China studies Su-25UTG received from Ukraine

18
China studies Su-25UTG received from Ukraine


One of the Malaysian media recently published material according to which in 2007, China received from Ukraine a deck training aircraft Su-25UTG. The article states that this transaction was recorded in the UN Register of Conventional Arms.

Su-25UTG was created in 1984 and is designed to train deck pilots aviation. The aircraft was developed on the basis of the combat trainer Su-25UB. The base aircraft is a two-seat attack aircraft, in contrast to it, the Su-25UTG is a “clean” training machine. There are no military equipment on board the Su-25UTG, in particular, the guidance system weapons and communications systems with ground forces.

The article suggests that China acquired the Su-25UTG not as a museum piece or to decorate a casino. China is studying this aircraft in order to create its own carrier-based training aircraft.

In Ukraine, in Saki (Crimea peninsula) there is a pilot aviation pilot training center. Ukraine offered China to use this object to train its ship pilots. This proposal did not please Russia, which in 2011, initiated the construction of its own training center of a similar direction. Representatives of the Russian Navy said that the joint use of the center in Saki by Russian and Chinese pilots would cause "great inconvenience."
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

18 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Sergh
    0
    14 October 2011 09: 11
    It’s time for the Chinese to sell plasticine equipment so that the silky handles do not climb anywhere.
    1. Ivan35
      +1
      14 October 2011 18: 23
      I would not want one day the clones of these Su 25 to storm my city - Alma-Ata
      Although China and our "temporary ally" are against the pendos, we must stop the leakage of technology to them
  2. +5
    14 October 2011 09: 24
    Well, the Tu-160 was taken away from them on time for debts, otherwise they would have already been in Beijing ...
    1. Bogatir
      -9
      14 October 2011 14: 18
      Quote: Vadivak
      Good Tu-160 on time they took away their debts

      - "taken" is not the right word - they gave how much they counted.
      Quote: Vadivak
      otherwise they would have already been in Beijing ...

      - I’m useless for you from the Tu-160 - when you have 4 flying, and you can’t build more for yourself ...
      1. +1
        14 October 2011 16: 36
        What have you built for yourself?
      2. +3
        14 October 2011 16: 42
        What did you build for yourself? Besides developed nationalism?

        Wuxi people brothers. Ale Muscovites, Poles, Magyars, Rumunis and Zhids are the heaps of our people.
        1. svvaulsh
          +1
          14 October 2011 16: 49
          That don’t wreak respect on the whole evil!
      3. SAVA555.IVANOV
        +1
        14 October 2011 20: 38
        Bogatir THE WORD "" IS EXACTLY NOT UGRO-MONGOL))) SO LEAVE THIS ARGUMENT IN YOUR HEAD AS AN ACQUIRED LESSON)))
      4. vadimus
        0
        15 October 2011 02: 12
        ugh on you! What overcoats do such nits get out of?
  3. kesa1111
    +8
    14 October 2011 10: 13
    China has no attack aircraft. Thanks to the brothers Ukrainians will be soon.
    1. +2
      14 October 2011 10: 32
      these masters only give in hand, copy everything that is possible and impossible
      MERSIS TO BROTHERS SLAVES
      1. Sergh
        +1
        14 October 2011 12: 24
        Yes, of course, probably already all over the screws, the nails were dismantled, the newspaper was spread out on the floor and crawled on a rack with a ruler, the wheels were measured, the paint was scratched off with a fingernail. Kravososy damn, like leeches sucked.
        1. Bogatir
          -1
          14 October 2011 14: 28
          Su-25 to the Chinese as a demonstrator - what for is needed.
      2. Bogatir
        -1
        14 October 2011 14: 24
        Brothers Chinese and Ukrainians of the BKZ intermediaries directly - a lot of things.
        1. +2
          14 October 2011 15: 42
          Forgot another Georgian brothers to mention, you’ve already done a lot with them
          1. Bogatir
            -1
            14 October 2011 15: 48
            Yes, Georgians are also brothers, and even Orthodox. This is the Ugro-Mongol - Caucasian brothers by blood and faith.
            But in general - from your historical squalor and world loneliness, collapse and decline - it’s not even funny ...
        2. +4
          14 October 2011 17: 11
          Damn again, this is a miracle-hero! Gentlemen, you are being fooled by the provocation of this eccentric.
    2. Bogatir
      -2
      14 October 2011 14: 21
      Quote: kesa1111
      China has no attack aircraft. WITH

      - The Tambov comrade - stormtroopers from China heaps. And thanks to Ukraine, a new one will soon appear:
  4. SAVA555.IVANOV
    0
    14 October 2011 13: 40
    HANDONES HORSE !!!!!! WHAT TO TAKE FROM THEM TRADERS, FORGIVEN THE BROTHERS!? I would not have sold anything to the Chinese. HERE A BRIGHT EXAMPLE THAT AUTHORITY ANYTHING CREATIVE CREATURE
    1. Bogatir
      -1
      14 October 2011 14: 32
      Quote: SAVA555.IVANOV
      HANDONES HORSE !!!!!!

      - Let’s do without the original Ugrian-Mongolian dialects, otherwise I don’t understand them well by your self-critics.
      Quote: SAVA555.IVANOV
      WHAT TO TAKE FROM THEM

      - This friend forgot who started to merge into China then - Russia.
      Quote: SAVA555.IVANOV
      I would not have sold anything to the Chinese. HERE A BRIGHT EXAMPLE THAT AUTHORITY ANYTHING CREATIVE CREATURE

      - So the Russian Federation began to stamp the most modern fighter in China in version 27SK, then they sold a lot of technology for ships, air defense systems, torpedoes, airborne defense systems, aircraft carriers ...
      And although it’s understandable - they will throw you out as intermediaries - but it’s logical ... smile
  5. SIA
    SIA
    0
    14 October 2011 14: 01
    There are no military equipment on board the Su-25UTG, in particular, weapon guidance systems and communication systems with ground forces.

    Well, how long to attach?
    1. Bogatir
      0
      14 October 2011 14: 34
      Quote: SVV
      Well, how long to attach?

      What for? China needs a chassis, maybe a phisher option and something else.
      1. 0
        14 October 2011 17: 14
        I put you the pros everywhere. Break off.
  6. mitrich
    +3
    14 October 2011 17: 21
    It would be so simple, the Chinese would have already equipped the base on the Moon ...
    To get at its disposal an industrial product does not mean to master the technology of its production.

    The Chinese themselves are an example of this. The attempt to clone the Su-27 ended with the release of something Chinese there, significantly inferior in its performance characteristics to the Russian machine.
    1. raf
      -2
      14 October 2011 17: 36
      You are right mitrih, it is not enough to have a sample in front of you, you still need to organize production, select the right materials and much much more!
    2. 0
      14 October 2011 23: 58
      Quote: mitrich
      To get at its disposal an industrial product does not mean to master the technology of its production.

      Of course, they didn’t get the technology, but for a penny in Ukraine they got all the design decisions that cost not a lot of work and money. That they will greatly advance in time in creating their own training machine.
    3. 0
      15 October 2011 00: 05
      and in-29 turned into that-4 = who is better?
  7. jamert
    +2
    14 October 2011 18: 14
    Well, Ukraine does not need a deck aircraft. Where to start? We will never have aircraft carriers - we would build corvettes. So it’s better to sell it to someone so that it does not rust. In the end, if the Russian authorities took care of preserving the technology, they would have bought it for gas debts, like the TU-160 and the end.
  8. escobar
    +1
    14 October 2011 21: 43
    The Su-25UTG was created in 1984. With the union, well, whose intellectual property is it. All oblique fighter aircraft based on the Su-27 are mastirim themselves.
  9. Pol
    +1
    15 October 2011 02: 26
    If the state wishes, not a single louse will jump over the cardon.
    The Chinese, with their grandmothers, can buy everything .... What will they allow !!!!
    I’m starting to love Stalin more and more .....
  10. Garik647
    -1
    27 December 2011 12: 58
    Friends, do not think of old stereotypes like that Chinese is something fake, like fake tracksuits and sneakers. These "friends" (yet!) Are not at all as naive and "stupid" as some people think. They, unlike us today (I hope this is a temporary phenomenon), are developing their scientific and military potential by leaps and bounds, not disdaining the theft (if possible) of technology and knowledge. Yes, they themselves do not pull with their brains now, but the fact that they can have a breakthrough in technology is obvious, because they do not spare money! They are stubborn to the point! Even 20 years ago, in terms of technological development, they were in a deep well ..., and now it is the best economy in the world. Well, you cannot give them military technologies and developments, even from yesterday! Otherwise, in 5-10 years it will be the second (and maybe the first) sea power. And we, with our Serdyukovs, Makarovs and a sweet couple, will continue to "successfully modernize" the army, selling all the best over the hill, and leaving for ourselves what other countries refuse (this is at best), or one by one to supply new products a year and shout all over the country about "large-scale re-equipment". China needs time, and not too distant, in order to completely dominate in the east and beyond. And given the fact that they are constantly looking at the "northern uninhabited and undeveloped" territories, the conclusion is obvious ...

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"