Middle Eastern Front. Part one

8
For more than a month, the center of military tensions has shifted from the briefly dying down east of Ukraine to the newly boiling Middle East. There is no chance here we are talking about, the calculation of arsonists in this direction is extremely simple and cynical. And no one hides the main goal. A big war in the Middle East will give a sharp rise in the dollar to all other world currencies. As you know, oil is traded in dollars, and in many respects, black gold gives green securities their current value. The massive abandonment of the dollar, which has been noted in world trade, is caused by the fact that the United States has dramatically increased the production of its main product, giving rise to the legitimate concerns of all other market participants about the reliability of the US currency.



Now Washington strikes back. Doubt in the dollar? Get it! Such is the business of blood. Such tactics worked three times already (remember the first and second world wars, as well as the collapse of the Soviet Union), and the American banking elites would very much like to repeat everything for the fourth time. No wonder that a whole century on the world map, geopolitical bombs were laid one by one ... The time for their one-time blast has come.

A big war does not start suddenly. For her always long and thoroughly prepared. Obviously, the number of weapons accumulated in the Middle East, as well as the severity of ideological and territorial disputes, have long reached a critical mass. If the Ukrainian crisis revealed the unwillingness of Europeans to again turn their continent into one big ashes, here, on the contrary, they are ready to fight for a long time, hard and to the bitter end. In addition to the sun, the hot blood of the local population is constantly warmed up by reminders of past mutual offenses, real or fictional. Splinters of the great Middle Eastern war, if it does take place, will inevitably catch Europe and Russia and East Asia in the form of many millions of refugees (only in Germany alone and only Syrian internally displaced persons now number around 100 thousand) and economic losses the scale of which is still difficult to imagine. Also, interruptions in the supply of hydrocarbons from the Persian Gulf zone will knock the soil out from under the feet of the developed economies of the Far East - China, Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, which just receive oil and gas from the Middle East region. The United States is reliably provided with considerable reserves of its own resources, which in the era of global instability will become an obvious competitive advantage. Hello again, the growth of the dollar! Everything is just so that there is even a slight disappointment with the primitiveness of the plan.

This begs the question: is the United States ready to throw its allies, Saudi Arabia and Israel, into a direct or indirect conflict with Iran? Yes, ready. The Saudis, for example, have become too independent and Washington, where the struggle of its own elites continues, is to its liking. Israel ... who is this Israel? Both Middle Eastern powers were cultivated by Americans all these decades with the sole purpose - to launch a torpedo at the right moment into the existing world order, blowing up everything around them. In this, both Saudi Arabia and Israel very much resemble the current Ukraine. Each of these countries has a messianic ideology, which is later cast into bullets and shells, destroying everything and everyone. Something painfully familiar, isn't it?



And then, if a few smaller states appear on the site of big Saudi Arabia, then the Americans will lose nothing economically, but they will win geopolitically, because it will be much easier for small, only emerging states to dictate their will. And the oil is not going anywhere.

And again the question arises: how close are the predictions about the collapse of the largest Middle Eastern monarchy to reality? Surely hard to say. Saudi Arabia is more like the traditional empire of the XIX - XX centuries, than the great powers of the present. The absolute monarchy, the harsh religiousness of society and the state, the territory welded by military force from the conquered independent states, a disproportionately large army and navy — in the 21st century it all looks like a dinosaur, not known to have survived world cataclysms. However, nothing eternal in a dynamically changing world is not and cannot be. The population in Saudi Arabia does not want to work, but it is accustomed to a high level of consumption. The fall in the standard of living may well cause discontent, especially against the background of military failures, if the army of the Kingdom nevertheless decides to enter Yemen. And there and close to the collapse of the country. Traditionally, the original Saudi land is only Nedzh, and Hijaz, Jebel Shammar, and Asher are former independent states conquered and joined by force to the Saudi empire. The position of conquered peoples turned out to be Shiite Muslims, who are forced to live not only in conditions much worse than the conditionally titular nation, but also subject to constant repression. Poverty, mixed with religious infringement, creates an explosive mixture, which so far has been able to keep in check only by brute force, based on the same petrodollars.

Middle Eastern Front. Part one


Like any empire that was moving towards its own decline, the Saudi monarchy fell into insanity, deciding to play in a great world power. Obviously, the new king, who has long been fed up with all the carnal joys, wants the immortal glory of the great conqueror and founder of the dynasty of Abdul-Aziz ibn Saud. That's just planning new increments, you should not forget another wisdom: walking on someone else's head, you carry yours.

The Israeli leadership has also fallen into insanity, albeit not so obvious, and it seems that even the tactical alliance with the Middle Eastern monarchies against Shiites in general and Iran in particular is ready to go. But if monarchies risk the collapse of their kingdoms, then Israel put at stake its very existence - not only the state, but also the people.

It is clear that in such conditions the confrontation will be very tough, and no one will ask for it or beg for mercy. The spectacle promises to be interesting ...
8 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. BIBINET
    -1
    April 16 2015 06: 37
    you have fallen into madness and insanity, or the climax of reason or cotton is too vigorous and that Georgia threatened to destroy Russia like Iran, or maybe Georgia creates an atomic bomb to drop on Russia or maybe Georgia occupied part of Russia or maybe when Israel delivered weapons to Georgia, Georgia was an outcast country? maybe Israel can’t sell weapons to anyone in the same inadequate Russia? But didn’t Israel unilaterally stop the supply of arms to Georgia in violation of its agreements with it and quarrel only in favor of Russia? but Russia has been working hard for decades on craping Israel and delivering weapons and hezbollah and all the terrorists around with your missiles are killing us to blow us up and now you are insolent nowhere else to go shitting on the little things we closed our eyes but now the question of the existence of Israel itself isn’t your talk brainless television and you are forced to take retaliatory steps because the rabid dog is told correctly a hundred versts no brain hook no count the cripple so we cure you fine aesculapius in our haif and treat such haemorrhoids
    1. +2
      April 16 2015 06: 53
      Disappear provocateur. It’s been sitting in your head for a long time that everyone is spoiling you, and you are the most spoilers, the loners who are hiding behind the flag of the state that the USSR helped create at the time.
    2. 0
      April 16 2015 11: 19
      Man, do you have personal problems?
      You mention that you have good Aesculapians .... so maybe go, I hope you get a little better ....... uh, your worldview
      1. ffrgg
        +1
        April 16 2015 21: 51
        Response to S-300 Threat: F-35 Invisible Fighters
        Steve Over, Head of Lockheed Martin's International Business Department, arrives in Israel. Speaking to the Israeli military and journalists, Over stated that the fifth-generation F-35 fighter was designed taking into account the capabilities of the S-300 missile defense system and other threats of this kind.

        Fighter-Stelt F-35 will begin to go into service with the IDF Air Force at the end of next year.

        Over said that "countries like Russia and China have the ability to create and manufacture advanced air defense systems and aircraft, and are ready to sell them to anyone who pays the most."

        According to Over, the F-35 "has the ability to counter" systems such as the S-300. Over said that it no longer makes sense to invest in the modernization of the fourth generation F-16 fighters, and that the acquisition of the F-35 will be accompanied by a "leap in capabilities" due to the fact that this machine is technologically ahead of its predecessors by 15 years.

        In addition to radar evasion features, the F-35 has the ability to maneuver and powerful spectral sensors, Over says: "The pilot will know everything about his surroundings. This provides him with intelligence capabilities that no other nation has until now." ...

        Due to the fact that the databases and F-35 sensors will be interconnected, they will be able to fly in formations at a distance of 70-160 km km between aircraft. This makes it virtually impossible to spot them with radars.

        In addition, Over says the F-35 has a "larger angle of attack" which increases the aircraft's maneuverability.

        The Americans are seriously preoccupied with suppressing new missile defense systems that could be in the hands of hostile regimes. F-35 is only part of a new strategy to suppress enemy air defense.

        A new project by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) envisages an attack on enemy air defense positions using "swarm tactics" - a variety of cheap cruise missiles and drones. The F-35 in this configuration will serve as an operational headquarters and direction center.
      2. ffrgg
        0
        April 16 2015 21: 51
        Response to S-300 Threat: F-35 Invisible Fighters
        Steve Over, Head of Lockheed Martin's International Business Department, arrives in Israel. Speaking to the Israeli military and journalists, Over stated that the fifth-generation F-35 fighter was designed taking into account the capabilities of the S-300 missile defense system and other threats of this kind.

        Fighter-Stelt F-35 will begin to go into service with the IDF Air Force at the end of next year.

        Over said that "countries like Russia and China have the ability to create and manufacture advanced air defense systems and aircraft, and are ready to sell them to anyone who pays the most."

        According to Over, the F-35 "has the ability to counter" systems such as the S-300. Over said that it no longer makes sense to invest in the modernization of the fourth generation F-16 fighters, and that the acquisition of the F-35 will be accompanied by a "leap in capabilities" due to the fact that this machine is technologically ahead of its predecessors by 15 years.

        In addition to radar evasion features, the F-35 has the ability to maneuver and powerful spectral sensors, Over says: "The pilot will know everything about his surroundings. This provides him with intelligence capabilities that no other nation has until now." ...

        Due to the fact that the databases and F-35 sensors will be interconnected, they will be able to fly in formations at a distance of 70-160 km km between aircraft. This makes it virtually impossible to spot them with radars.

        In addition, Over says the F-35 has a "larger angle of attack" which increases the aircraft's maneuverability.

        The Americans are seriously preoccupied with suppressing new missile defense systems that could be in the hands of hostile regimes. F-35 is only part of a new strategy to suppress enemy air defense.

        A new project by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) envisages an attack on enemy air defense positions using "swarm tactics" - a variety of cheap cruise missiles and drones. The F-35 in this configuration will serve as an operational headquarters and direction center.
  2. +7
    April 16 2015 06: 55
    if several smaller states appear on the site of large Saudi Arabia, then the Americans have not lost anything economically, but they will benefit geopolitically, because it will be much easier for small, only emerging states to dictate their will. And oil is not going anywhere.

    The old principle is "divide and conquer." It almost always works and benefits the person who implements it.
    1. +5
      April 16 2015 07: 02
      “Walking on someone else’s head, you carry your own”


      C-300 is a defensive complex. We do not sell tanks or Iskander to Iran. laughing
      As I understand it, BIBINET, are you so nervous that you will not be able to bomb Iran with impunity?
      By the way, how did UAV sales in Georgia look from your ethics point of view?
  3. BIBINET
    0
    April 16 2015 07: 01
    Quote: rotmistr60
    Disappear provocateur. It’s been sitting in your head for a long time that everyone is spoiling you, and you are the most spoilers, the loners who are hiding behind the flag of the state that the USSR helped create at the time.

    and who then supplies the c300 weapon to Iran, maybe the Martians, and who supplies the yakhont rockets and cornets to Hamas, maybe phantomas? okay with you with carnets and yachts, shit, shit, shit, quietly but with 300 this already threatens the very existence of Zion and for that you answer you attacked Georgia you attacked Ukraine we were silent we didn’t even impose sanctions or bikotism or condemnation but that’s not enough for you the appetite of shitting comes with food, see your stomach so that it does not crack from the guvine which of you rushing from all shelles
    1. 0
      April 16 2015 07: 11
      Quote: BIBINET
      and who is delivering rockets yachont and cornets to Hamas maybe phantom?


      Are you sure about the yacht? it’s not worth falling into delirium
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. The comment was deleted.
        1. +4
          April 16 2015 10: 54
          Nobody has delivered anything to them yet)) Israel also has a lot to deliver to whom. How will Iran’s air defense system interfere with Israel’s life if it does not plan to attack Iran?
  4. 0
    April 16 2015 07: 11
    About the same epithets describe Russia to the western man in the street - as a crowd of stupid barbarians. The article caused me skepticism. what
    1. +1
      April 16 2015 08: 50
      they always represent us as barbarians, then they don’t understand why they grabbed us. nothing their history teaches.
  5. The comment was deleted.
  6. The comment was deleted.
  7. The comment was deleted.
    1. 0
      April 16 2015 09: 43
      Quietly rustling with slate, the roof goes slowly. We hung, sickly, feel better.
    2. +4
      April 16 2015 10: 41
      Why so much resentment, dear?

      1) The arms of the national liberation movements of the Palestinian Authority and Lebanon are supplied by Iran and Syria, not Russia in any way.
      2) Georgia was bombed as part of a short-term military operation and Israel could not deliver weapons for reasons beyond its control.
      3) On the bombing of Ukraine is better to provide evidence.
      4) Naturally, Russia will supply the S-300 to Iran, there is a contract, obligations and financial need. Naturally, Israel will supply UAVs, rifle and ammunition for the same reasons. Naturally they will shoot and kill him, such a time.

      You have chosen the wrong site for arguing about anything.

      Sincerely.
  8. Yuri Gagarin
    0
    April 16 2015 16: 13
    I would replace "hello dollar growth" with "hello dollar demand."
  9. Bibi Netanyahu
    +1
    April 16 2015 17: 33
    Quote: rotmistr60
    Disappear provocateur. It’s been sitting in your head for a long time that everyone is spoiling you, and you are the most spoilers, the loners who are hiding behind the flag of the state that the USSR helped create at the time.

    and which the Ayatollah’s hands are now trying to destroy
  10. Bibi Netanyahu
    0
    April 16 2015 17: 36
    Quote: testerman
    Man, do you have personal problems?
    You mention that you have good Aesculapians .... so maybe go, I hope you get a little better ....... uh, your worldview

    we don’t have such telekiller Kisilev and Svanidze they can do professional liars and liars brainwashers
  11. Bibi Netanyahu
    0
    April 16 2015 17: 41
    Quote: mishastich
    Why so much resentment, dear?

    1) The arms of the national liberation movements of the Palestinian Authority and Lebanon are supplied by Iran and Syria, not Russia in any way.
    2) Georgia was bombed as part of a short-term military operation and Israel could not deliver weapons for reasons beyond its control.
    3) On the bombing of Ukraine is better to provide evidence.
    4) Naturally, Russia will supply the S-300 to Iran, there is a contract, obligations and financial need. Naturally, Israel will supply UAVs, rifle and ammunition for the same reasons. Naturally they will shoot and kill him, such a time.

    You have chosen the wrong site for arguing about anything.

    Sincerely.

    and which site or are there two opinions of yours and wrong? or maybe because you have no true answers to my questions, I don’t invest too much in the general politra to fool readers?
  12. Bibi Netanyahu
    0
    April 16 2015 20: 32
    Quote: a52333
    “Walking on someone else’s head, you carry your own”


    C-300 is a defensive complex. We do not sell tanks or Iskander to Iran. laughing
    As I understand it, BIBINET, are you so nervous that you will not be able to bomb Iran with impunity?
    By the way, how did UAV sales in Georgia look from your ethics point of view?

    we don’t need to transfer everything from a sick mind to a healthy one; we sold the very same UAVs to Russia. among other things, Georgia did not threaten to destroy Russia in any way, but Iran’s ayatollah regime doesn’t hide it either! And by the way, when the Zion bombed Iran, what glitches in your head started pretending to be reality?
    1. 0
      April 18 2015 13: 12
      Georgia quite realistically killed Russian peacekeepers; the Islamic Republic of Iran, unlike Israel and the United States, did not start a single war
  13. Bibi Netanyahu
    0
    April 18 2015 18: 38
    Quote: Pissarro
    Georgia quite realistically killed Russian peacekeepers; the Islamic Republic of Iran, unlike Israel and the United States, did not start a single war

    Iran wars a proxy war in Lebanon in a gas in Yemen in Syria; its soldiers and generals and its satellites fight and kill thousands of people in these countries every day in the same Yemen.
  14. 0
    April 19 2015 19: 39
    what are you pumping. I don’t think that such a massacre will begin there, as described here. why fight? because of yemen? the poorest country with huge unemployment, no one will harness it because of it