Iran, Russia and China agree on their own missile defense

Iran, Russia and China agree on their own missile defenseIran, Russia and China are negotiating the creation of a joint missile defense system as opposed to the US-NATO anti-missile shield, the Iranian newspaper Tehran Times claims, citing "unofficial sources."


"Three countries have come to the conclusion that, contrary to the claims of Americans about the necessity of repelling missile and nuclear threats allegedly coming from Iran and North Korea, the missile defense system being created by the United States and NATO is aimed against China and Russia," the newspaper writes.

This, the newspaper notes, is confirmed by the agreements on the deployment of the radar as part of the US missile defense system in Turkey, as well as the American plans to deploy its other components in South Korea and Taiwan.

Experts emphasize, the Tehran Times writes, that China, which has not yet taken any steps in the missile defense field, is beginning to realize the level of threat posed by the US missile defense system.

The newspaper, citing sources, claims that Russia’s permanent representative to NATO, Dmitry Rogozin, plans to discuss the creation of a joint missile defense system during the upcoming visit to Tehran. “Military experts believe that as soon as Iran, Russia and China come to an agreement on the configuration of the future missile defense system, its creation will not be difficult for these three countries,” emphasizes the Tehran Times.

As "Actual Comments" wrote, recently NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen welcomed the entry into force of the agreement between Poland and the United States on the basing of missile defense.

Meanwhile, Russia is concerned about the planned deployment of NATO missile defense in Europe, Russian Defense Minister Anatoly Serdyukov told reporters earlier. However, earlier, NATO Deputy Secretary General Dirk Brengelmann said at a press conference in Moscow that NATO was ready to give Russia guarantees that the missile defense system would not be directed against it. “We can give political assurances that missile defense is not directed against Russia. It will be political language. Then they are written on paper, ”he said.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

13 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Vadivak 29 September 2011 08: 47 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    China, which has not yet taken any steps in the missile defense sphere, is beginning to realize the level of threat posed by the US missile defense system.


    Somehow frivolous sounds do not find?
    Here is an excerpt
    http://nauka21vek.ru/archives/2908

    China began to actively promote the analogue of the Russian anti-aircraft missile system S-300, which received the name HQ-9 or FD-2000 in the export version, to the world market. According to UPI Asia, lately the advertising brochures of these weapons have appeared at two major defense exhibitions - the African Ground Force Equipment Exhibition in South African Cape Town and the Defense Exhibition in Pakistani Karachi.

    According to the agency, their exporter is China Precision Machinery Import-Export Corporation, and for the first time information about the HQ-9 complex in export design with the name FD-2000 appeared back in 1998. The HQ-9 air defense systems are already in service with the Chinese army, but the facts of export deliveries of these systems have not yet been noted. According to some reports, in 2008 Beijing already offered these products to Turkey, which announced a tender for the purchase of air defense systems.

    And here is what
    “Three countries have come to the conclusion that, contrary to the claims of the Americans about the need to repel the missile and nuclear threats allegedly emanating from Iran and North Korea, the US and NATO missile defense system is actually aimed at China and Russia,” it’s 100%, of course
    1. Foamas 30 September 2011 00: 21 New
      • -1
      • 0
      -1
      How can this Chinese junk fight against ballistic targets on the final section of the trajectory ?? If a missile defense system is to be built on the basis of such complexes, they must somehow be imperceptibly deployed in the launch zone of the BR, and if the enemy is the United States, then generally within their territory no further than 100 km. from launchers -., like the whole article of Iranian magazines.
  2. Superduck
    Superduck 29 September 2011 09: 41 New
    • -3
    • 0
    -3
    Crap, another fanitasia from the same series as the BRIC military bloc, these are signs of a serious illness when wishful thinking is given out. The Russian Federation didn’t even sell c300 to Iranians under pressure from the United States, what the fuck about missile defense.
    1. raf
      raf 30 September 2011 14: 29 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Why have SuperDuk instructed cons? After all, he is right! Joint missile defense with Iran is the purest fantasy of the Iranian newspaper!
  3. Banshee 29 September 2011 09: 55 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Well, such a missile defense ... Against Iran, to which C-300 was not sold ...

    I draw your attention to the following:

    “Three countries have come to the conclusion that, contrary to American assertions about the need to repel missile and nuclear threats, allegedly emanating from Iran and North Korea

    "Military experts believe that as soon as Iran, Russia and China will come to an agreement on the configuration of the future missile defense system, its creation is not difficult for these three countries "

    Either somewhere, instead of Iran, India should be, or I don't know how to understand this ...

    In general, the idea is not bad. How are brickets worse than NATO? We also need Iran and S. Korea to be afraid.
    1. Superduck
      Superduck 29 September 2011 10: 13 New
      • -5
      • 0
      -5
      Quote: Banshee
      In general, the idea is not bad. Why are briquettes worse than NATO? We must also be afraid of Iran and S. Korea
      The fact that the BRIC countries are financially, ideologically and politically not ready to confront NATO. So far, nothing in general is united by anything except abbreviations. And it also hinders fantasizing. As I remember myself in 15 years and a photo of Pamela ...
  4. zczczc
    zczczc 29 September 2011 15: 53 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    It would be a very competent act. For us - doubly:

    Firstly, it’s protection from the USA,
    secondly, common interests with China for us are delaying its attack on Siberia.
    1. Marat
      Marat 29 September 2011 23: 05 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      1. I agree - it is high time to confront the world aggressor in a bloc with China and Iran

      2. But unfortunately, so far Russia is not the USSR — it is too early to talk about this. Super Duck is right here - for now it's a fantasy (unfortunately)

      3. Another reason why this is not feasible is that the Communist Party has not yet been in power in Russia.

      I think that Russia will be able to get “off its knees” and openly protect its interests if 2 things happen
      1. People’s government will come to power - or at least the positions of the Communists will be strengthened
      2. If the ongoing integration of the 3 republics ends successfully, then a new Union of 170 million (even without Ukraine in the first stage) could more confidently defend its position
  5. APASUS 29 September 2011 18: 52 New
    • -1
    • 0
    -1
    If this is true then this is a bomb!
    The Western democratic press will erupt in a couple of angry articles! Diplomats, businessmen and politicians will now stretch in orderly lines to the high committees of Russia from the USA! there will be a lot of noise !!!
  6. UAZ Patriot 29 September 2011 21: 44 New
    • -3
    • 0
    -3
    I want the US and China to attack us. the sooner we will end this felony and finally restore our historical borders!
    1. zczczc
      zczczc 30 September 2011 00: 44 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Oh well...
      people do not mind you, it seems? Forgot what war is?
  7. slan
    slan 29 September 2011 21: 58 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Collective farm missile defense))
    To create missile defense together with Iran and China, you need to first occupy Iran and China, just as the United States occupies Europe. When there will be Russian military bases in China, or vice versa, then of course there will be a joint missile defense and a military bloc, and what will not happen ..
  8. Pole 29 September 2011 23: 48 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    China is closer to C-300, much closer than the possibility of our joint missile defense with Tehran!
    The laugh is just ...
    Article - bullshit !!!