The Perspective of Tough Russian-American Confrontation in Armenia ("Zhamanak", Armenia)

11
The Perspective of Tough Russian-American Confrontation in Armenia ("Zhamanak", Armenia)

The candidacy of the new US ambassador to Armenia has, in fact, been approved, and it can already be said that John Heffern is replacing Marie Yovanovitch. The candidacy of the ambassador was unanimously approved by the Senate Foreign Relations Commission. Thus, the United States quickly resolved the issue of its ambassador to Armenia, and, moreover, decided with a rather curious approach.

The fact is that John Heffern will arrive in Armenia, so to speak, straight from Brussels. Of course, not in the literal sense. Simply, John Heffern to Yerevan is transferred from the post of the head of the US NATO mission. This circumstance suggests that the United States envisages the implementation of a rather tough diplomatic activity in Armenia, once they send a diplomat from the military-political bloc to our country. And this trend becomes extremely understandable against the background of another trend that we have recently observed - the revitalization of the CSTO.

This military-political bloc has recently, through Russia's efforts, been actively trying to develop such mechanisms that will give organizations legal rights to intervene in the internal affairs of the CSTO member countries. At the moment, Russia is actively searching, and has even announced its intention to control the situation in the social networks of the CSTO member countries, including in Armenia. Thus, the emergence of the need for tough diplomatic opposition, which the United States seems to be preparing, becomes apparent.

There is no doubt that this competition will especially intensify during the election period in Armenia, and Russia will undoubtedly try to use these processes in favor of realizing the intentions that it is currently trying to legally consolidate in the framework of the CSTO. This means that in order to contain Russia, the United States will also have to actively intervene in electoral and electoral processes in Armenia. Probably because of this, unlike the 2007 - 2008 pre-election processes, when the United States was not represented in Armenia at the ambassadorial level, this time the United States decided in advance on the appointment of the ambassador, and in the upcoming elections they would declare their position already at the highest diplomatic level.

In other words, a relatively quick decision on the appointment of an ambassador to Armenia indicates a hot Russian-American competition that will unfold in our country in the near future. In principle, this, of course, is not bad when in a certain country superpowers compete with each other, and this competition is not in the nature of military, but in diplomatic battles. Here, it is already important how far the local political field of the given country is prepared for these battles.
11 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. svvaulsh
    +3
    6 October 2011 12: 09
    I dare to suggest a scenario: elections - opposition indignation - color revolution - abandonment of the RF military base - introduction of peacekeepers under the auspices of the Americans to prevent a repeat of "Karabakh" - the US base. And then, depending on the situation, either the south (Iran) or the north (RF).
  2. Volkhov
    0
    6 October 2011 16: 34
    An oil refinery has been built on the border between Armenia and Iran, from which the Persians hope to receive fuel when their plants burn out. Quiet American will try to close this opportunity, but rather the entire border.
  3. -2
    6 October 2011 16: 38
    It is a valid version, svvaulsh! And quite feasible. Armenians are not a reliable ally.
    1. +3
      6 October 2011 18: 03
      esaul,
      And at the moment they are a reliable ally. Here you are wrong in their position, they will keep everything for Russia what they need, no one else will help them. Azerbaijan, Turkey and the United States will crush them too, so they are trying to come to an agreement with us.
      1. Ivan35
        +2
        6 October 2011 19: 04
        I agree with Esso - the Armenians have nowhere to go - the Azeri Turks and the pendoses behind them are their natural enemies - the Armenians have been and will be members of the CSTO, and if the problem with Karabakh is resolved, then they are the first candidates for joining the Union of Belarus of Kazakhstan and Russia
    2. +1
      6 October 2011 19: 20
      Quote: esaul
      Armenians are not a reliable ally.

      This is an ally by the will of circumstances, they simply cannot get out of the Karabakh issue themselves! But if the Armenians had the opportunity, they would hardly have chosen Russia as their allies!
      1. -1
        6 October 2011 19: 53
        In! Already printed, and then saw the APASUS comm! In tune! Salute, brother!
  4. -3
    6 October 2011 19: 12
    Guys, glad to be wrong.
    1. sirToad
      -1
      6 October 2011 19: 27
      if you remember, back in 1990, the Turks hinted to the Armenians that they would not tolerate any independent Armenia. Armenians can reorient to pendos but in case of reinforced concrete guarantees from them. In the meantime, a relatively short time in Azerbaijan, 40 km from the border with Iran, amers (warriors) reconstructed the Soviet-era airport - now there is a 3-kilometer strip and reinforced concrete caponiers there for some reason. reliable information - a classmate told me about this. so most likely pendosy on the opposite side.
  5. -3
    6 October 2011 19: 49
    The fact of the matter is that a fearful ally cannot be a real ally, like-minded person. An example is our "faithful" Georgia! The thinking of the leaders of today's Armenia has undergone significant changes under the influence of such two factors as money and a hypertrophied, distorted sense of national identity. Much evidence of this, but most clearly manifested itself in the rewarding of Saakashvili with the state award of Armenia (Russia is not a decree for us, we ourselves have a mustache!) After the events of 080808 (!) And bragging to the Americans with the S-300 systems (we are so formidable without Moscow!) ... Such an ally cannot even be called a vassal because the vassals (not all, but most) understood the sense of duty.
    1. sirToad
      -1
      7 October 2011 04: 59
      if you recall the opinion of Tacitus about the Armenians as a people - they can even be accused of inciting ethnic hatred. he has several pages devoted to the Armenians. in short, this is the opinion - because of their geographical position and character, the Armenians cannot be either worthy allies or loyal vassals, they are capable of only minor intrigues, and even with the slightest pressure they immediately run over to the stronger side
  6. -3
    8 October 2011 09: 38
    Sir, you flatter me ... winked