The problems that our liberal government cannot solve become the problems of the people
“What the government is doing is destroying Russia faster than sanctions.” I understand that people today are ready to suffer every kind of hardship in order for Russia to defend its principles during such an external threat. But this cannot go on forever. The president needs to pay attention to these problems, otherwise he will soon lose people's respect, which now rests only on hatred of an external enemy. ”
Russian satirist writer Mikhail Zadornov.
Correspondent of our information and publishing newsletter (IIW "OM-SEARCH) Alexander Budyachevsky met with famous Russian political scientist, Ph.D., Honored Lawyer of the Russian Federation By Alin Belkovsky Jr. and asked him to answer a number of topical issues.
TO.: Alin Yakovlevich, please describe the reason for the decline of our industry and the transformation of our once powerful industrial country into a raw materials appendage of the West and China.
AB-m: Let's, like Kiselev, let us mumble and frankly say that the liberals broke our industry, science and education and turned the country with a commodity liberal economy into a raw material appendage of the industrially developed West ... And neither the president nor Prime Minister liberal Medvedev even stutters the need for a transition to an industrial-mobilization economy to boost our industry ... For now, this will not be done, Russia will not be able to go to industrialized countries and will, as now, depend on the industrial West, no matter what vorili nor promised the current leaders of the country!
TO.: How and why did this happen? After all, pro-Western liberals are not the majority of Russia ...
AB-m: The Russian government, which voluntarily gave all the economic federal and regional economic levers into the hands of the liberal Gaidar-Yasinsky bloc, has still not parted with the liberal economy, which destroyed the powerful Soviet industry and predetermined the colonial way for the raw material storehouse of the West ... "from the high incomes from the supply of natural resources to the West, primarily oil and gas, more than two decades have been lost to finance and revitalize the industry with money for the expo Resource resources ... And as a result, we got what we got - a raw materials economy serving the industrial West ... Now the Russian economy is not an industrial boom in the production of industrial goods, for industrial enterprises have either been destroyed, or redeveloped or converted into shopping and entertainment complexes, and the trade-speculative boom: beats life with the key from effective managers-speculators, in proliferated banking structures, in trading corporations with numerous sellers and buyers of all kinds of real estate, There are money stocks, securities and other "intellectual" resources ... It seems that everyone is doing everything, everyone is doing something, but there are no Russian goods, practically everything is imported, from where it is not imported ... Look at the electronics on our shelves, Refrigerators, TVs and other technologically complex products - almost all imported, mostly from China ... Even screws and other hardware from China or Thailand - our manufacturers do not want to do, because it is not profitable for them ... And so almost everywhere ! And why is it unprofitable to do your own? Yes, because we live with a liberal government, with a liberal economy, we play by the rules of the WTO and the IMF, we depend on the decisions of the American Fed - that is, we meet the characteristics of the raw materials appendage of the West ...
Even the "right" officials get around these issues, but we are mumbled, because we are not expelled from "nourishing bureaucratic bureaucrats", and therefore let us be frank that import substitution in our country has a chance of success only with the mobilization model of the industrial economy. ..
With the liberals who build our economy along Western patterns, you cannot build such an economy ...
But Stalin was able to build a mobilization economy and create a powerful industry, which allowed the USSR to kill the backbone of German fascism, which relies on the powerful economy of all Europe in the war with the Russian people.
TO.: Why the government does not go to the model of mobilization economy, if the liberal fails and hinders the development of the potential of the country under the pressure of Western economic sanctions?
AB-m: You are right about the slowdown of our economy. But the liberals have reasons to hush up this inhibition. They lie on the surface: a liberal economy in a country rich in natural resources means that the economy will remain raw. It is clear to everyone, not just economists, that it is much more profitable to buy Chinese consumer goods and sell them in hypermarkets built on the site of factories with the proceeds than to build and restore oil, gas and other raw materials and sell it abroad. plants. The profitability of trade in consumer goods and capital turnover is much higher. No plants will bring such a quick profit as from the export of raw materials and imports of consumer goods. And while there are people in power who do not want to carry out re-industrialization, do not want to transfer the economy to a mobilization regime, until then Russia will have a raw-materials economy and a very high dependence on imported goods ...
Russian patriots are calling on the government headed by the prime minister-liberal, but unsuccessfully, to change the course towards the continuation of the liberal economy that has made our country a raw materials appendage of the West to an industrial-mobilization model of the economy, as Stalin did, which allowed him to build a powerful industry, science and education, to defeat Hitler’s fascism, to create an atomic weapon and much more than we still use today ... And now we have an industry destroyed by the liberal Gaidar-Yasi economic bloc, but a liberal economy, and as a raw country, we pray to God for high prices for oil and gas ... And Now we recall that the economic bloc in the Russian government and the leadership of the Central Bank, the true owners are not in Moscow.
Recall that in the liberal government and the Russian liberal economy completely liberals.
First, Medvedev is a liberal, and the economic bloc of the government has been headed for more than two decades by the Gaidar-Jasin encirclement, which has created a liberal economy in the country according to Western patterns, guaranteed to turn Russia into a raw materials appendage of the West with fattening industry ... Most Russians openly declare that they expect Putin to abandon his liberal economic friends (Medvedev, Kudrin, Gref, Nabiullina ...) and the liberal economy and a decisive transition to industrial-mobilization nnoj economy, as did Stalin, who created a powerful industry.
Secondly, it goes without saying that many Russians do not like the fact that liberals have been in charge of everything in Russia, that for more than two decades we have a liberal economy that has made us a raw materials appendage of the industrial West. Russians do not like that their life is determined by the constitution written by the Americans after the collapse of the USSR for the country - the future colony of the West ... Recently Medvedev said that “we will remain true to the market economy and will never accept the Stalinist version of the economy”, under which practically a powerful industry from scratch that allowed us to defeat the Hitlerite military machine for which the entire European industry worked ... Why should we, along with Medvedev, unsuccessfully look for ways to improve our industry within e two decades of our current liberal economy, tailored to Western patterns by Egorushka Gaidar, Chubais, comrades?
Thirdly, what are we going to do with the economic bloc of the government, consisting entirely of liberals, stupidly following more than two decades on the broken track of the “liberal economy”, which has destroyed the former power of Soviet industry and retards the development of the present? Perhaps, to endure, because “God endured, and told us,” and Vladimir Vladimirovich is silent ... A dangerous position - you can wait for misfortunes, because the West has always been, is and will be opposed to a strong and independent Russia ... Wars, especially nuclear, death to yourself Of course, none of the patriots want relatives and citizens of Russia! But they also do not want to fool around like Svidomo from the outskirts, and Russians, too, do not want and will not cherish the invitations of the US and EU to our masters!
TO.: Alin Yakovlevich, judging by your publications in the press, you are extremely negative about the liberals and not only in the Russian government, but in general ... Explain your position.
AB-m: “Russian patriots are sounding the alarm that economic liberalism is leading our country into the abyss, but the liberals do not want to hear their people ... Dostoevsky was right, calling the liberals demons, hating Russians, Russian World and Russia ...
And Dostoevsky’s conclusion was confirmed by another Russian liberal, Mikhail Kasyanov. Former Russian Prime Minister Misha-two percent, who took business on 2% for his signature on every financial document, didn’t cause anything to Russians except hatred and disgust ... And his next betrayal of the Motherland only strengthened him the contempt of the patriotic Russians ... And whatever they say about the consolidation of different sectors of Russian society Medvedev and Co. or the president, the majority of Russians believe that there should be no such income gap in Russia! The greed of the nouveau riche does not allow either the Duma, or the government, or the president to introduce even such a small amount as a progressive payroll tax instead of 13% tax for everyone - for the rich and for the poor! What kind of patriotism can the authorities ask in a society divided into exploiters and deprived, and who will defend the capital of money-bags in arms in the event of a military situation in the country?
No matter how sad and annoying it is, but our prime minister directly and publicly voiced his credo: “The statements that we have to change everything, adjust everything, live according to a different model, they are wrong.” The conclusion from his words is clear: nothing will change in the economy. The prerequisites for the further collapse and stagnation of the industry remain, and there will not be any departure from the discredited liberal tenets and the raw materials economy, that is, there will be no renewal: “All our priorities, our strategic installations must remain the same, and they will remain so”, “even Crisis conditions should not change our intentions. ” In other words, the government and its economic bloc, even under conditions of drastic sanctions by the United States and Europe, will not take any measures to save the country, despite the changing conditions, and Russians are encouraged to prepare for "a different economic reality that will test all of us for strength." Purely liberal, you suffer a little, guys ... Tighten your belts, but we will not do anything to improve the economy ... It will resolve itself, the market will put everything in its place ... Again rotten, cheap demagogy.
And a few words about Russian, yes, yes, Russian, not Russian identity ... When we hear the word "Russian", the soul is filled with pride for involvement in the "Russian world" ... In the West, in the same America, no one calls us Russians, only Russians ... Please note that the organization "Russian Youth of America" operates in New York ... Yes, yes Russian, not Russian ... And our liberals are contemptuous, like demons in Dostoevsky , frown on the words "Russian", "Russian world", "the Orthodox world of the Slavic brotherhood" ... Removed from the passport the column "National spine "and made all the rootless cosmopolitans-Russians ... Why Germans are proud to say that he was a German, a Pole, calls himself a Pole, a Frenchman - a Frenchman ... And why do we, Russian, Russians should be called?
Remember that Alexander Suvorov said: "We, Russians! God is with us, we will win!"
And Georgian Stalin, in his toast for the victory over fascist Germany, recognized the Russians as the state-forming people, who cemented all peoples of the USSR to defeat fascism.
TO.: Do you think that Western sanctions, worsening the economic situation of ordinary Russians, can affect their compliance with the requirements of the West, and through them - compliance with the West with our highest authority, including the president?
AB-m: Many Russian patriots are not afraid of the negative anti-Russian sanctions of the West, and they do not want a quick lifting of these sanctions ... Why? Because only under Western sanctions, our higher authorities began to talk about import substitution, collapsed Russian industry, problems in science and education, and began to “look askance at the liberals”, who introduced a market-oriented, liberal economy in Russia and spread out all federal and regional power corridors structures of "effective" managers and managers who systematically destroy our industry, science and education ... And there is a hope that from the "sidelong glance" of our power "on the actions" of the liberals and their henchmen- objective managers "in industry, science and education before applying the" broom principle "to them - one step ... Everything goes to this, and sooner or later this will happen: the liberals in Russia will be swept to the back storiesand the managers, with their “ability to transfer everything to money” will be put on the back burner and will go to assistants to the managers-professionals in a specific field of knowledge ... And managers who did not fit into the future changes in Russia will be rejected by the system unnecessary tool.
TO.: Why is the topic of the replacement of liberals in the economic bloc of our Government not put forward in the media among the top priorities? And does the passing from time to time replacement of some liberals for other liberals is able to deploy our government for not verbal, but effective modernization and development of our industry?
AB-m: “That's right, such a replacement is useless for the cause ... Not only the authorities, but also political scientists carefully go around the topic of discussion and assessment of the president’s environment, drafting his future decisions ... And this environment is mostly pro-Western, these are liberals: Medvedev, Dvorkovich, Ulyukaev, Gref, Siluanov and others, included in the "powers that be" ...
As before, those who destroyed our economy in the 90 and subsequent years, especially the so-called young reformers, remain invulnerable. Having repeatedly said that there is a significant stratum of foreign agents of influence in the Russian elite, our president has not done anything to eradicate it - the liberal lobby dominates the economic and social bloc of the government, torpedoing any attempts to recreate our country's high-tech potential ... which would contain a clear understanding of social justice and demonstrate that our state is built on the basis of justice. But it was precisely the loss of this idea that became one of the main ideological reasons for the fall of the USSR. Frank injustice in the relations of the Russian elite and the people does not contribute to the emergence of spiritual uplift, self-sacrifice, without which it is impossible to make a technological breakthrough within a reasonable time. And this leads to an increase in social tension, intensifies negative phenomena in the economy ...
Strategic uncertainty in Russia itself brings confusion in the minds of Russians.
Vladimir Putin calls for the structuring of the economy, and the liberal German Gref clarifies the need to structure management. But none of them calls for the abandonment of a raw, liberal economy and the transition to an industrial-mobilization model of the economy.
What does the Western protege liberal Kudrin want? Judging by his latest statements, the preservation of the raw materials and liberal economy in Russia ..
Siluanov, Ulyukaev, Nabiullina, Gref and the Prime Minister himself are liberal economists who can only add and minus money in articles of the curtailed budget, but are not taught how to develop domestic production and productive forces, that is, what even the mediocre Soviet leader knew and knew economist.
And it’s worthless to admire the fact that Nabiullina and Ulyukaev were trained in the USA - graduates of the IVLP (International Visitor Leadership Program - International Guest Leadership Program) program organized by the US State Department, as the main goal of this program is to educate participants about American values and views on life, which adhere to US citizens.
And from this it is clear that as before, in our country, like-minded people, pro-Western liberals, who still hold all more or less important command posts in federal and regional authorities, will "rule the ball" ... And everyone understands that it is very important for them to preserve the Russian economy as a raw material, liberal, fertile for "effective managers" - specialists in corruption and cutting state budget funds ... And there is not any support for the transition of Russia to the course of the industrial-mobilization economy, in which alos upgrade "frozen in the paddock," Russian industry.
Soul and thoughts of the elite surrounding Vladimir Putin, with the West ... And therefore she deeply cares about the position of the Russian worker, whether it is a working man or a "white collar" ... Let us recall how a few years ago Brzezinski, communicating with our scientists on the issue of missile defense , he said that he does not see a single case in which Russia could resort to its nuclear potential, while in American banks lies 500 billion dollars belonging to the Russian elite. And then he added: you still have to figure out whose elite it is, yours or already ours. This elite does not bind their fate with the fate of Russia. Their money is already there, the children are already there ... ”For some reason, in this connection, words from the Gospel are recalled:“ For where your treasure is, there will be your heart ”...
TO.: Alin Yakovlevich, state your position on the relationship of the destruction of domestic industry by liberals with the collapse of Soviet education and science inherited by us ...
AB-m: Russians are not enthusiastic about liberals destroying Soviet education and science, whose main goal was to educate a man-creator and a patriot ... Instead, education (since the times of ex-ministers Filippov, Fursenko and current minister Livanov) is rebuilt according to Western recipes with preparation " creative consumers "and the slogan" nothing personal, gentlemen, only business ... "
Industry, education, science and culture have been handed over to "effective" managers ... The result is deplorable: everything is falling apart, and soon we will write out engineers, doctors and teachers from abroad!
Conclusion: until Russia replaces a raw material, liberal economy that has made our country a raw materials appendage of the industrial West, to an industrial-mobilization economy, no breakthroughs and major achievements in industry, science and education can be expected! The terrible thing is that the scientific and technical reserve of the Soviet era is ending, and there is no one to replenish it.
In Russian education now everything is like in the West: what does not fit the needs of the market is excluded.
Why? Because the global market in Russia, in the West, does not need a moral, educated person who knows the history of his Fatherland well. Therefore, the separation of education from education takes place.
By the way, the ex-minister extruded from the post of education Fursenko is now the assistant of our president. The former former head of the Ministry of Education and Science Filippov, who joined Russia to the Bologna process and introduced the USE, is now the chairman of the Higher Attestation Commission of Russia ... The current Minister Livanov successfully continues the "work" of his predecessors ...
TO.: At the end of the interview, I ask you to express an opinion on your vision of the necessary, top-priority tasks of our highest authority for the development of the country's economy to bring it to the leaders of the industrial world.
AB-m: If Vladimir Putin does not replace the liberal economy with a mobilization for the restoration of industry, then in the course of time the West will economically “wring” Russia. It's funny, but this was what the Assistant to the President Sergey Glazyev used to say about Ukraine, and now this idea can be fully attached to the evaluation of the economic policies of our liberal government and the liberal central bank acting on Western, liberal patterns.
Sergey Glazyev in Russia is neither heard by the authorities, nor by Vladimir Putin personally, but the president offers a showcasing, cheap economy in the country by reducing the salaries of officials by 10% (six months ago, their salary was raised by almost 30%, this is for information) instead of the transition expected by the Russians from a liberal market economy to a mobilization to restore the industry destroyed by the liberals. Industry will be restored, and no one will need a window-dressing with a reduction in the salary of officials!
Otherwise, the West will sweep away an economically weak Russia with all the salaries of the liberals who have been entrenched in power, turning Russia into a raw materials appendage of the industrially developed West ... Many also understand that it is not necessary to think about filling the American pod (Reserve Fund), but about restoring industry. depend on the price of oil!
The majority of Russians are against the liberal economy that has finished industrial, science and education of Russia and leading the country to a complete dependence on a stronger, market economy of the West ... And therefore it stands for a mobilization economy that provides for financed influences in and development of Russian production, instead of expanding oil and gas gas production and other raw materials for export to the West.
And the majority of Russians are not at all against statism. But the trouble is that this ideology is aimed at the development of the commodity sector in Russia, and not industrial production, as required by the Russians!
Now, if etatism changed the vector of application (from the increase in the extraction of raw materials to the commissioning of new industrial productions, and even we began to import nails and screws from China), then we would understand our president, whom the Gaidar-Yasinsky liberal lobby takes care of, filling in ours government and leading the liberal economy for more than two decades.
It was 1991 that year, when liberal forces seized power in the country, led to a catastrophe in the field of demography. In the 1990-ies, the people were subjected to a real attack, socio-economic, drug, alcohol and tobacco genocide. Liberals act as real occupiers, seize (privatize) those productions that can bring profits to their accomplices - oligarchs, destroy those systems that cannot bring them quick profits, “optimize” science, education, culture.
This is exactly how Russia needs to hurry in replacing its liberal economy, serving the industrial West with industrial raw materials, with a mobilization-industrial one in order to revive its industry that has become thin and ruined by liberals.
Let us recall the prophetic words of Professor MGATO Kasatonov: "... The mobilization economy helps any country that wages a war or is preparing for it to win or at least not lose. Russia is a special country in this regard, during the 20th century there were" hot "or "Cold" wars. Russia as a state, as a civilization can exist only in the conditions of a mobilization economy. This, as they say, is a "medical fact." All attempts to transfer the economy to market relations are simply attempts to destroy our state ... "
The mobilization economy is characterized by: “First of all, a high rate of accumulation, that is, the volume of investments in increasing fixed capital (real production). Countries that at various times demonstrated an economic miracle, like Germany or Japan after the war, increased the rate of accumulation. It reached them 30-35% and sometimes 40% of GDP. In the USSR, after World War II, the accumulation rate was at the level of 25%, and during industrialization, according to experts, 50-60% ... "
If we do not do this, then the raw materials economy of Russia will lose the battle to the industrial economy of the West! Putin can no longer sit on liberal and patriotic chairs at the same time. Otherwise, it will fall along with the economy.
The main liberal Egorushka Gaidar promised in the 90s that only the liberal economy would make the Russians richer and happier ... Chubais, Gref, Kudrin, Koch sang along with Yegorushka later, they deceived, the economy was in a stop, the industry was in ruins ... curse all liberals and their appointees in the face of effective managers and leaders ... But there would be no turning to national history, besides the film "Chapaev": "Whites will come - rob, red will come - rob, where will the poor peasant go?"
The question has remained open until the present time - the adoption of a mobilization economy is in line, in a Stalinist way and without liberals!
TO.: Dear Alin Yakovlevich, thank you very much for the interview, I wish you success in your creative work!
AB-m: Thank you, and your messenger - all the best and success!
Russian satirist writer Mikhail Zadornov.
Correspondent of our information and publishing newsletter (IIW "OM-SEARCH) Alexander Budyachevsky met with famous Russian political scientist, Ph.D., Honored Lawyer of the Russian Federation By Alin Belkovsky Jr. and asked him to answer a number of topical issues.
TO.: Alin Yakovlevich, please describe the reason for the decline of our industry and the transformation of our once powerful industrial country into a raw materials appendage of the West and China.
AB-m: Let's, like Kiselev, let us mumble and frankly say that the liberals broke our industry, science and education and turned the country with a commodity liberal economy into a raw material appendage of the industrially developed West ... And neither the president nor Prime Minister liberal Medvedev even stutters the need for a transition to an industrial-mobilization economy to boost our industry ... For now, this will not be done, Russia will not be able to go to industrialized countries and will, as now, depend on the industrial West, no matter what vorili nor promised the current leaders of the country!
TO.: How and why did this happen? After all, pro-Western liberals are not the majority of Russia ...
AB-m: The Russian government, which voluntarily gave all the economic federal and regional economic levers into the hands of the liberal Gaidar-Yasinsky bloc, has still not parted with the liberal economy, which destroyed the powerful Soviet industry and predetermined the colonial way for the raw material storehouse of the West ... "from the high incomes from the supply of natural resources to the West, primarily oil and gas, more than two decades have been lost to finance and revitalize the industry with money for the expo Resource resources ... And as a result, we got what we got - a raw materials economy serving the industrial West ... Now the Russian economy is not an industrial boom in the production of industrial goods, for industrial enterprises have either been destroyed, or redeveloped or converted into shopping and entertainment complexes, and the trade-speculative boom: beats life with the key from effective managers-speculators, in proliferated banking structures, in trading corporations with numerous sellers and buyers of all kinds of real estate, There are money stocks, securities and other "intellectual" resources ... It seems that everyone is doing everything, everyone is doing something, but there are no Russian goods, practically everything is imported, from where it is not imported ... Look at the electronics on our shelves, Refrigerators, TVs and other technologically complex products - almost all imported, mostly from China ... Even screws and other hardware from China or Thailand - our manufacturers do not want to do, because it is not profitable for them ... And so almost everywhere ! And why is it unprofitable to do your own? Yes, because we live with a liberal government, with a liberal economy, we play by the rules of the WTO and the IMF, we depend on the decisions of the American Fed - that is, we meet the characteristics of the raw materials appendage of the West ...
Even the "right" officials get around these issues, but we are mumbled, because we are not expelled from "nourishing bureaucratic bureaucrats", and therefore let us be frank that import substitution in our country has a chance of success only with the mobilization model of the industrial economy. ..
With the liberals who build our economy along Western patterns, you cannot build such an economy ...
But Stalin was able to build a mobilization economy and create a powerful industry, which allowed the USSR to kill the backbone of German fascism, which relies on the powerful economy of all Europe in the war with the Russian people.
TO.: Why the government does not go to the model of mobilization economy, if the liberal fails and hinders the development of the potential of the country under the pressure of Western economic sanctions?
AB-m: You are right about the slowdown of our economy. But the liberals have reasons to hush up this inhibition. They lie on the surface: a liberal economy in a country rich in natural resources means that the economy will remain raw. It is clear to everyone, not just economists, that it is much more profitable to buy Chinese consumer goods and sell them in hypermarkets built on the site of factories with the proceeds than to build and restore oil, gas and other raw materials and sell it abroad. plants. The profitability of trade in consumer goods and capital turnover is much higher. No plants will bring such a quick profit as from the export of raw materials and imports of consumer goods. And while there are people in power who do not want to carry out re-industrialization, do not want to transfer the economy to a mobilization regime, until then Russia will have a raw-materials economy and a very high dependence on imported goods ...
Russian patriots are calling on the government headed by the prime minister-liberal, but unsuccessfully, to change the course towards the continuation of the liberal economy that has made our country a raw materials appendage of the West to an industrial-mobilization model of the economy, as Stalin did, which allowed him to build a powerful industry, science and education, to defeat Hitler’s fascism, to create an atomic weapon and much more than we still use today ... And now we have an industry destroyed by the liberal Gaidar-Yasi economic bloc, but a liberal economy, and as a raw country, we pray to God for high prices for oil and gas ... And Now we recall that the economic bloc in the Russian government and the leadership of the Central Bank, the true owners are not in Moscow.
Recall that in the liberal government and the Russian liberal economy completely liberals.
First, Medvedev is a liberal, and the economic bloc of the government has been headed for more than two decades by the Gaidar-Jasin encirclement, which has created a liberal economy in the country according to Western patterns, guaranteed to turn Russia into a raw materials appendage of the West with fattening industry ... Most Russians openly declare that they expect Putin to abandon his liberal economic friends (Medvedev, Kudrin, Gref, Nabiullina ...) and the liberal economy and a decisive transition to industrial-mobilization nnoj economy, as did Stalin, who created a powerful industry.
Secondly, it goes without saying that many Russians do not like the fact that liberals have been in charge of everything in Russia, that for more than two decades we have a liberal economy that has made us a raw materials appendage of the industrial West. Russians do not like that their life is determined by the constitution written by the Americans after the collapse of the USSR for the country - the future colony of the West ... Recently Medvedev said that “we will remain true to the market economy and will never accept the Stalinist version of the economy”, under which practically a powerful industry from scratch that allowed us to defeat the Hitlerite military machine for which the entire European industry worked ... Why should we, along with Medvedev, unsuccessfully look for ways to improve our industry within e two decades of our current liberal economy, tailored to Western patterns by Egorushka Gaidar, Chubais, comrades?
Thirdly, what are we going to do with the economic bloc of the government, consisting entirely of liberals, stupidly following more than two decades on the broken track of the “liberal economy”, which has destroyed the former power of Soviet industry and retards the development of the present? Perhaps, to endure, because “God endured, and told us,” and Vladimir Vladimirovich is silent ... A dangerous position - you can wait for misfortunes, because the West has always been, is and will be opposed to a strong and independent Russia ... Wars, especially nuclear, death to yourself Of course, none of the patriots want relatives and citizens of Russia! But they also do not want to fool around like Svidomo from the outskirts, and Russians, too, do not want and will not cherish the invitations of the US and EU to our masters!
TO.: Alin Yakovlevich, judging by your publications in the press, you are extremely negative about the liberals and not only in the Russian government, but in general ... Explain your position.
AB-m: “Russian patriots are sounding the alarm that economic liberalism is leading our country into the abyss, but the liberals do not want to hear their people ... Dostoevsky was right, calling the liberals demons, hating Russians, Russian World and Russia ...
And Dostoevsky’s conclusion was confirmed by another Russian liberal, Mikhail Kasyanov. Former Russian Prime Minister Misha-two percent, who took business on 2% for his signature on every financial document, didn’t cause anything to Russians except hatred and disgust ... And his next betrayal of the Motherland only strengthened him the contempt of the patriotic Russians ... And whatever they say about the consolidation of different sectors of Russian society Medvedev and Co. or the president, the majority of Russians believe that there should be no such income gap in Russia! The greed of the nouveau riche does not allow either the Duma, or the government, or the president to introduce even such a small amount as a progressive payroll tax instead of 13% tax for everyone - for the rich and for the poor! What kind of patriotism can the authorities ask in a society divided into exploiters and deprived, and who will defend the capital of money-bags in arms in the event of a military situation in the country?
No matter how sad and annoying it is, but our prime minister directly and publicly voiced his credo: “The statements that we have to change everything, adjust everything, live according to a different model, they are wrong.” The conclusion from his words is clear: nothing will change in the economy. The prerequisites for the further collapse and stagnation of the industry remain, and there will not be any departure from the discredited liberal tenets and the raw materials economy, that is, there will be no renewal: “All our priorities, our strategic installations must remain the same, and they will remain so”, “even Crisis conditions should not change our intentions. ” In other words, the government and its economic bloc, even under conditions of drastic sanctions by the United States and Europe, will not take any measures to save the country, despite the changing conditions, and Russians are encouraged to prepare for "a different economic reality that will test all of us for strength." Purely liberal, you suffer a little, guys ... Tighten your belts, but we will not do anything to improve the economy ... It will resolve itself, the market will put everything in its place ... Again rotten, cheap demagogy.
And a few words about Russian, yes, yes, Russian, not Russian identity ... When we hear the word "Russian", the soul is filled with pride for involvement in the "Russian world" ... In the West, in the same America, no one calls us Russians, only Russians ... Please note that the organization "Russian Youth of America" operates in New York ... Yes, yes Russian, not Russian ... And our liberals are contemptuous, like demons in Dostoevsky , frown on the words "Russian", "Russian world", "the Orthodox world of the Slavic brotherhood" ... Removed from the passport the column "National spine "and made all the rootless cosmopolitans-Russians ... Why Germans are proud to say that he was a German, a Pole, calls himself a Pole, a Frenchman - a Frenchman ... And why do we, Russian, Russians should be called?
Remember that Alexander Suvorov said: "We, Russians! God is with us, we will win!"
And Georgian Stalin, in his toast for the victory over fascist Germany, recognized the Russians as the state-forming people, who cemented all peoples of the USSR to defeat fascism.
TO.: Do you think that Western sanctions, worsening the economic situation of ordinary Russians, can affect their compliance with the requirements of the West, and through them - compliance with the West with our highest authority, including the president?
AB-m: Many Russian patriots are not afraid of the negative anti-Russian sanctions of the West, and they do not want a quick lifting of these sanctions ... Why? Because only under Western sanctions, our higher authorities began to talk about import substitution, collapsed Russian industry, problems in science and education, and began to “look askance at the liberals”, who introduced a market-oriented, liberal economy in Russia and spread out all federal and regional power corridors structures of "effective" managers and managers who systematically destroy our industry, science and education ... And there is a hope that from the "sidelong glance" of our power "on the actions" of the liberals and their henchmen- objective managers "in industry, science and education before applying the" broom principle "to them - one step ... Everything goes to this, and sooner or later this will happen: the liberals in Russia will be swept to the back storiesand the managers, with their “ability to transfer everything to money” will be put on the back burner and will go to assistants to the managers-professionals in a specific field of knowledge ... And managers who did not fit into the future changes in Russia will be rejected by the system unnecessary tool.
TO.: Why is the topic of the replacement of liberals in the economic bloc of our Government not put forward in the media among the top priorities? And does the passing from time to time replacement of some liberals for other liberals is able to deploy our government for not verbal, but effective modernization and development of our industry?
AB-m: “That's right, such a replacement is useless for the cause ... Not only the authorities, but also political scientists carefully go around the topic of discussion and assessment of the president’s environment, drafting his future decisions ... And this environment is mostly pro-Western, these are liberals: Medvedev, Dvorkovich, Ulyukaev, Gref, Siluanov and others, included in the "powers that be" ...
As before, those who destroyed our economy in the 90 and subsequent years, especially the so-called young reformers, remain invulnerable. Having repeatedly said that there is a significant stratum of foreign agents of influence in the Russian elite, our president has not done anything to eradicate it - the liberal lobby dominates the economic and social bloc of the government, torpedoing any attempts to recreate our country's high-tech potential ... which would contain a clear understanding of social justice and demonstrate that our state is built on the basis of justice. But it was precisely the loss of this idea that became one of the main ideological reasons for the fall of the USSR. Frank injustice in the relations of the Russian elite and the people does not contribute to the emergence of spiritual uplift, self-sacrifice, without which it is impossible to make a technological breakthrough within a reasonable time. And this leads to an increase in social tension, intensifies negative phenomena in the economy ...
Strategic uncertainty in Russia itself brings confusion in the minds of Russians.
Vladimir Putin calls for the structuring of the economy, and the liberal German Gref clarifies the need to structure management. But none of them calls for the abandonment of a raw, liberal economy and the transition to an industrial-mobilization model of the economy.
What does the Western protege liberal Kudrin want? Judging by his latest statements, the preservation of the raw materials and liberal economy in Russia ..
Siluanov, Ulyukaev, Nabiullina, Gref and the Prime Minister himself are liberal economists who can only add and minus money in articles of the curtailed budget, but are not taught how to develop domestic production and productive forces, that is, what even the mediocre Soviet leader knew and knew economist.
And it’s worthless to admire the fact that Nabiullina and Ulyukaev were trained in the USA - graduates of the IVLP (International Visitor Leadership Program - International Guest Leadership Program) program organized by the US State Department, as the main goal of this program is to educate participants about American values and views on life, which adhere to US citizens.
And from this it is clear that as before, in our country, like-minded people, pro-Western liberals, who still hold all more or less important command posts in federal and regional authorities, will "rule the ball" ... And everyone understands that it is very important for them to preserve the Russian economy as a raw material, liberal, fertile for "effective managers" - specialists in corruption and cutting state budget funds ... And there is not any support for the transition of Russia to the course of the industrial-mobilization economy, in which alos upgrade "frozen in the paddock," Russian industry.
Soul and thoughts of the elite surrounding Vladimir Putin, with the West ... And therefore she deeply cares about the position of the Russian worker, whether it is a working man or a "white collar" ... Let us recall how a few years ago Brzezinski, communicating with our scientists on the issue of missile defense , he said that he does not see a single case in which Russia could resort to its nuclear potential, while in American banks lies 500 billion dollars belonging to the Russian elite. And then he added: you still have to figure out whose elite it is, yours or already ours. This elite does not bind their fate with the fate of Russia. Their money is already there, the children are already there ... ”For some reason, in this connection, words from the Gospel are recalled:“ For where your treasure is, there will be your heart ”...
TO.: Alin Yakovlevich, state your position on the relationship of the destruction of domestic industry by liberals with the collapse of Soviet education and science inherited by us ...
AB-m: Russians are not enthusiastic about liberals destroying Soviet education and science, whose main goal was to educate a man-creator and a patriot ... Instead, education (since the times of ex-ministers Filippov, Fursenko and current minister Livanov) is rebuilt according to Western recipes with preparation " creative consumers "and the slogan" nothing personal, gentlemen, only business ... "
Industry, education, science and culture have been handed over to "effective" managers ... The result is deplorable: everything is falling apart, and soon we will write out engineers, doctors and teachers from abroad!
Conclusion: until Russia replaces a raw material, liberal economy that has made our country a raw materials appendage of the industrial West, to an industrial-mobilization economy, no breakthroughs and major achievements in industry, science and education can be expected! The terrible thing is that the scientific and technical reserve of the Soviet era is ending, and there is no one to replenish it.
In Russian education now everything is like in the West: what does not fit the needs of the market is excluded.
Why? Because the global market in Russia, in the West, does not need a moral, educated person who knows the history of his Fatherland well. Therefore, the separation of education from education takes place.
By the way, the ex-minister extruded from the post of education Fursenko is now the assistant of our president. The former former head of the Ministry of Education and Science Filippov, who joined Russia to the Bologna process and introduced the USE, is now the chairman of the Higher Attestation Commission of Russia ... The current Minister Livanov successfully continues the "work" of his predecessors ...
TO.: At the end of the interview, I ask you to express an opinion on your vision of the necessary, top-priority tasks of our highest authority for the development of the country's economy to bring it to the leaders of the industrial world.
AB-m: If Vladimir Putin does not replace the liberal economy with a mobilization for the restoration of industry, then in the course of time the West will economically “wring” Russia. It's funny, but this was what the Assistant to the President Sergey Glazyev used to say about Ukraine, and now this idea can be fully attached to the evaluation of the economic policies of our liberal government and the liberal central bank acting on Western, liberal patterns.
Sergey Glazyev in Russia is neither heard by the authorities, nor by Vladimir Putin personally, but the president offers a showcasing, cheap economy in the country by reducing the salaries of officials by 10% (six months ago, their salary was raised by almost 30%, this is for information) instead of the transition expected by the Russians from a liberal market economy to a mobilization to restore the industry destroyed by the liberals. Industry will be restored, and no one will need a window-dressing with a reduction in the salary of officials!
Otherwise, the West will sweep away an economically weak Russia with all the salaries of the liberals who have been entrenched in power, turning Russia into a raw materials appendage of the industrially developed West ... Many also understand that it is not necessary to think about filling the American pod (Reserve Fund), but about restoring industry. depend on the price of oil!
The majority of Russians are against the liberal economy that has finished industrial, science and education of Russia and leading the country to a complete dependence on a stronger, market economy of the West ... And therefore it stands for a mobilization economy that provides for financed influences in and development of Russian production, instead of expanding oil and gas gas production and other raw materials for export to the West.
And the majority of Russians are not at all against statism. But the trouble is that this ideology is aimed at the development of the commodity sector in Russia, and not industrial production, as required by the Russians!
Now, if etatism changed the vector of application (from the increase in the extraction of raw materials to the commissioning of new industrial productions, and even we began to import nails and screws from China), then we would understand our president, whom the Gaidar-Yasinsky liberal lobby takes care of, filling in ours government and leading the liberal economy for more than two decades.
It was 1991 that year, when liberal forces seized power in the country, led to a catastrophe in the field of demography. In the 1990-ies, the people were subjected to a real attack, socio-economic, drug, alcohol and tobacco genocide. Liberals act as real occupiers, seize (privatize) those productions that can bring profits to their accomplices - oligarchs, destroy those systems that cannot bring them quick profits, “optimize” science, education, culture.
This is exactly how Russia needs to hurry in replacing its liberal economy, serving the industrial West with industrial raw materials, with a mobilization-industrial one in order to revive its industry that has become thin and ruined by liberals.
Let us recall the prophetic words of Professor MGATO Kasatonov: "... The mobilization economy helps any country that wages a war or is preparing for it to win or at least not lose. Russia is a special country in this regard, during the 20th century there were" hot "or "Cold" wars. Russia as a state, as a civilization can exist only in the conditions of a mobilization economy. This, as they say, is a "medical fact." All attempts to transfer the economy to market relations are simply attempts to destroy our state ... "
The mobilization economy is characterized by: “First of all, a high rate of accumulation, that is, the volume of investments in increasing fixed capital (real production). Countries that at various times demonstrated an economic miracle, like Germany or Japan after the war, increased the rate of accumulation. It reached them 30-35% and sometimes 40% of GDP. In the USSR, after World War II, the accumulation rate was at the level of 25%, and during industrialization, according to experts, 50-60% ... "
If we do not do this, then the raw materials economy of Russia will lose the battle to the industrial economy of the West! Putin can no longer sit on liberal and patriotic chairs at the same time. Otherwise, it will fall along with the economy.
The main liberal Egorushka Gaidar promised in the 90s that only the liberal economy would make the Russians richer and happier ... Chubais, Gref, Kudrin, Koch sang along with Yegorushka later, they deceived, the economy was in a stop, the industry was in ruins ... curse all liberals and their appointees in the face of effective managers and leaders ... But there would be no turning to national history, besides the film "Chapaev": "Whites will come - rob, red will come - rob, where will the poor peasant go?"
The question has remained open until the present time - the adoption of a mobilization economy is in line, in a Stalinist way and without liberals!
TO.: Dear Alin Yakovlevich, thank you very much for the interview, I wish you success in your creative work!
AB-m: Thank you, and your messenger - all the best and success!
Information