Military Review

Four nuclear-powered submarine missile carriers will return to the Pacific Fleet

35
At the end of November 2015 in the Pacific fleet Four nuclear submarine missile carriers will return to Russia: the K-150 Tomsk, the K-419 Kuzbass, the K-331 Magadan and the K-44 Ryazan, which are undergoing repair and modernization at the Zvezda Far Eastern Plant.


Four nuclear-powered submarine missile carriers will return to the Pacific Fleet


“By the end of November, the Tomsk, Kuzbass, Magadan and Ryazan rocket carriers will complete the modernization program at the Zvezda Far Eastern Plant and return to the Pacific Fleet,” a shipbuilding source quoted as saying. "Military Industrial Courier".

The source noted that the work on these submarines should have been completed in the 2013 year, however, for several reasons, the process was delayed for two years.

The nuclear submarine missile cruiser project 949A "Antey" K-150 "Tomsk" was accepted into the Navy in December 1996 year. In August, 1998 handed it over to the Pacific Fleet. Its repair and modernization will cost about 150 million rubles.

Nuclear submarine (nuclear submarine) 971 "Pike-B" K-419 "Kuzbass" is part of the 10-th division of the submarine. The contract for its repairs and upgrades worth 1 billion 10 million rubles was signed 17 August 2009. The works on the Magadan nuclear-powered ship of the same type will cost 163 a million rubles.

The strategic submarine missile cruiser of the 667BDR Kalmar K-44 Ryazan project has been undergoing repairs and upgrades since 2011.
Photos used:
http://vpk-news.ru/
35 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Baikonur
    Baikonur 22 May 2015 11: 13
    +14
    Good news!!! I do not stop rejoicing for our submarine fleet !!!
    1. Rostovchanin
      Rostovchanin 22 May 2015 11: 17
      +14
      "It's just some kind of Holiday! (C)"
      1. 41 REGION
        41 REGION 22 May 2015 11: 21
        +11
        Quote: Rostovchanin
        "It's just some kind of Holiday! (C)"

        This is not a holiday, the repair was delayed, but better late than never. So what we look forward to good
        1. sub307
          sub307 22 May 2015 11: 27
          +5
          Well, if that be so - the Pacific Fleet will receive more than a serious replenishment.
          1. g1v2
            g1v2 22 May 2015 11: 48
            +8
            Well, the news is strange. Throughout the whole infe that was on the Internet K-331 "Magadan" and K-419 "Kuzbass" were just being repaired, not modernized. K-150 "Tomsk" too. Here Ryazan underwent repairs with modernization, but the degree of modernization is not clear - most likely there is still more repair. As for the Squids, we have 3 of them (K-44 Ryazan, K-433 St. George the Victorious, K-223 " Podolsk ”) in general it is not clear whether they will be modernized as dolphins or will they be replaced by boreas as they arrive. Here we are talking about the fact that the number of carriers and warheads should fit into the requirements of strategic offensive arms. 6 Dolphins we recently upgraded and re-equipped, 3 Borea new, one Shark modernized, 2 will be disposed of and 3 squids remain, the fate of which is unclear. And 5 Boreevs are planned, 3 of which are already under construction.
            If we put the boreas into operation and leave the squid, then we will accordingly have to reduce the number of ground warheads. Yes, we are again going to put railway carriers into operation, because there will be a redistribution of strategic nuclear forces with an increase in the number of underwater-based missiles and a decrease in ground-based ones.
            1. veksha50
              veksha50 22 May 2015 12: 16
              +7
              Quote: g1v2
              The point here is that the number of carriers and warheads should fit into the requirements of strategic offensive arms.



              It seems to me that we are now approaching the point where to comply with previously concluded agreements with the United States - deaths are similar ...

              All these agreements were sharpened to reduce the ability of the Russian nuclear triad to give an answer to everyone right away, and they described only the parity of the USSR-Russia and the USA, not taking into account the same England and France - NATO members that have their own nuclear weapons ... Well, there’s still a friend of the state of Israel - also owns its own nuclear weapons ... I’m not talking about a bunch of explicit and implicit owners ...

              So nuclear parity between Russia and the USA is far from guaranteeing Russia's security ...
              1. g1v2
                g1v2 22 May 2015 14: 02
                +1
                We did not sign START because of spiritual kindness, but because otherwise we will not be able to maintain parity with the states. They could have trivially kept more warheads and carriers than we are, especially since many missiles are already old and in terms of length of service and filling. This level provides mutual destruction, in which case the equality of us and the states. In addition, money is needed for rearmament with conventional weapons, and nuclear forces are still forces that should not be used. We are not going to withdraw from START, unlike the CFE Treaty, which is clearly harmful to us, because it is outdated and does not allow us to keep as much strength as necessary and where necessary.
              2. Arikkhab
                Arikkhab 22 May 2015 19: 56
                0
                and how, so to speak, "Makar", is Israel able to deliver its (alleged) warheads to the territory of the Russian Federation?
            2. gispanec
              gispanec 22 May 2015 12: 44
              +3
              Quote: g1v2
              one shark upgraded

              Excuse me, but which shark is modernized? ... we are talking about strategists .....
              Quote: g1v2
              Here we are talking about the number of carriers and warheads
              ..... if about the project water carrier 941, then there is only one shaft under the mace ... and the rest are empty, there are no missiles for them .... like that ...
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. Mitek
          Mitek 22 May 2015 11: 29
          +3
          We are preparing, maybe we will have time.
        4. NEXUS
          NEXUS 22 May 2015 11: 37
          +1
          Quote: 41 REGION
          This is not a holiday, the repair was delayed, but better late than never. So what we look forward to

          good news. 4 missile carriers will not interfere with us at all. Now, if in this year the "Ash" was launched and "Borey" ... in general, there would have been ZER GUD good
        5. vladkavkaz
          vladkavkaz 22 May 2015 11: 39
          +7
          41 REGION
          The repair was delayed ... that would be to ask those who delayed the repair, but for one and those who indulged the puffs, it was very interesting to look at these faces.
          1. kolobok63
            kolobok63 22 May 2015 14: 21
            0
            I think that if the people see these "faces", they will still live happily ever after! An example is Serdyukov's face! And how I would like to see him behind bars ... But it’s not destiny! hi
    2. oleg-gr
      oleg-gr 22 May 2015 11: 27
      +1
      Really great news! And let the knees of "friends and partners" tremble.
  2. aszzz888
    aszzz888 22 May 2015 11: 14
    +1
    Well, what else could be better news ?!

    Three-fold "Hurray!"
  3. Magic archer
    Magic archer 22 May 2015 11: 16
    +2
    Yes, the Pacific zone is now tense. The Japanese and Chinese are constantly strengthening the fleet, the Koreans are also not lagging behind. Moreover, all countries have territorial claims to each other! So we must strengthen ourselves and make sure that we don’t even look in our direction!
  4. KOH
    KOH 22 May 2015 11: 18
    +9
    The source noted that the work on these submarines should have been completed in the 2013 year, however, for several reasons, the process was delayed for two years.



    But for this it is necessary to give the Lyuli ... that would move your ass ...
  5. SERGE.RU
    SERGE.RU 22 May 2015 11: 21
    0
    And let all the arsonists JUDGE!;)
  6. The comment was deleted.
  7. andrei332809
    andrei332809 22 May 2015 11: 21
    +2
    long loafs ... winked
    good hiking drinks
  8. dsm100
    dsm100 22 May 2015 11: 23
    +2
    Well done !!! Still more to release Boreev yes Ash-tree ....
  9. ssn18
    ssn18 22 May 2015 11: 25
    +6
    Ah well done! And the main thing is very timely, otherwise the yapis again begin to bark about the Kuril Islands. And the people, on the next branch, are pessimistic about this, they say with armament we have there rather poorly. Reassured as he could. The last argument was, the supreme said ..
  10. pensioner
    pensioner 22 May 2015 11: 29
    +2
    And what is the difference in the aggregate volley of nuclear submarine-launched ballistic missiles between Russia and the USA? Who is in the know?
    1. ssn18
      ssn18 22 May 2015 11: 44
      +4
      The current combat strength of the Russian Navy at 2013 for the submarine nuclear fleet capable of carrying strategic and cruise missiles:
      Strategic missile submarine cruisers — total 14 units. Of these, 4 units. are in reserve or undergoing repairs or upgrades, but withdrawn from service. Thus, in the combat structure of the SSBN-10 units.
      Multipurpose nuclear submarines torpedo missiles with cruise-all 28 units. of which 14 units. in reserve or in repair and withdrawn from service. Thus, the combat strength of this class of boats is 14 units.
      A total of submarines capable of carrying long-range nuclear weapons in the Russian Navy in the 24 battle formation.
      http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Список_кораблей_Военно-Морского_Флота_Российской_Фе
      deration
      Combat composition of the US Navy:
      Ballistic missile nuclear submarines - 14 units.
      Nuclear submarines with cruise missiles-4 units
      Nuclear submarines:
      type "Los Angeles" (Los Angeles) -42ed.
      type "Sivulf" (Seawolf) - 3 units.
      type "Virginia" (Virginia) - 9 units.
      All in all, in the US Navy 60 nuclear submarines capable of carrying long-range nuclear weapons to one degree or another
      http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Военно-морские_силы_США

      something like this. The data is true for 2013, well +/-
      1. Lt. Air Force stock
        Lt. Air Force stock 22 May 2015 16: 38
        +1
        Quote: ssn18
        Ballistic missile nuclear submarines - 14 units.

        Only 12 are capable of fighting; 2nd submarines are constantly under repair.
        Quote: ssn18
        type "Los Angeles" (Los Angeles) -42ed.

        Los Angeles 39 left.
        Quote: ssn18
        type "Virginia" (Virginia) - 9 units.

        Virginia 11 units.
    2. lis-ik
      lis-ik 22 May 2015 12: 59
      +2
      That one novel 1977 knows.
    3. The comment was deleted.
  11. kote119
    kote119 22 May 2015 11: 30
    +3
    The nuclear submarine missile cruiser project 949A "Antey" K-150 "Tomsk" was accepted into the Navy in December 1996 year. In August, 1998 handed it over to the Pacific Fleet. Its repair and modernization will cost about 150 million rubles.

    the prices are just not real, that's enough for the dock
    1. The comment was deleted.
  12. region46
    region46 22 May 2015 11: 31
    +2
    it’s only honestly to say that for that kind of money they were able to modernize, and even repair. 150 million for this case is not very much
    1. maiman61
      maiman61 22 May 2015 13: 23
      +1
      Darken something. What can be done with 150 lyam? Only paint.
      1. kolobok63
        kolobok63 22 May 2015 14: 25
        0
        Guys, it's in the green !!! hi
  13. starshina pv
    starshina pv 22 May 2015 11: 32
    +1
    right supreme said .... !!!!
  14. wanderer_032
    wanderer_032 22 May 2015 11: 33
    +1
    Four nuclear-powered submarine missile carriers will return to the Pacific Fleet

    Good news for Pacific Fleet Day.
    1. Vladimir Pozlnyakov
      Vladimir Pozlnyakov 22 May 2015 12: 46
      0
      Quote: wanderer_032
      Four nuclear-powered submarine missile carriers will return to the Pacific Fleet
      Good news for Pacific Fleet Day.


      That's the same island macaques sorry they asked, invited to visit the zoo!
  15. Foresterer
    Foresterer 22 May 2015 11: 36
    +1
    Each missile carrier has a good crew, each crew an excellent nuclear submarine!
  16. Bassoon
    Bassoon 22 May 2015 11: 40
    0
    It's nice that they don't forget about Pacific Fleet
  17. twincam
    twincam 22 May 2015 11: 41
    0
    Well done.
    And I wonder if the Shark project will be revived?
    1. gispanec
      gispanec 22 May 2015 12: 47
      +1
      Quote: twincam
      And I wonder if the Shark project will be revived?

      no .. all remaining except one sawed .... and one as a stand for ballistic missile launches
  18. slizhov
    slizhov 22 May 2015 11: 42
    0
    In the Pacific, it's time to put things in order ...
    The Yankees mate with the Japanese and wait for Russia to strengthen China’s group ..? :)
    And if it strengthens - All "psaki" will be pregnant and begin a peaceful life in their monastery ...
  19. veksha50
    veksha50 22 May 2015 12: 11
    +1
    Well, here is our "answer to Chamberlain", that is, Japan and the United States, which began to intensively muddy the waters in this region ...

    At least from the Pacific Fleet, at least one nuclear submarine will be constantly on alert in the ocean, and those standing at the pier will also have combat power ...

    Paradoxical as it sounds, but the more weapons we have and the better they are, the greater the confidence that we will live in peaceful conditions while there is no war ...

    Do not touch better than the Russian bear ...
  20. midashko
    midashko 22 May 2015 12: 20
    -4
    Chickens in the fall count. In our country, atomic boats burn right in factories, and rockets do not fall so one after another and arsenals burn every summer.
    1. maiman61
      maiman61 22 May 2015 13: 25
      +1
      I think vrazhin problems no less, break through!
    2. Vasily Krylov
      Vasily Krylov 22 May 2015 13: 50
      0
      for information chick chick, on tiptoe, chick. Through s. The rest through i. Circus, etc. And that is why they burn and fall.
  21. fridge
    fridge 22 May 2015 13: 47
    +1
    This is a topic for joy, because Mi-shit, we need to produce and repair all weapons ourselves. Medvedev as president created an extra smut. Yes, and about the national projects subsided. So politicians act in the knowledge that after two years the people usually already forget and do not ask questions, but sang like a nightingale.
  22. mag nit
    mag nit 22 May 2015 14: 20
    0
    This is not a blunder.
  23. VohaAhov
    VohaAhov 22 May 2015 14: 51
    +2
    Quote: g1v2
    Well, the news is strange. Throughout the whole infe that was on the Internet K-331 "Magadan" and K-419 "Kuzbass" were just being repaired, not modernized. K-150 "Tomsk" too. Here Ryazan underwent repairs with modernization, but the degree of modernization is not clear - most likely there is still more repair. As for the Squids, we have 3 of them (K-44 Ryazan, K-433 St. George the Victorious, K-223 " Podolsk ”) in general it is not clear whether they will be modernized as dolphins or will they be replaced by boreas as they arrive. Here we are talking about the fact that the number of carriers and warheads should fit into the requirements of strategic offensive arms. 6 Dolphins we recently upgraded and re-equipped, 3 Borea new, one Shark modernized, 2 will be disposed of and 3 squids remain, the fate of which is unclear. And 5 Boreevs are planned, 3 of which are already under construction.
    If we put the boreas into operation and leave the squid, then we will accordingly have to reduce the number of ground warheads. Yes, we are again going to put railway carriers into operation, because there will be a redistribution of strategic nuclear forces with an increase in the number of underwater-based missiles and a decrease in ground-based ones.

    We perfectly see and hear how our "Boreas" are built on TV. Officials and bosses beat themselves in the chest. The same "Borei", according to reports, should have been in Kamchatka back in 2011. However, in the courtyard of 2015, there are only bravado statements, and Boreys are still there. There is hope that this year "Alexander Nevsky" will come. So the "Squids" must be maintained in a combat-ready state until the "Boreas" arrive. It is not clear why "Yuri Dolgoruky" was left on the Northern Fleet? It would be possible to make a homogeneous combination of the project 955 boats - Dolgoruky, Nevsky, Monomakh. And so one on the Northern Fleet, the other two may be on the Pacific Fleet ... In general, some misunderstandings.
    1. g1v2
      g1v2 22 May 2015 15: 38
      +1
      3 out of 8 Boreans were built and handed over to the fleet. For comparison, only one ash tree was built. Where they are to decide mo. In my opinion, they have the very place in the Federation Council, because there you can safely go to the operational space. At the Pacific Fleet, they are being watched from Japan. The ability of the states and the Japanese to counter them in the Pacific is much higher than in the north.
  24. Tektor
    Tektor 22 May 2015 15: 48
    +2
    The current state of ships of rank 1 and 2, with the exception of strategists, although they can also participate in normal showdowns ...
    Open Ocean FleetOpen Ocean Fleet
  25. Pomah
    Pomah 22 May 2015 18: 17
    0
    hello to American sanctions. True repair tightened up ...