In place of the aircraft carrier "George Washington" to the shores of Japan will come "Ronald Reagan"

The US nuclear attack aircraft carrier “George Washington” completed its mission in the waters of East Asia and left the Yokosuka base in Japan at the entrance to Tokyo Bay on Monday, reports MIC with reference to tass. The ship went home for the overhaul and modernization.

According to the agency, in the fall in its place should arrive a new nuclear aircraft carrier Ronald Reagan, "which will perform tasks in the western part of the Pacific and the Indian Oceans."

The publication notes that "George Washington" was the only atomic aircraft carrier stationed outside the United States on a permanent basis. In Japan, he served from September 2008.

Help MIC: “Ronald Reagan is one of the world's largest warships, its displacement is 97 thousand tons. The length of this atomic aircraft carrier is almost a 333 meter. Two atomic reactors allow it to reach speeds up to 30 nodes (56 km / h). "Ronald Reagan" can carry up to 90 aircraft and helicopters, he has on board - more than 5,6 thousands of crew and other military personnel. "

According to the information that has appeared, the crew of the new ship will include about 2's thousands of sailors who previously served on George Washington.

Comments

[st25310]

Upgraded Ka-27 equipped with onboard radar with AFAR “Spear-A” successfully passed state tests
http://www.sdelanounas.ru/blogs/62512/

[Baikonur]

What does the KA-27 have to do with it ??? Write on the topic !!!!
Although the KA-27 is certainly super!

[st25310]

Why am I, "George Washington" and "Ronald Reagan" are ships of the same class - Nimitz. In Russian it is called X ... to X ... change. Now, if it was replaced by an aircraft carrier of the type "Gerald R. Ford" then yes. But in Russia, the KA-27 helicopter will be replaced by KA-27M helicopters.

[vodolaz]

Do we have means of destruction for aircraft carriers that are guaranteed to sink it in a short period of time?

[Zoldat_A]

Quote: vodolaz

And we have the means to destroy aircraft carrierswho are guaranteed to sink it in a short period of time?

To the fig. For example P-800 "Onyx" ("Yakhont"). When there was Krymnash, the American ships scampered them as part of the Bastion complex. And the P-700 "Granit" with a nuclear warhead with a capacity of 500 kilotons is generally handsome! A surface explosion of 500 kilotons is enough for tonsils of any aircraft carrier. I think that the American presidents - ships and people, have something to fear.

[tlauicol]

The bastion will not get an aircraft carrier. Onyx ships are not. There is no nuclear warhead on Granite (and on any other anti-ship missiles or torpedo) - they themselves refused

[polite people]

I think 2 000 diapers are also prepared for them in case of flying neutral air near our planes. Our electronic warfare has not yet been tested on aircraft carriers.

[NEXUS]

Quote: polite people

Our electronic warfare has not yet been tested on aircraft carriers.

a large and exceptional ship, a large and exceptional torpedo.

[Altona]

Quote: polite people

Our electronic warfare has not yet been tested on aircraft carriers.

----------------------
Not electronic warfare, dear, but aiming marks from "Bastion" have not yet been set, so that the operators on the radars of this vessel have a point squeezed and everything else sank into their underpants ...

[APS]

The Japanese will be very happy, especially to those 2000 who remained

[st25310]

The aircraft carrier George Washington will be replaced by the Ronald Reagan and then Bush, Clinton, Obama will come ...

[Thunderbolt]

Quote: st25310

And then Bush comes, Clinton, Obama ...

The latter is unlikely. It was painful for him to have a negative image and not one of his deeds could be called heroic to be called an aircraft carrier in honor of him. However, it is possible that a target ship will be laid down and launched into the American shipyard for testing new anti-ship missiles. And here, Barak has a chance to get into the history of the American fleet. And very good.

[pvv113]

Those rubber boats that were presented to Ukraine can be called Obama

[kolyhalovs]

Yoko, apparently, was still that Japanese ...

[Lynx]

But why upgrade home? Flood and that's it ... right in Tokyo Bay)

[Alexanderrr]

Quote: Lynx

But why upgrade home? Flood and that's it ... right in Tokyo Bay)

And the one who will succeed, there too! After all, America. Spit is an exceptional nation, so their surface ships are under water, in view of their exceptionality!

[MIKHALYCH1]

Two nuclear reactors allow it to reach speeds of up to 30 knots (56 km / h).

A powerful infection ..! Japan and South Korea are insured .. Why don’t you say, but the mattresses are strong in terms of armaments .. Of course, we smell a bit, but when such a colossus is nearby, the feeling is not pleasant ...

[Black Hundred]

And sho? The Germans won the Mauses too, and what did they lead to? If something happens to green, all of these aircraft carriers will drag the economy to the bottom like a stone. )))

[padded jacket]

Not quite of course in the subject, but recently the DPRK conducted tests of SLBMs, and judging by the fact that Western news agencies reported only about the fact of the launch, but they "modestly" kept silent about the results, the tests were successful.

Kim Jong-un happy with start-up

In the background is the submarine with which the launch was made.

[MIKHALYCH1]

Fine! Cool photos .. (usually in the Western Eun mass media inflated and evil) US aircraft carriers are unlikely to be able to do with the DPRK! I think there is opposition there ..

[st25310]

He also eats sabak.

[Evil Pole]

Yeah alive

[brisk]

The level of real respect for the state on the globe is still determined by the presence of such aircraft carriers and attached groups (plus airborne assault forces and other cover). No less than nuclear submarines with homing missiles. Rather, even more.

“In April 1955, Kuznetsov presented a draft report on a ten-year shipbuilding plan in the Central Committee of the CPSU ... N. S. Khrushchev spoke out ... Kuznetsov honestly expressed to Khrushchev his indignation at the irresponsible attitude towards the fleet by Nikita Sergeevich and his entourage.”
“On February 15, 1956 he was called to the Minister of Defense, and G.K. Zhukov rudely announced a decision to lower him in the military rank (to vice admiral) and dismiss him from the Armed Forces without the right to reinstate.”

[shadow]

Why are you afraid of that?

[kil 31]

It is interesting to meet with such a monster, we have preparatory courses for them. Marinescu?

[combin23]

How many torpedo hits can such a boat withstand?

[zennon]

Quote: kombin23

How many torpedo hits can such a boat withstand?

depending on what ...

[sir_obs]

This is how lucky. During World War II, a British aircraft carrier was sunk by one torpedo, but in order to drown the Japanese battleship Yamato, it took 12 torpedoes and two dozen hits of heavy bombs, it remained afloat for another 2 hours and continued to move. It’s enough torpedoes with SBC, enough to gouge thoroughly not only the aircraft carrier, but also its group.
And why torpedoes, if the rocket flies further and more precisely?

[ametist415]

The Russians laugh at the Americans, yes, they are enemies, but the military people and the designers of the American fleet should be respected. Staying at them is a sign of a narrow-minded mind, the level of Bendera, the essence is the same. They are strong guys, if necessary, they can stand up for themselves. For example, it is known that the American submarine drowned the Kursk submarine and it is very sad that the American commander saw the Russian regiment, but the Russian most likely did not, and the American calmly left for the base. We simply could not find him and make him swim. Often the Russians manage to set fire to their ships and ships for repairs and after that they laugh at the Americans, it's somehow silly. I hope the commanders of the ships and the designer understand this and respect the enemy, otherwise there will be a defeat.

[padded jacket]

Quote: ametist415

For example, it is known that the American submarine drowned the Kursk submarine and it is very sad that the American commander saw the Russian regiment, but the Russian most likely did not, and the American calmly left for the base

Well, nonsense.
They themselves composed or who suggested?

[Yves762]

Quote: quilted jacket

Well, nonsense.
They themselves composed or who suggested?

No ... What are you!
Will refer to the classics. Psaki for example ...

[Setrac]

Quote: ametist415

The Russians laugh at the Americans, yes, they are enemies, but military people and designers of the American Navy should be respected.

A modern warship - a missile, an aircraft carrier - is a ship of the Second World War, I see no reason to respect. If Americans would build rocket ships with the same zeal ...?

[Yves762]

To replace the aircraft carrier "George Washington"Comes to the shores of Japan"Ronald Reagan».

This is such a "subtle" allusion to the change of imperatives in the US attitude towards Japan.?