Iranian ships off the coast of the United States?

65
Iranian ships off the coast of the United States?


A sensational statement was recently made by the commander of the naval forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Habibollah Sayari. He said that in response to the American insinuations to force Iran to curtail its peaceful nuclear program and due to the increased US naval presence in the Persian Gulf and the Indian Ocean, the Iranian fleet could head to the east coast of the United States. In addition, the ships of the Iranian Navy will enter the Gulf of Aden to ensure their strategic interests. Sayari said that Iran is not going to act as an obedient sheep when its people are in real danger. He called the USA a world gendarme who intervenes everywhere to resolve issues that are advantageous to him.

Such a statement would seem like ordinary bravado, because the ships of the Islamic Republic have been actively “not walking the seas” for more than 30 years. But the words of Mr. Sayari are already supported by certain facts. So, for the first time since 1979-year, the ships of the Iranian Navy passed the Suez Canal and entered the Mediterranean Sea.

Against the background of this maritime cold war between Iran and the United States, the President of Iran spoke out from the rostrum of the UN General Assembly and put a real obstruction on everything connected with America. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said that the Americans, instead of pointing the way of their further development to other countries of the world, should remember the bloody pages of their stories: nuclear attack on Japan in 1945, mass removal of slaves from Africa, thousands of murders of civilians in Libya. This speech made the American delegation leave the hall, although, in fact, the words of the Iranian president, despite all their emotions, expressed obvious facts about the foreign policy of the United States over the past decades.

So, Iran actually threatened the United States with the fact that it could at any moment strike back at US military and industrial facilities. At the same time, the Iranian authorities have declared that their country is not the aggressor, and will decide to use extreme measures only when it will be attacked by the enemy. At the same time, the main enemies of Iran, according to Ahmadinejad, Khamenei and Sayari, are the USA and Israel.

Let us try to imagine what might happen if the United States decides to strike at Iran. Draw a diagram of possible military events.

Firstly, Iran can simply block the Strait of Hormuz by barring the American fleet in the Persian Gulf to be torn to pieces by new Zelzal and Shahab missiles. No matter how powerful the fifth US fleet may be, it will be in a strategically hopeless situation. To the rescue of the fifth fleet other naval forces will be abandoned, which may well be met by the very ships in the Mediterranean. Let's not forget that Sayyari promised to bring the fleet to the Atlantic borders of the United States. And this, whatever one may say, is a direct security threat to American citizens. In the end, Iranian ships can simply tightly close the Suez Canal, and then there can be no question of naval assistance to the stuck fifth US fleet in the Persian Gulf.

In such a situation, the Americans will try to attack Iran from the air, but Iran has the C-300 complexes, which they managed to buy from Russia in due time, and this is already serious weapon. C-300 can very effectively shoot down American bombers and fighters on its way to the borders of Iran.
Secondly, the world is still unknown about the real nuclear program of Iran. And what if Iran actually has this notorious nuclear weapon? Then the theater of war can turn into a real story from the Apocalypse. By the way, one should not forget that Iran can attack both Israel and American oil rigs in the territory of Bahrain and Qatar. As a result, the Middle East can turn into a real boiler.

Of great interest is the strategy itself operation against Iran. If the Americans want by military means to block the development of Iran’s nuclear program, then they know a priori that Tehran does not and cannot have nuclear weapons. And if the Americans know that such weapons exist, then will they really decide on such a grand adventure as a massive strike on a nuclear power ?! The search for weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, which, by the way, has not been discovered so far, has not yet been erased in memory. Meanwhile, the “democratic” Iraq still lies in ruins. Such is Iran’s fate or ...

In general, the confrontation between Iran and the US will not end with anything good for the world community. This is more than obvious. Will both countries have enough sense not to succumb to mutual provocations and stop double-edged reproaches?
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

65 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +20
    2 October 2011 08: 07
    Yes, Iranians have eggs, not like some ...
    1. +7
      2 October 2011 10: 40
      Exactly, and to enhance the impression of the "tough eggs", there is a spectacular picture of the Saar-5 missile corvette of the Israeli Navy, built by the USA. wink
  2. +18
    2 October 2011 08: 13
    This is a conversation! Only in this language is it necessary to speak with our "overloaded partners". It's a pity that Russia forgot this language or sold it ...
    1. +4
      2 October 2011 10: 08
      Kolyan, do not forget that the USSR signed the same non-aggression pact with Germany not from blind faith in the humane image of fascism, but with the goal of delaying the start of the war to build capacity.
    2. L. konstantin
      0
      2 October 2011 12: 14
      HAPPEN SPACES! BEGINNING IN THE YEAR 90
  3. Patriot
    +11
    2 October 2011 08: 34
    Well, at least someone else resists the aggressive policy of the Pindos.
  4. Sergh
    +2
    2 October 2011 08: 34
    Mahmoud well done! He knows that you can’t argue with the S-300 and have already developed air defense tactics for the future. Merikos so far in the big # opera. And time is playing on the Iranian side.
    Oh smart!
  5. mitrich
    0
    2 October 2011 08: 40
    I want to ask users:
    Does everyone have the opportunity to leaf through the latest comments to see them, say, yesterday, or am I the only one in trouble?
    1. Sergh
      0
      2 October 2011 08: 47
      mitrichyes everything is fine, jumping.
      1. mitrich
        0
        2 October 2011 08: 55
        Sergh,
        and what do you click to jump? After all, at the bottom of the page "1,2,3,4,5 ..." no. In any case, I have.
        1. Alexey Prikazchikov
          +4
          2 October 2011 09: 48
          Respect to Iran, these subhuman understand only the language of power well, just like animals. bully
        2. Sergh
          0
          2 October 2011 09: 55
          mitrichu. No, the narrow column on the right of this page is the popular, discussed, recent comments (top to bottom) and here below More
  6. +8
    2 October 2011 09: 55
    All of our elite in Iran, for continuing education.
    1. Tyumen
      +10
      2 October 2011 17: 18
      So, according to Iranian laws, all our elite will remain without hands.
  7. mitrich
    0
    2 October 2011 10: 26
    "More" opens the same page of recent comments.
    This "modernization" is not to my liking, because in order to read ALL comments, you need to climb on every article. And if I was not at home for 2-3 days, then DO NOT read all the comments.
    Admins, make it possible to leaf through the commented pages. Do as it was before.
    1. Sergh
      0
      2 October 2011 10: 49
      Do you have such a deal?

    2. Sergh
      0
      2 October 2011 10: 51
      mitrichy. You can’t reset the picture in PM, it’s full of messages!
      1. 0
        2 October 2011 11: 52
        The maximum number of personal messages that a user can receive and store has increased to 100
    3. 0
      2 October 2011 10: 53
      Such topics should be discussed on the forum and write to the admins on the forum and not in the articles on the site. For this purpose, specially created sections: http://forum.topwar.ru/forum/35-обсуждение-сайта-topwarru/
  8. Bob
    0
    2 October 2011 10: 40
    And I would have brought other excerpts from Ahmadinejad’s speech.

    “... At last year's session, noting the importance of this issue, I suggested calling the current decade a“ decade of joint global governance ”and using all the opportunities to create a united world.
    The arrival of a better and ideal society after the appearance of a perfect person who sincerely and truly loved all people is the firm promise of the Almighty.
    He will appear together with the Hazrat Jesus Christ and, standing at the head of all the righteous, freedom lovers and guardians for justice, will eradicate oppression and discrimination and, raising the level of consciousness and enlightenment of people, will spread peace, justice, freedom and love throughout the Earth. He will give everyone his beauty and kindness and will give everyone a taste from the sweet source of life.
    Today we are witnessing an awakening of the deep essence of peoples. This general upsurge will no longer allow peoples to endure humiliation, oppression and discrimination.
    The great Iranian civilization is ready to lend a hand for a friendly handshake to other nations that have embarked on this beautiful and glorious path, and, within the framework of a collective international will, put all their capabilities into common cooperation.
    Long live love and freedom! Long live justice and conscientiousness! Long live the bright and radiant future of humanity! "

    full speech: http://www.iran.ru/rus/news_iran.php?act=news_by_id&_n=1&news_id=75813
  9. +3
    2 October 2011 10: 43
    .. Iranian Navy ..... threaten the US Navy ........ :-)))))))))))))
    read funny
    1. 0
      2 October 2011 13: 46
      Do not read it funny. Any opponent cannot be underestimated. This, as history shows, is fraught. And Iran is not so bluffing.
  10. Bob
    +3
    2 October 2011 11: 10
    Iran has a peculiar structure of the armed forces. In addition to conventional armed forces, there are separate paramilitary groups - the Corps of Guardians of the Islamic Revolution (IRGC), equipped and equipped not worse, but better, they include aviation and armored forces and naval forces. As part of the IRGC, the KODS units are responsible for sabotage. Iran understands the weakness of its military potential, and therefore relies on future divisions of the KODS in the future struggle. Numerous mobile groups of saboteurs know in advance who their enemy is and have clearly set goals both in the Persian Gulf region (primarily the Gulf of Aden) and beyond. The possibility of using a dirty atomic bomb by these units is not just technically possible, it is more than likely. American generals, staffers planning operations against Iran, call the war with Iran crazy, knowing full well how Iran can respond to the US operation.
    Therefore, the operation was postponed all the time, the attempt of the Arab revolution in Iran also failed, Iran is not an authoritarian state with a president, parliament, this regime is not on clay feet. The Persians knew how and are able to fight. It is not in vain that Iran is positioning itself as the center of the Islamic world, in contrast to a democratic Turkey, which acts with an eye on the United States and Europe, it is part of NATO.
    Russia is very interested in stability in Central Asia, the Caucasus, the Middle East, because the main threats to its security come from there. With the fall of Iran, truly destructive processes will unfold throughout the post-Soviet space.
    The question is why did Medvedev curtail military-technical cooperation with Iran, contrary to the position of our diplomatic department? After all, the S-300 would guarantee stability in the region.
    1. 0
      2 October 2011 13: 48
      For the sake of its patrons from the United States.
      1. Tyumen
        0
        2 October 2011 16: 46
        What other patrons? And 080808go he went against them or what?
  11. BOSS
    -4
    2 October 2011 11: 22
    Let's see what the Pindos will do when the Iranian boats sail to the coast of the U.S. Pindos will meet them, I have no doubt about this. Mutual provocations (from the Pindos’s side for sure) begin. The main thing is that Iran does not succumb to it.
    1. +1
      2 October 2011 23: 25
      Iranian boats off the coast of the United States can only sail to the bottom, and look at them, it will be possible, except for divers. wink
  12. 0
    2 October 2011 11: 43
    But did Milosevic have anything to do with 300?
    1. BOSS
      -2
      2 October 2011 11: 45
      And what were they? Or in Yugoslavia few planes were beaten down?
    2. 0
      2 October 2011 22: 24
      the Yugoslavs had only two divisions C 300v, and the Americans knew the frequencies of suppression ... (if that tells you something).
      1. ytqnhfk
        0
        2 October 2011 23: 41
        What year ? If 99 then this is !! because the stealth was shot down with s-125 pechora and logically in the subsequent conflict they could not buy s-300 because they simply would not be sold to them !!!
  13. L. konstantin
    0
    2 October 2011 12: 18
    who creates these provocative articles! in the us, the fleet is in my opinion the strongest in the world and iran there is like a needle in hay! I'm generally scared for the future of Russia! fucking again, only rifles do not fight!
    1. 0
      2 October 2011 12: 21
      And what is the provocation expressed?
    2. 0
      2 October 2011 13: 52
      If it’s really scary and unbearable - a sheet and in the cemetery, look for a free dimple. The article is the most normal and relevant. There would be more of them. Maybe he would read one of them in tandem and would not be foolish to engage in foreign policy.
  14. L. konstantin
    +7
    2 October 2011 12: 38
    pilots, unlike ours, do not wipe the plane! but they are fighting really! skill is being developed! and Russia, as always, is conservative and liberal! -removed mat- we will soon come to a place with a laurel and Putin corrupt!

    can minus to usera! but i'm right

    vote for united Russia!

    do not you see??? that everything stops with us! and Abramovich buys a yacht that will not turn around in the Volga and Putin to Kabaev! general chaos! power is passed from hand to hand! Senseol to go to the polls !? when you know who will win !!! generally fuck Russian people I do not understand, be patient!

    yes minus! stupid people! with Russian weapons that DO NOT HAVE ANALOGUES IN THE WORLD! shkolota! and we will draw everything that was created by fathers and grandfathers! and then what the fuck will we make a mace to shoot!) Pindos have long overtaken us! in everything!
    1. 0
      2 October 2011 12: 59
      I will ask you not to express obscenities and insult anyone!
    2. BOSS
      -2
      2 October 2011 13: 07
      So go hang yourself, Pindos close.
      1. 0
        2 October 2011 13: 58
        These do not hang. They give advice to others.
    3. 0
      2 October 2011 13: 57
      He’s so smart, he knows a lot of words. He reads gossip, but they don’t always do the weather. At the same time, they show that the person is not quite friends with the head. So do not pay attention to it.
    4. Volkhov
      +2
      2 October 2011 14: 39
      The Russians now have no head - all their great forces are controlled by Zionists, who fear only the seizure of Nazi rule. The Russians create and maintain the nuclear complex, but do not manage it - pure auxiliary facilities. So it is with money and with politics. Think about how to grow your head.
    5. Tyumen
      0
      2 October 2011 16: 49
      NOT HAVING AN ANALOGUES IN THE WORLD! shkolota!

      Probably an academician.
  15. Russian officer
    +3
    2 October 2011 13: 42
    L. konstantin
    Your indignation at the processes that are happening in my country is understandable. It also hurts.
    And I will go to the polls. And I will vote even for the devil himself, but not for EdRo. I think that I am not alone. Fortunately, most of the people on this site really root for the past, present and future of Russia. And EdRo will one day "go to explore the Russian north." As you understand, I put it mildly, so to speak, "cut sharp corners."
  16. Dovmont
    +3
    2 October 2011 14: 06
    In the end, Iranian ships can simply close the Suez Canal tightly, and then there can be no question of naval assistance to the stuck US fifth fleet in the Persian Gulf.

    How can Iran lock the 5th US fleet in the Persian Gulf? What is your fleet? If one American Aegis-equipped cruiser has the power of a small formation, what about an entire fleet? The author here confuses emotions with reality. Yes, Iran has the Soviet Sunbird anti-ship missiles that everyone is afraid of, including amers - but Iran has these ground-based missiles. Therefore, the Americans do not come close to the Iranian shores. Now, if only the Iranians had the same missiles on ships, then the danger for the 5th would have increased stronger. But again, for this, it is necessary to equip a dozen destroyers with such a system. Iran won't have that many ships.
    1. Tyumen
      0
      2 October 2011 17: 28
      For this, Iran has a dozen or two missile boats, not counting corvettes, destroyers, minesweepers, frigates and landing ships. Plus three low-noise submarines.
      1. Jaguar
        0
        4 October 2011 21: 47
        frigates and destroyers do not really reach modern corvettes
    2. +2
      2 October 2011 22: 28
      How can Iran lock up the 5th US Navy in the Persian Gulf?

      Mosquito fleet, as a variant, land-based anti-ship complexes, the same martyrs on motorboats or on small tankers. There are many options ...
    3. Jaguar
      0
      4 October 2011 22: 33
      Yes, it’s a muddy matter if Iran has mosquitoes at all. Any RCC target designation with something sensible (Ka-25Ts, Tu-95RTs or satellites) is nothing to give
  17. +3
    2 October 2011 18: 48
    I am for Iran! At least someone can answer with this ue ... m! In the place of our government, they would have sold more S-300s! In general, to sign an agreement to Iran with Syria, according to which the country that was attacked is "harnessed"! then these American crap are too nimble ...
  18. +1
    2 October 2011 21: 43
    Here I am for such Muslim brothers, not that our trash is suburban! IRAN forward !!! bully
    1. 0
      2 October 2011 21: 50
      Let’s hand over to the Iranians, all banana republics will put x% on us !!!!
  19. -1
    2 October 2011 21: 55
    while the power of the nerds will hand over everyone, one pleases forever it will not last "power is not in money, brother. Power is in truth."
  20. Mesniy
    -3
    2 October 2011 21: 56
    To all fans of Iran: before spitting saliva in a puppy's delight that a pug yapped at an elephant, you must realize that for the ruling regime in Iran you are the wrong dogs, who must be either destroyed or converted to the "true" faith and live by the laws Sharia with stoning, cutting off hands and other slag. And this is not implemented only because there is little strength.
    By the way, a large part of the dushmans who were killing our soldiers in Agan - was based and prepared in your beloved Iran. And they had a hand in Chechnya. And all sorts of radical Islamic organizations in Russia receive financial and ideological support from Iran.
    So before you carry this * ed - you need to think a little with your brains.
    Muslim fundamentalism is Russia's most terrible enemy, and Iran is its ideological inspirer.
    And with your enthusiastic hooting, you insult the memory of the fallen in the fight against this evil.
    1. Don
      +2
      3 October 2011 14: 32
      Before you spray your Pindosian saliva on the monitor, which would include the brains of which you are just missing. The Iranian so-called regime never made radical Islamic statements to Christian states and never made statements about converting someone to their faith. tell tales about Iranians who killed Soviet soldiers in Afghanistan and Chechnya to your children.
      1. Ivan35
        +3
        3 October 2011 20: 29
        In the difficult years of "perestroika and democratization" - the Taliban, with the support of Pakistan and the Pendos (by the way, according to the Pendos project - they themselves have admitted many times - they planned a blow to the belly of the USSR) advanced to the north - and held back Masud and Dostum. "ours" were helped by Russia, Kazakhstan and Iran. Iran invested - I read about this many times in different sources

        Secondly, now Armenia is "cut off" from its allies by the ODKB - Iran is one of the supply routes

        Mesny is turning everything upside down so that we "confuse" enemies and friends - fundamentalists and terrorists are sponsored by the states and the Saudis - and they did the packs - they seem to have stopped now

        On the main enemy in the east - the Saudi princes - they had a hand in the collapse of the USSR - and they are also enemies to Iran - we have the same enemies with the Persians - and the Persians, unlike us, call them openly and by name - and do not call them the air defense exercises against "terrorists"
      2. oper66
        0
        4 October 2011 03: 35
        the head of state does not preside and the ayatols are spiritual leaders and we are giaurs for them and they don’t care so long as they need us they are temperate but the situation will change that he will be Ahmedijak himself in the balance and if the ayatols are rejected he will be hanged and the Islamists have rich experience in dealing with the Saxons
    2. oper66
      0
      4 October 2011 03: 30
      + I completely agree with you on this fact that the policy of supporting Iran by Russia should be moderately sufficient to divert the forces and means of NATO and US structures, Iran has never been a full-fledged ally to us, and it will be stronger and even more dangerous than NATO and China together there are enough claims only for the Caspian, and when he is with Yao, the Saxons can outplay and impose him on a torpedo to Russia, they love it and know how, without soap, Islamists will fit in and take root there
    3. Evil Tatar
      0
      6 October 2011 14: 42
      Yes-ah-ah, Mesny, you can’t argue with you here ... Although you don’t need to teach the present PEOPLE ...
      Exactly! With "duzi" you have to keep your ear on the alert ...
      Although, I liked the rhetoric of part of the speech of Ahmaddinizhad!
      Mesny, about the ear, refers to you ...
  21. +1
    2 October 2011 21: 58
    you are for the ruling regime in Iran - the wrong dogs, which should be either destroyed or converted to the "true" faith


    NOT WE AND THE RULING MODE IN RUSSIA
    I'm sitting on the pope, personally bully
    1. Mesniy
      -4
      2 October 2011 22: 03
      By the way, in Iran, a priest was sentenced to death the other day only for refusing to convert to Islam.
  22. Mesniy
    +2
    2 October 2011 22: 02
    no, all "infidels" !!! And you, well, if you are not a radical Muslim of course.
    1. 0
      2 October 2011 22: 15
      you place on the forumHouse-2, and here are the patriots !!!!
  23. Uncle Sam
    -2
    2 October 2011 22: 21
    shitty patriot, you’re ready to glorify the centuries-old enemy of your country. Russia has long fought the Persians with Iran. Well, and then, and now they are ideologically destroying Russia
    1. -1
      2 October 2011 22: 23
      go to the usa !!!!!
      1. +1
        2 October 2011 22: 29
        but I like this new curse! request
      2. Mesniy
        -1
        3 October 2011 10: 44
        In the USA, if necessary, I’ll go without your snot, but if you have no arguments and nothing to say, keep quiet, otherwise the silhouette on a nickname is like a man, but you’re behaving like a woman.
        On the street for this you would immediately be given a tambourine.
      3. oper66
        0
        4 October 2011 03: 39
        remember Griboedov, his fate as the Ambassador of Russia to Iran, and then talk to you Libya brothers with Egypt and how many times they betrayed all of them graze for profit
    2. +3
      2 October 2011 22: 28
      hto destroys a simple Iranian? simple Chechen with his surrender of sheep? or am I with my garden with a bowler !! ??? what are you talking about?
      1. Mesniy
        -1
        3 October 2011 11: 00
        Well, the fact that you are a gardener is simple.
        But "a simple Iranian and a simple Chechen" after the muetzin yells like a donkey from the minaret, they go to the mosque, where the mullah tells them that they need to go in jihad against the infidels, the shuravi and "ordinary sheep" like you. To cut the glory of Allah, the merciful and merciful. And ordinary Iranians and ordinary Chechens, as well as all sorts of ordinary Muslims from different regions of Russia with brainwashed fundamentalists, go and cut in the mountains and cities of the Caucasus, blow up houses and metro and airports in Moscow.
        And you and your kind "simple rams" happily bleat to their spiritual leader and inspirer - Iran.
        I repeat once again, and who knows Muslims not by the vegetable stalls of Moscow will understand me- ALL WRONG for them are always second-class people, like animals, and for fundamentalist Muslims, ALL WRONG are worse than ANIMALS, AND KILLING THEM MEANS TO DIRECT THE ROAD TO ALLAHU,
        And you apparently didn’t understand yet that, with your thoughtless comments, you insult the memory of the victims of the terrorist attacks, the memory of the soldiers killed in Chechnya, the Caucasus and in Agan.
        1. Don
          +3
          3 October 2011 14: 39
          Another Local. For your information, Iran never declared jihad to Russians and Muslims, I saw more of yours, I was on a business trip in Algeria and rested in Egypt. They don’t consider us second grade, even I would say that in Algeria to the Russians (for them, they are all immigrants from the USSR) they respect with respect, but you don’t understand this with your brainwashed by Pindostan.
          1. Mesniy
            -1
            3 October 2011 15: 45
            It’s a pity that you weren’t in the Caucasus at the end of the 90s .... but about Iran you are wrong. And how are they in Sharavalia in Agan ...
            but about Algeria - this is not serious, they needed specialists, and when the muslims need it - they will kiss him in the ass, and it will become unnecessary - they will cut off his head right away. Also in Egypt, you spent the loot there. I’m in Turkey they also looked into the eyes and grabbed by the sleeve and bowed, bowed, and the Chechen fighters there at the same time as at home felt, treated, rested ...
            you and I’ve been campaigning for some years, behave more worthily, I don’t make assumptions about what’s with your brains. And yet, countries have generally accepted names, and it’s stupid to replace them with some kind of nonsense that came up with the near-hysterical and, most importantly, envious people.
            1. Don
              +2
              4 October 2011 11: 09
              I could not be in the Caucasus in the late 90s, because I live in Ukraine, but about Iran, where is your evidence? Give me one precedent. Moreover, during the war in Afghanistan, Iran had a serious war with Iraq, they didn’t have extra people who could be sprayed into the Sunni war. Islamic or Christian country does everything in its interests. It would be foolish to believe that Arabs would love us because we are so good, and not for our help in Soviet times. Until now, they are our trading partners (not all of course). I heard about the Chechen training bases in Turkish Cyprus, but this does not mean that we should comb all Muslims under one comb, the same Syria, Algeria, the UAE are our long-standing partners, and Qatar, although a vassal of Pindos, was one of the initiators creating a gas OPECA. If Russia wants to win the geopolitical game, we need to know who to help and for how long and who not. Iran and Syria we still need as a counterbalance to the Saudis, the United States and Israel in the Middle East. They can be supplied with S-300, Bastions , Shells, but only a limited number, so that Iran does not turn into a Middle East Terminator. In addition, Iran, unlike Libya, regularly pays for the supply of weapons.
    3. Don
      +1
      3 October 2011 14: 33
      Maybe we then consider the Mongols as enemies, because. have we long fought with them? you have logic.
  24. Mikula
    +6
    2 October 2011 22: 53
    In the event of a conflict with the United States, the time of the blockade, as well as the time of the existence of the Iranian fleet, will exactly correspond to the time of the arrival of American anti-ship missiles. And what about the eggs was said so these are not eggs, but rash Islamic languages. Listen to them, so they have already defeated everyone, and especially Israel.
  25. -1
    2 October 2011 23: 39
    that in vain we freed Jews from concentration camps in due time!)
  26. kostya
    -1
    3 October 2011 05: 46
    Most of all I liked that Iranian ships can lock up the Amer fleet in the Persian Gulf and shoot everyone. Let this statement be afraid of the Americans.
    1. oper66
      +2
      4 October 2011 03: 43
      at one time the Suez Canal locked Egypt by simply flooding several watercraft in it and the whole paragraph
  27. +2
    3 October 2011 14: 15
    if Iranian ships head for the Atlantic, they will write most of all in boiling water, for joy, in the US State Department, they don’t already know what they need to come up with, what kind of enemy to find, so that Durak Obama and taxpayers do not cut their budget, AND THERE IS SUCH A GIFT !! !!!!!!
  28. 0
    6 October 2011 16: 44
    America is a bitch tribe, soon it will destroy itself
    1. Mesniy
      -1
      6 October 2011 22: 28
      this your "saying" shows that you are a very young son.
      That I had days left to the West, I heard from the moment I started talking, only the country in which these guys have been driving for more than 20 years has merged into the toilet bowl of history. And many of those who believed in this leaf then believed now live in the West, and you will not return here under pain of death.
  29. Slim
    +2
    7 October 2011 20: 15
    It will be necessary to help Iran and destroy the United States smile
  30. Russian
    +1
    8 October 2011 08: 15
    the world still does not know anything about the real nuclear program of Iran

    The world does not know, but Russia even knows very well (we won’t tell anyone!), It’s not for nothing that we built a nuclear power station in Bushehr for them ... wink
  31. 0
    11 October 2011 07: 43
    this is so little protest of Iran against the US policy in its relations
  32. +2
    23 October 2011 17: 44
    The more Iranians put up pendos, the less Russian Ivan will wave a bayonet.
    Anyone who is not against us in a foreign country with pendosia is with us and for us.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"