Voronezh Aircraft Building Society OJSC is testing the next An-148 for the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation

29
23 on April 2015 of the Voronezh Aircraft Building Company OJSC began flight tests of the passenger An-148-100Е, built for the RF Ministry of Defense, reports blog Center for Analysis of Strategies and Technologies.



This is the sixth aircraft that was built under the state contract for the supply of X-NUMX An-15-148 aircraft with a total value of 100 billion rubles, which was signed by 18,43799 on May 7 of the year. According to the agreement, the RF Ministry of Defense was to receive one aircraft in the 2013 year, in the 2013 and 2014 years - four each, and in the 2015 and 2016 years - three An-2017.

“Soaring 23 on April 2015, the 43-04 board became the 25 mAnO 148 aircraft built by VASO, and the first aircraft of this type to take off in Voronezh in 2015. He also became the 35 aircraft of the An-148 / An-158 family as a whole (including ten units built in Ukraine), ”the article notes.
29 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. avt
    +19
    April 24 2015 11: 23
    good The machine is de jure and practically de facto Russian - the rights have been redeemed, everything can be done in Russia, it seems that even Antonov was crying that there was no order for new sets of wings from VASO.
    1. +4
      April 24 2015 11: 29
      Another An-148 for the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
      I don’t understand
      Seven months were not enough for An-148 aircraft to mark the five-year anniversary of the St. Petersburg airline Rossiya. Russian-Ukrainian aircraft appeared in its fleet in November 2009, and on April 9, 2015, it became known that all aircraft of this type were being withdrawn from Russia.
      http://www.fontanka.ru/2015/04/09/184/
      1. FID
        +4
        April 24 2015 11: 39
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Seven months were not enough for An-148 aircraft to celebrate its fifth anniversary

        Yes, this is how Savelyev runs Aeroflot, and Rossiya Airlines is a subsidiary of Aeroflot ...
      2. +6
        April 24 2015 11: 40
        An-148-100Е
        A variant of the aircraft with a passenger capacity of 70 – 85 people, with a flight range of up to 4400 km.
      3. +2
        April 24 2015 11: 57
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        I don’t understand

        And what is not clear here ... What is the ability to QUICKLY put into operation, then we put it. Painfully our planes "worn out", it was high time to replace them. And "An", "Il" or "Tu" does not matter anymore. The main thing is that it is produced on the territory of Russia ... so far, I hope that soon everything will change.
    2. FID
      +4
      April 24 2015 11: 36
      That's right ... But ... the 9 remaining planes are likely to become extreme. Ukraine, I believe, will not do any more, or they will install a new control system and re-certify the machine.
      1. jjj
        +1
        April 24 2015 11: 46
        The salon is comfortable. Only the noise from the engines is more noticeable and when landing, the load on the chassis is transmitted to the passenger compartment more than in cars with racks in planes. And one of the "Russia" cars once lost control in flight
        1. FID
          +3
          April 24 2015 11: 53
          Quote: jjj
          And one of the "Russia" cars once lost control in flight

          Management is a self-sufficient thing. 4x redundant steering wheel control, 2x automatic path control plus mechanical wiring. This is not a French 2-fold redundant system "fly by wire" (fly by wire - free translation) ...
          1. jjj
            0
            April 24 2015 17: 58
            A few minutes the car flew by itself
            1. FID
              0
              April 25 2015 07: 52
              Quote: jjj
              A few minutes the car flew by itself

              When a car flies by itself, it means that it crashes, I apologize ...
  2. The comment was deleted.
  3. +7
    April 24 2015 11: 25
    Oh, tears ... It’s time to revive the aviation industry of Russia, it's high time. A plane is good, it would have been his elder brother to produce with us, if there had been a competitor to IL, it would have pushed for improvement.
  4. +4
    April 24 2015 11: 25
    Not when I didn’t think what I would write, but ...
    - that the new plane is GOOD.
    - that the new aircraft of "An" firm is, alas, BAD ...
    We want, we don't want to, but we advertise this company. When will the "Ilyushins", different modifications go into the series?
    1. +4
      April 24 2015 11: 30
      Quote: svp67
      - that the new plane is GOOD.
      - that the new aircraft of "An" firm is, alas, BAD ...

      -------------------------
      The fact that he was made in Russia is VERY GOOD ...
      1. +1
        April 24 2015 11: 33
        Quote: Altona
        The fact that he was made in Russia is VERY GOOD ...

        Who argues. Worse is the fact that design support should be carried out in Ukraine. You see, any change - only with their permission. But will they give it? I doubt it
        1. FID
          +2
          April 24 2015 11: 42
          Quote: svp67
          But will they give it? I doubt it

          I can absolutely officially say - DO NOT GIVE.
        2. +1
          April 24 2015 11: 57
          Quote: svp67
          Who argues. Worse is the fact that design support should be carried out in Ukraine. You see, any change - only with their permission. But will they give it? I doubt it

          ------------------------
          This is understandable, but where to go? It is necessary to restore your engineering and your competencies ...
          1. 0
            April 24 2015 12: 25
            Quote: Altona
            This is understandable, but where to go?

            The most interesting thing is that everyone knows the answer ...
            Quote: Altona
            It is necessary to restore your engineering and your competencies ...
      2. +1
        April 24 2015 12: 38
        Quote: Altona
        Quote: svp67
        - that the new plane is GOOD.
        - that the new aircraft of "An" firm is, alas, BAD ...

        -------------------------
        The fact that he was made in Russia is VERY GOOD ...

        In the world of NA, few people know about Russia about hohland smile
        1. +1
          April 24 2015 12: 42
          Quote: niki233
          In the world of NA, few people know about hohland

          Bye. Yes.
    2. +1
      April 24 2015 11: 32
      Quote: svp67
      - that the new aircraft of "An" firm is, alas, BAD ...
      We want, we don’t want, but we are advertising this company.

      And maybe over time, "Antonov" will be moved to Russia!what
      Why are they in Kiev Antonov Design Bureau. Let them Americans carry in Boeing.
      1. +2
        April 24 2015 11: 44
        Quote: Sid.74
        And maybe over time, "Antonov" will be moved to Russia!

        We are not in the USSR. It is very expensive. So that people, that is, FRAMES, is possible. But the Antonov brand itself, alas, will die in Ukraine.
      2. Mikhaylych
        +5
        April 24 2015 12: 30
        First of all, we need to learn to keep our own, the year of the 1990th sunset of the Union, 200 civil aircraft were produced. Where are the Tupolevs and Ilyushins? Let them be restored, destroyed under patriotic slogans, and now they are selling Jet's garbage. Restore gentlemen leaders, everything that you destroyed for the sake of friendship with the West, and take these hyper-expensive projects for yourself. When the British were offered to buy out the Superjet project, they shied away from it like the devil. Now SM-21 with an astronomical budget is still suitable, and then ordinary people buying tickets will pay for all these cuts out of their own pockets, since all this is included in the ticket price. In general, it would not hurt to conduct an investigation into the destruction of the aviation industry, in its power comparable to the US one. Only who will conduct it, the threads lead to the very top.
    3. +5
      April 24 2015 12: 26
      Oleg Konstantinovich Antonov (1906 - 1984) - Soviet aircraft designer, Doctor of Technical Sciences (1960), professor (1978).
      Born 25 January (7 February) 1906 years in the village of Trinity, Voronovo volost, Podolsky district, Moscow province (now part of the Trinity administrative district of Moscow).
      Since 1912, he lived in the city of Saratov. In 1915 — 1922 he studied at the Saratov real school (he graduated from the 2 class) and secondary school (now - secondary school No. 23).

      What's so bad? A truly Russian man with a Russian name and surname ... Well, he brought him by the decision of the Central Committee to Ukraine. So then, they clearly understood that Ukraine is the Central Russia ...
      1. +2
        April 24 2015 12: 43
        Quote: Aqela
        So then, they clearly understood that Ukraine is the Central Russia ...

        Then they understood that it was part of the USSR
      2. +2
        April 24 2015 20: 19
        Quote: Aqela
        Oleg Konstantinovich Antonov (1906 - 1984) - Soviet aircraft designer, Doctor of Technical Sciences (1960), professor (1978).
        Born 25 January (7 February) 1906 years in the village of Trinity, Voronovo volost, Podolsky district, Moscow province (now part of the Trinity administrative district of Moscow).
        Since 1912, he lived in the city of Saratov. In 1915 — 1922 he studied at the Saratov real school (he graduated from the 2 class) and secondary school (now - secondary school No. 23).

        What's so bad? A truly Russian man with a Russian name and surname ... Well, he brought him by the decision of the Central Committee to Ukraine. So then, they clearly understood that Ukraine is the Central Russia ...

        Guys, there is a great book, "Create Yourself" by the Saratov writer Vladimir Kazakov!
        About Oleg Konstantinovich, his life and work. Recommend...
  5. +4
    April 24 2015 11: 30
    Voronezh residents generally offered to take all the Antonov Design Bureau, I think now they regret that they did not agree. I’ve been to the factory, I know how they live. Even despite the squatting of Ukraine and the activities of Poghosyan, the plane was mastered.
  6. -3
    April 24 2015 11: 45
    Build everything you can, but not your Tu-334! Ukrainian An-148 - come on! Boeing SSJ - please! But I wonder who and how will serve these sides? Ukrainians? After exhaustion of the engines, what will we change engines for? Buy from Ukraine?
  7. +2
    April 24 2015 14: 11
    Quote: Alex_59
    After exhaustion of the engines, what will we change engines for? Buy from Ukraine?

    No need to make waves in the basin. The engines on the An-148 and Tu-334 are the same!
    They are made in the Russian Federation too. And in Ukraine, without Russian components, D-436 cannot be assembled ... An-148 is practically a Russian aircraft and not bad. Especially when operating at not very good airfields.
    The main problem, like all the civil aviation produced by us, is the small series, which makes cars and their service more expensive.
  8. +1
    April 24 2015 17: 33
    and yet, if Antonov falls apart, it will be a pity. to destroy such an enterprise ... such a name ... all childhood in the Far East - transportation from distant garrisons in Antonov's cars. "Well done" Ukrainians ...
    1. +1
      April 24 2015 20: 22
      I believe that the Antonov brand will return to Russia sooner or later! Will return with Kiev,
      or the trademark will be redeemed, but will come back! "Dolphins of the fifth ocean" (c) will be ours again!