The analytical program "However," with Mikhail Leontyev, October 04 2011

13


The fight against smoking is a socially useful thing. True, until it turns into a mockery of smokers. Until now, we have made it necessary to laugh at the paranoid forms that this struggle is acquiring in some particularly advanced countries. They giggled. From the depths of the Ministry of Health in a strange way jumped a bill that reproduces the most violent fantasies of the world tobacco-wrestlers community.

The draft law "On protection of public health from the effects of tobacco consumption", in addition to the classical measures to ban advertising and generally laying tobacco on the shelves, frightening pictures and signs, prohibiting tobacco workers from sponsoring any cultural and recreational activities, provides for a total ban on smoking on any transport, in hotels, institutions, bars, restaurants and nightclubs, including, by the way, hookahs, and even in entrances, unless with the documented consent of all homeowners there is a specially equipped isolated room. It also provides for a sharp increase in excise taxes and a ban on the sale of tobacco products in retail outlets with an area of ​​less than 50 square meters.

To begin with: a multiple increase in the price of tobacco can hardly be called a popular measure. The ban on trade in tobacco in the kiosks is a wild blow to the small retail business and absolutely arrogant lobbying of the interests of large retail chains. That immediately with the ears gives the motives of the authors. A sharp increase in excise taxes, especially in the conditions of the Customs Union, automatically leads to an increase in smuggling. By the way, for this very reason our Ministry of Finance has already refused quite recently from such an increase. Moreover, the scope and agility with which it is supposed to introduce all these total bans contradict the “national strategy” adopted by the Ministry of Health itself. There is even a suspicion that the Ministry of Health specialists have a weak relation to the authorship of this document, which someone Dmitry Yanin ascribes to himself - a well-known anti-tobacco social activist who exists for grants from the Bloomberg Foundation, the mayor of New York, famous for his active hatred for smokers.

The anti-smoking industry relies on the financial strength and interests of the largest pharmaceutical companies. In the USA, where lobbying costs are legal and fixed, the pharmacological industry is the largest lobbyist who spent over 12 over the years more than 2 billion dollars - twice as much as the entire fuel and energy complex. At the same time, the largest American anti-tobacco funds of Johnson, Gates and, especially, the Bloomberg Foundation direct their activities to developing countries, including Russia. In particular, the foundation, based on the measure of New York by Michael Bloomberg, plans to allocate 2013 millions of dollars for these purposes before 500.

Yes, for the money? It is strange that the shooting of smokers as stray dogs has not yet been declared. Some places from the project generally resemble notes from the "yellow house". For example, tobacco products not only cannot be put on the counter - the price list for them is provided to consumers, on their request, on separate counters, near which - at least 3 meters - there is no cash register equipment. But the idea to provide protection from tobacco smoke prisoners by the forces of GUINA is worth a lot!

Russia is a smoking country. We smoke 44 millions. These are living people. They also have rights. Many of them would be nice to help get rid of the bad habit, especially if they want it themselves. The project that confuses the fight against smoking with the fight against smokers has nothing to do with it. And an attempt to transplant Russia into a non-smoking carriage with one jerk is very much like a provocation.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

13 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    4 October 2011 12: 56
    Stop smoking! A healthy nation is a great country!
  2. Irina Konstantinova
    +4
    4 October 2011 14: 22
    We smoke 44 million. These are living people. They also have rights.

    Wow, but my rights have nothing to do with it? From the entrance, the smoke pulls into the apartment, you can not find fresh air on the street. We are all worried about smokers, but for some reason they’re not thinking about us - both poisoned and poisoned!
  3. ytqnhfk
    +2
    4 October 2011 14: 41
    I don’t smoke myself and look at this habit negatively! I don’t like it when everyone smokes poison with me and children! To buy death for my own money! My brother smokes but with a price increase he started talking about quitting !! So go right comrades! Do you want to poison yourself, let poison, but in special places! And for a lot of money!
  4. petor41
    +1
    4 October 2011 17: 43
    This is the first issue of the program with which I do not agree! Leontyev himself is lobbying for the interests of tobacco companies! It is necessary to fight against smoking by all possible means!
  5. zczczc
    +2
    4 October 2011 19: 01
    My 5 cents :)
    I myself am not a smoker, but I always had a normal attitude towards smokers, except those who smoke on the neighboring balcony and spoil the air. One of our employees smoked some fragrant tobaccos - so I went with him to the street to discuss various topics, including and smell the pleasant aroma. But this is not at home.

    I think we must fight smoking in the same way as we fought with domestic production - ridiculing it. After all, the production was laughed at? So smoking can be reduced to the level of "not fashionable", "not cool". I do not want to offend smokers at all.
    1. 0
      24 October 2012 16: 18
      zczczc,
      I, too, am not a smoker, although on vacation I can treat myself with a hookah or even a pipe but with tobacco. And I agree that real tobacco smells nice even. But firstly, everyone smokes cigarettes where there is no trace of tobacco, there is only chemistry-impregnated paper that also stinks. And secondly, the struggle is not with existing smokers, but first of all with smokers possible is a struggle for our future children, for a healthy nation.
  6. German
    0
    4 October 2011 19: 22
    mare! we have people both smoked and will smoke! something I have not met a single who would have been led on anti-tobacco propaganda! the more they prohibit, the more they will do the opposite!
  7. Script editor
    -1
    4 October 2011 20: 20
    Yes, guys, in fact, in this way they simply collect money from the population (excise taxes), a long-known fact.
    Yes, they will chat a little before the elections, pretend to take care of us. But it is also impossible to deny the usefulness of the slightest value. Many are accustomed to living to the detriment of their health and not believing in the future (there was no way to get away with this time), but the nation must survive, and for this it is necessary to change the stereotypes of behavior at least slightly. Adults let them smoke, they decide for themselves what to do and how. But a huge number of children also smoke, but this must be strictly fought against and the desire to be "cool and grown-up" be minimized.
    ps: I smoke it myself.
  8. Siberian
    -1
    4 October 2011 20: 46
    Leontyev is right when he says that "it is necessary to fight smoking, not smokers."
    1. 0
      24 October 2012 16: 12
      Siberian,
      Well, tell me, give concrete proposals on how to deal with human weaknesses and addictions while avoiding prohibitive measures.
  9. Aleksey42
    +1
    4 October 2011 21: 10
    I think that smoking should be fought. Moreover, the emphasis should be on children and youth. I doubt that 14-year-old glamorous girls will smoke samosad if they don’t have enough money for fashionable lady’s cigarettes. Of course, I need help to quit smoking. But the problem cannot be solved by prices alone; powerful propaganda is also needed. Both explicit and hidden. This is already a question for psychologists and marketers. The same (or approximately) can be directed against the drinking of youth. By the way, Leontiev and Gordon somehow in the Gordonquixote almost didn’t disagree, defending the rights of smokers to poison themselves and others.
  10. 0
    5 October 2011 13: 54
    It should not be forgotten that excise taxes on the sale of tobacco and alcohol (legally produced) go to state revenue. In Soviet times, the military power of the country and the economy as a whole rested on this money. I myself am a smoker and do not protect myself. Smoking is definitely a bad habit. But, as a smoker, I should not, as a citizen and taxpayer, be discriminated against. And then they will soon agree to the point that it is better to be a pederast than a smoker.
  11. 0
    24 October 2012 16: 06
    I doubt that this law will be passed in the form in which it is presented. But if it does pass, I can only say one thing: smoking rooms were added! Just the same with a mockery. And Leontyev Zhuchara, as a personal interest, upholds directly the fate of the world he decides. I’m not talking about smokers in general, but a large number of them simply do not give a damn to everyone around them and never think about those who this habit brings harm and displeasure to. And since they are also stubborn and stubborn in their habit, they don’t like to go to a place other than strict rules, nothing will help.
    But most importantly, I believe that we will see great benefit from these draconian measures (if everything doesn’t turn upside down) only after a generation, for those who smoke now are unlikely to be weaned, but younger children who do not receive this byak in easy accessibility are unlikely to be so mass smoking and this is the main benefit.
  12. WW3
    WW3
    +2
    24 October 2012 16: 17
    I quit smoking and have been doing fine for 15 years already ... I haven’t even drawn .... again, separate places should be allocated for smokers so that those who do not want to breathe tobacco smoke, especially children ...

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"