Military Review

Signs and symbols of the Victory Parade

34


The older the statehood of a given people, the more signs and symbols it carries история. The preservation of historical memory, the protection of signs and symbols of the traditions and history of the people is the most important function of the state and the responsible part of society (the national elite). To destroy the people, enough to trample its history. And when children and grandchildren forget the exploits of their fathers and grandfathers, they will not even understand that they have become traitors to their people - and therefore, themselves.

The 9 parade of May 2015 of the year on Red Square, dedicated to the 70 anniversary of the Great Victory over the German (and, in fact, Anglo-Saxon - sponsors and their performers) fascism, presented to the world many signs and symbols. Those to whom they were addressed, they were seen and heard ...

Closed scenery Lenin Mausoleum

Signs and symbols of the Victory Parade


Defense Minister S. Shoigu made the sign of the cross to the camera



Meaning of these signs

The red project is not considered by the leadership of Russia as the ideological basis of our development. The thousand-year history of the statehood of Russia under the signs of Orthodoxy and autocracy is in bad agreement with the communist symbols, imposed on us by the West.

The decision was made a long time ago, and, in my opinion, the decision is correct: The red project is our tragic and at the same time glorious great story. But the further development of Russia under the red banner is "inexpedient", however unpleasant it may sound for real (without quotes) patriots of Russia, who sincerely believe that "Marx's doctrine is omnipotent because it is true."

And with China, and with other countries, without exception, modern Russia will not build relations on any supranational "Universal" organizational and ideological basis such as the Comintern or gosdepovskih institutions of "freedom and democracy" and the network of NGOs around the world. It is this sign that was sent to all who equally wants to build a relationship with us that Russia will not impose "your charter" on anyone (or their ideology, as it was not so long ago, when some African cannibal dictator declared his country a socialist country, and immediately received for this from our elderly Politburo Tanks, Armored personnel carriers, Kalash, and, of course, currency - for the "development of socialism").

Parade calculations of the allies of Russia



Participation in the Parade of parade calculations from friendly powers that were held in this order: Azerbaijan, Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan - the republics of the former USSR; India, Mongolia, Serbia, China are our closest allies.

For Azerbaijan and Armenia, this is a very important and significant event. The wise leaders of these states - I. Aliyev and S. Sargsyan - understand and do everything to ensure that hostility between two nations, which for centuries together, side by side (in cities and villages) lived peacefully in the territory of the Russian Empire, and then the USSR gone to no. This hostility is organized and paid for by the West, for which friendship between neighboring nations violates one of the main conditions for the existence of Western civilization - “divide and rule”.

Closes Allied column ceremonial calculation of the PLA. Not alphabetically. And by value. The meaning of this sign must be understood as follows: "We will cover you, you can count on us."

In general, the participation of foreign ceremonial calculations in Moscow on Red Square (and no matter for what reason) suggests that Russia can quick and easy to turn on all their gigantic opportunities (even without resorting to a mobilization economy), and herself translate from the status of a regional power (where we themselves themselves and defined 25 years ago ... Well, so wanted!) in the status of world power (just got sick be a regional power).

PRC Chairman Xi Jinping



The most honorable place in the Parade for the Chinese guest, the chairman of the People's Republic of China and the secretary general of the CPC Central Committee, on Putin’s right hand, does not in itself carry any special meanings. But the thing is that this time the other guests of the heads of state were seated away from this couple and additionally “diluted” by Soviet generals-veterans of the Great Patriotic War. And only two state leaders sat next pair - Putin and Xi Jinping. Without a doubt, it was a sign, and it was sent to our overseas and not very partners: Russia and China are ready to jointly expand their areas of influence, and of course, at the expense of Western countries.

The West made a mistake: more recently both Russia and China were ready to join the club of the Western powers as junior partners. But PARTNERS! But the West considered that Russia and China would manage (and wipe out) without partner status (they wanted to let us expend, that is, to use countries and peoples as a consumable material for maintaining their global domination).

Once, exactly 70 years ago, the world was already divided between two players - the USA and the USSR. And about five years before that, it had never occurred to ANYONE that such a situation would in principle be possible.
This is a sign to those who still doubt that the story develops progressively and does not end in any FukUyam.

Army General Mahmoud Gareyev



Few people paid attention ... During the passage of the column of the legendary T-34 tanks and SAU-100 self-propelled guns in the camera lens of the live broadcast of the parade of military equipment appeared Army General Makhmut Akhmetovich Gareevsitting on the left hand of GDP. The state television camera on this day did not show the viewers of the whole world JUST SO. So General Gareev is not a simple general, but the main confidant of the President of the Russian Federation on the military history of the Great Patriotic War and its results.

For reference from Wikipedia:
“I became actively involved in military science work back in 60-70-s. He is the author of over 100 scientific papers, over 300 articles and publications in collections, journals, newspapers. Wrote books “Tactical teachings and maneuvers”, “M. V. Frunze - military theorist "," Combined arms exercises "," Ambiguous pages of war "," My last war ".
After creating the Academy of Military Sciences, a non-governmental research organization in February 1995, he was elected its president. Much engaged in the study of the history of the Great Patriotic War. He actively participates in scientific discussions, opposes falsification of the history of war. He believes that the desire to challenge the Soviet victory over fascism is closely linked to the propaganda campaign against modern Russia. Thousands of previously unknown documents about the war were put into circulation in scientific collections edited by Gareev. Served in the transfer of "Directive number 1 - War."

The one who was at least a little interested in the alternative, not official history of the Second World War, is well acquainted with the writer-historian Viktor Suvorov (Vladimir Rezun), who, "looking from London", successfully popularized in 90 and in 2000 in Russian and for Russian readers the main imperative of the West is that Stalin’s Russia is no better than Hitler’s Germany: Ledokol is a documentary-publicistic book by Viktor Suvorov, in which it is argued using the argument that the USSR was preparing an invasion of Germany in July 1941, and, having unleashed the Great Patriotic War, Hitler had only anticipated Soviet aggressive plans.

The writer V. Suvorov often referred to General M. Gareev as his main opponent in the history of the beginning of the Second World War.

These signs - Red Square, Victory Parade, Putin and Gareyev - need to be understood only as “You are trying in vain”: the Supreme Commander attaches special importance to the historical memory of the Russian people. And the times when the samizdat works of A. Solzhenitsyn and the giant official circulations of V. Suvorov (Rezun) walked along the hands of Soviet and Russian citizens will never return. We will no longer allow hanging noodles of Western anti-Russian propaganda on our territory.

This is also the answer to those of our “patriots”, who cannot calm down in any way, that Russia does not have its own ideology, its own national idea like that of the USSR.

There are immutable for all nations traditional (conservative) values: family, children, older generation, homeland, morality, ethics, beauty, respect, love, sacrifice - in the name of preserving all these values ​​... So why did the gentlemen-comrades "patriots" reproach Putin for not accepting " slaughter "for arming against all bad and for all good ideology, the main goal of which is the final victory over the enemies of Russia?

My answer to the "patriots" is: there can be no "final" victory of good over evil. Can't win the night day. You can not divide the magnet into "plus" and "minus". Life cannot overcome death ... But to destroy the people "for all good" for the gentlemen-patriots is a sacred cause ... Bolshevism, especially in its extremely painful form as Trotskyism (with whom Comrade Stalin struggled, for which he is now most reproached and hated by our liberals-at-feed-in-state-department), is completely rejected by the leadership of modern Russia.

The Victory Parade of 9 May 2015, as a multitude of signs and symbols, presented to the whole world a simple and clear answer to all the philosophical-civilizational questions in this topic: Russia carried the XMNUMX “isms” of 20, alien to anyone, and more Russian, in the broad sense of this adjective wordsto the people. We will no longer step on this rake. Do not try.

And if someone else did not understand and will continue to insist ... So much for such, quite intelligible and understandable OTHER signs and symbols of the Parade of our Victory:


Air refueling:






In Russia, the entire military aviation FURTHER ACTION!
Author:
34 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Same lech
    Same lech 18 May 2015 08: 25
    +8
    The Victory Parade on May 9, 2015, like many signs and symbols, presented the whole world with a simple and understandable answer


    The VICTORY parade was successful despite the refusal of our hehe sanctioned partners (in quotation marks) to attend it.

    The main thing is he rallied our people as a single whole ... this is perhaps the most valuable achievement and our veterans and their exploits were a pillar in this matter.
    1. USSR 1971
      USSR 1971 18 May 2015 08: 45
      +16
      Who wanted to come, but the descendants of the Nazi collaborators did not wait. Everything went perfectly. True, the mausoleum I would not curtain. All the same, this is our story and the first victory parade was received from its rostrum. What is ashamed of?
      1. Blondy
        Blondy 18 May 2015 10: 09
        +11
        Quote: USSR 1971
        All the same, this is our story and the first victory parade was received from its rostrum. What is ashamed of?

        Well, he burped slightly liberalism: how did the Bolshevik-Soviet construct - trample the corpse. But, to hell, writing on your History, as against the wind, is contraindicated. There is a very high probability that with a friendly expression of will everything will be restored as it should.
        By the way, something with the renaming of Stalingrad is somehow dragging on, he nevertheless created his HISTORY and entered it. We ought to hint together: Hey, are you up there!
        1. DRA-88
          DRA-88 18 May 2015 11: 42
          +12
          Such articles, trying to find "new" meanings and symbols of Victory, always smell bad.
          Victory in the Great Patriotic War of 1945 has no other symbols except the Red Banner of Victory, Red Square, the Lenin Mausoleum at the foot of which the fascist standards, Stalin, Zhukov, the SOVIET PEOPLE OF THE WINNER were thrown !!!
          The author is trying to replace the meaning of Victory.
          The baptized minister ... is that a symbol? Well this is not Easter! and do not see the tsarist army ....
          It is clear that the new government is trying to erase from the minds of people, especially the younger generation, the true symbols of Victory, inextricably linked with Soviet Power. Logo for the 70th anniversary of Victory, new standards with monograms, ruffles and mutated chickens instead of Combat Banners of units and formations, similar to the famous "birds" in red aprones, dressed up "Transfiguration" regiments (what are they generally related to Victory?), A three-color star and the Vlasov banner, are these symbols of Victory?
          Then give up the Soviet technology hovering in the skies over Moscow and refuel in the air on "Ilya Muromets", and take the parade on "RussoBalts", and instead of "Kalash" go with Japanese and English vintars from the beginning of the last century, weak?
          1. DRA-88
            DRA-88 18 May 2015 11: 49
            +9
            Here are the Symbols of Victory !!!
            1. DRA-88
              DRA-88 18 May 2015 11: 50
              +7
              Other Symbols WILL NOT be, while we are alive !!!
        2. taram taramych
          taram taramych 18 May 2015 13: 26
          +3
          For Stalingrad, with two hands!
    2. Owl27
      Owl27 18 May 2015 08: 48
      +5
      Nobody noticed their absence, they watched from the underwear live, the signs read --- Merkel and Kerry rushed.
      Go Russia!!!!
      1. Veteran of the Red Army
        Veteran of the Red Army 18 May 2015 09: 12
        +15
        Quote: Owl27
        ... Merkel and Kerry rushed ...


        Merkel's memory at the genetic level works well ...
        Hands remember what is needed ...
        1. rotmistr60
          rotmistr60 18 May 2015 09: 26
          +3
          Very good shot and in the subject. And she looks so even better than behind the podium.
          1. Babr
            Babr 18 May 2015 11: 40
            +9
            Defense Minister S. Shoigu made the sign of the cross to the camera

            I don’t know, maybe I'm so flawed that I don’t understand something.
            It looks like a performance where the actors yesterday, stunning party tickets and sparkling Komsomol badges, quickly prevailed and are now humbly baptized.
            I can understand those whom life so pecked so that they remembered God.
            These buffoons are not.
            1. Blondy
              Blondy 18 May 2015 12: 51
              +1
              Quote: Babr
              Defense Minister S. Shoigu made the sign of the cross to the camera

              Well, it’s clear to the hedgehog that everything has been worked out precisely for the camera, not the main thing here is that it is a symbol of one’s, Russian succession, both from the Soviet and the tsar’s army, how to serve the motherland.
              One must be too naive to think that the vast majority of historical symbols were created somehow very differently.
              1. Babr
                Babr 18 May 2015 17: 15
                +3
                To serve the motherland ........
                And without such antics, can it be served?
            2. Karabanov
              Karabanov 18 May 2015 13: 57
              +4
              Quote: Babr
              Defense Minister S. Shoigu made the sign of the cross to the camera

              It looked too far-fetched and ridiculous ...
              I don’t know what religion the Minister of Defense may be, he may also be a baptized Tuvinian, but excuse me, it seems like a cheap performance.
              This feeling intensified after an inconsistent conversation between Putin (in my opinion with the Cossack commander), and Shoigu's obvious discontent over this. The rules were suddenly violated ... But apparently the warriors had no other case to appeal to the president personally. It seemed to me personally (jumped over my head).
          2. jdcjd
            jdcjd 18 May 2015 14: 17
            +1
            Genetic memory, so to speak
          3. Alexey Boukin
            Alexey Boukin 18 May 2015 14: 39
            0
            Many of our democrats doubt the feasibility of holding grandiose Parades, like the one held on Red Square, explaining that this is not practiced anywhere in the world. In my opinion, this Parade rallied the peoples of Russia even more and, most importantly, our children, who personally saw this triumph, will remember the victory over fascism.
  2. polite people
    polite people 18 May 2015 08: 35
    +18
    The main sign of the parade.
  3. saag
    saag 18 May 2015 08: 40
    +19
    "... Lenin's Mausoleum, closed with decorations"

    Yeah, they closed one symbol, but at the same time, the star on the Kremlin tower in the background of the covered mausoleum looks interesting, I would say that the symbol takes the first place in its dominant role

    "... The decision was made a long time ago, and, in my opinion, the decision is correct: the Red Project is our tragic and at the same time glorious great history. But the further development of Russia under the red banner is 'inappropriate'"

    Everything flows, everything changes

    "... There are traditional (conservative) values ​​that are unshakable for all peoples: family, children, the older generation, homeland, morality, ethics, beauty, respect, love, sacrifice - in the name of preserving all these values ​​... So why gentlemen-comrades “Patriots” reproach Putin that he will not accept the “slaughter” for armament against all bad and all good ideology, the main goal of which is the final victory over the enemies of Russia? "

    Values-values, but they are not the way of DEVELOPMENT for society, but ideology is just such a path and implies, for it denotes a global goal, history shows that having such a goal people won all wars, developed themselves and developed the country, without a goal society becomes fragmented, apathetic because it’s not clear where to go, some public actions rally the people for a short time (by the way, they are connected precisely with the period that the current government is trying to avoid with its signs), but it quickly passes

    Summarizing, we can say that the author is trying to convey to his readers his vision of the impossibility of repeating the past even in the new generation, but this is his mistake, because nothing better than a socially just society was invented, and the current liberal capitalism, headed by the main country leader, is precisely an adversary of building such a society.
    1. noWAR
      noWAR 18 May 2015 08: 59
      +3
      Bravo, Saag, I like your comments (not like before). Without a goal, a person and the people (s) wander can be said in the dark, which we CANNOT afford.
    2. tamanski
      18 May 2015 10: 45
      +7
      Stalin began the Red Project. With the fact that he expelled from the country a fiery revolutionary Trotsky and his other supporters. And those who did not understand - much later, in 37-38-m, put to the wall. But it was not Stalin who organized the repressions, but the very uninhabited Trotskyists (the same Khrushchev), who did not succeed in a good way.
      Strengthening the role of the ROC during the Second World War, the return of shoulder straps and the words "officer" - the officer corps - this was a continuation of Stalin's course, the purification of all that superficial "revolutionary" that did not allow us to develop. By the way, private ownership of the means of production under Stalin was not abolished. But the Trotskyist-Ukrainian face of Khrushchev ... then you already know everything.
      1. saag
        saag 18 May 2015 10: 57
        -6
        Quote: tamanski
        Stalin began the Red Project. With the fact that he expelled from the country a fiery revolutionary Trotsky and his other supporters. And those who did not understand - much later, in 37-38-m, put to the wall. But it was not Stalin who organized the repressions, but the very uninhabited Trotskyists (the same Khrushchev), who did not succeed in a good way.

        Well, yes, it was not he, the paranoid fear for his personal power and led him to eliminate those with whom he defended Soviet power in civilian life, who knew something about him or could have popularity among the people, thus encroaching on his personal, nothing he claimed unlimited power and the people's commissars, and this does not end with the 37th year, the second wave of exacerbation began in 1948
      2. dmb
        dmb 18 May 2015 11: 03
        +1
        You are not the author of this opus? Do not tell me, but Stalin, who was building the "red project", was building something. More than once I asked your comrades-in-arms in "thinking", what was Khrushchev's Trotskyism? I could not get an answer from them. Can you tell us? I would also like to hear. how Khrushchev's goal differed from Stalin's. It's always nice to listen to an intelligent person.
        1. Babr
          Babr 18 May 2015 12: 16
          +5
          Quote: dmb
          and what was Khrushchev's Trotskyism?

          Can I answer?
          It was impossible to turn 53rd, immediately turn into 93rd, generational succession was developed. And this is a great power.
          But slowly, with the filing of Khrushchev, this was overcome.
          I said so, in a nutshell ... do you want to continue?
          To the barrier! I will not beat on takeoff.
        2. DRA-88
          DRA-88 18 May 2015 12: 41
          +5
          Quote: dmb
          At the same time I would like to hear. how Khrushchev’s goal was different from Stalin’s. It's always nice to listen to a smart person.

          Hello, dear Dmitry! hi
          You will not hear any answers ... Apart from a set of stamps and cereals in your head regarding dates and events, these citizens have nothing ...
          Sadness ......
          1. dmb
            dmb 18 May 2015 12: 59
            +2
            I greet Vladlen, in fact, I did not have any illusions, well, do not take the comment of the honorable Victor as an answer. To the Hon. You see, dear Victor, you have not answered any of my questions. Try it, then you can get up to the barrier. And then this is not a duel, but fuss in the sandbox.
            1. Babr
              Babr 18 May 2015 13: 27
              +3
              Dim, I think I answered the comments completely.
              The duel did not work out.
              Maybe we have weapons of the wrong brand? what
              1. DRA-88
                DRA-88 18 May 2015 13: 39
                +5
                Quote: Babr
                Maybe we have weapons of the wrong brand?

                1. Babr
                  Babr 18 May 2015 13: 45
                  +2
                  Well, you say, here you are of course on a horse.
                  1. DRA-88
                    DRA-88 18 May 2015 13: 57
                    +4
                    Quote: Babr
                    Well, you say, here you are of course on a horse.

                    Nooo, it is you "on horseback", and We are singing a song!
              2. dmb
                dmb 18 May 2015 14: 54
                +2
                Do not think of it as sarcastic, but I tried to put a question mark. So why Khrushchev is a Trotskyist and from what do you conclude that some of them did not build socialism. (About the fact that Stalin did it, there is a comment below). And when you write your answer, if possible, elucidate why some "Trotskyists" zealously annihilated others instead of all together, not bothering too much to slam a couple of Stalinists who. it turns out they were in the minority.
                1. Babr
                  Babr 18 May 2015 16: 44
                  +2
                  Quote: dmb
                  so that all together not particularly bother to slam a couple of Stalinists who. it turns out, were in the minority.

                  Here you are mistaken.
                  I do not know what it was, or Providence, or His Majesty Chance.
                  But Stalin became a man of recruiting .... and the result is in person.
                  Just do not persuade me for inaccuracies.
                  The simpler, the more intelligible.
                  1. RUSS
                    RUSS 18 May 2015 22: 02
                    0
                    Quote: Babr
                    But Stalin became a man of recruiting

                    And what kind of frames did he leave behind?
                    1. Babr
                      Babr 19 May 2015 01: 14
                      +1
                      Quote: RUSS
                      Quote: Babr
                      But Stalin became a man of recruiting

                      And what kind of frames did he leave behind?

                      Well, probably this is another question.
                      The coup did not happen spontaneously, but well prepared.
                      I do not think that Stalin hoped for eternal life and did not prepare a receiver for himself.
                      Those were not found, to the least extent alive.
                      Most likely it would have been Beria, judging by how much dirt and fables are still pouring on him.
                      PS Forum, not tired of cons scatter quietly?
                      The person asked a question, maybe not very hospitable, but still.

                      Is it necessary to backtrack?
          2. Babr
            Babr 18 May 2015 13: 08
            +3
            Quote: DRA-88
            ... In addition to a set of stamps and cereals in the head regarding dates and events,

            Porridge, this is you, a young suitcase, because besides the cry "Dazdraperma !!!!" You can't do anything.
            20th is that fulfilled?
            1. DRA-88
              DRA-88 18 May 2015 13: 31
              +3
              Quote: Babr
              Porridge, this is you, a young suitcase, because besides the cry "Dazdraperma !!!!" You can't do anything.
              20th is that fulfilled?

              laughing laughing laughing
              Here he is the guardsman of the cardinal, the opportunist is a raider, the knight without fear and reproach laughing
              Leave us alone with DMB, two-member tongue
            2. AzBooks
              AzBooks 18 May 2015 13: 33
              +4
              Quote: Babr
              To the barrier! I will not beat on takeoff.
              Quote: Babr
              Quote: DRA-88

              ... In addition to a set of stamps and cereals in the head regarding dates and events,

              Porridge, this is you, a young suitcase, because besides the cry "Dazdraperma !!!!" You can't do anything.
              20th is that fulfilled?


              What a duel - "Only old men go to battle" - Shakespearean passions are played out here belay Right anyway ...
              Went for popcorn .... wink laughing
              1. DRA-88
                DRA-88 18 May 2015 13: 37
                +3
                Quote: AzBooks
                Went for popcorn ....

                Wait, miss all the fun laughing
                Get healed with spiritual food, and don’t think about popcorn, comrade! wink
              2. Babr
                Babr 18 May 2015 13: 53
                +1
                Quote: AzBooks
                Went for popcorn ....

                Oh well, I wanted to stretch my legs, but here they giggled from head to toe.
                I give up.
                1. DRA-88
                  DRA-88 18 May 2015 14: 13
                  +2
                  Quote: Babr
                  Oh well, I wanted to stretch myself

                  Train on the cats laughing
                  1. Babr
                    Babr 18 May 2015 14: 16
                    +1
                    I will remember those "cats"
        3. Alexey RA
          Alexey RA 18 May 2015 13: 06
          +7
          Quote: dmb
          Do not tell me, but Stalin, who was building the "red project", was building something.

          Socialism in a single country. Including - through cooperation with the capitalists. With the transition from open export of revolution "on bayonets" to export of ideas.
          For which he was repeatedly called a counterrevolutionary, a compromiser with imperialism, a grave digger of the revolution, a traitor to the cause of the October Revolution, etc., etc. Citizen Trotsky would have come up with other terms - but the IVS was tired of this discussion, and he, using the admin rights, banned his opponent.
          1. AzBooks
            AzBooks 18 May 2015 13: 50
            +8
            Quote: Alexey RA
            Socialism in a single country. Including - through cooperation with the capitalists. With the transition from open export of revolution "on bayonets" to export of ideas.


            Well, just kind grandfather was Comrade Stalin. I decided not to create a bayonet, but to create a world revolution with the idea. Yeah.
            And in my opinion, Stalin, through "cooperation with the capitalists", built the material and technical basis of communism, without which, just as Trotsky wanted, with bayonets alone, the world revolution could not be accomplished.
            Stalin understood that the time had come for the motors, and Trotsky was still shaking the gun on the barricade, sweeping his throat, and in his experience he waved a civilian saber.
            Stalin realized that an industrial base and organization were needed, and this was time and technology, while Trotsky wanted to fight "here and now" by throwing the population of Russia into the furnace of the world revolution.
            History judged who was right, and Mercader put an end to it ... Ice ax.
            1. Alexey RA
              Alexey RA 18 May 2015 16: 45
              +4
              Quote: AzBooks
              Well, just kind grandfather was Comrade Stalin. I decided not to create a bayonet, but to create a world revolution with the idea. Yeah.
              And in my opinion, Stalin, through "cooperation with the capitalists", built the material and technical basis of communism, without which, just as Trotsky wanted, with bayonets alone, the world revolution could not be accomplished.

              Why guess? There are words of Stalin himself:
              We are 50-100 years behind advanced countries. We must make good this distance in ten years. Either we do it, or they crush us.

              In the late 20s and 30s, it was not a question of creating the material and technical base of communism. And about survival the world's first state of workers and peasants.
              For until the end of the 30s, even Poland was a comparable enemy for us. And the war with the Poland-Romania-Finland coalition was already seen as a "big war."
              1. Uncle Joe
                Uncle Joe 19 May 2015 01: 29
                +3
                Quote: Alexey RA
                Why guess? There are words of Stalin himself:
                We are 50-100 years behind advanced countries. We must make good this distance in ten years. Either we do it, or they crush us.

                In the late 20s and 30s, it was not a question of creating the material and technical base of communism. And about survival the world's first state of workers and peasants.
                Have you tried to read the context of the quote?

                In the past, we did not have and could not have a fatherland. But now that we have overthrown capitalism, and we, the people have power, we have a fatherland and we will defend its independence. Do you want our socialist fatherland to be beaten and to lose its independence? But if you do not want this, you must as soon as possible eliminate its backwardness and develop the real Bolshevik pace in building its socialist economy. There are no other ways. That is why Lenin said on the eve of October: "Either death, or catch up and overtake the advanced capitalist countries."
                We are 50-100 years behind advanced countries. We must make good this distance in ten years. Either we do it, or they crush us.
                This is what our obligations to the workers and peasants of the USSR dictate to us.
                But we still have other, more serious and more important obligations. These are obligations to the world proletariat. They coincide with the obligations of the first kind. But we put them higher. The working class of the USSR is part of the world working class. We won not only through the efforts of the working class of the USSR, but also thanks to the support of the world working class. Without such support, we would have been pecked for a long time. They say that our country is the shock brigade of the proletariat of all countries. That is well said. But this imposes serious obligations on us. For what is the international proletariat supporting us, how have we earned such support? By the fact that we were the first to rush into the battle with capitalism, we were the first to establish workers' power, we were the first to build socialism. By the fact that we are doing a job that, if successful, will turn the whole world over and free the whole working class. And what is required for success? The elimination of our backwardness, the development of high, Bolshevik pace of construction. We must move forward so that the working class of the whole world, looking at us, can say: here it is, my forward detachment, here it is, my shock brigade, here it is, my working power, here it is, my fatherland - they are doing their business, our business is good — support them against the capitalists and inflate the cause of the world revolution.
          2. saag
            saag 18 May 2015 14: 05
            0
            Quote: Alexey RA
            With the transition from open export of revolution "on bayonets" to export of ideas.

            This, by the way, is one and the same thing, and in Germany in 1919 it quite happened, as a result of which the German troops left the territory of the former RI to themselves
            1. Alexey RA
              Alexey RA 18 May 2015 15: 55
              0
              Quote: saag
              This, by the way, is one and the same thing, and in Germany in 1919 it quite happened, as a result of which the German troops left the territory of the former RI to themselves

              Not the same thing.
              The export of ideas is ideological pressure on the country and financing of "local comrades" in order to change the regime by local forces (then, if necessary, troops can be sent in).
              And the export of revolution is a direct military invasion with the goal of changing the existing system.
      3. Aleksandr1959
        Aleksandr1959 18 May 2015 12: 42
        +3
        If Stalin had not removed Trotsky and others like him, who were for the world revolution, and had not focused on "building socialism in a single country," then the Big White Polar Fox would have come to the USSR even under Stalin.
        Strengthening the role of the ROC during the Second World War, the return of shoulder straps and the words "officer" - the officer corps - this was a continuation of Stalin's course, the purification of all that superficial "revolutionary" that did not allow us to develop. By the way, private ownership of the means of production under Stalin was not abolished. But the Trotskyist-Ukrainian face of Khrushchev ... then you already know everything.


        Yes, Stalin got rid of a certain layer of "true Bolshevik-Leninists" who imagined themselves to be cooler than hard-boiled eggs and began to live ... already as under communism (remember Larisa Reisner's champagne baths). Were removed people who came to the revolution by accident.
        Was there a "military conspiracy" ... hell knows. But Stalin got rid of not the best representatives of the army.
        Under Stalin, consumer cooperation was also widely developed.
        О
        it seemed that under Stalin, entrepreneurship - in the form of production and craft cooperatives - was supported in every way possible. Already in the first five-year plan, a 2,6-fold increase in the number of artel members was planned. At the very beginning of 1941, the Council of People's Commissars and the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks (b) issued a special decree “giving hands” to zealous leaders interfering in the activities of the cooperatives, emphasizing the mandatory election leadership of industrial cooperation at all levels, for two years enterprises were exempted from most taxes and state control over retail pricing - the only and indispensable condition was that retail prices should not exceed state prices for similar products by more than 10-13% (and this despite the fact that state-owned enterprises were in more difficult conditions: they did not have benefits). And so that officials were not tempted to “squeeze” the artisans, the government also determined the prices at which the artels were provided with raw materials, equipment, storage places, transport, retail facilities: corruption was impossible in principle. And even during the war years, half of the tax benefits were saved for the cooperatives, and after the war they were granted more than in the 41st year, especially to the cooperatives of the disabled, who became numerous after the war ... In difficult post-war years, the development of cooperatives was considered the most important state task.

        A.K. Trubitsyn: About Stalin and Entrepreneurs

        http://anticomprador.ru/publ/a_k_trubicyn_o_staline_i_predprinimateljakh/29-1-0-
        1065

        And the Victory Parade of 2015 became one of the symbols of Russia's gaining power.
        And what color will the project "Russia" be ... if only not blue or pink? wassat
        1. Babr
          Babr 18 May 2015 12: 59
          +6
          Quote: Aleksandr1959
          And what color will the project "Russia" be ... if only not blue or pink?

          Isn’t it clear?
          Red is painted over with white, for some reason white ribbons are immediately remembered,
          and blue ........
          The tale is a lie, but there is a hint in it ......
        2. saag
          saag 18 May 2015 14: 08
          -4
          Quote: Aleksandr1959
          If Stalin had not removed Trotsky and others like him, who were for the world revolution, and had not focused on "building socialism in a single country," then the Big White Polar Fox would have come to the USSR even under Stalin.

          Well, this is your personal opinion, but if Stalin had not ruined the top command staff, then the losses in the war would have been much less thanks to the experienced leadership.
          1. Aleksandr1959
            Aleksandr1959 18 May 2015 14: 16
            +2
            But this is your personal opinion. And it’s too early to put an end to this matter.
            Read the first order of Beria as the People's Commissar of Internal Affairs of the USSR.

            http://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/2189356.html

            In general, such documents show well both the scale of the excesses of the times of Yezhovism and the systematic work aimed at returning repression to an adequate channel. What is funny, despite the fact that the bulk of the abuses and crimes committed by the state security agencies fell on Yezhov's time, Beria was appointed the main "bloody executioner" for some reason, who just raked the consequences of "Yezhovism", sending to execution a significant percentage of figures in whose The work of the NKVD revealed serious "shortcomings and perversions."


            By the way, the document is extremely important in terms of understanding how the state assessed excesses during the repression. In fact, even during the period of mass repressions, the state openly admitted that serious violations and perversions were committed during their conduct, which refutes the myth that everyone who was imprisoned and who was shot was to blame, and on the other hand, it destroys the perestroika myth that that "the truth about the repressions was concealed and hushed up" and only honest dissidents "brought Bloody Gebnya to the surface

            From the same message
            1. saag
              saag 18 May 2015 14: 27
              0
              Quote: Aleksandr1959
              bring repression back on track

              in granite :-)
              1. Babr
                Babr 18 May 2015 15: 14
                +1
                I agree.
                I do not see an adequate channel
            2. Aleksandr1959
              Aleksandr1959 18 May 2015 15: 53
              +5
              And I’ll add a little. How many people were repressed by the Khrushchev junta, how many people were killed by the Khrushchev junta? Here is just one name, if it says something to you, Pavel Sudoplatov.
              There are very few answers to this question, there are practically no materials in the open press.
              Materials only about the so-called "Khrushchev thaw", about the debunking of the "cult of Stalin's personality."
              How many areas in science and technology begun under Stalin were covered by Khrushchev. One defeat of aviation dealt a tremendous blow to the defense of the USSR.
              The defeat of consumer cooperation is also on the conscience of Khrushchev and others like him.
              My opinion is that the Twentieth Congress of the CPSU was only for Khrushchev to otmazatsya from repression, in the organization of which he played a significant role.
              Our liberalists are trying to keep silent about this.
              The 90s of the collapse of Russia are presented as the pinnacle of democracy. And the fact that the people had nothing to eat ... were silent .... But now the mouths were broken. Totalitarianism .... Yes, under totalitarianism, they would have sawed pine long ago with a jigsaw.
              1. Babr
                Babr 18 May 2015 17: 05
                +3
                Quote: Aleksandr1959
                Our liberals are trying to keep silent about this.

                We are rushing here with these words. And who is in power then?
                The same liberalists.
                They only singled out the "whipping boys"
                They threw a bone to the people, nibble.
                And we will calmly do our business.
                1. Aleksandr1959
                  Aleksandr1959 18 May 2015 22: 07
                  +1
                  Those, but not really. There is our so-called "creative and other intelligentsia", which believes that it is the honor and conscience of the country. And what socio-political system was not ... everyone owes her in life. Her business is to indicate how the country should live, the business of the Government and the supreme leader (Tsar or President ...) to rule according to their rules, the business of the people is to plow ...
                  I don’t remember who wrote the poem ... but this is clearly not about this audience.

                  There is a Russian intelligentsia, there is
                  Not mass indifferent,
                  And the country's conscience and honor ...

                  And finally, a quote from the excellent science fiction writer R.V. Zlotnikov
                  "Well, there are people in life who are almost incapable of anything, but all their failures are blamed exclusively on someone else: the authorities, bosses, stupid colleagues, moronic relatives, an idiotic country ... and so on. Sometimes, if their tongues are hanging well, they even begin to enjoy some authority, because their grandioseness and imaginary uncompromisingness obscure their eyes, but, in fact, they are nothing, a hole from the toilet bowl.
                  She makes a loud noise at the moment when they merge .... just like these gentlemen. Moreover, despite all their cries, it is quite simple to recognize them. They do nothing. They only shake the air with angry speeches. All their authority is built not on deeds, not on something that is built, launched, working, but on criticism and denunciations.
                  Do not create, but stop creation. Under any pretext!
                  Ecology, violation of someone’s rights, the salvation of something unique - a lake, forest, cultural monument .. and so on. The main thing is to stop, do not let do, find what to blame the builder and brake it forever.
                  Having rejected the chance of action itself, to find new and new flaws in other, new warrants .... and stand, stand, stand.
                  Then success, then victory. Well, if you didn’t succeed, well, it’s enough to look around and see who is still trying to do at least something .... Ah, here he is - here he is, .. he is an enemy ... !!! "

                  R.V.Zlotnikov "Earthling"
    3. tantalum
      tantalum 18 May 2015 14: 18
      +1
      Quote: saag
      for nothing better than a socially just society was invented, and the current liberal capitalism, with the country's main leader, is precisely the opponent of building such a society.

      Surprised +
      1. Babr
        Babr 18 May 2015 15: 04
        +3
        Quote: Tantal
        Surprised +

        Why wonder here?
        Each has its own "truth"
        Putting them together we get the truth.
        But only when we listen to each other, to each other
  4. V. Samodelkin
    V. Samodelkin 18 May 2015 08: 54
    +8
    And I would like to note one more sign that the Commander-in-Chief of the Air Force Viktor Bondarev personally headed the air group of the Victory Parade!
    This, it seems to me, is another proof that the command is not staff polished generals, but people who are able to lead people by example.
    1. ssergn
      ssergn 18 May 2015 11: 09
      +3
      Yes, it looked gorgeous and took pride straight - the Air Force commander in the cockpit! And the truth is that they are used to seeing the current generality in cabinets.
      1. Aleksandr1959
        Aleksandr1959 18 May 2015 14: 15
        +1
        On May 9, 1995, Air Force Commander Petr Stepanovich Deinekin, on a Tu-160 aircraft, led the formation of an air parade over Moscow in honor of the 50th anniversary of the Great Victory.
        Tradition!!!!
  5. Gardamir
    Gardamir 18 May 2015 09: 00
    +8
    Is tricolor a Russian symbol? Brought by Peter from Holland. Even the two-headed is not entirely Russian. Isn't presidential democracy a Western invention? You want to destroy our immediate past with the help of mythologized tsarist history. After all, this Red Project won that war, but you have already crossed it out. My father was not a St. George, but he deserved the Order of the Red Star. The article is both duplicitous and incomprehensible. Starting against the Red Project, the author is suddenly for Stalin, but against patriots, not liberals. The author are you with whom?
    1. Ayujak
      Ayujak 18 May 2015 09: 26
      +4
      Yes you are right. The main thing is not the symbols, but the people who stand behind them. The same swastika is a symbol taken and remade from Buddhism, which has corrupted this peaceful symbol. And the star, and the mausoleum, and the tricolor, and the double-headed eagle, and the St. George ribbon, and others - all these symbols are united in their message - these are people who make the country what it is. We are the descendants of those people who created these symbols. Were it not for them - there would be no symbols, but there would be no us. So we are part of these characters.
      1. Gardamir
        Gardamir 18 May 2015 09: 42
        +2
        The main thing is not the characters
        I remembered. Classes in one of the Black Sea cities about 30 years ago. The port is visible from the audience window. A bulk carrier with a reverse Nazi swastika enters the port. For us Soviet people it was a shock. But the teacher, having fairly traveled around the world, said that there are places where the swastika has a different meaning.
    2. tamanski
      18 May 2015 11: 01
      +9
      The red project won the 17 year. And in World War II, Soviet soldiers (not Red Army soldiers), officers (not Red commanders), generals and marshals, led by Generalissimo Stalin, defeated. They defended neither the communist system nor the communist ideology. They defended their homeland.
      One version of Stalin's death is poisoning. Stalin wanted to reform the CPSU, deprive it of economic power in the country. And to strengthen the role of the soviets as an organ of popular democracy as opposed to party nomenclature ...
      1. saag
        saag 18 May 2015 14: 09
        -3
        Quote: tamanski
        One version of Stalin's death is poisoning.

        Yeah, and according to this version, the poisoner - Beria - had all the possibilities and motive.
    3. ssergn
      ssergn 18 May 2015 11: 18
      +4
      Our people won the Second World War, however pathetic it sounded! After all, the project is not a winner, the people are the winner. This is our people who gave more than 20 million lives, not a project. And against the abomination of fascism, it does not matter under what banner to go - whether red, white, green. No matter. Now it’s white and blue-red, what kind of homeland will you not go under this flag if such trouble happens again, God forbid, of course? So I think that you will go, like the vast majority of the inhabitants of the site. First of all, I’ll go for my mother, for my father, for my son, wife, for family and friends, and just for my piece of land. Something like this.
  6. w3554152
    w3554152 18 May 2015 09: 09
    0
    Tell me, what kind of machine do the Chinese have in the parade?
    1. saag
      saag 18 May 2015 09: 14
      0
      Quote: w3554152
      Tell me, what kind of machine do the Chinese have in the parade?

      AK according to the bullpup scheme, Belarusians seemed to be developing at one time, but it didn’t work, and most likely the drawings were sent to the Chinese
    2. marshes
      marshes 18 May 2015 10: 01
      +1
      5.8x42mm machine gun QBZ-95
      http://world.guns.ru/assault/ch/type-95--qbz-95-r.html
  7. fomkin
    fomkin 18 May 2015 10: 28
    +3
    The author did not say clearly, why bashfully sheathed the main symbol of the country so as not to irritate the huckster? Suddenly, people wake up and ask where is the money Zin? Now on. The aircraft equipment shown in the pictures was made in the USSR. The mausoleum of the founder of the USSR behind the screen, and demonstrate the technology. Where is the logic? Everything that we have is obliged to Lenin and Stalin.

    And this is about modern ideology.
    1. jaguarstas
      jaguarstas 18 May 2015 11: 13
      +5
      Actually

      1st place in the world in terms of absolute population decline - Rhodesia.
      1st place in the world in terms of intentional killings and road accidents - Egypt
      1st place in the world in terms of human trafficking - Saudi Arabia.
      1st place in the world for the consumption of heroin (Afghanistan), tobacco (Mexico), alcohol (Finland) and instant coffee (who did not find here)
      1st place in the world for teenage suicides and suicides of retirees - Norway (Or Sweden. Depending on the year. They take each other first place every year)
      1st place in the world in the number of divorces, abortions - here the United Kingdom and France butt for the championship
      1st place in the world in the number of pedophiles - the Netherlands, yeah.
      1st place in the world in mortality from cardiovascular disease and cancer - the United States, by the way. Since the 70s, by a wide margin, it has been a leader in cancer, heart attacks and strokes.
      1st place in the world in the number of mentally ill - USA. There, even with a mild degree of alcoholism, they are put in a mental hospital and recognized as mentally ill. They de jure considered more than 20 million people.
      1st place in the world in time spent on communication on social networks - Hehe. The American segment of LiveJournal, Facebook and Twitter surpasses even the European ones at times :)

      PS And for the defeatist mood of Marshal Fomkin they can also shoot :-)
      1. Roshchin
        Roshchin 18 May 2015 14: 12
        +1
        Where does the digit come from? Did you consider it yourself?
      2. The comment was deleted.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  8. Dude
    Dude 18 May 2015 10: 39
    +1
    It's a pity the T-50 was not ((I was so expecting to see it ...
  9. Stas57
    Stas57 18 May 2015 10: 49
    +1
    this May 9 holiday was the Strongest, most memorable, brightest in recent 25 years! I have not seen such jubilation, such a unity of the people, such a massive sincere celebration at the parade, at the Immortal regiment, at festivities. Probably only in childhood, by the hand of a grandfather with a veteran, in the distant 80, it can be compared.
    One PSU for half a million is just what it costs!
    Thanks to all of us that we could!
  10. loaln
    loaln 18 May 2015 11: 22
    +4
    Science-like crap! Explain in the same vehement and detailed manner, where during the Great Patriotic War the symbolism that you now loved so much was used? And by whom, the most important thing? Or is it inconsequential? After all, it marked the beginning of the Red Project. So deify them too. Why are you shy. So, how to see which heirs and which participants of the Second World War took the parade. If they are just as hot against the Red Project. Indeed, the scarlet color of Victory on May 9, 1945 was not enough. To insult. And there was no Order of Victory. So whose victory was the parade dedicated to? THE USSR? It was not visible. It was only heard partially. It is surprising that sometimes the Soviet people were mentioned.
    So, in 1945, the parade ranks were equal to the Mausoleum, and now? - On a three-color props. What does it mean? This is not only the end of the Red Project.
  11. Blondy
    Blondy 18 May 2015 12: 17
    +1
    Quote: DRA-88
    The baptized minister ... is that a symbol? Well this is not Easter! and do not see the tsarist army ....

    This is a unifying symbol of the new Russian army, which has absorbed the due homeland from both the Soviet and the tsarist army.
  12. ASK505
    ASK505 18 May 2015 12: 56
    0
    "Signs and symbols rule the world, not words or law." These words are attributed to the ancient Chinese philosopher Confucius.
    State symbols are soldiers on the battlefield yesterday, today, and tomorrow. They cannot be betrayed and followed by those who achieve this under various pretexts. Because our life is structured in such a way that all our thoughts and decisions are formed around symbols and myths - this is a property of human consciousness. We perceive symbols even when we do not notice them. Heraldry, banknotes, architecture, urban planning, painting, theater, literature and music - all based on symbolism and myths. It shapes our personalities and our society. This is our matrix, our foundation and the key to our life on Earth. What you look at is what you turn to.
  13. ASK505
    ASK505 18 May 2015 12: 59
    +4
    Change the state symbols on the Kremlin towers to a Mercedes star or the Coca-Cola logo, and the city will slowly begin to degrade first in consciousness and then personally. And the symbol “Kalashnikov” gives strength and confidence in the battle with just one name. What will happen if Kalashnikov under the guise of "improvement" is renamed to some ABC-21? It will cease to be reliable and reliable even at the beginning of consciousness. The world-famous name and symbol are created for decades by the labor of the whole country, often with blood. So they write and rewrite memory on a clean sheet, so they intercept consciousness control. This is also a form of aggression of the “friends” of Russia through its creature with the goal of erasing the memory of the people and cultivating the generation of Ivanov Nepomnyashchi for future “Maidans”. The interception in control of consciousness begins with the interception of control of symbols. With this technique, the West makes a bookmark in the minds of young people that you did not have achievements in the aircraft industry, you just started something there, in the taiga, next to the bear to "sculpt" from our Avia-Lego. That is, we know how much% of the foreign component Super Jet has and in the press this is no, no, and it will slip “imperceptibly”. Sabotage, i.e. sanctions in various forms have not yet been canceled. Fight for world markets by any means.
  14. GOgaRu
    GOgaRu 18 May 2015 13: 50
    -1
    The article is propaganda nonsense.
  15. VB
    VB 18 May 2015 19: 17
    +1
    The appearance of Kerry in Sochi and Nuland means one thing. In the army, and most importantly among the people, the West saw high morale. Millions around the world in the "IMMORTAL REGION" have clearly demonstrated this. And the West got scared. It was from that moment that they realized that victory over Russia was impossible under any circumstances. Moral spirit was noted by Lev Tolstoy: “for the first time near Borodino, the hand of the strongest enemy was imposed.” The count knew what he was writing. But don't rest on your laurels. The West will try to deceive and calm down Russian society, bribe the fifth column further, and most importantly, a new round of struggle for our youth will begin. Here we must not lose for nothing. They will also use nationalism and separatism with renewed vigor. They will not regret any money, not any! They understand perfectly well that it is better to pour billions than pay in blood, and even to no avail. Little Vietnam, with a high motivated, almost without weapons, brought them to their knees. And here will be a bloody one-way walk. The West perfectly understood everything on May 9. Now they will only lie and pay crazy money to destroy the country and overpower everyone
  16. okroshka79
    okroshka79 19 May 2015 01: 00
    +1
    In vain, of course, the Lenin Mausoleum was closed, even with festive symbols, of an incomprehensible architectural structure made of plywood. I do not like to stand on the rostrum of the mausoleum, set up the rostrum in front of the mausoleum, it would even be more symbolic - we don’t forget about the past and strive for a new one. And the ostentatious sign of the cross Shoigu with showing to the whole country is, in general, the complete stupidity of television directors. It turned out that Shoigu was baptized with his back to the icon, and not his face, as expected. And if he was baptized so that the parade was a success, then he had no confidence in success. So what? It’s also ridiculous, in my opinion, that sailors-cadets of the Naval Schools came with machine guns, even the latest ones, which they did not need at all. To fight them, if necessary, then on the ships. Always in parades, sailors marched with carbines on their shoulders, which looked very nice. Some kind of strange innovation ... But with the symbols, it’s somehow strange too, the Russian planes remained red-star, as in Soviet times, the rest changed their symbolism to the minds of the Armed Forces. Demonstration posters used to be red - now blue. Why exactly blue - who will explain ?. By principle - if only not red?
  17. fomkin
    fomkin 19 May 2015 05: 55
    0
    He looked his pros and cons. It turns out exactly half of the sympathetic hucksters. I did not expect to confess.