The European Union is going to solve the problem of illegal migration with the help of military force

26
EU authorities have decided to resort to decisive measures in the fight against illegal migration: Brussels asked the UN to give permission to use military force in the Mediterranean, writes "Expert".



The problem of illegal migrants was discussed during an extraordinary summit in late April, at the end of which German Chancellor Angela Merkel stated that it was decided to "put an end to the smuggling business."

The European Commissar for International Affairs and Security, Federica Mogherini, is in charge of developing plans for an international military operation to combat smugglers, headed by the European Union. She has already stated that Brussels will need a resolution that will allow the use of military force against the smuggling ships in the Mediterranean.

“The 30-page combat plan developed by Federica Mogherini’s ministry on the basis of the anti-piracy operation Atalanta in Somalia and adopted on May 5 in Brussels can find the main points of this struggle: to find, seize and destroy smugglers and assets of smugglers before they will take advantage. To implement the plan, you will need search satellites, special forces units, warships, ”notes "Expert".

However, the likelihood that Federica Mogherini will receive a mandate to use force in the Mediterranean is extremely small.

“The main difference between the European operation in the Mediterranean and Operation Atalanta is that in Somalia the military fought armed pirates. In the Mediterranean, however, will have to deal with vessels transporting hundreds of migrants. Meanwhile, international law prohibits warships from seizing and sinking such vessels, ”the article underlines.
  • http://gdb.rferl.org/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

26 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +15
    15 May 2015 11: 51
    So far, with the help of military force, they have only created a problem by killing Gaddafi, creating a hotbed of instability. I think if the EU Armed Forces appear in Libya, this will not lead to a decrease in the number of illegal migrants.
    1. +9
      15 May 2015 11: 58
      these woodpeckers do not seem to understand that destroying countries, they force their population to become migrants, the more they bomb, the more migrants there will be, it’s an axiom, it’s like two, two equals four, but these maramojoks or intentionally do not want to understand this or they really stupid, although they scratch everyone that they are not only smart, but also civilized.
      1. 0
        15 May 2015 12: 13
        Not in this case. There, half of Africa gets to Europe via a conveyor via sugar. According to the 2 of the year, people wander from one tent camp to another, moving forward with their turn. Somalia or Libya is a drop in the ocean.
        And the bill can easily be tied to the confiscation of ships in territorial waters if there are more than 20 persons on them without permission to stay in the EU. Or something like that, to protect them from fishermen and other hard workers legally.
      2. +1
        15 May 2015 13: 17
        Quote: just explo
        these woodpeckers do not seem to understand that destroying countries, they force their population to become migrants, the more they bomb, the more migrants will be,

        Why do not they understand? What the uncle said and allowed because of the puddle, they do it, but according to the uncle’s strategy this is how it should be, Europe chokes on emigrants, spends money on social programs and homeless people, squanders its economy, and the US economy looks like chocolate in the background .
    2. +6
      15 May 2015 11: 59
      Quote: volot-voin
      So far, with the help of military force, they have only created a problem by killing Gaddafi, creating a hotbed of instability.

      If they start drowning ships with migrants, it will fall into Europe itself. New residents will not like that their brothers are being killed at sea.
      1. +2
        15 May 2015 12: 17
        There will be a reason to carry out a massive sweeping of illegal immigrants, including with the help of military units, moreover with the overwhelming approval of indigenous, white Europeans. For after several days of pogroms, robberies and violence, more or less respectable citizens will demand tidying up tough measures. And after that, it is joyful to welcome the conduct of military operations in the nurseries of crime - Negro ghettos.
        1. +1
          15 May 2015 12: 23
          It seems that some of the European cones decided to equate migrants to smuggled goods, and carriers to smugglers. At a rapid pace, they are marching into the Paleolithic, when the word man was applicable only to a single cave.
          1. 0
            15 May 2015 12: 55
            Quote: Basarev
            At a rapid pace, they are marching into the Paleolithic, when the word man was applicable only to a single cave.

            why paleolithic. 200 years ago Moscow.
            http://ribalych.ru/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/15113.jpg

        2. 0
          15 May 2015 12: 50
          ... and welcome the new Fuhrer of the old woman of Europe!
          1. jjj
            0
            15 May 2015 13: 16
            And read the contracts of clubs for the purchase and sale of football players ...
      2. +4
        15 May 2015 12: 44
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Quote: volot-voin
        So far, with the help of military force, they have only created a problem by killing Gaddafi, creating a hotbed of instability.

        If they start drowning ships with migrants, it will fall into Europe itself. New residents will not like that their brothers are being killed at sea.


        and let it smell, it will open many eyes and untie the hands ... it would have already quickly kicked.
  2. BAT
    +7
    15 May 2015 11: 53
    The more problems they have, the easier it is for us to solve our problems.
  3. +3
    15 May 2015 11: 57
    The EU itself is to blame for the current situation. They were one of the first to support the wave of revolutions in northern Africa. In many ways, it is the EU leadership that incites conflicts in some African countries. And what remains to be done to ordinary people in their countries, where there is devastation and famine.
  4. +2
    15 May 2015 12: 00
    hypocrisy beyond good and evil am
  5. +5
    15 May 2015 12: 01
    Libya sends a big "thank you" to France and America.









    Ukraine apparently also guilty - people worked, enterprises produced products! Indos could not endure such horror ......
    1. 0
      15 May 2015 12: 26
      Most similar to the banal crisis of overproduction, who in the nineteenth century raged every ten years. All markets are oversaturated, so they conquer new ones and destroy competitors.
  6. +4
    15 May 2015 12: 01
    Here they are, "human rights" in action. Lies, falsity and pursuit of only their own mercantile goals - this is real Europe. The principle of strength is as old as the world. To hit Europe so that all the Jean, John, Hance and Peter teeth fly out. To plant such an animal fear there, which was not even before the USSR. That would be great. Ehhhh ...
  7. +1
    15 May 2015 12: 05
    Is it like, from Phalanx on a small ship from Africa?
  8. +1
    15 May 2015 12: 07
    Once again, Europe is raking out the "results" of its shortsightedness. Directly he constantly shows suicidal tendencies. We started with tolerance - the medical term is very negative.
    Naive fools are not even sorry.
    I hope very much that again, as has been repeatedly done in History, we will not save them. Time has shown that the road to hell is lined with good intentions.
  9. +3
    15 May 2015 12: 08
    In fact, combating this type of illegal migration is not at all difficult. If you just intercept and drown in the sea these cots full of blacks. No one, respectively, not saving. They found, gave a dozen salvos or one torpedo, made sure that the ship was sinking, they left. But everyone understands that this scenario for today's tolerant Europe is simply terribly unacceptable. Although after the tenth of the sunken ship, bringing this information to the black coast, this route of arrival of illegal immigrants will close.
  10. HAM
    +3
    15 May 2015 12: 10
    Meanwhile, international law prohibits warships from hijacking and sinking such ships. ”


    At least someone will remember a case when the law was respected (AND NOT ONLY THIS RIGHT) by "civilized" countries! ??
    "LAW" for them, what a tongue ...
    1. 0
      15 May 2015 12: 34
      And therefore, we should also disown international law and act only as beneficial to us. And do not be shy of your strength, applying it in the most romantic corners of the planet.
  11. +1
    15 May 2015 12: 13
    or it may be easier to organize the euro collective farmers on transatlantic voyages and send everyone straight to the "light elves". And what about in Canada and the country of "light elves" is full of empty land taken at least the same Detroit laughing
  12. +1
    15 May 2015 12: 16
    It’s just that in the EU there is a favorite rake that he keeps in a specially protected cabinet. From time to time, he gets them, and with a masochistic-tolerant expression on his face, he steps on them. We look forward to further developments ...
  13. -1
    15 May 2015 12: 20
    international law prohibits warships from hijacking and drowning such ships (with refugees), but they don’t need to be drowned, they must be deployed directly to the sea back to their homeland and that’s all.
    1. +2
      15 May 2015 12: 36
      Quote: poplar 7
      international law prohibits warships from hijacking and sinking such ships (with refugees), and they don’t need to be drowned, they need to be deployed directly to the sea back to their homeland.

      And if they do not agree to return, then what, and then you yourself are not funny when you mention the West's observance of international law? What is this concept of "international law" in general, which has different interpretations depending on the parties to which it is applied, and is nothing more than a cover for the colonialist, aggressive interests of the Anglo-Saxons.
  14. +1
    15 May 2015 12: 36
    This is why the Fuhrer decided to drown civilians fleeing the war?
    Yes, geyropeysky values ​​are available. In general, it is customary to help the needy, but for leaky people everything is exactly the opposite.
  15. 0
    15 May 2015 12: 53
    EU peacekeepers - they will pacify all, without exception.
  16. 0
    15 May 2015 12: 59
    This is how problems are solved in Europe, but what about the notorious "tolerance"
  17. 0
    15 May 2015 13: 06
    Quote: bmv04636
    or it may be easier to organize the euro collective farmers on transatlantic voyages and send everyone straight to the "light elves". And what about in Canada and the country of "light elves" is full of empty land taken at least the same Detroit laughing

    Detroit already moved to Canada? was like in the USA?
  18. 0
    15 May 2015 13: 44
    Someone doesn’t like the guys in the photo ... They decided to arm them. And then what, until they came up with ... Well, well ...
  19. 0
    15 May 2015 13: 46
    These are the future soldiers of the European army.
    1. 0
      15 May 2015 16: 55
      rather fathers, husbands
  20. 0
    15 May 2015 14: 41
    Brussels appealed to the UN with a request for permission to use military force in the Mediterranean Sea, Expert writes.

    And who is stopping them from establishing normal control over sea borders? As soon as "various other" Swedes and small-breds "discover" a supposedly Russian submarine near their shores, the forces and means to search for it immediately appear, the sea border is sealed with a lock (the fish will not slip through). And here whole fleets of migrants are sailing without deviating from the intended path.
  21. 0
    15 May 2015 16: 54
    Do not heat the fuel.
  22. 0
    15 May 2015 21: 28
    At first, Europe will cherish everything, then it will be surprised, but the smell comes from.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"