The world has launched a new arms race

11
The new arms race on the planet has a pronounced regional bias. "Front line", rapidly increasing "defense" spending, today are Saudi Arabia and China. According to a report from the International Peace Research Institute, defense spending has increased in Asia, Africa and Eastern Europe. At the same time, the overall “race” even decreased slightly: global military spending declined last year by 0,4%. However, this does not mean that the world is “calming down”. On the contrary, the situation is heating up.

The world has launched a new arms race


According to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), countries in Eastern Europe, Asia and Africa have increased their "defense" spending. Pretty big "weapons"The growth was demonstrated in the Asia-Pacific Region (APR). But ahead of the rest are formidable Saudis.

As for the USA and the states of Western Europe, they slightly reduced the corresponding expenses.

According to a SIPRI report on the state of arms trade and arms spending for the 2014 year, the total global appropriation for military purposes last year amounted to 1,776 trillion. dollars. This figure is slightly less than in the 2013 year (by 0,4%). Its value in relation to global GDP is equal to 2,4%.

At the same time, the speakers noted that while in Western Europe and in the United States, military spending decreased, the reduction was “compensated” by increased spending on “defense” in Eastern Europe, Africa, Asia, Oceania, and the Middle East. Here, Saudi Arabia “flashed” with spending, setting a record weapon cost increase: 17%.

According to the report, the Saudi Arabian defense budget amounted to $ 80,8 billion.

Recall, Saudi Arabia is now leading a coalition of forces ("Middle Eastern NATO"), fighting against the Hussites in Yemen. Some analysts believe that the main goal of the Saudis and their allies is Iran. However, it is doubtful that the Saudis, weak in military spirit, should decide on open confrontation with Iran.

The press quotes the opinion of Sam Perlo-Freeman, department head at the International Institute for Peace Studies on Military Expenditures. He believes that at the moment the increase in military spending reflects a general deterioration of security in the world. On the other hand, the increase in military spending is caused by corruption, personal interests and the rule of autocrats in other states.

China showed a high increase in military spending. Celestial has increased the corresponding spending on 9,7%. Their volume at the end of last year reached 216 billion.

The leader in the cost of an arms race remains the United States. True, in a crisis Washington reduces the rate of spending. SIPRI reports that in 2014, the United States reduced military spending by 6,5%. However, the world leadership in military spending still remains behind them. The United States spends three times more money on “defense” than the PRC. The authors of the report focus readers on the fact that the expenditures on armaments of the United States remain at the highest level. According to SIPRI, the level of military spending in 2014 in real terms almost corresponds to the peak level of the end of 1980's.

Last year, the United States spent the war (we will call things by their names) 610 billion dollars (3,5% of GDP).

In China, if we take the ratio of its military expenditures to GDP, spending is not so high. According to SIPRI experts, China’s defense expenditures have had a stable figure for GDP for a decade: 2-2,2%. Of course, in absolute terms, this indicator increased (as already indicated above, by 9,7%), since the GDP of the PRC grows every year.

However, SIPRI believes that Beijing underestimates defense spending. Experts have no doubt that official expenses do not include spending on relevant military research, on the import of weapons, on the construction of military infrastructure facilities, and also on military pensions.

The third place in the “rating” of SIPRI was taken by Russia: 4,8% of the global volume of military spending for the last year. According to the speakers, Russia's military spending in 2014 amounted to 84,5 billion dollars (4,5% of GDP). Experts recorded an increase of 2013% compared to 8,1 year.

Experts do not associate the increase in spending in Russia with the Ukrainian crisis. The report specifically states that Moscow planned an increase in spending “before the crisis in Ukraine.” Moreover, due to lower oil prices and cuts in budget items, the defense budget was updated - it decreased by 5%.

The authors of the study also indicated that in real terms, defense spending in Russia next year (that is, in the 2015 year) will increase by approximately 15%. Experts also know what the Russians will spend money on: the cost of purchasing military equipment will increase by more than 60%. In the 2016-17 years, according to SIPRI, the Russians will continue to actively spend money on defense.

It should be mentioned another large country.

Japan in the 2014 year, contrary to expectations, did not show a significant increase in defense spending. Experts point out that spending on weapons of the rising sun was almost preserved at the level of 2013. Tokyo ranks only ninth in the list of countries with the largest military budgets.

Finally, Ukraine occupies a significant place in the report.

Her spending on weapons, according to SIPRI, increased by 23% and amounted to 4 billion dollars (an estimate, by the way, inconclusive). Experts write that the estimate does not include all the costs of the war. In addition, the speakers note that in the 2015 year, Ukraine is going to double military spending.

In the Ukrainian “context”, SIPRI reports with alarm the trend towards augmenting military budgets by the countries of Central Europe, the Baltic States and Scandinavia.

As for other regions, in SIPRI point to a change in the geopolitical situation in the Middle East. It is not difficult to explain the Riyadh record: Saudi Arabia acts simultaneously on several fronts: arms the Syrian "oppositionists", participates in a coalition against the "Islamic State" put together by Washington, and leads its own coalition fighting against the Hussites (Shiites) in Yemen.

Experts also drew attention to the growing tensions in the South China and East China Seas.

“If we take objective data, there is still an increase in military spending,” the newspaper explained "Sight" editor of the magazine "Arsenal of the Fatherland" Viktor Murakhovsky. - This is due to the fact that there is a rise in price of a new generation of weapons and military equipment. SIPRI has a peculiar method of calculation. When you start counting on the physical volume of weapons and military equipment, it turns out that they have increased slightly. Some SIPRI extrapolate, especially for those countries that do not officially give their expenses. This, for example, China and Iran. Then, in the expenses of some western countries they do not take into account something. For example, they do not take into account the expenses of the US Atomic Energy Commission, and there is a considerable share. The National Security Agency, which deals almost exclusively with military tasks, does not take into account the expenses of the National Intelligence Agency, which manages the military satellite group. In addition, the Americans have separate lines for military operations, they are also not taken into account by SIPRI. ”

The expert spoke about the growth of military spending in the Asia-Pacific region: “A few years ago, the Americans declared that they are transferring the main military efforts to the Asia-Pacific region. It is there that the main groups and the largest bases are concentrated. China, accordingly, is increasing its capacity for action not only in the coastal, but also in the far sea zone. He is building now large series of ships and submarines that can operate in the ocean zone. That is, they see a threat from the United States. Nevertheless, their military budget is about three times less than the US. "

The trend, we add, is clear: as a result of a new arms race and new “records” in increasing military budgets, the planet may be on the verge of a world war. From the actions of the Saudis and some of their "coalition" friends who are prone to total Islamism, the Middle East can flare up like a match. If the war covers Iran, the consequences will be virtually impossible to predict. One thing is clear: Saudi Arabia will not be healthy.

As for China, the US is doing everything to weaken its power. The recent voyage of the US Secretary of Defense for the Asia-Pacific region proves exactly that. Ashton Carter quite frankly voiced the goal of two international visits: strengthening military-technical cooperation with Japan and South Korea. It is absolutely clear: the Pentagon intends to build a ring of allies around China.

Probably, following the results of 2015, the increase in military budgets by the countries of Central Europe, the Baltic States and Scandinavia will be recorded. This will be associated with the "Russian threat."

Whether Kiev will increase military spending is a big question. Have something to build up?

Observed and commented on Oleg Chuvakin
- especially for topwar.ru
11 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    April 17 2015 05: 53
    After what Baran Obama and his predecessors get up, any state I repeat, any one wants to have not just more weapons of any type, but most importantly nuclear and its delivery vehicles. The fact that this is the only argument so that you are not bombed and made color revolutions two in one. So simple weapons are just flowers so for the peace of the citizens such that there is something to defend and attack.
    1. -1
      April 18 2015 00: 18
      keep the powder dry.
      if you don’t want to feed your army, you will feed someone else’s ...
  2. +5
    April 17 2015 06: 51
    The horror of the situation is that when all countries start rattling weapons, the likelihood of conflict grows exponentially. The world war does not care where it starts, it is important for it that more and more portions of "fuel" are thrown into its fire. The Middle East is already on fire. And the countries are rattling their weapons louder and louder.
  3. +5
    April 17 2015 07: 27
    The main thing is that the next arms race does not end in a global war. And survive the rest, Russia is not accustomed to the Western confrontation.
  4. +7
    April 17 2015 07: 29
    The United States is the undisputed leader in spending. In everything. From the principle.
    There is only one detail: the same unconditionally mediocre.
    There is no sense in participating in the race of military budgets (given who is the owner of the world money machine so far).
    I'd like to believe in the recent phrase of the GDP: "We will go the other way."
  5. James Cameron
    +5
    April 17 2015 07: 50
    Hurry to stuff Kazakhstan and Belarus with the full sets of S-400 / Buk-M3 / Tor-M2K / Shell-C1, but something began to stink of democracy ....
  6. +1
    April 17 2015 10: 30
    Interestingly, Podvitsky even ever portray in his cartoons of Russian man, not an animal?
    1. +2
      April 17 2015 23: 59
      Better to see yourself in a humanoid, good-natured bear,
      than in a monkey-like, black man!
  7. 0
    April 17 2015 10: 31
    The Ram of Deception is clearly divorced from real life. Apparently his advisers are the same as the Psaki.
  8. +1
    April 17 2015 11: 20
    These analyzes are very conditional. In the USSR, I remember, a very small amount for defense was voiced. The main expenses were hidden in other lines of the budget. so now. The structure of these expenses is interesting. for example, as I understand it, the US military budget also takes into account rather large pensions and medical services, which includes a lot of things that our veterans and retirees did not even dream about. Again, the army is fully contracted, and therefore includes salaries, social security, etc. Therefore, the amount of expenses probably indicates the power of the Armed Forces, but not so unambiguously. And it turns out that our military budget is equal to the expenses of Saudi Arabia, which, you see, is strange, given the size of the aircraft and their weapons (something is not heard about the presence of atomic submarines, strategic missile forces and satellite constellations in the SA).
  9. wk
    +4
    April 17 2015 12: 58
    primitive cartoons, where the Russians are harsh, strong but fair "bears", and the Americans and the West in general are cowardly weak and vile creatures (this is according to the illustration for the article and not only for this ... ... a resource is slipping towards some kind of cheap jaundice ...) resembles the abundance of such cartoons at the beginning of the First World War ("imperialist") ... then everything ended sadly for Russia, and at the beginning of the Second World War the motto "armor is strong and tanks our fast "and more popular and obscene, to put it mildly, did not work ... I want our patriotic analysts to pay more attention to the problems of the Russian Army, its economy and society ... otherwise, from the beginning, you read IN, watch cartoons ... then you leave the house ... you go to the store, to work ... somehow everything is not so rosy!
  10. +2
    April 17 2015 18: 10
    kukryniksykukryniksy


    kukryniksykukryniksy


    I hope nobody will classify Kukryniks masterpieces as low-artistic pictures hi

    This is a 1979 caricature - history repeats itself.
  11. +1
    April 17 2015 20: 16
    Quote: nadezhiva
    The United States is the undisputed leader in spending. In everything. From the principle.
    There is only one detail: the same unconditionally mediocre.
    There is no sense in participating in the race of military budgets (given who is the owner of the world money machine so far).
    I'd like to believe in the recent phrase of the GDP: "We will go the other way."

    If only this path was not the same as in the bike you quoted about space, a pen and a pencil: this is not true, there are no pencils there. Imagine what a conductive graphite rod can do, broken off from a pencil and floating freely inside a station stuffed with equipment? According to the law of justice, he will certainly close the most important conductive parts. Soviet engineers thought of such shoals beforehand.