Ultra-precise "Speed" and the invisible "Courier"

Ultra-precise "Speed" and the invisible "Courier"

September 12 on the website of the Federal Space Agency appeared an ordinary, at first glance, a message from the category of those that usually the general public does not read. Under the heading "News»Announced the opening of tenders for the right to conclude government contracts. By lot number 43, the subject of the contract with the deadlines for implementation in October 2011 - December 2012 was “the elimination of solid-propellant rocket engines and charges of intercontinental ballistic missiles (KMB) of the Kurier, Speed, Topol-M missile systems and ballistic missiles for submarines boats (SLBM) "Bark".


With the third and fourth names in this list, everything seems to be clear - they are constantly on the ear, as well as "Yars" and "Mace". Topol-M is a mine or mobile-based missile system. The RK is equipped with Tatishchevskoye mines and the Teikov formations of the Strategic Missile Forces are mobile. The expert community and journalists recalled about the Bark SLBM whenever there were problems with the Bulava (God forbid that there are no more). But what courier and speed missiles are (the latter mistakenly called an ICBM in the tender announcement) is known to a very limited circle of specialists. But both these “products” and the people who created them deserve a detailed story. Although information about these unique rockets developed by the Moscow Institute of Thermal Engineering (MIT) in open sources is very difficult to find.

Not needed

The medium-range solid-fuel ballistic missile (MRSD) “Speed” was designed under the direction of the director and chief designer of MIT Alexander Nadiradze from 1982 of the year. It was intended for arming the Strategic Missile Forces and the Ground Forces. It was supposed to be used to defeat enemy targets in European theaters of military operations using both nuclear and conventional warheads.

The creation of the next mobile “invisible” MIT ended in 1986-m. The flight tests of the “executioner of Europe” began on March 1, 1987, at the Kapustin Yar test site - they made one test launch of a missile. After that, according to the decision of the rulers of the USSR of that time, in connection with the preparation of the future Soviet-American Treaty on the Destruction of Ballistic Missiles of Medium and Short Range 7 in March of 1987, further work on “Speed” turned.

This MRBM really could hold all potential targets in Europe. She had a maximum range of four thousand kilometers. Its main know-how was a unique control system, which allowed, speaking in rocketry slang, to get into the stake, which was created by the Moscow Research Institute of Automation and Instrumentation, headed by Nikolai Pilyugin (later - Vladimir Lapygin) and the Sverdlovsk NPO Automation, headed by Nikolai Semikhatov.


The “Courier” MBR from 1981 was also developed at the Moscow Institute of Heating Engineering under the leadership of Alexander Nadiradze. The USSR Armed Forces were to hand over a small-sized solid-fuel mobile missile, the dimensions of which allowed it to be placed in a conventional refrigerator-container. Thousands of such containers moved across the immense expanses of the Soviet Union. And try to determine in which of them the frozen meat is transported, and in which - the formidable "product" with a considerable-sized monoblock nuclear warhead.

The impossibility of detection is what should have become the main trump card of the Courier. In addition, the missile creators were able to solve an almost impossible task - to provide an intercontinental range and a very fast launch (the latter is extremely important, given the advanced missile defense system available to the enemy) with a starting mass of just 15 tons.

The Courier sketch project was completed in 1984 year. As follows from the above competitive bid, the designers' idea was succeeded to be embodied in the metal. But the ICBM was not expecting the same fate as the MIT employees. As Mikhail Petrov writes in his book “Rocket weapon The Strategic Missile Forces "," flight tests ("Courier") were supposed to start in 1992, but they were canceled due to political and economic reasons. "

Opinion of a competent person

And now the word for “Courier” will be put in silence by Colonel A., who served for a long time in the General Staff of the Strategic Missile Forces.

“The Courier strategic missile system was to be the further development of the unique direction of the Soviet missile industry, embodied in mobile ground-based missile complexes (PGRK), the officer recalled. “Its creation was carried out using the latest materials and technologies of its time, many of which were lost in the period of“ unrest ”.”

Why did you need such a complex? Couldn't it be an alternative to mobile and mining RK Topol-M, as well as Yars? No, the colonel believes.

"With all the faith in the invulnerability of these complexes of their creator - respected, in spite of everything, Yuri Solomonov - it is obvious that by the end of the 80-s of the last century, the potential adversary (now it is more politically correct to talk about" partner ") using reconnaissance equipment to reveal the location of Topolov mobile launchers in field combat starting positions and determine their coordinates with high accuracy. And on this he needed no more than a day. In order to provide the necessary secrecy, our rocket engineers were forced to change field positions with a high frequency, which was extremely difficult for people and destructive for equipment - the service life of the launcher engines was quite limited. ”

“It was impossible to hide heavy and large-sized self-propelled launchers weighing more than 100 tons from US space and optical radar reconnaissance equipment,” states the expert. - In addition, not all bridges and roads in Russia (alas, Russia is not Belarus, where the road infrastructure for the Pioneer missile systems, and then for Topol was created in advance) maintained these “mastodons”, which limited the maneuverability of the PGRK in positional areas ". “As a result, the most important advantage of mobility was lost - uncertainty for a potential enemy of the location of self-propelled launchers,” he believes. - Even then, 20 years ago it became clear (unfortunately, not for everyone) that this direction of maintaining strategic stability with the West comes to a standstill. Then it was decided to develop a small-sized mobile-based missile system, called the "Courier".

“The basis of the new missile system was to become an ICBM weighing no more than 15 tons, having a single-block head of sufficiently large power. The main and most important advantage of it was to be small dimensions and weight, the expert of the military-industrial complex said. - It would allow to mask combat vehicles under ordinary road trains and to move freely on public roads. This property turned the rocket complex from ground to highway - there was no need to hide in the woods and move around at night. ”

“The appearance of the Courier in the combat squadron of the Strategic Missile Forces would lead to a revolution in the combat use of this earlier type, now a kind of Armed Forces and would significantly strengthen the security of Russia,” the expert said. He noted that Army General-General Yuri Maksimov, the then-Commander-in-Chief of the Strategic Missile Forces, later recalled that serious attention was given to completing the development of the Courier missile system with a small-sized missile: it was planned that the combat troops of the Strategic Missile Forces together with the Topols would have more than 700 pieces .

“In 1991, the rocket was ready for testing,” recalled Colonel A. “However, due to well-known events, the work was suspended and then closed”. And in vain. And let our expert cite the opinion of one of the high-ranking generals of the Strategic Missile Forces, who several years ago stated that "it is impossible to resume work on the Courier" because of the loss of a number of technologies to create special materials, components and assemblies, a missile of this type is necessary for the Strategic Missile Forces and whole like air. Why?

In any case, when mobile Topol-M and Yarsy are on duty in field combat starting positions, they are increasingly visible for spacecraft equipped with synthetic aperture radars. The latter are able to recognize changes in the terrain up to five centimeters in height, and no matter how hard it is to launch, its height in the posted position is approximately six meters. Such a change in the height of the relief is not concealed by any means of camouflage. The question is only in the frequency of the flyby of a specific terrain with SAR satellites, which so far depends on the number of spacecraft of this type in orbit.

Only two types of missile systems from among those that the “invincible and legendary” had or that it was preparing to receive could escape from these satellites. This is all the same "Courier" and combat railway missile system (BZHRK), which looks like a regular passenger train. But he is no longer in the ranks. Therefore, many experts believe that in the conditions of rapid improvement of space reconnaissance facilities from foreign "partners", the Russian Strategic Missile Forces should receive something like "Courier" and (or) BZhRK with the obligatory presence of a new heavy liquid-propellant in their combat personnel.

In the meantime ...

Grimace of fate. In the period from 19 December 2006 to 22 in July 2008, according to the contract concluded by the German company OHB System AG with Rosoboronexport and Omsk Polet, the Russian Space Forces launched five German satellites using Kosmos-3М launch vehicles into near-earth space like SAR-Lupe in the interests of the Bundeswehr, who thus acquired its first space reconnaissance system.

These 720 kilograms weighing kilograms are each equipped with equipment that allows you to obtain images of the earth's surface in any light and weather conditions with a resolution of less than one meter. Satellites can recognize moving cars, airplanes, as well as identify other objects, such as firing positions and military equipment. The satellites are located in orbits about 500 kilometers in three different planes and fly around the Earth in 90 minutes. The maximum system response time to a request is 11 hours.

And now, ideally, after the passage of each such satellite, Topol and Yars, when in the field, it is necessary to change positions, which is hardly realistic. But there are still American and French space spies ...
Author:
Originator:
http://vpk-news.ru
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

13 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. ZEBRASH
    ZEBRASH 1 October 2011 13: 16 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    I agree with the author and Colonel A. - “Poplars” and “Yars” are not so inconspicuous recourse
    1. Vadivak 7 October 2011 22: 44 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      We have no irreplaceable .......

      Roscosmos will temporarily stop the development of a new Rus-M launch vehicle, which was supposed to launch for the first time at the Vostochny spaceport in 2015. "We believe that we do not need a new rocket. Despite recent successes, Soyuz and Proton launch vehicles are the most reliable," said the head of the Russian Space Agency, Vladimir Popovkin, during the "government hour" in the State Duma.
    2. Valboro
      Valboro 27 December 2011 11: 19 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Done agree with you and the authors. Both Topol, and Couriers, and in general all mobile systems are recognized with a probability close to 1 complex intelligence. BZHRK so phonite in the infrared range that only the blind can not see it (had to look at our pictures back in the 80s).
      As for the retaliatory strike, its ideology in itself is highly controversial. The Americans solve it with SSBNs, and we all drag it to the main territory.
      As for the Courier in autotrailers, one launcher will not go, but a caravan will be wound, and on roads where such caravans usually do not go.
      No need for US specialists to be considered fools. After a month of observation, they, even by secondary signs, will clear out all the installations.
    3. dvina
      dvina 16 January 2012 16: 40 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      The visibility of the PGRK is offset by the rate of fire. Here, no radar will help.
      In addition .. operating with open sources and considering that SAR is primarily a radar, then the means of ascension are appropriate.
      Radar absorbing fabrics are available here.
      http://www.rusnanonet.ru/articles/46741
      Except for the deaf-blind, rubber products that do not exactly simulate PU are known.
      In addition, there are not so many SAR radars and they have features that limit their capabilities.
      Well, who said that in case of a tense situation, the PGRK will remain in its position areas? What will prevent them from making a march of throwing 200-500 km to the side?
  2. kagorta 1 October 2011 15: 45 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    We didn’t have the guts when the Pindos broke the agreement on, remember about the BZHRK and return them. And on the tracks of our "vigorous" road trains, it’s even scary. Yes, and the protection of what will ride on armored grooves?
    1. JackTheRipper 28 February 2012 04: 22 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Someone found bugs in the 90s found on one of these trains ... (Apparently, those who installed could monitor the movement of this train)
  3. MaxArt
    MaxArt 1 October 2011 20: 51 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    kagorta, such nuclear trains do not have to be constantly driven along the highway. Enough of their presence - this time. And it is enough to drive them onto the road at a time of tension like the Caribbean crisis, so that this crisis is immediately resolved safely.

    Another question remains a mystery - how much can a light 15-ton missile overcome missile defense? Otherwise, everything is irrelevant.
  4. Col. 4 October 2011 14: 29 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    The Americans were mortally afraid of the "Scalpels", unique rail-based missile systems, and therefore "asked" Putin (when he was President of the Russian Federation) to eliminate them. These actions of the GDP, together with the decision to close the center of the Republic of Poland and RTR in Cuba, the flooding of the Mir station with unique weapons (yes, yes!) And equipment on board, formed the basis of the list of crimes compiled by V. Ilyukhin. What happened to Ilyukhin is known to everyone (and there was still Rokhlin). What will we defend ourselves if top management continues this policy?
  5. DEfindER 20 October 2011 12: 17 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    Yes, having such mastodons as the main weapon of deterrence is no longer feasible; they, like dinosaurs, will no longer be able to provide 100% response and survival in war conditions. and are easily detected and destroyed by sabotage groups .. Everything in the world is on the way to reducing size and mass, and the USSR did not accidentally develop the Courier as a necessary deterrent .. and the actions of our government to destroy such systems and also the Scalpels are just a crime against the people!
    1. Lech e-mine
      Lech e-mine 12 December 2011 08: 22 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      It is necessary to revive combat-ready systems as opposed to the US missile defense system. Otherwise, we will ultimately face the fate of LIVIA and Gaddafi.
      Of course, one should not forget the economic side of the matter, and you can tear yourself up.
  6. Denis 17 December 2011 07: 40 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Grimace of fate. In the period from 19 December 2006 to 22 in July 2008, according to the contract concluded by the German company OHB System AG with Rosoboronexport and Omsk Polet, the Russian Space Forces launched five German satellites using Kosmos-3М launch vehicles into near-earth space like SAR-Lupe in the interests of the Bundeswehr, who thus acquired its first space reconnaissance system.

    and in preparation for the launch of the block of the system "times and 3,14zdets" our specialists could not attach?
  7. serg792002
    serg792002 18 February 2012 17: 47 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    It is necessary to withdraw from the INF Treaty and revive production, if it is not too late.
  8. DmitryK 13 February 2013 12: 14 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    It turns out that these missiles remained aloof from the INF Treaty, since only now they have been dismantled?