A successful launch of a Russian missile defense interceptor missile was launched at the Sary-Shagan test site (Kazakhstan).

91
The Russian Ministry of Defense reports that a test launch of a short-range anti-missile missile, which is one of the elements of the Russian anti-missile defense system, has been carried out. The launch of the antimissile missile was carried out from the Sary-Shagan strategic missile test site (Republic of Kazakhstan). It is reported that the launch site in Kazakhstan was chosen as the launch site, as it is located in a zone that is virtually inaccessible for effective surveillance by American spy satellites.

A successful launch of a Russian missile defense interceptor missile was launched at the Sary-Shagan test site (Kazakhstan).


Official representative Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation:
On Tuesday, 9 June, a joint combat calculation of the Sary-Shagan test site, the Aerospace Defense Forces and industry representatives in 11: 32 Moscow time successfully conducted a test launch of anti-missiles of the short-range Russian anti-missile defense system.

Deputy Commander of the Armed Forces of the East Kazakhstan region, Lieutenant-General Sergei Lobov, while on the test range, said that the rocket had successfully hit the target at the appointed time.

A specific type of rocket is not reported yet, but there are data on some of its characteristics:
the starting weight is 9600 kg, the engine is a solid fuel, the head fairing is made of quartz ceramics.

From this data we can conclude that we are talking about an interceptor missile such as 53Т6. These rockets took up combat duty in 1983 year. They are used to intercept ballistic missiles and their individual blocks at a distance of up to 100 km and at an altitude of up to 30 km.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    91 comment
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +19
      9 June 2015 19: 23
      Keep it up! Air defense / missile defense is the basis of the country's security!
      1. +17
        9 June 2015 19: 42
        The missile successfully hit the target at a set time. Let it be so! For further development, I want to wish: the radius of destruction is increasing, and the time to the goal is decreasing. And one goal - one rocket.
        1. +1
          9 June 2015 22: 38
          Accidentally not from the C-500 rocket tested?
          1. 0
            9 June 2015 23: 56
            Quote: st25310
            Accidentally not from the C-500 rocket tested?

            test launch of short-range missile defense of the Russian missile defense system.
            C-500 seems to be positioned as a long-range missile. hi
            And your "from the S-500" looks like an assumption that it is from her. And in the heat of the moment he struck a minus. feel
            1. +1
              10 June 2015 00: 23
              A note about nothing.
              From any information (OBS) no conclusions can be drawn.
              And we don’t need wink
              1. 0
                10 June 2015 01: 06
                Quote: Lance
                A note about nothing.

                Maybe then it's not worth commenting?
                1. 0
                  10 June 2015 15: 13
                  That's it.. laughing
            2. 0
              10 June 2015 11: 14
              Quote: Manul
              C-500 seems to be positioned as a long-range missile.

              S-500 is not positioned at all like a rocket! it is an anti-aircraft missile system like the s-300, s-400, etc. including launchers, and radars, etc.
              But the complex already includes various missiles, both long-range and medium / near.
          2. +1
            10 June 2015 07: 48
            It is written that the rocket was put on duty in 1983, and the S-500 was not mentioned at that time. In general, a good reserve was in the Union; until now, air defense missiles are working perfectly. good
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. 0
        9 June 2015 19: 43
        Grazing))))
        1. +2
          9 June 2015 22: 22
          And the parameters for height and range? Normal for the current moment or not?
      4. +5
        9 June 2015 20: 12
        Quote: Sukhoy_T-50
        Keep it up! Air defense / missile defense is the basis of the country's security!

        It would be nice to cover such missiles not only in Moscow, but also in other cities. Moreover, the United States has long withdrawn from the treaty on the pro.
      5. +5
        9 June 2015 20: 22
        From these data we can conclude that we are talking about a 53T6 type interceptor missile. These missiles went on combat alert in 1983. They are used to intercept ballistic missiles and their individual blocks at a distance of up to 100 km and at an altitude of up to 30 k

        32 years from the date of production?
        1. +3
          9 June 2015 20: 24
          Quote: Civil
          32 years from the date of production?

          Well now it’s kind of like the A135 system is being upgraded. The upgraded system will be called the A235. Russia needs light interceptor missiles like the SM-3 and THAAD.
          1. +25
            9 June 2015 20: 44
            9-x
            Quote: Lt. air force reserve
            Well now it’s kind of like the A135 system is being upgraded. The upgraded system will be called the A235. Russia needs light interceptor missiles like the SM-3 and THAAD.


            Secretly, SM-3 and THAAD. Cannot be compared in terms of characteristics and effectiveness of destruction with "Gazelle", as they call it. The speed of the product is so huge that it is impossible to see the missile when leaving the silo and keep track of it at the time of flight. There was such a case when in the mid-90s the missile defense was attached to the Strategic Missile Forces and our generals were shown the launch of the Gazelle, they decided that the missile simply did not come out of the mine ... it was impossible to trace the launch with an eye. There was a small scandal. laughing
            On reaction time it still has no analogues in the world.
            1. +15
              9 June 2015 21: 08
              Hell rocket really. It does not look like ordinary ones, but stupidly like a cone.
              According to some reports, the speed of ejection of the silo cover is 0,4 s. At an altitude of 30 km, it climbs in 6 seconds. 1000 engine thrust
              It is clear that this is not entirely accurate data. The design of the rocket is still a secret.
              1. -49
                9 June 2015 21: 37
                pale semblance of an American missile defense
                1. +2
                  9 June 2015 22: 44
                  Which one?
                  1. +2
                    10 June 2015 07: 55
                    A pale semblance of an American missile defense? Or maybe vice versa! Until now, the Americans use their "Patriot", somehow pulled off the S-300, and then only a semblance. fool
                    1. +3
                      10 June 2015 07: 58
                      Quote: Simon
                      A pale semblance of an American missile defense? Or maybe vice versa! Until now, the Americans use their "Patriot", somehow pulled off the S-300, and then only a semblance.

                      "+" for your patriotism! good I’d just like to know what exactly the Americans copied from the S-300 air defense system and which modification they copied?
              2. Shur
                +1
                9 June 2015 22: 19
                Mate -51T6 defeat height 670 km
              3. -1
                10 June 2015 11: 02
                Quote: Wedmak
                Hell rocket really. It does not look like ordinary ones, but stupidly like a cone.
                According to some reports, the speed of ejection of the silo cover is 0,4 s. At an altitude of 30 km, it climbs in 6 seconds. 1000 engine thrust
                It is clear that this is not entirely accurate data. The design of the rocket is still a secret.

                Stupidly or cone, or stupid cone? laughing
            2. -4
              9 June 2015 21: 36
              But the characteristics of Standard-3 are not comparable with the A-135. Altitude up to 280 km, range up to 500 km! Moreover, the Americans have already shot down their emergency satellite at an altitude of 275 km.
              1. Shur
                +5
                9 June 2015 22: 10
                The task is quick, not far. What is the use of standards if you do not respond on time. Different means approaches, and the time of creation.
              2. Shur
                +3
                9 June 2015 22: 19
                Workmate -51T6 lesion height 670 km. The warhead is nuclear. There are two missiles in the system and the year 1978 was created.
                1. +5
                  9 June 2015 23: 05
                  Quote: Shur
                  The warhead is nuclear.


                  Now I’ll reveal a terrible secret .... the warhead has been upgraded in a non-nuclear version ... The Americans are betting on interception in space by the first echelon / or on the OUT if they are deployed in Ukraine /, which is very difficult ... we rely on a guaranteed close interception approximately Kerman lines and below, and here the main criterion is the reaction time and the speed of the anti-missile ...
                  1. +1
                    9 June 2015 23: 08
                    Quote: Ascetic


                    Now I will reveal a terrible secret ...

                    Is there any photo or video image of this complex?
                    1. +5
                      9 June 2015 23: 16
                      Is this this one?
                      A successful test of the Russian missile defense system was conducted at a training ground in Kazakhstan
                      1. +1
                        10 June 2015 01: 52
                        So nimble that I didn’t even have time to light it, but she already jumped off the screen! ... it’s not interesting, BUT NICE!
            3. +6
              9 June 2015 23: 12
              Quote: Ascetic

              Secretly, SM-3 and THAAD. Cannot be compared in terms of characteristics and effectiveness of defeat with the Gazelle,

              Stanislav ....
              Of course "DO NOT GO".
              they have a kinetic lesion (with a bullet in the head of a squirrel), and not shrapnel (or special warheads, the power of which had to be reduced by 2 and times, so that the complex itself would not suffer) in the sector ...
              Which accordingly affects both the entire logistics (weight, dimensions), and the cost of the product itself

              Quote: Ascetic
              There was such a case when in the mid-90s missile defense was attached to the Strategic Missile Forces and our generals were shown the launch of the Gazelle, they decided that the missile simply did not come out of the mine ... it is impossible to trace the launch with an eye


              The generals were clearly under a degree
              1. Do not notice the launch of PR with TTX: Length - 19.8 m, Diameter - 2.57 m, Weight - 45000 kg - and this is almost "Topol-M" ......
              Moreover, on a mixed TT (this is not Н2 + О2)

              need to be eyeless, deaf, or under a degree
              / night /

              / afternoon /

              The carcass is almost the same, the thrust is greater, the exhaust of the combustion products is approximately 3 times larger than the flash.
              2. "Cover" silos from NPO Vympel simply flies out, there is no time, you have to be ... see p1.
              3. Acceleration, albeit large (135-137g), is achieved not INSTANTLY (45 tons of mass), but at an altitude of 500m in my opinion), accordingly, you cannot "notice"

              In principle, here they are.




              NOT noticeable?

              Quote: Ascetic
              .. it is impossible to track the start with an eye

              ?
              With -8 you will see, at a distance of 5 km. EASY
              Quote: Ascetic
              According to the reaction time, it still has no analogues in the world.

              ?
              What is meant?
              125 million operations per second for Elbrus-2?
              or
              the speed of installation units and transport machines TM-112?
              or
              BTsVM 5E28A / "Argon-17A": The number of teams is 132. Addition execution time - 2mks (Oh?) The amount of RAM - 4Kb (RAM?), ROM of programs - 32 Kb (ROM?), Firmware ROM - 24 Kb (Virtual Memory or Cache Lecel 1 / Lecel2?) The number of exchange highways - 8 (Hyper-threading for NetBurst architecture?), exchange rate - up to 160 Kb / s (shink?)

              OR?
              1. Shur
                0
                9 June 2015 23: 19
                You are not writing about that rocket. The ascetic brought "53T6 (PRS-1), according to NATO codification SH-08 / ABM-3A GAZELLE", and you mean 51T6. Here is a more detailed article http://militaryrussia.ru/blog/topic-345.htm
                1. +3
                  9 June 2015 23: 52
                  Quote: Shur
                  You are not writing about that rocket. The ascetic brought "53T6

                  1. Is there a big difference ("did not see") ??? You answered yourself:
                  Quote: Shur
                  The launch is visible of course.


                  "can not see" ? can you "miss"?


                  2. actually it was about:
                  Quote: Ascetic
                  Quote: Lt. air force reserve
                  Well now it’s kind of like a system A135 upgrade. The upgraded system will be called A235. Russia needs light interceptor missiles similar to the SM-3 and THAAD.

                  Secret SM-3 and THAA
                  D


                  System A-135 rocket 51Т6 - ABM-4 GORGON

                  System A-135 Cupid / rocket 53Т6 - ABM-3 GAZELLE
                  1. Shur
                    0
                    11 June 2015 22: 35
                    So I misunderstood. I just read it as it is "The following were included in the system according to the preliminary design (in fact, in the Amur firing complex):
                    - command and computing point 5K80;
                    - data transmission and communication system;
                    - firing complex 5ZH60 as part of the 5N20 "Don-2N" multifunctional radar and 51Zh6 starting positions two echelon missile defense; technical positions of missile preparation. "
                    And further: "Missile missile defense A-925 / 51T6. Development of the transatmospheric missile A-925 began at the Fakel Design Bureau under the general supervision of P.D. Grushin, lead designer V.A. Ermolenko (since 25.09.1991 - General designer V.G. Svetlov) in December 1971, simultaneously with the completion of preliminary projects missile defense system A-135 and shooting complex "Amur"... The preliminary design of the rocket was defended in late 1973 - early 1974. The revised design was adopted in 1976. The final design was adopted in 1978; serial production was carried out at the Avangard MMZ. The first drop launch of the A-925 missile was made at the Sary-Shagan training ground in March 1979. - the first launch as part of the Amur-P complex... Serial production of missiles began at the Moscow machine-building plant "Avangard" in 1980. The delivery of missiles to the Moscow missile defense system A-135 began in 1990 and ended in 1992.
                    51T6 / A-925 antimissile launches as part of the 5Zh60P "Amur-P" complex of the A-135 missile defense system (19 launches were made in total):"
                    Accordingly, I didn’t understand yours:
                    System A-135 rocket 51Т6 - ABM-4 GORGON

                    System A-135 Cupid / rocket 53Т6 - ABM-3 GAZELLE

                    Actually read it like it is:
                    "Creature PRO A-135. After the conclusion of the ABM Treaty (in June 1972) the redesign of the missile defense system and the Amur firing complex has begun for the placement of all funds on an area with a diameter of 100 km, S-225 complexes were excluded from the system, and the missiles created for these complexes - the future 53T6, the design index PRS-1, were included in the near echelon of the A-135 system. The development of the adjusted project was led by A.G. Basistov. The preliminary design of the A-135 system in 1973 was proposed by the USSR Ministry of Defense and with some comments approved at the end of 1973. In the same 1973 A.G. was appointed the chief designer of the A-135 missile defense system. Bassists (from October 202 - Yu.F. Voskoboev).

                    The following options were considered as radars with the PAR system:
                    - Radar "Don-2N" (RTI, chief designer V.K. Sloka),
                    - Radar "Neman" (NIIDAR, chief designer Yu.G. Burlakov),
                    - radar "Istra-2" (NIIRP, chief designer G.V. Kisunko). "
                    1. Shur
                      0
                      11 June 2015 23: 09
                      It turns out the missile defense complex A 135 consisted of:
                      "Radar 5N20" Don-2N "(town of Sofrino near Moscow).
                      32 long-range interceptor missiles (according to other sources - 16 [1]) 51T6 “Azov”, located at two firing complexes (Naro-Fominsk (8PU), Sergiev Posad (8 PU)).
                      68 53T6 short-range interceptor missiles located at five firing complexes (Lytkarino (16 launchers), Skhodnya (16 launchers), Korolev (12 launchers), Vnukovo (12 launchers), Sofrino (12 launchers)).
                      Command and control center 5K80 with the Elbrus computing system (Pushkino, Moscow region) and Zarya, in Balashikha, Moscow region) ".
                      According to the text, it is assumed that the A 135 system initially containing (from the project stage the Amur firing complex with 2 types of anti-ballistic missiles) was such according to the project and when it was accepted for operation.
              2. Shur
                +2
                9 June 2015 23: 34
                The launch is visible of course.
              3. +2
                10 June 2015 02: 46
                Quote: opus
                OR?


                Well, my well-known case ... rocket 53t6 you won’t find it anywhere ... Remember, she worked exclusively against the Pershings in terms of performance characteristics .. Sergeyev was the dead man, the land rest in peace to him, was indignant that I got in ... Esina read the memories ..

                Assessing the capabilities of the created second-generation missile defense system A-135, it can be noted that, given the confirmed correctness of the technical solutions developed in the project of this system, its high performance and combat capabilities, it can protect the capital from the limited strike of the most advanced missiles. A-135 system missiles are capable of intercepting enemy ballistic missiles and their warheads flying at altitudes from 5 km to near space, reaching speeds of up to 7 km / s. I mean, to the Kerman line. The combat capabilities of the A-135 system allow: fend off the threat of a possible low-level nuclear missile strike; raise the threshold for nuclear response; to ensure survivability of top management, including those making decisions on response actions; in a peaceful environment or in the initial period of a nuclear-free conflict, provide accurate information about space objects, as well as the defeat of high-altitude hypersonic targets attacking the city of Moscow.


                If the memory of the Gazelle does not change, there were 68 and 32 51T6 just against the Pershing initially, then in 2006. they were taken out of service and disposed of / Gorgons, I mean /.
                Here’s the real launch of the Gazelle .. You see the rocket al no? So the generals did not see ...
                My webpage

                Well, about Elbrus it’s to Colonel Tagiyev / look on the Internet about him there is infa /, if he still serves, we are orphaned and poor on this topic were not allowed too deeply crying

                For example here

                There are no analogues of our Don-2N radar station in the world, ”says Colonel Ilgar Tagiev. He has been serving at this facility of the Aerospace Defense Forces for 26 years and knows a lot about him.
                In the 80s, the Americans installed their Pershing 2 in Germany and Turkey, adds Colonel Tagiyev. - Their flight time was reduced to 5 - 7 minutes. But they soon became convinced that we and during this time - with a margin! - able to detect and destroy their nuclear warheads. The United States was forced to conclude an agreement with the USSR on medium and short-range missiles.
                1. 0
                  10 June 2015 21: 49
                  Quote: Ascetic
                  you will not find her anywhere ..

                  I can’t find in oi. But something that remains in my head, I remember
                  Maximum range: 80 km (49 mi). Boost Propulsion: Solid rocket. Initial Operational Capability: 1995.
                  AKA: SH-8; ABM-3; 53T6; A-135; Gazelle
                  Status: Active.
                  Gross mass: 10,000 kg (22,000 lb).
                  Height: 10.00 m (32.00 ft).
                  Diameter: 1.00 m (3.20 ft).
                  Span: 1.00 m (3.20 ft).
                  Apogee: 80 km (49 mi).
                  First Launch: 1979.08.01.
                  Last Launch: 2009.10.29.
                  Number: 8.


                  Quote: Ascetic
                  . Remember she worked exclusively against Pershing on TTX


                  Perhaps only than 8 (or 68) Could help against 9 + 108 + 40 + 43 + 40 + 36 MGM-31C Pershing II with a maneuvering miserable warhead?

                  Moreover, in 1989 Pershing2 the end has come ... (operational readiness 53T6 -1995)

                  Yes, and another flight time П2 to 5 - 7 minutes, the time for transmitting data on the target at Don-2, if not mistaken = 9 minutes .....
                  Quote: Ascetic
                  .Rocket see al no?


                  I see, and I would see with my eyes. let alone start "not seeing" you have to be a ram.
                  What's this? PAD bleed?

                  Quote: Ascetic
                  Well, about Elbrus this is to the colonel

                  What for?
                  if I myself was picking with Elbrus.
                  Soon you will be able to (at Elbrus-4С) at the current rate of dss, I order it many on the server and for the cloud
              4. 0
                10 June 2015 04: 29
                And what is wrong? It does not go under Windows, but solves one problem, under its own assembler.
                By the way - the execution time of operations. Long provides protection against interference. There, over the years, they developed and produced many different exotic element bases for such equipment. I still have some kind of injection logic lying around with zero 0 ... -5 and a unit of -15V, I don’t remember the series. I’ll retire - be sure to sleep something :)
                Moreover, in such a time, how long does a rocket fly by? How long is the reaction time? What is the lead time required from the computer? I do not know the speed of the rocket, nor the permissible transverse overloads, but I believe that such a speed of calculation is a margin. With guaranteed noise immunity even from EMR nuclear weapons, not to mention minor tricks.
                1. 0
                  10 June 2015 22: 12
                  Quote: Alien
                  And what is wrong?

                  Aliens, they’re not alright
                  Quote: Alien
                  It does not go under Windows, but solves one problem, under its own assembler.

                  1. What does Windows have to do with it?
                  2. Not in assembler, do not la la if not in the know
                  3. He wrote:
                  4. The entire assembly program for the Luna of the Appalon: 16,2 (or 16,8 kV) and what?
                  Quote: Alien
                  Long provides protection against interference.

                  what nonsense
                  at 137 g on a short shoulder (30-80 km) against an oncoming target (7-9M) "provide a long" you don’t even get into an aircraft carrier(if he goes along the trajectory and with the speed of the warhead BR)
                  Quote: Alien
                  I do not know rocket speed, nor permissible transverse overloads

                  interception height: 30-80 km
                  target speed 7-9 M
                  small-sized target, probably maneuvering maneuvering (such as W85, W-59, W-56, W-62, W-78, W-87), before separation (DON-2 and others) for detecting and issuing Tsu along the trajectory it is maneuvering GC type Mk.5 RV, Mk.11 RV, Mk.12 MIRV, Mk.12A MIRV, Mk.21 RV.
                  reaction time according to DON-2 to 9 minutes
                  HZ interceptor speed (take 3 000m / s), acceleration to 137g, weight 10 tons
                  DO YOU ENOUGH DATA OR STILL NEED?
                  Quote: Alien
                  With guaranteed noise immunity even from EMR nuclear weapons, not to mention minor tricks.

                  What nonsense
                  Industrial / Military
                  -protons, alpha particles and high-energy ions: Silicon-on-sapphire, SOS, in a more general form Silicon-on-insulator, SOI; triple-well process;
                  -Electrons, gamma and X-rays: memory on burned and shorted jumpers - fuse and antifuse
                  -Neutrons + 10B: for the production of microcircuits, only the 11B isotope.
                  In general, on modern persistent technical processes (65nm or less) 1 million radiation-tolerant microcircuits are routinely producedthat exceeds all reasonable durability requirements
                  1. 0
                    12 June 2015 04: 35
                    No, not in the subject.
                    At 3 km / h, during the formation of the team to maneuver, it will pass 000 centimeters, right? Of all one hundred kilometers of inclined range.
                    Next, we consider the transverse overload in degrees / second, and we are surprised how many times it will break without a difference in roll or pitch, when more than a few teams enter the turn. Twists - somehow outlived.
                    At a clock frequency of a few tens of hertz, you cannot get into her brains, because there is nothing to drag nearby a REP antenna of suitable power.
                    Here you have the algorithm of her life, no matter what aliens.
                    Do you have enough?
                    If it’s possible - with a little white bubble, I’m not greedy.
            4. +1
              10 June 2015 04: 03
              This one too went off somehow too quickly, not like the others that she saw. Observation conditions are the same in all cases - in the news. Cinema is always the same, and as it were, in that sense it is suitable as a relative speed meter. Even the smallest ones leave more lazily, even from MANPADS, from such a shot himself - not that.
              I don’t know what it is, but it looks menacing.
      6. +1
        9 June 2015 22: 04
        Missiles "AMUR" have long been in service, in the anti-satellite system of Moscow !!!! And this queen has very attractive characteristics, especially the starting speed !!! The ovs do not have those !!!! hi
      7. +4
        10 June 2015 04: 23
        Quote: Sukhoy_T-50
        Keep it up! Air defense / missile defense is the basis of the country's security!

        I'm already in the middle of now, I'm sincerely glad and support the air defense! In the "urgent" (1989-1991) I had to watch how the S300 "shoots" in Sary-Shagan. The most important thing is that we will eat sprats for the New Year 2016, not Latvian, but Kaliningrad! Good luck to all! hi
    2. +10
      9 June 2015 19: 23
      But it still seems to me that they tested 77N6 (the main caliber S-500) bully
    3. +18
      9 June 2015 19: 23
      It is very good! Finally, the positive went, and then the whole day one is negative. And the main place is very successful, the mattress has rubbed its eyes to the holes. After the launch of the new ICBM last year from Cap.Yara to Sary-Shagan, the mattress screamed about the violation of the INF Treaty. It’s just that these jackals cannot trace this section of the trajectory.
      1. gjv
        +1
        9 June 2015 20: 40
        Quote: ssn18
        It’s just that these jackals cannot trace this section of the trajectory.

        With the right test time.
      2. 0
        9 June 2015 21: 37
        The border flew. Here it is from Magadan to Khabarovsk to arrange ... European attempts are out of work. Instead of a mattress, only asterisks.
    4. +23
      9 June 2015 19: 24
      Damn, it's good that we have Shoigu. After the 90s, breathing straight is different.
      1. +12
        9 June 2015 19: 27
        I agree, but we lost 5 years! until Serdyukov was. Five years!
        1. +7
          9 June 2015 19: 41
          Quote: AdekvatNICK
          I agree, but we lost 5 years! until Serdyukov was. Five years!

          I’m sure to disappoint you, but launches were carried out annually by the furniture maker as part of inspections to extend the life of the anti-missile system.
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. gjv
            0
            9 June 2015 20: 44
            Quote: Alexey RA
            [I will probably disappoint you, but the launches went annually with the furniture maker as part of inspections to extend the life of the missile defense.

            A specific type of missile has not yet been reported, however m. These are the S-500 tests.
          3. 0
            10 June 2015 16: 22
            I'm talking about the loss of time in modernization in general, the entire army as a whole
        2. AUL
          +9
          9 June 2015 19: 55
          Yes, not five years! The time of stools must be counted for three years - after all, he not only did not build, but also tore down and plundered what was!
          Yes, this furniture maker cost us dearly!
          1. +6
            9 June 2015 20: 11
            Remember whose decree that snout became a minister or will we?
          2. +4
            9 June 2015 23: 02
            Quote from AUL
            this furniture maker cost us dearly!

            And it still thrives! All white, well-fed, fluffy and absolutely not guilty of anything! Also attached to a warm place! The position of our "guarantor" in relation to this pest causes complete bewilderment in me!
            1. 0
              10 June 2015 11: 31
              Quote: Saratoga833
              Quote from AUL
              this furniture maker cost us dearly!

              And it still thrives! All white, well-fed, fluffy and absolutely not guilty of anything! Also attached to a warm place! The position of our "guarantor" in relation to this pest causes complete bewilderment in me!

              Even though the secret bearer is immediately in pawns, we’ll wait and see the obituary: he died from overeating, a heart attack of the esophagus in combination with the stomach. Well, he choked, a lover of devouring. lol
        3. +8
          9 June 2015 21: 43
          Tolik was doing unfavorable work. Nobody agreed to make enemies. Therefore, they declared him untouchable on this topic. The thieving woman wasn’t even torn into rags. They glued Tolik as a screen. And the Ministry of Defense got rid of non-core assets and reduced costs. Now, at a new stage, combat training is more active the crisis has gone and not a hindrance. Not everything is simple in the Russian state
          1. -1
            9 June 2015 23: 07
            same opinion
          2. +1
            10 June 2015 04: 48
            Well, since military schools, air regiments and airfields, military factories and military science are non-core assets for the army and the state, then maybe thanks to him before the formation, with entry on a military ID?
            Okay, guys, THIS miracle was a puncture, and there is nothing to look for excuses. I am a stranger, I am neither warm nor cold from this showdown. Just seen clearly.
            IMHO, do you have road accidents with the dead? So we read it somehow.
    5. +4
      9 June 2015 19: 28
      Something so vague everything. What kind of rocket? For which complex? Oh, I suspect again some kind of surprise is being prepared for the adversary.
      1. +5
        9 June 2015 19: 29
        Quote: NEXUS
        Something so vague everything. What kind of rocket? For which complex? Oh, I suspect again some kind of surprise is being prepared for the adversary.

        Yes, amers probably already tensed. smile
      2. +17
        9 June 2015 19: 30
        What kind of rocket? For which complex?
        1. +10
          9 June 2015 19: 34
          Quote: Wiruz
          Aren't you a spy?

      3. +8
        9 June 2015 19: 34
        Quote: NEXUS
        Something so vague everything. What kind of rocket? For which complex? Oh, I suspect again some kind of surprise is being prepared for the adversary.

        Guys, everything is simple to banal - extending the resource of a product.
        "We swam - we know!" wink
        But it's nice that the former colleagues have worked, as always, excellently!
    6. +10
      9 June 2015 19: 29
      Missile system
    7. +2
      9 June 2015 19: 29
      Well, thank God that - "a successful launch of a Russian missile-interceptor missile defense system was carried out!"
      Only here is something that the year of commissioning, 1983, is somewhat confusing.
      Really, for more than 30 years, the rocket has not undergone any modifications and improvements? After all, everything "flows and changes", isn't it outdated?
      1. +1
        9 June 2015 20: 44
        So that "cockroaches do not start in the trunks" and similar launches are made. Specifically, they will not say what is launched, believe the retired air defense officer. Of course, all and all such systems will not be covered, the reality is that, even the Americans, with all their defense spending, cover only the Air Force base, where the missiles are located. They have ships with the "Aegis" system as a mobile version, but it is also penetrable.
        Quote: ia-ai00
        Well, thank God that - "a successful launch of a Russian missile-interceptor missile defense system was carried out!"
        Only here is something that the year of commissioning, 1983, is somewhat confusing.
        Really, for more than 30 years, the rocket has not undergone any modifications and improvements? After all, everything "flows and changes", isn't it outdated?
      2. +1
        10 June 2015 05: 07
        Yes, I am also very upset and angry. Have they not come up with new bayonets for rifles in 200 years? Still a blade, and rings on the trunk. Scandalous.
        And what and why to change? Her goal is still a bandura, clinging to the same unmodernized Newtonian mechanics. No, well, if that ballistics is no longer working, then they would be against the wall, of course, but if everything is the old fashioned way?
        Although, I missed the last advertisements of shampoo, if something really changed - I apologize below.
    8. +3
      9 June 2015 19: 30
      This is not for you to make stools.
      1. +9
        9 June 2015 19: 35
        She even needs a brain to make stools and her hands are not out of her ass. Christ was like a carpenter ... what
        1. +1
          9 June 2015 21: 47
          I will clarify, his pope Joseph
          1. +3
            9 June 2015 22: 24
            Quote: ty60
            I will clarify, his pope Joseph


            but from the father And he adopted ... because in ancient times from father to son.

            Is not he the carpenter, the son of Mary, the brother of Jacob, Josiah, Judah, and Simon? Is not here, between us, His sisters? And they were tempted about him. (Mark 6: 3)
    9. +2
      9 June 2015 19: 32
      The news recently showed an interesting same rocket. But what for the complex?
      1. +5
        9 June 2015 19: 37
        Quote: horoh
        The news recently showed an interesting same rocket. But what for the complex?

        Yes, all the same .... probably.
        Although, maybe a new engine was tested ..... maybe .... feel
    10. +7
      9 June 2015 19: 34
      The Sary-Shagan test site is simply an ideal place to start work on the creation of the Eurasian missile defense system in conjunction with China and Iran. This will be a worthy response to attempts to deploy American missile defense systems and nuclear missiles in Europe in close proximity to Russia's borders.
    11. +3
      9 June 2015 19: 35
      So they told you everything ...
    12. +3
      9 June 2015 19: 38
      You always rejoice when some positive changes are taking place in the armed forces! Very happy. So our defense industry has not only not died - it has risen from its knees and is really starting to work. It turns out more and more effective. Well done good !!!
      1. 0
        9 June 2015 23: 07
        Quote: pan.70
        our defense industry has not only not died - it has risen from its knees and is really starting to work

        If the furniture maker had been driven away earlier, it would have been much better and more timely!
    13. +2
      9 June 2015 19: 40
      It is reported that a launch site in Kazakhstan was chosen as the launch site, as it is located in an area that is virtually inaccessible for effective surveillance by American spy satellites.

      Why? Anomalous zone? request
      1. avt
        +5
        9 June 2015 20: 02
        Quote: Yeraz
        Umm, and that in the largest country in the world with different climatic conditions and terrain there was no place where it would be difficult for American spy satellites ??

        Quote: Vladimirets
        Why? Anomalous zone?

        Old soviet training ground. Well, not from Baikonur to let her go.
        Quote: podpolkovnik
        Guys, everything is simple to banal - extending the resource of a product.
        "We swam - we know!"

        Well, yes - they took it off duty and fired from the stand - it left normally. Well, maybe the launch time was a little bit closer to the "fateful" Zhzhzh 7van.
      2. +20
        9 June 2015 20: 17
        Vladimir Vladimir Today, 19:40
        It is reported that a launch site in Kazakhstan was chosen as the launch site, as it is located in an area that is virtually inaccessible for effective surveillance by American spy satellites.
        Why? Anomalous zone?

        .. almost ten .. TG-1 (laser telescope) from the LE-1 laser locator from object 41 / 42B of the 5N76 "Terra-3" laser firing complex remained alive on Sary-Shagan .. wink .. the mattress optics on reconnaissance punts are not very fond of when the TG-1 looks directly into the eye .. laughing
      3. +1
        9 June 2015 20: 21
        I think that Amer satellites rarely "cover it with vigil" ... Space is not a salt desert, then you will move to a better orbit
        1. 0
          9 June 2015 23: 20
          1987-1989 urgent at this training ground. Frequency of coverage (flight) over the Hungry Steppe once every 5 minutes, plus or minus 1,5-2 minutes. My schedule was hanging over the workplace.
        2. 0
          9 June 2015 23: 20
          1987-1989 urgent at this training ground (Six, who is in the know). Frequency of coverage (flight) over the Hungry Steppe once every 5 minutes, plus or minus 1,5-2 minutes. My schedule was hanging over the workplace.
        3. +1
          9 June 2015 23: 26
          Quote: tasey
          Space is not a salt desert, here you will move to a better orbit
          From what? At the command of the control center, the orbit changes. And I just informed the box that the dvigles on the ISS spontaneously turned on and she changed the orbit (increased), now they will correct it.
          And the last one. In the threatened period and with the beginning of the database, all satellites transfer to new orbits (if they have remote control), on command from the ground.
      4. +1
        10 June 2015 05: 25
        The inclination of the orbit.
        Satellites see strange. They are not everywhere and not always. In addition, they see / do not see well, either directly below them, then at an angle, or at different lighting angles. The same is true in different spectral ranges, at different times of the year, the activity of the Sun, the state of the atmosphere, the ionosphere ...
        In short - yours and this abused the poor black man from the barracks.
    14. 0
      9 June 2015 19: 43
      Umm, and that in the largest country in the world with different climatic conditions and terrain there was no place where it would be difficult for American spy satellites ??
      1. +1
        9 June 2015 20: 23
        see comment above .... they also have satellites, not like flocks of sheep
    15. +4
      9 June 2015 19: 59
      On missiles and anti-missiles
      Anti anti rockets scampering
      In the blue glare of the earthly light
      Five divisions fought on the moon
      (Yu.Vizbor)
    16. +3
      9 June 2015 20: 13
      Does Sary-Shagan work? Insanely happy! Hello Priozersk, and the rocket troops!
      PS What a pity that Vega is gone, now it would be very useful.
      1. 0
        9 June 2015 21: 52
        Kingdom of heaven Priozersky Daryalam. Pechersky modernize.
        1. +3
          10 June 2015 00: 48
          Sary-Shagan never closed. hi
          1. +4
            10 June 2015 05: 00
            Yes, it didn’t completely close, but since the collapse of the USSR it fell into decay crying Another question is why in the publication such nonsense to write:
            The missile launch was carried out from the Sary-Shagan Strategic Rocket Forces range (Republic of Kazakhstan). It is reported that a training ground in Kazakhstan was chosen as the launch site, as it is located in an area that is virtually inaccessible for effective surveillance by American spy satellites.

            This "to put it mildly" is not true. fool All missile defense test objects are visible even on commercial satellite imagery.
          2. 0
            11 June 2015 15: 06
            Quote: Kasym
            Sary-Shagan never closed. hi


            Yes it is, but if those who served there will see the ruined conservation zones in what ruin and ruins, so EBN with a stool will be remembered by port words ... if you want, find pictures of those places on Google Earth
    17. +1
      9 June 2015 20: 23
      Oban, what a joy, we silently stick in silently !!!
    18. +1
      9 June 2015 20: 36
      You are someone who has friends in America, after the launch of our missiles, call, the atom starts everything and everything is successful, we can not have this America for a long time)))
    19. +1
      9 June 2015 20: 44
      And I am glad that we still have friendly / good-neighborly relations with Kazakhstan. After all, it's not easy to “shoot” such a racket from the territory of another state wink
    20. +1
      9 June 2015 21: 42
      I was there in 1986 for a training exercise, a normal training ground, well that was preserved. wink
    21. 0
      9 June 2015 22: 38
      ! .. well, not full-scale tests! where is the defeat of forces and means with causing damage to the enemy.?! I am of course "for", but not idle .., choose a real target to defeat, and whining will still be ...
    22. 0
      10 June 2015 02: 51
      One thing pleases, do not stand still !!! Modernization has its own advantages.
    23. 0
      10 June 2015 06: 11
      if there was an anti-missile launch, should there have been a missile launch from another range, respectively? his n ... dos detected? or not? or it was a virtual goal.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"