Military Review

The Northern Fist of the United States against Russia: The Threat of Kaliningrad and Nuclear Forces

97


After the beginning of the Ukrainian crisis, the flow of anti-Russian propaganda in the world reached the span of the times of the Soviet Union. But while in most EU countries there are relatively neutral forces calling for reconciliation, in the countries of Scandinavia and the Baltic states the line towards Russia is as radical and destructive as possible. It is in these countries that US influence is constantly growing: in the Baltic States there are no independent states at all, and in Scandinavia, the process is actively going in the same direction. Interestingly, of the four Scandinavian countries (we assign Finland to them as well - it does not always appear in this geographical concept) NATO includes only Norway and Denmark, while Sweden and Finland still maintain non-blocking status, at least in words. Nevertheless, the wave of anti-Russian hysteria and militarization is overwhelming and these two states.

Disinformation and lies at the highest level are used: what was it worth история with a Russian nuclear submarine, supposedly swimming in the territorial waters of Sweden. Only now, why did a heavy missile carrier need to swim there and how could such an object be missed, no one answered - irresponsibility in big politics is now in vogue. Norway, in general, constantly pours “crocodile tears” - focusing attention on flights of the Russian strategic aviation (which, by the way, has never violated anyone’s borders), and most recently put forward a ridiculous assumption that Russian research vessels "spy" behind them, located at the former Olavsvern submarine base. The Norwegian authorities sold the base a few years ago themselves, since the cost of its operation was huge, but it didn’t have much military meaning - it won’t save one on one in the war with the Russian Federation, although it really is a powerful refuge for submarines, but in the global In the conflict, the underwater part of the Norwegian Navy is an insignificant force - only 6 Ula-class diesel-electric submarines.

The rhetoric in Denmark and Finland is not so harsh, and the amount of very obvious disinformation voiced by officials is much less. But we are about words. And the actions are no different - Denmark has already agreed to take part in the formation of the European missile defense system (EUROPRO), and Finland is actively establishing interaction of its armed forces (Armed Forces) with the armies of other Scandinavian and Baltic countries (especially Sweden) and, of course, with the US Armed Forces .

Military tandem Sweden - Finland

The most active is the formation of the military tandem Sweden - Finland, and although the intentions to create a military bloc with the participation of these countries were officially refuted, in fact the opposite is happening. Countries expressed their willingness to create joint ground and naval brigades, and at the end of March they held joint exercises of the air force. They were also attended by the US Air Force, who arrived at the Estonian airfield Emari. Moreover, the integration of the Air Forces of these two countries will continue to grow - instead of 62 aging American F / A-18 fighters, Finland is going to buy either Swedish SAAB JAS-39 Gripen of the new modification or French Dassault Rafale, and most likely the choice will fall on the "Swedes". In both cases, the interaction of the Air Forces of the countries will noticeably increase, and in the case of the purchase of JAS-39 it will reach a maximum - even the weapons and spare parts will be unified.

Now the key task for the United States in this direction is to draw these countries into NATO. The population of states is actively preparing for this - in the event of another escalation of the Ukrainian conflict, the entry of Sweden and Finland into NATO can become a matter of time.

Baltic bridgehead

The active deployment of US troops in the territory of Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia, as well as ongoing NATO exercises there, suggest that these three countries will become a springboard for NATO forces, including for Scandinavian aviation. The geographical location of these countries makes it possible to simultaneously strike from there both in the direction of the Kaliningrad region surrounded by NATO and in the direction of the Leningrad and Pskov regions. The armed forces of the Baltic countries themselves are extremely weak and few in number - in the sum, they can deploy only about 23 thousands of servicemen, while they cannot boast with any significant amount of military equipment, and these countries have practically no air forces. So, the main role of these states - to become a springboard for NATO troops and a battlefield - is not the most rosy prospect, but this cannot interest the anti-people authorities of these countries, "dancing to the tune" of the overseas "ally".

Norway: arctic oil bait


Among the Scandinavian countries, Norway is perhaps the highest degree of anti-Russian hysteria. And unlike the Baltic states - there is also a material substrate here - namely, Arctic oil reserves, for which the Norwegians have serious views, however, like us. This is superimposed on pressure from the United States, leading to a kind of “resonance”. In addition, the Americans can “warm up” the Arctic appetites of the Norwegians, killing two birds with one stone - forming a new enemy for Russia and increasing the supply of their weapons. Thus, Norway finds itself in a kind of "trap", the basis of which is its energy ambitions. As for the purely military component, Norway is strong with its Air Force and fleetas well as a high level of training of soldiers. Deliveries of 5th-generation F-35 American fighter jets will begin very soon, which will be purchased in the amount of 52 units, in addition to (and in the future, replacement) to the 57 F-16.

"Northern Fist" against Russia

As we can already see, the countries listed above are increasingly militarizing and uniting around anti-Russian ideology. Under the patronage of the United States formed a kind of military "fist", threatening the north-western borders of Russia. What forces and in what directions can these states advance against the Russian Federation?

1) A powerful air force group capable of operating from the Murmansk region and up to the Kaliningrad region - along the entire length of the conventional front line. In total, it includes almost 300 fighter - 62 F-18, 134 JAS-39 Gripen and 102 F-16. All airplanes are lightweight, but of quite good quality and in very serious quantities.

2) Two naval groups - the first in the "northern seas" (Northern, Norwegian, Barents), represented mainly by the Norwegian fleet. It includes 5 frigates of the Fridtjof Nansen type, equipped with Naval Strike Missile anti-ship missiles (ASM) and the Aegis combat information control system, 6 Skjold type missile boats with the same missiles and 6 Ula-type diesel submarines.

The second is in the Baltic Sea, represented by the Finnish, Swedish and Danish Navy. Here can be thrown into battle: 5 Danish frigates with American anti-ship missiles Harpoon and a good air defense system; 5 Swedish diesel-electric submarines with torpedo armament and 9 corvettes with RBS-15 RCC, 5 of which of class Visby, created using Stealth technology; 8 Finnish missile boats with anti-ship missiles RBS-15 (maximum launch range 200 km), 6 mine barriers and 13 mine sweepers.

3) Ground forces - we will not consider Danish forces here, since geographically they are somewhat “torn off” from the scene. Finland, Sweden and Denmark in total can put up 31 thousand soldiers, 284 German tank Leopard 2 and about 1000 units of various artillery. Another 23 thousand, however, completely deprived of technology, have the Baltic countries. As you can see, ground forces are the weakest point in these countries.

In addition, there is an American presence in the Baltic States - so far a small, only a few dozen pieces of equipment and several hundred personnel who officially arrived at the exercises, but so far are not in a hurry to go back to the United States.

Kaliningrad region - target number 1


The Kaliningrad region, which is actually surrounded by NATO forces, due to the presence of land borders only with Poland and Lithuania is the most vulnerable target for a potential enemy. Already, Lithuania is often satisfied with the problems in the delivery of goods across its territory, a complete land blockade, as well as an energy one, is theoretically possible.

The forces of the RF Armed Forces stationed in the Kaliningrad region are not very large, but they are actively rearming, for example, already in 2012, the most modern C-400 anti-aircraft missile systems turned out to be there. However, the number of troops is small - only about 10 thousand people.

At the same time, up to 80, thousands of servicemen can be thrown into battle from Poland and from the Baltic states — and this is without American support. The forces of the Northern Fist can provide powerful air support to Polish ground forces and try to create a naval blockade of Kaliningrad. The Baltic Fleet of the Russian Navy will oppose this attempt to take Kaliningrad in full siege - its forces are approximately equal to the combined forces of the Northern Kulak Navy: 2 destroyer of the 956 project, 2 of the modern patrol ship of the 11540 project (built using Stealth technology), 4 of the patrol ship 20380 project, 12 missile boats, 3 diesel-electric submarines. All of these ships are armed with anti-ship missiles of various types, most of which exceed the characteristics of the Scandinavian and American anti-ship missiles. So the victory in this confrontation depends more on the level of crew training and third-party factors, such as intelligence, etc.

The task of the RF Armed Forces in the event of such an aggressive attempt to occupy the Kaliningrad region should be the speediest penetration of the land corridor through Latvia and Lithuania - here they can try to prevent the ground forces and aviation of Sweden, Norway and Finland by linking part of the forces of the Western Military District (ZVO) in the Leningrad region . Of course, the ZVO forces, which concentrate up to 40% of the personnel of the RF Armed Forces, are incomparably more powerful, but nonetheless the forces of the Northern Fist may gain time until reinforcements from Western Europe and the USA approach.

Limited nuclear conflict

Is the scenario of such a major European war real in the presence of large arsenals of strategic and tactical nuclear weapons? weapons at the opposing sides? If the same Baltic states, Poland, Belarus, Ukraine, Finland, Norway — that is, non-nuclear states — become the main “battlefield,” then it is real. Nuclear strikes will not be applied to the states that possess them. Nevertheless, in this situation, the use of tactical nuclear weapons causes little doubt - this is especially relevant for us, since the number of NATO armies exceeds ours by several times in almost all indicators. As a result - in such a war the losers will be those countries that now most of all are fighting for the fight against Russia. And there will be no winners in it - both camps will receive hundreds of thousands of destroyed soldiers and mountains of destroyed military equipment. Nevertheless, humanity, as history shows, cannot long exist without wars - and there are no (major) of them in Europe since 1945. How many more years will a nuclear weapon be able to restrain aggression and hatred? It is clear that the war would have flared in Europe back in March of 2014, if not for this deterrent.

Conclusions and perspectives


1) The "Northern Fist" is really being formed. His goal so far is geopolitical pressure on Russia and the creation of a threat to the Kaliningrad region.

2) The grouping of troops in Kaliningrad should be maintained in the maximum combat-ready state; its strength, if possible, should be increased.

3) The United States, by creating a “mini” military bloc in Scandinavia and the Baltics, is even more tightly squeezing the ring of the military environment of Russia.

4) Norway, despite its ambitions, is still far from being able to deal with Russia in the Arctic. The Northern Fleet of the Russian Federation is a serious power, with which it is impossible to use 6 diesel submarines, several frigates and missile boats. Russia has 45 submarines here, including the 23 nuclear, the aircraft carrying cruiser Admiral Kuznetsov, the heavy nuclear cruiser Peter the Great and many other ships.

5) In addition to geopolitical reasons and the struggle of the US against Russia, there is a much more pressing task - to make the military-industrial complex work at full speed, despite the economic problems in most European countries. Now even conditionally impoverished Baltic states are beginning to allocate some money for the purchase of military equipment.

6) A big war in Europe can still occur - the level of tension at some moments is really close to critical. And the presence of a large number of weapons and active preparation for war can cause excess self-confidence.

7) The next step in the expansion of the European missile defense project could be the deployment of anti-missile systems in Scandinavia. The GMD (Ground-based Midcourse Defense) missile defense system will be able to intercept a portion of Russian intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) flying across the North Pole to the United States. And most importantly, to intercept them prior to the withdrawal of combat units — after all, most modern ICBMs in Russia have separable warheads. This alignment is quite possible after the 2020 year, when the current stage of the European missile defense system will be implemented and the GMD will be “brought to mind”. The temptation to start a war after such a step will naturally be even higher.

8) The countries included in this new anti-Russian bloc are not the beneficiaries - rather, on the contrary, they will have the worst of all, in which case they will become the battlefield. To the United States, as before, far away.

9) All countries that are close to Russia and host elements of US missile defense must be warned at the highest level that they will be the very first target for the strategic nuclear forces of the Russian Federation and they will receive not death, but vice versa, mortal danger. The statement should not be at the level of the ambassador, as was done in Denmark, but at the highest. The population of these countries should know what the decisions of their governments lead to.
Author:
Originator:
http://www.regnum.ru/news/polit/1913924.html
97 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. fomkin
    fomkin April 14 2015 06: 00
    +25
    I read the article and recalled how Dimets presented part of the water area of ​​Norway.
    1. Dembel77
      Dembel77 April 14 2015 06: 31
      +10
      Now the key task for the USA in this direction is to draw these countries into NATO.
      If the Scandinavians do not have their own mind, let them get involved in anything! Regarding the aggressive ambitions of the United States and NATO in Europe, our president gave a completely transparent answer: “Russia has only two military bases abroad - in Kyrgyzstan and in Tajikistan, while the United States has bases around the world,” Russian President Vladimir Putin said during a press conference. conferences in Moscow.
      He asks the question of what the US bases are doing in Europe? " ensuring our safety, then we can do it. "
      That is, the answer will be and I'm sure convincing!
    2. bulatovvvas
      bulatovvvas April 14 2015 08: 27
      +11
      Quote: fomkin
      I read the article and recalled how Dimets presented part of the water area of ​​Norway.

      For many years there has been a debate about this part of the water area and this is not an isolated case when DAM with GDP is given to our neighbors with border adjustment. Gorbachev and Shevarnadze also moved 600 miles in the Pacific in favor of the United States, moreover, in silence. I am outraged that these essentially temporary workers, behind the scenes, correct the borders approved by the post-war treaties and secured by shed blood (including Damansky) without any discussion in the media!
    3. Mviktor
      Mviktor April 14 2015 08: 36
      +13
      And Putin is pulling with the reform of the liberal economic bloc of Russia, and this is similar to death in the current balance of power
      1. Genry
        Genry April 14 2015 09: 27
        +4
        Help the National Liberation Movement (NLM) by participating in rallies supporting Putin and changing the Constitution (officially timed to historical events).

        Chatter on the forums - it's chatter !!!
      2. NordUral
        NordUral April 14 2015 10: 26
        +10
        Here, reform is no longer needed, but confiscation and the death penalty. Although these are half measures - capitalism is not for us, it's time to tie it up. Only socialism should not be Khrushchev-Brezhnev, although what was good even in it should be taken.
    4. NordUral
      NordUral April 14 2015 10: 24
      +1
      Yes, good people are in our power.
    5. GOR_XVII
      GOR_XVII April 14 2015 11: 15
      +4
      Quote: fomkin
      fomkin
      I read the article and recalled how Dimets presented part of the water area of ​​Norway.

      And I remembered so much how Lenin gave the whole country Finland to the Germans. Now a good Finnish autonomous region would be part of Russia.
      1. Victor jnnjdfy
        Victor jnnjdfy April 15 2015 11: 09
        +2
        Now there is information that the Great October Revolution was made by the Finns ... In a general mess, 170-180 Finnish military officers arrived in Petrograd in an organized manner, made a coup (fortunately, no one was going to defend the Provisional Government there), and then safely left for Finland. The Bolsheviks paid off almost immediately for their "work" with the Finns. In December 1917 Finland gained independence. Lenin did not give anything, but most likely simply fulfilled the terms of the contract.
    6. Ascetic
      Ascetic April 14 2015 11: 52
      +15
      Quote: fomkin
      I read the article and recalled how Dimets presented part of the water area of ​​Norway.


      Russia's strategic goal is to obtain rights to a vast area of ​​1 million square kilometers around the Lomonosov Ridge in the Arctic. If Norway had unresolved territorial disputes with Russia, it could prevent us in this matter.
      The agreement also opened the way for Russia to develop hydrocarbon deposits that are located on previously disputed territory.
      So this compromise agreement essentially opened the way for us to expand our borders and deprived our opponents of the same Norway of legal arguments in international courts.
      The same thing along the Chinese border, China has lost the last reason to demand the return of the vast territories taken from Russia by him in 1858-1860.
      We also managed to prove our rights to 52 thousand square kilometers in the center of the Sea of ​​Okhotsk. Now, from a legal point of view, this is not part of the oceans, but our legal territory.
      The Sea of ​​Okhotsk has become the inland sea of ​​Russia and now belongs to us entirely
      link
      In September 2013, the crews of two transport helicopters in the Laptev Sea discovered a new the island that it was decided to call Yaya The island was assigned to the Novosibirsk islands archipelago and became its new extreme point in the west.
      The discovery of the island pushes the boundaries of the exclusive economic zone of Russia deep into the Arctic. The territorial waters of Russia will increase by 452 square miles.
      Well, Crimea, of course ... So in terms of the increment of territories, not everything is so bad ...
      1. bulatovvvas
        bulatovvvas April 14 2015 16: 27
        +3
        Quote: Ascetic
        Norway had unresolved territorial disputes with Russia; it could prevent us in this matter.

        I agree that Norway could interfere, but not the fact that it will not interfere, and the question of recognizing the shelf for Russia is still open. The same thing along the Chinese border, in 1912, the President of the Republic of China recognized all previously accepted treaties and agreements on the border with Russia. In 1858-1860, the territory that was previously captured by China was returned to Russia. Not so long ago, Merkel presented the PRC with a map where Baikal allegedly entered the borders of China, and now what? And as a result of the demarcation of the Russian-Chinese border in 2005, China allocated several times more area than the territory of Crimea. The Sea of ​​Okhotsk did not become inland, but is marginal, do not forget about Japan. And Shevarnadze and Gorbachev moved the demarcation line in favor of the United States in the Bering Sea and the 200-mile strait (I apologize for the typo in the previous comment), which contradicts not only our interests, but also the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea and has no legal objections or claims.
      2. Dmitry Toderes
        Dmitry Toderes April 14 2015 20: 10
        +3
        Quote: Ascetic


        Well, Crimea, of course ... So in terms of the increment of territories, not everything is so bad ...


        Especially in terms of population - people are the main thing. Russia has grown by two million at once. This is me about the entry of Crimea into Russia.
      3. Saratoga833
        Saratoga833 April 20 2015 15: 31
        0
        Quote: Ascetic
        legal arguments

        All of these legal quotes are an idle talk! The international community really only recognizes power. Russia will be strong militarily and economically - all these agreements will have very relative significance.
    7. Saratoga833
      Saratoga833 April 20 2015 15: 20
      0
      Quote: fomkin
      Dimets donated part of the water area of ​​Norway.

      This "worker" has done a lot of nasty things to Russia! Whatever he did during his "leadership", EVERYTHING has to be redone! And to this day, it is not clear to me why, he continues to occupy an unworthy post of him!
  2. Alexander Romanov
    Alexander Romanov April 14 2015 06: 02
    +53
    Conclusions and perspectives
    I’m not an expert to draw conclusions on the correlation of forces. On the maps it is one thing, but in life completely different. Hitler compared, everything said that he would win, but it turned out completely different. In Kaliningrad, now everything is quiet and calm, but in the USA, stepping out into the street and looking at the sky, the floor of Texas is enriched. Not Photoshop, a natural phenomenon or an omen
    1. bars280
      bars280 April 14 2015 06: 14
      +4
      offset, it’s a pity that only one mushroom !!!
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov April 14 2015 06: 22
        +13
        Quote: bars280
        offset, it’s a pity that only one mushroom !!!

        Why you are alone wink
        1. podpolkovnik
          podpolkovnik April 14 2015 10: 51
          0
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          Quote: bars280
          offset, it’s a pity that only one mushroom !!!

          Why you are alone wink
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich April 14 2015 06: 24
      +3
      Quote: Alexander Romanov
      omen

      mesmerizing ... would look and look ... good
      1. kot28.ru
        kot28.ru April 14 2015 06: 39
        +3
        The element she iswhen a hurricane passed in the city, I stood on the balcony for about 10 minutes, watched how the clouds behave unusually, then it started that I had to quickly fall down, after 15 minutes I looked out again, the yard really changed, and near a fresh Lexus there was a poplar, of which us in Blagoveshchensk unmeasured fellow ! Imagine how his owner felt, the water in the courtyard was knee-deep even before the morning! hi
        1. jjj
          jjj April 14 2015 12: 54
          0
          How did skyscrapers stand in Heihe?
    4. kot28.ru
      kot28.ru April 14 2015 06: 33
      +4
      We protect the world, we protect the world, and we’ll stick the atomic buoy to anyone you want !!! soldier
    5. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa April 15 2015 01: 32
      +4
      Quote: Alexander Romanov
      On the maps it is one thing, but in life it is completely different. In Kaliningrad, now everything is quiet and calm, but in the USA ...

      Yes, but on US headquarters maps this is drawn ...
      Therefore, you need to be strong and be ready to disrupt the plans drawn on the "partners" headquarters cards because of a puddle
    6. Saratoga833
      Saratoga833 April 20 2015 15: 44
      0
      Quote: Alexander Romanov
      teased sex texas

      Seeing this from your window - nothing surprising!
  3. anakonda
    anakonda April 14 2015 06: 03
    -40
    The author of the article looks like a little boy in a dark room smile all the time it seems that someone is about to attack, some monster will definitely appear wassat .
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov April 14 2015 06: 06
      +24
      Quote: anakonda
      all the time it seems that someone is about to attack

      Of course, after all, no one has ever attacked us. Napoleon and Hitler did not exist, there are no bases around Russia, everything is just a bunch.
      1. anakonda
        anakonda April 14 2015 06: 18
        -31
        If you look back all the time and think that Hitler attacked, then Finland and Sweden may not attack so long and wrap themselves up in a blind alley, from which Russia got out after the collapse of the Soviet Union and into which it can again wrap itself up, we must cooperate with our neighbors, and do not make plans for an atomic war with them. This article can be translated into a light somewhere in Norway and no anti-Russian propaganda is needed.
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov April 14 2015 06: 35
          +11
          Quote: anakonda
          If you look back all the time and think that Hitler attacked,

          The smart ones learn from mistakes and remember history, in the west they have already forgotten it. In Armenia, I look, too, some have begun to forget.
          1. anakonda
            anakonda April 14 2015 07: 23
            -8
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            Quote: anakonda
            If you look back all the time and think that Hitler attacked,

            The smart ones learn from mistakes and remember history, in the west they have already forgotten it. In Armenia, I look, too, some have begun to forget.

            As they said in Soviet times, nothing has been forgotten, no one has been forgotten, but Azerbaijan cannot be compared with Finland.
            1. Alexander Romanov
              Alexander Romanov April 14 2015 07: 32
              +1
              Quote: anakonda
              , but Azerbaijan cannot be compared with Finland.

              laughing Can I take a look at another article?
              1. anakonda
                anakonda April 14 2015 07: 40
                0
                Quote: Alexander Romanov
                Quote: anakonda
                , but Azerbaijan cannot be compared with Finland.

                laughing Can I take a look at another article?

                I appreciated your humor, I did not look at the author’s name and surname fellow.
        2. Simon
          Simon April 14 2015 07: 05
          +6
          Tell me how to cooperate with our neighbors if they arrange an embargo on us and set the Baltic and Scandinavian countries against us. fool
          1. anakonda
            anakonda April 14 2015 07: 34
            -3
            Quote: Simon
            Tell me how to cooperate with our neighbors if they arrange an embargo on us and set the Baltic and Scandinavian countries against us. fool

            To give advice is an ungrateful affair, but you can reduce the degree of propaganda and not print such articles, I wrote above that they can be read along with comments not only in Russia.
          2. bulatovvvas
            bulatovvvas April 14 2015 09: 02
            +5
            Quote: Simon
            Tell me how to cooperate with our neighbors if they arrange an embargo on us and set the Baltic and Scandinavian countries against us.

            I consider Putin's foreign policy and diplomacy a failure. Remember the victories of Russian diplomacy against the Entente, the Caribbean crisis, and what kind of well .. Kolontai and Gromyko came out with dignity. And we have ignorant Chernomyrdin and Zurabov on the outskirts. Lavrov is a hard worker, but why can we rely only on Nazarbayev and Lukashenko, and not completely?
            1. anakonda
              anakonda April 14 2015 09: 44
              +2
              In my innocent comment, one might say, a call for peace, I have already received 35 minuses, so get ready, dear smile .
            2. Altona
              Altona April 14 2015 10: 27
              +1
              Quote: bulatovvvas
              And we have ignorant Chernomyrdin and Zurabov on the outskirts. Lavrov is a hard worker, but why can we rely only on Nazarbayev and Lukashenko, and not completely?

              -----------------------
              And what would they do against Bandera? Would they persuade that this is byaka? The Ukrainians themselves did a lot of business and, in the end, were not children ... They finished up the Ukrainian SSR, and nothing more was served to them ...
              1. bulatovvvas
                bulatovvvas April 14 2015 19: 03
                +3
                Quote: Altona
                And what would they do against Bandera? Would they persuade that this is byaka?

                Yes, the same as what the "Americans" did, only with the opposite sign. Yes, even to distribute "liver", especially the Russian Federation invested $ 200 billion in Ukraine, and the United States only $ 5 billion. The Russian ambassador is historically and mentally obliged to be closer than a guest from across the ocean.
                1. AleksUkr
                  AleksUkr 27 June 2015 09: 09
                  0
                  Quote: bulatovvvas
                  The Russian ambassador, historically and mentally, must be closer than a guest from overseas.

                  The Russian ambassador didn’t give out cookies on the square ... So they were offended. Life for free always likes work more ...
            3. anakonda
              anakonda April 14 2015 11: 41
              +4
              As for Chernomyrdin, I saw Viktor Stepanovich in the photo when he was his ambassador to Ukraine, and so, Viktor Stepanovich stood with a Cossack saber, and on the saber a full glass of vodka, there were a lot of Ukrainians in national clothes around, everyone looked at Victor Stepanovich approvingly, and below there was a comment that Viktor Stepanovich in one gulp, immediately drank a glass of vodka smile , right from the saber. I write about it, although many years have passed since then, I remembered this act of Viktor Stepanovich for a long time and thought: it’s Viktor Stepanovich who gives me, it’s immediately obvious that this is a RUSSIAN MUZHIK, I think that people standing nearby Ukrainians are with him, and as for Zurabov, he looks like a cracker and after Viktor Stepanovich somehow does not pull and looks pale.
            4. aleks26
              aleks26 30 June 2015 15: 17
              0
              Quote: bulatovvvas
              why can we rely only on Nazarbayev and Lukashenko, and not completely?

              Are you sure you can rely somehow? sad In vain. 2008 taught nothing? And the Crimea?
        3. vit8180
          vit8180 April 14 2015 10: 02
          +3
          Dear, how do YOU ​​look at your "partner" who imposes on YOU his conditions, obviously not beneficial for YOU, while threatening YOU with sanctions, provokes YOU to use force in order to untie your hands and justify your aggressive actions. And with all this, she smiles sweetly at YOU in the face and pours shit on YOU all over the world !!!
          1. anakonda
            anakonda April 14 2015 10: 56
            +7
            All over the world, no one loves anyone, Armenians in the Caucasus, Azerbaijanis and Turks just do not like, Georgians, except themselves, do not recognize anyone, I do not call for surrender, in my opinion, I got so many minuses, because the forum users thought that I a defeatist, I only called for a realistic and adequate assessment of the situation in the world, Finland and Sweden will never attack Russia, even if the United States really want it, unless, of course, Saakashvili is among their leadership smile . The psychology of the besieged fortress is not very useful for any state, at one time the SOVIET UNION tamed Finland the same way, so heaped up orders that it never occurred to anyone. Where possible, it is necessary to interact in the economy, while defending their national interests, Baltic countries are a little afraid of Russia smile or maybe pretend that they are scared to get the title of beloved wife of the United States for free wassat , all this will settle down over time.
            1. Aleksander
              Aleksander April 14 2015 11: 27
              +1
              Quote: anakonda
              I just called for a realistic and adequate assessment of the situation

              And who told you that your assessment is adequate? In my opinion, absolutely NO ....
              1. anakonda
                anakonda April 14 2015 12: 00
                -1
                Quote: Aleksander

                And who told you that your assessment is adequate? In my opinion, absolutely NO ....

                Do you think that Finland and Sweden, together with them Norway and the Baltic countries, are not in the wings today, so tomorrow they will attack Russia, do you agree with this statement of the author of the article?
                1. Days
                  Days April 15 2015 02: 25
                  +1
                  And why should they stop attacking? God grant that only they attack, and not in a coalition with all of Europe, as is usually the case.
            2. Altona
              Altona April 14 2015 14: 20
              +2
              Quote: anakonda
              All over the world, no one loves anyone, Armenians in the Caucasus, Azerbaijanis and Turks just do not like, Georgians, except themselves, do not recognize anyone, I do not call for surrender, in my opinion, I got so many minuses, because the forum users thought that I defeatist, I only called for a realistic and adequate assessment of the situation in the world, Finland and Sweden will never attack Russia

              ------------------------
              So, anakonda, let's talk without Armenian fervor ... Who is the "besieged fortress"? If we compare Nagorno-Karabakh and Russia, then clearly not Russia, even from the West, and even so unfriendly ... And in the East, except Japan, no one was sanctioned, but their islands do not give them rest ... Further, who do you see in the first echelon of military invasion of Russia? From Europe ... Except for the Svidomo, who are fighting high-rise buildings in the Donbass, there is no one else, the rest only menacingly inflate their gills and air bubbles in their NATO swamp ...
              1. anakonda
                anakonda April 14 2015 15: 38
                0
                You probably didn’t carefully read my comment about the besieged fortress — I wrote only about the psychology of the besieged fortress, nobody really could physically block Russia, I didn’t think about it at all, and about Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh, you can see my comments, but he never wrote that here is an earthly paradise and one of the causes of the plight in Armenia is a physical blockade by Turkey and Azerbaijan.
        4. not Russian
          not Russian April 14 2015 10: 20
          +1
          I agree. An article with some kind of darling. It can be interpreted in two ways. But someone needs it.
        5. Anchonsha
          Anchonsha 24 July 2015 12: 08
          0
          That’s just the point - let the Scandinavians read this article, they may understand that first of all they will pay for bad relations with mattresses, who will always feel more comfortable away from a nuclear war in a smelly and depraved gayrop. In addition, we do not attack anyone, we are not approaching the borders of others, with neighbors we behaved favorably sometimes even at a loss to ourselves. And in Ukraine, the West itself ignited the fire of war, while in Ukraine itself it was supported.
      2. Bayonet
        Bayonet April 14 2015 06: 30
        +5
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        L. Nebylo Napoleon and Hitler,

        There was no nuclear weapon as the main deterrent.
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov April 14 2015 06: 37
          +2
          Quote: Bayonet

          There was no nuclear weapon as the main deterrent.

          He is no longer so restraining, climb into the arrogant.
          1. aleks26
            aleks26 30 June 2015 15: 29
            0
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            He is no longer so restraining, climb into the arrogant.

            This is because they do not believe that it will be applied. Like, you're not suicides. And somewhere, there is something in it. It hurts our government indecisive. And in this situation, all nuclear weapons are a waste of money.
        2. The comment was deleted.
    2. science fiction writer
      science fiction writer April 14 2015 06: 14
      +5
      Quote: anakonda
      The author of the article looks like a little boy in a dark room smile all the time it seems that someone is about to attack, some monster will definitely appear wassat .

      It’s easier for Luch to cross over than later to do it
      1. Andrey Yuryevich
        Andrey Yuryevich April 14 2015 06: 31
        -3
        The Northern Fleet of the Russian Federation represents a serious power, which is impossible to compete with using 6 diesel submarines, several frigates and missile boats. Russia has 45 submarines, including 23 nuclear
        what it's true? and everything is "on the go" ??? in my opinion the author overdid it a little ...
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov April 14 2015 06: 38
          +3
          Quote: Andrey Yurievich
          In my opinion, the author has overdid it slightly ..

          Yes, this is from Vicki infa, he did not even bother to ask how many of them are on the move.
    3. Alexanderrr
      Alexanderrr April 14 2015 06: 44
      +3
      Quote: anakonda
      The author of the article looks like a little boy in a dark room smile all the time it seems that someone is about to attack, some monster will definitely appear wassat .

      And in my opinion, a sober assessment of the situation. Judging by the level of anti-Russian hysteria and the lack of common sense in the publications of pro-Western media, a military scenario is quite possible. Of course, I wouldn’t like the war and we won’t start it, but we will be able to answer - it will not seem enough to anyone.
    4. Simon
      Simon April 14 2015 07: 03
      +6
      Listen, my friend! Russia does not want war, we have lost so many people in the Second World War. The Americans surround us with military bases on all sides, start a military hysteria in the Baltic countries, no one likes the fact that Russia is so big and we have a lot of unused resources in the bowels and surface of our land. For centuries, Europeans have attacked us, now they wanted to enslave, then cut off from the seas, then destroy. So what can we talk about, since NATO is created for this. These small countries need land, and Americans need military markets and mineral resources. Yes, we do not want war, but our armored train is on the siding and we need to keep gunpowder dry.
    5. Hell's Angel
      Hell's Angel 8 July 2015 14: 21
      0
      We just have a good memory.
      The USSR and NATO already had common borders. True, NATO was then called the Third Reich and we very well remember what it cost us. At that time, the United States was waiting for who would win, for that and "harness", and now decided to lead this business.
  4. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 April 14 2015 06: 09
    0
    must be warned at the highest level that they will be the very first target for the strategic nuclear forces of the Russian Federation


    Yes, they perfectly understand and know. But such warnings, especially at the official level, await like manna from heaven. It’s just one more time to shout that we warned about the aggressive aspirations of Russia.
  5. Gorvas
    Gorvas April 14 2015 06: 13
    +6
    poplar with an inscription on the head:
    - for Vilnius, Riga, Warsaw, donkey, etc.
    make a report and show what the risks are!
  6. Tatar 174
    Tatar 174 April 14 2015 06: 14
    +5
    Tension in the world has been and will always be, as long as there is the USA with its aggressive policy towards all, without exception. Russia is only an excuse for them, and the main goal is to subjugate all countries to itself and thus create a sales market and a raw material market for its economy, regardless of the population of these countries. They will not be able to subjugate Russia and its allies, China will not be able to either, but in impotent spite, they are trying to achieve their goals by deceiving and blackmailing their supposedly allies.
  7. Moore
    Moore April 14 2015 06: 16
    +5
    If the movement begins, the ports and airfields of the Baltic "tigers" should be blocked in any case - the striped ones with their iron should not land there.
    And the corridor to the Kaliningrad region, yes, we have to break through. Otherwise it will be like Anisimov's in the first book "Abrams in Khimki".
  8. Dimy4
    Dimy4 April 14 2015 06: 19
    +2
    I don’t know if all these hysterical states have enough brains (if any) to realize that attacking the Kaliningrad region, they will attack all of Russia with all the consequences, as they say, of shooting, flying and sailing the seas for themselves.
    1. Simon
      Simon April 14 2015 07: 10
      +3
      So these countries have all the brains in Washington! What they say there, then they respond with a deed. An example is Ukraine.
    2. aleks26
      aleks26 30 June 2015 15: 36
      0
      Quote: Dimy4
      I don’t know if all these hysterical states have enough brains (

      Nope, not enough. There, already someone was indignant at retaliatory sanctions. Type them for what? They say they have the right, since Russia invaded Ukraine. So it is here. They are for what to bomb. This is Russia, the aggressor.
  9. horizont05
    horizont05 April 14 2015 06: 20
    +4
    More and more often we are reminded of the war. You have to be ready. Kaliningrad will be the first to take the blow.
  10. holod19
    holod19 April 14 2015 06: 22
    +2
    In my opinion, the constant exercises of our Armed Forces and their condition cause panic in the USA, NATO and the geyropu! But the danger emanating from them is real! True, the answer will be LLC very tough!
    1. Simon
      Simon April 14 2015 07: 13
      +1
      Our army must be prepared for any situation and must "keep the powder dry." soldier
  11. Ivan Tarasov
    Ivan Tarasov April 14 2015 06: 26
    0
    Switzerland should be the number one target, there is a base at the GP.
  12. saag
    saag April 14 2015 06: 26
    0
    Yes, again, this nuclear hysteria, a repetition of the past or something, or Shiza vulgaris?
  13. The comment was deleted.
  14. forester
    forester April 14 2015 06: 52
    +3
    I put point No. 9 to the vote - I'm for it! It would be nice to hear this in the first person of the state. It will cool many, and then something small sevyavki again spread apart. Placing American missiles at home - you will be guaranteed destroyed. You see, a couple more countries will think, not all the same in Europe, the Baltic states are accented on the last syllable.
  15. smith7
    smith7 April 14 2015 06: 56
    +3
    Why are you all nervous, comrades? War will be, how not to be! The hegemony of the United States is weakening, the brain of Europeans is dirtied by the project "Putin makes the USSR-2", everyone is actively updating their arsenals. As soon as they calm themselves down in America that the missile defense system will protect them from a nuclear retaliatory strike in 2020, they will begin to "prick with an awl in the ass" of Romanians, Poles, Swedes, Balts and Finns. Those will slowly trample. This will be the beginning ... Then everyone will immediately get teeth, progressive humanity will be indignant and then the whole world will be trampled on. Well, maybe it won't. But it will be. How not to be? Russia is a huge tidbit, on which the "golden billion" can flourish for a hundred years at the expense of mineral resources and intellectually developed slaves. We cannot be defeated in battle, they know about it too. But the worst thing is if they conquer us by brainwashing, make us think that we, Russians, citizens of the world, are the freest and most tolerant advanced consumers of high-tech goods in the world. Here the khan will come for us ... In this direction, we can not do it ...
  16. kuz363
    kuz363 April 14 2015 07: 06
    +1
    "All countries located not far from Russia and hosting US missile defense elements should be warned at the highest level that they will be the very first target for the strategic nuclear forces of the Russian Federation."
    Nonsense of the author. Why spend strategic nuclear forces on close targets when it is necessary to withdraw from the agreement on the RSD and apply them? In addition, there is TNW.
  17. Sergey Sitnikov
    Sergey Sitnikov April 14 2015 07: 08
    +4
    The mind does not hear - knock on the liver! It would be necessary to create and deploy tactical nuclear missiles, 3-4 supersonic missiles, ground-to-ground, with the names - "Sunrise over Suomi", "Poltava", "PshikPolsha", etc.
  18. silver169
    silver169 April 14 2015 07: 23
    +5
    Additional deployment of Iskander in the Kaliningrad and Murmansk regions will drastically cool the violent Baltic-Finnish-Swedish heads.
    1. ATATA
      ATATA 6 May 2015 11: 20
      0
      Quote: silver169
      Additional deployment of Iskander in the Kaliningrad and Murmansk regions will drastically cool the violent Baltic-Finnish-Swedish heads.

      A nuclear strike on Wellington will abruptly cool your desire to lick the butt, the Anglo-Saxons, New Zealand Ch-M-O!
  19. EvgNik
    EvgNik April 14 2015 07: 41
    +4
    "" All countries located near Russia and hosting US missile defense elements should be warned at the highest level that they will be the very first target for the strategic nuclear forces of the Russian Federation. "

    And in my opinion, first of all, it is necessary to warn the states that they will be the first and main target. At the highest level warn. For this, they deploy bases around Russia in order to survive. They don’t give a damn about Eurasia. And here they will regret themselves, beloved ones. In general, the article +. Explains some points.
  20. Alcoholic
    Alcoholic April 14 2015 07: 46
    -3
    There is no fist there.
    A bunch of gays and blacks
    GEEV and this should not be forgotten :)
  21. Neophyte
    Neophyte April 14 2015 07: 54
    +3
    The article is written at a high level with accurate information.
    Kaliningrad ledge - as a goal should become a powerful fist for those
    who dreams of a new European campaign against Russia! In any case,
    The western military district must be continuously strengthened. The enemy is on the borders of Russia!
  22. figter
    figter April 14 2015 08: 08
    +1
    The article is not bad. But the author did not disclose the theme of the terrain and its conditions. At the same time, the picture was more capacious. The marshy mountain-woodland does not allow the full use of armored vehicles. The fighting will be scattered in the directions. But the amount of armored vehicles allows in these areas to create the necessary density before the approach of NATO forces for both defense and offensive operations. Undoubtedly, the main task of such forces is to conduct preemptive missile and air strikes against the border garrisons of the RF Armed Forces, sabotage work, disruption of mobilization, and demoralization of the local population. Prior to the NATO forces approaching, they will hold down separate groups of the Russian Armed Forces and, using airborne and mountain-infantry units and formations in cooperation with aviation, they will strive to launch strikes from the rear, blocking communications lines and preventing our formations from withdrawing.
    1. figter
      figter April 14 2015 12: 47
      0
      Well, explain to me, the one who put the minus, what common ideas did you follow?
    2. zubkoff46
      zubkoff46 April 14 2015 22: 05
      +1
      I put you a plus, do not worry. One can feel the military education at the level of the Frunze Academy. The scenario of possible events is correctly and clearly set out.
  23. 71rus
    71rus April 14 2015 08: 16
    +2
    "But if in most EU countries there are relatively neutral forces calling for reconciliation, then in the Scandinavian and Baltic countries the line towards Russia is maximally radical and destructive." (from)
    Western Europe
    And again, Obama and his comrades want to rake the heat with their own hands! It did not work to provoke Western Europe, they are rocking Scandinavia.
  24. NUR
    NUR April 14 2015 09: 52
    +1
    Surprisingly, with the opinion of the peoples of these countries no one is considered everything decides the so-called minority is not the most intelligent but corrupt. The main question is how to force a corrupt minority to fulfill the will of the people.
  25. ava09
    ava09 April 14 2015 10: 11
    0
    "Nevertheless, humanity, as history shows, cannot exist for a long time without wars - and there have not been (large) wars in Europe since 1945."
    I consider provocation or stupidity to call capitalism humanity. Only capitalist predators cannot exist without capturing new markets (countries), that is, without aggression. Question to the author: why does he identify the imposed socio-economic model with humanity itself, or cannot it develop in another paradigm, that is, without war?
  26. NordUral
    NordUral April 14 2015 10: 23
    +2
    They put flags around us like wolves. But guys, the wolf is not so easy to take, especially cornered. Look, do not turn yourself from hunters into game. Not the first time you see such metamorphoses. Or turn on your brain and think - maybe we will be good neighbors?
  27. Igor Polovodov
    Igor Polovodov April 14 2015 10: 31
    +3
    Despite the howl of the satellites, we read "Shavok", sorry for them ... The blow should be focused not on them, but on the United States, then everything around will subside, as if by magic ... There will be Russian order! USA must be destroyed! There is no curse in this spell, but only the collective intention of the world, in the name of preserving states, whose people are not responsible for a bunch of scum exposed by the authorities!
  28. bvi1965
    bvi1965 April 14 2015 10: 52
    +3
    on the territory of Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia, as well as ongoing NATO exercises there, these three countries will become a springboard for NATO forces, including Scandinavian aviation. The geographical location of these countries allows you to simultaneously strike from there ...

    The first to rake and to the fullest ... am
  29. Stiks881
    Stiks881 April 14 2015 10: 58
    0
    You didn’t understand our submarine delivered the diapers to the Swedes for the army, or else yours ended already !!!!!! wink laughing
  30. TOR2
    TOR2 April 14 2015 11: 20
    +3
    Cool Scandinavian boys need to be cooled. To begin with, the oil derricks of Norway should be the first target. (With all the consequences for the star-blue flag). To reinforce the Scandinavian thrill, deliver magic containers so that the whole fish floats with its belly to the top. And finally, make a list of all the dangerous objects in Scandinavia for their destruction by tactical nuclear warheads. But after this, you can ask yourself, how long will their combined forces last? And in the future, will Scandinavian boys have to bite the Scandinavian stones from hunger?
  31. sieras
    sieras April 14 2015 11: 35
    +2
    well, if they didn’t eat war on their territory, then at least it will be possible to bomb indiscriminately. Do not mark the square with tens of square meters so as not to hurt something of your own. and outline the area on the map where the pilots can bomb.
  32. donechin1
    donechin1 April 14 2015 12: 00
    -2
    You understand what can happen, if God forbid, something happens to Putin either !!!!!!!
    1. Hell's Angel
      Hell's Angel 8 July 2015 19: 07
      0
      So what? There will simply be elections for a new president.
  33. Sanechek26
    Sanechek26 April 14 2015 12: 28
    +1
    For some reason, the author forgot about the northern fleet of the Russian Federation, which will certainly break into the countries of Scandinavia, Belarus also cannot be swept aside - in case of a big mess, they cannot help but get involved. So the alignment of forces is not quite as described in the article. On the part of the adversary, allied forces are examined, but on our part not. Not quite the right approach.
  34. andrey.trykov
    andrey.trykov April 14 2015 12: 57
    +1
    I would like to remind the s.r.a.s.i.m. of the Vikings that Norway was liberated by the Red Army, and indeed the whole of Europe, by the way and Ukraine too. (I write with a small letter intentionally)
  35. Alexey-74
    Alexey-74 April 14 2015 13: 07
    +1
    There should be at least two operational directions. North-West and West. The northern neighbors are unlikely to dare to attack themselves ... without a "roof" from Germany, France, England. I'm not talking about the South direction. All are repeated - they surround us from all sides and will attack unambiguously all in a crowd from all sides. The nearest footholds of hostilities will unleash from Poland and the Baltic countries. The article describes only one direction - North. They are calculating the scenario - if Russia attacks first. But everyone understands perfectly well that if a war starts, strikes should be expected from all sides. And the United States, I am sure Japan will also not stand aside. Russia simply needs to be strengthened by aviation, long-range and medium-range missiles. actions and of course the rest of the troops ...
  36. Sailor
    Sailor April 14 2015 13: 43
    +1
    It is alarming that Finland and Sweden are getting closer to NATO.
  37. Yugra
    Yugra April 14 2015 13: 54
    +1
    In the event of a collision, we will no longer have to save the "great heritage of mankind" Dresden, Krakow, etc. from our destructive blows. Just wipe the whole geyrope off the face of the earth.
  38. Gag
    Gag April 14 2015 14: 05
    0
    I think that if NATO forces cross the Russian border, it’s enough to open missile mines, then the number of bricks that NATO will put down will be enough to build a Chinese wall in three rows
  39. sergei loginov
    sergei loginov April 14 2015 14: 20
    +2
    Ready to share secret information with VO Officers
    -USA Hillary Clinton. Russia must be exposed
    nuclear strike.
    -Question from the audience, is Mrs. Clinton ready to fulfill
    Monica Livinsky's functions in relation to Pskov or
    Tula Airborne Divisions.
    - Gentlemen, the mistake of translation, vigorous support.
  40. Budilnik
    Budilnik April 14 2015 17: 23
    0
    You can’t do without TNW
  41. 16112014nk
    16112014nk April 14 2015 17: 48
    -1
    Quote: Ivan Tarasov
    Switzerland should be the number one target, there is a base at the GP.

    Switzerland will soon be gone. They also have a LHC there, which was recently launched at full capacity. Now they themselves wonder how they did it. Hence the conclusion-question: when will they, to put it mildly, fuck, or, to put it bluntly ... no? And this is where the "excrement" ends, because when it’s gone, no one will be left there, and there will be no one to be interested in the results of the experiment! And the whole of Europe will be in question. And scientists, they are such comrades, will go to the logical end!
  42. Redfox3k
    Redfox3k April 15 2015 01: 14
    0
    I left to dig a bunker ....
  43. Cipollino
    Cipollino 14 May 2015 13: 36
    0
    I do not really understand what kind of nuclear strike from Russia can we talk about? And how can you seriously discuss this? It is not necessary to remind that not only the Russian Federation has this very weapon and in the event of a retaliatory strike it will not seem enough to anyone, then this will begin. But that's not what I mean. Considering that children, families, relatives of our rulers live in Europe and the United States, they themselves have real estate and accounts there, tell me - who will carry out a nuclear strike against the "northern fists" and other European countries ??? It seems to me that as soon as there is a proposal for an attack from some zealous warrior, as soon as his colleagues, who felt a threat to their children, families, accounts and real estate, will simply "put to sleep"))).
  44. polkovnik manuch
    polkovnik manuch 26 May 2015 09: 23
    0
    Fresh giving, but hard to believe! - Probably it is necessary to react in this way to the article. As they say: "It was smooth on paper, but they forgot about the ravines!" They tried to share the Russian Bear's fur coat more than once, the result is always the same. I think an attempt to fight with Russia is an empty idea, despite the damage that the shitcrats over the past 20 years and Mishka-tagged before have caused the country. It must be understood that if the war is nevertheless unleashed, it will be the most terrible and longest in the history of mankind, of course, it will be fought for a very long time and with varying degrees of success. CONCLUSION: The United States will shit on Russia all the time, but they will not unleash the war, in the near future they will have enough of their internal problems (the same Ielonstone problem, problems with African Americans, problems of Hispanic territories, etc.), Europe will also soon have no time for the "Russian threat", since the threat of Islamization and Islamic radicalization is more serious and relevant. Therefore, Europe will very soon look for an alliance with Russia in solving this problem.
  45. aleks.29ru
    aleks.29ru 9 June 2015 23: 24
    0
    which tanks? which ships? a nuclear strike on capitals will stop any conflict.
  46. DimYang
    DimYang 30 June 2015 05: 42
    0
    To begin with, the Constitution needs to be amended - THE RULE OF THE NATIONAL LAW OVER INTERNATIONAL. Then we can change a lot, very quickly.
  47. Anchonsha
    Anchonsha 24 July 2015 12: 23
    0
    The article is normal, everything puts in its place. The Russians should know what is happening at our borders and not act because before the start of the Second World War and 1941, when Stalin forbade such a thing in the media so as not to provoke Hitler. And the Scandinavians should know what awaits them. But it’s a pity that the Scandinavian media prohibit such articles in their own countries, and all that is being done in Russia and our position in the world. And in order to warn us of the possibility of starting a war in a geyropa, it is necessary to neutralize the global blow of the United States, to show that their missile defense created in the geyropa is powerless against our weapons. Mattresses are afraid of someone else's strength and retaliation of Russia. And besides, geyropa now has a completely different headache - what to do with immigrants from Africa. I am afraid that they will begin to harness Russia here too, to send part of them to us.