US official: Afghanistan cannot function independently, either militarily or financially

29
The US Inspector General for the reconstruction of Afghanistan criticized the American programs of restoring the Islamic Republic, saying that Afghanistan is not able to function independently either militarily or financially, despite the fact that Washington is investing about 110 billions of dollars in it.

US official: Afghanistan cannot function independently, either militarily or financially


“Both planning and execution were terrible,” Sopko quotes the newspaper "Sight".

First of all, the official drew attention to the lack of personal responsibility for such failures among US officials, as well as to the “terrifying coordination (of actions) between the Pentagon, the US State Department and the Agency for International Development.”

“Do I foresee the stage when we (the USA) will be able to leave (from Afghanistan)?” Maybe. However, it cannot be excluded that this will not happen in my lifetime, ”he stressed.

According to him, Afghanistan is still “facing enormous problems with its budget,” the revenue part of which is “less than 2 billions (dollars).”

“To keep the country afloat, it takes from 8 billion to 10 billion,” said Sopko.

According to the official, if Washington stops helping Kabul, then "the collapse of the (Afghan) government will happen." In addition, he is confident that the Afghans will not be able to "support the military side of the mechanism that functions without our help."
  • flagi.ucoz.ru
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

29 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    10 June 2015 12: 24
    What? Doesn't democracy work?
    Abiiiiiidna!
    1. +6
      10 June 2015 12: 31
      They drove the country into the Stone Age. At the same time, the reason appeared to be engaged in "restoration".
      1. NO PASARAN
        +10
        10 June 2015 12: 37
        USSR built in Afghanistan schools, hospitals, prom. and s.h. objects, people fed and formed, and mattresses for 15 years only control drugs. Ugh ....!
        1. +3
          10 June 2015 12: 44
          If you (the staff) of the USSR didn’t interfere with the construction of infrastructure in Afghanistan EVERYTHING WOULD BE OTHERWISE! Now you are buried in bunkers there and adjusting the aviation fire .. and that’s it! Well poppies is a separate issue ..
        2. 0
          10 June 2015 12: 55

          USSR built in Afghanistan schools, hospitals, prom. and s.h. objects, people fed and formed, and mattresses for 15 years only control drugs.
          The USSR brought in troops in accordance with the agreement and the request of the government (at that time). What do you think is the difference in "meaning"? And the mattresses control
          every fraction of a second, if any, the meaning, “the word is profit?” So, everything is positive, in history! And he remembers this, "peaceful" (to whom the world is not indifferent, and the world remembers) Afghan!
      2. +2
        10 June 2015 12: 40
        Ours were built in Afghanistan, but these only destroyed.
      3. +3
        10 June 2015 12: 50
        Quote: oleg-gr
        They drove the country into the Stone Age.

        And now no one is to blame. request It happened so by itself. But now, in Afghanistan, there is democracy and prosperity.
        And you can sit, crack a fat hot dog and talk about the state system in this country, lamenting and indignant.
        1. 0
          10 June 2015 13: 16
          laughing Why not!
          Quote: NEXUS
          fat hot dog
          "from 8 billion to 10 billion."
        2. Evil Pole
          0
          10 June 2015 14: 19
          Quote: NEXUS
          But now, in Afghanistan, democracy and prosperity.

          Oh yes and the world smile just idyll bully
      4. 0
        10 June 2015 17: 54
        Quote: oleg-gr
        They drove the country into the Stone Age. At the same time, the reason appeared to be engaged in "restoration".

        It never came out, except for the replacement of the Bur-303 rifle with the Kalash and the Pendos rifles. “Due to the high air vacuum, the AK-74 showed completely unsatisfactory dispersion rates. The military was at a loss: why was the costly rearmament necessary? In addition, southerners have a lower pain threshold and the AK-74 was less effective than the AKM. Afghans, who were armed with "Boers", could effectively shoot at a great distance .. They had to use Mosin rifles taken from the warehouses "

        Memories of Afghan Veterans
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +2
      10 June 2015 12: 52
      With ukroina soon will be the same.
      1. +1
        10 June 2015 13: 03
        Afghanistan cannot function independently militarily or financially

        But somehow, before the Brinatians and mattresses existed. laughing
    4. The comment was deleted.
    5. 0
      10 June 2015 13: 09
      Are you kidding! If you iron the country and destroy the infrastructure, it really helps the development of the country.
  2. +5
    10 June 2015 12: 24
    Mlyn, and they existed for more than one century and did not know about it. what
  3. +5
    10 June 2015 12: 29
    US official: Afghanistan cannot function independently, either militarily or financially

    Leave them alone yourself will quickly figure out what and when they need.
  4. +7
    10 June 2015 12: 30
    US official: Afghanistan cannot function independently, either militarily or financially

    How old is the state of Afghanistan and how much is the United States. And these malacholnye will still teach life.
    The waves will swallow the statue with the torch, and Afghanistan will continue to go its own way.
    1. 0
      10 June 2015 13: 21
      If I am not mistaken, at the end of the XNUMXs, there were statistics on Afghanistan, for the well-known history of this state, there were no hostilities on its territory, a ridiculous figure "about five months.
  5. 0
    10 June 2015 12: 30
    How many billions ??? Ukrainians, this is a zrad, definitely. I wish you these grandmothers, right? Avothren! Your American friends will give them back to the Muslims.
    1. +1
      10 June 2015 12: 41
      Quote: RiverVV
      How many billions ??? Ukrainians, this is a zrad, definitely. I wish you these grandmothers, right? Avothren! Your American friends will give them back to the Muslims.


      What billions ???? request They ALL went to the maintenance of "saviors" with their drones crushing civilians (by "mistake" of course)
      Like in Libya, and then they will roll out the bill: either pay, or EVERYTHING that we dig up in your territory is ours !!!
    2. +4
      10 June 2015 12: 50
      Quote: RiverVV
      How many billions ??? Ukrainians, this is a zrad, definitely. I wish you these grandmothers, right? Avothren! Your American friends will give them back to the Muslims.

      Itself saboy .. Afgan people are harsh and independent. (No one could subordinate him yet) .. And in Ukraine there is a war against Russia The USA is worth nothing .. The main promise, well, the Hamers put up a fight and praise Obama! Afghans still since then, the Shuravi remember with a kind word .. They knew how to fight and tried to build something, etc. They felt the difference, as they say .. hi
      1. 0
        10 June 2015 13: 05
        Quote: MIKHAN
        MIKHAN Today, 12:50 ↑
        Quote: RiverVV
        How many billions ??? Ukrainians, this is a zrad, definitely. I wish you these grandmothers, right? Avothren! Your American friends will give them back to the Muslims.


        Meehan, maybe it's not my business, but for which you were so sharply demoted ??? !!! request what
  6. +1
    10 June 2015 12: 31
    Well, how can it be without states, no government can do without instructions from Washington. The Yankees with their megalomania are really enraging.
  7. 0
    10 June 2015 12: 32
    Hmm, STIX. And the Afghans don’t know about it. Well, America wouldn’t say anything, just blurt out. We’ll continue to see.
  8. 0
    10 June 2015 12: 32
    “Do I foresee a stage when we (USA) will be able to leave (from Afghanistan)? Maybe. However, it cannot be ruled out that this will not happen during my life, ”he stressed Is it by chance that this bastard is preparing world opinion to make Afghanistan another state? If yes, I am for both hands. Let them get a share of adrenaline, again in New York. wink
  9. +4
    10 June 2015 12: 33
    A disguised call to stay in Afghanistan forever. It is difficult, it turns out, to part with amers with the proceeds from the sale of heroin. They invested so much effort, the volume of production was raised the way it was, and then a bummer - you need to leave.
  10. -2
    10 June 2015 12: 34
    Divide Afghanistan between Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, China, Pakistan and Iran, who knows, maybe peace will come ....
    1. 0
      10 June 2015 16: 51
      return the monarch from a strong respected clan ... and that's it
  11. +2
    10 June 2015 12: 43
    An interesting statement. It is only necessary to clarify which Afghanistan. For the tribes lived for thousands of years with childbirth before Afghanistan, they will live thousands of years without it. Today, the American Afghanistan, this is the center of Kabul, with its capital in the Green Zone, and the camps in the provinces for which communication must be paid, to the same tribes.
  12. +1
    10 June 2015 12: 49
    Still would. after amerskoy "presence" then ... A common thing for American democracy.
  13. +4
    10 June 2015 12: 53
    Let the lovers of Western values ​​answer ... after the departure of the USSR in Afghanistan, someone built something ???
    Where the United States is investing ... in opium and terrorist training ... they are clearly not going to build schools and hospitals.
  14. +1
    10 June 2015 12: 54
    Indeed, they will not be able ... until the Americans squash their country. Leave, and the people of Afghanistan will deal with their problems. You are already the whole world for .... whether, everywhere your nose is hectic. And when you put it, so there the horror begins. America must be destroyed!
  15. wanderer_032
    +1
    10 June 2015 13: 04
    Afghanistan is unable to function independently, either militarily or financially, despite Washington investing about $ 110 billion in it

    And this is because: "All the gifts of the" exclusive "are plundered by the" exclusive "and exclusively for themselves."
    And the Afghan people act here in the role of a "big-eared frayer" who stands in front of a "thimbler" who strenuously demonstrates to him the "circulation of money in nature" while his accomplices "the big-eared fraer" clean their pockets.



    I twist and twist, nay .. I want. This is what "financial aid" "Western partners" is for the underdeveloped countries of Asia and Africa.
  16. 0
    10 June 2015 13: 06
    But there drugs accumulated for 110 years in advance. This is not good.
  17. 0
    10 June 2015 13: 49
    There is a very simple way for Afghanistan to replenish the treasury.
    Introduce taxes on opium fields.
    That is, to officially legalize.
    For example, they suggested that Colombian drug cartels pay the entire state debt.
  18. +1
    10 June 2015 14: 01
    The most important thing is that American sponsors would not send mujahideen to the southern borders of Russia, because amer’s generosity fireworks usually end and then the attack of a lured beast on Russia begins (this was the case with Japan (1905), and Germany (1941) and Georgia (2008) )
  19. 0
    10 June 2015 15: 35
    Quote: oleg-gr
    They drove the country into the Stone Age. At the same time, the reason appeared to be engaged in "restoration".

    And by and large, they never came out of there, there is now 13 years ... something.
    The USSR came, like the sprouts of civilization brought, and as soon as the shuravi left, everything returned.
    Their bombs do not bombs teach, do not teach one hell they will ride on donkeys, well, they don’t need civilization, even if they crack you, they need a camel, they need a camel and they need a poppy.
    1. 0
      10 June 2015 16: 49
      as in essence in all Arab and in most Muslim countries - there is a supreme ruler / vizier / monarch, etc. he decides everything. and there’s no reason to go there with your charter
  20. 0
    10 June 2015 16: 46
    as anyone, but I really liked the title of the position - "Inspector General of the US government for the reconstruction of Afghanistan" !!! what is it?

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"