The preservation of the Russian language is the preservation of the Russian "I"

98
Preservation of the Russian language is preservation of the Russian "I"

Annually 6 June in Russia is celebrated on the Pushkin Day (Day of the Russian language). That very day - 6 June 1799 - Alexander Pushkin was born in Moscow. Pushkin is considered the founder of the modern Russian literary language and is one of the pillars of Russian culture. In the Soviet Union, this day was celebrated as the Pushkin Festival of Poetry. In modern Russia, the state status of Alexander Pushkin’s birthday was received in 1997 by the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation “On the 200 anniversary of the birth of A.S. Pushkin and the establishment of the Pushkin Day of Russia. Then in 2011, the President of Russia signed a decree on the annual celebration of 6 on June, the Day of the Russian Language.

The Russian language is one of the main foundations of Russian civilization and statehood, our historical and cultural heritage. The roots of the Russian language go back to the deepest antiquity during the time of the direct ancestors of the Rus (Russians) - the Aryans (Indo-Europeans). It is not for nothing that linguists note a great closeness of the root bases of the Russian language with Sanskrit, the oldest literary language of India, the age of which’s earliest monuments go back to 3,5 thousand years (mid-second millennium BC). This is not surprising, since when the Aryans left the territory of modern India, Pakistan and Persia (Iran) from the territory of modern Russia, where their ancestral homeland was, the other part of the Aryans remained in place, giving rise to the Slavs, Germans, Balts and other Indo-European peoples.

The originality and antiquity of the Russian language was noted by Mikhail Lomonosov: “Slavic language does not originate from either Greek or Latin, nor from any other; consequently, it itself already consists of the most ancient times, and numerous of these peoples spoke in Slavic language even before Christmas. ” A nineteenth-century historian Egor Klassen wrote: "... The Slavs had a letter not only before all the western nations of Europe, but also before the Romans and even the Greeks themselves, and that the outcome of the enlightenment was from Russo to the west, and not from there to them."

No wonder the opponents of the Russian people are trying in every way to simplify, Westernize and ultimately destroy the Russian language. We observe the most vivid picture in Little Russia (Ukraine), where about a hundred years ago a significant part of the Rus (Russian) superethnos was recorded as “Ukrainians”. For a century, the process of creating the “Ukrainian chimera”, part of a united Russia-Russia inhabited by Russians, was instilled into the idea that they were a separate ethnic group, having the oldest history. The most important role was played by the process of creating the “Ukrainian language”, when adjustments were constantly made to the regional variety of the Russian language “(Mova”), Russian words were changed to Polish, or even new ones were invented. As a result, it came to the beginning of the “First Ukrainian War”, when Russians kill Russians, and all the benefits are received by the current owners of the “Ukrainian project”. Although the overwhelming majority of “Ukrainians” (“spoiled Russians”) are still genetically Russian, they think in Russian, watch Russian films, search for materials in Russian on the web. Even the most important “Ukrainian patriots” who are at the head of the country swear in Russian. The process of the de-Russification of Little Russia is still far from complete and is reversible; we need only political will.

In modern conditions, when information has become powerful weapons, the state of the Russian language and the science of it is alarming and worrying, and concern for the Russian language should be an important social and political issue. After all, the actual Russian language makes us Russians, representatives of the Russian civilization. Taking care of the Russian language ensures the fortress of the state and national security, and the absence of such care leads to irreversible tragic consequences.

The onset of Western culture, the "Americanization" of society, the degradation of the language leads to the loss of "Russianness" when millions of people of Russian descent become "ethnographic material" from which you can fashion anything. And the “economic man” who is interested only in the material side of life, and the cosmopolitan, indifferent to Russian history and culture, and the jihadist who is ready to kill the old men, women and children for the sake of Allah.

That is why the appeal to the life of the Russian language as the basis of our nation’s existence, conscious and purposeful study of the Russian language and teaching it as a native, second native, also spreading it in the world, an indispensable and paramount condition for the preservation of Russian civilization.

The situation in the sphere of the Russian language abroad and in Russia itself is disappointing. The number of speakers of the Russian language abroad is declining. A native speaker, mostly people of the Soviet generation are passing away. Their children no longer speak Russian, as in most post-Soviet republics militant nationalism won, and the Russian language is not honored. In addition, due to political factors, the Russian language is under pressure from local authorities (Baltic States, Ukraine). The most difficult and terrible situation in Ukraine is Ukraine, where a whole breed of Russian-born people is introduced - “Ukrainians”, who mostly think and speak Russian, but consider Russians as enemies. Russian language is displaced in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe.

However, Russia itself is not the best way. In 1990, the education and training system was under the control of the liberals. They did their best to destroy the Russian (Soviet) educational system, which was the best in the world. The Russian language has also suffered greatly. In Russia, the liberals are trying through the education system to form a lack of knowledge of the Russian language in the country.

There was a break in a single educational space. The schools have different Russian textbooks. In February, 2015, Chairman of the RF State Duma Committee on Security and Anti-Corruption, Irina Yarovaya called upon colleagues analyze current education standards and bring the Ministry of Education to personal responsibility for them. The situation began to reach the point that in Russian schools the study of the Russian language is less time consuming than the foreign one. Spring led the numbers: during her studies at the Russian school, the child learns Russian in the amount of 866 hours, and foreign - 939 hours. The Ministry of Education has announced plans to introduce the mandatory surrender of the EGE in a foreign language, and introduce another foreign language into the school curriculum. Spring asks: “What kind of citizens do we raise? Maybe the Russian state is not the customer of educational programs? ”

The clocks on basic subjects - Russian language, literature, mathematics and history - have been drastically reduced, they are studied for two hours. In the Soviet school, 4-5 hours were assigned to basic subjects. Great harm caused the introduction of the exam. Children lose the opportunity to not only competently express their thoughts, but also to express them in oral speech. In addition, a new generation of teachers, a generation of “democratic choice”, comes to schools, and the Soviet generation is leaving. This leads to a drop in the quality of teaching, and computerization does not save the situation, but on the contrary, worsens it.

A huge role in the destruction of the Russian language is played by the media, especially television. Anglicisms, slang and rudeness flooded TV. Russian literary language is actively simplified and supplanted. As a result, the degradation of the Russian language occurs both at the level of education and at the household level.

Formally, the authorities are trying to react to it. In 2013, the Russian Language Council was established under the Government of the Russian Federation under the leadership of Deputy Prime Minister Olga Golodets. In 2014, Russian President V. Putin signed a decree establishing the Russian language council. Unfortunately, despite the official support of the Russian language, there are no concrete measures to protect the language. Most of the Russian language is remembered for political purposes, as part of state propaganda. There is no awareness of the influence of the Russian language on the basic foundations of Russian civilization and statehood.

Obviously, in order to preserve our multi-thousand-year heritage, the Russian language, its Russian “I”, which will be lost with the loss of the Russian language, requires a serious system program. It is necessary to restore the best, basic beginnings of the Soviet program, schools; centrally engage in the support and development of the Russian language through the popularization and distribution of great Russian works, Russian books, Russian songs, Russian fairy tales, and so on; to actively disseminate the Russian language abroad and to support already existing developments.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

98 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +16
    6 June 2015 07: 49
    Basically, the Russian language is remembered for political purposes, as part of state propaganda. Liberasty from the government defend the Russian language? They create the appearance of protection and assimilate money - yes.
    1. -6
      6 June 2015 08: 40
      Quote: oleg-gr
      Liberasty from the government defend the Russian language? Create the appearance of protection

      Unlike you, the government does not use such expressions (liberalist), clogging up the Russian language!
      1. +7
        6 June 2015 09: 35
        Quote: Bayonet
        Unlike you, the government does not use such expressions (liberalist), clogging up the Russian language!

        In government, at least in public, many words are not used. The position, you know, obliges you to be politically correct. And in general, as the Marquis de Talleyrand said, in my opinion, "language is given to politics in order to hide his thoughts." hi
        1. +1
          6 June 2015 09: 41
          Quote: Bayonet
          Unlike you, the government does not use such expressions (liberalist), clogging up the Russian language!

          Yes they don’t use .. Like many other expressions popular among the people (and by the way very accurately express everything that happens in the world and in the country))))
          The bayonet in his repertoire .. (injection retreat, injection .. escaped ..) bully
          1. +3
            6 June 2015 09: 51
            Quote: MIKHALYCHXNNX
            injection .. escaped ..

            Yes, here I am, here. Why would I run away, a lot of fun can be read from fighters for the purity of the Russian language! What ornate expressions, what a deep thought, meaningful speech - just lovely!smile
            1. Frankenstucker
              +1
              6 June 2015 10: 03
              Quote: Bayonet
              You can read a lot of fun with fighters for the purity of the Russian language! What ornate expressions, what a deep thought, meaningful speech - just lovely!

              Comrade, move in, please, sit down next to me, I will also observe the feast of spirit.
              "- This is wonderful, I swear to God." Everyone who says that the other ... "" ©
              1. 0
                6 June 2015 11: 20
                Quote: Frankenstucker
                Comrade, please move in next,

                Please! Together more fun smile
                1. +7
                  6 June 2015 20: 34
                  Boring lessons about the important

                  Having parted reluctantly with toys,
                  In convincing himself that - “it is necessary!”,
                  Crouched a dull lad Pushkin,
                  Honoring the poems with a drooping look.

                  School programs decorated
                  Poets strings, but in fact -
                  Discover the country of great classics
                  The descendants were never able to.


                  Since then we strive to achieve in vain
                  Heights of art but dishonest
                  An ominous shadow of unculture
                  We are overtaken everywhere.

                  And how, tell me, will it be right?
                  Is it harsh to judge descendants? -
                  Or those guilty who stole

                  Living, sincere word ?!

                  Archpriest Alexy Zaitsev
                  1. 0
                    7 June 2015 20: 46
                    And what do you, Alena, think about our Ukrainian poets?
            2. +1
              6 June 2015 12: 37
              I had a dictionary of foreign words in my childhood. That is, words that have been borrowed from other languages. A very big book. To fight for the purity of the Russian language then it was worth starting about 700 years ago, since already after the Tatar invasion many Tatar words flowed into our language. Then Polish words flowed in, French, German and now English. And it seems like the Russian language remains Russian, despite all the borrowings. The language was much more affected by the reforms after the revolution. when some letters were removed and the language changed. Our language is not the language of Pushkin, and the language of Pushkin is not the language of ancient Russia. Everything flows and changes. Language is a means of communication and it changes over time, but its core and difference from others remains. You don’t have to raise a panic - read better about the protests of the intelligentsia after the revolution about the death of the Russian language from removing i (decimal), yat, feats and mortgages.
              1. +1
                6 June 2015 14: 48
                many Tatar words have flowed into our language.

                For 300 years, only about 50 words: hat, horse, shoe, bulldozer, iron, cockroach, booth, etc. It's not much, but they became ours. But Western European words are about 30 thousand, but without them our Great and Mighty would be poorer. Russian Civilization knows how to borrow and make other people's words their own. When you read "Eugene Onegin" by Pushkin, everything is modern.
                1. rodevaan
                  +2
                  7 June 2015 10: 07
                  A serious system program is needed. It is necessary to restore the best, basic principles of the Soviet program, schools; centrally engage in the support and development of the Russian language, through the popularization and distribution of great Russian works, Russian books, Russian songs, Russian fairy tales, etc .; actively disseminate the Russian language abroad and support existing achievements.

                  - I absolutely agree! Support and protection of the Russian language in the modern world in Russia is a must! For this, a special program should be developed:
                  1). Education - comprehensive language training and permanent master classes available to everyone - both Russian citizens and everyone who comes here to live and work - both foreigners and citizens of the former USSR. For this there must be a state program.
                  2). Language promotion - the promotion of literacy and literate speech, spelling, the eradication of ignorance, the popularization of mass and popular Russian culture, films, works of the great Russian classics, books, coverage of modern Russian literature.
                  3). Active defense of the Russian language from modern total pollution with all sorts of foreign and western equivalents, actively planted in the 90s of the mess and collapse. The state program should be aimed at protecting the language from this pollution - in particular, prohibit the use of foreign terms in public places, materials, publications and not use foreign equivalents if there are Russian original counterparts.
                  4). ANDactive propaganda and active promotion of the Russian language and Russian culture in other countries - both in the West and in the East - in Europe, in America, in Asia, in Africa.
                  5). Intensification of the study and popularization of the Russian language and Russian culture in all regions of Russia, regardless of the number of national minorities and the titular nation.

                  FOR THIS SHOULD BE CREATED AND ACTIVELY SUPPORTED BY THE INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL STATE PROGRAM!

                  This will allow Russian citizens to actively learn and use their native language correctly, to know and love their culture and Russian traditions perfectly, and at the same time to actively introduce and familiarize themselves with Russian traditions and Russian culture as ALL peoples of Russia living in the country, and foreign citizens, improving image of the country in the international arena, and helping other nations to know and understand our country and our people better!
                2. 0
                  7 June 2015 22: 10
                  Russian Civilization can borrow and make other people's words their own.

                  In general, civilization itself must look for meanings ...
                  and give guises to these senses. In the form of words.
                  Well, you can't all the time on the "trophy" lol
                  And by the way, no one asks people.
                  All borrowing occurs through the elite. First.
                  Wench selling enta elite.
                  The elite spoke French at one time.
                  While on Borodino field I did not understand what language is more beautiful.
          2. Houston
            0
            7 June 2015 06: 28
            Quote: MIKHALYCHXNNX

            and by the wayЕ

            You, for a start, learn to write correctly in Russian, and only then pull yourself up to discuss his native language.
            1. +1
              7 June 2015 08: 08
              Quote: Houston
              Quote: MIKHALYCHXNNX

              and by the wayЕ

              You, for a start, learn to write correctly in Russian, and only then pull yourself up to discuss his native language.


              In Russian.

              To tell you the truth, it’s not without sin itself. feel
      2. 0
        6 June 2015 15: 21
        However, you are not entirely right! Liberalists prefer the word "hamsters", which is no less littered with the Russian language.
    2. Alex rus
      0
      6 June 2015 10: 24
      This is especially clearly seen in the media such as RBC and Rain, it seems that you watch foreign channels, you learn so many words. And then it turns out that they are easily translated into Russian.
      1. The comment was deleted.
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. +1
      6 June 2015 14: 56
      The second concept of language is people. To take away the language - to cease the existence of a national identity. Pagan religions were popular, and then became state. But that's another topic.
  2. +4
    6 June 2015 07: 51
    Thank you.
    I agree with the author that if it is permissible to "litter" the Russian language with jargon, then to a very insignificant extent.
    Now I understand why I feel great sympathy for India))
    1. +7
      6 June 2015 08: 42
      Quote: shishakova
      Thank you.
      I agree with the author that if it is permissible to "litter" the Russian language with jargon, then to a very insignificant extent.
      Now I understand why I feel great sympathy for India))

      Jargon does not spoil the language, but words with foreign roots really pose a danger to the language
      1. +1
        6 June 2015 09: 43
        Quote: forester
        Jargon does not spoil the language, but words with foreign roots really pose a danger to the language

        Sorry, but this happened in 1952, during the "fight against cosmopolitanism." The menu was renamed then into a razblyudovka, a waitress into a dishwasher, a voltmeter into a tension meter ... And from all this, only the "city" bun, formerly "French", 7 kopecks, took root, if anyone remembers. I wonder if she has remained now, as it is called, and most importantly how much?
        1. ivan.ru
          0
          6 June 2015 11: 13
          tried to transform, at the level of individual newspaper articles, no more. if you remember. and gibbering is a perfectly used professional term.
        2. The comment was deleted.
      2. +1
        6 June 2015 09: 53
        Quote: forester
        words - with foreign roots really poses a danger to the language


        Thank. Agree with you. And in many respects we ourselves are to blame - what we can say in the Russian word, we replace it with a foreign one))
        1. 0
          6 June 2015 17: 57
          Quote: shishakova
          And in many ways we are to blame ourselves - what we can say with the Russian word, we replace with a foreign one))

          Sweet bite madam. And weakly write your login in Russian. It all starts with a small one, from oneself.
      3. +6
        7 June 2015 00: 51
        Quote: forester
        Jargon does not spoil the language, but words with foreign roots really pose a danger to the language

        Oh, damn it, homegrown linguists!
        Not that we care, oh not that! One or two words will not spoil the language, whether it is jargon or foreign.
        The danger, in my opinion, is different.
        Napoleon once said: "The songs of the victors always sound over the cities of the vanquished." Inadvertently, listen to what is pouring out of the boxes and columns of neighboring TLVs, radio reporters ...
        Liberalists are at the helm today, but it is unfortunate to hear this from someone. Look who is engaged in mass culture, education ... That's right! It is they! Even Soros rode to the fresh ... Liberals did everything to destroy the best education system in the world that prevailed in the USSR, replacing it with the ersatz of the Unified State Examination and the chewing gum of a consumer society. (And then my post from 23.03/2013/XNUMX.)
        Today is the age of cinema and TV ... The descendants of Moses need "this country" only for gesheft. Why do they need the national identity of the natives? And suddenly they will see the light and see who the "beneficiary" is. Then go again dear Agasfera? They cannot allow this. So ... they will put the brains of the young. It's empty because the state hasn't invested anything patriotic there. Even the textbooks were "forgotten", since Sores (Judas!) Took care. To disarm spiritually is to win halfway. So God's chosen ones are working for the future, and our fifth column is cutting the loot, snatching Hollywood "beads" to the natives.
        Look at the inter-vision. Which of our singers dared to sing in Russian there !? The question is: what country did they represent in this competition, if they did not say a word in Russian?
        Swedes, French, Greeks, Armenians - sang in their native language. And we are imported, for the sake of the owners? But these figures consider themselves to be the elite of society, bearers of culture (just what?).
        Maybe I.V. was right Stalin, calling them cosmopolitans like rootless?
        That is why, in my opinion, it is necessary to revive the national pride of the Great Russians! And an example in this should be given by cultural figures, idols of millions. So then not to be surprised: how so, Makar - was reborn when, damn it, he managed to curly?
        IMHO.
    2. 0
      7 June 2015 13: 04
      Hindus also actively clog their tongue with English words, sometimes pronouncing whole phrases in English rather than Hindi. In films, this is often seen.
  3. -13
    6 June 2015 07: 52
    I think that not everything that happens with the Russian language is bad, the language that Ukrainians speak today is also Russian, only older, and the current Russian language that Russia speaks is an improved old, Russian language, so of course you need to do something, linguists have something to think about, but people will speak as they like. I want to note that swear words make up almost 50% of the vocabulary in some social subgroups, which also directly affects the culture of communication.
    1. +11
      6 June 2015 08: 29
      Actually, Mova is a mixture of Polish and Russian. Put on the southern dialect.
      1. 0
        6 June 2015 08: 40
        Who told you that?
        1. +1
          6 June 2015 14: 30
          When did Ukraine appear as an independent state? How many decades (generations) was it part of the Commonwealth? Who brought the elements of the Latin alphabet to the "language're coming out"?
          What kind of language independence are you talking about? These are all dialects of Russian !!!
      2. -5
        6 June 2015 10: 22
        Quote: Alex_Rarog
        In general, Mova is a mixture of Polish and Russian. Laid on the southern dialect

        so to speak, you put Russian as the main language, and Ukrainian, Belarusian, etc. - as its clogged dialects
        This is not so, the Ukrainian, Russian, Belarusian languages ​​(and other Slavic languages) are completely independent from the common Old Russian language as part of the East Slavic group of languages ​​(but to be honest, Russian is just like Old Russian - like poplar like a birch)
        The Old Russian period (VI-XIV centuries). Its beginning is considered to be the process of separation of the Eastern Slavs from the common Slavic unity and the appearance of the first East Slavic linguistic features (VI-VII centuries). The main part of this historical stage, common to all three East Slavic languages, falls on the era of the formation, development and decay of the Old Russian language (IX-XIV centuries). The Old Russian period ends in the XIV century, when the linguistic features of those who began the independent development of the Russian, Ukrainian and Belarusian languages ​​take shape.
        1. +5
          6 June 2015 11: 00
          But Wasserman believes that Ukrainian and Belarusian are dialects of the Russian language.
        2. +7
          6 June 2015 15: 30
          Quote: atalef
          The Old Russian period ends in the XIV century, when the linguistic features of those who began the independent development of the Russian, Ukrainian and Belarusian languages ​​take shape.

          Both Russian, Belarusian, and Ukrainian languages ​​are national (today) dialects of the Old Slavic language, which has sunk into oblivion with the Christianization of Russia. Then Russia began to speak with the Bulgarian dialect that came to Russia along with church books and Bulgarian clergy.
          That was just the beginning ...
          With the beginning of the expansion of Russia to the northeast, new local dialects began to appear, markedly different from those spoken both in Kiev and Novgorod the Great - the influence of the neighborhood with the Finnish-Ugric tribes inhabiting the territories where the colonists came from the banks of the Dnieper.
          But the Kiev dialect did not live up to modern times. The period of stay under the rule of the Commonwealth had a striking influence on the language of the Little Russians. At that moment, not only Polish and Lithuanian words appeared in the language of Little Russians. During this period, Little Russians "lost" their historical memory. The legends about the ancient Russian (mythical) heroes were replaced with legends about a certain legendary Cossacks. That is, Little Russians almost deliberately began to lead their history from the times of the Zaporozhye Sich.
          The current mythical tales created after the Maidan are not required to be discussed.
          If we add that more than a wave of nomads and their followers swept through the territory of the Black Sea from the fourteenth to the seventeenth centuries (Ottoman Turks, like the Tatars who later settled in Crimea), talking about the purity of the Ukrainian language makes no sense.
        3. +3
          6 June 2015 15: 44
          Quote: atalef
          ...


          I agree with you that the basis for modern Russian, Belarusian and Ukrainian was one Old Russian (Old Slavonic ... well, you understand, by the way, just below you correctly corrected me not Great Russian, namely Old). The question is, what was the driving force behind the development of all these three dialects of one language? Russian - an ordinary evolution, as elsewhere (even in the West, even in the East, i.e. the essence is the same, not in spite of something!), But for the Ukrainian and Belarusian (Russia was under the heel of the Commonwealth for a long time), the main goal is the same - to tear the people of the West of Russia from their own blood in the East, to oppose one to another, to make Rusich / Rus / Rosov / Rusin / Rus / Russian - “ukrov” and “litvin”, which partly our “partners” succeeded in over the years of efforts.
        4. 0
          7 June 2015 21: 22
          Maybe tell you about your native language ???
    2. +4
      6 June 2015 08: 55
      Quote: Igor39
      I think that not everything that happens with the Russian language is bad, the language that Ukrainians speak today, also Russian, is only older.


      To be precise, initially "Mova" - one of the dialects of Great Russian, which was taken as the basis of the modern "ukroyazyka", was indeed one of its archaic and folk forms, the reformers of Russophobes tried their best, and the author points out that they began to supplant the Russian principle from the language, replacing it with Polonisms and Germanisms, and sometimes inventing new words on the go, so that they do not look like Russian. So, the modern "Mova" is a monster that has practically nothing in common with the good old Malorussian dialect of Great Russian. And this new "mov" is less than 100 years old, I would even say, 20 years old, exactly as long as they furiously mock the language.
      1. -8
        6 June 2015 10: 23
        Quote: Rarog
        To be precise, initially "Mova" is one of the dialects of Great Russian

        No Great Russian language, does not exist by definition
        The Ukrainian language is not a dialect (like Belorussian) - the same by definition
      2. +1
        6 June 2015 14: 54
        In such a dialect only servility can develop.
    3. +1
      6 June 2015 09: 44
      I think that not everything that happens with the Russian language is bad


      I agree. The language must change. The speed of change is important. Just like in biology - heredity and variability. Doubters - read The Word on the Shelf in the original. But it shouldn't change quickly either. Everything that defines a nation is transmitted not by genes, but by upbringing up to the everyday level, by the foundations, traditions, and family structure. In short, in what environment most people of this nation grow up.
      A quick change of language can also cause an "unwanted mutation" The danger in the speed of change has arisen due to communication, communication, population migration. Well, people don't sit on the stove in the village of Karacharovo now. Who will understand the phrase "to climb on cholki", "Basque, not by thought". But even 40 years ago, people spoke so and understood each other.
    4. +3
      6 June 2015 14: 51
      Of the six Ukrainian words, four are Polish, one is German and one is Russian. This is an artificial, rural, small-town dialect, invented 150 years ago by the Austro-Hungarians. What language is, so is thinking with behavior. What we see today. There will never be achievements in science, culture and art on such a "river".
    5. 0
      7 June 2015 21: 36
      The language that Ukrainians today speak RUSSIAN, but what is now called the Ukrainian language is bullshit, and also differs from the Ukrainian literary language (which was systematized and designed as an independent language in the Soviet Union), as Church Slavonic (Old Slavic) , from modern Russian.
      Guess what a trickster is?
  4. +6
    6 June 2015 08: 00
    This is all true. There is a Francophonie, Goethe institutions. They promote their languages ​​with archaic plus-ke-parfait. The correct Russian language is incense for the not-so-developed dialects of the "great Ukrainian" or the equally great "Latvian languages". What was being destroyed together with the Union is mortally dangerous for the "enlightened West" and their servants. Therefore, they are against any restoration of their legal rights as the language, which united 300 million people, and against everything that has the word "Russian".
    Here is the Russian spirit
    Here, Russia smells!
  5. +8
    6 June 2015 08: 05
    Russian language - it is necessary to protect and preserve. And write on it with a minimum of errors. Even on the forums. The more complex the language, the more developed it is - the more shades of thought can be expressed with its help.
    And Ukrainian is the language of the villagers. About the same developed. It simply does not (yet) have complex concepts, scientific terms ...
    Actually, what they are doing now with Ukrainian youth, depriving it of the Russian language, and giving in return - a surrogate, hastily sloppy.
    My acquaintances techies say they CANNOT READ LECTURES in Ukrainian, well, there are no necessary words and concepts there.
    And their fate will be sad.
    1. +10
      6 June 2015 08: 13
      God forbid I get together at the ball
      Ile on a porch ride
      With a seminarian in a yellow chalet
      Ile with an academician in a cap!
      Like mouth rosy without a smile,
      No grammatical error
      I do not like Russian speech.

      Maybe in my misfortune
      Beauties new generation,
      Magazines heeding the praying voice,
      Grammar will teach us;
      Poems will be introduced into use;
      But I ... what matters to me?
      I will be faithful to antiquity.
      A.S. Pushkin "Eugene Onegin"
      1. +4
        6 June 2015 11: 34
        Quote: Igor39
        A.S. Pushkin "Eugene Onegin"

        And if in the spirit of the times, but with your favorite character:

        God forbid I get together at the ball
        Ile on a porch ride
        With a seminarian in a yellow chalet
        Ile with a liberal in a cap!
        fellow
        1. 0
          7 June 2015 21: 45
          Yes, sarcasm is good.
      2. 0
        6 June 2015 13: 43
        This plus is to Alexander Sergeyevich. One who knows everything!
      3. +1
        6 June 2015 14: 56
        Pushkin has no superfluous words; he is always precise and verified in words. Read carefully "speeches", but not letters.
    2. -5
      6 June 2015 10: 31
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      Russian language - must be preserved and preserved

      That's for sure, friends come to me every year, so every year they introduce new words in communication - I’m sometimes completely confused because I just don’t understand their meaning
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      And Ukrainian is the language of the villagers. It is approximately the same developed. It simply does not (yet) have complex concepts, scientific terms

      Do you speak Ukrainian to make such statements?
      so note
      Quote: Direct
      The Russian people cannot be seduced by the idea of ​​superiority over other nations and the idea of ​​violence over the weak. This is the high spirituality of our people, their humanity and compassion even for enemies

      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      My acquaintances techies say they CANNOT READ LECTURES in Ukrainian,

      Can they be in English or Spanish?
      So there are no complex concepts and terms?
      I will tell you one thing. Your friends just do not know the Ukrainian language (like me), and you need to learn Ukrainian as a foreign language (who said that the languages ​​are similar?) --- Every year I come to Ukraine, I catch myself thinking that 80% of the news do not understand.
      This is a different language, the same rich, having its own history, and not the language of villagers and idiots.
      1. +3
        6 June 2015 11: 04
        There is no such thing as "Ukrainian language".
        1. Frankenstucker
          -3
          6 June 2015 11: 41
          Quote: Darkness
          There is no such thing as "Ukrainian language".

          curious. There is no concept, but there is a language.
          1. +3
            6 June 2015 14: 58
            This is not a language. This is a dialect of the outskirts of Rus mixed artificially with Polish and German words.
        2. 0
          7 June 2015 21: 52
          There is a concept, there is no language (today) !!!
      2. +2
        7 June 2015 21: 51
        Oksti the holy fool, I myself was born, grew up in Ukraine, studied the Ukrainian language (that is, eradina mova), I often don’t understand this Polish-Romanian ... etc. dialect.
    3. +1
      7 June 2015 21: 43
      Forgive me for the intrusion, but how can they “read” lectures on “mov” when this same “mov” for twenty-three years has “endured” such that even the “Bolsheviks” with their redrawing of the Russian language “nervously smoke” on the sidelines.
  6. +4
    6 June 2015 08: 11
    What verses A.S. Pushkin wrote ... In general, the Russian language is multifaceted and unique, like the Russian soul!
    I erected a monument to myself not made by hands,
    People's path will not grow to it,
    He ascended higher as the head of the unruly
    The Alexandrian Pillar.

    No, all I will not die - the soul in the treasured lyre
    My dust will survive and the corruption will run away -
    And I will be glorious, before the sublunary world
    At least one pite will be alive.

    The rumor about me will pass all over Russia great,
    And every language that is in it will call me,
    And the proud grandson of the Slavs, and the Finn, and now the wild
    Tungus, and a friend of the Kalmyk steppes.

    And for a long time I will be so kind to the people,
    What kind feelings did I awaken with lyre,
    That in my cruel age I praised Freedom
    And mercy to the fallen called.

    By the will of God, O muse, be obedient,
    Resentment without fear, without demanding a crown,
    Praise and slander were accepted indifferently
    And do not challenge a fool.
  7. +6
    6 June 2015 08: 11
    Do you know that existence current state of Ukraine made possible only thanks To Lenin и Stalin: at the direction of Vladimir Ilyich was created Ukrainian Socialist Soviet Republic, and Joseph Vissarionovich authorized forced Ukrainization - The imposition of artificial Ukrainian as an official language, as the language of education, literature, cinema, media .Do you know that the first "Ukrainians" appeared at the end of the XNUMXth century in Eastern Galicia (now the territory of Western Ukraine)?
    "And so Galician writers tackle this important matter. A language is being created for
    institutions, schools, sciences, magazines. Material is taken from both German and Polish, and
    of the Latin language, they are forged according to the folk pattern of the word, and all together gives the desired
    higher order language. And, there’s nowhere to put the truth, there is a lot of undesirable in this language, but
    what was to be done? ”
    - (Steshenko I. About Ukrainian Literary Movement. K., 1912. - C.15)
    The question is what language is really native for Ukrainians,
    "Nationally conscious" tried to circumvent. But life itself set this
    question. At the all-Ukrainian congresses of teachers and journalists held in 1918
    it was noted that the peasants going to rural gatherings do not understand Ukrainian
    language and often after listening to speeches by government delegates to
    "Sovereign mov" require translate what was said into Russian
    Elpatievsky
    S.Ukraine and Russia // Native land. 1918. No 1 - C.105
    That this language was invented as a tool the occupation of the Russian people of Little Russia,
    says the fact that Ukrainization in the Ukrainian SSR in the 20s led Lazar Moiseevich
    Kaganovich

    “The servants took the most seriously Ukrainization - Jews. И
    really learned over these six months "
    - he wrote in his diary in October
    1924. At the same time, S.A. Efremov noted, Ukrainians ("also Little Russians") followed
    Great Russians strongly opposed Ukrainization and stubbornly did not want to teach
    Move. "
    In 1893 year the Austrian parliament officially approved the phonetic writing for the "Ukrainian language".
    Further, the technique was simple: using police measures in all educational institutions began to impose "kulishovka" (Ukrainian spelling), select books written in literary Russian, close literary societies and dismiss all teachers who disagree with this innovation... "Phonetics" is used for official office work, publication of periodicals, and book printing. The flywheel of the Ukrainization of Rusyns began to gain momentum. This is confirmed by the later revelations of the Minister of Education and Confessions. Petliura Directory of Metropolitan Illarion, who said that the success of the introduction of "phonetics" was due only to the fact that "tsei pravopys zdobuv sobi uryadove zatverdzhennya" (this spelling received government support)
    Throughout the XIX century in the Russian Empire it was believed that the common Russian language
    of the following options:
    Great Russian language, now Russian language;
    Little Russian, now Ukrainian;
    Belarusian language
    These options were not considered as separate languages, but as dialects of Russian.
    1. +2
      6 June 2015 09: 34
      Quote: Fantik13
      Did you know that the existence of the current state of Ukraine became possible only thanks to Lenin and Stalin: at the direction of Vladimir Ilyich, the Ukrainian Socialist Soviet Republic was created,

      No. The Ukrainian SSR was created in opposition to the UPR (Ukrainian People's Republic). Ukraine, at that time still Little Russia, began to "sail away" from the Russian Empire, back in the spring of 17th year. Under Kerensky. They wanted a very significant autonomy, with the capital in In general, the Central Rada advocated the FULL separation of Ukraine from Russia. Kerensky did not particularly interfere with this, and his visit to Kiev, with the ministers Tsereteli and Tereshchenko, in July 17, suggests that he visited in fact, a neighboring state. As a result, in November 17th, the Ukrainian People's Republic emerged. The capital was Kiev. In spite of it, the Hetman, Skoropadskaya, in December 17th, Soviet Ukraine appeared. The capital was Kharkov. Politics and others. situations.
      1. +1
        7 June 2015 22: 00
        Dear you were a little mistaken, not "Soviet Ukraine", but the Donetsk-Kryvyi Rih Republic (DKR) with its capital in Kharkov, and later in Lugansk was created in the "peak" of the UNR.
  8. +8
    6 June 2015 08: 16
    If there was a referendum now in the former territory of the CCCR, then besides Priblyat and the crazy Kanderstadt, the majority voted for a single country with a single Russian language ..
    Damn Gorbachev, Kravchuk, Shushkevich and the drunk Yeltsin, who have ruined a great country!
    1. +1
      6 June 2015 08: 52
      Quote: Vladimir Pozlnyakov
      Priblyatov and the insane Banderstadt,

      A masterpiece!
    2. 0
      6 June 2015 09: 49
      Quote: Vladimir Pozlnyakov
      Priblyatov

      In my time they were called baldons.
      1. Frankenstucker
        +1
        6 June 2015 10: 08
        Quote: Nagan
        In my time they were called baldons.

        and in my Balts they were called - the Balts. Apparently, a lack of imagination, nda-s ...
        1. +1
          6 June 2015 10: 56
          Quote: Frankenstucker
          and in my Balts they were called - the Balts.

          In mine too.
  9. +2
    6 June 2015 08: 23
    Language is the system of thinking itself, some priorities, the author correctly said, this is our "I", but according to studies where English appears, native languages ​​simply disappear there, expansion is hidden in English itself.
  10. +7
    6 June 2015 08: 24
    the reduction of hours of the Russian language at school is a consequence of the occupation regime, after losing the war in 1991 ... slaves must speak the language of their masters!
    One thing remains - to fight for the overthrow of the yoke, to read for ourselves and to teach children to read ...
    There is also an interesting direction in the internet - the study of the ancient Russian initial letter (Cyrillic - its simplified version) ...
    There is interesting from Zadornov about this
    1. 0
      6 June 2015 08: 44
      Quote: morozik
      the reduction in hours of the Russian language at school is a consequence of the occupation regime, after losing the war in 1991 ...

      Painful imagination ... Go out and declare it publicly, it is interesting to look at the reaction of others wassat
      1. +2
        6 June 2015 10: 45
        Quote: Bayonet
        Painful imagination ... Go out and declare it publicly, it is interesting to look at the reaction of others

        At least 10 percent are aware of this:

        the reduction of hours of the Russian language at school is a consequence of the occupation regime, after losing the war in 1991 ... slaves must speak the language of their masters!

        The reaction will be positive. Sure.
        And you boo. lol
        1. 0
          6 June 2015 10: 58
          Quote: Babr
          The reaction will be positive. Sure.

          And I think positive - people will laugh! laughing You never know "eccentrics" .... But it is possible that they will give in the forehead!
          1. +1
            6 June 2015 11: 25
            So after all, the law of time has not been canceled.
            People grow out of short pants, grow up.
            Understanding comes.
            Remember, a year ago, we got into trouble over the Jewish question.
            Well, about the bell tower?
            Then the word Jew was "taboo".
            Now they are declining for the cases.
            Although it is not entirely right to blame the people for all mortal sins.
            Well, nothing, time will pass and they will understand.
  11. +2
    6 June 2015 08: 35
    With both hands for the article. I wanted to add something, but in time I remembered about the moderators.
  12. +6
    6 June 2015 08: 44
    "The Russian language is one of the main foundations of Russian civilization and statehood, our historical and cultural heritage."
    That is why the liberal bastard today in the media and in the government, in every possible way distorts and perverts Russian culture and the entire education system.
    1. 0
      6 June 2015 08: 50
      Quote: Nikita Gromov
      The liberal bastard today in the media and in the government, in every possible way distorts and perverts Russian culture and the entire education system.

      Here is a good example of the "purity" of the Russian literary language! laughing
      1. +5
        6 June 2015 09: 14
        Quote: Bayonet
        Here is a good example of the "purity" of the Russian literary language!

        I'll try to stand up for Nikita.

        The Russian language is primarily the transmission of images orally. (English - trading, German - action, etc.)
        The word "librasty" does not fit into the canons of the grammar of the Russian language written for Russians by non-Russians, but it is understandable to all Russians without translation and quite accurately reflects the essence, content and attitude of the speaker to those of whom he is talking. The main thing is to be understood.
        1. Frankenstucker
          0
          6 June 2015 10: 34
          Quote: Boris55
          The Russian language is primarily the transmission of images orally. (English - trading, German - action, etc.)

          that is, German is not
          Quote: Boris55
          oral transmission

          ??
          Zegers and Remarca will not read in the original anymore. There is no transfer of images. Only one
          Quote: Boris55
          действие
          . Sadness ... It is strange how Floyd managed to sing, and Dickens to write in
          Quote: Boris55
          English - shopping
          1. 0
            6 June 2015 13: 23
            Quote: Frankenstucker
            Zegers and Remarca will not read in the original anymore. No image transfer

            Well of course not. We are talking about the predisposition of one or another language to the surrounding reality, in the need to use it in everyday life by the majority. If English reflects the need for most of its native speakers to trade, this does not mean that some of its representatives are not capable of muse either.
            1. Frankenstucker
              +1
              6 June 2015 13: 38
              Quote: Boris55
              It is about the predisposition of a language to the surrounding reality

              yes it is already complete. There is no
              Quote: Boris55
              predispositions of one or another language
              ... It is foolish to say that the language of Chaucer and Dickens is "predisposed" to trade just because the whole world uses English for the utilitarian purposes of international communication.
              1. 0
                6 June 2015 15: 01
                Quote: Frankenstucker
                Yes, it’s full.

                And so they slowly approached the question - what is primary: the language, as in itself or the occupation of its speakers, forming it. For some reason, it seems to me that the latter is true. Any word, written or spoken, is control. Based on the occupation and management features, a language is formed. Working conditions are changing - the language of communication is changing, etc. Exceptions are always and everywhere.

                The spread of the English language is due to the development of the technosphere, but this is not for long. Its use in international communication does not lead to peace - it leads to the search for "oil" laughing
  13. +3
    6 June 2015 08: 56
    Why do we need Russian? You are writing enemies, from what collective farm did this word come out? The last time I heard the word volunteer was a year before the Olympics. We must speak the English volunteer (ets). And in stores season sale (s).
  14. +4
    6 June 2015 09: 21
    And the nineteenth-century historian Yegor Klassen wrote: "... The Slavs had a letter not only before all the Western peoples of Europe, but also before the Romans and even the Greeks themselves, and that the outcome of enlightenment was from the Russians to the West, and not from there to them."

    Klassen just mentions Fomenko, as it falls into his New Chronology. And he wrote about Sanskrit. Only it was not the division of the Slavs, but the conquest of India by the Slavs, etc. Read Fomenko-Nosovsky, you will understand a lot in history. By the way, the current distortion of modern facts by the West, this is all according to the theory of Fomenko.
  15. +4
    6 June 2015 09: 24
    "It is necessary to restore the best, basic principles of the Soviet program, schools; centrally engage in the support and development of the Russian language, through the popularization and distribution of great Russian works, Russian books, Russian songs, Russian fairy tales, etc.; actively spread the Russian language abroad and support existing developments"...

    Well, the author, being neither the President of the Russian Federation, nor the Prime Minister, nor any minister, outlined a program for preserving the Russian language ...

    And after all, there is nothing complicated - return the Soviet education program, remove the dominance of obscure books from store shelves and obscure cartoons from TV screens ...

    Is it really so hard to understand in the government and in the Duma ???

    Obviously - it’s difficult ... Therefore, THEIR children are taught THERE ...
  16. +4
    6 June 2015 09: 29
    If you consider yourself patriots, but there is not enough logic to recognize Fomenko, read FIVE SENSATIONS of Dragunkin. He is a philologist and clearly proves that all European languages ​​and not only descended from Russian. He also proved that the mat is not a legacy of the Tatar-Mongol, a purely Russian origin. And this is not Fomenko, but also confirms his theory. Study.
    1. 0
      6 June 2015 12: 31
      If you want to know more, then do not grab the sensations, but simply ask yourself for the opinion of science. Do not doubt that real scientists know philology much better than your Dragunkin.
  17. Frankenstucker
    -3
    6 June 2015 09: 56
    The enduring feel of the buffet in the theater of the absurd ... The concern of the author and commentators on the refinement of the OW is quite funny. Of course, bigots immediately connected with their denunciation of parasitic words, borrowings, neologisms and network slang. About popularization and distribution of great Russian works, Russian books, Russian songs, Russian fairy tales, etc. - to the detriment of world masterpieces? Or in parallel? Huckleberry Finn is already being banned for "propaganda for vagrancy and begging." Clever, to be sure.
    1. +1
      6 June 2015 12: 27
      Russia exists as long as the Russian people exist, and the people are their culture. Without its culture, a people is just an ethnographic material for replenishing other peoples and cultures. If we want to preserve Russia, then we need to preserve Russian culture, and not replace it with "world masterpieces" of foreign origin. I have nothing against Huckberry Finn, but Russian literature should prevail in Russia over foreign.
      1. Frankenstucker
        0
        6 June 2015 13: 23
        Quote: yurta2015
        If we want to save Russia

        "Don't be shy for your dear homeland ..." ©
        1. 0
          6 June 2015 17: 15
          I am "shy" (sick) for Russia because I am Russian. I am sure that every Russian cheers for her as much as I do. It is quite another matter those whose ancestors ended up in Russia (mostly not of their own free will) from the 18th century and later (under Peter, Catherine, Alexander, the Bolsheviks). For them, Russia is not a mother, but a stepmother, and many of them do not have the slightest desire to "shy" for her.
  18. +1
    6 June 2015 09: 57
    The most massive attack on the Russian language took place at Fursenko, who really made fun of the language and education. I think it will come to him. Alive smoking room, sitting somewhere.
  19. +9
    6 June 2015 10: 07
    There is a deliberate destruction of the Russian language. Why is the President called "Vladimir Putin" and not "Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin"? The absence of a middle name is an invention of only European countries. We say "Ivan, not remembering kinship" with great derision. Why do our athletes, speaking not only in the West, but also on our T-shirts, write their own names in Latin? When did you see a foreign athlete performing with us with the inscriptions on his T-shirt in Russian? Why in the TV show "Voice of Russia" our kids are yelling, they are yelling, and not singing not in Russian, but in English? Do we have our own songs? Why, sometimes, the Japanese singing our songs in Russian, while all the Western "balalaika players" do not perform a single song in Russian? Why do our singers prefer English when performing in front of a Russian audience, although the vast majority are not familiar with this language? And all this is happening at the state level! It seems that Russian is contraindicated for our rulers!
    1. Frankenstucker
      -6
      6 June 2015 10: 21
      Quote: Saratoga833
      There is a deliberate destruction of the Russian language.

      come on. Language is a substance that cannot be destroyed, all the more so “purposefully”.
      Quote: Saratoga833
      Do not sing not in Russian, but in English?

      so what? Modern pop masterpieces with the rhymes "come and go", "blood-love", of course, are highly spiritual and recommended for kids to sing?
      1. +4
        6 June 2015 12: 17
        Quote: Frankenstucker
        Language is a substance that cannot be destroyed, all the more so “purposefully”.

        Maybe not, maybe yes. When you see that children start learning English in schools earlier than Russian, there is a suspicion that this is being done consciously. Especially if this is combined with the absolute dominance of Hollywood production on cinema screens and the prevailing propaganda of English-language culture in pop music. There is a feeling that children are taught to perceive the English-language culture in the original. And if its superiority is already embedded in the consciousness of a generation, then Russian culture automatically becomes unnecessary, and with it the Russian language.
        1. Frankenstucker
          -4
          6 June 2015 12: 55
          Quote: yurta2015
          There is a feeling that children are taught to perceive the English-language culture in the original.

          Well, I "perceive in the original". So what? Excuse me, but what other languages ​​do you speak Russian? I don't mean Google translator, of course.
          1. +2
            6 June 2015 17: 40
            I do not consider it necessary for every Russian to speak foreign languages. Russians have their own language and culture. To get acquainted with the achievements of other cultures, it is enough to have a relatively small number of translators. Anyone who really wants to, can independently (or in courses) master any language. This should not be an obligation. Since childhood, perceiving in the original a foreign culture, you can easily lose your own.
            1. Frankenstucker
              +1
              6 June 2015 21: 10
              Quote: yurta2015
              I don’t consider it necessary for every Russian to be fluent in foreign languages ​​... Since childhood, perceiving a foreign culture in the original, you can easily lose your own.

              Bravo. And - the logical ending:
              Quote: ASK505
              And there, and to the Maidan at hand.

              Are you guys confusing anything? Applied xenophobia or excuse for your own laziness?
              1. 0
                7 June 2015 03: 51
                Quote: Frankenstucker
                Are you guys confusing anything? Applied xenophobia or excuse for your own laziness?

                Or is it too lazy to move your brains? To make logical connections from the loss of one’s culture to the loss (through the Maidan) of one’s state sovereignty and state integrity is not so difficult as you think, although this requires knowledge of the fundamentals of logic.
        2. +1
          6 June 2015 15: 01
          And there, and to the Maidan at hand.
    2. Frankenstucker
      0
      6 June 2015 12: 27
      Quote: Saratoga833
      Why do our singers prefer English, speaking to a Russian audience, although the vast majority are not familiar with this language?

      I remembered: in the fourth year there was some kind of anniversary, or a red day of the calendar, or another attack of solidarity with Angela Davis, I don't remember - it was necessary to perform something anti-war in the language of an eventual adversary (after all !). We then sang Credence's Who'll stop the rain, anticipating, of course, with an entertainer about "lead showers", "no war" and other nonsense accompanied by the approving shaking of the cheeks of the institute's Komsomol hamsters. I must say, Fogerty would have been pleased, they played and sang heartily, like a hooligan. And then some well-wisherman told the hamsters that the song had nothing to do with denouncing imperialism, it was written in Woodstock, where children smoked weed and swingers flowers. What started here!)))))))))))
      1. Frankenstucker
        0
        6 June 2015 13: 39
        Quote: Frankenstucker
        remembered:

        haha, minus accept gratefully! laughing
    3. 0
      7 June 2015 11: 52
      absolutely correct. also jars me. especially regarding the middle name
  20. +8
    6 June 2015 10: 15
    The Russian language is magnificent - it is beautiful, rich, juicy and rich. Language is a weapon. A person who competently and masterfully speaks the language is capable of much, this is a third of success in life. With the help of language, we talk women. With the help of the language, we can clearly and clearly state our position and arguments on the production RAM or protect a business project. And if necessary, you can already send in Russian, so that the ears in the tube curl up and there will be nothing to argue.
    How interesting it is to communicate with a person who is fluent in language. It is like music, like a glass of spring water on a hot afternoon. And how sad it is to see that the interlocutor cannot connect the two words, or inserts a mate idly, not being able to replace him with other words.
    And all this comes from the family. Neither the school nor the institute can replace this, they can only contribute to this. And if inside, in the soul there is no such need, then external efforts will not help.
    And good shots from the movie in the topic.
  21. +1
    6 June 2015 10: 39
    Eastern wisdom says: If you want to conquer the enemy, raise his children. The fact that the Russian language is the basis of RUSSIAN Culture is beyond doubt. What I wrote in Russian with one letter s is not my innovation, but Dahl argued. That is, what to think about: who does it and for what purposes. There is also information that the letters not only had sounds, but also images. So they destroy our language for a long time, including the abbreviation of letters. But a person thinks in images, not letters. So our language is indeed the most complex and richest.
    1. Frankenstucker
      -1
      6 June 2015 11: 03
      Quote: andrei.yandex
      The fact that Russian language base RUSSIAN Culture - this is not in doubt.

      just like the fact that RUSSIAN is written with two "s"
      Quote: andrei.yandex
      So destroy our language for a long time

      laughing
      1. 0
        6 June 2015 15: 37
        Quote: Frankenstucker
        just like the fact that RUSSIAN is written with two "s"

        Judging by the cons, some experts and masters of Russian literature strongly disagree with this! negative
  22. +1
    6 June 2015 10: 47
    The preservation of the Russian language is the preservation of the Russian "I"

    It seems to me that "yo" is more relevant in our time.
  23. +2
    6 June 2015 11: 01
    Oh, and spring is lying. I open my son’s diary for grade 8. Pon Russian. Tue Russian, literature. Wed English. Thu Russian. Friday literature, English. Saturday Russian. For a week, 2 lessons of English, 4 lessons of the Russian language, 2 lessons of literature. Can deputies for schools where their children study, worry? Any language develops, and many words are borrowed from us. technical terms. sports, and the musical terms are entirely Italian.
    1. Frankenstucker
      -1
      6 June 2015 11: 17
      Quote: Free Wind
      and the musical terms are entirely Italian.

      there is also something for the confectioners and refiners to work on ... For example, replace "pizzicato" with "finger".

      In general, the choral lament for the Russian language, frankly, is not clear to me. I remember that at school our literature teacher denounced the linguistic experiments of the Silver Age with the same aplomb. Kruchenykh, Burliuk and Khlebnikov got the first number. There is, perhaps, the best method to interest)) And, of course, the next day, a good half of the class recited "At the request of the ladies, anointed my lips with my tail ..."
      1. +1
        6 June 2015 11: 43
        By the way, in the quote you quoted there is only one foreign word, and even then by that time it had almost become Russified.
      2. 0
        6 June 2015 13: 29
        What is the German doing here?
    2. +2
      6 June 2015 12: 01
      The question is not to borrow nothing at all. The problem is the unjustified borrowing of words of foreign languages, when there are their Russian counterparts. This has been happening very quickly in recent decades. There is a threat that in one or two generations, Russian youth will cease to understand a significant part of the language of Russian literature of the 19 and even the 20 of the century. You can laugh at the fact that Little Russian peasants in the 1918 year did not understand the orders of the UNR authorities written in the Ukrainian language, but something similar could happen with the Russian language if measures were not taken in time against its clogging.
  24. 0
    6 June 2015 11: 09
    I am proud that I am not just a “native speaker” of the Russian language, but I have never littered it and always demanded that my subordinates observe its purity. And not only in the investigative and judicial documentation, but also in communication with ANY contingent.
    1. -3
      6 June 2015 11: 44
      Quote: narval20
      And not only in the investigative and judicial documentation, but also in communication with ANY contingent.

      CONTINGENT will understand and weep with emotion ... lol
      1. +1
        6 June 2015 18: 57
        No one will let him cry. But it is necessary to conduct a dialogue in Russian, and not become like this evil spirits. If you noticed, it was a judicial / investigative work, not an operational search. :)
    2. -3
      6 June 2015 13: 21
      The court is the word foreign, Latin, one of the translations of the collection, veche. The contingent,, the English word, is translated as personnel. The document, the English word, is being translated, certified certificate. Subordinates, chin is a French word. Sorry do you speak Russian at all?
      1. +2
        6 June 2015 18: 53
        And in your opinion "to know" is to speak in Old Church Slavonic? We are talking about a conversation without "slang", obscenities and abuse.
      2. 0
        6 June 2015 18: 53
        And in your opinion "to know" is to speak in Old Church Slavonic? We are talking about a conversation without "slang", obscenities and abuse.
  25. Frankenstucker
    0
    6 June 2015 11: 59
    Quote: Bayonet
    Ile with a liberal in a cap!
    fellow


    laughing
    offset!
  26. Frankenstucker
    -2
    6 June 2015 12: 08
    Quote: Bayonet
    Quote: narval20
    And not only in the investigative and judicial documentation, but also in communication with ANY contingent.

    CONTINGENT will understand and weep with emotion ... lol

  27. +4
    6 June 2015 12: 40
    Russian. Born and raised in Central Asia. (Parents were sent to "work out", after graduation - by distribution.)

    When I was 15 we moved to the Tambov region. Local dialectisms, like "why" or "stupid" - instead of "stupid" were very annoying.

    And, one girl told me that, apparently, I - "not Russian". To my surprised question - why, an amazing answer was given: "Oh, you are all words, here you are - you say so!"

    When the word "like this," was done - movement of the hand with an open palm outward.

    Apparently, the girl wanted to say - "you speak too cleanly", but did not know how to formulate it. And it was in the early 80s, now in the last century.

    So, what kind of Russian language - I am completely calm. Borrowing foreign words?

    Do not give a damn - and forget!

    Yes, in the Great and Mighty, almost half of all words are borrowed! Well, who will now remember that the word "paper" is of purely Italian origin?

    The main thing is not words, not semantics, the main thing is syntax!

    And, our syntax is such that it will devour any foreign language. Gobble up - and not choke! Then - "digest", and - Russify.

    Moreover, it Russifies with a unique semantic connotation, as a result of which the language is only enriched.

    An example is Englishism: "manager" and Russified, scornfully derogatory from him: "manager".

    Here is the English language - really degraded. You read what was written in the last century before last and you are surprised - how much!

    But this is because in the XI century, the English language abandoned case endings, as a result of which the syntax - "froze in concrete", lost its flexibility and ability to develop.

    And, for the Great and Mighty - do not worry!
    1. Frankenstucker
      0
      6 June 2015 13: 07
      Quote: VSkilled
      And, for the Great and Mighty - do not worry!

      I agree completely.
    2. +2
      6 June 2015 15: 50
      I would rather come ... ZDA to everyone MANAGER am
    3. +2
      6 June 2015 18: 14
      Quote: VSkilled
      When I was 15 - we moved to Tambov. The local dialecticisms cut the ear very much

      Dialects in Russian have always been. They are, in fact, older than the language itself. The Russian literary language was formed on the basis of one of the dialects (Moscow). But what does borrowing from foreign languages ​​have to do with it?
      Quote: VSkilled
      Yes, in the Great and Mighty, almost half of all words are borrowed!

      Yes, borrowed, but the absolute majority of them were borrowed in the process of the birth of the language itself. Since the end of the formation of its literary form (mid-19th century), there are relatively few borrowings. This allows us today to read the books of Pushkin and Tolstoy without much effort. However, in recent decades, the contamination of the Russian language with foreign words and expressions (mostly in English) has sharply increased "thanks to" the dominance of mass culture of American origin and the increased introduction of the English language into the Russian environment. The result is a marked degradation of our own culture and language.
      1. 0
        7 June 2015 12: 07
        Exactly. It is not for nothing that Germany, Iran and other countries at different times fought against the dominance of foreign words, even invented their own synonyms. And again everything is "ok" instead of good, goalkeeper instead of goalkeeper, etc.
  28. -2
    6 June 2015 12: 43
    The ancient Slavonic LETTER - this is the basis of the revival of Russia and Rus.
    Study!
    And remember that THE LANGUAGE OF THE RUSSIANS IS IMPOSED - this is the source of the revival of the ORIGINS of our ancestors hi
    1. Frankenstucker
      -3
      6 June 2015 13: 18
      Quote: Savior the Great
      The ancient Slavonic LETTER - this is the basis of the revival of Russia and Rus.
      Study!


      why didn’t you write your comment in Church Slavonic? Revive the foundations ...
  29. 3vs
    +1
    6 June 2015 13: 33
    Alexander Sergeevich, happy holiday, and me too !!! drinks
  30. Antifascist77
    +3
    6 June 2015 14: 25
    Some went over today
  31. +7
    6 June 2015 14: 34
    Friends, today is the birthday of A.S. Pushkin! The main danger for the West, and they understand this very well, is the language of Pushkin, and Russian classical music, especially Sviridov, which is unofficially banned for public performance, for example, in Germany. That is, the Russian language and classical music naturally and without wars, by the Law of the time, simply break and absorb the artificial matrix of the West - the Market.
    Civilization Russia rests on three pillars - the idea of ​​justice, Pushkin and the Russian language. An attack on any of these components is an act of aggression, a blow to the foundations of Russian Civilization. How can one not recall at least a little about the Russian language from the classics. Gogol: “You marvel at the treasures of our language: no matter the sound, it’s a present: everything is grainy, large ...” F. I. Tyutchev: “. ... You are the best, future tenses Verb, and life, and enlightenment!” The Russian language is figurative and very strong. It is the only language in the world, both literary and colloquial. He will digest any language next to him. The German philosopher Spengler argued on this subject that after a millennium three or four languages ​​will remain on the planet. The main language of communication will be Russian. Pushkin is our everything! Everyone in the world happy birthday Pushkin!
    1. 0
      7 June 2015 10: 49
      Quote: ASK505
      The main danger for the West, and they understand it very well - is the language of Pushkin,

      What are you?!?! And I heard that there he is very much appreciated and respected!
  32. -4
    6 June 2015 14: 50
    Quote: Darkness
    But Wasserman believes that Ukrainian and Belarusian are dialects of the Russian language.

    WHAT DO YOU SAY !!! Wasserman is YES, a connoisseur and bearer of the great and mighty! Ukrainian and Belorussian course dialect. Only the Wassermans know what IS our language? And we know that vasermanov language is for us. Is he Chief?
    1. 0
      7 June 2015 10: 51
      Quote: andrian
      Only the Wassermans know what IS our language?

      And then there's the Wasserman reaction!
  33. +3
    6 June 2015 15: 47
    The preservation of the Russian language ..... somehow it sounds strange. It seems so - the preservation of his brain, the main task of the individual. But it is not clear to anyone that without a brain there is no person, as without a language there is no nation.

    Another question is the development of the Russian language, only now, as I visit various cities of the world, I see French schools, English, even Polish, but Russians are as rare as a unicorn. Everyone knows about him, but no one has seen.
    1. 0
      7 June 2015 03: 13
      Quote: Asadullah
      The preservation of the Russian language ..... somehow it sounds strange. It seems so - the preservation of his brain, the main task of the individual. But it is not clear to anyone that without a brain there is no person, as without a language there is no nation.

      That is why a person must take care of the health of his brain, and a nation - of the health of his tongue.
  34. +2
    6 June 2015 15: 48
    I raise a toast to our Great and Mighty RUSSIAN LANGUAGE! Singing, gentle, capacious, light, not to count epithets. May he delight the Russian man with his correctness and diversity, give him breadth of thought and scope for action, be constructive and creative, and frightening and formidable for our enemies! For the Russian word, Hurray! drinks
  35. -3
    6 June 2015 15: 53
    Fighting for the purity of the tongue is complete idiocy. For thousands of years, the Russian language absorbed foreign words, and nothing terrible happened. And national identity is in place, and we understand each other very well.
    1. Frankenstucker
      -1
      6 June 2015 20: 44
      Quote: Ivan_Anatolich
      Fighting for the purity of the tongue is complete idiocy. For thousands of years, the Russian language absorbed foreign words, and nothing terrible happened. And national identity is in place, and we understand each other very well.

      Ivan Anatolyevich -
      + 100!
      made a conclusion from the actively added comments: a patriot is one who constantly expresses concern, no matter what the subject touches, turns any topic to the Maidan and buries "libirasts". The topic of OC is no exception.
    2. 0
      7 June 2015 03: 28
      Quote: Ivan_Anatolich
      For thousands of years, the Russian language absorbed foreign words, and nothing terrible happened.

      The active displacement of Russian national culture by consumer goods of Anglo-American origin has been going on not for millennia, but only for the last 30-40 years. In the same years, there was a significant degradation of Russian education (especially the teaching of the Russian language, history, literature), and with it the language and culture. For many centuries since its inception, the Russian people in their bulk (with the exception of a small intellectual elite) practically did not feel the strong influence of foreign cultures and languages. Hence its centuries-old stability. But today the situation has changed, and Russian culture (and language) is in real danger of being absorbed into the mass Anglo-American culture, which has already virtually crushed the cultures of the peoples of Europe.
  36. +2
    6 June 2015 16: 13
    A good article, but there are omissions in it that blur the effect of the importance of the problem of the state and development of the Russian language.

    1. The author writes:
    "The most vivid picture we see in Little Russia (Ukraine), where about a hundred years ago, a significant part of the super-ethnos of the Russians (Russians) was recorded as" Ukrainians. "

    B questions arise in connection with this:
    a) about 100 years ago, is it in 1915 (or in 1914 or in 1916?), or when exactly?
    b) in connection with what and for what purpose the Russians were recorded as Ukrainians,
    c) who recorded and renamed Russians to Ukrainians
    d) how and by what methods this "Ukrainization" was carried out


    2. The author is concerned and writes:
    "The situation began to reach the point that in Russian schools, the study of the Russian language is given less time than the foreign language."

    It should be noted that in Bashkiria and Tatarstan (and elsewhere), in addition to the meager volume of hours in Russian, time is taken to study the national languages ​​of these republics, despite the protests of their parents (including Tatars and Bashkirs), which deprives young graduates poorly proficient in Russian, serious growth prospects even in Russia.
    But the author did not dare to mention it, because what if it turns out that he is "inciting" national hatred ...

    3. It should be said about our "elite", including about the big bosses and the creative intelligentsia. in the majority, they completely freely agreed to the role of servants of the oligarchs and the ruling stratum, constantly flickering on TV.
    They are issued by their Russian, so much so that Yesenin strongly expressed himself about such a long time ago.
    "And Klyuev, Ladoga deacon,
    His poems are like quilted jackets,
    But I read them out loud yesterday -
    And the canary died in the cage. "

    Well, the canary of course, sorry
    and Russians listening to such dead speeches are sorry even more ...
  37. VB
    +2
    6 June 2015 16: 20
    Smart, correct article-guide to action.
  38. 0
    6 June 2015 17: 33
    This is a good and rather interesting article. Since you have touched on the exam, I will add a little from myself. Firstly, every year our government thinks about how to complicate the examinations. For example, this year they introduced a compulsory essay and I was no exception, I had to The most interesting thing in this is that the essay was warned a couple of months in advance. Secondly, the teacher often told us about this: "Instead of improving the quality of education, the state is lowering the passing score in USE subjects." .Oh, what I do not envy the next graduates, every year it is more and more difficult.
  39. 0
    6 June 2015 17: 52
    Interesting article
  40. 0
    6 June 2015 18: 51
    many write about borrowings from other languages. only because there are different borrowings, such words as a loafer, a swivel skier how to count? words are foreign ones ..
    1. 0
      6 June 2015 19: 32
      This is to Zadornov, he loves such puzzles.
      1. +3
        6 June 2015 19: 53
        ball-skier-mon sher ami .. the French in 1812 asked to devour the villages .. the loafer-English laudeurs arranged the first park in Moscow for walks on the Sparrow Hills. But people who walked there called the loafers .. and now the words are Russian borrow.
  41. 0
    6 June 2015 19: 26
    Russian teacher in the lesson -
    "Whoever distorts and distorts the Russian Native Speech, I will beat him in the snout without unnecessary bazaars" smile
  42. 0
    6 June 2015 19: 36
    Yes, and probably a weekend
    1. +3
      6 June 2015 19: 41
      Quote: Barracuda
      and probably the weekend

  43. +1
    6 June 2015 19: 37
    The preservation of the Russian language is the preservation of the Russian "I"

    And the preservation of territories and the provision of work to their population - what is this?
    Transbaikalia gives China hundreds of thousands of hectares of agricultural land for 50 years
    http://www.rosbalt.ru/federal/2015/06/05/1405695.html

    But those who are for the guarantor and hurray hurray will find a "worthy" explanation for this.
    1. +1
      6 June 2015 20: 21
      Ivanovich, With such success you can read and watch ukROSMI. Nobody, as far as I know, gives the Russian fellow countryman.
  44. 0
    6 June 2015 20: 17
    Mighty RUSSIAN LANGUAGE! What a play on words, remember that same dilemma as that ignoramus from the cartoon, “You can't be pardoned.” But there’s just a comma, where to put it, but how much it has under it.
  45. The comment was deleted.
  46. The comment was deleted.
  47. The comment was deleted.
  48. +2
    6 June 2015 20: 38
    Quote: VSkilled
    Born and raised in Central Asia. (Parents were sent to "work off", after graduation - by distribution.)

    When I was 15 we moved to the Tambov region. Local dialectisms, like "why" or "stupid" - instead of "stupid" were very annoying.

    And, one girl told me that, apparently, I - "not Russian". To my surprised question - why, an amazing answer was given: "Oh, you are all words, here you are - you say so!"

    When the word "like this," was done - movement of the hand with an open palm outward.

    Apparently, the girl wanted to say - "you speak too cleanly", but did not know how to formulate it. And it was in the early 80s, now in the last century.


    By the way, according to my observations, at least in Kazakhstan, where I was born and raised, one of the purest versions of the Russian language. I think this is due to the fact that he was studied in schools with a strong teaching staff.
    I went to the army for conscripts from Karakalpakstan and, the funny thing is, out of 75 - 80 people traveling in my car, only five knew Russian well. However, among them, the best speaker was Russian, Korean. The rest had some kind of specific dialect, in the nose, somehow.
    And further. I served with the Vyatichi (residents of Kirov), how great it was for me to listen to them. there was in them, something primordial, "it is condovye, poskonnoe" (Golden calf)))). I really liked the way they greeted. They said - Is it okay with you and this, with such an intonation ... Straight, something, from the depths of centuries.
  49. 0
    6 June 2015 20: 45
    Quote: ASK505
    For 300 years, only about 50 words: a hat, a horse, a shoe, a bald, an iron, a cockroach, a booth, etc. It is not much, but they have become ours.

    What makes you think that the lexicon of the Russian language contains only 50 words of Turkic origin? There are many more.
    1. +2
      6 June 2015 20: 58
      And then the Turks were Russian, they spoke without translators. And why are the loopholes of the Chinese wall looking toward China? what I was there, tourists are not allowed. Like the Chinese pyramids.
  50. The comment was deleted.
  51. -1
    6 June 2015 21: 51
    I am not Russian, but I know the Old Russian dictionary - az, beeches, vedi, verb, Dobro, etc. Sounds great! And you need to study well at school so that you don’t feel ashamed later.
  52. +1
    6 June 2015 22: 07
    The Judaizers have a detrimental influence on the Great and Mighty Russian language; they distort and destroy our native language! They invade education, like harmful cells into the body, and begin to cause mischief, while flaunting their intelligence, but in fact they are zeros! am The Yavrei system of teaching the Russian language kills brain cells! This is, unfortunately, an irrefutable fact!
  53. Houston
    0
    7 June 2015 17: 50
    Quote: Houston
    Quote: Alex rus
    This is especially clearly seen in the media such as RBC and Rain, it seems that you watch foreign channels, you learn so many words. And then it turns out that they are easily translated into Russian.

    Especially for people like you, there are channels like Life News and Russia Today. Look at them. There, for people like you, everything is laid out on the shelves.
    Why the hell did you bother with intellectuals?

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"