George Soros and his position in the context of the Ukrainian crisis

10
I like to read news financial world. As a rule, very important messages are hidden in them covertly. Without any conspiracy, our world is ruled by transnational corporations, in turn fueled by large banking players. It only pretends that economics and politics operate independently of each other. In fact, in the West and in the areas under its control, the first is inextricably dependent on the second. In the economic world, politicians rule the ball: presidents, senators, party leaders, etc. And the other day a very interesting interview was taken from the financial tycoons of George Soros. However, first things first.



Do you all know Mr. Soros? For those who are not familiar with its rich life history, I will explain: this is a man who, as a representative of the Atlantic elites, worked for the collapse of the socialist bloc, having conducted “philanthropic” activities since the eighties. After becoming rich in skillful frauds with money and investing in various stocks, he developed a wide network of public funds whose powers extended far beyond the declared framework. In 1984, the first Soros Foundation in the form of a non-profit organization was organized in its historic homeland, in Hungary, and already in 1987, thanks to the acquiescence of the Soviet authorities, it also appeared in our country.

Over the entire period of its activities, 6 billions of dollars have been spent on the needs of Soros foundations in Eastern Europe. Basically, of course, it was actually the money of the states themselves where these funds worked: as you know, capital was actively exported from the USSR and allied socialist countries in the nineties, some of which were then sent back. It was declared as “generous donations of the American people to young democracies.”

Russia was the main focus of the work of Soros. Since 1991, he has launched a full-fledged propaganda of democratic values. This American capitalist of Jewish descent was one of those who determined our policies in those terrible years of perestroika and the decade of “publicity” that followed. Fortunately, in 2003, the revival of Russian sovereignty forced Mr. Soros to get out of the Russian Federation, and since then he has remained an ardent and constant critic of the Russian authorities.

Well, back to our news. Let me quote her:

“American billionaire George Soros believes that the European Union ignores the financial state of Ukraine. He stated this in an interview with the BBC.

According to the businessman, the EU should provide additional funding to Kiev, but the EU is too busy solving the financial problems of Greece.

This is not the first time the entrepreneur calls on the EU to help Ukraine financially. In late January, Soros published an article in which he called on Europe to help create a prosperous Ukraine, and later on to create a new Russia, immediately transferring $ 15 billion to Kiev. Earlier in January, the businessman also offered the European Union financial assistance to Ukraine, but it was three times a larger amount of $ 50 billion. "

Do you understand what this means? It would seem that ordinary news from the world of economics: a well-known businessman informs everyone about his position regarding the assistance of the European Union to Ukraine. But not everything is so simple.

George Soros is a person who has sponsored several orange revolutions in the CIS countries, including the events in Georgia 2003 of the year, which led to the “Orangeman” and pro-Americanist Saakashvili. He took part in the Ukrainian events. After all, as you know, the Soros Foundation, which recently robbed our country with the tacit connivance of the authorities, always flies to the hot, strives to snatch its piece of cake and simultaneously light up the news spectrum, to enable wide circles to make the most flattering opinion about themselves.

What am I getting at? In January of this year, Soros came ... to Kiev. Here is a coincidence! He waited for the transition period, waited for the election of the oligarch Poroshenko as president and the relative stabilization in the country, and only then suddenly arrived. He arrived without any pomp and fraternization with the friendly Ukrainian people on camera. No, the visit of a financier of this level became known only directly at this moment.

Information about this arrival was extremely scarce. In particular, the channel "112 Ukraine" told that Soros expects to meet with the Ukrainian deputies. Nothing was published on the site; only Anna Gopko, who heads the parliamentary committee on foreign affairs, said that Kiev would visit a well-known financier, who "always has original thoughts about the role and mission of Ukraine in the world."

Of course, the whole truth, we will never know, but here, as it seems not only to me, everything is obvious. The collapse of Ukraine went into the cold stage, but it is definitely designed for the near future. The national currency is rapidly devalued, the country is being drawn into maximum credit dependence on the IMF and other subjects, and this is despite the fact that it is fed on the promises of the West.

The arrival of Soros was caused by his desire to participate in the section of the once rich state and once again earn money on the misfortune of an entire people. Repeatedly, the information that this person earns due to insider information from “knowledgeable” and “competent” persons has slipped. It is not difficult to guess who these people are: bankers, politicians and all those who rule by American politics. I have no doubt that the Ukrainian authorities sold Soros a lot of shares or any other material values ​​on the cheap. And this is logical: for people who already know that they can’t hold out for a long time at the feeder, the main issue is accumulation of money and, immediately after popular unrest, a "sudden" departure to some places very far from today's Ukraine where no one gets to them. Therefore, Soros could easily share several tips and recommendations on which he himself built his career. One thing is clear: the destructive activities of this gentleman have not yet benefited any sovereign state and will not help Ukraine.

I was a little distracted. The “message” of Soros is very timely, it is very clear: Ukraine needs to be supported, supported just a little, in order to give it some more time needed for American bosses. At the same time, the United States does not want to pay for such pleasure, which is also understandable and logical: there is enough of its own problems, the state debt is growing, and you need to somehow get out of it. Even the Fed cannot print these miserable billions. By and large, the American financial system is at a standstill and is now ready to part with its papers only in emergency cases.

The European Union is a rather unreliable geopolitical ally: it seems to be dancing to the tune of the United States and at the same time allowing itself too much liberty. For example, in the negotiations on the so-called. The “Norman format”, apart from Ukraine and Russia, was attended only by EU leaders - Germany and France. And almost immediately, agreements were reached that could never have been worked out if there were American diplomats among the negotiators.

Russia can give European countries many times more independence and the right to determine their fate than America. Be that as it may, even now it is very beneficial for Europe to balance between the two centers of power. And the words of Soros, in fact, addressed directly to Merkel and Hollande, should determine to what degree of "fidelity" in relation to the transatlantic masters the old Europe woman will manifest. This is trivially the most profitable way out of the problem for the White House: the Europeans pay, the Americans get the benefit, as it has already turned out many times.

Fortunately, the European Union is not led by fools. Or, let's say, fools who have accumulated rich life experience and use it to achieve their local goals. I do not think that they will agree to allocate to Ukraine more than a strictly defined amount, which certainly is not enough to resolve all economic problems. And this is only on hand to us and Novorossia: if Ukraine is not supported materially, then very soon it can sink into oblivion, and then the real Russian Revival will unfold on its eastern lands.

But do not forget that the cornered wolf begins to bite. Ukraine will still bring many problems to the Russian world, for the prevention of which it is necessary to remain vigilant and conduct a reasonable foreign policy, which is currently on the shoulders of our diplomats. We wish them good luck - such a huge layer of work aimed at achieving a variety of goals can only be accomplished by professionals and experts in their field.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

10 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    30 March 2015 06: 11
    Ukraine is Germany of the thirties, and people like sores, in addition to their mercantile interests, do not see the world before them - war as a means of profit - that’s their whole world ....
    1. Nesvet Nezar
      +2
      30 March 2015 09: 11
      Ukraine is a part of Russia. and Germany claims the title of teluroocracy. you do not compare the gluteal muscles with a finger.
    2. +2
      30 March 2015 18: 06
      In January of this year, Soros came ... to Kiev.

      He hardly took the time to arrive, he flew for sure.
      And where at that time did the aerodrome technical service cars go?
    3. +2
      31 March 2015 00: 07
      Quote: mig31
      such as sores, in addition to their mercantile interests, they do not see the world before them - war as a means of profit - that’s their whole world

      Soros is the same Brzezinski, only not in politics, but in finance. Only if a person (?) Hates Russia as much as these two do, then whatever you do - politics, finances, at least play the pipe - you won’t hide your hoofs in expensive shoes and you’ll still fall out of your pants. And you won’t fill the smell of sulfur with perfume.
  2. +3
    30 March 2015 06: 42
    Or, let’s say, fools who have gained rich life experience and use it to achieve their local goals.


    Yes, this is a more accurate definition of the EU leadership. Regarding the material and financial support of Ukraine, we can say that the west is not rubber either. Sooner or later, but he will understand that no matter how much money is given to Ukraine, there will be no sense.
  3. +4
    30 March 2015 07: 44
    The United States has always loved and loves to interfere in the life of other states, in my opinion it is time for enterprising people to start interfering in the affairs of this "democratic" state. Surely there are a large number of dissatisfied with varying degrees of aggressiveness inside the country, it is time to connect schemes and mechanisms to lubricate these gears for their more confident work as a counterbalance to the current state policy.
    1. mentalowl
      0
      30 March 2015 22: 17
      Exactly. It's time to change the polarity. What is the difference to "enterprising Soros" on whose trouble loot cut?
  4. +3
    30 March 2015 09: 05
    Such "people" as Soros must be destroyed without trial!
  5. 3vs
    +5
    30 March 2015 10: 03
    These old s ... like Soros, Brzezinski, Rothschilds, Rockefellers want to drag the whole rest of the world behind them like a pilot of a crashed airbus.
    Our task is to help them leave without us.
  6. +2
    30 March 2015 10: 50
    “Russia was the main direction of Soros’s work. Since 1991, he has launched a full-fledged propaganda of democratic values ​​here.” I confirm. Even in our deep province, teachers received grants from this gentleman and were proud of it.
  7. 0
    30 March 2015 11: 12
    in any Slavic language from the countries of the former social bloc, you can find a video about Soros's intervention in the affairs of the country
  8. +2
    30 March 2015 12: 17
    When I hear about the mention of this figure, I wonder, but what do the ice axes no longer do?
  9. Sendi7s
    0
    30 March 2015 13: 45
    He is already ready to invest personal money - he wants to break off a tidbit of Ukraine so much that he is ready to take a risk with a billion personal.

    "Washington, March 30. American financier, head of Open Society Foundations, George Soros, is ready to invest $ 1 billion in the Ukrainian economy," RBC reports with reference to Der Standart.

    “There are specific investment ideas, for example, in agriculture or infrastructure projects,” Soros said. - I would invest a billion dollars. It should be profitable. ”

    At the same time, the financier emphasized that private investment in the Ukrainian economy needs political support from America and the EU.

    Washington and Brussels, according to George Soros, will have to ensure that they will do everything possible to implement the Minsk agreements and non-proliferation of the military conflict. "(C)
  10. 0
    30 March 2015 20: 26
    "War is a concentrated expression of politics, and politics is a concentrated expression of economics"
  11. 0
    30 March 2015 23: 23
    Once the Vulture has arrived, to know, "business" at the Ruins, absolutely seams.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"