Military Review

The production process of the Su-34 fighter

66
The production process of the Su-34 fighter on the basis of the Branch of JSC "Aviation holding company Sukhoi Novosibirsk Aviation Plant named after V.P. Chkalova »








































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































Originator:
http://www.uacrussia.ru/ru/press-center/mediagallery/?photo=5210
66 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. left-wing
    left-wing 15 June 2015 06: 35 New
    0
    But what about shooting prohibited, etc., etc.? :) And the photos themselves are laid out. There, in the distance, the SSJ-100 F1, F5 and F6 compartments are even visible
    1. Geisenberg
      Geisenberg 15 June 2015 10: 39 New
      0
      Quote: links
      But what about shooting prohibited, etc., etc.? :) And the photos themselves are laid out ....


      Don’t worry :) :) :) Those guilty will answer in all severity of the law: D: D: D
    2. countergenesis
      countergenesis 15 June 2015 10: 53 New
      +6
      NAPO factory makes 16-18 planes per year, 200 pieces plan, taking into account already done
      2010 - 4 pcs., 2011 - 6 pcs., 2012 - 10 pcs., 2013 - 14 pcs., 2014 - 18 pcs.
      the plant can still work with these airplanes for 8–9 years, but in general it’s necessary to think that to release it, maybe even something civil, the same ms21 ...
      1. left-wing
        left-wing 15 June 2015 14: 20 New
        +1
        Generally, it is no longer NAPO, the name of "NAZ named after V.P. Chkalov"
        1. aleks 62
          aleks 62 15 June 2015 16: 52 New
          +1
          ..... Actually, it is no longer NAPO, they changed the name "NAZ named after V.P. Chkalov" ....

          ..... And he was Chkalov .... Riveted in due time SU-24 .... hi
        2. Corcap
          Corcap 16 June 2015 04: 44 New
          +2
          Everything was impressive! Especially YOUTH. The aviation industry has a future, the country has it!
      2. aleks 62
        aleks 62 15 June 2015 16: 55 New
        +1
        ..... NAPO plant makes 16-18 planes per year, a plan of 200 pieces ...

        .... Zhidenko .... This is not KNAPO in Komsomolsk ..... And the size of the workshops is not impressive .... lol
        1. ILIA
          ILIA 27 June 2015 06: 25 New
          0
          Zhidenko - the hand-made thing you wanted ... for volumes you need automation ..
    3. Vadim237
      Vadim237 15 June 2015 14: 57 New
      +2
      There is nothing secret in these photographs; documentation with calculations and materials production is not shown there either.
      1. Garay dgonson
        Garay dgonson 15 June 2015 18: 48 New
        0
        Mom Americans have a purposeful sou27 bought, and documentation for it, so there’s no need to keep secret anymore.
    4. prosto_rgb
      prosto_rgb 16 June 2015 03: 28 New
      +1
      Please enlighten what kind of devices.
      Theoretically, I guess, but I would like to hear an explanation of knowledgeable people.
      1. ILIA
        ILIA 27 June 2015 06: 28 New
        0
        on the other side the structure is attached .... some of the "rivets" will put the temporary huts removed ... the clamps are shorter ..
  2. oldav
    oldav 15 June 2015 06: 36 New
    +1
    Interestingly they will ever be exported?
    1. donavi49
      donavi49 15 June 2015 08: 06 New
      +5
      To Algeria, maybe soon.
  3. Aleksiy
    Aleksiy 15 June 2015 07: 09 New
    19
    Most importantly, there is no trace of desolation and the age of the workers is encouraging.
    1. left-wing
      left-wing 15 June 2015 08: 55 New
      +4
      There are really a lot of young people there, but at the same time it’s also a lack of experience, before the staff turnover was crazy, now I don’t know how to deal with it.
    2. Geemini
      Geemini 15 June 2015 09: 37 New
      +4
      Yes, I agree, many young, and even very young. And it pleases.
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. svd-xnumx
      svd-xnumx 15 June 2015 23: 11 New
      +2
      Most importantly, there is no sign of desolation and the age of the workers is encouraging
      Yes, the newspapers in the West have recently been crucified that Putin’s plan to rearm the army will be covered since there are only pensioners left at the military factories, and here there are only a few people of retirement and pre-retirement age.
  4. andrei.yandex
    andrei.yandex 15 June 2015 07: 32 New
    +8
    It is necessary to transfer the CNC machine tool park to the domestic base. The bourgeoisie began to master 3D printing of parts for aviation, at the Tornado in England not long ago they began to test a part made using 3D technology. So there is already a question about the transition to the next level of production.
  5. Alceers
    Alceers 15 June 2015 07: 38 New
    +7
    And since when did he become a fighter from a front-line bomber?
    1. Max otto
      Max otto 15 June 2015 10: 49 New
      +1
      Quote: Alceers
      And since when did he become a fighter from a front-line bomber?

      Apparently because of the information in the public domain: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D1%F3-34
      Su-34 (T-10V product, according to NATO codification: Fullback - Defender) - Russian multifunctional fighter-bomber, also positioned as a front-line bomber [1] [10], equipped with front horizontal tail (PGO), two pilots are placed side by side. Designed for precision-guided missile and bomb strikes, including using nuclear weapons, at land and surface targets at any time of the day.
      According to its combat capabilities, the Su-34 belongs to the generation of 4+ aircraft
      1. FID
        FID 15 June 2015 14: 41 New
        +7
        A fighter-bomber is an invention of Europeans and Americans who have no frontline bombers (F-111, a pleasant exception) ... The second one in the cockpit is not a pilot, in the truest sense of the word, it’s an operator of on-board weapons, controls the plane in extreme cases ...
  6. atos_kin
    atos_kin 15 June 2015 07: 44 New
    +2
    Overkill. Lots of minor repetitions. Full "publicity".
  7. inkass_98
    inkass_98 15 June 2015 07: 55 New
    11
    Thank you for the review.
    But the Su-34 is still not a fighter, but a fighter-bomber with an emphasis on "bomber".
    And the motley clothing of the hard workers is striking - such a concern, and can not provide workers with normal and clean overalls. And some even work in T-shirts and tracksuits, which is not good at all.
    1. bionik
      bionik 15 June 2015 09: 10 New
      +2
      Quote: inkass_98

      And the motley clothing of the hard workers is striking - such a concern, and can not provide workers with normal and clean overalls. And some even work in T-shirts and tracksuits, which is not good at all.

      Recently there was a selection (How to make a Kalashnikov assault rifle), there are also workers who are much more than that.
    2. The point
      The point 15 June 2015 14: 31 New
      +5
      Quote: inkass_98
      And the motley clothing of the hard workers is striking - such a concern, and can not provide workers with normal and clean overalls. And some even work in T-shirts and tracksuits, which is not good at all.

      Among other things, it’s also on the conscience of the worker himself. Some simply do not want to wear a robe or special issued. footwear. At KnAAZ, labor safety is vigilant for this, but all the same there are enough extreme people.
    3. Mavric
      Mavric 16 June 2015 05: 55 New
      +1
      Everything will be, but not all at once;)
    4. Ehanatone
      Ehanatone 15 October 2017 00: 51 New
      -1
      Collection98
      If the work goes, then everything is OK!
  8. Good cat
    Good cat 15 June 2015 08: 07 New
    +4
    good report, only very large, barely screwed))
  9. Professor
    Professor 15 June 2015 08: 14 New
    +2
    Great article. Very informative. good "a plus".

    A spoon of tar:
    Where are the goggles? The bourgeoisie fired for such a violation.



    Where is Rogozin looking? German machines ... How is import substitution?

    And here it is ... wassat
    1. left-wing
      left-wing 15 June 2015 08: 54 New
      +5
      There, to put it mildly, not very much, everything is there but they don’t wear it. As you can see in the photo when working with the crane should be in helmets, and there everything is without helmets. Import substitution? Ha! Yes, there such machines will not be done soon, they are delivered from Germany, Japan
      1. Bombardier
        Bombardier 15 June 2015 09: 14 New
        10
        Yes, in the best Soviet years, for aircraft factories, they bought machines for a rudge hedgehog.


        professor (4) IL Today, 08:14
        Where is Rogozin looking? German machines ... How is import substitution?


        Now for ten years every clever man will sarcastically ask such questions - like he "washed" everyone with his murderous sarcasm and aroused universal respect.
        1. Professor
          Professor 15 June 2015 09: 33 New
          -9
          Quote: Bombardier
          aroused universal respect.

          I didn't give a damn about your respect, but the clowns with "import substitution" are still driving this clown. I would not be surprised if, before their next visit, domestic stickers are pasted on the bourgeois machines. laughing
          1. Bombardier
            Bombardier 15 June 2015 09: 37 New
            +8
            What did you feel so sad with our clowns? Are there no clowns in Israel? Are you worried about all the former fatherland? That's where laughing clownery..
            1. Professor
              Professor 15 June 2015 09: 41 New
              0
              Quote: Bombardier
              What did you feel so sad with our clowns? Are there no clowns in Israel?

              There are of course, but the mashtats are not the same. laughing
              1. silver_roman
                silver_roman 15 June 2015 10: 39 New
                10
                as if the state is not on that scale!
              2. Ehanatone
                Ehanatone 15 October 2017 00: 55 New
                -1
                Professor
                WHAT is so modest about clowns: look in the mirror - you will definitely see one ... wink
          2. Themi30
            Themi30 15 June 2015 10: 37 New
            +7
            What kind of clowning? building airplanes? So that's why you buy planes from the Americans, the construction seems ridiculous to you)) That's right, it’s better to buy gold toilets from the owner and laugh at Ivan the fool, keep it up!
            1. Professor
              Professor 15 June 2015 10: 49 New
              -9
              Quote: TheMi30
              What kind of clowning?

              "import substitution"

              Quote: TheMi30
              So that’s why you buy planes from Americans, you’re building - it seems ridiculous))

              Americans are cheaper

              Quote: TheMi30
              That's right, it is better to buy gold toilets from the owner and laugh at Ivan the Fool, keep it up!

              Do not be so self-critical. By the way, we will not buy planes, we get them for free.
              1. saturn.mmm
                saturn.mmm 15 June 2015 12: 19 New
                +3
                Quote: Professor
                Americans are cheaper

                Quote: TheMi30
                That's right, it is better to buy gold toilets from the owner and laugh at Ivan the Fool, keep it up!
                Do not be so self-critical. By the way, we will not buy planes, we get them for free.

                Is it cheaper or free?
                1. Professor
                  Professor 15 June 2015 12: 47 New
                  +1
                  Quote: saturn.mmm
                  Is it cheaper or free?

                  There is a continuation for free on a scale of cheapness. That is to say, its highest degree. For this, 1000 small services are demanded from Israel "free of charge".
                  1. The point
                    The point 15 June 2015 14: 35 New
                    +2
                    Quote: Professor
                    For this, 1000 small services are demanded from Israel "free of charge".

                    In general, whoever pays the girl dances her.
                    By the way, professor, have you tried to open a mud bath business? I think you have talent.
                  2. saturn.mmm
                    saturn.mmm 16 June 2015 09: 20 New
                    0
                    Quote: Professor
                    For this, 1000 small services are demanded from Israel "free of charge".

                    Everything is complicated in Israel. In your opinion, in the Middle East a big war is really planned and how soon, I do not mean with Israel?
                    1. Professor
                      Professor 16 June 2015 10: 54 New
                      0
                      Quote: saturn.mmm
                      In your opinion, in the Middle East a big war is really planned and how soon, I do not mean with Israel?

                      IMHO not soon. There may be a real war between Iran and the Saudis, but Iran will not rock in the next 10 years. He is still weak.
                      1. saturn.mmm
                        saturn.mmm 16 June 2015 13: 34 New
                        0
                        Quote: Professor
                        IMHO not soon. There may be a real war between Iran and the Saudis, but Iran will not rock in the next 10 years. He is still weak.

                        In Yemen, it’s not calm either, many Saudis do not like, they live too well.
                      2. Scraptor
                        Scraptor 18 June 2015 22: 28 New
                        +1
                        probably they don’t like it because they still live incorrectly in holy places

                        bomb weak Yemen.
                2. The comment was deleted.
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. just exp
          just exp 16 June 2015 00: 47 New
          +1
          Professor, please explain to me the course of your thoughts, otherwise it honestly seems to me that they just hang out there and are not connected in any way.
          tell me, the reaction in which part of your brain made you think that import substitution implies that we will throw out everything foreign?
          1. Professor
            Professor 16 June 2015 06: 57 New
            -1
            Quote: just explo
            that import substitution implies that we will throw out everything foreign

            Hmmm ... Let's think my karoshiy Russian language ... "Import substitution" ... wassat
            Let's take it apart. substitution
            A. Replacement of production and (or) consumption of one product by another, corresponding to the first product in terms of consumer properties and quality parameters.
            B. The performance of duties of one official by another person during the absence of the first ...

            For people like you: replacement of imported domestic !!!

            Well, where is it? lol
  10. Argon
    Argon 15 June 2015 10: 18 New
    +5
    Yes, in general, there is little that has changed since the late 80s. Yes, they saved, but modernized, well done, but the overall impression does not correspond at all to the aircraft building enterprise of the 21st century. An unpleasant aftertaste is caused by the process of assembling the aircraft itself, which, for 15 years as it should have been in the army, or a comparison of the assembled product with what I happened to see when the Su-32FN was assembled (There were composites present.) "a la the working days of workers in the aircraft industry of the USSR in the new 1990," and she told me, "but how did you all ask ... did you manage to do that ???"
    1. Simple
      Simple 15 June 2015 18: 02 New
      +1
      Quote: Argon
      Yes, they did, yes they did, well done, but the overall impression is completely inconsistent with the aircraft building company of the 21 century.



      The production of military aircraft should also function during wartime.
  11. mQn
    mQn 15 June 2015 10: 33 New
    0
    you probably saw the production line for the first time.
  12. saturn.mmm
    saturn.mmm 15 June 2015 11: 20 New
    +1
    Quote: Professor
    And here it is

    You have something wrong with the chronology, it’s obvious that this machine has a hundred years old comment from the bottom of the comment and the German ones are new.
  13. Vadim237
    Vadim237 15 June 2015 14: 59 New
    +1
    German machines and the production of Ka 52 is not only because at the moment they are the best in quality and equipment.
  • Harvest
    Harvest 15 June 2015 09: 24 New
    15
    Oh, nostalgia.

    Almost everything, like 30 years ago on the MiG-29 assembly. The same countersink, riveting. The same pneumatic tool of the Mytishchi plant with coiled blue duct tape hoses. The same quick-fittings, though still not all. Apparently all the same sealant and VK brush. And even the same K-701 as a tractor.
    I am glad that the men HAVE WORK. I envy
    It is depressing that there are no soundproof panels on the walls of the workshops - when riveted, the roar walks around the workshop so that the headphones do not save. Workers with a riveter and pneumatic drill do not have anti-vibration gloves on their hands. Poor - 10 years, or even less, work with pneumatic tools and disability.
    There are almost no cloth and rubber mats and mats, people are roaming right around the car, not crime, of course, but an indicator of the culture of production.
    Very few wooden gratings and floor drains at workplaces, an indicator of the level of concern for the health of workers, all work on concrete.

    And thanks for the selection, as a young man visited.
    1. Roshchin
      Roshchin 15 June 2015 14: 40 New
      +2
      How is the chip removed, because its smallest particles penetrate everywhere? Do not see the vacuum cleaners, or sweep away the brushes?
      1. Harvest
        Harvest 15 June 2015 18: 46 New
        0
        Quote: Grove
        How is the chip removed, because its smallest particles penetrate everywhere?

        With a sweeping brush, then with a vacuum cleaner, in an extreme case and where it is not criminal - blowing with compressed air.
        Quote: Grove
        Vacuum cleaners not visible

        I don’t know how now, but when I came to work at the Plant, I was very surprised to see what was called a vacuum cleaner there
        This is not a vacuum cleaner in the usual sense.
        An inch metal tube 50-70 cm long. From one end there is a cloth bag, and from the other a rubber hose nozzle. In the middle, at an acute angle in the direction of the bag, two tubes of a smaller diameter are welded to which a hose with compressed air is connected.
  • Monastic
    Monastic 15 June 2015 09: 53 New
    +1
    Whatever it was, but the process is ongoing.
  • inspection
    inspection 15 June 2015 10: 39 New
    +3
    Judging by the dryness of the stocks, the positioning of the tool and the assemblers, the assembly school suffered. I did not see a single vacuum cleaner.
    But cans from under canned food and rags on a floor are visible.
    A noticeable disregard for allegedly secondary.
    It characterizes.
    1. The point
      The point 15 June 2015 14: 38 New
      +1
      Yes, you are an idealist. Jars are most likely used as containers, which are always in short supply. At least we have it. A rag ... Then I agree.
    2. Harvest
      Harvest 15 June 2015 18: 52 New
      +1
      Quote: Verification
      Judging by the dryness of the stocks,

      Uh, my friend, you haven’t seen the stocked slipways. Everything is almost new here.

      Quote: Verification
      I did not see a single vacuum cleaner.

      I don’t know how now, but when I came to work at the Plant, I was very surprised to see what was called a vacuum cleaner there
      This is not a vacuum cleaner in the usual sense.

      Quote: Verification
      But cans from under canned food and rags on a floor are visible.
      A noticeable disregard for allegedly secondary.

      Yes you are a perfectionist. laughing And we live in Russia. wink
  • Vladimir
    Vladimir 15 June 2015 10: 52 New
    +2
    Thank you for the photo selection, he once worked at a similar enterprise.
  • Grigorievich
    Grigorievich 15 June 2015 11: 02 New
    0
    At the dawn of his career, he arrived at the aircraft factory in Tbilisi as a student of a fitter. There they assembled the MIG21 pair. The workshop made wings and tail feathers. The thunder was from the hammers. But the most interesting thing was that there was a nook in the workshop where clamshells were assembled and they put me on the conveyor .Worked in three shifts. He withstood the month and quit. That's how I could not become an aircraft builder.
    Comparison with modern is heaven and earth.
  • ehan
    ehan 15 June 2015 11: 16 New
    +3
    It seems that he should be happy, but it doesn’t work ... The artisanal production! Each airplane is produced manually, and there is no talk about any conveyor. The equipment is partly antediluvian, but the fact that everything new is not ours. The hard workers do not even have the same overalls! Compare with photos produced by F-35. Honestly, scary ... God forbid war, we will not be able to quickly increase the pace of production of high-tech weapons. It’s like I’m a patriot, but you can’t turn a blind eye to this!
  • Taoist
    Taoist 15 June 2015 11: 18 New
    +5
    Hmm ... and joyfully and sadly ... on the one hand, nostalgia ... how much he himself spent on such productions at one time ... On the other hand, after all, almost nothing has changed ... but a third of a century has passed .. All the same plazo-template method. All the same hand riveting and fitting.
    Yes, the plane is certainly not auto - you can’t cook it with robots ... but still modern technologies should work more efficiently. How many boards will a plant be able to commission during such a production cycle? What is the equipment production cycle? And the requirements for staff qualifications? I am more than sure that if production capacities alone will double production, then for this simply there will not be enough skilled workers. The old people became extinct - for the most part, young people are not eager for such a job ...

    In general, it’s good that they build, it’s bad that they build a little, for a long time and in the old fashioned way.
    1. saturn.mmm
      saturn.mmm 15 June 2015 13: 06 New
      +2
      Quote: Taoist
      All the same hand riveting and fitting.

      American fighters are also riveting by hand, by and large the assembly is similar, only the Americans are more fit, more than any devices.
      In Russia, the most advanced aircraft equipment plant is Irkut, there are riveter robots and German production lines, it is very difficult to dig something along Komsomolskoye, Novosibirsk is the very last one undergoing technical re-equipment, it has just begun in fact.
      (build F-35 click)
      1. The point
        The point 15 June 2015 14: 39 New
        +2
        Quote: saturn.mmm
        in Komsomolsky it is very difficult to dig something

        In Komsomolsk, it’s almost the same as in the pictures above.
      2. lelikas
        lelikas 15 June 2015 17: 17 New
        +7
        Quote: saturn.mmm
        (build F-35 click)

        Gottspodi - Americans, too, without the same overalls !!! :))))
        1. saturn.mmm
          saturn.mmm 16 June 2015 09: 29 New
          +1
          Quote: lelikas
          Gottspodi - Americans, too, without the same overalls !!! :))))

          Yes, they come across without glasses, they also work with a hammer and a chisel with a file.
        2. Ehanatone
          Ehanatone 15 October 2017 01: 03 New
          -1
          Lalikas
          You got these specials! ...
      3. The comment was deleted.
    2. FID
      FID 15 June 2015 13: 30 New
      +3
      Quote: Taoist
      And the requirements for staff qualifications?

      You will be surprised, but the riveter's henchman holds "support" (emphasis on "o") for the riveter for 3 years before he becomes a riveter himself. The riveter at the aircraft factory is a highly qualified person ...
      1. The point
        The point 15 June 2015 14: 41 New
        +1
        Quote: SSI
        Riveter at an aircraft factory - a person of the highest qualification ...

        Don't tell my slippers. In addition to the riveter, there are many other important specialties. And everyone gets a category, and the amount of work is approximately immediately after the "apprenticeship". Another thing is that no one will give a well-sized piece: neither the master, nor the mentor, nor the partner.
      2. Harvest
        Harvest 15 June 2015 19: 42 New
        0
        Quote: SSI
        You will be surprised, but the riveter's assistant for 3 years has "support" "(emphasis on" o ") from the riveter,

        Well, here, Sergei, "not everything is so simple" Someone will not even be given support in their hands (well, there are such crooked hands), but someone in a year is given not only a riveting hammer but also a personal quality mark.

        Quote: SSI
        The riveter at the aircraft factory is a person of the highest qualification ...

        Alas, it was a very long time ago.
  • Cheget
    Cheget 15 June 2015 12: 29 New
    -1
    yeah ... the publication had the opposite effect. In some places it seems that enthusiasts are assembling a home-made hang-glider in the garage ... Above, a lot has been noted for sure about clothes, tools, a brown bedside table with a printer bought by tender ... And on the stand there is an inscription - "the main discipline"! But the truth is unadorned and everything will fly ... I hope the parachute did not open recently near Voronezh, not because of such assembly technology, but there were other reasons ...
    1. WUA 518
      WUA 518 15 June 2015 18: 48 New
      +2
      Quote: Cheget
      I hope the parachute recently near Voronezh did not open, not because of such assembly technology, but there were other reasons ...

      Vague doubts torment the unopened parachute. We look at the photo, the parachute is clearly visible.
  • Xoyuschka
    Xoyuschka 15 June 2015 13: 47 New
    14
    He worked at this enterprise for a whole year. It was 2008. Worked as a CNC operator. At that time they took just anyone there (they even took me). Shop # 3 was in complete ruin, all the machines are old, people have been working for over 50 years. Mostly they played cards ...) But then they began to invest money significantly. Using the example of workshop No. 3, I can say: they poured a concrete floor into some kind of rubber, inserted new plastic windows and ceilings, replaced almost all the machines with Shiron (Germany) and Haas (USA), recruited young guys with specialized education. Now, it is impossible to get a job even by pull. Previously, titanium was taken out in tons and scrapped, all and sundry, now you can't even stand a puck. Improvements are evident, not the same, of course, as many want, but they are
    1. Timburton
      Timburton 16 June 2015 13: 33 New
      0
      I was in NAPO on a business trip in 2006. Compared to IAP, the technical equipment was lagging, there was no internal intranet, there was 1 computer per design or technology department, and usually the secretary had it. Most of the staff by age was close to retirement. We had the same symptoms on the IAZ in the 90s. Now looking at photographs, the eye and the soul are happy with significant changes in technical and personnel changes, as well as increased production volumes.
  • jurijsv
    jurijsv 15 June 2015 13: 53 New
    +2
    Beautiful plane
  • Romanenko
    Romanenko 15 June 2015 16: 46 New
    0
    A good photo story, of course, it may even be too detailed, but explain this thing to me - lately there’s been some kind of absurdity in the press, then the Su-25 will be called a fighter, then the Su-24 will be an attack aircraft, now there’s an article about assembling a Su-34 fighter, Or am I beguiling something? Still, the exam makes itself felt ???
    I’m not asking such questions for the sake of literacy, on May 8 in Russia-2 there was a video report on the rehearsal of the parade, there I also read interesting captions - Yars-rocket with solid propellant engine.
    Guys, stop squinting!
    Su-24 - a bomber;
    Su-25 - attack aircraft;
    Su-34 - a bomber;
    Su-35 is a fighter.
    Well, do not be confused please ....
    1. Argon
      Argon 15 June 2015 23: 53 New
      +2
      The Su-34 is "officially" a front-line bomber, but in fact an attack aircraft, since only this platform contains a PRNK (on a domestic element base) capable of hitting ANY moving targets in any PMU. Thanks to the ability to use R-77 missiles, the machine (of course with certain restrictions on G) is capable of conducting all types of air combat, which gives reason to some scholars to call her a fighter.
  • ivanovbg
    ivanovbg 15 June 2015 18: 49 New
    +3
    Interesting photos, thanks.
  • Timburton
    Timburton 16 June 2015 13: 19 New
    +3
    Quote: prosto_rgb
    Please enlighten what kind of devices.
    Theoretically, I guess, but I would like to hear an explanation of knowledgeable people.


    These are clamping clamps, play the role of technological bolts, they are only installed and removed instantly.
  • Aleksandr2012
    Aleksandr2012 1 October 2015 22: 56 New
    0
    Quote: Professor
    Great article. Very informative. good "a plus".

    A spoon of tar:
    Where are the goggles? The bourgeoisie fired for such a violation.



    Where is Rogozin looking? German machines ... How is import substitution?

    And here it is ... wassat

    I completely agree!!! Such a responsible production, but what do I see? The cheapest workwear for hard workers, some have an adidas T-shirt. Rasp..sky appearance and neatness. Lack of remedies. Primitive hand tools and assembly technology. Maximum manual assembly. A lot of too young staff.
    1. Ehanatone
      Ehanatone 15 October 2017 01: 10 New
      -1
      Glasses, Glasses - The plane flies! ... yes