US Republican Congressmen intend to offer Russia a compromise

72
An influential group of members of the Republican Party will publicize its vision of fundamental changes in US foreign policy, writes in its article for the Sputnik agency, President of the American University in Moscow, Eduard Lozansky. He is quoted RIA News.

US Republican Congressmen intend to offer Russia a compromise


“Russia will be offered certain compromise options for resolving the Ukrainian crisis in exchange for support in the fight against terrorist threats,” writes Lozansky with reference to “reliable sources.”

According to him, the one who will be the first to make such a statement “will earn a lot of political points”.

The search for new ways in relations with the Russian Federation has already begun. Last week in the American Congress, where “until recently, anti-Russian resolutions were stamped one after another, a discussion took place during which the American“ dissidents ”explained in detail to those present that the White House policy was wrong,” the author says.

In particular, Congressman Dana Rohrabacher stated that “instead of stirring up anti-Russian hysteria, President Obama should immediately begin negotiations with Putin, find a diplomatic solution to the Ukrainian crisis and reach an agreement on joint operations in the fight against radical Islam.”

Lozansky noted that well-known political scientists, journalists, and "even former analysts of the CIA and the Pentagon" criticized the White House policy. “Earlier, such voices were very rare,” he writes.

The author recalls that "according to a recent poll, more than a third of the members of the Republican Party consider President Obama" the greatest threat to America. "

“The growing discontent with the White House’s foreign policy strategy is primarily due to recent events in the Middle East, as well as the election campaign during which Republicans are trying to prove that Obama’s diplomacy failed miserably,” Lozansky said.
72 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +14
    April 13 2015 08: 45
    no, but why should we offer compromises?
    1. +18
      April 13 2015 08: 47
      Let them offer, and we will see whether to agree or not.
      1. jjj
        +32
        April 13 2015 08: 51
        America has little choice. And Republicans need trump cards in the presidential race. In fact, their sentences are just words. The Ukrainian civil war cannot be ended simply by peaceful means. The accumulated potential of hatred will not dissipate by itself. But America's purpose is clear. If this potential of hatred is hidden behind the screen of diplomacy and "peace and friendship" is established between Ukraine and Russia, then this hatred will be easily redirected to Russia. In the event of the continuation of the Ukrainian conflict, our society remains on the alert
        1. Fin
          +5
          April 13 2015 09: 54
          Quote: jjj
          The Ukrainian civil war simply cannot be ended by peaceful means. The accumulated potential of hatred does not resolve itself.

          Это точно. С укропами договариваться бесполезно - все переворачивают с ног на голову. Война продолжится, надеюсь на крупный разгром нацистов, только потом можно разговаривать. Замороженный конфликт ВСН не нужен, необходимо отогнать карателей за границы областей и мирную жизнь налаживать. Еще год разрухи и жителей не останется.
          1. 0
            April 13 2015 14: 06
            It seems to me, or is the person in the photo a fan of using something forbidden in all civilized countries?
        2. +1
          April 13 2015 18: 57
          And I do not believe the Americans, they can set us up at the most difficult moment. Now they need trump cards for the elections, and when the Republicans win the election, they will not need us.
          1. 0
            April 14 2015 12: 17
            And I don’t believe the Americans, they can substitute us at the most difficult moment.
            Amendment: They can’t, they are sure and guaranteed to substitute. There was not a single example in their history against such an opinion.
      2. +7
        April 13 2015 09: 09
        We’ll see - send them all at once or in parts.
      3. +9
        April 13 2015 09: 48
        The American compromise: well, since we could not kill you right away, then we agree that you will die slowly, but then you must help us with this.
      4. +3
        April 13 2015 11: 00
        The USSR regretted the United States and compromised and how it ended. Reptiles regroup again and begin to dirty again
      5. 0
        April 13 2015 12: 42
        Quote: viktorrymar
        no, but why should we offer compromises?

        Quote: viktorrymar
        Let them offer, and we will see whether to agree or not.

        What is the difference, dear colleagues! The main thing:
        "THE ICE HAS BEEN BROKEN, GENTLEMEN JURIORES! COMMAND THE PARADE ..." will be VV PUTIN! There is no one else!
        good
    2. +12
      April 13 2015 08: 54
      Wrong approach. Fundamentally. Compromises are offered equal. If you are less likely to offer a compromise, that would somehow protect yourself.
      I suggest to wait a year, two, and then present Ultimatum to the mattresses.
    3. +1
      April 13 2015 09: 04
      Like they don’t climb to us, but we don’t beat them
      1. +4
        April 13 2015 09: 43
        Quote: ZloeZloo
        Like they don’t climb to us, but we don’t beat them

        Like, they recognize that our Crimea, and we are stuck in a Middle East conflict. Only here is the vision of terrorists with our mattresses is different. For them, Bashar Assad is a bloody dictator, and the militia of New Russia are separatists and terrorists.
    4. The comment was deleted.
    5. +18
      April 13 2015 09: 06
      I think it will be very interesting how the compromise from America will look, although they cannot be trusted. I think they are tired with Ukraine.
      1. +6
        April 13 2015 09: 41
        Quote: Moment
        what a compromise from America will look like, although you can’t believe them. I think they are tired with Ukraine.

        Podljana is hidden in the very formulation of the question.
        Fight Islamic Terrorism? Whom do they consider as such? Our Syria and Assad, for example, are not considered as such.
        Go to fight ISIS? Bombing Yemen to save Saudi Arabia? Take part in a ground operation with the Saudis? This "opinion" there (among the Saudis) has already slipped - help, and we will raise oil prices. Considering that the "coalition" entered Yemen without UN approval - to take part in a barbaric attack on an independent state?
        And of course, "with full technical, aviation and other support from the United States"? Who again want to have a result with someone else's hands?
        I have an opinion that mattresses and mattresses do not have time anywhere where it smells of singed. Cool brewed porridge climbs over the edge. The role of the global hegemon is no longer taking place, and there are problems with finances. Hence such thoughts in republican heads
        1. 0
          April 13 2015 12: 48
          I have an opinion that mattresses and mattresses do not have time everywhere,
          I also have the impression that they didn’t understand. So many dictates of Sashka have grown prettier, and there is a restructuring of the world. Well, you won’t be hegemony, time is up.
    6. +1
      April 13 2015 09: 15
      Quote: Hubun
      no, but why should we offer compromises?

      Read Vladimir Lenin's article "On Compromises" - it is instructive (the comment does not express my political predilections).
    7. +2
      April 13 2015 09: 21
      We always have time to answer "no", we must first study any proposal thoroughly, and then draw conclusions and make decisions.
      1. +11
        April 13 2015 09: 32
        Quote: Thought Giant
        We always have time to answer "no", we must first study any proposal thoroughly, and then draw conclusions and make decisions.


        Diplomacy is the art of saying "good dog" until you find a suitable cobblestone.
        Popular Political Wisdom hi
      2. 0
        April 13 2015 13: 11
        How to create international terrorism, arming, teaching and feeding, so they cope without the help and advice of Russia! How to disentangle the "porridge" made with your own hands, so help Russia! While the situation is enduring, let them rake them off themselves, and when it becomes necessary to intervene, then intervene on their own terms and with their own methods, without regard to exceptional and others like that.
      3. +1
        April 13 2015 13: 11
        How to create international terrorism, arming, teaching and feeding, so they cope without the help and advice of Russia! How to disentangle the "porridge" made with your own hands, so help Russia! While the situation is enduring, let them rake them off themselves, and when it becomes necessary to intervene, then intervene on their own terms and with their own methods, without regard to exceptional and others like that.
    8. The comment was deleted.
    9. +3
      April 13 2015 09: 22
      Республиканцы понимают,что растет Военная мощь Китая и России,только Россия может уничтожит Америку, поэтому они нам будет предложить компромиссы,но от противостоянии с России, они никогда не откажут.
    10. +2
      April 13 2015 09: 35
      Quote: Hubun
      no, but why should we offer compromises?

      It's just that the US is trying to save the remnants of its reputation. But we don’t need to save the American image. The salvation of drowning, the business of the drowning. But seriously, a compromise is possible: the condemnation of Nazism in Ukraine, the condemnation of Russophobia, the elimination of punitive battalions and radical organizations, the punishment of criminals and the withdrawal of all American and European emissaries from Ukraine. Open elections and referendum on the further course of the Ukrainian republics.
      1. +1
        April 13 2015 11: 49
        What you have listed, this could only be considered as their first steps, after which, you could consider the very fundamental opportunity to think about compromises. Unfortunately this is not possible.

        In the current version it looks like: "I shit on you, neighbor, in front of the door and now, as a compromise, I propose to refuse (for a while) to smear the door from the pile imposed on you, in exchange for what you give me well ... let's say ... a piece of money. "
    11. The comment was deleted.
    12. +2
      April 13 2015 10: 32
      me, too, their logic touches: they broke the country, now they are ready to suspend Kiev’s hot heads in exchange for some obscure chernukha-adventure to fight terrorism ?! Gentlemen, diplomacy and all that is understandable, but let's follow justice and first roll back to the peak of Maidan, and then we will discuss possible cooperation. And so something starting positions are not equal ...
    13. +2
      April 13 2015 10: 37
      Because compromises are beneficial to them!
      По мне, так нужно, как в советские времена, поддержать народно-освободительные движения против Americans, в первую очередь в Латинской Америке и на Ближнем Востоке.
      In general, a good Yankee, dead Yankee ... :-)
    14. 0
      April 14 2015 06: 49
      Because the first to compromise is the weaker and unsure of their abilities and their innocence.
      Because America was condemned with ISIS and without Russia, with its influence on Syria and Iran, they can not do anything with it.
      I think that only "potential partners" will not be satisfied with our scenario IS drank.
      PS - subjectively, of course, but Lozinsky's b-sky muzzle with painted lips (this "source close to the congress - akhtung, or did it seem to me?) Just requires 9mm in the forehead. Disgusting photo.
  2. +1
    April 13 2015 08: 49
    Here it is a democratic struggle for power!
  3. Dudu
    +41
    April 13 2015 08: 49
    First step: you can’t win - lie.
    Step two: you can’t deceive - promise and deceive.
    Step three: do not believe - temporarily agree.
    Fourth step: agreed - deceived and act to strengthen their positions, while they believe.
    A predator will never let go of a prey!
    1. jjj
      +4
      April 13 2015 08: 52
      But, if suddenly the victim is too tough and snarls ...
    2. 0
      April 13 2015 09: 36
      Poroshenko in action ... am
  4. +2
    April 13 2015 08: 49
    Well, I really like this news. I understand that nothing concrete, most likely, will not be accepted and the intentions of the "partners" are difficult to recognize as sincere, but reading this is still nice.
    1. +4
      April 13 2015 08: 57
      Quote: old pioneer
      but it's still nice to read

      Most likely not pleasant but alarming. The United States offers nothing without gaining something. And here we need to think hard.
  5. +5
    April 13 2015 08: 51
    “Russia will be offered certain compromise options to resolve the Ukrainian crisis in exchange for support in the fight against terrorist threats”

    I’m losing weight from these Yankees, brewed porridge themselves, and now they offer compromises
  6. +6
    April 13 2015 08: 51
    Lord, shut yourself up on your island for years on 50, and prosperity will come in the world (on Earth), because it really does, like a cancerous tumor, the whole body hurts
  7. +6
    April 13 2015 08: 51
    What, you bastards, have you started to press your tail ?! Swept around the world in search of allies ?! Now it's our turn to define the "barter components"! angry
  8. +3
    April 13 2015 08: 51
    We ourselves have grown this infection, let them get out ourselves.
    1. +1
      April 13 2015 09: 13
      Quote: chauffeur
      We ourselves have grown this infection, let them get out ourselves.

      that’s how it is, but does anyone have any doubt that ISIS needs to be crushed to the last stubborn radical Islamist? Crush before these Islamists set fire to our Islamic Caucasus. I think it is necessary to help, but help, strengthening Syria, as our friend in the Middle East and the enemy of the United States, and the Saudis, and most importantly, as the first fighter against ISIS
  9. +13
    April 13 2015 08: 54
    Let’s dissolve NATO so and we will think!
  10. +4
    April 13 2015 08: 56
    "“Russia will be offered certain compromise options to resolve the Ukrainian crisis in exchange for support in the fight against terrorist threats”...

    I have nothing against working together against global threats ...

    However, from the experience of past years, it is clear that the United States again wants to drag chestnuts out of the fire, or extinguish this fire ... In this case, they want to drag Russia ...

    I don’t believe these American "dissidents", anyway there will be some tricks in their proposals ...

    Russia has no friends, no allies. Unfortunately, it must solve not only internal, but also part of the global problems of SAMA, and in this case, proceed only from motives - which is beneficial and necessary for us and only for us, and not for some staff members ...
  11. +1
    April 13 2015 08: 56
    What have they already "got drunk", don't want sanctions anymore? laughing
  12. The comment was deleted.
  13. 0
    April 13 2015 08: 56
    Elections, elections, candidates ... And the faces of the candidates are red, as if today is Saturday. What they will not promise before the election recourse
    1. 0
      April 13 2015 09: 38
      Does this Chubais face remind me of one?
  14. +1
    April 13 2015 08: 56
    The cat feels whose meat has eaten. But I don’t understand at all what is being specially selected there? Like a disgusting erysipelas so immediately to Congress.
    1. +2
      April 13 2015 09: 00
      Quote: Toad
      they are there that are specially selected

      200 year old selection.
  15. +3
    April 13 2015 09: 00
    Америкосам Россия нужна, как государство умеющее и имеющее возможность разрешать самые острые проблемы, в том числе и связанные с террористической угрозой, мирным путем. Эти же stupid people могут только применять бездумно военную силу в составе всевозможных коалиций. Сначала разожгут огонь, а потом всем миром его тушить...
  16. 0
    April 13 2015 09: 09
    They don’t have enough points
  17. +1
    April 13 2015 09: 11
    It’s just that, by and large, the election campaign has already begun ...
  18. +1
    April 13 2015 09: 13
    Russia will be offered certain compromise options to resolve the Ukrainian crisis in exchange for support in the fight against terrorist threats
    why so? and what will Svidomo say to this? yes what the hell they say. the tanned owner will order - they will do everything, and if they don’t obey - the whole world will find out who shot down the Boeing, or something else ...
    1. +1
      April 13 2015 09: 39
      Quote: klavyr
      why so? and what will Svidomo say to this?

      Petro Poroshenko says that Ukraine hopes for US support for the full implementation of the Minsk agreements by all parties. "The President noted that Ukraine is doing everything possible to implement the Minsk agreements and counts on the support of the United States to ensure their implementation by all parties."
      ...- the press service of the head of the Ukrainian state reports on the results of his meeting with the US Senator (US Republican Party) Robert Portman on Thursday in Kiev.

      In turn, the senator noted that he advocated greater US participation in the issue of ensuring the implementation of the Minsk agreements. According to him, the US Administration should take measures not only in the introduction of training programs for the military, but also in improving the defense capability of the Ukrainian army.

      Portman also noted the importance of further financial support for reforms in Ukraine.

      Poroshenko thanked the senator for his personal position regarding the need to provide Ukraine with more active support.

      The head of the Ukrainian state emphasized the need to introduce an international peacekeeping mission to "ensure the stability of the peace process."

      “We in Ukraine are now defending global security and global democracy. If we lose this battle, global security is losing "- the president also said.
      http://versii.com/news/325385/
      xxxxxx
      In short - Petina read the statement and decided that it was better to seek a compromise with Russia laughing
  19. +1
    April 13 2015 09: 16
    It seems to me that it is useless to negotiate with the Americans, they started something again, they are looking for profit, time, etc.
  20. +1
    April 13 2015 09: 16
    Compromises with the United States are possible, probably, only on the basis of active recognition of the zones of Russia's national interests. Winston Churchill did something like this when he painted zones of influence in Europe with Stalin. Cynical, but in politics there is no way without it. The subjects of geopolitics must have clear delineations of their zones, this is a guarantee of peace agreements. But the United States will not agree to this. The goodwill and capabilities of the "lame duck" are not enough.
  21. 0
    April 13 2015 09: 16
    It is interesting that the Americans climbed into Ukraine, made a mess there, and now they offer us some kind of compromise.
  22. +1
    April 13 2015 09: 17
    Of course, this position is more realistic. The whole question is on what conditions and with what proposals they are ready to contact us, whether these proposals will be sane. This is much more interesting than Obama's messianic sermons and the State Department's proposals to "shut up" as if defeated in the Cold War. These politicians are devoid of realism and, for the most part, there is nothing to talk to them about.
  23. +2
    April 13 2015 09: 30
    looks like delirium. What for the Americans to fight Islamic terrorism, which they cherish and cherish? The Yankees put on a wide practice used during the Cold War by both camps - this is to use the "national liberation movements" of certain countries in a big game to achieve their goals. ISIS, Alkaida are the forefront of the CIA, creating hotbeds of instability in the regions that Americans need. if they do not settle down with the swamp games in Russia, then it is necessary for ours to actively push the colored population of the United States into open confrontation with the authorities.
  24. 0
    April 13 2015 09: 33
    promise them everything you can, and we will hang later, it sounds something like this
  25. +2
    April 13 2015 09: 33
    Obama for the USA in the situation with Ukraine is the same threat as Khrushchev for the USSR in the Caribbean crisis.
    Too much of an overly stubborn adventurer-volunteer takes on himself, a compromise is still better than atomic warfare.
  26. +1
    April 13 2015 09: 36
    ... is connected primarily with the recent events in the Middle East, as well as with the election campaign, during which the Republicans are trying to prove that Obama’s diplomacy failed miserably, ”Lozansky believes. stop That’s the whole compromise! After the election, everything will be as before!
  27. +1
    April 13 2015 09: 48
    A compromise is certainly possible, but not as a weakening of Russia's position. It is impossible, likening to the recent rulers Gorbachev and Yeltsin, to do everything to the detriment of our country.
  28. +1
    April 13 2015 09: 50
    When they try to cooperate with us, it is even more annoying! First you need to restore confidence ...
  29. +4
    April 13 2015 09: 52
    The essence of the compromise can be only one surrender of Poroshenko and Co. to the International Tribunal for the genocide of their own people, the complete denazification of the Outskirts.
  30. +1
    April 13 2015 09: 52
    Quote: Hubun
    no, but why should we offer compromises?

    It is they who, in a bad game, want to come out with a beautiful face!
    They got things done, now they don’t know how to steer without cod and shame
  31. kelevra
    0
    April 13 2015 10: 03
    We will decide for ourselves what to do with certain tasks and problems!
  32. 0
    April 13 2015 10: 08
    Как американцев не маскируй, всё равно суть их - собачья
  33. +1
    April 13 2015 10: 32
    You can’t trust the Pindostats ... but we can deal with our own terrorists ...
  34. +1
    April 13 2015 10: 46
    “Russia will be offered certain compromise options ... in exchange for support in the fight against terrorist threats”
    Does anyone understand anything? For them, it turns out there are no threats, but for us there will certainly be and then can the states help us? Will they support us morally?
    Fuck ...
  35. +1
    April 13 2015 10: 47
    Quote: Fin
    It is useless to negotiate with dill - everything is turned upside down.

    So this is because they are not doing what is good for them, but what the host (USA) will say.
  36. 0
    April 13 2015 10: 58
    I read and garbage! Bees against honey! Oh well! Fight against what you yourself spawned! Strong move! The hand fights with itself! Like chess with itself !!!
    1. 0
      April 13 2015 11: 34
      I fully join your opinion - everything to the point, there is nothing to add.
  37. 0
    April 13 2015 11: 42
    Russia will be offered certain compromise options to resolve the Ukrainian crisis
    Good advice and promises not to provide "non-lethal" pomoshch.Pravda Russia will have to spend a little bit, fight, make even more enemies around the world.
  38. 0
    April 13 2015 11: 43
    It is hardly worth taking these proposals seriously.
    As they moved their "Anaconda" around us, and move, as they poured into their ears about "NATO not going to the East" - so it will be, as the bases were set up - it will be so. This is a chance to "dissolve" us once again.
  39. 0
    April 13 2015 12: 18
    Again stsuki planned something, or decided for some reason to pull. But in any case, stir up the water and once again try to throw !!!!! There is no faith P AND N D O S A M they do everything to the detriment of Russia !!!!
  40. 0
    April 13 2015 12: 24
    Fear the Danes bringing gifts !!!
  41. 0
    April 13 2015 22: 41
    health
    You feel that the star-creator comes to them as a country that they respect ... and they try to PRISE to someone else's glory. And it will be profitable to throw it and say that they are saints. Zvidos cannot be trusted!
  42. 0
    April 13 2015 23: 45
    Return Alaska, and there we will talk ...
  43. 0
    April 14 2015 14: 36
    What kind of faces do these women have ...?