Comprehensive training snipers now no

15

“The quality of training of snipers, their equipment and armament in the US Army and the Bundeswehr is much better than ours,” said Vladimir Palkin, lieutenant colonel of the special forces of the Airborne Forces. So he commented on the statement by the Ministry of Defense about the introduction of a new concept of working with snipers in the Russian army.

The composition of the combined arms of the Ground Forces introduced sniper units. This was announced on Friday by the official representative of the Ground Forces Sergey Vlasov. “The implementation of the concept of improving the system of training and use of snipers in the types and kinds of troops of the Armed Forces of Russia will allow solving the tasks of building a corps of highly professional snipers,” said Vlasov.

According to him, the new concept of forming sniper units "will change the quality of the organization of the educational process in the units and parts using modern technologies and technical means."

In accordance with this concept, several types of rifles with various indicators of the main combat properties will come into service with the new divisions, snipers will receive pistols and observation and reconnaissance devices, including laser ones.

“Individual and group equipment of a sniper pair includes a sniper complex, uniforms, equipment and other equipment necessary for carrying out tasks and maintaining vital functions,” Vlasov said.

According to the representative of the Ministry of Defense, the new concept involves maintaining a multi-level selection of sniper units and sniper training in special centers at intervals of once every three to four years.

Recall now in the Armed Forces of individual sniper units there. In the rifle units of the state it is supposed to have one sniper in the composition of each department.

The veteran of the two Chechen campaigns, lieutenant colonel of the special forces of the Airborne Forces Vladimir Palkin, told the VZGLYAD newspaper about what changes the formation of sniper units could bring in practice.

VIEW: Vladimir Vitalyevich, how do you assess the beginning of the formation of specialized sniper units in the army?

Vladimir Palkin: When I commanded special forces groups on reconnaissance missions, I had scouts and snipers at my disposal. Ideally, of course, they should not go in chains - that in the infantry units, that in the airborne. Because in this case he will not be able to complete his work as a sniper in full.

Separately, the unit snipers, which will be attached to the infantry or other units, will be able to more directly target the enemy with fire. More benefit will be.

LOOK: In what way can this benefit be expressed?

VP: A person who is firing long distances and on accuracy in an offensive or defense as part of a squad or platoon is now more subordinate to the squad or platoon commander. And executes his oral orders precisely for separation. On the scale of the same branch of snipers, you can lead the destruction of more significant objects, and even snipers will be more mobile. The latter is also important because the anti-sniper case does not stand still either.

Being in the chain, the sniper is knocked out one of the first. The commander, sniper, radio operator, machine gunner are those people whom the enemy tries to destroy in the first place.

There is one more thing. Specialized sniper units may spend more time on self-study. The skills of covert movement, disguise, as well as waiting for your goal, its destruction and secretive withdrawal - all this requires better training.

VIEW: What is the situation with the preparation of snipers at the present time?

VP: In 1987, I entered the school. Until now, I only saw the systematic and competent training of snipers in our 45 regiment - this is the special forces of the Airborne Forces. Believe me, a sniper specialist is a piece of goods. It requires lengthy preparation and should not be engaged in digging trenches in the squad. You need to work with him individually.

In the linear parts of the training snipers is given the wrong amount of effort and time that is required. There are good arrows. But sniper business is a set of activities.

We were visited by guys from Vympel and Alpha. I watched them: the group works according to plan, and the snipers - completely separate. It should be so. Because the sniper's task is not to move in the chains or columns of his unit, but to work from a distance: detect targets in front of his unit, destroy them, ensure safe movement. And, of course, hit the enemy first, if his weapon allows it.

VIEW: So you think that with the creation of separate units of snipers, the training of such specialists in the army will improve?

VP: Of course, it should improve.

VIEW: How is sniper business organized in the advanced foreign armies?

VP: I can’t say anything about the organizational structure. But the quality of training snipers, their equipment and weapons in the US Army and the Bundeswehr are much better than ours. Although in Russia there are isolated purchases of good weapons, and we also have some results.

As far as I know, in the competitions that took place recently in Krasnodar between snipers of the Ministry of Defense, the Ministry of Internal Affairs and other structures, snipers showed decent results.

My sergeant was in Yugoslavia, there was also a competition between the servicemen of the USA, Germany and Russia. He got there from some distance into a five-kopeck coin from the SVD, but these are all isolated cases. Comprehensive training snipers now no.

VIEW: Is it possible to consider that the unification of snipers into separate units will be a step towards the integrated training of such specialists?

VP: You know, I am most pleased with that moment (I read today the words of the Minister of Defense), which Serdyukov said about the sniper's salary. He said that a sniper, if he is, should get like a sniper, that is, more than just a shooter.
15 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. KASKAD
    0
    9 October 2011 21: 49
    Yes, Palkin is just the same captain, there is no training in rifles in Russia since after the second world the instructors were disbanded and no training programs were destroyed. In the USA there was something similar, but already in 1965 sniper training camps were formed, then veterans of the second world war and Korea were still alive, so they all restored in a matter of months we couldn’t succeed. Well, they can also make weapons, unlike Izh Masha
    1. 0
      15 December 2011 01: 17
      Well, they can also make weapons, unlike Izh Masha

      You know, there has been such a thought in the world for a long time that ours are fixated on Kalash, and amers stupidly give their pieces of iron a "showcase look".
      Everything is not so simple as it seems to you .... Fly over the mountains with which thread M4 or M16 for a week, don’t pay homage to it and you Kalash oh how you remember .... not for nothing that amers in Iraq often use AK.
      Let's look at the AK-12. but I still think that we can make a normal trunk and can do very well. No wonder only the Russian school of weapons was left!
  2. 0
    9 October 2011 23: 23
    A good rifle, from which you can shoot accurately from a distance of 1500-2000, costs 6000 $. At the expense of Izh Masha, I don’t agree - everything could be in demand. How can we fail? Unas the veterans of Afghanistan and Chechnya aren’t alive ?
    1. kesa1111
      +2
      10 October 2011 01: 37
      I agree out of 10 one can teach. To open training centers to the maximum year, there would be a desire. Movies and videos on sniping in the public domain, you can do the technique.
      1. 0
        10 October 2011 03: 06
        Precisely, in addition, to improve all this with Russian cunning and ingenuity.
    2. 0
      10 October 2011 14: 55
      A good rifle, from which you can conduct targeted shooting from a distance of 1500-2000m, costs $ 6000.

      What kind of rifle does it cost that much? at 1500 - 2000m, trunks of caliber from 0.338 and more work confidently, and they cost from 10k euros, and with a bare trunk, add optics, a calculator and the rest it will turn out all 20k euros ...
    3. KASKAD
      -1
      10 October 2011 14: 57
      The best rifle in Europe in 408 caliber (flashing the BTR80 side armor) with a accuracy of 0,1-0,2MOA costs 500000 rubles! And shoots 2300 meters.
      On IzhMash corruption, revelry, theft, not paying salaries, stupid designers who do not want to watch what others and machines manufactured in 1954 do. Go to any weapons store in the city and take a level with you,
      and ask any saiga or tiger to look, you will not find one without a mowing specimen. Izh Mash can only stifle small enterprises like "Tsar Cannon", which employed really worthy people who have been engaged in sniping for 20 years, who have studied production in the USA and created the best rifles in Europe, and in the place of support they are even refused to renew their production license, they got together and left Moscow region in the emirates and work there, but we cry where to get decent and not expensive rifles.
      1. 0
        10 October 2011 15: 15
        The best rifle in Europe in 408 caliber (flashing the BTR80 side armor) with a accuracy of 0,1-0,2MOA costs 500000 rubles! And shoots 2300 meters.

        And who is the manufacturer? I found only this:
        Intervention sniper rifle - CheyTac Long Range Rifle System (USA)

        The CheyTac LRRS weapon system, which includes, in addition to the Intervention M200 rifle with a telescopic sight, .408 CheyTac ammunition and a ballistic computer with sensors.
        According to CheyTac Associates, a manufacturer of .408 cartridges and weapons for them, the CheyTac LRRS system consisting of a CheyTac Intervention M200 rifle with a Nightforce NXS 5.5-22X optical sight, .408CheyTac cartridges, a branded ballistic computer (based on the PDA Casio Cassiopea M70) and connected to it Kestrel 4000 wind, temperature and atmospheric pressure sensors provide effective firing at a growth target at a range of 2000 meters, guaranteeing accuracy of less than 1 angular minute (1 MOA).
        1. KASKAD
          +1
          10 October 2011 15: 59
          Rifle LLC "Tsar cannon" SVL -3
          1. 0
            15 December 2011 01: 03
            Rifle LLC "Tsar cannon" SVL -3

            Throw a link, see, read!
      2. 0
        15 December 2011 01: 12
        Europe's best rifle in 408 caliber (flashing BTR80 side armor)

        Her and AKM punches and Ak-74 (but not sure)
        And shoots 2300 meters.
        On IzhMash corruption, revelry, theft, not paying salaries, stupid designers who do not want to watch what others and 1954 machines do. Go to any weapons store in the city and take a level with you

        Umm, I don't want to say anything like that, but, were you there? Or is it just your thoughts?
        And at the expense of the Tsar of the guns I agree, a very worthy organization was, unfortunately = (
  3. Russian
    0
    10 October 2011 05: 45
    The main thing is that things have moved in the right direction, the rest will work out,
    Thank God, in Russia there have always been excellent arrows.
  4. Staff_
    0
    10 October 2011 06: 52
    , nonsense, nonsense !!!
  5. +2
    10 October 2011 12: 04
    in general, as I understand it, many are confused. There is such a term. Marxman, by definition, is a well-trained soldier who uses conventional or sniper weapons. Marxman, although he can use sniper equipment, as a rule does not prepare special positions, does not work alone, uses radio communications, destroys enemy soldiers in most cases without an order ... The average range of a Marxman is 200 to 600 m.
    So the SVD is ideal for this, and according to the state it is in our troops in each department.
    The sniper, in the army sense, is a very well trained soldier who uses only special sniper weapons, special ammunition and special equipment, prepares special firing positions, and develops withdrawal methods on his own.
    The average range of a sniper is from 600 to 1000 m.
    So here we have trouble
  6. 0
    15 December 2011 01: 07
    since there seems to be a training center, and 10 has existed for years, even the film was watched on this topic.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DSkIlu85Trw