.
        1. +3
          17 June 2015 04: 09
          Yes, more than its LTH "Spitfire" became famous for the fact that they were constantly in short supply. However, the German attack on the USSR gave England a temporary respite, the intensity of battles decreased on all British fronts, in particular, the situation with the defense of the mother country was simplified. This gave Cherchel an excuse to make meaningful statements - "we will help any nation in the fight against fascism ..." - But when it came down to it (and negotiations on the systematic supply of weapons began in August 41) and the figures were announced - 400 "Harikeins" for 6 months. The Minister of Armaments grabbed his head, they simply had nowhere to take them, let's take into account that he had to make up for the losses in the colonies, accumulate a mobilizational reserve. At the same time, he could not refuse, after all, the Prime Minister promised! And then he burst out - "Would General Stalin agree take at least a third of the Spitfires. ”- After specifying that both proposed vehicles have the same engine and armament, Stalin uttered the phrase that I had protested in the previous commentary. Note that at that time the Spitfire was for our special Ialists are a "dark horse", in contrast to the "Ferret". Stalin, obviously, believed (in my opinion, rightly) that the development of two types of machines with the same engines and weapons, but different aerobatic characteristics, would be a rather difficult process for our Air Force, It will take a little more time and effort. He decided to focus on one aircraft. But the ally could not provide the volume we needed with one type of fighter. Subsequently, this very "third part", the British supplied us with American P-40; P-400 aircraft.
      2. 0
        20 June 2015 21: 53
        Quote: Argon
        As for the "Harikane", it should be understood that although it was a belated "action" of England to switch to monoplane fighters, it was very deliberate - not speed (as in most countries), but controllability was put at the fore

        Well, judging by the memoirs with which they did not obey the helms, and were very heavy, I had to put a lot of effort. The aircraft had poor maneuverability and combat speed equal to I-16. The only advantage is a glazed cabin and a walkie-talkie. Everything else is cons.
        And also, judging by the memoirs, he had a very unpleasant feature - the plane could catch fire when a single bullet hit the tail of the fuselage. This has happened repeatedly.
    2. +3
      16 June 2015 16: 48
      Quote: bulat
      And "Hurricanes" are theirs - rubbish! "- said Comrade Stalin about the Hawker Hurricane Mk.II fighters
      The insolvency of the Hurricane against the 109th Messer was quickly understood by the British themselves. Therefore, in the air battles "Battle of Britain", the more advanced "Spitfires" had to resist the fighters of the Germans, and the "Kharitons" (the nickname given to the aircraft by Soviet pilots), meanwhile, dealt with the attack aircraft. In this capacity, even machine-gun versions of the vehicle performed well. "Hurricane", with its battery of machine guns, for example, could easily shoot the crew of an unarmored Do - 17 Z
  3. +5
    16 June 2015 07: 25
    Pterodactyl was such a nickname for pilots.
    1. 0
      16 June 2015 12: 57
      ..... Pterodactyl was such a nickname for pilots. Accelerated slowly ...

      ..... This is because of the constant pitch propeller ... The constant pitch propeller is single-mode .... Based on this, it has maximum thrust - at maximum speed ... And until this speed is reached, the propeller thrust increases gradually ... There is a term for screws "heavy (over-weighted) screw" .... This is just such a case ..... hi
    2. avt
      +3
      16 June 2015 13: 31
      Quote: timyr
      Pterodactyl was such a nickname for pilots.

      I have not heard. About ,, Hamden "-balalaika from our pilots and ,, you are my friend or ,, Hampden" heard. According to the recollections of the pilots, I read that the modified, well, at least four machine guns, with "Emil" is still so and so, but the main thing in it everyone noted - the fuel supply, well, the automobile carburetor is a float, which at the most unnecessary moment could easily stop the fuel supply. In general, it is a machine without modernization potential. That was done before the war and that's all - after the appearance of Friedrich "nothing can be squeezed out of it ..... Although, of course, we can say that Typhoon with Tempest is a modification, , Hurricane. "But this is a clear stretch on the drum of his skin.
      1. +2
        16 June 2015 17: 18
        Marshal G.V. Zimin wrote in his memoirs that “fighting on a“ Hurricane ”is the same as fighting on a pterodactyl,” it loses speed quickly, accelerates slowly, combat can only be carried out in turns, construction and separation is more dense, otherwise they simply did not have time to help. In a dive, it did not accelerate, it hung. The vertical is weak. Because of the small caliber weapons, fire can be conducted from a distance of not more than 30-50 meters.
  4. +1
    16 June 2015 07: 42
    "Hurricane" is like a transitional stage, to more advanced models ... with advantages and disadvantages .. Thank you .. interesting ..
  5. +4
    16 June 2015 07: 44
    Thanks to the author. It was also necessary to mention that the Hurricane was a transitional model, the first British experience in monoplane fighters. Hence the two-bladed propeller in the first modifications, and linen sheathing, and much more, which was typical for a biplane.
  6. +1
    16 June 2015 08: 01
    The "Kharki" were used by the Britons as a strike aircraft (something like an attack aircraft), after the Spitfire Supermarine appeared, and here it has proven itself well, because could carry a significant bomb and missile load for that time and was strong enough.
  7. AUL
    +1
    16 June 2015 08: 20
    The only positive quality of this aircraft that our pilots noted is its good survivability. But as a fighter - junk. Strongly inferior to Messer in all respects. Proved somewhat better in the modification of the attack aircraft.
    1. +4
      16 June 2015 10: 40
      On the other hand, the Pravda newspaper for November 1941 says that Soviet pilots highly appreciate this aircraft and that it "is not inferior to Soviet aircraft." And the photo is given in close-up. As a child, I had among the old things inherited from my ancestors a watercolor of an uncle who died in the war, just with a painted Hurricane and a signature that it is. In the Soviet years, I remember being very surprised at where it came from in the USSR. But years later he found this newspaper and understood where he copied it from.
  8. +6
    16 June 2015 08: 32
    Somehow England
    Russia gave the plane
    clumsy like a cow
    And an awfully quiet move ...
    Although G. Zimin's 485 IAP on Kharitons, near Leningrad, showed itself not bad, just a regiment commander, being a man with a head knowing the shortcomings of the Hurricane, correctly building the regiment's combat work, echeloned the battle formations in height, and as a result, the "plane with cow reflexes" turned out to be a fighter Although in front of them another regiment on the Hurricanes lasted only a week and a half, well, considering that at one time, the British said that the Airacobra was not a fighter at all ...
  9. +7
    16 June 2015 09: 09
    During the Battle of England, many English pilots preferred the Charitons to Spitfire, although even then Spit-I was superior in speed, acceleration, rate of climb, dive speed, time and turn radius, but Hurricane had a wider, more stable landing gear, higher (by a third ) accuracy of fire, somewhat better visibility from the cockpit and flight range. In addition, he entered and exited the turn faster than Spitfire. The reservation, as far as I remember, was also put on Hurricane earlier.
    But then Harik lagged behind Spitfire and Bf-109E forever in his LTH. It remained to be used either as an attack aircraft or in the Far East (where the Ki-43 was also not very fast) or shoved into the Soviet Union.
    1. avt
      +1
      16 June 2015 14: 26
      Quote: sivuch
      But then Harik lagged behind Spitfire and Bf-109E in his LTX forever

      wassat Maybe all the same from "Friedrich" ??? And "Spitfire" he "did not catch up" izvchalno.
      1. 0
        16 June 2015 16: 38
        from Frederick, this is by itself. But from Emily, with their 560km / hour, he also lagged behind.
  10. +2
    16 June 2015 09: 55
    Hurricane is similar to LaGG-3. In terms of speed and maneuverability, it was inferior to Spitfire (Like Lagg Yak) but surpassed it in strength and survivability, and, it seems, also in power of fire. Therefore, in the fight against bombers, he was preferable to Spitfire.

    I read a lot of memoirs of pilots who began the combat path on the Hurricanes. At that time I had the impression that Kharitonov at the beginning of the war in our Air Force was more than Yaks.
    1. +5
      16 June 2015 15: 18
      No, it is not similar to LaGG-3, if we consider its wing loading and the range of working alignments, take into account the profiles used. That its closest "analogue" is the I-180. Unfortunately, not one machine of the "transitional stage" in the USSR has been brought to series was not. In my opinion, this largely explains the fact that, in the opinion of most pilots - "the MiG-3 was difficult to control" - "LaGG-3 loses speed on bends." Despite all its shortcomings, which most of them are stereotypes, "Harikane" was for the Red Army Air Force a milestone machine that taught our pilots how to conduct group combat; this was facilitated by two circumstances - the machine was simple and obedient in piloting, which made it possible to concentrate on the air situation and the second (probably the main thing), the first a fighter in our Air Force that had a really working radio. By the way, the "catch phrase" about "Kharikeins" belongs not to Zimin, but to navigator of the 78th IAP of the Northern Fleet Ilyin (Safonovsky regiment, the first to take these machines from the British) and in the original sounds like this - "Huriken is a wonderful plane. On a dive, it does not accelerate, but on the other hand, it does not lose speed on cobranding" - feel the difference!
  11. +6
    16 June 2015 10: 03
    This is how the Air Marshal G. Zimin characterized the Hurricane in his book "Fighters", and he had fought before on both I 15 and I 153 and I 16 and MiG 3:
    "From this it is clear that, first of all, I was interested in the possibilities of fighting on vertical lines. I understood that in such a battle the Hurricane is weak, but it was necessary to find out exactly how much. It was also necessary to clarify how the strengths of" our "Aircraft, or rather, the best of the weak.
    We conducted all the planned training battles. As a fighter pilot, I did my best in these battles. But with the same success I could, alas, fight the "Aircobra" while riding a pterodactyl. "

    On my own I will add -Your articles "Engineer-technician" are interesting, thanks for them.
  12. +2
    16 June 2015 10: 34
    Quote: sivuch
    During the Battle of England, many English pilots preferred Charitons to Spitfiram. Although even then Spit-I exceeded in speed, acceleration, rate of climb, speed
    The diving speed, time and radius of the turn. But Hurricane had a wider, more stable chassis, higher (by one-third) accuracy of fire, somewhat better visibility from the cockpit and flight range. In addition, he entered and exited the turn faster than Spitfire. I remember, also earlier they started putting on Hurricane.
    But then Harik lagged behind Spitfire and Bf-109E forever in his LTH. It remained to be used either as an attack aircraft or in the Far East (where the Ki-43 was also not very fast) or shoved into the Soviet Union.

    Ki-43 (Ki-43III otsu) in the latest modifications (with new engines and cannon armament 2 * No-5 - 20mm, by the way, not very weak, with an increased long sleeve and with an increased high-explosive action of ammunition) developed a speed of over 600 km per hour and with a rate of climb over 30m / s, in addition, with an almost fantastic horizon. and vertical bends (and a bomb load of 2 * 250kg.) Probably just waiting for the "Kharkiv" to be delivered, so check the Ki-43 modifications with which you are comparing them.
    1. +7
      16 June 2015 14: 16
      You dear, devote less time to online games, and I really do not recommend that you get any information from there. In general, take it as a rule (so as not to be a clown) that even in our age of IT technologies, only a book is a source of knowledge. Your machine existed in nature only in two copies, and there was only one flying machine. By the way, it had far from such brilliant performance characteristics as "dreamed" of the Martyrs from "War Thunder".
      1. -4
        16 June 2015 16: 00
        Most likely this is for you, Argon is recommended to pay attention to good historically similar games.
        The time has come to throw the "stone ax" mentality onto the shelf of history. More subtle tools for delivering information to the masses appear.
        Now it becomes relevant to talk about how the historicity of the same "Hurricane" corresponds to the model in "Wor Thunder". And in such disputes, there is a study of history by the young generation and with the search for the truth of seasoned historians.
        1. +6
          16 June 2015 17: 31
          Dear gladcu2 I'm in the subject, I assure you at the moment in the vastness of the former USSR, there is no game simulator capable of replacing the "safely killed" IL-2 Sturmovik. A conversation about any historicity in the context of "War Thunder" can be conducted by two people and with a specific purpose. This is a doctor and a patient in the emergency room of a psychiatric dispensary, the goal is to make a diagnosis. Recently I read in Confucius - "Health in abstinence. Happiness in children. KNOWLEDGE IN BOOKS." - And a PC is (as it is true, but involuntarily you noticed) is only a means of presenting information.
          1. -4
            16 June 2015 20: 33
            Well, if it weren't for Var Thunder, he wouldn't know about Key 43 at all. So no need to tryndet about "knowledge in books". Knowledge can be gleaned from a lot. There would be a desire!
            And so - he played, became interested, climbed onto Airvar to read, watched a documentary film and so on!
            As for the IL-2, the Gaijins, in fact, continued the work of Maddox. For example released "Il-2 Sturmovik: Winged Predators". Then they moved it online.
            I myself played "IL-2 attack aircraft", the Var Thunder receiver is more than worthy! So don't talk about "diagnoses" here. Just don't play in an arcade!
            1. +4
              16 June 2015 23: 33
              Dear kavad, do you think this state of affairs is normal? Here are some people who can be positioned as "advanced users" (so that you understand) in the field of aviation history, there are engineers for whom aviation is a part of life. this "young log" not ashamed, leaves a comment, the content of which is essentially nonsense. Here they are - "" knowledge "gleaned from a lot of where" -. Nowadays the concept of "educated, well-read person" is replaced by the fact that we (at one time ) called-the tops picked up. The decision of Meddox to sell all the rights of "Gaijin" to you does not fit into a logical framework. "Winged predators" became not even the end of "IL-2 attack aircraft", but an "aspen stake" in its heart. A social phenomenon that unites quite a large contingent of people, transformed into a means of making a profit and died. The transfer of the "engine" to all (at that time existing) gaming platforms "killed" all hopes (and they were then more than real) that the "IL-2 attack aircraft "will become an international eSports discipline. t another question, what is an arcade?
              1. 0
                17 June 2015 08: 58
                what is an arcade

                This is from the series - "I certainly haven't played the game myself, but I don't approve!"
                If you haven’t played Var Thunder, why say that it is worse? Fly on Hurricane and have something to compare ?!
                It is time.
                Two - this is the "youngest log", unlike you, at least writes competently! Knows that spaces are put after punctuation marks.
                Here
                through "Z" is written. Well, typing the word "FORWARD" with two errors is the finish line. You stated that
                KNOWLEDGE IN BOOKS
                Do not write in books
                to rush

                Three. IL-2 was my favorite game in 2001-2004. As they say - swam, we know.
                Well, four -
                the content of which is essentially nonsense
                Does he have one? If you think so, then until a person shows a professor’s diploma, then you and him will not enter into polemics ?!
                Have you built a plane and a half? And Mousov? Moreover, the people know much more about him! For example, I learned about it in my favorite strategy "Blitzkrieg". Is that bad too? I got interested, went to the library, bought a book ... And then another! And a couple more ...
                And now he at least knows about this plane. And maybe he's already reading War in the Air for 2000 - articles about Hayabusu!
          2. +1
            17 June 2015 15: 29
            Dear argon. You have very correctly noticed that books can be read. But behind this fuss, it somehow left your attention that there were films that you can watch.

            And about the rest, you just strangely expressed that you are "in the subject." Probably just by the way I had to.
          3. 0
            17 June 2015 15: 41
            Knowledge and in cave paintings.

            It is necessary to consider all the ways of presenting information.
            1. +1
              17 June 2015 22: 39
              Guys, - "I'm in the subject" - this means that I can answer any of your questions (in terms of gameplay) regarding any of the existing simulator (its Air component). By the way, I never wrote that I did not play "Tundra". The topic of "sims" is not in the context of the article, let's leave it, if you wish, write in a personal. I'm quite pleased that in our "dispute" with kovad, he learned to distinguish horseradish (knowledge) from a finger (information) and recognized the role of books in this process. I fully admit he was right, about my spelling mistakes. It just so happened that half of the school was native Ukrainian (and there is a slightly different approach to spelling), the floor of the school is Russian. That's not there, not there. now by the sixth ten it "jumps out", I type it for five minutes, I check for ten, it doesn’t help! Regarding what I compare with what there is such a subject "Theory and construction of aircraft" is taught in industry universities, of course, we, the year-olds were given it "edge" (this is a specialized discipline for aircraft manufacturers), but the teacher was very "strong".
              1. 0
                18 June 2015 11: 02
                Quote: Argon
                in our "dispute" with kovad, he learned to distinguish horseradish (knowledge) from a finger (information) and recognized the role of books in this process.

                What do you mean! Damn, before the "dispute" I did not distinguish between "horseradish" and "finger"! Thank you for opening my eyes. And I did not recognize the role of books before you either. How did he live before that ...
                By the way, comrade Orgon, I’m kawad.
                Here's another question, what is an arcade?
                There are three game modes in Var Thunder. "Arcade", "realistic" and "simulator". Attentively and thoughtfully, you probably played this game.
                Oh yes, there are tanks there too!
  13. +2
    16 June 2015 11: 42
    Quote: timyr
    Pterodactyl was such a nickname for pilots.

    Marshal Zimin, who was one of the first to master this aircraft (by the way, his regiment achieved impressive results for this aircraft on the Hurricanes), wrote in his memoirs: "To fight on the Hurricane is like fighting a pterodactyl "Unique" in aerodynamic terms, the aircraft does not pick up speed during a dive, and instantly loses on pitching. "
    1. +6
      16 June 2015 14: 11
      When diving, the bulky Hurricane "parachuted", which did not allow it to quickly accelerate. True, he could write as an asset a small turning radius, achieved due to the low load on the wing, which made it possible to fight on horizontal lines. The Hurricane's chassis was designed very poorly. Despite the sufficiently rear alignment, the fighter had a small bonnet angle - only 24 °, taking into account braking (while according to the requirements of the Air Force Research Institute, at least 26,5 ° was needed). It was even less in terms of ammunition and fuel consumption. When landing on the uneven ground of field aerodromes, the risk of skipotting was very high. In this case, first of all, the wooden Rotol screw broke - unlike Soviet metal screws, it was practically impossible to repair it. The Hurricane could also be scooped when taxiing. This fighter had an unpleasant tendency to raise its tail when the engine was running (a similar property was observed in the Soviet "yaks"). To protect the car from trouble, one or two mechanics were often put on the back of the fuselage. Sometimes they did not have time to jump off in time and inevitably rose into the sky. There was such a case among the British - in the 151st wing, one of their Hurricanes was destroyed in this way, and two mechanics were killed and the pilot was wounded. The fighting efficiency of the Hurricanes was also decreasing due to the lack of spare parts. The biggest shortage was wooden propellers. They not only broke when nosing, cracked from bullets, but were also damaged by stones sucked in during takeoff. At times, due to the propellers, up to 50% of the delivered aircraft were "frozen". Ultimately, in March-April 1942, the Soviet Union launched the production of spare blades for Kangli propellers. At times, the Hurricane's loss of combat capability reached appalling levels. In the spring of 1942, due to the lack of a number of parts and assemblies, only two of the 18 Hurricanes of the 488 IAP could take off into the air. And in November 1942 the 122nd IAD, covering Murmansk, out of 69 of its aircraft could count on three combat-ready fighters. While mastering British cars, the Soviet personnel faced the unusual miles, feet and gallons marked on the instrument scales. The "breaking" control knob was also unusual - one had to get used to all this.
  14. -3
    16 June 2015 14: 07
    "Khur" above 6 km was a king and a god, acquired lightness and speed, in contrast to the tanning mass E-3, 4,7. Airframe and engine features.
    1. +2
      16 June 2015 14: 21
      Hawker Hurricane
    2. 0
      16 June 2015 16: 37
      heruv1me, you have confirmations or the model of the plane on which you flew does not correspond to historical characteristics.

      How many did not read books, but for the first time I hear something good about Hurricane.
  15. 0
    16 June 2015 14: 53
    I did not know that there was a 12 machine gun variant.
    The German pilot recalled that something always came from Hurricane, was like a flying watering can.
    1. +4
      16 June 2015 15: 11
      Quote: Denimax
      I did not know that there was a 12 machine gun variant.
  16. +2
    16 June 2015 15: 14
    "Khur" is a paradoxical plane. On the one hand, a typical representative of high-speed piston monoplane fighters of the late 30s. But at the same time, there was almost no modernization resource in it. All his peers successfully modernized and continued to meet the rapidly changing requirements of the war, and Khur "was rolling downhill" ... alas. I do not know exactly what to connect this with, but for all its simplicity, manufacturability in production and relative cheapness, it was not possible to really change the nature of this machine. "a log it is a log is" ...
  17. 0
    16 June 2015 15: 35
    When he first saw Hurricane in the Model Designer, he did not immediately like his appearance. Something cumbersome and awkward, there is no such swiftness in the contours of the hull.
  18. +4
    16 June 2015 15: 38
    In the North, the GSS Senior Lieutenant Alexei KhlObystov, made three rams with one wing, two in one battle. And both times he landed the damaged Hurricane at his airfield. The plane was strong, but our pilot was even stronger.
    1. +3
      16 June 2015 15: 45
      Quote: REZMovec
      And both times he landed the damaged Hurricane at his airfield.

      To clarify, it was a P-40 "Tomahawk" from the 20th Guards IAP. I planted it both times, also inaccurate. Here are the details of the third ram: At the very beginning of the battle, Alexei Stepanovich's car was attacked by a cover fighter. Shells fired from an enemy cannon pierced the engine of the senior lieutenant's car, and the pilot himself was wounded in the arm and leg. But, despite this, he did not withdraw from the battle. Khlobystov, saving his comrade from the attack of the Messer, sent his burning plane into a head-on ram. Again, the attack was successful. Khlobystov himself, already in an almost unconscious state, was thrown through the detached canopy of the cockpit. At the last second, Alexei managed to pull the parachute ring and escaped.
      1. +1
        16 June 2015 16: 03
        I will not argue, I read an article about him in the journal "Aviation and Cosmonautics" in the 70s of the last century, just a boy). The article was titled "Three battering rams with one wing." I remember exactly that I flew a foreign fighter. And since the Hurricanes began their Soviet military path in the Arctic, for some reason it was postponed that A. Khlobystov fought on it.
        1. +2
          16 June 2015 16: 41
          Quote: REZMovec
          And since the Hurricanes began their Soviet military path in the Arctic, for some reason it was postponed that A. Khlobystov fought on it.
          On April 1, 1942, the regiment became the 20th Guards IAP, was reorganized to the new state 015/134, by May 1 passed the Hurricane and, in addition to the existing Tomahawk IIB (AK170, 180, 194, 202, 205, 263, 267, 306, 344, 339, 473, 483) received P-40E (No. 583, 586, 600, 664, 787, 789, 796, 810-814, 823, 824, 843, 849, 860, 1101, 1108).

          The development of the Tomahawk, despite the good aerobatic qualities of the aircraft, was not easy: back in December, two cars were wrecked (AK318 - a fire in the air, AK296 - broke into a tailspin). And the first combat loss in the north was AK295 - it was shot down in 1.2.42 in aerial combat.

          In general, the “Tomahawk” and, like the “Kittyhawk” and the pilots, liked it, especially because of their survivability and range. The strength of its 5-spar wing after an air battle on April 8, 1942 became legendary: on this day, flight commander Lieutenant Alexei Khlobystov rammed German fighters twice in the same battle! In the first “Messerschmitt” on a catch-up course, he chopped off the tail, the second - on the counter-course, part of the wing, both times of the same - right - console. Both Me-109 crashed, and the Tomahawk safely sat down at its airfield and was easily repaired. His pilot, whose doctors didn’t even find scratches, was presented to the rank of the GSS and received a cash payment of 2000 rubles for two destroyed enemy fighters. The third ram, committed by A. Khlobystov on May 14, 1942, ended with a long stay in the hospital: his damaged in the fight “Kittyhawk” No. 812 he sent to the “Messerschmitt”, who tried to finish him off on the opposite course. Accident saved - at impact it was thrown out of the plane ...

          A. Khlobystov fought on the P-40 until the end: on 13.12.43/1134/1167 he was on the Kittyhawk No. XNUMX, together with his partner Lieutenant Kalegaev (No. XNUMX), pursued by a German intelligence officer and were shot down by his gunner over enemy territory. Both pilots did not return to the regiment ...

          Pilots of the 20th Guards IAP fought on the P-40 for the longest time in the Air Force — until the end of 1943, after which they received P-39N Aero Cobras. General results for 1942-43 not preserved, only losses are known: 28 R-40s of different models in 1942 and 26 in 1943, of which 14 were in accidents and catastrophes, 35 were shot down in air battles, 3 by anti-aircraft artillery and 1 was bombed at the airport. Judging by the surviving results of individual battles, the Germans suffered at least no less damage.
  19. +6
    16 June 2015 16: 30
    Much has been written about Hurricane. You can savor its shortcomings as much as you like by comparing it with domestic and German cars, but as Stalin said, repeating the ancient Romans, "he who gives more than twice gives you twice!" Today it is known in what difficult situation our country faced under fascist aggression and Great Britain was the first in Europe to become our ally in the fight against a common enemy. She helped everyone she could. By July 1941, the British Air Force on the continent had 905 fighters, most of which were Hurricanes and Tomahawks, acquired in the United States.

    I hold in my hands the first volume of "Correspondence of the Chairman of the Council of Ministers of the USSR with the Presidents of the USA and the Prime Ministers of Great Britain during the Great Patriotic War of 1941-1945."
    M. Politizdat 1986

    In a message to I.V. Stalin dated July 26.07.1941, 5 (No. 200) it was reported that 9 Tomahawk fighters were dispatched to the USSR, and in message No. 30.08.1941 dated 40/200/8 sent 12 Hurricane fighters with English crews to Murmansk another 1941 such aircraft armed with 440-XNUMX machine guns for the development of pilots and mechanics with them. The total number of Hurricanes by September XNUMX was XNUMX cars.

    In September 1941, Stalin wrote to Churchill about the need to defeat the enemy "to open in 1941 a second front" somewhere in the Balkans or in France and at the same time provide the Soviet Union with a minimum monthly aid of 400 aircraft and 500 tanks (small or medium). "

    On September 13, 1941, in message No. 12, Stalin wrote: “I thank you for the promise of monthly assistance from England with aluminum, airplanes and tanks. I can only welcome that the British government is thinking of providing this assistance not in the order of sale of aircraft, aluminum and tanks, but in the manner of comradely cooperation. "

    Veteran pilots, in conversations with me, said that this plane was inferior to German fighters in speed and rate of climb, dived poorly, had a moody engine and delivered a lot of trouble to mechanics, but was easy to pilot compared to the I-16 and not poorly armed. “There were no others, so it was necessary to fight on this” ....
  20. +1
    16 June 2015 16: 52
    Probably for its time, And this is 1936, not design, but putting into service. It was an excellent aircraft, with excellent weapons. The 500 km / h limit was only recently beaten by the Italians. Messers were just beginning to be tested. And they were armed with only 4 machine guns. The Americans flew on "barrels with wings". Ours on I-16. That high speed can be achieved with less air resistance is just beginning to be explored. A good plane for its time, but little opportunity for modernization, for improvements.
  21. +2
    16 June 2015 19: 07
    Quote: mirag2
    It's strange ... I can't find this book on the net ... Maybe: "They fought in the Arctic"?

    I remember exactly: there was such a book by the Hero of the Soviet Union Kurzenkov "Under us the land and the sea." About the pilots of the North Sea. I read it. Kurzenkov described a lot of his sorties on the Hurricane, and the variant with 12 machine guns. He also mentioned Boris Safonov there.
    It is likely that there were other books.
  22. 0
    16 June 2015 22: 00
    Anatoly Kozhevnikov, SCAC. "Courage starts." I read it three times as a teenager. He was proud of his fellow Krasnoyarsk. In 1942 he fought in the "kharikkein" near Voronezh. Didn't show delight, to put it mildly. But, there is such a fighter available, we will beat the enemy, and do not get down on the jacket to drip.
  23. Alf
    +4
    16 June 2015 22: 42
    There was one thing on Hurricane that our fighters could not boast of in the late 30s and early 40s. There was an excellent radio station on EVERY Hurricane.
    But, in general, a plane of a unique fate, not the best in terms of performance characteristics, bore the brunt of the battle for Britain, and it helped our country to survive in the most difficult period of the war.