The US congressman said that if the US authorities declare the illegitimacy of the Crimean referendum on 2014, then Russia could hold it again.

116
American Congressman Dana Rohrabacher, speaking at the Russian-American socio-political forum in the United States, said that he knows how to remove the political tension that has arisen between Moscow and Washington over Crimea. According to Rohrabacher, if the White House constantly declares that the referendum in Crimea was not legitimate, then Russia could well hold a second plebiscite - under the supervision of the OSCE, which would prove that the opinion of the Crimeans has not changed in any way. This is reported by the edition Los Angeles Times.

The US congressman said that if the US authorities declare the illegitimacy of the Crimean referendum on 2014, then Russia could hold it again.


It should be noted that Congressman Rohrabacher is distinguished by a rather loyal position in relation to Russia, which causes widespread criticism among his colleagues in the US Congress. Last March, Dana Rohrabacher was one of the few American politicians who said that the reunification of Crimea with Russia took place in full compliance with international norms.

Ukraine has already commented on Rohrabacher's statement. In Kiev, they said that holding referendums on the territory of Crimea is pointless, since "Crimea was, is and will be Ukrainian."

In this case, Russia also has its own answer: holding a second referendum in Crimea is really pointless, since the Crimeans have already expressed their position, and Crimea is an integral part of Russia!
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    116 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +67
      27 March 2015 14: 34
      The decision was made by the people of Crimea and Sevastopol a year ago. They went with their advice and repeated referendums in the ass! Let them spend in Texas!
      1. +22
        27 March 2015 14: 35
        More attentively to the texts, admins. Especially to the names laughing
        What's the point of repeating the referendum?
        USA, what will pay for the holding?
        Or did we come up with a new feature so that during the referendum the blanket would slide in the direction they needed?
        1. +15
          27 March 2015 14: 47
          Quote: bort4145
          USA, what will pay for the holding?
          McCain will pay from the Vietnam veterans' mutual aid fund. And Pan Brzezinski agreed to donate the royalties from the last book. Here is where they have this Crimea wassat!!!
          1. 0
            27 March 2015 22: 23
            A good ending for the American presidency Crimea with Russia and a precedent for the subsequent government.
            1. +1
              28 March 2015 16: 03
              Are we sorry or what? Let America pay for the organization of the referendum, it will still be well over 90%, no one is risking anything, but at least they can shut up?
              1. sergi-i
                +3
                29 March 2015 07: 56
                Yeah, America will pay. Will run up and pay again.
                They gave Ukraine some money for the Maidan, so there was at least some hope of victory.
        2. +2
          27 March 2015 15: 21
          Quote: bort4145
          What's the point of repeating the referendum?
          USA, what will pay for the holding?
          Or did we come up with a new feature so that during the referendum the blanket would slide in the direction they needed?

          Apparently, the United States wants to hold a referendum like in Yushchenko's elections (you can't say otherwise) until they like the result. Only here will the Crimeans vote 100 times for joining Russia.
          1. +1
            27 March 2015 17: 57
            Quote: ImperialKolorad
            Apparently, the United States wants to hold a referendum like in Yushchenko's elections (you can't say otherwise) until they like the result. Only here will the Crimeans vote 100 times for joining Russia.

            Russia is not Ukraine. svidomye svidomye soglazalis to extend 3 and subsequent rounds of voting until a candidate who satisfies the US and the EU wins. or they hope to ravage the Crimea, tk. while you vote - don't you work? am
          2. +1
            27 March 2015 18: 09
            Quote: ImperialKolorad
            Apparently, the United States wants to hold a referendum like in Yushchenko's elections (you can't say otherwise) until they like the result. Only here will the Crimeans vote 100 times for joining Russia.

            Recognition or non-recognition of Crimea as a Russian affair for the Americans, why should people bother?
            Say at least a hundred times, halva in your mouth will not become sweeter!
          3. +1
            27 March 2015 19: 00
            Quote: ImperialKolorad
            Apparently, the United States wants to hold a referendum like in Yushchenko's elections (you can't say otherwise) until they like the result. Only here will the Crimeans vote 100 times for joining Russia.

            Then they will say that since Crimea is a Ukrop territory and in order to recognize the results of the referendum, the CEC must be from Kiev and count the ballots in Kiev
        3. +6
          27 March 2015 20: 17
          but I don’t recognize the US presidential elections as legitimate, let them hold re-elections.
      2. +10
        27 March 2015 14: 39
        What ...?! Kindergarten or what ?!
        For the amusement of the Americans ... they dropped everything and started a referendum on a new one ...?! At such moments I remember Zadornov !!!
        1. +16
          27 March 2015 14: 46
          I don’t believe that Obama was legitimately elected. I propose to hold the elections again. I think now this policy will not pick up 10%, which will only confirm my doubts.
          1. -67
            27 March 2015 15: 08
            correctly! and Putin, too, would not hurt .. I do not believe it. I think now he will not gain 30%
            1. +16
              27 March 2015 15: 24
              Quote: Freeway_ 3007
              correctly! and Putin, too, would not hurt .. I do not believe it. I think now he will not gain 30%

              Of course damn it. Do you think that 90% will be for Nemtsov? Heh heh.
            2. +9
              27 March 2015 16: 10
              Quote: Freeway_ 3007
              correctly! and Putin, too, would not hurt .. I do not believe it. I think now he will not gain 30%

              On the planet, it may not pick up, but in Ukraine it will definitely take 25%.
            3. +2
              27 March 2015 17: 49
              Citizen! You play the role of an obscene Troll.
            4. -6
              27 March 2015 17: 55
              I think YOUR and ... with all 30 cm will come our restless you.
            5. +4
              27 March 2015 18: 50
              Quote: Freeway_ 3007
              Freeway_3007


              Lost, dear. Your place is on the "censorship", and we will somehow figure it out without Svidomo's advisers. stop
            6. 0
              29 March 2015 14: 37
              I put "mindel". negative
              A certain number of such non-believers gathers each time.
        2. +3
          27 March 2015 16: 17
          Totally agree with you. In general, I am not impressed by their Declaration of Independence. Let the Americans spend it all over again! And that does not convince!
      3. +8
        27 March 2015 14: 40
        Well, we get the result, say 89 percent? will this change something ??? their own rating agencies recently conducted research - they are happy to live more as part of Russia, so there is no need to arrange left-handed, the dog barks, the caravan goes
        1. +1
          27 March 2015 14: 43
          For DULL, you can repeat. (They were already offended by God ...).
          1. +4
            27 March 2015 15: 36
            No, in principle. You can't dance to a mattress tune. stop
      4. +9
        27 March 2015 14: 53
        I am already writing for the umpteenth time to these statements, "Take it and try to take it away", but not one hohlyaty muzzle does not respond to this.
      5. 0
        27 March 2015 14: 53
        Yes, let them do it again. What is it to us? The result will still be identical to the one year old. 90 percent of the population of Crimea will confirm their desire to become part of Russia. Only this time they will cover their mittens once and for all ...
        1. +5
          27 March 2015 14: 55
          And who is the United States in general to, because of their sick distrust, produce such financially spending movements. Well then, let the US hold a referendum on the annexation of Texas, since they are so confident in their right to this territory. Clown damn it. laughing
        2. +6
          27 March 2015 18: 01
          this will mean that Russia and the Russian authorities will allow a hostile state to interfere in our purely internal affairs. Today we will say what is wrong here, let's satisfy curiosity, and tomorrow we will be ordered to do this and not otherwise. Steam locomotives must be pressed while they are still kettles. winked
        3. +2
          27 March 2015 22: 35
          Quote: eternalmotor
          Yes, let them do it again. What is it to us? The result will still be identical to the one year old. ..


          Talk nonsense, IMHO. Do you really think that the referendum will be held to find out the true opinion of the Crimeans (which they already know)? THEY will conduct and compose tricky questions, THEY will count and count as a NECESSARY, THEY will protest and not accept the result, if anything happens. THEY are enemies and will not hesitate to achieve results. It's like Hitler would hold a referendum on the ownership of Stalingrad ... Yes
        4. 0
          27 March 2015 22: 35
          Quote: eternalmotor
          Yes, let them do it again. What is it to us? The result will still be identical to the one year old. ..


          Talk nonsense, IMHO. Do you really think that the referendum will be held to find out the true opinion of the Crimeans (which they already know)? THEY will conduct and compose tricky questions, THEY will count and count as a NECESSARY, THEY will protest and not accept the result, if anything happens. THEY are enemies and will not hesitate to achieve results. It's like Hitler would hold a referendum on the ownership of Stalingrad ... Yes
      6. The comment was deleted.
      7. +6
        27 March 2015 14: 56
        Crimeans are not clowns to hold an encore referendum!
      8. +4
        27 March 2015 14: 59
        ... Let them spend in Texas! ...

        ..... Texas would be fun .... wink
      9. +4
        27 March 2015 15: 49
        If Russia agrees to "re-vote", then how will it differ from the ruin in which the presidential elections were held in three rounds? The "godlike" people still don't get the idea that their opinion or approval doesn't really matter.
        1. +2
          27 March 2015 18: 19
          And I would play what Provided that the referendum is not confirmed, Russia returns Crimea to Ukraine, if confirmed, the United States bears all the costs of holding the referendum, recognizes the DPR and LPR and rebuilds everything that they destroyed with the hands of dill, plus gratuitous cash injections into the economy of Novorossia for the same amount. Let's play?
      10. +1
        27 March 2015 18: 43
        Quote: sever.56
        They went with their advice and repeated referendums


        Well, why not hold a repeat referendum in Crimea with simultaneous repeated presidential elections in the United States. In my opinion, the exchange is equivalent. bully
      11. +1
        27 March 2015 19: 11
        right now ... we will dodge and prove something to someone. No need.
      12. +3
        27 March 2015 20: 00
        The idea is essentially correct, and could really relieve tension.
        But here's the deal. Firstly, no one in the West will agree to this))
        Secondly, we have already done everything, everything for ourselves and for ourselves, and to be groveling again with a specialist for the West - while I do not see such a need
        1. +3
          27 March 2015 21: 12
          Quote: Gans1234
          Firstly, no one in the West will agree to such a thing)

          The Kiev organized criminal group has already yelled that against the pier laughing
          It is necessary to pressurize! Offer Kiev to finance a referendum in Crimea on the annexation of Crimea to Ukraine wink I wonder how they will dodge in this situation laughing
      13. 0
        28 March 2015 11: 00
        Quote: sever.56
        Let them spend in Texas!

        Just thought, just wider in ALL STATES!
        On the topic "Do you want to remain part of the hated
        the entire population of the Earth of the United (by force!) States of America ?!
        Or want to be free and proud Michigan, Kentuk, etc. ?
      14. +1
        29 March 2015 13: 46
        Quote: sever.56
        The decision was made by the people of Crimea and Sevastopol a year ago. They went with their advice and repeated referendums in the ass! Let them spend in Texas!

        That's it! Moreover, the transfer of Crimea was illegitimate, due to violation of the laws of the USSR on such procedures, and Sevastopol was not part of the RSFSR, unlike Crimea, it was not transferred at all and could not be transferred from the RSFSR to the Ukrainian SSR, nor with violations the law is not without violations, because continued to be directly subordinate to Moscow, and was a subject of union subordination, not republican.
        Therefore, the reunification of Crimea with Russia is the Act of Elimination of Violations of the USSR Laws, made in 1954. As for Sevastopol, it belonged and belongs to Russia because it is the legal successor of the USSR. De jure, Sevastopol can be considered illegally occupied by Ukraine, which in fact was the case from 1991 until March 2014.
      15. 0
        29 March 2015 21: 16
        And for what ? To prove something to someone? This is superfluous, and they stopped feeding on illusions.
      16. 0
        30 March 2015 10: 16
        Better in Alaska, and suddenly they want to join us laughing
      17. 0
        31 March 2015 14: 49
        Nobody argues, just the congressman suggested as an option, so that his own people stop getting excited ... it is clear that no one will do this, first of all, the United States. It is quite possible that he is one of the few normal in their congress and thinks for people and not for the asses of the "business" who brewed all this ...
    2. +14
      27 March 2015 14: 35
      holding a second referendum in Crimea is really pointless, since the Crimeans have already expressed their position, and Crimea is an integral part of Russia!


      But thanks to the American congressman for his kind attitude towards Russia.
      1. +5
        27 March 2015 14: 39
        Quote: rotmistr60

        But thanks to the American congressman for his kind attitude towards Russia.


        It is a pity that there are few of them, and they do not make the weather in the US Senate and Congress!
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. +10
          27 March 2015 15: 02
          Rohrabaker - suggested that his fool-colleagues check whether there was a "weaning" of Crimea or the population of Crimea does not want to be Ukraine, in a very simple way. This proposal was purely rhetorical, i.e. conduct a survey and see the result for yourself.
          Rohrabaker is confident that the Crimeans will again vote to return to the Russian Federation.
          Rohrabaker himself voted against the supply of arms to Ukraine.
          Rohrabaker stands for the federalization of Ukraine, i.e. for the autonomy of Donetsk and Lugansk.
          ----------------
          Rohrabaker is a sensible politician - compared to the rest of the Congressmen.
          Rohrabaker, Chair of the Subcommittee on European and Eurasian Affairs, is an important post in Congress. He's one of those. who makes the "weather".
          His suggestions are a cold, sobering shower for not quite sober congressional colleagues.
          These proposals are made in the United States Congress and are not by request to the Russian Federation.
          rotmistr60 and sever.56 - You noticed all this correctly.
        3. 0
          27 March 2015 16: 59
          I support. But THEY will not go for it. Ask to do this.
    3. +5
      27 March 2015 14: 35
      We know how the OSCE can count, record and observe.
    4. +5
      27 March 2015 14: 35
      And for what?
      To "please" these striped ones?
      Then let them first observe international norms themselves.
      1. Job
        +1
        27 March 2015 14: 59
        And if you delve into mattress mats in dirty linen? How legitimately do the states own territories? Everything there is far from the norms of international law. And in the 90s they played enough of looking at mattress mats.
    5. +3
      27 March 2015 14: 37
      I wonder if Jen Psaki is a woman? It would be necessary to stir up the referendum. laughing
      1. +1
        27 March 2015 18: 05
        Quote: noncombant
        I wonder if Jen Psaki is a woman? It would be necessary to stir up the referendum. laughing
        her proof will grow in 7 months. and before that a reasonable doubt. just why the referendum - the question we will pose - is Jen Psaki Jim Psak?
    6. +1
      27 March 2015 14: 37
      Ukraine has already commented on Rohrabacher's statement. In Kiev, they said that holding referendums on the territory of Crimea is pointless, since "Crimea was, is and will be Ukrainian."

      -------------------
      Ukrainians do not care about everything, they do not write the law ...
      1. +5
        27 March 2015 14: 40
        Quote: Altona
        Ukraine has already commented on Rohrabacher's statement. In Kiev, they said that holding referendums on the territory of Crimea is pointless, since "Crimea was, is and will be Ukrainian."

        -------------------
        Ukrainians do not care about everything, they do not write the law ...


        Sure, not a problem! Let them hold a referendum in Ukraine on Ukraine's accession to Crimea! Apply! Consider!
        1. 0
          27 March 2015 20: 44
          Yes, they are trying to bribe us again with money - now for a second referendum.
          I do not mind, but only at the expense of Europe, and money in advance !!!
        2. 0
          29 March 2015 09: 02
          It seems that much more interesting would be the result of the referendum "On the desire of certain regions of Ukraine to join Crimea and the Russian Federation"

          PS. The flag of the provider does not correspond to the city of SEVASTOPOL
          I apologize.
    7. +1
      27 March 2015 14: 38
      Do not meddle with us with stupid proposals.
    8. +4
      27 March 2015 14: 38
      What other referendum? Everything is late to rush!
    9. +7
      27 March 2015 14: 38
      YES, the point is not in the referendum and not so much in the Crimea, as in the fact that until recently only the United States could change the borders of states in the world. Now their hegemony in this is violated, and this in turn means that the United States is losing its influence in the world and this really threatens with economic collapse in the states. For the dollar is secured in the world by only one thing - the authority of the United States.
    10. +4
      27 March 2015 14: 38
      American Congressman Dana Rohrabacher, speaking at the Russian-American socio-political forum in the United States, said that he knows how to remove the political tension that has arisen between Moscow and Washington over Crimea. According to Rohrabacher, if the White House constantly declares that the referendum in Crimea was not flyable, then Russia could well hold a repeated plebiscite - under the supervision of the OSCE, which would prove that the opinion of the Crimeans has not changed in any way

      And maybe where else to hold a referendum? For example in Texas.
      Reminds the former British Foreign Minister, who at one time demanded to change the Constitution of the Russian Federation to extradite Russian citizens suspected of murdering Litvinenko.
    11. The comment was deleted.
    12. +3
      27 March 2015 14: 38
      After they hold a referendum in Texas, then maybe we'll think about it.
    13. +4
      27 March 2015 14: 38
      And what, now for every sneeze in the United States to conduct repeated referendums? And if we do not recognize the legitimacy of the federalization of the United States, the United States needs to hold a second "referendum" on the unification of the North and the South?
    14. +5
      27 March 2015 14: 39
      A repeated referendum would show our opponents "weakness" or "compliance" if you like, which is completely unacceptable! The issue of Crimea joining the Russian Federation, in principle, should no longer be subject to any doubt, and the yapping of various Gayrop and m.a.t.r.a.s.n.ykh figures on this fact as a p..dezh into the water - some bubbles!
      1. +1
        27 March 2015 18: 07
        Quote: FIREMAN
        the given fact as a p..dezh in water - some bubbles!
        AND SMELL No.
    15. +3
      27 March 2015 14: 39
      Oh, we don't need to do anything else ?! Well, let's just say, again, on the eve of May 9 ?!
    16. +3
      27 March 2015 14: 41
      I can't stand it enough when you hear ukropskiy Crimea was, is and will be ukropskiy. on what basis? hard horse penis for you, dill, not Crimea. This is our Russian land!
    17. The comment was deleted.
    18. +5
      27 March 2015 14: 42
      Crimea cannot belong to Ukraine, because it does not belong to itself. laughing
    19. +3
      27 March 2015 14: 44
      Maybe we will offer them to hold a referendum in Alaska and California?
    20. Rubmolot
      +2
      27 March 2015 14: 44
      Fart on health, American authorities! hi
    21. +2
      27 March 2015 14: 46
      Or maybe after the US presidential elections we will say that the campaign was unconvincing, non-transparent and we would like to ask the US to hold a repeat election. Well, pure neighing.
    22. 0
      27 March 2015 14: 47
      we have nothing else to do.
    23. +1
      27 March 2015 14: 48
      Maybe you can also dance a polka. The Yankees float a little shallowly in their euro-sewers. The island of Crimea was blown away during a stormy time, but now it is firmly moored to the Russian Coast.
    24. +2
      27 March 2015 14: 50
      It is useless, any result of the referendum that is not pleasing to the US authorities will be rejected by them and no matter who will be as observers ... they will find the reason or suck it out, they are specialists in this.
    25. 0
      27 March 2015 14: 52
      we can hold a referendum on the return of all the primordially Russian lands to Russia! and we do not plan to hold any other referendums.
    26. +1
      27 March 2015 14: 54
      He said this to those who do not recognize the reunification of the Crimea in order for them to lie less.
    27. 0
      27 March 2015 14: 56
      Don't poke your nose, flawed, we don't need advice.
    28. +1
      27 March 2015 14: 56
      Crimea was conquered from the Turks by Russia, not Ukraine, and a lot of Russian blood has been shed there since then. The fact that Crimea was not Russian for twenty years is a simple misunderstanding.
      1. Rusi dolaze
        0
        29 March 2015 21: 13
        Quote: Vladimir Lipov
        Crimea was conquered by Russia from the Turks

        Well, let's say not from the Turks, but from the Crimean Khanate ... :)))
    29. +2
      27 March 2015 14: 57
      Uncle is more likely that he understands everything, trolls his colleagues, I think they don't want to give in to Russia.
    30. 0
      27 March 2015 15: 00
      especially for him, we will hold Crimean referendums on Mondays and Fridays
    31. 0
      27 March 2015 15: 02
      And it is not weak for them in the states of the light elves to hold a referendum on the status of each state.
    32. 0
      27 March 2015 15: 05
      Enough to bend in front of the stupid !!!. If you repeat it, they will start to squeal, they themselves are not sure.
    33. 0
      27 March 2015 15: 09
      I think that the congressman pronounced this in a subjunctive mood, not at all intending to propose to someone to arrange a re-vote, but only trying to prove to his opponents the futility of their stubborn obstinacy.
      Our answer is always the same, even to such statements that do not seem to apply to us - carefully study the results of the last referendum, mistrustful gentlemen.
      Well, the clique (klake, or even - cesspool), which has settled in Kiev, only has to say the same spell over and over again. However, it is clearly not getting sweeter.
    34. msm
      msm
      -4
      27 March 2015 15: 16
      And, why not, if it will transfer the question to a new plane? I am confident in the result! Let politicians, observers, the press come from Geyropa, from the FSA themselves, and from neutral countries - let them watch ... Crimea will work - also a plus. lol
      1. +1
        27 March 2015 16: 18
        Yes, let the whole white house come to do us a blow job in the Crimea! We made our choice! We won't even put them in their mouths, because it is "zapadlo" to get dirty! Crimea - Russia !!!
        1. msm
          msm
          0
          27 March 2015 20: 01
          We must look not only under our breath! They are in Gayrope looking for a way to their retreat.... And, so insinuatingly, we are told: "Spend it, and we will surrender ..."
          CLEAR?!
    35. 0
      27 March 2015 15: 19
      Quote: sever.56
      The decision was made by the people of Crimea and Sevastopol a year ago. They went with their advice and repeated referendums in the ass! Let them spend in Texas!


      "... how to remove the political tension that has arisen between Moscow and Washington over the Crimea"

      In general, the very fact of Yankes' accentuation of "tension" - where is Washington, and where is Crimea? Soon the lunar surface will be in the Yankee zone, got it already! am
    36. +4
      27 March 2015 15: 19
      how funny these are .. if the Russian Federation declares the legitimacy of the election of US congressmen are they ready to hold a repeat election? =)))
    37. +1
      27 March 2015 15: 21
      Yes, at least 10 years in a row to hold a referendum anyway, and you and the Ukrainians will not recognize it
    38. +2
      27 March 2015 15: 21
      And who are the US authorities, and what did they do good for us to hold a second referendum for them? A lot of honor.
    39. +3
      27 March 2015 15: 31
      Why argue? Not only Crimea is Russian, but also Ukraine (all) is also a part of Russia (as the name implies: at the edge). A small part and shitty, but a part of Russia.
    40. Tor5
      +1
      27 March 2015 15: 35
      The only plus of the statement is his benevolence and desire to find a way out.
    41. 0
      27 March 2015 15: 37
      “Crimea was, is and will be Ukrainian” - meaningless talk. What has fallen, it is gone) Have fun ...
    42. 0
      27 March 2015 15: 38
      Quote: monk
      Maybe you can also dance a polka. The Yankees float a little shallowly in their euro-sewers. The island of Crimea was blown away during a stormy time, but now it is firmly moored to the Russian Coast.

      I would, forgive me, add only one thing, gentlemen Americans. When we have to, we'll fuck a polka, and then dance on the ruins of the euro and American civilization. Amerikosy you are waiting for war, you really want it, but are you ready to receive it? Your general said that you have to kill in packs of Russians, and I am Russian, and I tell you the Americans, Russian men will kill you in droves! You T.V.A.R.i. s.a.u.b..e.s.s. dig the earth for the coffins !!!
    43. +1
      27 March 2015 15: 39
      Get away from our Crimea. He was, is and always will be a part of Russia. And whoever does not like it - go through the forest.
    44. +1
      27 March 2015 15: 47
      ... then Russia could hold it again ...
      - I mean, again and again "politely" to remind about the stupidity of the US leadership?
    45. kelevra
      0
      27 March 2015 16: 02
      Well, again no one is going to do anything on our part, because we do not care about the opinion of the Geyropa and the USA!
    46. 0
      27 March 2015 16: 04
      The United States declares the illegitimacy of the Crimean referendum in 2014,



      Mattress toppers can continue to declare what they want, what they say to us on the drum.
    47. 0
      27 March 2015 16: 14
      Repeatedly ??? Did you like how Russia turns you around in one place?!.
    48. -2
      27 March 2015 16: 16
      Looking at some of your comments from the outside, then again from the outside it looks like you are afraid of something. What is the cost of re-holding a referendum? The truth will be told if all Crimeans feel so good in the Russian Federation.
      1. 0
        27 March 2015 20: 31
        Quote: liberty
        Looking at some of your comments from the outside, then again from the outside it looks like you are afraid of something. What is the cost of re-holding a referendum? The truth will be told if all Crimeans feel so good in the Russian Federation.


        Why are the people a toy or something, the people said their word, Russia said its word, why should we and our people prove anything to the amers, they are not authority to prove anything to them
        1. -1
          27 March 2015 23: 50
          Due to the fact that you "do not need to prove anything", the ruble has fallen.
          The point is, you won't lose anything, and the sanctions crap might end.
          1. Rusi dolaze
            0
            29 March 2015 21: 19
            Quote: liberty
            The point is, you won't lose anything, and the sanctions crap might end.

            One more "horse" in the course wormed ...
            Daddy hasn’t planted all of them yet.
            Would you like to visit the "American" in Minsk?
        2. MLF
          MLF
          0
          29 March 2015 19: 50
          Quite right! And money is never superfluous!
    49. +1
      27 March 2015 16: 19
      You don't need to pay attention to their hype ... If you succumb and hold a second referendum, then another third and fourth will be demanded, then a fifth ... and that ad infinitum.
    50. Fat
      0
      27 March 2015 16: 23
      lard of greenery for the development of Crimea with mattress ... and you can spend again
    51. +3
      27 March 2015 16: 24
      Then something like this! request
    52. 0
      27 March 2015 16: 29
      The black ruler orders! lol
    53. +1
      27 March 2015 16: 45
      In the place of Crimea, return the ashes of N.S. Khrushchev to the ruin, it will be fair.
    54. ZORKA76
      +1
      27 March 2015 17: 38
      Only Poroshenko’s sphincter will be Ukrainian, and then with the permission of the State Department.
    55. +2
      27 March 2015 17: 48
      Why listen, or rather, talk about those who, while making claims to others, do not care about the legitimacy of their actions? To advertise for them? Yes, forget about the US doing anything legally at all. She does what she needs to do. Write and mention this narcissistic country so that the USA is associated only with Coca-Cola or Pesi-Cola. Why raise their importance with your cries?
    56. +1
      27 March 2015 18: 20
      Ukraine has already commented on Rohrabacher's statement. In Kiev, they said that holding referendums on the territory of Crimea is pointless, since "Crimea was, is and will be Ukrainian."
      So much for the freedom of expression and rights of the PEOPLE! And we want to achieve something at the UN??? OSCE? PACE?
    57. +1
      27 March 2015 18: 40
      What should Russia not do? Let’s drop everything now and convince Psakistan.
    58. +1
      27 March 2015 18: 50
      Dan Rohrabacher's statement once again emphasizes that the proposal of even a congenial congressman is far from the thoughts and aspirations of Russia.
      One can imagine what other policy hawks are saying...
    59. +1
      27 March 2015 18: 58
      Questions about changing the status of a subject of the Russian Federation cannot be submitted to a referendum (FKZ No. 5 of June 28, 2004), and raising a question of the type “purely whether you want it or not” is the lot of social polls.
      By the way,
      The Autonomous Republic of Crimea is an integral part
      Ukraine and, within the powers determined by the Constitution of Ukraine, resolves issues within its jurisdiction. (Constitution of Ukraine. Section 10, Article 134)
      -and there is no talk about the right of the ARC to secession, and in general about determining its status.
      For this reason, an all-Ukrainian referendum will decide on the status:
      Article 73. The issues of changing the territory of Ukraine are exclusively decided by an all-Ukrainian referendum.

      Those. the annexation of Crimea based on the results of a local referendum resolving issues beyond its competence (since the Ukrainian state at that time was not recognized as incompetent and not sovereign) can be considered as the fact that the Russian Federation recognizes the dominance of International Law in the internal affairs of sovereign states over domestic legislation.
      Yes. It was necessary to annex Crimea, this is indisputable.
      However, the “precedent” may very well “go sideways”. The legislation of the Russian Federation also at the same moment, in the same way, conflicts with the MP.
      laughing What if the Jewish Autonomous Region decides to turn to the Chinese?
    60. +3
      27 March 2015 19: 38
      In any case, the results of the new referendum will not be recognized, since it will no longer be 95%, but 99% for Russia. Ukraine is no longer the same as it was a year ago.
    61. +1
      27 March 2015 20: 04
      Or maybe they will advise us to hold elections again in Russia?
      The greyhounds are there too because of the good life.
    62. +1
      27 March 2015 20: 56
      Crimea and Russia don’t have to prove anything to anyone, otherwise everyone will like it.
      The people have made their choice! RUSSIA IS FOR YOU, WE ARE UNITED FOREVER!!!
    63. +3
      27 March 2015 22: 20
      In Kyiv they said that holding referendums on the territory of Crimea is pointless, since “Crimea was, is and will be Ukrainian.”

      Crimea WAS NOT, IS NOT AND WILL NOT BE Ukrainian.
    64. +2
      27 March 2015 22: 44
      Let them make re-elections five times in their TRASH!
    65. +2
      27 March 2015 23: 19
      I propose holding a referendum in all states under Chinese supervision.
    66. +1
      28 March 2015 01: 55
      Interfering in Russia's internal affairs is harmful to American health.
    67. 0
      28 March 2015 05: 37
      Let him ask his wife for “repeat” if he is still capable. Shoigu correctly told them all that there is no need to get involved in internal Russian affairs!
    68. +1
      28 March 2015 08: 22
      If only they were walking through the forest with their second referendum. Otherwise, we don’t know who our master is at rigging the results of all sorts of “democratic expressions of will.” It seems that last year the TsER officials missed the referendum, they were beaten for a whole year without Vaseline, so now what have they come up with! WILL NOT WORK!
      As a citizen of Russia, I declare that the military actions of European colonists in the New World violated the rights of the indigenous population of the American continent. I demand that the current US government, as the legal successor of these filthy lawless men, be called to international responsibility for genocide!
    69. +1
      28 March 2015 21: 41
      There is a great desire to send the Americans with their “proposals” regarding Crimea to hell. There was a referendum, Crimea was recognized as part of the Russian Federation. Americans, do you have any questions?
      Hold referendums in Texas or California.
    70. +1
      29 March 2015 07: 16
      Freedom for Russia is when everything that the United States declares is purely their own business.
    71. 0
      29 March 2015 11: 55
      a repeat referendum - Russia’s recognition of the illegitimacy of the annexation of Crimea, I think. wink
    72. Fat
      0
      29 March 2015 11: 57
      EVERY TRASH IS TRYING TO TEACH US AND SHOW US WHAT TO DO. IT’S TIME TO START A MEXICAN REVOLUTION IN PINDO.STAN
    73. 0
      29 March 2015 12: 20
      With a pig's snout, and in a Kalash line! Let the pindomatrice point her finger at herself!
    74. +1
      29 March 2015 17: 32
      hold a repeat referendum in Crimea on the annexation of Donbass to the Autonomous Russian Republic of Crimea.
      Wait a little and it will be possible to include the Odessa region in the list of annexed ones.
    75. 0
      29 March 2015 17: 51
      Dana Rohrabacher... It would be interesting to look at his parents when they named their offspring.
    76. MLF
      MLF
      +1
      29 March 2015 19: 48
      It’s strange why no one takes into account the Crimean referendum of 1992?
    77. +1
      29 March 2015 20: 30
      Good evening.
      An interesting initiative. It needs to be extended to the global community.
      With what frequency do citizens of each democratic country elect a supreme power, with the same frequency hold referendums on the location of, for example, each state in the United States, federal states in Germany, counties and districts of England, and further down the list.
      It is necessary, first of all, to involve the “founders of democracy” in the practice of confirming territorial integrity.
    78. Erg
      +1
      29 March 2015 20: 39
      In my opinion, the topic is closed. For those who didn't "stick in" - the train has left soldier
    79. +1
      29 March 2015 22: 20
      The event in Crimea and Sevastopol on May 9 will show once again what Crimeans think about the West and their American friends.
    80. Leonidych
      +1
      30 March 2015 08: 06
      It is necessary to hold a new referendum on a dispute and if the data is repeated, then the Amerdos will return Alaska....
    81. 0
      30 March 2015 09: 54
      Why are they worried about Crimea? It seems that the time has come to return Alaska!
    82. +1
      30 March 2015 09: 54
      Why are they worried about Crimea? It seems that the time has come to return Alaska!
    83. +1
      30 March 2015 10: 08
      Crimeans made their choice a year ago. Everything is fair and legal.
    84. 717
      +1
      30 March 2015 10: 29
      Right . holding a referendum on the status of Crimea is pointless. The referendum had already passed and it was necessary to send observers when invited. Now look at the recordings and sniff into a rag.
    85. Sendi7s
      +1
      30 March 2015 13: 55
      A repeat referendum in Crimea - only after repeat presidential elections in Kyiv! smile

      Seriously though... Now, we've just run away. As the OSCE observes, we are all well convinced that there is no objectivity. Or is it just that, one-sided - in favor of the Kyiv junta. This is the first thing.
      And secondly, the Crimeans said their word once - and they are not going to change it. And the funds that will have to be spent on this referendum would be better invested in the economy of the peninsula.

      I propose a counter option - gather a commission from the State Department, the EU, the OSCE - and all sorts of other organizations - and talk to Crimeans on the streets, ask them questions. Maybe then you’ll stop escalating the situation and believing that Crimea has to prove something to someone a second time.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"