Military Review

Madame "Wow" dreams of a throne

Madame "Wow" dreams of a throne

This episode has already entered history as a vivid example of how low a politician of international importance can fall today. October 20 2011, on the mobile phone of Hillary Clinton, who was then US Secretary of State, received footage of the brutal murder of the Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi and his son Mutassim. This woman, I may say so, laughed and enthusiastically shouted “Wow!”

Two thousand years ago, the biblical Herodias, the Queen of the Jews, was also rejoiced when her daughter Salome presented the severed head of John the Baptist on a dish. But at one time Hillary met with Mutassim Gaddafi, shook his hand, and then on her face shone the same smile.

“They came, they saw, he died,” Clinton said then, either trying to joke, or seriously imitating the Roman emperor Caesar. True, the victory over the Libyan Jamahiriya was given to the United States and its NATO allies is not so easy as Caesar in the battle of Zela. The United States did not “come, see, win” at all, and before that, during the 7 months, Libya was subjected to barbaric bombardments, sparing no one on its way.

Then the scandal associated with further events in Libya, largely forced the frantic Hillary to leave the post of US Secretary of State. The “Democratic rebels,” who were so vehemently supported by Washington, killed in the city of Benghazi, American diplomat Christopher Stevens and several other employees of the American consulate. Then it became known that shortly before his death Stevens appealed to Clinton with a request to strengthen the security of the building of the consulate, but was refused. Madam Secretary of State did not want to think badly about these very Libyan "rebels". In American society and political circles, she was very strongly condemned for the incident, and soon after that, at the beginning of 2013, she had to resign.

Along with the same Christopher Stevens, Clinton with might and main supported another “democratic rebels” in Syria. According to US Senator Rand Paul, Stevens coordinated the supply of weapons to terrorists operating against the SAR, and also participated in the recruitment of "Syrian opposition" militants. And a week before his murder, Stevens, with the knowledge of Clinton, was involved in sending a ship from Libya with a huge party weapons for the anti-Syrian rebels.

Now Madame Madden is aiming even higher - for the US presidency. He wants to run for the Democratic Party and spend a record amount on his campaign - 2,5 billion dollars. Republican competitors immediately after her announcement began the Stop Clinton campaign.

Earlier, in the fall of 2007, Hillary had already tried to participate in the presidential race, but from the Democrats to the highest position went Barack Obama. Now that the latter’s second term is ending, there are many chances that it is the former US Secretary of State who will become the candidate of the Democratic Party.

Even as the first lady of the United States during the presidency of Bill Clinton, Hillary has established herself as a very ambitious and overbearing lady. She played a significant role in politics. Her husband was particularly distinguished by the scandal with Monika Lewinsky, and, in order to hush up uncomfortable voices in the press, he began the monstrous bombardment of Yugoslavia.

Hillary as state secretary confirmed the saying “Husband and wife are one Satan”. If Barack Obama was not eager to get into the Libyan conflict, then Clinton turned out to be a “war hawk” and did everything in her power to push the decision on military aggression against Tripoli.

Then Madame Clinton took a tougher position than Obama regarding military intervention in the internal affairs of Syria. She insisted on increasing the support of Syrian terrorists (who already received quite a lot of so-called “non-lethal” assistance). In this regard, it is closely intertwined with Democratic opponents - Republicans.

Yes, and with respect to Russia, the ex-Secretary of State takes a frankly hostile policy. Back in the distant 2008 year, when there were no current sanctions and confrontation between the US and the Russian Federation over Ukraine, Clinton responded to George W. Bush’s statement: “I looked into Putin’s eyes and saw in them a soul.” “He was a member of the KGB and, by definition, he has no soul,” Hillary said. (You can relate differently to V.Putin. But do American officials, without a twinge of conscience, have the ability to “bomb into the stone age” any small country that they did not like and did not please them?)

Wanting to reward Clinton for the hatred of Russia, former Georgian President Mikhail Saakashvili even presented her with a Georgian passport, so she is now a citizen of Georgia. And she also has a much tougher rhetoric than Obama’s against Iran. And she zealously in favor of delivering weapons to the junta Poroshenko, so that he killed even more people in the Donbas.

A likely candidate for future presidents from the US Republican Party, the son of 41 and the younger brother of 43 President of the USA, Jeb Bush, was also named. But the same US in its propaganda actively condemned the Syrian president only because he was the son of the previous president of this country, Hafez Al-Assad. They were extremely unhappy that the Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi planned to transfer, after all the necessary procedures, power to his son Seif Al-Islam. Say, “dictatorial regimes”, “dynasties”, “inherited power”. Washington not only closes its eyes to the dictatorial hereditary monarchy in the ally's country - Saudi Arabia. Now, perhaps, the third person from the Bush dynasty will be in power in the USA itself (unless, of course, the “democrat” wins).

Before the presidential election in the United States another year and a half. But one thing is already clear: which of them two, Hillary Clinton or Jeb Bush, does not come to the presidential throne, we should expect a tightening of US foreign policy. Both in relation to Russia, and in relation to its allies.

Against this background, Russia's decision to lift the ban on the supply of C-300 complexes to Iran looks absolutely fair and logical. Only by strengthening our defense capability — our own and our allies, who can repel US aggression — can we survive in the world to come. At least, in order not to give such as “Madame Wow” new motives for cruel joy.

(Especially for the "Military Review")

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site:

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. anakonda
    anakonda April 15 2015 06: 31
    Hillary Clinton, unfortunately, at the moment, a real candidate for the US presidency, it could theoretically be stopped by someone from the Bush, it will be an “epic battle” wassat . I write unfortunately, since Clinton, unlike Obama, will be a very tough politician and can do a lot of trouble for the sake of his abstract democratic values.
    1. KOH
      KOH April 15 2015 09: 28
      I don’t remember the exact phrase, in my opinion, the Kennedy brothers were shot in September ... so September will help her ....
      1. jjj
        jjj April 15 2015 17: 37
        Hillary rides spectacularly.
        Photo: Charles Dharapak / AP
        1. Denis Skiff M2.0
          Denis Skiff M2.0 April 15 2015 20: 16
          Western Media: Putin Beats Obama Again
          What the hell is Obama? V.V, beat everyone behind the mediator Obamkin. And Hilary can only scream and scold and everything will be smooth
          Western media: Putin beat Hilary again
        2. Volzhanin
          Volzhanin 12 May 2015 10: 58
          It’s necessary to chop off the bitch’s hands - that’s cool! laughing
          Then I will also scream and eat ...
    2. KOH
      KOH April 15 2015 09: 28
      I don’t remember the exact phrase, in my opinion the Kennedy brothers were shot in September, the shooting of candidates seemed to always fall in September ..., so September will help her ....
      1. maxiban
        maxiban April 15 2015 09: 48
        Nothing worse than the old unsatisfied woman, offended by all men for her husband's betrayal.
        1. Vend
          Vend April 15 2015 10: 08
          This is where the heredity of "royal families" flourishes in power. laughing
        2. Serg 122
          Serg 122 April 15 2015 10: 21
          Nothing worse than the old unsatisfied woman, offended by all men for her husband's betrayal.

          There was President Bush, there was Bush Jr. What will they call their younger brother, Bush's younger? Bush Jr? And such an inadequate lady, such as Madame Clinton before the presidency must first be a psychiatrist, but not one .... fool
          1. mik667
            mik667 April 15 2015 15: 13
            Yes, the diagnosis is on the face.
          2. andrew42
            andrew42 15 June 2015 09: 27
            Mask!? Just at the weekend "Men in Black" was on TV. Every joke has its share of a joke. The masters of the States are pushing such inhumans to official posts.
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. siberalt
      siberalt April 15 2015 12: 08
      And to whom will she replace Monica Lewinsky? laughing
      1. jjj
        jjj April 15 2015 17: 23
        Quote: siberalt
        And to whom will she replace Monica Lewinsky?

        And Monica is her vice president. So be fair
    5. The comment was deleted.
    6. Maaslo Sallonen
      Maaslo Sallonen April 15 2015 13: 00
      Here is the disbelief after this in the prediction that the Antichrist is coming. Choose either of the two.
    7. igorka357
      igorka357 April 15 2015 15: 21
      Oh calm down, ardent hawks, usually when they get to the oval office, quickly change their rhetoric!
    8. pashundra
      pashundra April 15 2015 16: 11
      they write that her rating is not so high, maybe it’ll blow?
      1. Koshak
        Koshak April 15 2015 18: 14
        Quote: pashundra
        they write that her rating is not so high, maybe it’ll blow?

        Whoever comes to power there, the policy of the mattresses will not change until all of them are under the control of the Rothschilds and others like them.
  2. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 April 15 2015 06: 36
    one thing is clear: whichever of the two of them - Hillary Clinton or Jeb Bush - came to the presidential throne, we should expect a tightening of US foreign policy. Both in relation to Russia, and in relation to its allies.

    I agree with the author. Whoever becomes president, money dictates the politics of this country.
    1. GOR_XVII
      GOR_XVII April 15 2015 09: 23
      If you want a system, but you want a strike, you still get .... the president of the Russophobe. Radish horseradish is not sweeter.
      In the modern political Olympus of America, there is not a single person who is at least somehow loyal to Russia. Therefore, the confrontation with America will last for many decades, regardless of who the president will be there. I think the same for us.
  3. strelets
    strelets April 15 2015 06: 42
    I believe that in the US, the president is the same talking head as the Psaki, but of a higher rank. Who cares who runs the White House is a white old woman or a black man. It will still do what the owners say.
    1. mad
      mad April 15 2015 07: 14
      Quote: strelets
      white old woman

      and pulls to add "with a scythe"
      1. Uruska
        Uruska April 15 2015 13: 04
        Voting results at ECHO MOSCOW now (by the way)

        Would you like a person like Hillary Clinton, the US presidential candidate, to lead Russia? ("49 minutes")
        difficult to answer
        5 76 6 9996 7
        1. padded jacket
          padded jacket April 15 2015 13: 08
          Quote: Uruska
          Voting results at ECHO MOSCOW now (by the way)

          Echo of Moscow has a specific audience, mainly the so-called "fifth column".
    2. andrew42
      andrew42 15 June 2015 09: 29
      I support. Since Kennedy, the American president is not a priori negotiable figure.
  4. andruha70
    andruha70 April 15 2015 06: 46
    Madame "Wow" dreams of a throne
    it better not be there. otherwise, this d.ura, with an exclamation "Wow" - will also press the "button". fool
    1. AlNikolaich
      AlNikolaich April 15 2015 07: 46
      Quote: andruha70
      Madame "Wow" dreams of a throne
      it better not be there. otherwise, this d.ura, with an exclamation "Wow" - will also press the "button". fool

      It’s time for her to dream of the eternal ...
      Get used to the strawberry ... And she's about the throne laughing
    2. Mussasi
      Mussasi April 15 2015 08: 36
      She agrees complete fool. That in a mattress on a fool does not surprise at all!
  5. aszzz888
    aszzz888 April 15 2015 07: 02
    And with regard to Russia, Madame ex-Secretary of State takes an openly hostile policy.

    Break off this viper’s teeth before ...
  6. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter April 15 2015 07: 35
    What a devil! What a pity that Oswald was not an agent of the Kremlin, but was just a pawn in the big game. Now I just wanted a dozen Oswalds to be in the mattress. This bloodthirsty lady can end the history of earthly civilization, simply because she is a hysterical woman. Merkel, by comparison, is innocence itself.
  7. fomkin
    fomkin April 15 2015 07: 42
    In fury, God forgive me.
  8. avl01
    avl01 April 15 2015 07: 58
    "I believe that in the United States, the president is the same talking head as Psaki, only at a higher rank. Who cares who runs the White House - an old white woman or a black man. She will still do what the owners tell him to do," said strelets ...
    I absolutely agree with you. One gets the impression that someone specifically selects presidential candidates mattresses of inadequate people (the first is a client of a mental hospital for violent, the second is the younger brother of the author of "Bushinisms"). Americans initially have no choice and they have to choose the lesser of evils .I think the aggressive aunt will take over, as Wang predicted and will be with the president.
    1. andrew42
      andrew42 April 16 2015 08: 40
      Exactly! "..then find the best of the worst" is today's American presidential market.
  9. 501Legion
    501Legion April 15 2015 08: 18
    I want her to die
  10. skill
    skill April 15 2015 09: 29
    This fucking ... stupid idiot can easily bring the world to nuclear war (
  11. samoletil18
    samoletil18 April 15 2015 09: 32
    Here, in the comments, "democratic values" are mentioned. The main value is the ability to choose. Under the US Constitution, voters elect an electoral college in their constituency for presidential elections. And these few thousand voters really determine which candidate in their state won. Since the advent of the United States, property qualifications have been decisive for the nomination of candidates to the electoral college. Those. people who fart in church for a penny on Easter are provided for there. Today, in a commentary to another article, I already wrote that instead of a truckload of whiskey, a couple of boxes are enough to bribe voters. Laughter and laughter, but the primaries (election of a candidate from the party) are a tough party filter that will filter out unnecessary candidates for the American financial oligarchy. And the presence of two parties will reduce all costs to funding only two candidates, which will give the desired effect without tangible costs for them.
    So it turns out that the murdered "dictators" Gaddafi, Hussein are much more honest than the guarantors of democratic values ​​around the world.
  12. KBPC50
    KBPC50 April 15 2015 09: 43
    There has never been and never will be democracy in its classical form: the rule of the people. Everywhere there is absolutely property qualification. There is no money and you are nobody, not even a crap, but you are a bum. No choices for you. The President of the United States is an ordinary puppet, and probably once tried to move away from this D.F. Kennedy, for which he was killed. And who killed? Chief of the CIA, but led by moneybags, "government 300", American masons. Whoever comes to power in the United States, the policy towards Russia and other states will not change. Germany, as it was an American zone of occupation, will remain so, Japan is an American aircraft carrier, African countries are donors of blood and oil, countries of South America are donors of almost free slaves, etc. When will they get drunk ?!
    1. andrew42
      andrew42 April 16 2015 08: 37
      THEY will never get drunk. From the first steps of the creation of the young state of the USA, an embryo of a liquidocratic parasite was embedded in its "body". The reason: the "British shell" has become cramped. John Washington associates who wrote the draft constitution were all Masons, albeit below the average rank. With the growth of the USA, the parasite grew, intensified, learned to defend itself and suppress "sanitary" reactions: it trampled on the Southern states in the Civil War, regularly cleaned up presidents who tried to take independent steps. The parasite has long grown out of the "skin of America" ​​and has sent tentacles all over the world, both from the States and from the reserve "British site". But everything that the parasite has tightly adhered to (Europe, Latin America, informal colonies and controlled territories) - all this can no longer feed it. The last potential donor and victim is Russia. But it does not come out yet guaranteed and for a long time to take in a hard grip. Therefore, the parasite has "withdrawal", starvation and tantrums.
  13. combin23
    combin23 April 15 2015 09: 45
    "In the coming years, we will have a head-on collision with the United States, not a latent, but possibly a head-on collision. Most likely, this can happen already under the new US President. And he, very likely, will already be an absolute monster! Obama will look like even cute and cute. " Grigory Kvasha "Komsomolskaya Pravda" 18.01.2015/XNUMX/XNUMX
  14. vitya1945
    vitya1945 April 15 2015 09: 55
    Yes ... It will be hard - but not boring.
  15. Cube123
    Cube123 April 15 2015 10: 37
    Quote: avl01
    “Americans initially have no choice and have to choose the lesser of evils.

    Actually, it’s not Americans who choose the President under American law. fellow , and the electoral college. She can reject a candidate who has received popular support. And these people teach us democracy am
    EE% E2 _ (% D1% D8% C0)
  16. chelovektapok
    chelovektapok April 15 2015 15: 00
    "Not a lady - not sugar sponges." Even Clinton will confirm. At one time he made his choice right in the oral office.
  17. Chupacabra
    Chupacabra April 15 2015 15: 03
    Hillary couldn’t satisfy her husband; he had to cope on the side, how can this satisfy the whole country?
  18. Denis Skiff M2.0
    Denis Skiff M2.0 April 15 2015 16: 21
    A senior Central Bank of the Netherlands fired for prostitution
    These cranks are taken to teach us.
  19. Arktidianets
    Arktidianets April 15 2015 17: 03
    The election of this monster to the presidency will be the last nail in the lid of the United States tomb, with which I congratulate them.
  20. Talgat
    Talgat April 15 2015 18: 54
    Yes, her "wow" was just disgusting. Their TOPs generally behave not like living normal people - but like some kind of aliens (and their TV presenters too)
  21. andrew42
    andrew42 April 15 2015 18: 54
    Madeleine Albright, Condoleezza Rice, Catherine Ashton, Hillary Clinton are just some kind of parade of latent (or maybe not) aggressive lesbians. Sufferers of unrealizable harassment. By the way, women's fights are much more brutal than men's fights. Even in sports. Hillary with a "nuclear suitcase" is worse than any other option.
  22. t118an
    t118an April 15 2015 19: 53
    67 years old, a stroke, her husband's betrayal, a failed "overload" ... she's still madam. Will Monica Lewinsky or Michelle Obama come to replace her?
  23. Tribuns
    Tribuns April 15 2015 20: 18
    Elena Gromova expressed the idea, which is supported by the majority of Russian patriots: "Only by strengthening the defenses - our own and those of our allies who can resist the US aggression - will we be able to withstand the world to come. At least in order not to give people like 'Madame Wow' new reasons for cruel joy." ...

    Russia also should not forget the commandment of the ancients, which the Yankees so eagerly follow, be it terrorists, as in Syria, or neo-Nazi Bandera, as in Ukraine: "The enemy of my enemy, my friend" ...
  24. nagel_Oz
    nagel_Oz April 15 2015 23: 31
    It doesn't matter who becomes the "big boss" of the White House. Obama has clearly failed as a political leader and will be replaced by a revanchist. Situevin with the policy of Uncle Sam, to put it mildly on Capitol Hill, does not make the Americans happy. A multipolar world is emerging, it is not getting along with the hegemony of the ever-green dollar, the many million-strong army of rich China is quietly arming, the BRICS, the SCO have appeared, and the sanctions against Russia have gone wrong. And the bear himself with a balalaika politely periodically shows the "great nation" his thumb. Somehow it is not at all good with ISIS, that something got sick on the Arabian Peninsula.
    And here is Hilary's angry big open mouth, (see above) ... What will the holding put in there?
  25. Denis Skiff M2.0
    Denis Skiff M2.0 April 16 2015 18: 04
    Quote: nagel_Oz
    What will the holding invest there?

    Big such
    Quote: nagel_Oz

    And they will sit and think what to do with her ...
  26. f, hfrjlf, hf
    f, hfrjlf, hf 12 May 2015 07: 29
    Well, there’s just no words; only laughter remained; I’m still thinking which of these clowns will end the American people. Really, the Americans don’t give a damn what they have with the foreign policy