Sincere traitors

Sincere traitors

Under current conditions, the main task for those who are ill for Russia is to preserve the integrity of the country and protect its sovereignty.


When you see a man from the camp of liberals, frankly speaking with an anti-Russian stance, you are not surprised. Representatives of such a public are still no-no, and they will remember the idea of ​​a “compact, controlled state”. Everything is clear with them. Other cases are surprising: when the integrity of Russia is questioned by people who do not consider themselves liberals, moreover, they consider themselves patriots.

Someone diligently convinces the population of Russia - we must part with the Caucasus. And, of course, Caucasians themselves are convinced of the same thing.


I had a few days ago a serious conversation with one acquaintance - the far-right, in the European sense of the word, character. A kind of "Russian Breivik." I will make a reservation - the case, to put it mildly, is not unique. This position holds, as it turned out later through the study of the mood in the Russian blogging industry, quite a lot of modern extreme right.

So, the talk in our conversation was that corruption was eating up the country, that the government was rotten, and the law enforcement agencies were often hostile to society. Yes, who would argue. But, in my opinion, now there is a paradoxical situation: any effective anti-system actions are beneficial for the Americans. And if someone or something brings down the existing, of course, vicious system, it will lead to the disintegration of Russia and the coming under the sly of NATO to us. This will be the end. This cannot be allowed - at any cost. It always seemed to the author of these lines that for any normal person this is an axiom ...

The citizen opponent, expressively sparkling with a neatly shaven bald head and scars from street fights, believed that, firstly, a small Russia is not so bad. That the national republics only suck money from the budget. Secondly, my interlocutor agreed to the point that they were especially frightened by the arrival of NATO, so that we would not be busied. And in general, he makes an assumption, maybe, with NATO, it will be better for a simple Russian.
Such an amazing, completely sincere person to whom his declared patriotism doesn’t interfere, in fact, with being a non-leader. Grants are not “sawing” - I'm pretty sure of this on 100%.

Another similar case is the notorious Herman Sterligov. Also very sincere, just a wonderful person. Although not without excesses, it is even good. One thing neglects all his virtues - he always does not get tired of moving the idea of ​​a “small happy country”. Yes exactly. According to Sterligov, big Russia is bad, we must part with the national republics, and everything will be fine. Anyway, a lot with whom to leave.

His words are worthy to quote them: “We must urgently grant independence to Tatarstan, Bashkiria, the Caucasus. [...] Only to part with each other is the only peaceful way out of the interethnic and interfaith trap. ” And again: “It will turn out a small country in the approximate borders of Muscovite XVI century - a country with one language and one faith. And our good neighbors will live around: Great Chechnya, Great Tataria and other countries, too, with one language and one faith. ” What is it painfully reminiscent? The Great Middle East, Great Circassia - the stages of the American plan.
And, finally, the third strong impression of the end of summer and autumn of this year: Alexey Navalny, “Stop feeding the Caucasus” campaign. This person can hardly be called sincere, however, he enjoys a certain influence.

Realizing that his anti-corruption frenzy was already fed up with everything, but it is not relevant in the light of the fact that the EP, perhaps, is preparing for a “plum”, the citizen pravdorub clung to another “hot” topic. Here, the ears of the US State Department are sticking up so that at least take aim. Although this is not directly voiced, the main content of his message is the secession of the North Caucasus from Russia. Navalny himself will not say that. But read his supporters, everything will become clear. This topic is American to the bone, they are promoting it, they are implementing this scenario - at an accelerated pace and in all possible ways - from the hustle and bustle of blogs to terrorist attacks in Dagestan.
Activity in this direction has intensified since the spring - it was then, in the same LiveJournal, in the tops, daily articles began to appear on the topic of "why we need to part with the Caucasus." Someone very well can not wait to have this happen as soon as possible. Someone diligently convinces the population of Russia - we must part with the Caucasus. And, of course, Caucasians themselves are convinced of the same thing.

It will be quite adequate to build the “friend or foe” axis, based on whether someone is working or in favor of Russia's sovereignty and its territorial integrity, or its actions and / or words indicate the opposite.


I will repeat - Navalny is absolutely not sincere and happens in the USA. Samples to put nowhere. But it so happened that he has built up a reputation for himself, he knows how to be convincing, and people believe him. Unfortunately, this is the case - just sincere, passionate people, those who love Russia with all their hearts, but are subject to foreign influence and their own momentary emotional outbursts, believe him. The campaign for the separation of the Caucasus, even if the separation is not voiced as the ultimate goal, even if it is only a vector, is much more dangerous than pulling out official dirty laundry.
We will not lie to ourselves - all three, and they are given as examples - traitors. Like others like them. Like the creators of the "Arabic scenarios", which are going to present the Nobel Peace Prize for having thrown their relatively prosperous countries into chaos until recently. You were “bred” or you skillfully “breed” others - it doesn't matter. This is a betrayal in fact. Betrayal of the interests of his people, his country. Traitors deserve only contempt. Or let them repent, or society will spit in their faces, curse them and their families.

If the collapse of Russia begins, it will in itself become historical the catastrophe of a great state, the abuse of its centuries-old history. This breakup will not be an intellectual divorce of spouses who are bored with each other, as some try to imagine. The USSR collapsed terribly - in the event of the collapse of Russia there will be blood - even more blood. There will not be, German Lvovich, a "small, happy Orthodox country." There will be NATO attacks designed to finish off the last resistance, there will be American soldiers stomping our land, killing men, raping children and women. All the countries with which this happened have gone through similar.

And most importantly - after that Russia will not be. Everything. Even if the people mentioned by me survive, after they will only have to commit suicide, so as not to see what they have done. There will be a US planetary victory. Victory over Russia. Do this want sincere people who are ready to sacrifice the integrity of Russia? Do they want this world for their children?
In modern Russian society a great many different forces have been formed. Sometimes it is difficult to figure out who is in a constructive position, and who is laying the vector more than dangerous.

It will quite adequately form the attitude towards structures and people, build an “friend-foe” axis, based on whether this someone is working or advocating Russia's sovereignty and its territorial integrity, or its actions and / or words indicate the opposite.
Everyone in Russia, from the president to the ordinary citizen, should clearly feel and realize: although the economy and the resolution of internal political conflicts are important, it is necessary to be guided by the main ones. And the main thing is the preservation of our country. Russia, without which there will be no us, without which we will turn into lonely atoms without a Motherland, whose history the new masters of the world will soon quickly erase from the memory of post-humanity.
Author:
Originator:
http://evrazia.org
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

30 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Vadivak 7 October 2011 13: 41 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Is German Sterligov one of the true traitors?

    Excerpts
    Repeal the stupid godless constitution. The highest criterion for the correctness of the laws adopted is to consider their compliance with the Holy Scriptures. Any situation contrary to the Holy Scriptures is considered illegal. Proceed from the fact that the highest law is the law of God. Beyond the law should be all that is cursed by God.
    The head of state takes the oath of allegiance in the Septuagint and New Testament translation of Cyril and Methodius.
    Any talk about drug treatment is the essence of drug addiction.
    The real fight against drug addiction is the death penalty for the seller and the death penalty for the addict. This method does not require proof, having proven itself in a number of countries. A striking example is Afghanistan. The largest drug producer has no addiction at all on the territory. Millions of healthy children grow up who do not know the horrors of drug addiction. Explanation - the addict has the right to kill anyone without any Sharia court, like a dog. Addicts in Afghanistan are only in territories controlled by the Americans.
    All talk about humanity, treatment, help, etc. ultimately lead to the destruction of millions of our children. Such examples are not few. The closest is Russia.
    In the state system, take as a model the SOCIETY OF JUDGES of the ancient, still Orthodox Israel period from Moses to Samuel. Introduce the election of judges.
    Criteria for choosing a judge: Orthodox religion, excellent knowledge of the Holy Scriptures, at least 50 years old, the presence of decent children, respectful attitude to the candidate in this locality.
    Determine the main basis of any sentence as being consistent with the definitions of scripture on the subject.
    The chief judge shall be considered the head of state with the responsibility of him to monitor the sentences of judges in the country. To cancel all formalities of legal proceedings, including the legal profession and the prosecutor's office. The trial will be swift and fair.
    The sentence of a judge must be final and not appealable. In addition to death sentences.
    In the case of an unfair sentence, the judge must be punished equal to the unfair sentence.
    Well, etc.
  2. Asmoday 7 October 2011 13: 47 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Russia has always been multinational! there can be no talk of any department of any sections there! not for this our glorious heroes defended their homeland, not for this our grandfathers and great-grandfathers fought in the Second World War ...
    those who call for separation must be judged by Article 275. High treason "of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation !!!
    1. kosmos84 7 October 2011 16: 07 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      completely right! if only Chechnya were lost in 90's, Russia wasn’t there now! I live in rKomi and there are also conversations about secession (like we have all the resources) and I’m talking about who should separate from the Kirov region chtoli! our country as one the body!
      1. Ivan35
        Ivan35 7 October 2011 18: 53 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        I agree and support! Separate from the Caucasus - then from the Tatars - then from the Yakuts - and what will remain ?! Russia is strong as an empire - and vice versa should be reborn - to unite with Belarus and Kazakhstan! And then maybe with Ukraine!

        And you have to convince people - if there are too many Russians who seem to have divorced in Russia - but "narrow-minded" nationalists - who are ready to insult both Ukrainians and Kazakhs and remain alone "within Moscow" - he always repeated - they put these Natsiks in the USSR and Stalin shot them as enemies of the empire - and I fully support him in this
        1. kosmos84 7 October 2011 19: 05 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          nice to read normal quotes
        2. aldashckin2012
          aldashckin2012 7 October 2011 19: 52 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          Stalin did the right thing. This scum doesn’t know what a civil war is. They will perish in it
          1. Uhalus 8 October 2011 23: 28 New
            • -3
            • 0
            -3
            I support. Must be Great Russia. And the inhabitants of the republics can only be used as cheap local power, not letting them in the Russian central cities. Under socialism, they were protected from all kinds of bays (or whatever they are called there), they built cities and industry for them, gave them education, medicine, promoted their art (br, I don’t like oriental musical creativity), their work and their peoples glorified , and they ate at our expense, but us in FIG? They forgot that without Russia, they would also drive rams back and forth in their steppes and semi-deserts and would die dozens and hundreds of diseases! - the plague was only kicked out under socialism (and then restrained), and again the Russian doctors. And to grind, grind, and grind into their stupid and cunning heads the idea that without Russians they are nobody and they will not call them in any way and hobnob with their operetnymi governments to obtain territories and resources.
            1. kosmos84 8 October 2011 23: 41 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              I just do not understand anything
            2. Marat
              Marat 9 October 2011 02: 20 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              You are a fascist! All under one comb. Thus, you can only ruin everything and set up all the peoples against the Russians
              1. Ivan35
                Ivan35 9 October 2011 16: 23 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                That's right - I support Marat! We must act with wisdom and cunning! To attract friendly peoples - to strengthen the union of Russian peoples - to build a large, strong multinational Russia - and even better, the USSR-2
                So we will strengthen the position of the Russian people
                And with such fascist comments from us, everyone will run into FIG. If Unalus thinks so personally then for God's sake - at home in the kitchen - but on the Internet publicly announce this ?! Only harm from such a statement - so that the Natsiks will now run away and begin the "srach" of another
            3. Uhalus 9 October 2011 17: 29 New
              • -2
              • 0
              -2
              Strange ... And what did I say wrong?
        3. NUT
          NUT 8 October 2011 09: 53 New
          • -2
          • 0
          -2
          Quote: Ivan35
          Separate from the Caucasus - then from the Tatars - then from the Yakuts - and what remains

          only urban campaigns and those with whom we do not drink do not see the difference between a flock of sheep, a herd of cows and a pack of stray dogs,
          but the inhabitants of Sagra and hundreds of thousands of the same villages, towns and villages of ours, this difference oh, as you know
  3. Ion coaelung
    Ion coaelung 7 October 2011 14: 14 New
    • -1
    • 0
    -1
    Harosh divide and litter ... For centuries they have been doing this, they can’t share!
  4. Hannibal
    Hannibal 7 October 2011 14: 19 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    There is no need to separate, it is necessary on the contrary to be friends. We have enough shit, and they have enough for us, we need to remove it and everything will be fine ...
    We always fought together shoulder to shoulder, because no one could defeat us ...
    And now American pigs pit us against each other, better we all come together in a flock and kill this pig !!!
  5. Owl
    Owl 7 October 2011 14: 32 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Russia over the past centuries grew and increased in size, became stronger, only with the advent of new "rulers" (from Humpback to Medvedyonka) did great Russia begin to lose territory (the collapse of the USSR, the continuous war in the North Caucasus, the weakening of the State), hatred of the "leaders" appeared to the people of the country, Russia has become a raw materials appendage and puppet of the United States. Russia needs to FIGHT for the State, we have not yet been destroyed, traitors and corrupt thieves need a fair trial and a harsh sentence (destruction).
  6. Konstantm 7 October 2011 15: 22 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Give 1937 !!!?
  7. Volkhov
    Volkhov 7 October 2011 15: 48 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    National suburbs are divided into flooded type of Kalmykia, Bashkiria, which no one bothers, and non-flooded type of the Caucasus. Look at the amers - they do not care about New Orleans, but do not tear them away from Afghanistan - because they are not crabs, they need dry places.
    1. kosmos84 7 October 2011 19: 34 New
      • -1
      • 0
      -1
      tepn understood the meaning of what you wrote
  8. keng
    keng 7 October 2011 16: 43 New
    • -3
    • 0
    -3
    Well, someone really can’t wait ------- Someone carefully persuades ---------- after that Russia will no longer be. ,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,, What kind of amateur nonsense? It is necessary to resolve issues in accordance with today's circumstances, and not "somewhere, someone, probably"
  9. ztk1
    ztk1 7 October 2011 18: 32 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    The result of the activities of sincere traitors on the surface: the area of ​​the Russian Empire at the time of the abdication of Nicholas II was 20,0 million square kilometers with a population of 156,4 million souls (including Finland). 1925 - 137,1 million souls in the territory - 21,4 million square meters. km, - (the Bolsheviks somewhere pressed the Kemsk parish somewhere). The total area of ​​the territory of the Soviet Union before the collapse in 1991 was 22,4 million square meters. km The area of ​​the modern territory of Russia is 17 million square meters. km - i.e. Lenin managed to put the state together, such a bad Stalin coped with the task even better, Brezhnev did not lose anything, but this is how it happened to others, we know. The negative trend must be broken, however.
  10. sirToad
    sirToad 7 October 2011 18: 43 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Yes, the idea of ​​independence is carefully crammed into everything and everyone. and under this pipe in the Altai Mountains some gentlemen rummage around with a geodetic instrument with a German accent and military bearing. and another interesting fact: a certain organization with the characteristic name "SION" offers vast tracts of land in the Altai Territory and rep. Altai. our foreign "brothers"
    1. kosmos84 7 October 2011 19: 07 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      that according to legend, salvation from the disaster 2012 by ren-tv itself watched
    2. Volkhov
      Volkhov 7 October 2011 19: 07 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      The key word is MOUNTAIN Altai. This is an unsinkable area.
    3. kosmos84 7 October 2011 19: 14 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      and what kind of ZION
      1. zczczc
        zczczc 9 October 2011 18: 01 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D0%B8%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%BC
  11. sirToad
    sirToad 7 October 2011 19: 28 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    but hell knew their mom! they’re embodying the very idea (see the comment above) that according to the results of 2012, the chosen people will be saved. and a stranger from the wicked will have to be cleaned legally.
    Moreover, the root of our imperious tandem has long since there bought zemlyants say 1000 hectares. I can’t say for the accuracy of the size, but that such an estate exists is a fact
  12. NUT
    NUT 7 October 2011 23: 42 New
    • -2
    • 0
    -2
    the vertical of power caved in under the Caucasians (YouTube) and it seems that none of those present has ever left the house and never touched those sons of the mountains
    they didn’t explain who and why you were, fundamentally different from them
    they did not solemnly promise that we will slaughter everyone, drown in the sea, water your roof with blood
    somehow on the market, a man for his wife convincingly obscenities: TODAY YOU FEED THEM, AND TOMORROW THEY WILL CUT YOU
    1. Uhalus 8 October 2011 23: 37 New
      • -1
      • 0
      -1
      So they do not need to be separated. They just don’t have to give the bad billions that they buy cool cars for themselves, cool mosques they build, drop-dead holidays are rolled up (recently there was one) and they grow rich with indecentness. Let them build on their own! And they need to periodically train special forces. And also - do not let into Russia! Like 60 - 65 years ago - by train and back to Chechnya, Dagestan and other republics ... Or to Siberia, remove snow and dig fossils. At the worst, the law must be equal for everyone! And if there is no law, then the law will have to become us. The only trouble is that the Russian people are inert and fragmented, to put it mildly, until we wash ourselves with blood, we won’t rise :( I already have experience of adequate surrender.
      1. Uhalus 9 October 2011 17: 32 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Again ... Have you never been in conflict with visiting Caucasians? Have you ever been insulted in the face at the bazaar? They didn’t promise to kill, if you don’t give a good mark for the lack of an answer at the institute? Well, you're in luck! I wish I were in your place ...
  13. zczczc
    zczczc 8 October 2011 04: 42 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    The difference between a Caucasian and a Russian is that in any conflict, the Russian will seek a solution, and the Caucasian will assess the possibilities for victory. For a Russian, victory is a peaceful Caucasian with a plow, for a Caucasian, victory is a victory in every sense.
    As our kings did, so we need to - keep in check, since we understand power above all else. It’s impossible to pay tribute to them forever.
    1. Uhalus 9 October 2011 17: 33 New
      • -1
      • 0
      -1
      Here! A little higher and I'm talking about it. Only in sharper terms.
  14. iulai
    iulai 9 October 2011 06: 41 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Russia, forever and forever !!!! and other thoughts should not be !!!!
  15. DEfindER 10 October 2011 11: 23 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    When Gorbach gave so-called freedom and stopped planting enemies of the people, he signed the death sentence to his native country (although now his native country has long been not Russia). Having given free rein to all these mongrels of the West, to all those who hate their own people and those who have their homeland where they live better and not where he was born, he killed his country .. I just have nothing more to say, what has been built for decades is very difficult and painful they were cleansing, liberating, from the enemies that flooded Russia from the beginning of the 20th century, all this was destroyed by one person .. did he take on too much ...
    And when everything collapsed, then the West did not miss the opportunity to continue the destruction by unleashing a war in Chechnya and taking away thousands of lives (much more than in Afghanistan) And when the Caucasus was defended by the great Russian Blood, he tried to get into the Caucasus through Georgia, but miscalculated a little. I think that the next blow will be delivered to the very heart of our country, namely, to our souls, to our worldview, the awareness of us as a nation, they will destroy all this, and they have already managed to do a lot ..
  16. MAD. 75rus
    MAD. 75rus 14 January 2012 10: 22 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    People look back! Every Russian has relatives in the Yakuts, Tatars, Caucasians, Russians and other peoples of our multinational country! We are figuratively speaking all relatives! This is a legacy of the history of the USSR! These traitors who talk about the collapse of Russia should be planted a long way north. ! There are just not enough workers :)
    It’s necessary to unite on the contrary, what kind of affairs are these? To Ukraine so that I can go to my relatives for days at the border!
    The Americans are afraid that we will unite, and they are doing everything possible to prevent this, they then understand that even with a partial restoration of the territory of the USSR our country with you will become even more invincible even more! And right now they say about the authorities that they are crooks and thieves like that, they lie to put it mildly! they just see that Putin is reviving the country, and they’re drowning it! I don’t argue there are thieves and crooks there! They’re in any country, it’s just that Putin is not a god so that they all evaporate, I I think that measures to combat them will be tightened! Putin, of course, not always, but he did a lot of good for the country, respect to him! I’ll go vote for him !!
  17. gojesi
    gojesi 20 January 2012 23: 11 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    the whole world integrates and unites, and we are pushed to confrontation and separation. The more Russian people understand this, the more uneasy Atlantists feel ... You know how sad Finland was when they found out that Ukraine was showing interest in the Customs Union !!! And so the whole West ... They do not need a strong Russia. They need the poor and the poor, as their raw materials appendage ...