Doublethink Europe. Rereading J. Orwell

27
Doublethink Europe. Rereading J. OrwellGeorge Orwell's dystopia “Animal Farm” and “1984” appeared a few decades ago, but their fantastic images are superimposed on today's day, conveying the long-predicted decline of Europe.

In the "Animal Farm" starving animals on an alcoholic Jones' farm raise a rebellion and chase the owner to the sound of the song "Animals of England". As a result of this bestial "color revolution", a group of pigs headed by boar Napoleon, who declares the seven commandments of freedom and equality, seizes power. Pigs move to Jones' house, put on his clothes, drink his wine, play cards with people - neighbors from other farms. Gradually, the memory of the revolution is erased, and Napoleon the boar cancels six of the seven commandments, leaving only one: "In the barnyard, all animals are equal, but some are more equal than others." Step by step, he gets rid of his former comrades-in-arms and cracks down with the help of the chained dogs fostered by him with dissenters and dissenters. And the boar Squeal with brainless sheep every day convinces animals that life on the farm is getting better and better.

In the dystopian "1984" (the book was published in 1949 year), this topic is being developed. The image of the "Animal Farm" is complemented by the superpower Oceania, which emerged as a result of the merger of America and Britain. Oceania is fighting for the possession of other parts of the world. This war is fraudulent, since it must last forever, without victory. Its main goal is to preserve the existing system, destroying not only human lives, but also the fruits of human labor, since the general increase in welfare threatens a hierarchical society with death. If an enormous mass of people become literate, learn to think independently, they will get rid of the privileged minority as superfluous. War and hunger help to keep people who have become stupefied with poverty in a world of illusions.

In Oceania, all power is concentrated in the hands of the Angsots (English Socialism) Party, which is divided into the Outer Party (extras) and the Inner Party (elected). In the hands of the Inner Party all power and all wealth are concentrated. Members of the Inner Party receive a high salary and have access to such rare products as tea, white bread, milk, real coffee, wine and fruit. Members of the Outer Party live in poverty and are constantly monitored by the Police of Thought.

The lowest caste is the non-partisan proletariat (the breasts). Prols are left to their own devices, crime and speculation are spreading among them. Below the prols are workers from the conquered territories. In addition, in the novel there are hints of the existence of castes, which are even higher than the Inner Party.

The party is personified by the omnipresent Big Brother, his portraits can always be seen everywhere. Angsots requires the complete subordination of the people - mental, moral and physical.

The main means of communication in Oceania is newspeak, which is formed according to the principle “it is impossible to do (and even think) what cannot be expressed in words.” With each new edition of the Newspeak dictionary, words and concepts alien to the dominant ideology were thrown out of it.

The main way of thinking of the citizens of Oceania "1984" - doublethink. This is the ability to hold simultaneously two opposing views and, on a signal, change one's opinion to the opposite.

On the pediment of the building in which the hero of the novel works, slogans hang:

Peace is war

Freedom is slavery

Ignorance is power

The key word of the newspeak is “white black”. It combines two mutually exclusive concepts and implies "the habit of blatantly, contrary to the facts, to insist that black is white."

The work of the state is provided by four ministries. 1. The Ministry of Peace (Minimir) is responsible for conducting military actions and information about the events of the ongoing war between Oceania and other world powers. 2. The Ministry of Love (Minilub) is engaged in recognizing and re-educating thought criminals who are physically and morally broken and then sent to the “101 room” to experience “the worst thing in the world” until their love for Big Brother replaces their remnants of independent thinking and human feelings 3. Ministry of Truth (Ministries) is engaged in falsification stories, the dissemination of misinformation and the publication of primitive literature for prols. 4. The Ministry of Abundance (Minizo) distributes scarce resources remaining after meeting military needs.

In Orwell’s dystopias, economics exists only through war and for war. The basic idea is that, without war, sooner or later, there will be an overproduction of goods, ideological disorder, discontent and, in the end, a revolution. Therefore, in order to preserve the personal power of the rulers, there is an endless war, the main purpose of which is the regular destruction of resources and linking the population exclusively to survival concerns. Victories in such a war can not be, small successes (depicted as decisive victories) are replaced by minor defeats and so on without end.

The most serious of the possible crimes in Oceania is thought crime, punishable by death. Any careless thought of a member of Angsots, any careless gesture or a word can become a crime of thought. The facial expression, which is incorrect from the point of view of the ideology of the ruling party, is also a form of thought crime — face crime. The police of thoughts are engaged in the fight against thought criminals in Oceania, the interrogations of the accused are held in the Ministry of Love. In order to identify suspects, the surveillance agents of thought and volunteers, including the closest relatives of thought criminals, lead the citizens.

Reading a book written more than 65 years ago, one cannot help wondering at the prophetic genius of George Orwell. In those days, when Europe came to its senses from the war, began to build a new and, it seemed, a society free from Nazism, the English writer saw what was going on. The enthusiasm for cooperation with the West, which arose in Russia after the collapse of the USSR, did not allow for some time to discern that the political scene of Europe was seized by boars and screamers, who adapted themselves to use such organizations as the Council of Europe, the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, the European Court of Human Rights discretion and solely in the interests of the “barnyard”. All these institutions in time began to resemble the Orwellian ministries of truth, love, peace, and abundance. And it became finally clear that they serve the main idea of ​​the “barnyard” - the idea of ​​the ongoing war of modern “Oceania” with the whole world around. Now Ukraine is in the focus of their attention.

And they, Europeans, as predicted by D.Oruell, will always be in their own eyes those who, under the conditions of the declared equality, are “more equal” than others.

It seems that Russian diplomacy is only now beginning to recover from the stress that has caused her organic double-thinking of Western “partners”, all the while trying to push Russia into the “101 room”. Now we have to pay for a quarter of a century of illusions of equal cooperation with the Euro-Atlantic “stockyard”. If it were not for these illusions, no one would be surprised today, why, on the basis of the principle of double-mindedness, Russia is being made responsible for non-compliance with the Minsk agreements and they are preparing new sanctions against it by the time Kiev finally breaks these agreements. Why, stubbornly asserting that white is black, the West accuses Moscow of immanent aggression. Or why the Ministry of Peace surrounds Russia with new military bases and antimissiles. Similarly, the reproduction of US secret prisons throughout the world should not come as a surprise, because it is a direct result of the Ministry of Love, which, after the very strange terrorist act 9 / 11, turned into a superministry. And there are absolutely no questions about the state of minds of the European public, which are daily washed from the TV screens of the Ministry of Truth. Add to this that today Big Brother entered every European and American home through computer networks. To survive, the regime of boars and screamers must keep everyone under control. That which is not a developed part of the “barnyard” is obviously antagonistic to this regime.

European leaders will not come to Moscow on Victory Day 9 of May, not only because in their mind, stricken by doublethink, Russia attacked Ukraine. They will not come yet because they are afraid to commit a crime of thought to Big Brother from overseas. Almost compassion causes Angela Merkel, who discovered that from all sides lined up listening devices Big Brother, who turned the German intelligence into his watchdog. She has in agony to get rid of the illusions that the sovereignty of Germany belongs to the people of Germany.

It is impossible not to regret and Francois Hollande, trapped in a mousetrap with his "Mistral". The poor French president is torn between the need to take away bread from his own shipbuilders, knowing that France will not forgive him or his party, and the fear of being sent to the “101 room”.

Polish politicians deserve special sympathy. It is as if they do not know that the transatlantic boar Napoleon will never raise them to the position of “more equal” and their fate is to be content with leftovers from the master's table. But they cannot but realize that the ban on the passage of Russian bikers through Poland in honor of the Great Victory Day is a spit on the graves of not only Soviet soldiers who sacrificed their lives for the liberation of Poland, but also those of their compatriots who were slaughtered by Ukrainian Nazis in Volyn.

And all this is very sad, because the activity of the “cattle yard” revolves around one thing - to make the war for the survival of “Oceania” a permanent war.

George Animal Orwell's "Animal Farm" ends with a scene in which quarreling people and animals are difficult to distinguish from each other. However, we, unlike the author, want to believe that the differences will remain. In Europe, in addition to the power of boars and screamers, as well as sheep schooled by propaganda, there are people of sober reason and goodwill who refuse to put on the Ministry of Truth cap. Sooner or later they will abolish the orders of the “barnyard” as unnatural and offensive to the descendants of a great European civilization in the past.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

27 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. mad
    +18
    2 May 2015 18: 52
    Since the time of the bombing of Yugoslavia, I can’t get rid of the thought that 1984 of Orwell has become a handbook in Fashington and Londonobad. And the Farmyard (probably in the form of comics) periodically flips through the husky Psaki and company.
    1. +5
      2 May 2015 21: 00
      Quote: mad
      1984 Orwella has become a handbook in Fashington and Londonobad

      Sobsno, Orwell conceived "1984" as a work exposing the totalitarian regime in general and the USSR in particular (Orwell's anti-communism is known for his statements in the comments to the novel in the press). BUT! What he did - and the book is great, no doubt - was an instruction, a guide to action for the West. Even under the Soviet Union, we did not have what Orwell described, but now appear in Kiev with a red flag, sickle and hammer-like - the right-wing people will tear it into St. George's ribbons. I don't even feel like talking about the Ukrainian Ministries of Peace and Truth - previous speakers have said everything. To remember the mischievous Psaku with her "truth", which is "well known" - already involuntarily the mouth stretches in a smile. And about the American "peacekeepers" you can talk for hours, only listing their bases around Russia.

      So Orwell’s novel shot in the wrong direction where the author was aiming. But the shot, I must admit, is powerful!
      1. 0
        2 May 2015 21: 48
        Orwell - he is everywhere.
        1. +1
          3 May 2015 00: 04
          Thanks for the article - it seems to be a very instructive parable! I never thought I'd understand Orwell before. Well, the novel "The White Guard" is my reference book.
  2. +11
    2 May 2015 18: 57
    I would also advise re-reading, and reading to someone, the White Guard, Bulgakova. in essence an explanation of what is happening in Ukraine.
    1. +10
      2 May 2015 20: 03
      Bulgakov and Paustovsky, indeed, perfectly described the events of that time and revealed the reasons. But Orwell did not just describe what was happening - he was able to foresee the future! Well, with the Boar - generally 100% hit. Then he even surpassed Nostradamus. laughing
      1. +5
        2 May 2015 21: 09
        Quote: BMP-2
        Then he even surpassed Nostradamus.

        By the way, about Nostradamus.

        I remember that at the peak of the fashion for predictors (the first half of the 90's), we were actively told that Nostradamus wrote that the "tiger from the East" will come and make kirdyk all over Europe, will rule the world.

        Then under such a tiger Saddam was rowed. And where is that Saddam? Yes, and tigers and Iraq, in my opinion, are not found ...

        But here, at VO, someone once said that the St. George ribbon was "tiger flowers". And we recently had the Year of the Tiger. And there are still tigers in the Far East. Perhaps the interpreters of Nostradamus mixed up the East? Maybe it was the East of Europe?

        This is all about foresight. It is unlikely that Saddam would have the power to overwhelm Europe and rule the world. But in Russia-easily ...
    2. 0
      2 May 2015 23: 25
      Quote: kotvov
      I would also advise re-reading, and reading to someone, the White Guard, Bulgakova. in essence an explanation of what is happening in Ukraine.

      Or at least watch the film "Days of the Turbins"!
  3. +12
    2 May 2015 18: 59
    Great article. Thank you Author hi. I will follow your work.
    Special sympathy deserves Polish politicians.
    And here I do not agree: they do not deserve it. request
    And they do not notice their "inequality". Well, perhaps only when they have dinner with colleagues in a restaurant. And then: in one single ...
  4. +7
    2 May 2015 19: 02
    Now such books are hiding far, far, so that no one has any associations!
  5. +8
    2 May 2015 19: 07
    The official attitude to Orwell in the Soviet Union can be expressed in the words of the chairman of the foreign commission of the Union of Soviet Writers Mikhail Yakovlevich Apletin, who signed the following curriculum vitae attached to the case on Orwell, which was stored in the Materials on the United Kingdom of the USSR Writers Union:
    George Orwell is an English writer, Trotskyist. In 1936 he was in Spain in the ranks of the POUM police. Orwell has a close relationship with the American Trotskyist Partisan Review magazine. George Orwell - author of the infamous book about the Soviet Union from 1917 to 1944 - "Farm animals."

    - Curriculum Vitae dated 26. V. 1947 signed by Mic. Apletina
    1. 3axap
      0
      2 May 2015 19: 42
      Quote: Bayonet
      The official attitude to Orwell in the Soviet Union can be expressed in the words of the chairman of the foreign commission of the Union of Soviet Writers Mikhail Yakovlevich Apletin, who signed the following curriculum vitae attached to the case on Orwell, which was stored in the Materials on the United Kingdom of the USSR Writers Union:
      George Orwell is an English writer, Trotskyist. In 1936 he was in Spain in the ranks of the POUM police. Orwell has a close relationship with the American Trotskyist Partisan Review magazine. George Orwell - author of the infamous book about the Soviet Union from 1917 to 1944 - "Farm animals."

      - Curriculum Vitae dated 26. V. 1947 signed by Mic. Apletina

      I really read both works, and I didn’t know that the writer has such a reputation. In general, I’ve been used to judging by the content of the work and not by recommendations. It’s like with Bulgakov. I like all the works and stories, but the Master and Margarita started three times and so to the end neosilil. hi Maybe he didn’t start reading in the mood? I do not know.
      1. +2
        2 May 2015 19: 58
        Regarding the Master. Read more. Sooner or later it will pass.
      2. +2
        2 May 2015 20: 04
        Quote: 3axap
        but the Master and Margarita, he started three times and so completely overpowered. Maybe he didn’t start reading in the mood?

        I offer you the following way of reading this work. First you read the line about the Master, Woland and his retinue, Margarita, Stepa Likhodeev, Rimsky, etc., skipping the line about Ga Nocri and Pilate, and then vice versa. Must like it. A brilliant work.
        Hi Zahar! drinks
    2. -3
      2 May 2015 20: 09
      Orwell began as a communist, came to help the communists in
      Spain during the civil war. But there in a cruel way
      disillusioned with the communists. And "Animal's Farm" (highly recommend!),
      and 1984 are clearly written about the Stalinist regime, as it were, transferred to England.
      To refer to Orwell as an anti-European romance is purely 1984 laughing
      1. +3
        2 May 2015 21: 10
        Then Orwell is just a visionary.
  6. +1
    2 May 2015 19: 10
    Orwell's 1984 is a very prophetic work. Only then he could not have known about the Internet, which greatly weakens the influence of the "Ministry of Truth". And the scientific and technological revolution, which has moved labor productivity so high that numerous breaks have become unnecessary. In its purest form, such a scenario became impossible. But in terms of managing society with waterfalls of lies - here the process is in full swing.
  7. +1
    2 May 2015 19: 19
    The process is on! Everything is logical!
  8. +2
    2 May 2015 19: 34
    During perestroika, several fat magazines published Orwell. It was fashionable to read his works. But you probably shouldn't make a fetish out of him.
    1. +4
      2 May 2015 20: 28
      Well, this is because Orwell's works were positioned as "anti-communist" and "a parody of the USSR" well, plus everything he was still a Trotskyist! and the attitude towards Trotskyists during the time of the Father of Nations was unequivocal - an enemy of the people! although Orwell could not write about the USSR - he was never in the USSR! Orwell, of course, became disillusioned with "Trotskyism" and this left an imprint on his works. More likely, Nazi Germany (Animal Farm) was the prototype, but "1984" is the good old "decaying west" , in 1948 the flywheel of the Cold War was already spinning - i.e. the same processes were taking place as they are now taking place - the escalation of the situation, the arms race, military hysteria (Russians are coming !!!), diplomatic and military provocations, falsification of history; "witch hunt" - all this was accompanied by streams of lies in the media
      so George wrote about the West, the author’s imagination was simply ahead of the flow of history, and now it’s clear to everyone what he meant, even the liberals stopped referring to him
      1. 0
        3 May 2015 07: 52
        Quote: Russian Uzbek
        Rather, the prototype was fascist Germany (Animal Farm), but "1984" is the good old "decaying west",

        Well, this is a clear attempt to put everything upside down!
        "According to Orwell's peer, British political analyst, editor-in-chief of the New Statesman magazine Kingsley Martin, Orwell looked at the USSR with bitterness, through the eyes of a revolutionary disillusioned with the brainchild of the revolution, and believed that it, the revolution, had been betrayed, and Orwell considered the main traitor, the embodiment of evil Stalin. " "The British conservative politician, member of parliament Christopher Hollis claims that what really made Orwell indignant was that as a result of the revolution that took place in Russia and the subsequent overthrow of the old ruling classes, accompanied by a bloody civil war and no less bloody terror, no power came to power. a classless society, as the Bolsheviks promised, and the new ruling class, much more ruthless and unprincipled than the previous ones ousted by it "Here is the original, check out http://gruzdoff.ru/wiki/George_Orwell
        1. 0
          3 May 2015 14: 35
          well, would you give me a link to some other resource but to pedivics? I wrote that Orwell was a Trotskyist and this left an imprint on the works as a Trotskyist he did not like Stalin
          but to give references to "British Conservative politicians"? from what has already become a parable in the tongues because of the one-sided and biased sanctification of Wikipedia?
          and one more thing: do you really think that Orwell could call a spade a spade in 1948? indicate directly what he means? like writing about the west? he was forced to use allegorical images otherwise the west would never have printed it! but the fact that after his death the Western propaganda machine was able to turn everything upside down, well, time also showed - what he actually wrote about and what "civilizational values" he had in mind!
          1. 0
            3 May 2015 18: 58
            Quote: Russian Uzbek
            after his death, the western propaganda machine managed to turn everything upside down

            All clear ......
    2. 0
      2 May 2015 21: 14
      During the perestroika, even those bastards offered us to read it, and we didn’t lose it, ear_lep_, we ate it then.
  9. Vezhchel
    +2
    2 May 2015 19: 40
    The modern West is an illustration for 1984. Ukraine is just the tip of the iceberg.
  10. Tribuns
    +3
    2 May 2015 19: 52
    "Rule Britain over the seas!" or the British have always hurt Russia ...

    I don’t like, sinful, English ... For some reason, it is hushed up that the Englishman’s story “Animal Farm” was a kind of allegory for the events that took place in Russia in 1917, and “1984” was a kind of continuation of the situation in Russia - a forecast or prediction the development of a totalitarian hierarchical system based on sophisticated physical and spiritual enslavement, permeated by universal fear, hatred and denunciation ...

    Well, the British did not like Stalin, who created the great Soviet Union with powerful industry, science and education, and its own nuclear weapons ... And, we still use the legacy and fruits of the Stalinist state, which the liberals-privatizers could not completely ruin and which Vladimir Putin is now raising from his knees ...
  11. +4
    2 May 2015 20: 07
    I read both books during the "stagnation" era. Gave me to read the political officer and the special officer. then he asked the question: "Why are these books under an unofficial ban?" Zampolit: "Slander against the Soviet system", Osobist: "The truth about the thoughts of England." Another confirmation that the KGB did not hold fools.
  12. +3
    2 May 2015 20: 13
    Turns out Orwell deserves a read
    1. +1
      2 May 2015 21: 17
      It is possible that his sympathies have always been with the Communists.
      1. 0
        4 May 2015 10: 36
        Quote: NordUral
        It is possible that his sympathies have always been with the Communists.

        "The first such collision with reality was the Russian revolution. For rather complicated reasons, almost all the English left had to accept the system it established as" socialist ", realizing that both its principles and practice are completely alien to everything that is meant by “Socialism” in our own country. ”And as a result, we developed some kind of inverted thinking, which admits that words such as“ democracy ”have two mutually exclusive meanings, and such actions as mass arrests or forced evictions turn out to be the same being both right and wrong. "
        George Orwell. essay "Writers and Leviathan"
  13. +3
    2 May 2015 21: 08
    In my opinion, what difference does anyone mean Orwell. Another time and thoughts about your own. Another thing is that now these books describe the West, led by the United States.
  14. +1
    2 May 2015 22: 10
    "Animal Farm" is a book about the degradation of elites in general. What's the difference what. Each reader will see his own. Either the snickering party leaders of the late Soviet Union, or the over-the-top bureaucrats, deputies and other bourgeoisie, who were over the top and crazy with impunity.
  15. 0
    2 May 2015 22: 11
    The fish rots from the head, and from Europe only the tail remains. recourse
  16. 0
    3 May 2015 00: 17
    I will express my opinion,
    I do not advise anyone to read 1984, and even repeatedly! The author’s way of thinking over the years and with the help of readers has literally made this utopia a reality !!!
    This is not the author's merit, as many believe, it is the personal contribution of everyone who has joined the "work", who tuned his brain to this paranoia, everyone who believed in the inevitability of just such a scenario development.

    By the way, Oruel wrote essentially a remake of Evgeny Zamyatin with his novel "WE"
    The phenomenon of collective embodiment is also present in Turgenev's eponymous "Turgenev Ladies", there are opinions that the author idealized the description of Russian girls in his works, and as a result they were embodied in reality precisely through collective reading ...

    Regarding 1984, the novel is really hard and inevitable, it is a spiritual thriller that leaves no hope!
    It's funny that we have recently even had Pobeda chocolate, quite lousy I must say, those who have tried are sure to agree!
    Bitter chocolate, the taste of Victory, as if it was the bitterness of awareness of the loss of history on the eve of the anniversary of the 70 anniversary, with the attacks of former allies and siblings, terrifying duality and inconsistency of reality, in the spirit of the antipodes, white and black ...
  17. -1
    3 May 2015 00: 32
    Europe about Ukraine and Europe about yourself
    these are different things - doublethinking.
  18. +1
    3 May 2015 03: 09
    Quote: voyaka uh
    Orwell began as a communist, came to help the communists in
    Spain during the civil war. But there in a cruel way
    disillusioned with the communists. And "Animal's Farm" (highly recommend!),
    and 1984 are clearly written about the Stalinist regime, as it were, transferred to England.
    To refer to Orwell as an anti-European romance is purely 1984 laughing


    This is when the Stalinist regime waged wars for the sake of war interesting? And there is no need here about "millions who perished in the GULAG", "animals in blue caps" and other crap written by a bald envious man in a shirt and later by all sorts of deserters like a rezun (with a small letter) and liberal pseudo-historians! Paid by the way from a Jewish wallet.
  19. +1
    3 May 2015 11: 18
    I immediately gave the author of the article a "plus". For at least one of this phrase, precise and capacious:

    "War and hunger help keep people stupefied by poverty in a world of illusion."

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"