Right to aggression

63
Right to aggression
The US and NATO are slowly preparing for a full-scale intervention in Russia.

1. Identified areas of concentration of troops: the Baltic States, Ukraine, possibly Georgia.

2. The directions of the main and auxiliary strikes were chosen: from Lithuania and Poland to the Kaliningrad region, from Latvia, Estonia the main blow to Moscow, auxiliary to Leningrad. From Narva to Leningrad kilometers 150.

In the direction of Leningrad from Estonia are quite expensive, suitable for wheeled vehicles. This will be the direction of the auxiliary strike. What else is convenient for the Baltic states - the developed port and railway networks make it possible to accumulate and store huge stocks of military equipment necessary for the next campaign in Russia and quickly transfer it to various directions. On matters of logistics and logistics, Americans are world champions.

3. It’s harder with Moscow, because The Pskov and Novgorod regions, as they were 75 years ago a bearish corner, have remained. A decent grouping through the Pskov-Novgorod-Tver taiga will quickly be difficult to smuggle. But even here, with logistics and supply, the Americans will help, as with military planning, aviation, parts of electronic warfare and MTO, etc.

4. But to help the northern grouping will be used the strongest and in terms of armament, size and motivation, the Ukrainian grouping concentrated in the deaf and Shostkino forests. There are such forests there, that the whole Chinese army can be hidden, and even the Ukrainian military strength is about half a million - all the more. It seems to me that the Americans will not trust the Ukrainians with questions of material supplies, logistics, transport and logistics, and again they will provide everything on their own. Painfully serious these are questions. Concerning the possible half-million grouping of the Ukrainian army, do you think - bust? Well maybe a little bit. Another couple of years of indigent poverty in Ukraine, and every second man, from those who could not afford to dump out of the “read Nenka” and with brains completely zazombirovannyh ukropaganda, will consider it his duty and honor to go to Moscow for zipoons. And the mobilization resource of the thirty millionth of Ukraine is more than a million potential soldiers.

Of course, half a million soldiers must be dressed, shod, fed, armed, taught to fight, provide sergeants and officers. And this question in a couple of years will be resolved by calling in reservists who had previously passed through the war in Donbas and who have experience of participating in hostilities. Whatever you may say, even forced mobilization may ultimately bring potential benefits. And they will be called a month before the start of the offensive. This time is quite enough to form parts and divisions, to carry out elementary coordination and not to have time to sleep and decompose.

Let me remind you that from the checkpoint "Bachivsk" to Moscow about 520 km.

So, from the South and the North-West to the Moscow area in the converging directions of Euroopeits and those who joined them, armed with American technology, technology, aviation, control systems and suppression, centuries-old hatred of Russia, supplied by the Americans to meet each other move "civilizers".

5. Along the way, as I mentioned above, from Lithuania and Poland, they are convinced that the Old Man’s army will confine itself to demonstrating activity and closing the skies for the planes of the countries of the anti-Russian coalition (not really necessary!) And under the pretext of the need to protect the Polesie direction from aggression from Ukraine, concentrated between Brest and Mazyr, proud Polish and Lithuanian gentlemen raised their proud heads attack the small Kaliningrad enclave, completely isolated at that time fleet NATO and interrupted air and rail links with Greater Russia.

Kaliningrad region will be left to itself. "Iskander" is unlikely to help. There would be a small, but modern coastal zone rocket fleet that could discourage the blocking of the Baltic between Kaliningrad and Leningrad. But alas. For a couple of years, such a fleet will not appear. It would be nice to have in the Kaliningrad region a system of fortified areas like those that Hitler had in East Prussia in the 1944 year. But the old defenses were blown up, and the new ones, naturally, were not built.

6. The reason for the start of a big war is likely to be an ultimatum of Ukraine or the United States with NATO to return the Crimea or the next round of conflict in the Donbas not resolved by that time. Yes, only to the Crimea, Ukrainians will be the last to go.

To their American lenders, the Crimea is not needed for the satisfaction of Square vanity. Crimea is so. Consolation prize for good behavior and cannon fodder, and even then, certainly with reservations.

They need everything. They need to finally destroy Russia as an empire, as a factor of world and European politics. Dismembering and subjugating the weaker parts of the richest country in the world - this is the task of the Anglo-Saxons and Europeans and their blue dream for the past three hundred years.

Will the path of civilizers and those who joined them among the Young Europeans and all the candidates for candidates in Russia be littered with roses? We must ask Napoleon and Hitler.

But we will not find it enough.

According to the old Russian habit, we are not ready for war. But still win. Again we wash krovushkoy, but we will win. And again we will restore everything at our own expense, and the profits will be calculated in London and New York.

So, maybe, while there is still time, do not wait for a passive blow on the face of a presumptuous bully?

Maybe you should not let the snakes quietly crawl in the bosom, and give the enemy a close distance with a knife?

If we are sure that aggression is already being committed against us, then we have the right to defend ourselves without reading the full text of the article on the right to the necessary self-defense for a drunken and arrogant rapist.

If there is a right to aggression in the world, then why did we voluntarily deprive ourselves of this right, while others use it right and left?

Why do we perform voluntary castration after the wedding night?

We have the right to aggression.

Written on the shore of the blue Azov Sea, three kilometers from the ruins of the village of Shyrokino.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

63 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +44
    1 June 2015 07: 53
    What was it? what
    1. +40
      1 June 2015 08: 05
      Probably one of these))))
      1. +1
        1 June 2015 11: 09
        Even a Teflon seat will not save from such ignition. The entire missile reserve is used in one gulp.
    2. +35
      1 June 2015 08: 08
      Quote: retired
      What was it? what

      Rave). There will be no full-scale war. There will be attempts to blow up the country from the inside out, while simultaneously fomenting and supporting conflicts on the borders. They will only enter troops if they are sure that they have nothing to fear. If some dandruff comes to power like a Misha 2 percent or Hodor.
      1. +7
        1 June 2015 14: 09
        Quote: Mitek
        Rave). There will be no full-scale war. There will be attempts to blow up the country from the inside,

        Trust in God, but do not make a mistake yourself. Gunpowder must always be kept dry, and the army ready for any scenario. Before the Second World War, some people also shouted, "We'll throw a German with our hats," "only a madman can attack us," and a German got to Moscow, barely stopped.
        Of course, the scenario described in the article is unlikely, as modern wars are somewhat different, but the wars themselves have not been canceled. For example, who thought a couple of years ago that Kiev would bomb the Donbass?
        The most unforgivable stupidity is to underestimate the enemy.
      2. ivan.ru
        -1
        1 June 2015 15: 41
        "They will send troops only if they are sure that they have nothing to fear."

        here it is, and I'm talking about it. first they will knock everything out with missiles and bombs, and then troops will be brought in
      3. The comment was deleted.
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. +1
      1 June 2015 08: 57
      It is written like "blue eye" ... and not on the blue Azov Sea, nonsense ..
    5. +10
      1 June 2015 09: 03
      Quote: retired
      What was it?

      delirium fever.

      6. The reason for starting a big war is likely to be the ultimatum of Ukraine or the United States with NATO ...

      "You write, write. Then slip it under the door of the ward, the orderlies will pick up ..." (c)
    6. 0
      1 June 2015 10: 48
      There is a good film. And there was a war tomorrow!
      1. 0
        1 June 2015 12: 02
        Quote: GradusHuK
        There is a good film. And there was a war tomorrow!

        So what? Does this justify copyright paranoia?
    7. +1
      1 June 2015 11: 12
      Nothing surprising. The man sat at his leisure, leafed through the GUGL, found an article about Operation Barbarossa and decided to be smart. And the most important thing was done to convince everyone that there are only stupid and boobies in the NATO General Staff) )))
    8. +1
      1 June 2015 11: 39
      As I understand it, a call to war, or something! It’s already taken down the roof ???
    9. +5
      1 June 2015 12: 52
      What it was is a distant analysis of the activities of our rulers' cowards. If they quietly surrender the DPR and LPR, destroying the field commanders popular with the militia and giving power to the schnicks who agree to be "together" with Dill after thousands of deaths, if we still count the United States and Geyropa " friends and partners "if measures are still not taken to detain and punish people who organize sabotage and sabotage at strategic enterprises, if thieves are still in our power and do not sit in jail, if we are responsible for every spit of any mongrel excuses with repentance and beating ourselves in the chest, then the same will happen in a dashing time for the country, they will sell and surrender everything, just grab and dump. And we, especially the young, who believe everything, will have to again, as in times of it take caramults and go into the woods.
    10. +3
      1 June 2015 12: 57
      Quote: retired
      What was it?

      Whatever it is, but those mobilized a year ago in the Armed Forces of Ukraine are now returning home ... and are preparing for the August call ... Why would it be?
    11. 0
      2 June 2015 05: 35
      He also forgot about Finland, which began to forget something about the terms of the 1944 peace treaty - it’s time to remind.
      And about Alaska, which has long been slaves to return.
      http://lurkmore.to/Ту-160 belay
  2. +21
    1 June 2015 07: 55
    There will be no full-scale land war, their gut is thin
    There will be provocations and attempts to blow up the country from the inside.
    Anglo-Saxons and Jews are patient and plan for many decades to come. They will wait for a suitable case, and now there are injections from all sides, as a check for Russia's weaknesses.
    1. +3
      1 June 2015 10: 35
      Quote: viktorrymar
      Anglo-Saxons and Jews are patient and plan for many decades to come.


      Well, what patience you need to have! We once had "the next generation of Soviet people will live under communism." And they built that very communism. So it was all in the foreseeable future and for a single, individual country. And here - a freak show, damn it! They are not able to plan for themselves for the next 5 years, but plan on a geopolitical scale for a century! Does he live badly in America now? I will not compare anyone with anyone, but they, ordinary Americans, really live well now - they are happy with everything, they have only enough. So why even more? Is this a sport or a disease? To plan a strategic task even 20 years in advance is utopia. And, especially, at 50-70. They there, in America, do not know what their left leg will want in a week, and here - decades! Who in 1932 could have guessed that the Anglo-Saxon money would make the Fuhrer A. Hitler out of a modest loser artist A. Schicklgruber? Who in 1980 could have guessed that the Talibans would grow out of American fosterlings in Pak? Who in 1985 could have imagined that in Afghanistan, from a "devoted to the ideals of democracy", raised not just by America, but by the Bush family, Bin Laden would grow up? I am completely silent about the "Arab Spring" and ISIS - America again, something went wrong ... Traditionally. So why are they so confident in their genius that they believe that now they are lucky and everything will develop as they plan for decades to come? I still think that I will see what will happen to the American financial system in the next 5-10 years. They don’t like to talk about their duty, but on the contrary, I like to talk about American default. And there we’ll talk for the prospect ...

      When a 10-year-old neighbor boy says that he will be the director of Gazprom, and my grandson, his age, says that he will go to the army to serve in the Airborne Forces, and after the urgent will go to a military school - I believe the 10-year-old boys more, because their plans are more real than American strategies ...

      And let America plan. But they will not have unemployment in the strategic planning departments ... laughing As the saying goes, if the plan is good, so the plans of the party become the plans of the people. (Ukrainian political humor)
    2. +1
      1 June 2015 12: 24
      I'm joking soon. You’ll wash yourself with your blood - don’t go to a fortuneteller!
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. ivan.ru
      +1
      1 June 2015 15: 51
      "Anglo-Saxons and Jews are patient and plan for many decades to come"
      these decades have passed, a suitable case has come, it's time to start
      "There will be no full-scale land war."
      will not, of course. there will be no war for which our generals are preparing, with thousands of tanks, hundreds of thousands of soldiers, thousands of kilometers of trenches. there will be something similar to the bombing of Yugoslavia, of course, on a different scale, but with the same purpose, to bomb in the Stone Age. followed by a tough sweep, with the hands of brothers and bros, right up to the genocide. he is once again silent, public opinion is shut up, all the laws and norms of war will be redone, and forth.
  3. +10
    1 June 2015 07: 58
    The directions of the main and auxiliary strikes were selected: from Lithuania and Poland to the Kaliningrad region, from Latvia, Estonia the main blow to Moscow, the auxiliary to Leningrad. From Narva to Leningrad, 150 kilometers.

    The author nevertheless confused the tactics of warfare in the forties of the last century with modern conditions. Who will now invade the territory of Russia by ground forces, even with the support of aviation and tactical missiles? It’s one thing to ring Russia with missile defense bases and means, it’s another thing to attack Moscow.
    1. +6
      1 June 2015 08: 16
      He did not confuse, he just has nothing to offer especially shy citizens.
      After all, it is written as if there is absolutely NO ARMY in Russia and there will be no opposition.
      Of course it won't!
      Because NATO is more likely to gain hope than to send ground troops to Russia, and the troops will probably refuse to carry out such an order.
      And pravosekah and pshekam - welcome to the Russian land, they had few losses in the Donbass?
      So there will be total extermination!
      But after that even the name "Ukraine" will be erased from the political map of the world.
      1. +2
        1 June 2015 09: 33
        Quote: hydrox
        He did not confuse, he just has nothing to offer especially shy citizens.

        how - "nothing" ????
        And buy salt-matches-kerosene ????
        it's time, it's time ....
      2. +1
        1 June 2015 10: 46
        Quote: hydrox
        Because NATO is more likely to gain hope than to send ground troops to Russia, and the troops will most likely refuse such an order.

        In any normal army in the world, refusal to execute an order is a tribunal.

        In the American army, probably, democracy - the commander sends you on the offensive, and you send him tries ... But they don’t choose commanders there by voting?
        1. +2
          1 June 2015 11: 36
          Quote: Zoldat_A
          In any normal army in the world, refusal to execute an order is a tribunal.

          Minusators are unhappy that orders are appealed only after execution (see Disciplinary Charter)? Then welcome to the army - they know how to kick liberalism out of the brain.
          1. +2
            1 June 2015 12: 50
            Quote: Zoldat_A
            Are minusers unhappy that orders are appealed only after execution (see the Disciplinary Charter)?

            I also did not understand the minuses to your comment. And this is a thoughtful remark
            Quote: hydrox
            and the troops will surely refuse to carry out such an order.
            plus enthusiastically. It’s strange.
      3. The comment was deleted.
      4. ivan.ru
        +3
        1 June 2015 16: 04
        every time the ura-patriots, before and at the very beginning of the war, start shouting and we will throw our caps over these narrow-eyed monkeys (NATO will be more secure than send ground troops to Russia), or the German proletariat will soon rebel against Hitler (the troops they will probably refuse to carry out such an order) - the army and the people raked in full. the war that begins will not be a war to conquer territory and resources, it will be a war to destroy the people, the population, followed by the quiet exploitation of resources. Russian - no one pity, even in Russia. Americans with the Euroreich are pouting with all their might - in order to destroy everyone at one time, they will stop at nothing
  4. +8
    1 June 2015 08: 03
    I join the "pensioner" (so far only in the opinion laughing ): "Did the designer smoke?"
  5. +3
    1 June 2015 08: 03
    Europe is like a suicide scare Russia by jumping from the roof.
  6. +6
    1 June 2015 08: 03
    Interesting plan for an author from the NATO Secretariat
    sent or from the Pentagon?
    1. +3
      1 June 2015 08: 15
      They treated him with an Afghan plan. Here is a violent fantasy in man.
    2. 0
      1 June 2015 09: 54
      Quote: shax
      Interesting plan for an author from the NATO Secretariat
      sent or from the Pentagon?

      No, the peddlers accidentally threw it into the mailbox with an advertisement for Pyaterochka.
    3. 0
      1 June 2015 12: 54
      Quote: shax
      Interesting plan for an author from the NATO Secretariat
      sent or from the Pentagon?


      From a parallel universe, via telepathic communication.
  7. +3
    1 June 2015 08: 04
    The author completely forgot about such a deterrent as nuclear weapons! And it cools the Western "hotheads" very qualitatively.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. ivan.ru
      +2
      1 June 2015 16: 18
      To apply nuclear weapons at the right time, you need to have the will, and access to the suitcase. are you sure that Putin will have a similar will? or similar access? or what will be Putin then? a preventive non-nuclear strike can remove the mbr, or at least make it difficult to launch, and a lovingly fed European will destroy these rackets even before entering a ballistic trajectory. Yes, and after, there is something to drop them. so this is not a panacea
  8. +8
    1 June 2015 08: 08
    But in my opinion, the author has played in tanks, and now on his knees he is drawing a barberry plan for Batman, Winnie the Pooh and the Eeyore donkey
  9. +11
    1 June 2015 08: 08
    Long time ago I didn’t read such a noble nonsense! wink
    1. +1
      1 June 2015 11: 05
      In-in! And in our General Staff, apparently, the handkerchiefs wet from tears are already tired of wringing ... crying
      Well, they only know how to click seeds wink And the author is the Great Strategist. Where are we to him fool
  10. +4
    1 June 2015 08: 09
    The gut is thin in all this geyvoystva, Russia-this is not an African or Ukrainian safari for you, we’ll bother to London and Lisbon at least ....
  11. +5
    1 June 2015 08: 14
    I propose, in the event of a repetition of one of the scenarios of the past, to be safe from future intrusions. How? Elementary, comrades: complete utilization of the threat. Underground Without exception. By the way, there will be no one to scream how this is done today. Does it need us to lose millions of normal living people every time? Think ...
  12. +2
    1 June 2015 08: 16
    Et Th, an alternative history of World 3?
    1. +3
      1 June 2015 09: 14
      Quote: Balu
      Et Th, an alternative history of World 3?

      ... and they will retreat along the old Smolensk road. In the winter.
  13. +7
    1 June 2015 08: 17
    Blow to Moscow ??? Half a million NATO soldiers and a million Ukrainians ??? :)))
    Guys having a vodka hangover on Monday morning was a bad idea.
    1. +5
      1 June 2015 08: 52
      Reich for the first strike concentrated almost 6 million personnel on the border. Despite the fact that the USSR did not even begin to deploy troops. Half a million against Hussein, with total air superiority, and then, as a result, the generals simply sold it. Especially Iraq not RF. The author of the daub is not something that does not whack in the subject, he still does not know the story.
    2. Shabay62
      +3
      1 June 2015 08: 53
      Quote: RiverVV
      Blow to Moscow ??? Half a million NATO soldiers and a million Ukrainians ??? :)))
      Guys having a vodka hangover on Monday morning was a bad idea.

      Yesterday was an Orthodox holiday, Trinity, so know after yesterday, wedge. You need to drink less. Or more. So that you can’t bring nonsense. hi Or maybe it’s a matter of smoking?
  14. -3
    1 June 2015 08: 19
    Who is this? Utter nonsense, the Strugatsky read!
    1. +6
      1 June 2015 08: 42
      Quote: Posya10rus
      Strugatsky read!


      Here "minus" in the hearts, do not humiliate the Strugatskys!
      After all, they explained to you, smoked afftortor, smoked .. am
      1. +1
        1 June 2015 09: 27
        Quote: skifd
        Here "minus" in the hearts, do not humiliate the Strugatskys!

        has joined.
  15. -1
    1 June 2015 08: 24
    Nonsense. What did the author smoke?
    1. +2
      1 June 2015 09: 35
      Quote: Astronom
      What did the author smoke?

      yes it’s better if I smoked, you see that a thread would have been more fun to catch. And so ....
  16. +3
    1 June 2015 08: 24
    And since when did sun dill suddenly become the strongest? The author does not call Dmitri Tymchuk a case?
  17. -9
    1 June 2015 08: 25
    Half of those who spoke above, holding the machine gun in their hands, will think - pull the trigger or not pull, or maybe it itself ... Not about the author, you need to talk.
    1. +7
      1 June 2015 08: 33
      Judging by the non-combat banner, you, dear of these same? Don’t be afraid, we’ll press, in any case, I pressed 2,5 years in Afghanistan, and now I won’t miss
      1. 0
        2 June 2015 11: 19
        It's not about the banner. Alas, in these penates, they do not include Tricolor, because it’s not on the couch. And my comment was not against the fighters, but against cap-hatred on this topic. Remember the 41st, Afghan!

        Go ahead, with the minuses to the advantage!
    2. +4
      1 June 2015 09: 00
      Quote: Navigator2013
      will think - pull the trigger or not pull

      Someone? ))) I bet that I won’t think about it? feel
  18. +1
    1 June 2015 08: 30
    From an article a mile away he pulls liberals and a schiz.
  19. +5
    1 June 2015 08: 38
    Something like that, what was it at all? Tovarisch! You at least follow the news of the little ones. I especially liked the pearl about the "highly motivated Ukrainian army". Fell under the table.
  20. +1
    1 June 2015 08: 38
    Not a damn thing, the champion’s tutul is taken away from the kaklov.
  21. +2
    1 June 2015 08: 40
    It's monday already. The author needs a hangover and goes to bed.
  22. +8
    1 June 2015 08: 42
    The author, and what did you smoke today, I also want this!
    It seems to the author that the Baltic States are an excellent springboard for an attack on Moscow and Leningrad. And to me it seems like a wonderful and ready-made boiler. Which can be "heated" from all sides. And at the same time, it was shot through the entire depth of the OTRK, and closed from the air with the help of the SAM. Access to the sea will not help either, we still have enough TU-22 to help the Baltic Fleet drive NATO ships off the coast. The old man is not stupid, he understands that he will live without Russia as long as Gaddafi in 2011. So the Belarusians will fight in full in this case. In such a situation, if NATO drives a large grouping into the Baltic states, we will have nothing more to wish for. Ukrogenerals with their Izvarin and Debaltsev will howl with envy towards their NATO colleagues.
    Regarding the half-million ukroarmii - this, excuse me, is a clinic, they can’t arm a hundred thousand normally. It also seemed to me from the text that the Young Europeans would conquer us, because the Americans, as indicated, would carry out logistics. Well, then I'm generally calm. There will be enough Batkino troops and New Russia. The author, we teach materiel, at least on Wikipedia, if it’s really too lazy to climb the Web.
    1. +3
      1 June 2015 12: 35
      Despite the aggressiveness of the West, led by the USG, not one will climb into us with the traditional land war. Well, they didn’t move with their minds!
      Throw rockets from afar - yes, this is their method. But we, too, are able to, and therefore will not.
      Well, a land invasion, even with the support of the aviation and navy, is already completely out of the realm of fantasy.
      ISIS can still be capable of this, NATO - not a damn thing.
  23. The comment was deleted.
  24. +8
    1 June 2015 08: 50
    The author is a victim of the exam.
    1. +2
      1 June 2015 09: 39
      Quote: hydrox
      But after that even the name "Ukraine" will be erased from the political map of the world.

      I am afraid that not only Ukraine, but also Poland, the entire Baltic region and a whole series of countries, including the main US states, as well as many of our regions in the event of aggression, will exist only as geographical concepts and lifeless radioactive deserts.
      And NATO is well aware of this, so there can be no real war, no real invasion of our territory - this is just a sophisticated method of suicide. As well as the implementation of our "right to aggression." so the author broke away from reality ...
  25. +5
    1 June 2015 08: 51
    Although it is doubtful that such aggression will be in the near future, there is every chance of an open attack. The truth is not in the Moscow and St. Petersburg directions. There are enough troops there to divide a very large group by zero. Most likely they will stir up conflict in areas remote from the center. Block economically Kaliningrad. In every possible way, insert sticks into the screws of the civilian fleet, closing the entrance to the ports and refusing to repair or fuel. There will be attempts to land civil airliners allegedly on suspicion of something. They will push the closure of joint ventures and projects, no matter what level.
    In general, in the near future we will be small, but often bite. Confirmation of this, the US attempt to take away the World Cup from us through the arrests of the head of FIFA. It will only get worse.
    In US provocations, masters will take full advantage of this.
  26. +2
    1 June 2015 08: 56
    Author or provocateur or schizophrenic. Or maybe both.
  27. Vladimir111
    +1
    1 June 2015 09: 04
    One must always be ready for everything, the most unexpected scenario may be played out. But this article must be classified, suddenly the NATO will like this plan -))
  28. +6
    1 June 2015 09: 07
    There is no doubt that Russia will win any war! But at what cost, you should think about it. The article is controversial in many ways, but there are thoughts that should not be avoided, which makes sense to discuss and implement. This applies to the Kaliningrad region, it is very isolated ... And the security of maritime communications with mainland Russia should be developed, strengthened and increased!
  29. +1
    1 June 2015 09: 13
    Delirium of a delusional nonsense, to see good grass growing on the shore of Azov and a cow eating delirious grass, gives such milk that fly agarics rest.
  30. 0
    1 June 2015 09: 24
    I agree the author smokes and imagines himself a hawk.
    1. -1
      1 June 2015 09: 35
      Rather, the author is a pompous cock.
  31. 0
    1 June 2015 09: 28
    Have you prepared a heating pad? Our Tuzik was waiting ...
  32. +1
    1 June 2015 09: 29
    As my foreman used to say: "BSK!" (bullshit.)
  33. +1
    1 June 2015 09: 30
    The reason for starting a big war is likely to be the ultimatum of Ukraine or the United States with NATO to return Crimea

    And right after that, Poplar will fly ... So as not to pull the cat by the tail.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. ivan.ru
      0
      1 June 2015 16: 28
      0

      Avatar Major
       satris RU  Today, 09:30



      The reason for starting a big war is likely to be the ultimatum of Ukraine or the United States with NATO to return Crimea

      And right after that, the Poplars will fly ... So as not to pull the cat by the tail
      Tomahawks will fly first. suddenly, without warning, under cover of night darkness. after this, poplars may not even fly. and then the ultimatum will arrive in time
  34. 0
    1 June 2015 09: 30
    Have you prepared a heating pad? Our Tuzik was waiting ...
  35. 0
    1 June 2015 09: 37
    Ukrainian and Baltic forces are NATO’s most powerful ram.
  36. 0
    1 June 2015 09: 38
    No, my friend, only smart defense. Aggressors have always finished poorly.
  37. +1
    1 June 2015 09: 41
    By the way, I read a similar story from one anti-Utopian writer. Only there the communications and strategic nuclear forces were disabled. And the president was also removed from power and the "chumodan with a pipka". And then yes, this scenario is quite real. But I read the book in 2012, a lot has changed since then. Even that author, publishing the final part of the epic, admitted that it was completely unrealistic. In short, the author of the article simply forgot to indicate under what initial data such a development of the situation is possible.
    Found. Andrey Sergeevich Zavadsky, "Invasion Day" cycle.
  38. +2
    1 June 2015 10: 01
    I absolutely do not want war. But we, as a rule, are not asked. Therefore, I would very much like, in case of the beginning of a mess, not to be limited to "forcing to peace", but to understand IMMEDIATELY IN FULL !!! So that only smoke remains from the armies of the aggressors. Or you can warn in advance that we will destroy everyone, everything at once. Stalin is gone and, accordingly, there will be no one to restrain the troops from retaliation. There will be one large field from the western borders of Russia and Belarus to the Channel and a rocky island beyond it.
    1. +2
      1 June 2015 12: 38
      I would not leave a rocky islet behind the English Channel. Danuegonhon. Just in case. May it be a place for divers around the world.
  39. +1
    1 June 2015 10: 04
    Since what time of the year is the Sea of ​​Azov suddenly blue? By the way. Essentially, this is a set of fantasies and hypotheses about a warlike West at the beginning of the 21st century. Nobody will fight with Russia there like 75 years ago. There is no spirit, and the gut is thin today. They are even balabolyat and shake the air, like offended boys and pout like capricious girls. In the end, they will run to the Kremlin with confession and excuse. Got excited. So far, time has worked for Russia, but the West itself is forcing us to leave the liberal raw material model. Well, thanks to him for that. Article minus.
  40. Korf
    0
    1 June 2015 10: 14
    I read and think - something familiar, painfully familiar ...
    The book is "The Day Before the Day After Tomorrow." Well written, believable, eerie ..
    The author of the article, in my opinion, read it overnight, "admired" the development of events, and published the article ..
    1. 0
      1 June 2015 10: 57
      Not. He just read Baltic horror stories about how Russia will attack the Baltic states and "turned" everything in the wrong direction. And now the Baltic states are attacking ...
  41. +3
    1 June 2015 10: 35
    Hitler was preparing for about five years, and entot wanted for a month ... laughing
    Here I sit and imagine ... I read the possessed article and thought: What a fool I was! It turns out that through the Baltic states it was necessary to advance, and I fought across Belarus ...
  42. The comment was deleted.
  43. +2
    1 June 2015 10: 39
    I think that the guys from the General Staff still do not eat their bread for nothing, they monitor the situation in a timely manner and predict (calculate) options. I am sure that they cannot suddenly attack the Russian Federation.
  44. 0
    1 June 2015 10: 43
    > And again we will restore everything at our own expense, and the profits will be calculated in London and New York.

    there will be no London, nor New York, nor profits
  45. -2
    1 June 2015 10: 54
    Such provocative publications are necessary so that possible variants of paintings of the near future do not seem too unexpected later.

    The author warns. Thank you for that.

    True, in conclusion he makes a confident conclusion about the guaranteed victory of Russia, and this is premature.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  46. HAM
    0
    1 June 2015 11: 44
    The author contradicts himself in some places, for example: ".... profits will be counted in London and New York." .. according to his logic, we will only substitute "cheeks" for blows. In "the Novgorod region, bad roads" are , yes, this is a problem, you will not pass a gay parade. The solidarity of the Westerners is somewhat embellished (to put it mildly), they even in peacetime squabble among themselves, and they are glad to die for others !!
  47. 0
    1 June 2015 11: 49
    I read this opus - I’ll go dig a bunker soldier
  48. The comment was deleted.
    1. 0
      1 June 2015 17: 17
      well pushed ... most likely even the truth ... so what suggestions? raise the legs up? screaming that everything is gone? what to do?
  49. +5
    1 June 2015 11: 59
    If it's a call to war. That Russia is not the first to attack. We are not the aggressors and occupiers whom the West wants to see us. We are people ready to defend our freedom. we don’t need someone else’s. But ours will not give up. [/ Quote]
    //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
    How to relate to the complete blockade of Transnistria - by land and by air, arranged today? After all, this is a military action! The population of Transnistria twice held a referendum on joining Russia, and the Russian leadership did not say anything ... By this, Russia exacerbated the situation. What can be done for the deblocade of Transnistria? If Transnistria were recognized in at least some minimal form (an associative member, a candidate for membership ... a name could have been invented), but the Kremlin didn’t do it in time. Then today it was possible to threaten the use of force for the blockade .. And so the West wins the strategic party with small steps. Torn off and ruined Yugoslavia, now tears off Transnistria ...
  50. +3
    1 June 2015 12: 10
    We need to place claws and paws in the south and north and face with fangs to the west !!! And I think the Dragon will cover our ass !!! hi
    1. +2
      1 June 2015 12: 59
      He will pull you into an ace when he is profitable. How many times the schoolchildren were told that we have no friends and allies, only our own Army and Navy. And now read the story how many times Russia was betrayed in wars. You are trusting, our.
  51. +3
    1 June 2015 12: 15
    It is now impossible to hide a large group either in the forest or in the field. This is why space reconnaissance exists. Therefore, the author’s reasoning about the forest, where it is easy for half a million soldiers to hide, looks more than strange. It's not 1945. Even at that time, aviation reconnaissance was at its best.
    In addition, the Ukrainian army does not have aviation. You can't fight with light small arms. And airplanes are an expensive pleasure, which they will not be able to afford for a very long time. Moreover, you cannot hide groups in the Baltic states. After all, everything needs to be delivered by ships and planes.
    Naturally, when preparing such an “invasion,” Russia will have many questions for its “friends.” “Friends” are not stupid either, and they understand everything.
    As for the hostilities themselves, our strategy officially states that in the event of a NATO invasion we will use nuclear weapons. Moreover, it is understandable with the rapid development of the conflict into a global one. Because if we use tactical nuclear weapons, then they will too. This means that tactical nuclear weapons will be followed by strategic nuclear weapons on the continents of both continents.
  52. +1
    1 June 2015 12: 18
    The downside is that the forum members also expressed my opinion about this opus.
  53. +3
    1 June 2015 12: 22
    Bugaga !!!
    author ZhZhOT!!!

    You have to be a total moron not to understand that war is being done to destroy people. What resources are there? They are already downloaded and taken out for free, because the green piece of paper is not worth anything at the moment. This is necessary for those who manage supranational structures that conduct anti-human activities. People, know this!!!
  54. 0
    1 June 2015 12: 25
    A burning topic. I agree with the author, a similar scenario needs to be thought out, and the army of the “brotherly people” needs to be burned out with napalm in the first hours of aggression in order to avoid bloodshed, ideally destroyed before... I hope there are smart people in the country’s leadership who are thinking through similar options. Well, if it does happen, then exterminate all the Anglo-Saxon evil spirits and the rest of the European community.
  55. +3
    1 June 2015 12: 31
    What nonsense? Throughout Europe, together with Ukraine, there is no such quantity and quality of troops that could reach Moscow. I would advise the author to familiarize himself with the sentiments of the people in Europe, for example in Germany; these sentiments, to put it mildly, are not militant.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. ivan.ru
      +1
      1 June 2015 16: 51
      “What kind of nonsense? Throughout Europe, together with Ukraine, there is no such quantity and quality of troops that could reach Moscow.”

      march to Moscow? This is stupidity, of course, no one will agree to it, not even crests. tomahawks and other flying crap will fly, so there’s no need to go to Moscow.

      “I would advise the author to familiarize himself with the sentiments of the people in Europe, for example in Germany; these sentiments, to put it mildly, are not militant.”
      Germany will not go to war, the stump is clear, then it will catch up, share the goodies. and crests, Psheks, Balts, Arabs, and some other Benelux will fight, or rather not fight, but clean up the remnants, the army by the time they enter will be left with light small arms, without communications, without logistics, without supplies and without command. and about Germany again - the Germans, a disciplined people, will order and go
  56. +1
    1 June 2015 12: 43
    It's time to build fortified areas.
  57. 0
    1 June 2015 14: 13
    Their “initiatives” to attack Russia will lead to the devastation of Europe and Britain and will make a large strait in the place of North America. Is THIS what they need? - They're scared. Let them not rely on impunity.
  58. +2
    1 June 2015 14: 58
    Surrounded on all sides. Flight time of missiles is minutes. They know the goals. All missiles cannot be intercepted. Draw conclusions.
    The one who hits first will win. Whatever they do, they must immediately beat the boss who is on the island. Then the rest of the punks. Warn him in advance.
    If J.V. Stalin had struck our “partners” first, the map of Europe would now be different, without NATO bases, etc.
  59. -1
    1 June 2015 15: 47
    Quote: retired
    What was it? what

    Complete nonsense. The author painted a picture of Russia’s grandiose offensive, but did not show those “valiant” troops who would carry it all out. But he didn’t show it, because THEY simply ARE NOT. Well, now the EU (and all of NATO) is not eager to fight. Especially with Russia, especially with OWN hands. Even past conquerors (Napoleon, Hitler) first created their armies, “tested” them in battles and only then took risks. Who will commit suicide now? Well, NATO does not have a combat-ready army (confusion and vacillation) and there is no worthy motivation for war in general, and even more so for a war with Russia. They can (and would not mind) throw gangs of Svidomo Raguli against us, but... again there is a problem. The Ukrobands are shackled in front of Novorossiya (honor and glory to it) and there is no way forward for them.
  60. +2
    1 June 2015 16: 31
    Greetings to all my detractors from Shirokino, from the shores of the perhaps not blue Sea of ​​Azov.
    Hello even to those who consider me a drug addict high on Afghan weed or an alcoholic who hasn’t gotten over his hangover, and that everything I’ve written is nonsense.
    It is difficult to argue with your “specific” arguments, especially when instead of arguments there is drool, emotions and insults.
    Let me tell you for those who don’t know, armies are designed to destroy the enemy’s Armed Forces, infrastructure, industry, economy and seize territories and eliminate mobilization opportunities. Approximately as it was in 1917-1918. Therefore, whether in the 20th century or in the 21st, Russia cannot be broken without intervention. But, every day over the past year, Russia’s military-strategic position is deteriorating every day. It’s all good in the newspapers and forums, but we’re keeping our losses secret, which is absolutely correct at this stage, and we’re rebuilding the army on the run, and we’re trying to switch to self-sufficiency in the defense industry, agriculture, finance, etc.
    Maybe the Americans have different combat plans, but with the article I tried to justify our right to aggression, and not just to wipe away spit. Maybe they are only planning a campaign for Caucasian oil, and not to the center of communications and control - Moscow. I was not informed. Apparently, the topic of the right to be aggressive will have to be covered from other angles. Wait. Stock up on elegant insults and televised arguments. Wait. I’ll write as soon as the shelling ends and the Internet appears.
    And I observe the growth in the quality of the Ukrainian army and its combat capabilities every day and try to prevent this to the best of my ability.
  61. 0
    1 June 2015 17: 03
    Quote: Navigator2013
    Half of those who spoke above, holding the machine gun in their hands, will think - pull the trigger or not pull, or maybe it itself ... Not about the author, you need to talk.

    No, well, you’re in vain, and not half, but ten percent... bruises and injuries will occur when you pull the trigger during recoil. And then nothing, they’ll get used to it! laughing
  62. +1
    1 June 2015 17: 40
    Quote: ROMAN VYSOTSKY
    Greetings to all my detractors from Shirokino, from the shores of the perhaps not blue Sea of ​​Azov.
    Hello even to those who consider me a drug addict high on Afghan weed or an alcoholic who hasn’t gotten over his hangover, and that everything I’ve written is nonsense.
    It is difficult to argue with your “specific” arguments, especially when instead of arguments there is drool, emotions and insults.
    Let me tell you for those who don’t know, armies are designed to destroy the enemy’s Armed Forces, infrastructure, industry, economy and seize territories and eliminate mobilization opportunities. Approximately as it was in 1917-1918. Therefore, whether in the 20th century or in the 21st, Russia cannot be broken without intervention. But, every day over the past year, Russia’s military-strategic position is deteriorating every day. It’s all good in the newspapers and forums, but we’re keeping our losses secret, which is absolutely correct at this stage, and we’re rebuilding the army on the run, and we’re trying to switch to self-sufficiency in the defense industry, agriculture, finance, etc.
    Maybe the Americans have different combat plans, but with the article I tried to justify our right to aggression, and not just to wipe away spit. Maybe they are only planning a campaign for Caucasian oil, and not to the center of communications and control - Moscow. I was not informed. Apparently, the topic of the right to be aggressive will have to be covered from other angles. Wait. Stock up on elegant insults and televised arguments. Wait. I’ll write as soon as the shelling ends and the Internet appears.
    And I observe the growth in the quality of the Ukrainian army and its combat capabilities every day and try to prevent this to the best of my ability.



    No, the scenario you described is quite real... only for some reason you didn’t predict the response of the Russian Federation... none at all... Yes, it will be clear that the first strike will destroy a lot... but I think that a lot of things will remain... all of them They are unlikely to be able to get it... but then what? Besides trampling into the Stone Age, in order to capture territory it is necessary for soldiers to capture it... what's with that? It is unlikely that they will attack for the sake of simply bombing... I don’t think that such a large number of crests are eager to go on a campaign... the punitive forces are understandable... to profit from something... but as linear units this is unlikely... Yes and if something is captured from partisanship, it’s unlikely that any kind of logistics will help them. They still haven’t been able to do anything with Afghanistan and Iraq, and then consider that the local partisans don’t have any equipment... and yet they are screwing NATO both in the tail and in the mane... And I think China will not remain on the sidelines because they perfectly understand who will be next... And again, you shouldn’t forget about the Yadren loaf... I don’t think that they will thin out nuclear weapons carriers much... What will they do with our missile carriers near the coast of the USA and Europe? It is clear that Europe, like the states, will try to push the crests and Balts with the Poles ahead of themselves, but I don’t think that they will want an attack on their territories, despite the fact that they will try to fight remotely or in the second echelon... What will they do in this case? Will they hit us?
  63. 0
    1 June 2015 18: 16
    guys, I’m a special forces officer, 7 deployments to Chechnya, now retired, and I say there’s no need for war. I want to live in peace and raise children. We must try to prevent it. But if it starts, I’ll be first in line at the military registration and enlistment office.
  64. 0
    1 June 2015 18: 56
    Of course, there is no particular reason to rush before a possible serious military campaign. We are gathering internally and financially. And then, you see, we’ll solve the “issues” as they arise, “we’ll defeat and drive away the enemy” (from the song). Well, the author, apparently, had too much chicken poop for a snack, and his imagination was so bewitched.
  65. +1
    1 June 2015 19: 20
    Should we start to be afraid?
    This is kind of a fashionable trend - tremble, the army of Mordor is already coming for you, to be honest, I’m tired of it.
  66. 0
    1 June 2015 23: 31
    Quote: ivan.ru
    pout with all their might

    And they will sulk until they burst.
  67. 0
    2 June 2015 11: 12
    Quote: Putin
    But in my opinion, the author has played in tanks, and now on his knees he is drawing a barberry plan for Batman, Winnie the Pooh and the Eeyore donkey


    Showcase.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"