Russia and the East

10
Russia and the East


The global financial and economic crisis only accelerated the process of turning the Asia-Pacific Region (APR) into a powerful center for the economic development of the planet. In this regard, the countries of Southeast Asia are already successfully competing with the Western world and have significant potential to become the leaders of the planet in 10-15 years. And this despite the crisis that led to the recession of most European countries and the United States. Asia-Pacific continues to show good economic growth. So, if leading rating agencies predict 2011 0,1 - 1,5% GDP growth for the EU and the United States at 4, then countries in the Asia-Pacific region will reach 5-XNUMX%.

If the situation does not fundamentally change, then the financial and economic superiority of the West (and first of all the States) will come to an end. An alternative to the dollar system can be quite competitive Chinese yuan.

And in terms of military might, a number of countries in the Asia-Pacific region can already make significant competition to the West, and in the future their power will only increase. The armed forces of two giants, the largest countries of Asia - China and India, are developing rapidly. Both powers are turning into military superpowers, which are able to defend their interests far beyond the borders of the national territory. If Japan and South Korea come out of their current dependence on the United States, this will further change the balance of forces on the planet. It is necessary to take into account the fact that Pakistan, from an ally of the United States, becomes the "strategic partner" of China. Another interesting fact is that the combat capability of the ground forces of the APR countries is much higher than the readiness to fight against the NATO countries. This was clearly visible in Afghanistan and Iraq. In the North Atlantic bloc, everything rests only on the power of the United States. But, the internal problems of this country threaten to turn it into a regional power, the states may lose their superpower status in the very near future.

Therefore, it is very important what place the Russian Federation will occupy in the emerging system of international relations in the APR. Currently, the presence of the Russian Federation in the Asia-Pacific region can not be called noticeable. None of the major powers of this region consider the current Russian Federation as a real strategic partner, a possible ally. There is a serious territorial dispute with Japan. For China, we are a supplier of natural resources, partly military technology, no more. Even traditionally friendly India, not our ally, the position of the West is stronger there. In fact, to begin a more consistent promotion of Russia in the APR, you can almost from a “clean slate”.

So, after the collapse of the USSR, we practically left North Korea. Only after the last meeting of Russian President Dmitry Medvedev with Kim Jong Il in Ulan-Ude some prospects for reviving bilateral relations were outlined, but even here they have to start almost from scratch.

Russia has largely lost its military presence in the Asia-Pacific region, and left Vietnam, leaving a naval base in Kamrani. The Pacific Fleet of the Russian Federation - these are not updated remnants of the Soviet Union for a long time fleet. And this is in the region where we may have a conflict with Japan over the Kuril Islands, where there is a possibility of war on the Korean Peninsula, a clash between China and Taiwan, or a conflict in the Paracel Islands zone, the Spratly archipelago.

In fact, Russia is only formally participating in the integration processes in the vast expanses of the APR. So, she participates in ASEAN as a “partner for dialogue”. But Russia practically does not take a real part in the activities of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations.

Some Russian politicians, political scientists, and pro-Western intellectuals believe that Russia is part of the West, and the East is hostile to us from the start. Especially love to talk about the "Chinese threat." They want to turn Russia into the "avant-garde" of the West on the collision line of Western civilization, the United States and China. This is an ancient strategy of the West - “divide and conquer”, push your competitors together, and then get all the benefits. India is also trying on the same role in order to knock together two Asian giants.

You can not look at the APR only through the prism of relations with the Chinese. We have strategic interests on the Korean Peninsula, a long tradition of partnership with Vietnam and India, it is necessary to develop relations with other countries.

It must be remembered that the city of Vladivostok is named for good reason. Russia must defend its interests in the APR without looking back at the position of the West or China.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

10 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Motherland
    +1
    8 October 2011 07: 23
    Now for our country, China is more dangerous than the United States, we must set them against each other so that they themselves destroy
    1. zczczc
      +1
      9 October 2011 04: 13
      I absolutely support.

      Who minus, think? China has never been a friend to us.
  2. Russian
    +2
    8 October 2011 07: 55
    Russia and China are strategic partners, since the times of the USSR, in any conflict between the USA and China,
    Russia will have to get involved in all the serious things on the side of the partner,
    "Russian with Chinese - brothers forever!".
    (current without any illusions smile )
    1. Motherland
      +1
      8 October 2011 09: 18
      Well, the strategic partners are yes, but when China needs more land and resources, they will obviously look at us, in the event of a war between the United States and China, our government will be on the side of the United States for obvious reasons, but as they say keep your friends close, and the enemies are even closer
  3. +1
    8 October 2011 11: 04
    Quote: Motherland
    In case of war between the USA and China, then our government will be on the side of the USA

    So: The task of our president is to keep such partners as the United States and China at an equal distance and not to confuse themselves in a military conflict. If Russia accepts one of the parties, then this is the death of the country!
  4. strictly prohibited
    -2
    8 October 2011 11: 18
    whine a fictitious threat and stop whining already, whiners
  5. Net
    Net
    0
    8 October 2011 20: 12
    China and without us have enough opponents: Japan, Taiwan, India, although you won’t fight with the latter, there are mountains along the entire border. And if anyone is hindering China’s economic expansion, it’s the United States, putting sticks in wheels like in Africa. A major war is disadvantageous to anyone, it is easier to bomb the natives with bows all over the planet with oil, metals or drinking water. And it is better to conquer nuclear powers economically.
  6. zczczc
    0
    9 October 2011 04: 13
    So why did they give the base in Kamrani in 2001? In general, no one drove out - they left.
  7. 0
    9 October 2011 04: 43
    strictly prohibited Yesterday, 11:18
    -2
    whine a fictitious threat and stop whining already, whiners ARE THIS DOC.FILM RUSSIAN MAP THERE IS EVERYTHING LAYOUT!
    1. lavender essence
      0
      16 October 2011 01: 31
      you think what you write and how you write. angry
  8. 0
    16 October 2011 17: 04
    yes china is not a fictitious threat THERE IS SUCH DOC.FILM RUSSIAN MAP THERE IS EVERYTHING EXPLAINED, I apologize for the previous comment October 9.10.2011, 04. 43; XNUMX the flowers of life distracted and demanded attention.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"