Abortion. To give birth or not to give birth? Orthodoxy and national security of the Russian Federation. Article 2
Artificial abortion existed in all countries and at all times. Abortion is a pragmatic social way of economic self-regulation of the composition and size of a family: from a complete and incomplete family to the number of children and their gender in a family. And this sexually hidden side of the economic life of the social cell has always been in the sphere of political control and influence on the part of those in power. For POLITICS is a concentrated expression of the economic interests of a person, a family, societies, nations, nations, states, as well as all kinds of religious and secular transnational corporations.
It should be noted that historically, the Russian Orthodox Church always had not only an ideologically dogmatically “moral” concern for population size, but also a self-serving character. In the Russian Empire, the Russian Orthodox Church was an inveterate serf-hedonist and, along with the landowners, opposed the abolition of serfdom by Alexander II in 1861. Artificial abortion in Orthodoxy by the Council Code was punishable by death for a woman. Peter I made an indulgence and replaced the death penalty with 15 years of hard labor. At the same time, when the Tsar reformer Peter I introduced a per capita tax for peasants to support the Russian army and fleet, maternal and child mortality among peasants increased. And presumably, not only from diseases. For the per capita tax on a peasant family was imposed on all males, starting with newborns, and at the birth of some weather boys, the tax burden for the family became unreasonably bonded. Apparently, the custodians of the outbreak under the pressure of economic circumstances, in order for the family to survive, were forced one way or another to take the sin upon themselves.
In questions of artificial interruption of pregnancy, it is wrong to rely only on religious morality. Morality has always been violated under the pressure of political and economic circumstances and has always had double standards.
For the first time in the world, abortions were resolved in Russia in 1920. And it was not only the liberation of women by the Soviet authorities from possessive atavism on the part of men and the recognition in her of the human rights to decide their own fate - whether to give birth to her or not to give birth. It was the legalization of abortions by the Bolsheviks that allowed them to keep the population from starvation and keep themselves in power in the country. Post-war, post-revolutionary famine and devastation reigned in Russia. Contraceptives were lacking or not at all. The legalization of abortions was a pragmatic means for the authorities to launch a mechanism for self-regulation of demographic indicators in a hungry and cold country, and also contributed to the restoration of industry. It is noteworthy that the preemptive priority for abortions was then provided to women industrial workers before other citizens.
And do not think that the Soviet government has ceased to monitor the state of abortion in the country. Watched. The demand for abortion was greater than in the country was for this doctors. Soon, abortions were banned by the firstbirth (Many women after the first abortion with this medicine remained fruitless.) And this ban was also a way of political and economic management (!) Of the country in the field of demographic regulation. Too large families were not welcome. A mother of many children was not supposed to be only a housewife, and she no longer had enough strength. Therefore, when a certain level of fertility is attained in the country, the maternal load, as it were, began to be redistributed more or less evenly among all Soviet women, involving mothers of primiparas in motherhood.
And in 1936, the resolution of the CEC and the Council of People's Commissars of the USSR on 27 in June banned abortions in the USSR completely, except for cases for medical reasons. This ban was partly a necessary measure - a kind of response to the demonstration of a revanchist policy by Hitler’s Germany to revise the outcome of the First World War. From the year 1933 in the Third Reich, abortions permitted in Germany in the year 1927 were banned because the Nazi regime needed soldiers. Germans, for example, the Nazis even offered simply - that is, without family organization - to give birth to the future German soldier for Fatherland from a purebred Aryan, but they received certain social guarantees from the state: financial assistance, free quality obstetric care and postpartum rewards!
Given the increasing aggressiveness of Germany, to the practice of banning abortions to rapidly increase the population of the country in 1936, i.e. later 3, after Nazi Germany, the leaders of the USSR resorted. Naturally, the true reason for this pre-war “care” of the Soviet authorities was not openly stated in the USSR mass media about the “female maternal purpose” - and, on the contrary, it was issued as a “response” to the supposed “request of the working people”. However, the USSR was not ready to prolong this problem. In the country, not only was the social infrastructure not sufficient: there were not enough maternity hospitals, nurseries, kindergartens, clinics, housing stock, etc. - but even the plans for its increase in the first year were fulfilled only on 17-18%. The maternity hospital was overcrowded, the medical staff was not enough, the quality of obstetric care fell, maternal and infant mortality in childbirth increased, the housing stock began to thicken, and so on. GDP per capita also fell. And so began. "Community-acquired" abortions! And so on for several years to come.
As a result, the effect of an increase in the birth rate from the ban on abortions was short-lived, but the maternal mortality rate increased markedly.
For example. In the USSR as a whole, in 1937, there were NEXTEN (!) 568 thousand abortions, in 1939 year - 723 thousand, in 1940-m - 807 thousand. on average, about 700 thousand per year. Of which the number of so-called. “Outpatient” abortions amounted to about 92%, or even more. Over at least 1,5 million abortion women from 15 to 49 over 4 years before the war were accurately condemned. Maternal mortality and from abortions in cities increased immediately in 2-3 times. (In rural areas, there was no record.) In total, in 1940, the maternal mortality among the urban population was almost 329 per 100 thousand born (for comparison: in 2000 year in Russian cities 35 per 100 thousand born). And at the beginning of the 1950's. this mortality rate exceeded 452 by 100 thousand born. Moreover, these data are incomplete and greatly underestimated due to bribing doctors and officials to conceal the fact of a crime. And the birth rate quickly returned to almost the same level. The number of infanticide has also increased. - http://demoscope.ru/weekly/2005/0221/reprod01.php#_FN_1
In 1945, men returned home from the war - and so on. “Out-of-hospital” abortiveness in the devastated and crippled USSR began with a new force and with results, as in 1940 year. The ban on abortion in the USSR was abolished in the 1955 year, as ineffective, erroneous. In total, only abortion women were convicted in the 1936-1945 years of the order of 3,5 million.
What happened to the newborns? Have they fulfilled their purpose?
Historical Practice has shown that neither Germany since 1933 nor the USSR since 1936 managed to grow new soldiers and workers either by the start of the war on June 22, 1941, or by Victory Day - May 9, 1945. By the end of the war in 1945, German children turned 15 years old (the so-called “Hitler Youth” - which adult fascists threw unproductive and sacred to defend Berlin in the last days of the war); and Soviet children - the biggest 12 years. Moreover, most of these Soviet children in the territory of the USSR occupied by the enemy either died or were stolen on the so-called. work in concentration camps in fascist Germany, etc.
E. Mizulina objects that her abortion bill does not prohibit abortion at all, as it was during the indicated years of the Soviet period, but merely restricts their number in the country by putting the production of abortions out of the free services for CHI - and this is supposedly done “ religious demands of Orthodox believers and supporters of the ROC ". Where did these demands of believers to a secular state come from? And how do modern living conditions of the Russian people differ from the same period of the Soviet era? Do we not come with the adoption of the Mizul abortion bill on the same “rake”, as happened in the 1936 year, but under a different propaganda flag? You can't repeat the historical mistake!
For example, a vivid illustration of the current state of affairs in the Russian Federation in the obstetric aid case in 2013 is a documentary video about Russia “Russian abortions, maternity hospital migrants!”, Published on YouTube in January 2014, http://www.youtube.com/watch? v = Pyup1GmJ828 It tells about the real demographic genocide of the Russian population in the ancient Russian national regions of the Russian Federation, organized by market reformers of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation.
This video tells how in the 2013 year, according to the reforms of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, village-town maternity hospitals across the country are closed down - allegedly because of their economic inefficiency - even despite the protests (!) Of the local Russian population and the women themselves . For example, in the Voronezh region. of the 33 maternity wards, only 8 will end up. In the Rostov region. close 7 maternity hospitals, in Tver 2. In the Yaroslavl region. only since the beginning of 2014, the 7 maternity wards have already been closed. But the promised new specially equipped machines for the transport of pregnant women, none of the women had never seen. The local population publicly calls such a situation GENOCIDE!
Chief doctor of the obstetric-genetic association of Orenburg, D.V. Nefedov in this video bitterly had to admit:
“As the acting chief doctor, I will tell you - I will open my eyes to some things. In fact, everything is much easier than we think. I receive from the state about 20 million rubles a year - I have been given a plan-order. Scary, probably, it sounds, but I was given a plan-order: 20 million rubles a year for me to have an abortion. Well, I do on the Committee ("health" meaning) of the order of 1000 abortions per year. Not me personally, but my hospital. In order to somehow prevent an abortion, I do not get a penny! Because in Russia such conditions are created. It is beneficial for people to have abortions. Health benefits. So long as this system does not change, you probably should not expect any improvement. And there is global statistics: 80% of women who have an abortion, regret it all their lives. This study is conducted in many countries around the world. When I said that the “system” is profitable, I will explain now, so that everyone can understand. I, as an employer, pay salaries to doctors. And if we do not fulfill the plan-order - at the moment for abortions, then I have nothing to pay the doctors salary. That is, in other words, it is beneficial for doctors to have abortions! ”
In other words, the chief doctor of one of the clinics of the city of Orenburg indicates that the state plan-order for abortions in their Russian region is too high! And if at this overstated state order for the production of abortions in the region the necessary number of pregnant women do not need an abortion and go for an abortion of their own accord, then there is a real threat that healthy pregnant women, future moms, will be sent to doctors for abortion with healthy fruits for counterfeit medical indicators. And preventive work to prevent unwanted pregnancies, of course, is not conducted in the region and will not be conducted.
In other words, with the commercialization of state medicine in a market economy in the first place among the officials is profit-making under the guise of "economic efficiency". Therefore, dissatisfied pregnant women who are going to give birth, they are just annoying. For example, the head of health Yaroslavl region. Sergey Vundervald, with disgust, calls them behind the eyes "pregnant aunt".
In terms of the cost of production of medical services, abortions provide higher savings for the state according to the compulsory health insurance: they have lower costs than with obstetric care. The state order for abortions guarantees medical officials the necessary production volumes to maintain the hospitals ’money incomes from compulsory health insurance - without any particular hassle and at a satisfactory level. Everything is built according to the monetarist model of M. Friedman's “shock doctrine of capitalism of catastrophe”, and not according to the Hippocratic Oath! At the same time, the profit of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation from abortions can be increased even more by reducing the “N-th” number of highly paid medical specialists as superfluous. For, firstly, with abortions of such high professionalism and skills as during childbirth, the doctor is not required, and secondly, the birth rate with such “care” about the population decreases. You can even get to the economic insanity - the remaining doctors are generally replaced by foreign labor migrants.
The video well shows that the remoteness of maternity hospitals (due to their mass-scale closure) organized by the authorities from the settlements poses a threat to life for the mother and her child. Which, by the way, contradicts Article 41 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation. Ambulances to come for women in labor do not have time. There was a case when a woman in labor was brought to the maternity hospital by a FIRE machine for this reason! Because of the remoteness of maternity hospitals, pregnant women are simply afraid to give birth! And this is another reason for choosing a pregnant woman, not childbirth, but abortion. And the problem of getting a woman in labor to get into the maternity hospital is the same for all people - both for atheists and for believers. But believers face it more often, due to the presence of a religious ban on artificial interruption of pregnancy.
A similar situation is observed even in such megalopolises as Moscow and St. Petersburg with their inclusion in the OMS system. Since 2012, the number of obstetric special teams has also been reduced here, maternity hospitals are closing. - http://www.regnum.ru/news/polit/1890302.html
As a result, since officials from the secular authorities in the Russian Federation ignore the aspirations of the people in the field of obstetric care in the country, the Russian Orthodox Church was forced to defend the Orthodox, and along with other indigenous people of Russia, representing the second line of national defense against pro-Western passive aggression in the country. Therefore, one should not be surprised at the appearance on the podium in the State Duma of the Russian Federation - the highest legislative body of the SVETSKY (!) State - January 22, 2015 of the Most Holy Patriarch Kirill, with his demand to ban abortions - to everyone in general! In a pinch, in a secular state make them paid.
Well, firstly, it is a kind of warning to all of us for the future. If the clergy come to power, then all abortions for all will be banned in the country - according to the Council Code! (See the beginning of the article.)
And secondly. Did you understand what he proposed for a secular state? Not monetarism in the MLA as the cause of the genocide to remove, but, on the contrary, the genocide itself as a result of monetarism SEND!
TOTAL. In political terms, as they say, - it lived! The bankrupt bourgeois power in a secular state with its Friedmann market reforms according to the monetarist model in health care, like an overripe apple, falls before our very eyes into the hands of a religious structure! And Elena Mizulina is right there with her subservient project and the intention to change the Constitution of the Russian Federation for religion! Yes, in such an atheistically large secular and multi-religious state as the Russian Federation, it is like starting to run around your own log house with burning matches! (To be continued.)
It should be noted that historically, the Russian Orthodox Church always had not only an ideologically dogmatically “moral” concern for population size, but also a self-serving character. In the Russian Empire, the Russian Orthodox Church was an inveterate serf-hedonist and, along with the landowners, opposed the abolition of serfdom by Alexander II in 1861. Artificial abortion in Orthodoxy by the Council Code was punishable by death for a woman. Peter I made an indulgence and replaced the death penalty with 15 years of hard labor. At the same time, when the Tsar reformer Peter I introduced a per capita tax for peasants to support the Russian army and fleet, maternal and child mortality among peasants increased. And presumably, not only from diseases. For the per capita tax on a peasant family was imposed on all males, starting with newborns, and at the birth of some weather boys, the tax burden for the family became unreasonably bonded. Apparently, the custodians of the outbreak under the pressure of economic circumstances, in order for the family to survive, were forced one way or another to take the sin upon themselves.
In questions of artificial interruption of pregnancy, it is wrong to rely only on religious morality. Morality has always been violated under the pressure of political and economic circumstances and has always had double standards.
For the first time in the world, abortions were resolved in Russia in 1920. And it was not only the liberation of women by the Soviet authorities from possessive atavism on the part of men and the recognition in her of the human rights to decide their own fate - whether to give birth to her or not to give birth. It was the legalization of abortions by the Bolsheviks that allowed them to keep the population from starvation and keep themselves in power in the country. Post-war, post-revolutionary famine and devastation reigned in Russia. Contraceptives were lacking or not at all. The legalization of abortions was a pragmatic means for the authorities to launch a mechanism for self-regulation of demographic indicators in a hungry and cold country, and also contributed to the restoration of industry. It is noteworthy that the preemptive priority for abortions was then provided to women industrial workers before other citizens.
And do not think that the Soviet government has ceased to monitor the state of abortion in the country. Watched. The demand for abortion was greater than in the country was for this doctors. Soon, abortions were banned by the firstbirth (Many women after the first abortion with this medicine remained fruitless.) And this ban was also a way of political and economic management (!) Of the country in the field of demographic regulation. Too large families were not welcome. A mother of many children was not supposed to be only a housewife, and she no longer had enough strength. Therefore, when a certain level of fertility is attained in the country, the maternal load, as it were, began to be redistributed more or less evenly among all Soviet women, involving mothers of primiparas in motherhood.
And in 1936, the resolution of the CEC and the Council of People's Commissars of the USSR on 27 in June banned abortions in the USSR completely, except for cases for medical reasons. This ban was partly a necessary measure - a kind of response to the demonstration of a revanchist policy by Hitler’s Germany to revise the outcome of the First World War. From the year 1933 in the Third Reich, abortions permitted in Germany in the year 1927 were banned because the Nazi regime needed soldiers. Germans, for example, the Nazis even offered simply - that is, without family organization - to give birth to the future German soldier for Fatherland from a purebred Aryan, but they received certain social guarantees from the state: financial assistance, free quality obstetric care and postpartum rewards!
Given the increasing aggressiveness of Germany, to the practice of banning abortions to rapidly increase the population of the country in 1936, i.e. later 3, after Nazi Germany, the leaders of the USSR resorted. Naturally, the true reason for this pre-war “care” of the Soviet authorities was not openly stated in the USSR mass media about the “female maternal purpose” - and, on the contrary, it was issued as a “response” to the supposed “request of the working people”. However, the USSR was not ready to prolong this problem. In the country, not only was the social infrastructure not sufficient: there were not enough maternity hospitals, nurseries, kindergartens, clinics, housing stock, etc. - but even the plans for its increase in the first year were fulfilled only on 17-18%. The maternity hospital was overcrowded, the medical staff was not enough, the quality of obstetric care fell, maternal and infant mortality in childbirth increased, the housing stock began to thicken, and so on. GDP per capita also fell. And so began. "Community-acquired" abortions! And so on for several years to come.
As a result, the effect of an increase in the birth rate from the ban on abortions was short-lived, but the maternal mortality rate increased markedly.
For example. In the USSR as a whole, in 1937, there were NEXTEN (!) 568 thousand abortions, in 1939 year - 723 thousand, in 1940-m - 807 thousand. on average, about 700 thousand per year. Of which the number of so-called. “Outpatient” abortions amounted to about 92%, or even more. Over at least 1,5 million abortion women from 15 to 49 over 4 years before the war were accurately condemned. Maternal mortality and from abortions in cities increased immediately in 2-3 times. (In rural areas, there was no record.) In total, in 1940, the maternal mortality among the urban population was almost 329 per 100 thousand born (for comparison: in 2000 year in Russian cities 35 per 100 thousand born). And at the beginning of the 1950's. this mortality rate exceeded 452 by 100 thousand born. Moreover, these data are incomplete and greatly underestimated due to bribing doctors and officials to conceal the fact of a crime. And the birth rate quickly returned to almost the same level. The number of infanticide has also increased. - http://demoscope.ru/weekly/2005/0221/reprod01.php#_FN_1
In 1945, men returned home from the war - and so on. “Out-of-hospital” abortiveness in the devastated and crippled USSR began with a new force and with results, as in 1940 year. The ban on abortion in the USSR was abolished in the 1955 year, as ineffective, erroneous. In total, only abortion women were convicted in the 1936-1945 years of the order of 3,5 million.
What happened to the newborns? Have they fulfilled their purpose?
Historical Practice has shown that neither Germany since 1933 nor the USSR since 1936 managed to grow new soldiers and workers either by the start of the war on June 22, 1941, or by Victory Day - May 9, 1945. By the end of the war in 1945, German children turned 15 years old (the so-called “Hitler Youth” - which adult fascists threw unproductive and sacred to defend Berlin in the last days of the war); and Soviet children - the biggest 12 years. Moreover, most of these Soviet children in the territory of the USSR occupied by the enemy either died or were stolen on the so-called. work in concentration camps in fascist Germany, etc.
E. Mizulina objects that her abortion bill does not prohibit abortion at all, as it was during the indicated years of the Soviet period, but merely restricts their number in the country by putting the production of abortions out of the free services for CHI - and this is supposedly done “ religious demands of Orthodox believers and supporters of the ROC ". Where did these demands of believers to a secular state come from? And how do modern living conditions of the Russian people differ from the same period of the Soviet era? Do we not come with the adoption of the Mizul abortion bill on the same “rake”, as happened in the 1936 year, but under a different propaganda flag? You can't repeat the historical mistake!
For example, a vivid illustration of the current state of affairs in the Russian Federation in the obstetric aid case in 2013 is a documentary video about Russia “Russian abortions, maternity hospital migrants!”, Published on YouTube in January 2014, http://www.youtube.com/watch? v = Pyup1GmJ828 It tells about the real demographic genocide of the Russian population in the ancient Russian national regions of the Russian Federation, organized by market reformers of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation.
This video tells how in the 2013 year, according to the reforms of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, village-town maternity hospitals across the country are closed down - allegedly because of their economic inefficiency - even despite the protests (!) Of the local Russian population and the women themselves . For example, in the Voronezh region. of the 33 maternity wards, only 8 will end up. In the Rostov region. close 7 maternity hospitals, in Tver 2. In the Yaroslavl region. only since the beginning of 2014, the 7 maternity wards have already been closed. But the promised new specially equipped machines for the transport of pregnant women, none of the women had never seen. The local population publicly calls such a situation GENOCIDE!
Chief doctor of the obstetric-genetic association of Orenburg, D.V. Nefedov in this video bitterly had to admit:
“As the acting chief doctor, I will tell you - I will open my eyes to some things. In fact, everything is much easier than we think. I receive from the state about 20 million rubles a year - I have been given a plan-order. Scary, probably, it sounds, but I was given a plan-order: 20 million rubles a year for me to have an abortion. Well, I do on the Committee ("health" meaning) of the order of 1000 abortions per year. Not me personally, but my hospital. In order to somehow prevent an abortion, I do not get a penny! Because in Russia such conditions are created. It is beneficial for people to have abortions. Health benefits. So long as this system does not change, you probably should not expect any improvement. And there is global statistics: 80% of women who have an abortion, regret it all their lives. This study is conducted in many countries around the world. When I said that the “system” is profitable, I will explain now, so that everyone can understand. I, as an employer, pay salaries to doctors. And if we do not fulfill the plan-order - at the moment for abortions, then I have nothing to pay the doctors salary. That is, in other words, it is beneficial for doctors to have abortions! ”
In other words, the chief doctor of one of the clinics of the city of Orenburg indicates that the state plan-order for abortions in their Russian region is too high! And if at this overstated state order for the production of abortions in the region the necessary number of pregnant women do not need an abortion and go for an abortion of their own accord, then there is a real threat that healthy pregnant women, future moms, will be sent to doctors for abortion with healthy fruits for counterfeit medical indicators. And preventive work to prevent unwanted pregnancies, of course, is not conducted in the region and will not be conducted.
In other words, with the commercialization of state medicine in a market economy in the first place among the officials is profit-making under the guise of "economic efficiency". Therefore, dissatisfied pregnant women who are going to give birth, they are just annoying. For example, the head of health Yaroslavl region. Sergey Vundervald, with disgust, calls them behind the eyes "pregnant aunt".
In terms of the cost of production of medical services, abortions provide higher savings for the state according to the compulsory health insurance: they have lower costs than with obstetric care. The state order for abortions guarantees medical officials the necessary production volumes to maintain the hospitals ’money incomes from compulsory health insurance - without any particular hassle and at a satisfactory level. Everything is built according to the monetarist model of M. Friedman's “shock doctrine of capitalism of catastrophe”, and not according to the Hippocratic Oath! At the same time, the profit of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation from abortions can be increased even more by reducing the “N-th” number of highly paid medical specialists as superfluous. For, firstly, with abortions of such high professionalism and skills as during childbirth, the doctor is not required, and secondly, the birth rate with such “care” about the population decreases. You can even get to the economic insanity - the remaining doctors are generally replaced by foreign labor migrants.
The video well shows that the remoteness of maternity hospitals (due to their mass-scale closure) organized by the authorities from the settlements poses a threat to life for the mother and her child. Which, by the way, contradicts Article 41 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation. Ambulances to come for women in labor do not have time. There was a case when a woman in labor was brought to the maternity hospital by a FIRE machine for this reason! Because of the remoteness of maternity hospitals, pregnant women are simply afraid to give birth! And this is another reason for choosing a pregnant woman, not childbirth, but abortion. And the problem of getting a woman in labor to get into the maternity hospital is the same for all people - both for atheists and for believers. But believers face it more often, due to the presence of a religious ban on artificial interruption of pregnancy.
A similar situation is observed even in such megalopolises as Moscow and St. Petersburg with their inclusion in the OMS system. Since 2012, the number of obstetric special teams has also been reduced here, maternity hospitals are closing. - http://www.regnum.ru/news/polit/1890302.html
As a result, since officials from the secular authorities in the Russian Federation ignore the aspirations of the people in the field of obstetric care in the country, the Russian Orthodox Church was forced to defend the Orthodox, and along with other indigenous people of Russia, representing the second line of national defense against pro-Western passive aggression in the country. Therefore, one should not be surprised at the appearance on the podium in the State Duma of the Russian Federation - the highest legislative body of the SVETSKY (!) State - January 22, 2015 of the Most Holy Patriarch Kirill, with his demand to ban abortions - to everyone in general! In a pinch, in a secular state make them paid.
Well, firstly, it is a kind of warning to all of us for the future. If the clergy come to power, then all abortions for all will be banned in the country - according to the Council Code! (See the beginning of the article.)
And secondly. Did you understand what he proposed for a secular state? Not monetarism in the MLA as the cause of the genocide to remove, but, on the contrary, the genocide itself as a result of monetarism SEND!
TOTAL. In political terms, as they say, - it lived! The bankrupt bourgeois power in a secular state with its Friedmann market reforms according to the monetarist model in health care, like an overripe apple, falls before our very eyes into the hands of a religious structure! And Elena Mizulina is right there with her subservient project and the intention to change the Constitution of the Russian Federation for religion! Yes, in such an atheistically large secular and multi-religious state as the Russian Federation, it is like starting to run around your own log house with burning matches! (To be continued.)
7.06.2015
Information