In the French province opened a monument to the Russian Expeditionary Force

26
In the city of Kursi (department of the Marne) on Sunday, a monument to the Russian Expeditionary Corps, which fought in France during the First World War, was opened, the newspaper reported Look with reference to tass.

In the French province opened a monument to the Russian Expeditionary Force


Vladimir Medinsky, the head of the Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation, said at the opening ceremony: “Russia and France are united by a special bond - the two countries were allies in the two most terrible military conflicts in stories of our civilization - the First and Second World Wars. "

Speaking about the participation of Russian soldiers in the battles "on the Western Front of the First World War on the side of the French Army," the minister drew a parallel with the history of the famous Normandie-Neman air regiment formed by French soldiers in the Soviet Union during the Second World War.

“Many French officers, having left occupied France for England, could simply wait for the conscription, the opening of the second front, the unification of the Resistance forces by General de Gaulle,” noted Medinsky. “But the heart of the French officer did not bring this down.” They took the risk of traveling across Europe to the Soviet Union and volunteered to join the Soviet army. ”

In the same way, the minister continued, “Russian soldiers and officers in 1916-17 went to an outstanding feat, standing shoulder to shoulder with the French brothers arms and went to the end in the fight against the common enemy. "

“When the king was overthrown in 1917, all the soldiers were released from the oath and could return to their families,” he said. - However, most of them no longer shared in the heart of Russia and France, and they remained to fight. These were extraordinary people, made of steel, with a huge heart and a special idea of ​​honor. We all need to take an example from them. ”

Mayor Kursi Martin Jolly, in turn, noted that this day will be a memorable date for local residents in the history of their city.

“This is a big day for our entire commune, the completion of a project started with the support of the Russian embassy in 2012 year,” said the head of the city hall. “It is a great honor for us that the choice fell on our city, and now we have witnessed an important event that points all of us to the duty of memory that we must convey to our descendants.”

The monument is a bronze sculpture of a Russian soldier holding a French girl in his arms. The author of the monumental composition is the sculptor Alexander Taratynov.

In France, this is the 2 th monument to the Russian Expeditionary Force. The first is open at 2011 in Paris.

The newspaper reminds that in 1916 Russia sent to Europe to help allies in the First World War an expeditionary force numbering about 45 thousands of soldiers and officers. The older generation of French never forgot how Russian troops in the battle of Reims stopped the advance of the German divisions and in the 12 hours of battle they fought back at least 5 attacks. The corps also played an important role in offensive operations deployed in the Champagne-Ardenne region in the spring of 1917.
26 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +15
    April 27 2015 10: 34
    Such news warms the soul. Not all of Europe is bored. In general, the history of the expeditionary force is worthy not only of mention, but also of basic research. The fate of those who supported the revolution in Russia and refused to fight is especially tragic. They were accused of desertion and shot. Such times were ...
    1. +2
      April 27 2015 10: 38
      A hundred years have passed, look at our Ukrainian brothers. Hundreds of thousands are called up for slaughter, and those who refuse are caught like hares and planted.
      History does not teach anything unless history is taught.
    2. jjj
      +3
      April 27 2015 10: 38
      Thank God.
    3. +4
      April 27 2015 10: 39
      The Russian troops showed themselves worthy in battle, but the victory was stolen from the Russian Empire, the revolution of 1917 of the year. And then historical silence in Soviet times. And what is due is wonderful.
    4. +10
      April 27 2015 10: 40
      That's right, only about the participation of the French in the Second World War, so it is limited to the regiment "Normandie-Niemen"! We can recall the truth that in 1941 the Germans fought on the Borodino field as part of the Wehrmacht, though unsuccessfully ... they were defeated in the first attack! You can remember the French and the fact that in 1945 the Reichstag was defended by the SS division, which consisted mainly of the French! It was not for nothing that when signing the surrender, the German general, seeing the French delegation, said: and this we also lost ...?!
      1. -1
        April 27 2015 13: 48
        Quote: Varyag_1973
        that in 1941 Germans fought on the Borodino field as part of the Wehrmachtreally bad ...

        probably meant the French? Do not repeat this myth - there were no French at Borodino in 1941. Blumentritt wrote garbage, and there was no appeal to Kluge "to the French at Borodino", shown in Ozerov's "Battle for Moscow". We are carried away by symbolism.
    5. The comment was deleted.
    6. +9
      April 27 2015 10: 44
      The French do not disdain Russian history. 2010, a monument to Lenin was unveiled in Montpellier. And nobody "lustrates" anyone hi
    7. +3
      April 27 2015 11: 51
      It is not necessary to turn a blind eye to other pages of history that for some reason were hushed up, we are all Russian people, wherever we are.
  2. +1
    April 27 2015 10: 39
    The memory of millions of Russian people who died in the massacre of world wars must be preserved as a reminder of the meaninglessness and cruelty of the war for ordinary people.

    In general, I regret that thousands of Russian soldiers were sent to a foreign land (FRANCE) to die for the interests of others .... NIKOLASHAKU could have been shot for this alone .... thousands and thousands of Russian women became widows, children were left without fathers, and for what? .... to save the bourgeoisie in France who actually do not care about the Russian people.
    1. -7
      April 27 2015 11: 26
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      In general, I regret that thousands of Russian soldiers were sent to a foreign land (FRANCE) to die for the interests of others ....


      Victim of Soviet propaganda.
      These flawed scoops wanted Russia to lose, and wrote letters to enemies, such as Japan, in which they wished them victory over the Russian army. In this, the vile scoops are no different from their followers - white-hawkers and liberals, they are also very happy about all the troubles of Russia and the Russian people and wish good luck to the enemies.

      And then they slandered the memory of the fallen, saying that they fought for "the imperial ambitions of the imperialists." Pigs.

      Russian soldiers fought in the Great War for Russia.
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      thousands and thousands of Russian women became widows, children were left without fathers, and for what? .... to save the bourgeois in France who generally do not care about the Russian people.


      And for what, in the Second World War, did they take Berlin, Koenigsberg, Prague and a number of other European cities? it was necessary to reach the borders of the Kursk and Belgorod regions, and then it was not our business, it was necessary to leave everything to the Germans and Ukrainians, let them figure it out. What did millions of people put down for? For "imperial ambitions"? - train of thought of the white-grass scoop.
      1. +3
        April 27 2015 11: 43
        Tor Hummer (please without insults ... then write in a personal and I will answer you from the heart)

        Deftly you mixed all one heap .... following similar logic, you need to go the whole world to liberate following any ideology .... and help all kinds of adventurers
        let's still separate the flies from the cutlets.
        1. 0
          April 27 2015 11: 49
          For the same LEKHA. Here, horses are mixed in a bunch, people ...! What's in a person’s head ?! Congratulations on the victory of the Japanese emperor, representatives of lousy intelligentsia, what have the scoops ?!

          Along the way, a man from the Ruin, there have been some kind of metamorphoses with brains lately!
        2. -1
          April 27 2015 12: 06
          Quote: The same LYOKHA
          Deftly you mixed all one heap .... following similar logic, you need to go the whole world to liberate following any ideology .... and help all kinds of adventurers
          let's still separate the flies from the cutlets.


          Scoop with a flat mind, at the level of the plinth, it is difficult to realize that the interests of a state like the Russian Empire extend far beyond its own borders.
          Exactly like the interests of the USSR extended far beyond its borders, that is why the USSR rendered enormous financial, military and material assistance to all kinds of "adventurers".

          In exactly the same way, Russia's interests extend far beyond the borders of Russia, moreover, Russia's interests extend to the whole world. As they said under the Empire: "Without the knowledge of the Russian Tsar, not a single gun in Europe fires." And that is why Russia interferes, intervened and will interfere in all processes taking place in all corners of the world, be it Syria, Georgia, Ukraine, Pridnestrovie or any other country.

          The interests of the state go far beyond the borders of the state itself, and to defend these interests it is often necessary to fight, far from the homeland, even in France, even in the sands of Afghanistan, even in the steppes of the Donbass! And it always has been, and the First World War is no exception!

          And don’t dare, I understand, don’t dare, say that the Russian soldiers who fought for the Russian Empire fought in vain!
          They fought for the geopolitical interests of the Russian State, and they are heroes!
          1. MrK
            0
            April 27 2015 12: 43
            What a nationalist, Tor Hummer, who loves Russia. Where are we scoops and our grandfathers who defeated Hitler.

            In the fourteenth year, the Russian armies threw into a mess completely consciously. Those who represent Russia as an innocent victim of either fatal circumstances or German aggression are cunning, or are not familiar with the true state of affairs. And the true state of affairs was such that in Russia there was an influential group of hawks in uniform and without uniforms.
            These Russian hawks were sleeping and dreaming of the Bosphorus and Dardanelles in Russian hands. The real benefit of this would be one single group - Russian grain merchants, who would be able to freely export wheat through the designated straits. And this audience, whatever one may say, cannot be considered the personification of all of Russia. In addition, their confidence is surprising that the Anglo-Saxons, accustomed to raking in the heat of others, would give Russia the straits. By making her an ocean power? Having an even more powerful economic competitor? Yes, they would have choked earlier.
            1. 0
              April 27 2015 13: 23
              Quote: mrark
              In the fourteenth year, the Russian armies threw into a mess completely consciously. Those who represent Russia as an innocent victim of either fatal circumstances or German aggression are cunning, or are not familiar with the true state of affairs. And the true state of affairs was such that in Russia there was an influential group of hawks in uniform and without uniforms.
              These Russian hawks were sleeping and dreaming of the Bosphorus and Dardanelles in Russian hands. The real benefit of this would be one single group - Russian grain traders who would receive the ability to freely export wheat through the designated straits


              Exactly the same nonsense can be moaning about the capture of Crimea in 2014, like - what other interests of the state are there? "hawks" just needed ports to trade "better".
              Thus, any war can be vulgarized, such as - and what did they fight for? that someone threatened the people and the country? And call those who fought "the chain dogs of tsarism / imperialism / regime."

              You can go further: Why did they fight Hitler? What was difficult to capitulate peacefully and live in peace ?! How many lives have been put because of this stupid feud between the Gulag and Buchenwald! Now we would drink Bavarian beer! The Germans are brothers!
              etc.

              The man who says that the warriors of the First World War, fought for no reason, for the interests of "rotten tsarism", is exactly the same degenerate as the one who says that the warriors of the Second World War fought for the interests of "Soviet imperialism."
            2. 0
              April 27 2015 15: 44
              Quote: mrark
              These Russian hawks were sleeping and dreaming of the Bosphorus and Dardanelles in Russian hands.

              and all? Something primitive hawks of some kind.
      2. +1
        April 27 2015 14: 39
        I hate the word "scoop". In my opinion, this is the favorite word of the Belogandonniks and liberals (if in your words). And also recently all Svidomo. For some reason it seems to me that you belong to the latter. Judging by the anger permeating your comments.
  3. BAT
    +2
    April 27 2015 10: 41
    Maybe, in Europe, not everything is lost? Maybe she will ever be reborn? I would like to believe that in Europe there are a lot of normal, adequate and honest people. I would like them to be the majority.
  4. +2
    April 27 2015 10: 44
    So, the process has begun. The stronger Russia becomes, the more they will recognize its merits in the world and reckon with it.
  5. +4
    April 27 2015 10: 46
    It’s interesting, but no one wants to erect a life-size monument to the Mistrals as a sign of business cooperation between the two states in France?
  6. +3
    April 27 2015 10: 46
    France erects monuments, and dill once "the bride" destroyed everything, renounced everything !!! Shame!! dill
  7. +3
    April 27 2015 10: 51
    The event is good. The presidents leave (Oland), and the French should have a memory of Russian help.
  8. +3
    April 27 2015 10: 54
    Stupid heart don't beat
    Thoughts of speed (bn) in unison.
    There in France near Reims,
    The city of Murmelon is hidden.

    Where for honor, not for reward
    (Slander for a century leave behind)
    Russian brigades fought
    For the province of Champagne.

    And in (19) the 16th, damned,
    And along the Way of the Cross,
    Soldiers were coming from Russia,
    To save France.

    And to Europe to delight,
    Amazing: in a bayonet ...
    Russian brigades fought
    To cover for Paris.

    Everything is casual and simple:
    The rumble of war has long ceased.
    Only a chapel above the graveyard
    Where is the glorious infantry regiment.

    All the shells died
    The soldier took the land
    Russian brigades fought
    For the French fields.

    Time pacifies memory
    Thank God that we live.
    Broad country native ...
    Where to mention everything? !!

    We don’t cut veins from frustration,
    Do not fill the melancholy in wine
    That tech brigades are forgotten
    In a forgotten war.

    Just something aching, pulling,
    Keeps you awake
    To the golden fields of Champagne
    The lot fell out - that’s the way!

    Where is the soul of the Legionnaire
    Will not ring like a string
    What's in the graves of Saint Toledo
    Our Russian war.

    Stupid heart don't beat
    Thoughts of speed (bn) in unison.
    There in France near Reims,
    The city of Murmelon is hidden.

    Where for honor, not for reward
    (Slander for a century leave behind)
    Russian brigades fought
    For the province of Champagne.
    → http://pesenok.ru/11/Leonidov-Viktor/tekst-pesni-Russkie-brigady
  9. +1
    April 27 2015 10: 59
    Robbed Russia for billions, and a wide gesture with a monument. Net profit million%. And the second question, why did it come almost a century later?
  10. +1
    April 27 2015 11: 21
    Quote: fomkin
    And the second question, why did it come almost a century later?

    Read V. Pikul's "Out of the Dead End". It tells how the French acted with the Russian soldiers. And then "hurray! Hurray!" ...
  11. exalex
    -2
    April 27 2015 11: 25
    Nice .. So they remember, and moreover Remember .. "bistro" has not been forgotten yet.? After all, not only then, but even now, no one canceled "Vodka, quickly." .Yukrein, there is clearly no help (uh) nickname .. They are on the "front line", in the fight .. True, they could not decide with whom. , and you .. Why not democracy ??
  12. -2
    April 27 2015 11: 27
    Quote: revnagan
    Read V. Pikul "Out of the Dead End". It tells HOW the French did with the Russian soldiers. And then "Hurray! Hurray!"


    Yes, that PIKULA ... enough to get acquainted with the facts of what happened to our soldiers who survived in FRANCE.

    This is a tragedy for them and from this tragedy they make some kind of farce.
  13. +2
    April 27 2015 11: 31
    "The monument is a bronze sculpture of a Russian soldier holding a French girl in his arms. The author of the monumental composition is sculptor Alexander Taratynov" ...

    Against the background of the fact that all of Europe is trying to replay the history of the Second World War, it was completely unexpected (for me personally) that adequate French had a memory, the memory of the fact that Russian soldiers died for them even during the time of the first MV ... Moreover, absolutely not defending their homeland, and defending the lives of the Entente soldiers ...
    Naglia, where are you with your memory, ay ??? !!!
  14. 0
    April 27 2015 11: 42
    “Many French officers, having left occupied France for England, could simply wait for the conscription, the opening of the second front, the unification of the Resistance forces by General de Gaulle,” noted Medinsky. “But the heart of the French officer did not bring this down.” They took the risk of traveling across Europe to the Soviet Union and volunteered to join the Soviet army. ”
    Well, how many such officers were there? less than a hundred. well, another ten thousand went to De Gaulle in the "Fighting France", and the rest preferred to sit on the priest level and wait until they were released. Why respect such allies?
  15. -1
    April 27 2015 11: 48
    The heroization of the PMR to the detriment of the Patriotic war is a global strategy, and Russia supports this, it also wants to be closer to democratic values. For the Soviets, this massacre is meaningful and criminal, provoked by the Angles to destroy the Russian Empire and Germany, monuments must be erected, but the meaning of these monuments should be the sorrow of meaninglessness .
    1. +1
      April 27 2015 12: 02
      Quote: apro
      Heroization of the PMR

      why not? What, soviet reflections interfere - did not remember that war for 70 years and x ... with it?
      Quote: apro
      apparently also wants to be closer to democratic values.

      if these values ​​imply a tribute to our compatriots who died in that war, then I share them.
      Quote: apro
      For the Soviet, this massacre is meaningful and criminal, provoked by the Angles to destroy the Russian Empire and Germany

      for the soviet? may be. And for the Russians? Such capitulant demagogy partly led to the collapse of the Empire, according to which we arrange together in tears.
      1. 0
        April 27 2015 12: 21
        for the soviet? may be. And for the Russians? Such capitulant demagogy partly led to the collapse of the Empire, according to which we arrange together in tears.
        For the Russians, the PMR, in any case, should have ended in defeat, it wasn’t for the Russians to win, the straits would have fallen in love with Russia, it would not have brought the empire to collapse. Soviet yes ....
        1. MrK
          0
          April 27 2015 12: 58
          I will add. Remember the heroism of the Russian soldiers and officers who died in World War I. For me, the scoop is sacred. But you need to remember the vile and treacherous role of the ilk of tsarist Russia, which got involved in this war. Without thinking about the people.

          Denikin further: "The industry of Russia did not provide the tsarist army with the necessary number of rifles. The number of rifles produced in 1915 at domestic factories covered the needs of the army by slightly more than 50%." , up to Mexico and Japan, a variety of samples, each with its own cartridges that did not fit the others ...

          There was even a proposal, due to the lack of rifles ... to equip the soldiers with "axes on long poles."

          Russian soldiers had to go on the attack with medieval halberds - while in other European armies, not only light and convenient light machine guns and machine guns appeared en masse, but also combat aircraft of all kinds, tanks, armored cars, walkie-talkies, excavators for digging trenches, tractors " ...

          Secret reports of the police and security departments are silent about any “revolutionary agitation” and “intrigues of the Bolsheviks”, as well as no mention of the notorious “German gold”. Other wording: about "observable everywhere and in all segments of the population, as if tired of war and the thirst for a speedy peace, it doesn’t matter on what terms it was concluded". Here lies the reason: the country is tired of the war, which, moreover, frankly did not understand. The chatter about the straits and the Russian flag over Istanbul did not somehow reach the majority of people and did not touch them at all. There was no idea.
          [The book "Cursed Soviet. Power ... in prose. Ru]
    2. MrK
      0
      April 27 2015 12: 52
      PMV- war is not domestic, but predatory. Objectives correctly indicated apro.
      There are no victims in the First World War - only the culprits - including Russian generals led by the mediocre “autocrat”. Russia rushed into the Great War, being completely unprepared for it.
      It makes sense to invite General Denikin as a witness: “The situation of the Russian army and navy after the Japanese war, which had depleted material resources, and discovered flaws in organization, training and management, was truly threatening. According to the recognition of military authorities, the army generally remained helpless in the full sense of the word until 1910.
      Only in the very last years before the war (1910-1914) did the work on the restoration and reorganization of the Russian armed forces raise them significantly, but in technical and material terms it was completely insufficient. The law on the construction of the fleet passed only in 1912 (before that, the grand dukes stubbornly plundered huge money from fleet sums.).
      The so-called “Big Program”, which was supposed to significantly strengthen the army, was approved only in March 1914. So nothing significant could be done from this program: the corps went to war, having from 102 to 110 guns against the German 160 and almost none having heavy artillery and a supply of rifles. "

      There wasn’t enough artillery due to the venality of the other great princes that we mentioned.
      There weren’t enough shells - in many memoirs of the times of the First World War this dreary horror is described when the Teuton bombards our positions with a shower of shells, mowing companies and battalions, and we have a couple of shells on the gun.
      There weren’t enough machine guns - because the Russian military theorist General Dragomirov was their categorical adversary, believing that such a squandering of cartridges was useless, a heroic Russian soldier with a gun from the time of the Russian-Turkish war would defeat all the adversaries and so overcome the butt and bayonet-well done. And the Germans by that time machine guns began to arrive in the troops.
      1. 0
        April 27 2015 13: 34
        Why are these excursions? Everyone has heard and knows about the famine of rifles, everyone flashed their tactical stupidity in that war, not only the Russian General Staff. The point is that the memory of the fallen should not be held hostage to the conjuncture, political or historical. At military graves it is customary to keep silent, and not to rant about the "right" and "wrong" war. This is cynicism, you know.
  16. ed65b
    0
    April 27 2015 11: 59
    The Germans kept the city from the French for two years, the Russians knocked them out in three days.
  17. 0
    April 27 2015 12: 08
    Yes, yes, yes, and then the French stabbed in the back and occupied part of our territory — damn allies.
    1. 0
      April 27 2015 12: 12
      Quote: classik46
      and then the French hit in the back

      to whom hit? Did the Council of People's Commissars and the Entente have something in common?
  18. +1
    April 27 2015 12: 21
    Quote: Varyag_1973
    That's right, only about the participation of the French in the Second World War, so it is limited to the regiment "Normandie-Niemen"! We can recall the truth that in 1941 the Germans fought on the Borodino field as part of the Wehrmacht, though unsuccessfully ... they were defeated in the first attack! You can remember the French and the fact that in 1945 the Reichstag was defended by the SS division, which consisted mainly of the French! It was not for nothing that when signing the surrender, the German general, seeing the French delegation, said: and this we also lost ...?!


    Well, why, they took part in the 2 world. They had partisans (poppies) and Free France de Gaulle fought along with the Western allies. And the Leclerc armored division took part in the liberation of Paris.
    1. 0
      April 27 2015 12: 30
      True loss of those who fought with the Germans and against them one to one.
    2. MrK
      0
      April 27 2015 13: 05
      mamont5. How can this be correlated with 34 million of Soviet soldiers who passed the Second World War and broke the neck of Nazi Germany. After all, it was not Hitler who fought against us. All Europe united by Hitler fought against the USSR.
  19. 0
    April 27 2015 12: 55
    Quote: wasjasibirjac
    Well, how many such officers were there? less than a hundred. well, another ten thousand went to De Gaulle in the "Fighting France", and the rest preferred to sit on the priest level and wait until they were released. Why respect such allies?

    No matter how much, the main thing is that they exist, and they are the guardians of the traditions of alliance, valor, honor, and most importantly, MEMORY!