Military Review

US Department of State: Washington is concerned about Moscow’s decision to supply C-300 complexes to Iran

97
State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf said that Washington is concerned about Moscow’s decision to supply of C-300 missile systems to Iran.

US Department of State: Washington is concerned about Moscow’s decision to supply C-300 complexes to Iran


“We have long expressed our concerns. (...) We do not consider this constructive, ”Harf RIA quotes "News".

The representative of the State Department noted that "US Secretary of State John Kerry raised this issue in today's conversation with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov."

According to her, the US concerns are based on Iran’s “destabilizing actions in the region,” particularly in Yemen.

Newspaper "Sight" also notes that White House press secretary Josh Ernest said that Washington is considering the possibility of imposing unilateral sanctions against the Russian Federation in the case of supplying Tehran with Russian goods in exchange for oil.

“We are, of course, aware of the proposals, which essentially consist in the barter supply of Iranian oil in exchange for Russian goods. We study the details. And if this kind of agreement moves forward, it will cause serious concern, potentially sanctions concern, ”Ernest stressed.

At the same time, he noted that the situation with the barter agreement is “different from” the situation with the possible delivery of Russian C-300 anti-aircraft missile systems to Iran.
Photos used:
http://ria.ru/
97 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 April 14 2015 06: 33
    +52
    The Americans could say bluntly - in the event we have a desire to bomb Iran, we will encounter certain difficulties. And then:

    “We have long been voicing our concerns. (...) We do not consider it constructive. "
    1. science fiction writer
      science fiction writer April 14 2015 06: 38
      +32
      State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf said that Washington is concerned about the decision of Moscow to supply C-300 missile systems to Iran.

      I would be speechless if you, the striped devils, were not worried.
      1. Simon
        Simon April 14 2015 07: 21
        +15
        It is necessary to put C-300 faster to Iran, then we will have another ally on the southern borders. And the embargo is not scary for us, we have shown it to the whole world. It makes our state only stronger and independent of the USA and European states. tongue
        1. Sergey Vl.
          Sergey Vl. April 14 2015 07: 57
          +1
          Staffers do not want Iran to be supplied with S-300. They don’t want, so let them not deliver. And we somehow quietly across the Caspian Sea, but through the mountains ...
        2. 23 region
          23 region April 14 2015 08: 15
          +2
          Enemies of a common enemy are sometimes not quite friends.
          1. tracker
            tracker April 14 2015 11: 41
            +2
            I agree that Iran is not our friend at all, but a partner in the fight against the states, and it is extremely useful to supply the S-300. in 2010 Medvedev merged the deal under pressure from "smoked" and he also leaked Libya. Our ships were already in ports ready to unload military equipment, but Dima did not give the order to unload, as a result, the country plunged into chaos and practically ceased to exist
        3. The comment was deleted.
        4. U-47
          U-47 April 14 2015 08: 30
          +6
          Quote: Simon
          It is necessary to put the S-300 faster to Iran, then we will have another ally on the southern borders.

          Yes, give up. What are allies? S-300 is needed for the protection of nuclear facilities in which case. The fact that the Persians will have nuclear weapons is a matter of time. We are being squeezed out of the European energy market, intending to give our niche to the Persians., Turkmens and Azerbaijanis, and you are talking about some allies. Holy simplicity.
        5. NEXUS
          NEXUS April 14 2015 09: 04
          0
          Quote: Simon
          It is necessary to put C-300 faster to Iran, then we will have another ally on the southern borders. And the embargo is not scary for us, we have shown it to the whole world. It makes our state only stronger and independent of the USA and European states. tongue

          and supply to all allies angry That’s why the Americans are already going to make 6 pipelats of the first generation without finishing Lightning. To close the sky for the flights of their vaunted Raptor with B-2 ... still bastions there to block the strait
        6. skeket
          skeket April 14 2015 09: 14
          0
          Quote: Simon
          It is necessary to put the S-300 faster to Iran

          and Syria
          1. U-47
            U-47 April 14 2015 09: 25
            -1
            Quote: skeket
            Quote: Simon
            It is necessary to put the S-300 faster to Iran

            and Syria

            and Syria S-300 on a fig? Is she constantly bombed?
      2. Alex_Rarog
        Alex_Rarog April 14 2015 07: 49
        +2
        Yes, no matter how you look, they are always worried about something. That is the teachings of Ukraine! Now, even with the contacts of the Russian Federation with Iran, schizophrenia with the mania of investigation is not far away.
        1. insafufa
          insafufa April 14 2015 08: 10
          +1
          Keep it up for a long time was Medvedev's disgrace to correct
      3. crumb
        crumb April 14 2015 07: 51
        +1
        But Moscow is somehow not worried that Washington is worried!
      4. Eugene-Eugene
        Eugene-Eugene April 14 2015 08: 16
        +1
        I would have lost the power of speech if you, devils striped, did not bother

        Powerfully
        1. Deniska
          Deniska April 14 2015 09: 08
          0
          Eugene-Eugene


          I wanted to put + but Lyashko on the avarque ...
          1. Eugene-Eugene
            Eugene-Eugene April 14 2015 10: 29
            +1
            Okay, I will think, what to replace, since they do not understand my humor (you are not the first to speak out on this subject)
            1. insafufa
              insafufa April 14 2015 11: 10
              +1
              Quote: Eugene-Eugene
              Okay, I will think, what to replace, since they do not understand my humor (you are not the first to speak out on this subject)

              Humor is understandable only to lyashko shatters very much
          2. Manul
            Manul April 14 2015 12: 56
            0
            Quote: Deniska
            I wanted to put + but Lyashko on the avarque ...

            Similarly))) Now, plus.
      5. Kent0001
        Kent0001 April 14 2015 09: 19
        +1
        And the states are worried about us. We are a sovereign state and make our own decisions.
        1. tracker
          tracker April 14 2015 11: 43
          0
          sovereignty is far away, while there are more enemies inside than outside
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Imperialkolorad
      Imperialkolorad April 14 2015 06: 40
      +6
      So the United States has now begun to kiss Iran almost in a hickey. What's wrong again?
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov April 14 2015 06: 45
        +8
        Quote: ImperialKolorad
        So the United States has now begun to kiss Iran almost in a hickey. What's wrong again?

        Yes, no one kisses there - this is the appearance of the world. Israel is still pondering what to say about this. To say or immediately to fuck at the complexes when they arrive there.
        Then again, Russia can be blamed, such as the Russians provoked a conflict by putting complexes.
        1. hedgehog in the fog
          hedgehog in the fog April 14 2015 06: 50
          +2
          pisayutsa mattresses smile
          their force intervention rushed to zero
        2. U-47
          U-47 April 14 2015 08: 53
          +2
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          Israel is still considering what to say about this.

          What do the Jews say? The states have cooled to them, so the matter of saving the drowning, etc. according to the text. They will agree with the Saudis on the corridor and bomb off nuclear facilities if it gets hotter. These notorious objects are numerous and scattered throughout Iran, so the only thing they will achieve is to push Iran’s nuclear weapons program five to ten years back. A mess will be necessary. And here we are in the exaltation of the Persians in the allies recorded. Laugh.
        3. skeket
          skeket April 14 2015 09: 12
          0
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          Israel is still pondering what to say about this. To say or immediately to hammer at the complexes when they arrive there.
          Then again, Russia can be blamed, such as the Russians provoked a conflict by putting complexes.

          So the S-300 is for defense, not for attack) Do not fly brazenly over Iranian territory, but do not throw bombs and missiles at it, and you won’t have to worry.
      2. Foxmara
        Foxmara April 14 2015 07: 18
        +5
        immediately after the negotiations, they tested an anti-bunker bomb for those who do not believe in the triumph of democracy. But since a real plane must carry the bomb, then Iran’s S-300 is of concern in the white house feel
        1. tracker
          tracker April 14 2015 11: 46
          0
          just to the point, it was in response to the tests of the anti-bunker bomb that the GDP suddenly decided to put the S-300
      3. ibu355yandex.ru
        ibu355yandex.ru April 14 2015 08: 27
        0
        So they climbed out to kiss, and there already the ass of Russia to meet them ...
      4. The comment was deleted.
    4. rpek32
      rpek32 April 14 2015 06: 43
      +1
      “We have long been voicing our concerns. (...) We do not consider it constructive. "

      As the saying goes:
      Clear.
      1. Dembel77
        Dembel77 April 14 2015 06: 58
        0
        And what is there to worry the State Department about Iran, they would ... and better about the unconstitutional coup in Ukraine, they were so worried.
        The contract for the supply of Russian S-300 systems to Iran was signed at the end of 2007. Official sources did not name its exact cost, but the media wrote that Russia was supposed to supply Tehran with five divisions of the S-300PMU-1 anti-aircraft missile system (SAM) for a total of about $ 800 million. The United States and Israel tried to hinder the implementation of the contract.
        In June 2010, the UN Security Council adopted resolution 1929, imposing restrictions on the supply of conventional weapons to Iran, including missiles and missile systems, tanks, attack helicopters, combat aircraft, and ships. On September 22, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev signed a decree prohibiting the implementation of a UN Security Council resolution of the delivery to Iran of S-300 air defense systems or materiel related to them, including spare parts.
        Iran reacted with indignation at Russia's decision to withdraw from the contract. Iranian Defense Minister General Ahmad Vahidi then said that Russia humiliates itself, following the lead of the international community on this issue. Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was even more harsh: he said, hinting at the United States that Russia had abandoned the contract "under the influence of Satan." Tehran threatened the Russian Federation with a court and stated that soon Iran would develop air defense systems that would significantly surpass the outdated S-300 in terms of their parameters.
        1. Saratoga833
          Saratoga833 April 14 2015 07: 12
          0
          Quote: Dembel 77
          President of Russia Dmitry Medvedev

          This iPhone has done a lot of troubles, being at the helm. And for some reason, it is still found in large leaders. Is he irreplaceable ???
          1. Terrible ensign
            Terrible ensign April 14 2015 08: 23
            0
            VVP, just keeps his word ... Ayfosha was promised the prime minister’s chair for the period from 12 to 18 years. And the president keeps his promises, especially public ones. I hope for the second term his promises did not extend.
          2. Cube123
            Cube123 April 14 2015 08: 42
            +1
            First of all, all strategically important directions have been deduced from under it.
            Secondly, are you not considering the option "beautiful" girlfriend + "scary" girlfriend?
          3. The comment was deleted.
          4. tracker
            tracker April 14 2015 11: 48
            0
            it’s too early ... FSE is under control
        2. 23 region
          23 region April 14 2015 08: 44
          +1
          Quote: Dembel 77
          And what is the State Department worrying about Iran

          1. A barter deal with Iran "oil for goods" is already underway. "Barter is carried out in exchange for supplies of Iranian crude oil, and we supply certain types of products," Ryabkov said.
          2. One of the largest US and world banks Morgan Stanley said that he had sold the Russian oil company Rosneft, a division involved in the sale of oil, as well as its storage and transportation. The financial side of the transaction was not disclosed. (Rosneft will receive, in the framework of the transaction, in particular, a 49% stake in Heidmar Holdings LLC, which manages a fleet of about 100 tankers).
          3. The project of the Asian Oil and Gas Exchange, where hydrocarbons will be traded for a "basket of local currencies", and not for the dollar, gaining control over such a volume of oil (and, in the future, gas) is a step that brings Russia and its allies very close to breaking the "petrodollar needles ", in which" Koscheeva's death "of our overseas haters.
          4. Moscow’s decision to supply S-300 missile systems to Iran.
          Add 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 and ...
          So America howled. Hopes to tame Iran were covered with a copper basin, along with the prospects to annoy the Russian Federation. (+ Violently offended European lobby + rabid sheikhs).
        3. The comment was deleted.
      2. samoletil18
        samoletil18 April 14 2015 10: 13
        0
        Bon Appetit!
    5. Sergey S.
      Sergey S. April 14 2015 06: 55
      +9
      State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf said that Washington is concerned about the decision of Moscow to supply C-300 missile systems to Iran.

      And we are worried.
      If war begins on our southern borders, we have nowhere to go: refugees, humanitarian aid, compassion for the humiliated and offended ...
      And so, they might beware of bombing ...
      So, if the amers do not like, then done right!
    6. Момент
      Момент April 14 2015 06: 57
      +4
      Of course, they are worried, because the invasion of Iran can become a big problem for America.
      1. Simon
        Simon April 14 2015 07: 23
        0
        This is Russia's concern at hand!
    7. sanja.grw
      sanja.grw April 14 2015 07: 15
      +1
      Sassali Americans, do not lurk on Iran from the air to watch
    8. Dreiko11
      Dreiko11 April 14 2015 07: 22
      0
      it’s precisely they who are afraid that their attacks will be inconclusive, not only that, and not small
    9. vodolaz
      vodolaz April 14 2015 07: 25
      0
      They are properly worried, because they cannot fly with impunity.
    10. 222222
      222222 April 14 2015 08: 08
      +1
      Distance between Tehran, Iran and Seattle, Washington, USA. 10744 km = 6676 miles.
      The firing range of the s-300 complexes .. ".. from several kilometers - up to 150, 200, 300 kilometers, depending on the type of elements of the S-300 family used and, in particular, interceptor missiles" ..
      so that the Yankees breathe deeper and sleep soundly .. and take care of your nervous system ..
    11. RPG_
      RPG_ April 14 2015 08: 46
      0
      The language of diplomacy. Some sys know how to use it, which means that is exactly what you wrote.
    12. igor.borov775
      igor.borov775 April 14 2015 09: 24
      0
      Quote: rotmistr60
      We have long been voicing our concerns. (...) We do not consider it constructive. "

      Hi, why did they speak directly? The Jews will be the first to go and they have long worked out the options. struggle with this system. They have long been trained in tandem with the S-300. Any system has its own peculiarities, which is why it has another system with it that eliminates the enemy’s breakthrough windows .. And the enemy will never act at random. The weakest link in the most complicated systems people. Faith in their weapons depends a lot on their skills and courage. And Iran is a weak country. The economy is struggling to cope with the problems that arise. Sanctions are hitting the economy and the whole country and the population especially .. And this is not a year, not two, but decades. The technological lag is growing. The United States is well aware of this and clearly speculates on it. The Yankees will never allow the growth of Tehran's economy. There should be only one reign in the region, and this is TEL AVIV. Tehran itself aspires to the SCO and to EURASES. Our experts in the East are rushing about rumors about Tehran’s Muslim danger. And the Yankees are echoing them yes and yes. I have always wondered how wise men can frighten everyone. What’s interesting is they in this country, but they say disgusting. Why our experts that work of a completely different opinion. I have long been concerned about the question, and if at their own expense they will be worn there, the opinion will be different. For me, the authorities in these countries have long been Academician Primakov, Satanovsky. But our liberal media do not like them. And many have a vague idea of ​​Iran itself. In general, our valiant ORT, Russia-24 are completely silent about these countries, but everyone knows that occurs in the EU. A very strange policy of these channels. In the information age and nothing about Armenia, Azerbaijan, Iran. And the United States is taking full advantage of the possibility of lifting sanctions, linking along the way many problems for itself and its best friend there. Hence all these overt threats. Teheran wave their fingers saying they shouldn't go anywhere, otherwise everything will remain as it is. Although Tehran has almost nothing to do with Yemen. They expressed their position to the Yankis. The famous Whip and Gingerbread Man.
      1. Vend
        Vend April 14 2015 09: 39
        +2
        We have long been voicing our concerns. (...) We do not consider it constructive

        Earlier it was necessary to think when sanctions introduced and started Russophobic hysteria. Now take a sip in full. Just like that now it will not be possible to bomb. Mattresses will not fly on such a task, you will have to send other NATO MEMBERS. Although I think the Germans will not start airplanes again, and the rest will come up with something. And you have to fly to the Poles and other gaskets laughing
    13. GSH-18
      GSH-18 April 14 2015 09: 40
      0
      Quote: rotmistr60
      The Americans could say bluntly - in the event we have a desire to bomb Iran, we will encounter certain difficulties. And then:

      “We have long been voicing our concerns. (...) We do not consider it constructive. "

      Okay states, look how much screech came from Israel! They just talked about the possible lifting of sanctions! And what will happen after the delivery of the S-300? Air defense deprives potential aggressors of the ability to use aviation. And the use of ground operations is fraught with large casualties of the attacking side, which is unacceptable in advance request
    14. Shirioner
      Shirioner April 14 2015 10: 15
      -1
      There will be no supplies of S-300 to Iran. This topic is used as a lever of pressure on America in order to prevent the supply of lethal weapons to Ukraine. As a result, they will come to an agreement: blocking the supply of arms to Ukraine in exchange for not supplying arms to Iran
      1. tracker
        tracker April 14 2015 11: 53
        0
        there will be other measures regarding arms deliveries, the S-300 to Iran is a lever of pressure in the Middle East
  2. rafaelich
    rafaelich April 14 2015 06: 33
    +3
    The dog barks, the caravan goes ... ©
  3. venzim
    venzim April 14 2015 06: 33
    +11
    The process is underway, the "partners" are losing influence and control over the situation every day, therefore they are concerned about everything.
  4. Lukich
    Lukich April 14 2015 06: 35
    +9
    The newspaper Vzglyad also notes that White House spokesman Josh Ernest said Washington is considering introducing unilateral sanctions against Russia if Tehran is supplied with Russian goods in exchange for oil.

    they won’t get over their sanctions. like parrots
  5. Magic archer
    Magic archer April 14 2015 06: 38
    +16
    The funny thing is that the Americans are not even bothered by offensive weapons! Apparently, all the same, there are plans to attack Iran ..
    1. SSR
      SSR April 14 2015 07: 01
      +11
      Quote: Magic Archer
      The funny thing is that the Americans are not even bothered by offensive weapons! Apparently, all the same, there are plans to attack Iran ..

      Yes, it's not even funny .... ABM against Iran in Europe and Russia's concern is ridiculous, the support of terrorists by kartar and the Saudis is internationally "correct", but simply calling for a peaceful dialogue in Yemen is already a disaster. The bombing of Yemen, Donbass, Syria is "correct" and the resistance to the bombers is troubling. wassat
      Personally, my concern is the aspen stake not clogged in Fashington’s heart.
      Agree comrades that the hypocrisy of the West has long gone beyond even false modesty. ((((
  6. Sars
    Sars April 14 2015 06: 46
    +4
    Comrade Assad also needs to put the S-300 in the order of humanitarian aid.
    1. tracker
      tracker April 14 2015 11: 56
      0
      There is a signed contract, but there is no point in delivering. Russia unequivocally warned NATO members not to rock the boat and that’s enough
  7. 34 region
    34 region April 14 2015 06: 49
    +5
    eh! We would come closer to Mexico. Remind about the territory that has departed to the states. Yes, and maybe put rackets. well, or at least publicly give a hint about it. I wonder what then will be the urination of Sir Washington?
    1. satris
      satris April 14 2015 06: 55
      +4
      To begin with, conclude an agreement with Mexico on military cooperation, the exchange of delegations, that is, on trifles ... Training is free for them to provide - on some types of armed forces. Well, then ...
      1. demon184
        demon184 April 14 2015 08: 51
        +2
        And it would not hurt to declare a free trade zone with a customs union with subsequent accession and a military union.
  8. kostyan77708
    kostyan77708 April 14 2015 06: 51
    +2
    Yes, let them enter, just send them and trade as they traded ... this will be an example to them and a kick in the ass!
    1. meriem1
      meriem1 April 14 2015 06: 56
      +3
      100% accurate !!! Potentially, Iran’s arms market is 30 mdv. If not we, soon someone else. So let the sanctions scare.
  9. kot28.ru
    kot28.ru April 14 2015 06: 51
    +8
    Quote: fiction
    State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf said that Washington is concerned about the decision of Moscow to supply C-300 missile systems to Iran.

    I would be speechless if you, the striped devils, were not worried.

    clickable! good
    1. yllo
      yllo April 14 2015 08: 58
      +1
      dude, this is an offset good
  10. RusDV
    RusDV April 14 2015 06: 51
    +1
    US concerns are based on “Iran’s destabilizing actions in the region”

    These are impudent "fears" .... The states held negotiations with Iran, agreed on nuclear issues, reached an agreement on lifting the sanctions, and on you .... suddenly they became "destabilizing" .... Maybe it is, but why states with such a bad Iran to establish relations and cooperation ...? Ah-ah ... well, yes ... they, like others, cannot cooperate with Russia ...
  11. spech
    spech April 14 2015 06: 54
    +3
    Washington is considering introducing unilateral sanctions against Russia
    1. pasha24
      pasha24 April 14 2015 06: 58
      +1
      Russia does not care about these sanctions))))
  12. holod19
    holod19 April 14 2015 06: 55
    +7
    http://topwar.ru/uploads/images/2015/243/mpeo500.jpg
    YES Drum Concerned Us! Our response to their grizzlies is "GO ON .... !!!
  13. pvv113
    pvv113 April 14 2015 06: 57
    +5
    it will cause serious concern

    When I find out about the concerns of the State Department, it becomes clear that everything is being done right. I would like to wish the states more worries wink
  14. forester
    forester April 14 2015 06: 58
    +2
    I think that after the deployment of the complexes, the Americans or Israelis will test the S-300 in action, of course not with the help of their aircraft, but with the aviation of some country of a coalition. I would like the calculations to be well trained.
  15. f, hfrjlf, hf
    f, hfrjlf, hf April 14 2015 07: 03
    +1
    Amerikosy with their concern would go to the geyropu and there would be worried and would not climb into Russia, otherwise we were frightened right away
  16. fa2998
    fa2998 April 14 2015 07: 04
    +2
    Military cooperation with Iran is a business. Russia should benefit from the lifting of sanctions from Iran. If there is still salt in the wound, we’ll fill the USA with great pleasure. hi RS-it is possible to remove restrictions from Iran will cause fluctuations in the oil and gas market, but Russia does not forever sit on the raw material needle, we have other goods.
  17. Afinogen
    Afinogen April 14 2015 07: 06
    +1
    “We have long been voicing our concerns. (...) We do not consider it constructive, ”Harf quotes


    And ruin the country where the bombs, and where the Maidan is constructive? Correctly, we decided to supply Iran with complexes - 300. It was necessary for the first time to deliver them and not look at the Americans, what they would say and how they would attend.
  18. 1536
    1536 April 14 2015 07: 10
    +3
    The C-300 is a defensive weapon. Iran is our neighbor, no matter what. And if bandit gangs from the USA and England will rob or kill a neighbor, then, of course, he will need to help, and not only with the S-300 systems. And in general: "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" - the Eastern wisdom sounds.
  19. kerosene
    kerosene April 14 2015 07: 18
    0
    as they say: no comment.
  20. novel68rus
    novel68rus April 14 2015 07: 23
    +3
    Well, if you are very worried, then let the Valerian drink .. soldier
  21. Tatar 174
    Tatar 174 April 14 2015 07: 29
    0
    “We have long been voicing our concerns. (...) We do not consider it constructive. "

    Why on earth should we do what is constructive for you ?!
  22. Nyrobsky
    Nyrobsky April 14 2015 07: 32
    0
    But we are not worried that the US is worried ...
    They go by the forest
  23. fomkin
    fomkin April 14 2015 07: 34
    +1
    what can I say ...
  24. Corsair5912
    Corsair5912 April 14 2015 07: 36
    +1
    If Fashington is not going to bomb Iran, then he has nothing to worry about, but if he is going to, it’s right for the thief and flour.
  25. Alcoholic
    Alcoholic April 14 2015 07: 40
    0
    What, it became scary? :)
    That's it.
    Now the Semites need to be afraid :)
    Gee :)
  26. sgr291158
    sgr291158 April 14 2015 07: 49
    0
    The concern of the Americans is somehow of little concern. They have recently had hemorrhoids constantly arising.
  27. Diviz
    Diviz April 14 2015 07: 53
    +2
    Americans put tanks in Latvia - offensive weapons we delivered defensive weapons to Tehran s300. who should have more concern. Now we need to put some kind of weapon in Syria.
  28. chaldon
    chaldon April 14 2015 07: 55
    +2
    "Concerned" USA !!! Of course, now it will be difficult for them to deliver their anti-bunker "miracle bomb" to the place, how not to worry about it! And then they experienced, frightened, and then a bummer!
  29. Lyton
    Lyton April 14 2015 08: 01
    0
    Yeah, the whole world should be worried that the Americans stick their nose wherever possible and impossible and everywhere try to light a fire of war.
  30. Zomanus
    Zomanus April 14 2015 08: 03
    +1
    I'm wondering what "God's chosen people" will say to this. After all, they played a significant role in signing the ban on the supply of S-300. They promised us nishtyakov, and then threw us. I wonder what will be arranged this time. And at the expense of Iran, we need to cooperate with them, because there are a lot of common enemies.
  31. wladimir
    wladimir April 14 2015 08: 10
    +1
    Anxious, always anxious. And you yourself do not meddle where they ask!
  32. avl01
    avl01 April 14 2015 08: 23
    0
    I don't give a damn about their "concern" The main thing is that the Iranians have trained, motivated personnel at these complexes and then there will be a result.
  33. Abbra
    Abbra April 14 2015 08: 23
    0
    This, the striped devils, is just the beginning ... The Topol is expected to be shipped by air ...
  34. Masters
    Masters April 14 2015 08: 26
    0
    Quote: Alex_Rarog
    and schizophrenia with a persecution mania is not far away.

    So let them have a head and it hurts they have the same square, or maybe two, as in this case you will not touch.
  35. kvampaku
    kvampaku April 14 2015 08: 29
    0
    If Iran has these complexes, then they will not be able to bring Dermocracy to them on its wings. How so??? Ay Yaya Russia. A whole nation will disappear without vaunted Amerzikan freedom
  36. ibu355yandex.ru
    ibu355yandex.ru April 14 2015 08: 31
    0
    It was high time to put the S-300, otherwise everyone was creeping under colleagues and friends! All the same, sanctions raked to the ears! Although the great benefit came of it ...
  37. Gray 43
    Gray 43 April 14 2015 08: 31
    0
    They are afraid that they can "accidentally" plant their macaque from heaven on the ground, like a Boeing in Donbass, so to speak, according to the boomerang law
  38. rus-5819
    rus-5819 April 14 2015 08: 31
    0
    State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf said that Washington is concerned about the decision of Moscow to supply C-300 missile systems to Iran.
    Quote: sgr291158
    The concern of the Americans is somehow of little concern. They have recently had hemorrhoids constantly arising.


    And do not comb Tehran!
  39. U-47
    U-47 April 14 2015 08: 35
    +2
    Look at this from the other side: mattresses reserve the right to forcefully solve the problem of developing Persian nuclear weapons. S-300 are designed to cover nuclear facilities. Thus - we will indirectly help the Persians to bring their program of creating nuclear weapons to mind. Let's chew on snot about Russian-Iranian friendship.
    1. Gur
      Gur April 14 2015 08: 58
      +1
      Iran has not a few other weapons, but it doesn’t throw anyone at what you took that if it has a couple of warheads, it will immediately use them the second Iranian leader directly refused to supply gas to Europe, he said in plain text that he was going to cross the road Russia and he has enough customers in place (this was at the end of that year)
      1. U-47
        U-47 April 14 2015 09: 12
        0
        Quote: Gur
        he said plainly that he was not going to cross the road of Russia

        Ah, how noble. To tears. The fact that Erdogan was going to Iran for discounts and discussion of prospects, including gas transit to Europe - it somehow does not fit into the thesis of Iran’s non-competitiveness.
        Quote: Gur
        if he has a couple of warheads he will immediately apply them

        well, let's take everyone to the nuclear club. Xoxlov are the same. Let a "couple of warheads" allow themselves, what is there. They will not use it.
  40. Enoch
    Enoch April 14 2015 08: 48
    0
    it will cause serious concern, potentially sanction concern, ”Ernest emphasized.


    If it will bother you much, let them take Purgen - everything will be completely removed. The sanctions have been bothering us for a long time and nothing - immunity only rises from infection from the west.
  41. vkl-47
    vkl-47 April 14 2015 08: 51
    0
    US concern .... of course now their UAVs will not be able to fly with impunity
  42. 3vs
    3vs April 14 2015 09: 08
    0
    "US fears are based on Iran's 'destabilizing actions in the region', in particular in Yemen."
    An interesting formulation of the question - Yemen is bombed by the Saudis and Iran is "destabilized".
    1. U-47
      U-47 April 14 2015 09: 23
      +1
      Quote: 3vs
      An interesting formulation of the question - Yemen is bombed by the Saudis, and Iran is "destabilizing"

      nothing interesting. The Shiite movement is inspired by Iran.
  43. Alexey-74
    Alexey-74 April 14 2015 09: 31
    +1
    Letting go, they strain and once again think that in which case they will have to face a serious problem in the airspace. The main thing is that Iran competently uses the S-300 and does not allow the states to feel impunity. We could still help Syria, otherwise the situation there got complicated soldier
  44. GSH-18
    GSH-18 April 14 2015 09: 46
    0
    Quote: Wend
    And you have to fly the Poles and other gaskets laughing

    To do this, they will quickly take xoxlostan to the associated MEMBERS (temporarily) lol
  45. bossynok
    bossynok April 14 2015 09: 53
    0
    Where it’s interesting to attach this thing now)))
  46. koksalek
    koksalek April 14 2015 10: 11
    0
    Damn mattresses, our concern about your missile defense system in the geyrope does not bother you? Here we are too! Rub into your stripes and rub them!
  47. atamankko
    atamankko April 14 2015 10: 32
    0
    Concerned is good.
  48. evm-2005
    evm-2005 April 14 2015 10: 41
    0
    There was no doubt that they would "rattle." Either it’s "open skies" for Israel and everyone else, but it’s a 100% opportunity to rake on approach to the border, and not one car at a time.
    Sounds intriguing:
    "Washington is considering the possibility of imposing unilateral sanctions against the Russian Federation in the event of the delivery of Russian goods to Tehran in exchange for oil." again the pennies have seen this UN far away and are sending it in a certain direction. That's the whole post-war global security structure.
    You can, of course, pull the bear by the mustache. It’s possible to do this for some time, but it seems very tired of the bear .....
  49. sieras
    sieras April 14 2015 10: 44
    0
    They send instructors from around the world to the side. Distraught generals suggest killing Russians. But Russia is provoking concern. Well, Israel. Prezik refused to go. Correctly, it's not their Russian soldier who got it out of the furnaces. So get it.
  50. Support
    Support April 14 2015 12: 45
    0
    Whoever got out of the ovens there. Stop grabbing stories about the stove. Jews of the Germans bred grandmother, for how many years a freebie to Israel. And the article sucks