Admiral Essen is preparing for mooring trials

58
At the Yantar shipyard (Kaliningrad), preparations for mooring trials of the second frigate of the 11356 project “Admiral Essen” are being completed, reports MIC With reference to the press secretary of the company Sergey Mikhailov.

Admiral Essen is preparing for mooring trials


“At present, the plant has begun the completion of a set of works that precede the start of mooring tests: just yesterday, the ship launched all the power engineering that gives life to all working components and mechanisms,” said Mikhailov.

The preparation for the tests, according to him, is going according to plan. According to the schedule they should begin in May.

“In general, the construction of Essen is proceeding systematically and without serious problems. This is due to the fact that the frigate is the second hull of the 11356 project. It was launched on November 7 2014 of the year, ”Mikhailov added.

The newspaper reminds that “the lead ship of this series of missile defense Admiral Grigorovich was laid at the 18 plant in December 2010, followed by the Admiral Essen - 8 July 2011, the Admiral Makarov - 29 February 2012, the Admiral Butakov "- July 12 2013 of the year," Admiral Istomin "- November 15 of the year 2013."

"Admiral Grigorovich" is currently completing the running test program.
58 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. kelevra
    +3
    27 March 2015 12: 44
    A little more and he will inspire fear in the Americans!
    1. +8
      27 March 2015 12: 51
      Good generalists
      The patrol ships of the 11356 project are designed to carry out combat operations in the ocean and sea areas independently and as part of a ship connection as an escort ship. The combat capabilities of the ship allow you to search for and destroy enemy submarines; to carry out anti-ship, anti-aircraft and anti-submarine defense of warships and ships at sea; support the combat operations of the ground forces and ensure the landing of amphibious assault forces.

      1. GDP
        +4
        27 March 2015 13: 27
        Great ship! In all respects, a universal combat vehicle ...
        Destroys everything - submarines, cruisers, planes, helicopters, torpedoes, cruise missiles and ground highly protected targets in the depths of the enemy’s defense.

        The armament includes 8 vertical launchers (VPU) of the Onyx or Caliber-NK complex, whose missiles can hit surface, coastal and underwater targets, as well as an automatic universal 100-mm artillery installation.
        The defensive arsenal consists of 36 Shtil-1 air defense missile systems in the VPU, and two Kratik or Broadship SAM systems. Two double-tube 533-mm torpedo tubes and RBU-6000 provide anti-submarine and anti-torpedo protection
        1. +2
          27 March 2015 14: 03
          Quote: GDP
          The defensive arsenal consists of 36 Shtil-1 air defense missile systems in the VPU, and two Kortik or Broad-defense missile systems.

          EMNIP, at 11356 there is no ZRAK. Only ordinary AK-630 blowtorches.
      2. +6
        27 March 2015 13: 36
        Quote: bort4145
        Good generalists


        That is, if the generalists solve so many problems, then there should be as many as possible!

    2. +7
      27 March 2015 12: 59
      We wish a speedy commissioning of this frigate.
      1. +11
        27 March 2015 13: 19
        Quote: Thought Giant
        We wish a speedy commissioning of this frigate.

        Let us recall the name by which the ship was named.
        Nikolai Ottovich von Essen (11 December 1860, St. Petersburg - 7 May 1915, Revel) - Russian Admiral. An ardent patriot of Russia, the hero of defense of Port Arthur, strategist of the successful naval battles of 1 World War in the Baltic Sea. Eternal glory to Nikolai Ottovich!
        1. wef
          0
          27 March 2015 15: 08
          Eternal glory.
          A gift to the Swedes - von Essen, will "nightmare" them.
        2. -7
          27 March 2015 16: 28
          Quote: kr33sania
          Quote: Thought Giant
          We wish a speedy commissioning of this frigate.

          Let us recall the name by which the ship was named.
          Nikolai Ottovich von Essen (11 December 1860, St. Petersburg - 7 May 1915, Revel) - Russian Admiral. An ardent patriot of Russia, the hero of defense of Port Arthur, strategist of the successful naval battles of 1 World War in the Baltic Sea. Eternal glory to Nikolai Ottovich!

          Well, in more detail, than Admiral Essen became famous, what kind of strategy did he invent, what feat did he accomplish?

          And what a bitch giblet is coming up with names for new ships ... not otherwise, some "dvorkovich" warmed up in the General Staff building in the warm place of an ideologist.
          What feats of arms did the Admirals Butakovs, Essenes, and Grigorovich glorify the Russian fleet?
          Probably they were good people and exemplary family men in life, they did not cheat on their wives, but this alone is not enough to name a warship by your name, therefore they gave names to Russian warships following the traditions of the military spirit: Varangian, Undaunted, Grozny, Guardian, Courage, and so forth
          So by some anniversary we will see the "frigate" Yeltsin "or the submarine" Chernomyrdin "
          1. +5
            27 March 2015 19: 57
            Quote: Polar
            Well, in more detail, than Admiral Essen became famous, what kind of strategy did he invent, what feat did he accomplish?

            Refusal of seasonality of training (yes, yes, in the XNUMXth century the BF still followed the traditions of the sail era), a new shipbuilding program, rejection of petty savings in preparation, the introduction of a radio reconnaissance service, and, most importantly, the constant struggle against the main enemy of the fleet - the ministry finance. smile
            Walking five days a month with a 12,5-nodal move is not a study, but a waste of time and coal

            If we take PMV, then for Essen there is a pre-emptive mine laying on the CMAP and the CMAP concept itself. And if you recall the RYAV - KR "Novik" and the EBR "Sevastopol" (the only one from the Port Arthur squadron that the Japanese did not get) ...
            Quote: Polar
            What feats of arms did the Admirals Butakovs, Essenes, and Grigorovich glorify the Russian fleet?

            Admiral Butakov is a hero of the Crimean War. He, commanding the PFR "Vladimir", conducted the first battle of steam ships in history, which ended in the capture of the Turkish PFR "Pervaz-Bahri". Further, Butakov commanded a squadron of the PFR Black Sea Fleet, which supported the coastal flank of our troops with fire. Author of the work "New Foundations of Steamship Tactics".
            Quote: Polar
            therefore, they gave names to Russian warships following the traditions of the military spirit: Varangian, Undaunted, Terrible, Guardian, Courage, etc.

            Learn history. In 1913, the Admiral Butakov cruiser, one of the four Svetlana-class cruise ships, was loaned to the RIF. Not completed, planned for restructuring into a training CD for the USSR Navy.
          2. 0
            28 March 2015 11: 07
            Quote: Polar
            So by some anniversary we will see the "frigate" Yeltsin "or the submarine" Chernomyrdin "

            The world's largest diesel-electric icebreaker Viktor Chernomyrdin has been under construction at the Baltic Shipyard since the 12th year and (superstructure) in Germany laughing
            So, at the expense of the admirals, calm down - Essen is a decent name for a guard.
    3. +6
      27 March 2015 13: 29
      Quote: kelevra
      A little more and he will inspire fear in the Americans!

      If you think logically, then did Donald Cook inspire us all? rave
      1. +7
        27 March 2015 13: 43
        Life of a cheer patriot is easy and pleasant, it’s especially nice that you don’t need to think
    4. 0
      27 March 2015 17: 36
      From the article

      "Admiral Grigorovich" is currently completing the running test program.
      -------

      The question is how does he complete the sea trials program, if he has never gone to sea?
      In absentia, standing at the pier wink well, specialist journalists

      And so a good frigate
      1. 0
        28 March 2015 17: 09
        Here, most likely a typo, mooring tests are being completed.
    5. Reasonable, 2,3
      0
      28 March 2015 04: 00
      Without a group is a trifle, to scare the Finns. We need a different fleet.
  2. +1
    27 March 2015 12: 45
    Navy is waiting for replenishment in the ships.
  3. +3
    27 March 2015 12: 46
    Seven feet under the keel and happy sailing !!!
  4. +3
    27 March 2015 12: 47
    Lyapota what! It's expensive to see !! fellow
    1. 0
      27 March 2015 13: 09
      It’s a little incomprehensible why they chose this color, it looks civilian
      1. +4
        27 March 2015 13: 20
        At the output, such a color will be
  5. Bombardier
    +5
    27 March 2015 12: 48
    The workhorse of the Russian fleet! Oh, there would be more such ships!
  6. +7
    27 March 2015 12: 48
    TTX of the ship:
    Crew - 180 people (including 18 officers)

    Maximum length - 124,8 m
    Width - 15,2 m
    Draft:
    - 4,2 / 4.5 m (with standard displacement)
    - 7.5 m (overall)

    Full displacement - 4035 t
    Standard displacement - 3620/3830 t

    Full speed - 30 knots
    The speed of the economic course - 14 knots
    Navigation range:
    - 4500 miles (18 knots)
    - 4850 miles (14 knots)
    Autonomy - 30 days

    Cost:
    - frigate pr.11356 (1997) was approx. 330 million USD
    - frigate pr.11356 of the second series (2006) amounted to approx. 533 million USD


    Armament:

    Project 11356 First Series for India
    Project 11356 Second Series for India
    (No.01354-01356) "Admiral Grigorovich" / pr.11356M or pr.11356R

    Anti-ship missiles 8 х anti-ship missiles 3M54E / SS-N-27 of the Сlub-N complex developed by OKB "Novator", Yekaterinburg, export version, in the vertical launch unit 3S14E, OMS 3R14N-11356 developed by NPO Agat; target designation from BIUS or from the radar target designation 3Ts25E
    8 x BrahMos anti-ship missiles - in the 3S14E vertical launch unit, 3R14N-11356 vertical launch unit developed by NPO Agat, 3S14 vertical launch unit manufactured by the Baltic plant (PU, Saint Petersburg), 3R14N-11356 SUO developed by the Agat NPO

    - missile complex "Caliber"
    - missile complex "Onyx"
    SAM SAM "Shtil" - 1 launcher 3S90E with ammunition 24 missiles 9M317E, with 4 x radar SUO SAM MR-90 "Nut" / FRONT DOME
    SAM "Shtil" - 1 launcher 3S90E with ammunition 24 missiles 9M317E, with 4 x radar SUO SAM MR-90 "Nut" / FRONT DOME SAM "Shtil-1" - 3 x launchers of vertical launch 3S90E.1 with 3 x ammunition 12 missiles, probably 4 x radar SUO air defense missile system MR-90 "Nut" / FRONT DOME
    Artillery A-190E - 1 x 100 mm artillery mount with the 5P-10E Puma A-190E - 1 x 100 mm artillery mount with the 5P-10E Puma A-190-1 - 1 x 100 mm artillery mount with MSA 5P-10 "Puma"
    ZRAK / AK ZRAK "Kashtan" - 2 combat modules on the stern of the superstructure (with a possible replacement for "Kashtan-M" during operation), 6000 rounds of ammunition, 64 3M311E missiles
    2 x 6-barrel 30 mm AK-630M submachine gun 2 x 6-barrel 30 mm AK-630M submachine gun
    MANPADS MANPADS "Igla-1E" - 8 pcs. MANPADS "Igla-1E" - 8 pcs. there is no data
    Torpedo tubes DTA-53-11356 - 2 х 2 pcs, in side niches, caliber 533 mm with "Purga" fire control system, ammunition - torpedoes of types SET-65SE, ​​53-65KE
    DTA-53-11356 - 2 х 2 pcs, in side niches, caliber 533 mm with "Purga" fire control system, ammunition load - torpedoes of types SET-65SE, ​​53-65KE DTA-53-11356 - 2 х 2 pcs, in side niches, caliber 533 mm with "Purga" fire control system, ammunition load - torpedoes of the SET-65SE, ​​53-65KE types
    RBU-6000 RBU-RPE-8E complex - 1 installation in the bow of the ship, ammunition 48 RSL-60 or 90R
    RBU-6000 complex RPK-8E - 1 installation in the bow of the ship, ammunition 48 RSL-60 or 90R no data
    Jamming 4 KT-216 launchers of the PK-10 "Smely" complex 4 KT-216 launchers of the "Smely" PK-10 complex no data
    Helicopter landing pad and hangar for a Ka-28 or Ka-31 helicopter landing pad and hangar for a Ka-28 or Ka-31 helicopter landing pad and hangar for a Ka-28 or Ka-31 helicopter
    1. +1
      27 March 2015 13: 27
      By the way, there was infa, supposedly someone's bright head decided to put AK-630 instead of Chestnuts. What, really what?
      1. +2
        27 March 2015 13: 43
        They were put on the photo and look, a pair of ancient ak630
      2. +3
        27 March 2015 14: 11
        Quote: Wiruz
        By the way, there was infa, supposedly someone's bright head decided to put AK-630 instead of Chestnuts. What, really what?

        True. The last "daggers / kashatnas" have gone to the Indians, but about the new Nudelman's "Broadsword / palm" they write that the complex is still damp.
        KBP has announced a sea "shell" - wait, sir.
    2. +1
      27 March 2015 16: 52
      Not indicated seaworthiness. Can I go to the far sea zone? If it can, then the ship is wonderful ... especially with Chestnut / Shell.
  7. +4
    27 March 2015 12: 51
    ahah, you most importantly missed the lead today should go on the way drinks
  8. +1
    27 March 2015 12: 56
    What friends! A blow to the US-European embargo! Long voyage to this ship. soldier
    1. +6
      27 March 2015 13: 04
      Diesel generators are imported on frigates, but you can’t be without electricity. The embargo can harm us very much here. Hurry up
  9. BAT
    0
    27 March 2015 12: 57
    And it pleases!!! The more we have all sorts of warships - large and small, the greater the headache of our opponents ...
  10. +10
    27 March 2015 13: 14
    I don’t understand why everyone is happy? The fact that he will soon, perhaps, with God's help, come to the test? To this? And let's rejoice that both Essen and Grigorovich should have joined the Black Sea Fleet that year. Let's also rejoice that, according to the plan, the third and fourth ships of the series should have passed the tests for a long time; and the fifth and sixth - at least, be launched (the sixth, by the way, was not laid).

    The situation with the construction of new surface ships is simply awful, with the exception of representatives of project 21631, but everyone is happy about something. After that, 4 years Grena will be put into operation, will you be happy again? request
    1. +1
      27 March 2015 13: 20
      so he doesn’t depend on us anything .. obviously there are serious problems ... in this case, the titmouse in the hands is better than the crane in the sky.
      what sways 21631 there, too, not everything is as good as it seems, there is SU from MTU ... there are questions about them too
      1. KAB
        KAB
        +3
        27 March 2015 16: 07
        We had three nuclear super suitcases at the joke, for fifteen years, two of them were lost while being practically new, so it was possible to modernize and bring them to mind, each of them could modernize the enemy’s ACG. First we need to learn how to store what we inherited, although it’s too late.
    2. Bombardier
      +3
      27 March 2015 13: 22
      Yes, we know that there are problems. But against the background of all these problems, it’s always good to hear that such a ship is preparing for mooring trials. Well, what do we have to grieve at this moment?
    3. 0
      27 March 2015 13: 46
      When they enter, we will rejoice, including Grena)
    4. +1
      27 March 2015 14: 13
      Quote: Wiruz
      After that, 4 years Grena will be commissioned

      And you, comrade, are an optimist, however ... smile
      1. 0
        27 March 2015 23: 51
        I would wait for Carapace, within reasonable limits for those where it is technically still possible. The cost is still 330,533 ... plus inflation, plus "cuts" - it's hard to count at the new exchange rate against the dollar! fellow
  11. +1
    27 March 2015 13: 22
    Keep sanding ...
    And why not Calm with 9M317 missiles that hit 50-70 km, not replaced by Redoubt. As far as I know, the 9M96M is not much different in size and weight from the 9M317, but it only hits 120-150 km. It’s just ridiculous: the project 20380 corvette has more than twice the long-range air defense system than frigate 11356 winked
    1. +5
      27 March 2015 13: 26
      this is not funny, but the fact that the 20380 corvette can launch an anti-aircraft missile beyond the horizon, but cannot see beyond its nose
      1. 0
        27 March 2015 13: 30
        this is not funny, but the fact that the 20380 corvette can launch an anti-aircraft missile beyond the horizon, but cannot see beyond its nose

        Well, they promised to solve the problem with highlighting the targets by putting the Polyment headlights. At 20385 and 20386 we will see them good
        1. +1
          27 March 2015 13: 44
          you cannot win much with promises alone
        2. +5
          27 March 2015 13: 47
          all-weather "bio"
          put the lights ...
    2. +1
      27 March 2015 13: 31
      And why not Calm with 9M317 missiles that hit 50-70 km, not replaced by Redoubt
      so redoubts have not yet been brought to mind
      It’s just ridiculous: the project 20380 corvette has more than twice the long-range air defense system than frigate 11356

      in fact, everything is wrong .. missiles and missiles Furke are not able to provide guidance even at 40 km ... or do you think that when illuminated by a cougar when tested from a good life
    3. +1
      27 March 2015 14: 36
      [quote = Wiruz] Keep sanding ...
      And why not Calm with 9M317 missiles that hit 50-70 km, not replaced by Redoubt.
      it’s just then that the cost of the frigate is comparable with the applet and the construction time will increase due to the production of the redoubt
    4. -1
      27 March 2015 16: 55
      Quote: Wiruz
      Keep sanding ...
      And why not Calm with 9M317 missiles that hit 50-70 km, not replaced by Redoubt. As far as I know, the 9M96M is not much different in size and weight from the 9M317, but it only hits 120-150 km. It’s just ridiculous: the project 20380 corvette has more than twice the long-range air defense system than frigate 11356 winked

      Just no comment, couch deputy com fleet ...
  12. Joro
    -5
    27 March 2015 13: 37
    These are the ships we need. We need armadas, fleets of such ships. Instead of vbuhivat money into some "destroyers". And for an armada of such frigates - 6 huge cruisers for quality reinforcement.
    1. +2
      27 March 2015 14: 10
      "Some destroyers" will be equipped with nuclear power plants, that is, they will have unlimited capabilities along the way.
    2. +3
      27 March 2015 14: 26
      destroyers are the foundation of the modern fleet.
      1. Joro
        -3
        27 March 2015 16: 05
        The basis of the modern fleet has always been frigates / corvettes (TFR) and MRK. The so-called "destroyers", which have long been not destroyers at all, but huge missile and artillery ships, cannot exist in the main fleet due to their enormous size, cost and therefore small numbers. It's like calling the cruisers pr.1164 or 1144 as the backbone of the fleet. The last ones in our navy are a lot. On the Northern Fleet. How can a battleship in the amount of one piece be the basis of the fleet?
  13. 0
    27 March 2015 15: 33
    A frigate is not a destroyer.

    to be precise - a multi-purpose frigate of the far sea zone.

    and the destroyer is the destroyer. Do not confuse.

    In the Navy we have this project - submitted. - Project 956 destroyers.

    For example - destroyer project 956-A "Sarych" - the flagship of the Baltic Fleet of the Russian Navy "Persistent"

    At the moment - the project is being developed - "Leader". Project of a promising destroyer of the ocean zone.

    19.06.2009/2009/26 ITAR-TASS informs that by the end of 2012 it is planned to hold a competition to select the developer of the project of a promising destroyer for the Russian Navy, and on June 1 of the same year the Commander-in-Chief of the Russian Navy V.Vysotsky states that already in 2012 construction of destroyers of a new project will begin. On February 2012, 25, the Commander-in-Chief of the Navy V.Vysotsky announced that in 2012 the technical appearance of a destroyer of this class will be determined. On June 2012, 5, the head of the USC Roman Trotsenko announced to the media that the design of a promising destroyer is already being carried out by the Northern PKB (St. Petersburg), and that the ship will be equipped with elements of anti-missile and anti-space defense. According to the annual report of the Northern PKB for XNUMX, during the year, work on the Leader design and development work amounted to XNUMX% of the company's product output.

    On February 26, 2013, RIA Novosti published information that a competition for conducting research work "Leader" was announced for the development of a preliminary design for the creation of a new destroyer, the financing of which was included in the State Defense Order for 2013. The R&D completion date is the end of 2013. The Severnoye PKB will surely participate in the competition for the creation of the preliminary design of the ship, the other participants in the competition are unknown. After summing up the results of the preliminary design competition, it is planned to carry out R&D in 2014, and the construction of the lead ship is still planned to begin in 2016 (source). 11.09.2013/26.12.2013/XNUMX and XNUMX/XNUMX/XNUMX Commander-in-Chief of the Russian Navy Viktor Chirkov, when visiting the Northern Design Bureau, got acquainted with the progress of the design of the destroyer.

    At the beginning of 2015, the development of the outline design of the destroyer continues (source). 20.02.2015/XNUMX/XNUMX, the Commander-in-Chief of the Navy announced that design work is underway on the emintz with nuclear power plants.

    Our forecast (September 28.09.2013, 2016): with a high probability, the laying of the ship will take place according to plan - in 2017, but the real construction will begin in 2018-2020. or even after XNUMX - this is due to current trends in financing large projects in the construction of the Navy, as well as the unavailability of many components of equipment and weapons systems of the future ship.
    1. +1
      31 March 2015 00: 37
      It is scary to imagine how long it will take to build at least one destroyer, if the four times smaller "Admiral Gorshkov" cannot be handed over to the fleet for 10 years already.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  14. +3
    27 March 2015 15: 35
    A tentative view of one of the variants of the project of a promising destroyer for the Russian Navy - R&D "Leader"
    1. Joro
      -6
      27 March 2015 16: 09
      This is not a destroyer. A destroyer is a small fast ship, the basis of which is a torpedo weapon, which, due to its small size and high speed, can in some situations be successfully used against ships of the main class - battleships and aircraft carriers. And this is not a destroyer. This is a giant aircraft-carrying nuclear missile cruiser. Call a spade a spade, gentlemen. Otherwise we'll be like the Japanese. Which already has aircraft carriers comparable in size to the super-battleship "Yamato" are called "destroyers-helicopter carriers."
      1. +4
        27 March 2015 16: 32
        The destroyer is a small high-speed ship, the main weapon of which is a torpedo weapon, which this boat due to its small size and high speed can successfully use in some situations against ships of the main class - battleships and aircraft carriers.

        What century do you live? :)
        1. ded10041948
          +3
          28 March 2015 06: 20
          Apparently, "Joro", except for numbered destroyers of the early 20th century, has never heard of other ships of this class.
        2. Joro
          0
          29 March 2015 07: 02
          Quote: Kornilovist
          What century do you live? :)

          This follows from the name itself - the destroyer. Destroyer.
        3. Joro
          0
          29 March 2015 07: 02
          Quote: Kornilovist
          What century do you live? :)

          This follows from the name itself - the destroyer. Destroyer.
  15. 0
    27 March 2015 16: 16
    Ships are super. Moreover, any, because it's time to write off the old people. But I personally care about the issue of the location of the fleet. I wonder how we do with this.
    1. +1
      27 March 2015 16: 34
      And what does Severomorsk, Sevastopol, Baltiysk, Vladivostok not suit you? :)
  16. +3
    27 March 2015 18: 32
    Quote: Wiruz
    Keep sanding ...
    And why not Calm with 9M317 missiles that hit 50-70 km, not replaced by Redoubt. As far as I know, the 9M96M is not much different in size and weight from the 9M317, but it only hits 120-150 km. It’s just ridiculous: the project 20380 corvette has more than twice the long-range air defense system than frigate 11356 winked

    Replace "Calm" with "Redoubt" and you get "Admiral Gorshkov", incl. and at cost.
  17. 0
    27 March 2015 20: 30
    Yes, we are lagging behind in the pace of the construction of the fleet, and for all this, we are grateful to our liberals in power, who, in addition to cutting the budget, can do nothing more efficiently! We lag behind and adjust plans for the submarine fleet and the air. For almost all of our managers have perfectly mastered the American courses of cutting folk money!
    It’s time to transfer enterprises working for state defense orders to round-the-clock work.
  18. 0
    28 March 2015 11: 09
    I support, in three shifts, and tight control from the "Serdyukovs".
  19. 0
    28 March 2015 17: 16
    Quote: Wiruz
    Keep sanding ...
    And why not Calm with 9M317 missiles that hit 50-70 km, not replaced by Redoubt. As far as I know, the 9M96M is not much different in size and weight from the 9M317, but it only hits 120-150 km. It’s just funny: the project 20380 corvette has more than twice the long-range air defense system than the frigate 11356 winked


    Because 11356:
    1) Frigate for the poor.
    2) It has what has been shooting for a long time.
    3) If you put a redoubt, you will have to shove and radar Poliment, which is expensive, there is not very expensive !! (see paragraph 1)
    4) With a redoubt, not everything is clear yet. (See clause 2)
    5) Cheap and cheerful.