US Department of State: Washington is concerned about Moscow’s decision to supply C-300 complexes to Iran

97
State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf said that Washington is concerned about Moscow’s decision to supply of C-300 missile systems to Iran.

US Department of State: Washington is concerned about Moscow’s decision to supply C-300 complexes to Iran


“We have long expressed our concerns. (...) We do not consider this constructive, ”Harf RIA quotes "News".

The representative of the State Department noted that "US Secretary of State John Kerry raised this issue in today's conversation with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov."

According to her, the US concerns are based on Iran’s “destabilizing actions in the region,” particularly in Yemen.

Newspaper "Sight" also notes that White House press secretary Josh Ernest said that Washington is considering the possibility of imposing unilateral sanctions against the Russian Federation in the case of supplying Tehran with Russian goods in exchange for oil.

“We are, of course, aware of the proposals, which essentially consist in the barter supply of Iranian oil in exchange for Russian goods. We study the details. And if this kind of agreement moves forward, it will cause serious concern, potentially sanctions concern, ”Ernest stressed.

At the same time, he noted that the situation with the barter agreement is “different from” the situation with the possible delivery of Russian C-300 anti-aircraft missile systems to Iran.
  • http://ria.ru/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

97 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +52
    April 14 2015 06: 33
    The Americans could say bluntly - in the event we have a desire to bomb Iran, we will encounter certain difficulties. And then:

    “We have long been voicing our concerns. (...) We do not consider it constructive. "
    1. +32
      April 14 2015 06: 38
      State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf said that Washington is concerned about the decision of Moscow to supply C-300 missile systems to Iran.

      I would be speechless if you, the striped devils, were not worried.
      1. +15
        April 14 2015 07: 21
        It is necessary to put C-300 faster to Iran, then we will have another ally on the southern borders. And the embargo is not scary for us, we have shown it to the whole world. It makes our state only stronger and independent of the USA and European states. tongue
        1. +1
          April 14 2015 07: 57
          Staffers do not want Iran to be supplied with S-300. They don’t want, so let them not deliver. And we somehow quietly across the Caspian Sea, but through the mountains ...
        2. +2
          April 14 2015 08: 15
          Enemies of a common enemy are sometimes not quite friends.
          1. +2
            April 14 2015 11: 41
            I agree that Iran is not our friend at all, but a partner in the fight against the states, and it is extremely useful to supply the S-300. in 2010 Medvedev merged the deal under pressure from "smoked" and he also leaked Libya. Our ships were already in ports ready to unload military equipment, but Dima did not give the order to unload, as a result, the country plunged into chaos and practically ceased to exist
        3. The comment was deleted.
        4. +6
          April 14 2015 08: 30
          Quote: Simon
          It is necessary to put the S-300 faster to Iran, then we will have another ally on the southern borders.

          Yes, give up. What are allies? S-300 is needed for the protection of nuclear facilities in which case. The fact that the Persians will have nuclear weapons is a matter of time. We are being squeezed out of the European energy market, intending to give our niche to the Persians., Turkmens and Azerbaijanis, and you are talking about some allies. Holy simplicity.
        5. 0
          April 14 2015 09: 04
          Quote: Simon
          It is necessary to put C-300 faster to Iran, then we will have another ally on the southern borders. And the embargo is not scary for us, we have shown it to the whole world. It makes our state only stronger and independent of the USA and European states. tongue

          and supply to all allies angry That’s why the Americans are already going to make 6 pipelats of the first generation without finishing Lightning. To close the sky for the flights of their vaunted Raptor with B-2 ... still bastions there to block the strait
        6. 0
          April 14 2015 09: 14
          Quote: Simon
          It is necessary to put the S-300 faster to Iran

          and Syria
          1. -1
            April 14 2015 09: 25
            Quote: skeket
            Quote: Simon
            It is necessary to put the S-300 faster to Iran

            and Syria

            and Syria S-300 on a fig? Is she constantly bombed?
      2. +2
        April 14 2015 07: 49
        Yes, no matter how you look, they are always worried about something. That is the teachings of Ukraine! Now, even with the contacts of the Russian Federation with Iran, schizophrenia with the mania of investigation is not far away.
        1. +1
          April 14 2015 08: 10
          Keep it up for a long time was Medvedev's disgrace to correct
      3. +1
        April 14 2015 07: 51
        But Moscow is somehow not worried that Washington is worried!
      4. +1
        April 14 2015 08: 16
        I would have lost the power of speech if you, devils striped, did not bother

        Powerfully
        1. 0
          April 14 2015 09: 08
          Eugene-Eugene


          I wanted to put + but Lyashko on the avarque ...
          1. +1
            April 14 2015 10: 29
            Okay, I will think, what to replace, since they do not understand my humor (you are not the first to speak out on this subject)
            1. +1
              April 14 2015 11: 10
              Quote: Eugene-Eugene
              Okay, I will think, what to replace, since they do not understand my humor (you are not the first to speak out on this subject)

              Humor is understandable only to lyashko shatters very much
          2. 0
            April 14 2015 12: 56
            Quote: Deniska
            I wanted to put + but Lyashko on the avarque ...

            Similarly))) Now, plus.
      5. +1
        April 14 2015 09: 19
        And the states are worried about us. We are a sovereign state and make our own decisions.
        1. 0
          April 14 2015 11: 43
          sovereignty is far away, while there are more enemies inside than outside
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +6
      April 14 2015 06: 40
      So the United States has now begun to kiss Iran almost in a hickey. What's wrong again?
      1. +8
        April 14 2015 06: 45
        Quote: ImperialKolorad
        So the United States has now begun to kiss Iran almost in a hickey. What's wrong again?

        Yes, no one kisses there - this is the appearance of the world. Israel is still pondering what to say about this. To say or immediately to fuck at the complexes when they arrive there.
        Then again, Russia can be blamed, such as the Russians provoked a conflict by putting complexes.
        1. +2
          April 14 2015 06: 50
          pisayutsa mattresses smile
          their force intervention rushed to zero
        2. +2
          April 14 2015 08: 53
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          Israel is still considering what to say about this.

          What do the Jews say? The states have cooled to them, so the matter of saving the drowning, etc. according to the text. They will agree with the Saudis on the corridor and bomb off nuclear facilities if it gets hotter. These notorious objects are numerous and scattered throughout Iran, so the only thing they will achieve is to push Iran’s nuclear weapons program five to ten years back. A mess will be necessary. And here we are in the exaltation of the Persians in the allies recorded. Laugh.
        3. 0
          April 14 2015 09: 12
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          Israel is still pondering what to say about this. To say or immediately to hammer at the complexes when they arrive there.
          Then again, Russia can be blamed, such as the Russians provoked a conflict by putting complexes.

          So the S-300 is for defense, not for attack) Do not fly brazenly over Iranian territory, but do not throw bombs and missiles at it, and you won’t have to worry.
      2. +5
        April 14 2015 07: 18
        immediately after the negotiations, they tested an anti-bunker bomb for those who do not believe in the triumph of democracy. But since a real plane must carry the bomb, then Iran’s S-300 is of concern in the white house feel
        1. 0
          April 14 2015 11: 46
          just to the point, it was in response to the tests of the anti-bunker bomb that the GDP suddenly decided to put the S-300
      3. 0
        April 14 2015 08: 27
        So they climbed out to kiss, and there already the ass of Russia to meet them ...
      4. The comment was deleted.
    4. +1
      April 14 2015 06: 43
      “We have long been voicing our concerns. (...) We do not consider it constructive. "

      As the saying goes:
      Clear.
      1. 0
        April 14 2015 06: 58
        And what is there to worry the State Department about Iran, they would ... and better about the unconstitutional coup in Ukraine, they were so worried.
        The contract for the supply of Russian S-300 systems to Iran was signed at the end of 2007. Official sources did not name its exact cost, but the media wrote that Russia was supposed to supply Tehran with five divisions of the S-300PMU-1 anti-aircraft missile system (SAM) for a total of about $ 800 million. The United States and Israel tried to hinder the implementation of the contract.
        In June 2010, the UN Security Council adopted resolution 1929, imposing restrictions on the supply of conventional weapons to Iran, including missiles and missile systems, tanks, attack helicopters, combat aircraft, and ships. On September 22, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev signed a decree prohibiting the implementation of a UN Security Council resolution of the delivery to Iran of S-300 air defense systems or materiel related to them, including spare parts.
        Iran reacted with indignation at Russia's decision to withdraw from the contract. Iranian Defense Minister General Ahmad Vahidi then said that Russia humiliates itself, following the lead of the international community on this issue. Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was even more harsh: he said, hinting at the United States that Russia had abandoned the contract "under the influence of Satan." Tehran threatened the Russian Federation with a court and stated that soon Iran would develop air defense systems that would significantly surpass the outdated S-300 in terms of their parameters.
        1. 0
          April 14 2015 07: 12
          Quote: Dembel 77
          President of Russia Dmitry Medvedev

          This iPhone has done a lot of troubles, being at the helm. And for some reason, it is still found in large leaders. Is he irreplaceable ???
          1. 0
            April 14 2015 08: 23
            VVP, just keeps his word ... Ayfosha was promised the prime minister’s chair for the period from 12 to 18 years. And the president keeps his promises, especially public ones. I hope for the second term his promises did not extend.
          2. +1
            April 14 2015 08: 42
            First of all, all strategically important directions have been deduced from under it.
            Secondly, are you not considering the option "beautiful" girlfriend + "scary" girlfriend?
          3. The comment was deleted.
          4. 0
            April 14 2015 11: 48
            it’s too early ... FSE is under control
        2. +1
          April 14 2015 08: 44
          Quote: Dembel 77
          And what is the State Department worrying about Iran

          1. A barter deal with Iran "oil for goods" is already underway. "Barter is carried out in exchange for supplies of Iranian crude oil, and we supply certain types of products," Ryabkov said.
          2. One of the largest US and world banks Morgan Stanley said that he had sold the Russian oil company Rosneft, a division involved in the sale of oil, as well as its storage and transportation. The financial side of the transaction was not disclosed. (Rosneft will receive, in the framework of the transaction, in particular, a 49% stake in Heidmar Holdings LLC, which manages a fleet of about 100 tankers).
          3. The project of the Asian Oil and Gas Exchange, where hydrocarbons will be traded for a "basket of local currencies", and not for the dollar, gaining control over such a volume of oil (and, in the future, gas) is a step that brings Russia and its allies very close to breaking the "petrodollar needles ", in which" Koscheeva's death "of our overseas haters.
          4. Moscow’s decision to supply S-300 missile systems to Iran.
          Add 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 and ...
          So America howled. Hopes to tame Iran were covered with a copper basin, along with the prospects to annoy the Russian Federation. (+ Violently offended European lobby + rabid sheikhs).
        3. The comment was deleted.
      2. 0
        April 14 2015 10: 13
        Bon Appetit!
    5. +9
      April 14 2015 06: 55
      State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf said that Washington is concerned about the decision of Moscow to supply C-300 missile systems to Iran.

      And we are worried.
      If war begins on our southern borders, we have nowhere to go: refugees, humanitarian aid, compassion for the humiliated and offended ...
      And so, they might beware of bombing ...
      So, if the amers do not like, then done right!
    6. +4
      April 14 2015 06: 57
      Of course, they are worried, because the invasion of Iran can become a big problem for America.
      1. 0
        April 14 2015 07: 23
        This is Russia's concern at hand!
    7. +1
      April 14 2015 07: 15
      Sassali Americans, do not lurk on Iran from the air to watch
    8. 0
      April 14 2015 07: 22
      it’s precisely they who are afraid that their attacks will be inconclusive, not only that, and not small
    9. 0
      April 14 2015 07: 25
      They are properly worried, because they cannot fly with impunity.
    10. +1
      April 14 2015 08: 08
      Distance between Tehran, Iran and Seattle, Washington, USA. 10744 km = 6676 miles.
      The firing range of the s-300 complexes .. ".. from several kilometers - up to 150, 200, 300 kilometers, depending on the type of elements of the S-300 family used and, in particular, interceptor missiles" ..
      so that the Yankees breathe deeper and sleep soundly .. and take care of your nervous system ..
    11. 0
      April 14 2015 08: 46
      The language of diplomacy. Some sys know how to use it, which means that is exactly what you wrote.
    12. 0
      April 14 2015 09: 24
      Quote: rotmistr60
      We have long been voicing our concerns. (...) We do not consider it constructive. "

      Hi, why did they speak directly? The Jews will be the first to go and they have long worked out the options. struggle with this system. They have long been trained in tandem with the S-300. Any system has its own peculiarities, which is why it has another system with it that eliminates the enemy’s breakthrough windows .. And the enemy will never act at random. The weakest link in the most complicated systems people. Faith in their weapons depends a lot on their skills and courage. And Iran is a weak country. The economy is struggling to cope with the problems that arise. Sanctions are hitting the economy and the whole country and the population especially .. And this is not a year, not two, but decades. The technological lag is growing. The United States is well aware of this and clearly speculates on it. The Yankees will never allow the growth of Tehran's economy. There should be only one reign in the region, and this is TEL AVIV. Tehran itself aspires to the SCO and to EURASES. Our experts in the East are rushing about rumors about Tehran’s Muslim danger. And the Yankees are echoing them yes and yes. I have always wondered how wise men can frighten everyone. What’s interesting is they in this country, but they say disgusting. Why our experts that work of a completely different opinion. I have long been concerned about the question, and if at their own expense they will be worn there, the opinion will be different. For me, the authorities in these countries have long been Academician Primakov, Satanovsky. But our liberal media do not like them. And many have a vague idea of ​​Iran itself. In general, our valiant ORT, Russia-24 are completely silent about these countries, but everyone knows that occurs in the EU. A very strange policy of these channels. In the information age and nothing about Armenia, Azerbaijan, Iran. And the United States is taking full advantage of the possibility of lifting sanctions, linking along the way many problems for itself and its best friend there. Hence all these overt threats. Teheran wave their fingers saying they shouldn't go anywhere, otherwise everything will remain as it is. Although Tehran has almost nothing to do with Yemen. They expressed their position to the Yankis. The famous Whip and Gingerbread Man.
      1. +2
        April 14 2015 09: 39
        We have long been voicing our concerns. (...) We do not consider it constructive

        Earlier it was necessary to think when sanctions introduced and started Russophobic hysteria. Now take a sip in full. Just like that now it will not be possible to bomb. Mattresses will not fly on such a task, you will have to send other NATO MEMBERS. Although I think the Germans will not start airplanes again, and the rest will come up with something. And you have to fly to the Poles and other gaskets laughing
    13. 0
      April 14 2015 09: 40
      Quote: rotmistr60
      The Americans could say bluntly - in the event we have a desire to bomb Iran, we will encounter certain difficulties. And then:

      “We have long been voicing our concerns. (...) We do not consider it constructive. "

      Okay states, look how much screech came from Israel! They just talked about the possible lifting of sanctions! And what will happen after the delivery of the S-300? Air defense deprives potential aggressors of the ability to use aviation. And the use of ground operations is fraught with large casualties of the attacking side, which is unacceptable in advance request
    14. Shirioner
      -1
      April 14 2015 10: 15
      There will be no supplies of S-300 to Iran. This topic is used as a lever of pressure on America in order to prevent the supply of lethal weapons to Ukraine. As a result, they will come to an agreement: blocking the supply of arms to Ukraine in exchange for not supplying arms to Iran
      1. 0
        April 14 2015 11: 53
        there will be other measures regarding arms deliveries, the S-300 to Iran is a lever of pressure in the Middle East
  2. +3
    April 14 2015 06: 33
    The dog barks, the caravan goes ... ©
  3. +11
    April 14 2015 06: 33
    The process is underway, the "partners" are losing influence and control over the situation every day, therefore they are concerned about everything.
  4. +9
    April 14 2015 06: 35
    The newspaper Vzglyad also notes that White House spokesman Josh Ernest said Washington is considering introducing unilateral sanctions against Russia if Tehran is supplied with Russian goods in exchange for oil.

    they won’t get over their sanctions. like parrots
  5. +16
    April 14 2015 06: 38
    The funny thing is that the Americans are not even bothered by offensive weapons! Apparently, all the same, there are plans to attack Iran ..
    1. SSR
      +11
      April 14 2015 07: 01
      Quote: Magic Archer
      The funny thing is that the Americans are not even bothered by offensive weapons! Apparently, all the same, there are plans to attack Iran ..

      Yes, it's not even funny .... ABM against Iran in Europe and Russia's concern is ridiculous, the support of terrorists by kartar and the Saudis is internationally "correct", but simply calling for a peaceful dialogue in Yemen is already a disaster. The bombing of Yemen, Donbass, Syria is "correct" and the resistance to the bombers is troubling. wassat
      Personally, my concern is the aspen stake not clogged in Fashington’s heart.
      Agree comrades that the hypocrisy of the West has long gone beyond even false modesty. ((((
  6. +4
    April 14 2015 06: 46
    Comrade Assad also needs to put the S-300 in the order of humanitarian aid.
    1. 0
      April 14 2015 11: 56
      There is a signed contract, but there is no point in delivering. Russia unequivocally warned NATO members not to rock the boat and that’s enough
  7. +5
    April 14 2015 06: 49
    eh! We would come closer to Mexico. Remind about the territory that has departed to the states. Yes, and maybe put rackets. well, or at least publicly give a hint about it. I wonder what then will be the urination of Sir Washington?
    1. +4
      April 14 2015 06: 55
      To begin with, conclude an agreement with Mexico on military cooperation, the exchange of delegations, that is, on trifles ... Training is free for them to provide - on some types of armed forces. Well, then ...
      1. +2
        April 14 2015 08: 51
        And it would not hurt to declare a free trade zone with a customs union with subsequent accession and a military union.
  8. +2
    April 14 2015 06: 51
    Yes, let them enter, just send them and trade as they traded ... this will be an example to them and a kick in the ass!
    1. +3
      April 14 2015 06: 56
      100% accurate !!! Potentially, Iran’s arms market is 30 mdv. If not we, soon someone else. So let the sanctions scare.
  9. +8
    April 14 2015 06: 51
    Quote: fiction
    State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf said that Washington is concerned about the decision of Moscow to supply C-300 missile systems to Iran.

    I would be speechless if you, the striped devils, were not worried.

    clickable! good
    1. +1
      April 14 2015 08: 58
      dude, this is an offset good
  10. +1
    April 14 2015 06: 51
    US concerns are based on “Iran’s destabilizing actions in the region”

    These are impudent "fears" .... The states held negotiations with Iran, agreed on nuclear issues, reached an agreement on lifting the sanctions, and on you .... suddenly they became "destabilizing" .... Maybe it is, but why states with such a bad Iran to establish relations and cooperation ...? Ah-ah ... well, yes ... they, like others, cannot cooperate with Russia ...
  11. +3
    April 14 2015 06: 54
    Washington is considering introducing unilateral sanctions against Russia
    1. +1
      April 14 2015 06: 58
      Russia does not care about these sanctions))))
  12. +7
    April 14 2015 06: 55
    http://topwar.ru/uploads/images/2015/243/mpeo500.jpg
    YES Drum Concerned Us! Our response to their grizzlies is "GO ON .... !!!
  13. +5
    April 14 2015 06: 57
    it will cause serious concern

    When I find out about the concerns of the State Department, it becomes clear that everything is being done right. I would like to wish the states more worries wink
  14. +2
    April 14 2015 06: 58
    I think that after the deployment of the complexes, the Americans or Israelis will test the S-300 in action, of course not with the help of their aircraft, but with the aviation of some country of a coalition. I would like the calculations to be well trained.
  15. +1
    April 14 2015 07: 03
    Amerikosy with their concern would go to the geyropu and there would be worried and would not climb into Russia, otherwise we were frightened right away
  16. +2
    April 14 2015 07: 04
    Military cooperation with Iran is a business. Russia should benefit from the lifting of sanctions from Iran. If there is still salt in the wound, we’ll fill the USA with great pleasure. hi RS-it is possible to remove restrictions from Iran will cause fluctuations in the oil and gas market, but Russia does not forever sit on the raw material needle, we have other goods.
  17. +1
    April 14 2015 07: 06
    “We have long been voicing our concerns. (...) We do not consider it constructive, ”Harf quotes


    And ruin the country where the bombs, and where the Maidan is constructive? Correctly, we decided to supply Iran with complexes - 300. It was necessary for the first time to deliver them and not look at the Americans, what they would say and how they would attend.
  18. +3
    April 14 2015 07: 10
    The C-300 is a defensive weapon. Iran is our neighbor, no matter what. And if bandit gangs from the USA and England will rob or kill a neighbor, then, of course, he will need to help, and not only with the S-300 systems. And in general: "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" - the Eastern wisdom sounds.
  19. 0
    April 14 2015 07: 18
    as they say: no comment.
  20. +3
    April 14 2015 07: 23
    Well, if you are very worried, then let the Valerian drink .. soldier
  21. 0
    April 14 2015 07: 29
    “We have long been voicing our concerns. (...) We do not consider it constructive. "

    Why on earth should we do what is constructive for you ?!
  22. 0
    April 14 2015 07: 32
    But we are not worried that the US is worried ...
    They go by the forest
  23. +1
    April 14 2015 07: 34
    what can I say ...
  24. +1
    April 14 2015 07: 36
    If Fashington is not going to bomb Iran, then he has nothing to worry about, but if he is going to, it’s right for the thief and flour.
  25. 0
    April 14 2015 07: 40
    What, it became scary? :)
    That's it.
    Now the Semites need to be afraid :)
    Gee :)
  26. 0
    April 14 2015 07: 49
    The concern of the Americans is somehow of little concern. They have recently had hemorrhoids constantly arising.
  27. +2
    April 14 2015 07: 53
    Americans put tanks in Latvia - offensive weapons we delivered defensive weapons to Tehran s300. who should have more concern. Now we need to put some kind of weapon in Syria.
  28. +2
    April 14 2015 07: 55
    "Concerned" USA !!! Of course, now it will be difficult for them to deliver their anti-bunker "miracle bomb" to the place, how not to worry about it! And then they experienced, frightened, and then a bummer!
  29. 0
    April 14 2015 08: 01
    Yeah, the whole world should be worried that the Americans stick their nose wherever possible and impossible and everywhere try to light a fire of war.
  30. +1
    April 14 2015 08: 03
    I'm wondering what "God's chosen people" will say to this. After all, they played a significant role in signing the ban on the supply of S-300. They promised us nishtyakov, and then threw us. I wonder what will be arranged this time. And at the expense of Iran, we need to cooperate with them, because there are a lot of common enemies.
  31. wladimir
    +1
    April 14 2015 08: 10
    Anxious, always anxious. And you yourself do not meddle where they ask!
  32. 0
    April 14 2015 08: 23
    I don't give a damn about their "concern" The main thing is that the Iranians have trained, motivated personnel at these complexes and then there will be a result.
  33. 0
    April 14 2015 08: 23
    This, the striped devils, is just the beginning ... The Topol is expected to be shipped by air ...
  34. 0
    April 14 2015 08: 26
    Quote: Alex_Rarog
    and schizophrenia with a persecution mania is not far away.

    So let them have a head and it hurts they have the same square, or maybe two, as in this case you will not touch.
  35. 0
    April 14 2015 08: 29
    If Iran has these complexes, then they will not be able to bring Dermocracy to them on its wings. How so??? Ay Yaya Russia. A whole nation will disappear without vaunted Amerzikan freedom
  36. 0
    April 14 2015 08: 31
    It was high time to put the S-300, otherwise everyone was creeping under colleagues and friends! All the same, sanctions raked to the ears! Although the great benefit came of it ...
  37. 0
    April 14 2015 08: 31
    They are afraid that they can "accidentally" plant their macaque from heaven on the ground, like a Boeing in Donbass, so to speak, according to the boomerang law
  38. 0
    April 14 2015 08: 31
    State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf said that Washington is concerned about the decision of Moscow to supply C-300 missile systems to Iran.
    Quote: sgr291158
    The concern of the Americans is somehow of little concern. They have recently had hemorrhoids constantly arising.


    And do not comb Tehran!
  39. +2
    April 14 2015 08: 35
    Look at this from the other side: mattresses reserve the right to forcefully solve the problem of developing Persian nuclear weapons. S-300 are designed to cover nuclear facilities. Thus - we will indirectly help the Persians to bring their program of creating nuclear weapons to mind. Let's chew on snot about Russian-Iranian friendship.
    1. Gur
      +1
      April 14 2015 08: 58
      Iran has not a few other weapons, but it doesn’t throw anyone at what you took that if it has a couple of warheads, it will immediately use them the second Iranian leader directly refused to supply gas to Europe, he said in plain text that he was going to cross the road Russia and he has enough customers in place (this was at the end of that year)
      1. 0
        April 14 2015 09: 12
        Quote: Gur
        he said plainly that he was not going to cross the road of Russia

        Ah, how noble. To tears. The fact that Erdogan was going to Iran for discounts and discussion of prospects, including gas transit to Europe - it somehow does not fit into the thesis of Iran’s non-competitiveness.
        Quote: Gur
        if he has a couple of warheads he will immediately apply them

        well, let's take everyone to the nuclear club. Xoxlov are the same. Let a "couple of warheads" allow themselves, what is there. They will not use it.
  40. 0
    April 14 2015 08: 48
    it will cause serious concern, potentially sanction concern, ”Ernest emphasized.


    If it will bother you much, let them take Purgen - everything will be completely removed. The sanctions have been bothering us for a long time and nothing - immunity only rises from infection from the west.
  41. 0
    April 14 2015 08: 51
    US concern .... of course now their UAVs will not be able to fly with impunity
  42. 3vs
    0
    April 14 2015 09: 08
    "US fears are based on Iran's 'destabilizing actions in the region', in particular in Yemen."
    An interesting formulation of the question - Yemen is bombed by the Saudis and Iran is "destabilized".
    1. +1
      April 14 2015 09: 23
      Quote: 3vs
      An interesting formulation of the question - Yemen is bombed by the Saudis, and Iran is "destabilizing"

      nothing interesting. The Shiite movement is inspired by Iran.
  43. +1
    April 14 2015 09: 31
    Letting go, they strain and once again think that in which case they will have to face a serious problem in the airspace. The main thing is that Iran competently uses the S-300 and does not allow the states to feel impunity. We could still help Syria, otherwise the situation there got complicated soldier
  44. 0
    April 14 2015 09: 46
    Quote: Wend
    And you have to fly the Poles and other gaskets laughing

    To do this, they will quickly take xoxlostan to the associated MEMBERS (temporarily) lol
  45. bossynok
    0
    April 14 2015 09: 53
    Where it’s interesting to attach this thing now)))
  46. 0
    April 14 2015 10: 11
    Damn mattresses, our concern about your missile defense system in the geyrope does not bother you? Here we are too! Rub into your stripes and rub them!
  47. 0
    April 14 2015 10: 32
    Concerned is good.
  48. 0
    April 14 2015 10: 41
    There was no doubt that they would "rattle." Either it’s "open skies" for Israel and everyone else, but it’s a 100% opportunity to rake on approach to the border, and not one car at a time.
    Sounds intriguing:
    "Washington is considering the possibility of imposing unilateral sanctions against the Russian Federation in the event of the delivery of Russian goods to Tehran in exchange for oil." again the pennies have seen this UN far away and are sending it in a certain direction. That's the whole post-war global security structure.
    You can, of course, pull the bear by the mustache. It’s possible to do this for some time, but it seems very tired of the bear .....
  49. 0
    April 14 2015 10: 44
    They send instructors from around the world to the side. Distraught generals suggest killing Russians. But Russia is provoking concern. Well, Israel. Prezik refused to go. Correctly, it's not their Russian soldier who got it out of the furnaces. So get it.
  50. 0
    April 14 2015 12: 45
    Whoever got out of the ovens there. Stop grabbing stories about the stove. Jews of the Germans bred grandmother, for how many years a freebie to Israel. And the article sucks
  51. 0
    April 14 2015 14: 24
    And we will express our deep pox...zm about their concerns laughing .
  52. 0
    April 14 2015 18: 43
    "Sho, again?!" - We should express “concern” in response to the “concerns” of the amers. Diplomacy (it!) must be observed...
  53. 0
    April 15 2015 10: 08
    Washington is considering the possibility of introducing unilateral sanctions against the Russian Federation in the event of Russian goods being supplied to Tehran in exchange for oil.
  54. Ural45
    0
    April 15 2015 18: 29
    “...this will cause serious concern, potentially sanctions concern,” Ernest emphasized.” It’s like how it works with Honduras, you don’t scratch it too much and it won’t bother you.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"