Crimea has its own logo

54
In the studio of Artemy Lebedev, a logo was developed for the Crimea. A year after the Crimea joined the peninsula, Russia received a new logo and a system of visual identification.

This is the main logo:
Crimea logo


So look at its various modifications:
Crimea has its own logo













This is how the navigation stand looks like:


And this is what the logo looks like for application on clothes:


I hope that take root.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

54 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +11
    27 March 2015 07: 39
    Nice. Time will tell whether it will take root. Actually it can. With or without a logo, Crimea is still Russian!
    1. +59
      27 March 2015 07: 41
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      With or without a logo, Crimea is still Russian!

      that's for sure. to this topic Yes
      1. +18
        27 March 2015 07: 55
        Well, I don’t know .. a personal opinion hi - somehow clumsy-blurry ...
        As far as I understand, the logo should be bright, striking and, at the same time, clear and simple, so that even a child could reproduce it. Here, like the girl on the T-shirt, or the 6th from the top (with the "beggar in the mountains" laughing just like from a pack of "Pamir" laughing )
        1. +1
          27 March 2015 08: 31
          Quote: Sacmagon
          - somehow clumsy-blurry ...

          The first resembles a wrapper from creme brulee. The former is still delicious winked
          1. 0
            28 March 2015 16: 10
            Well, what the logo does, but some (especially the main one) look very bright and spotty, like a tsigansky camp, the word Crimea itself is almost invisible
        2. 0
          27 March 2015 15: 49
          Quote: Sacmagon
          As I understand it, the logo should be bright, striking and, at the same time, clear and simple

          yellow-black colors should be excluded in one logo!
    2. +4
      27 March 2015 07: 58
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      Nice. Time will tell whether it will take root. Actually it can. With or without a logo, Crimea is still Russian!


      No logo. Not memorable. Maybe someday they will come up with a better one. The main thing is not in the logo, but in the "inexpensive" vacation with a high level of comfort and service. Then you will have a memorable vacation and want to come again
      1. +25
        27 March 2015 08: 06
        I wanted to write about the logo ... Changed my mind.
        Something seems to me that Artemy Lebedev has gotten too hungry. Moreover, his so-called. "creativity" of this "designer" spoiled the symbol of the Soviet and now the Russian army, not only did he rake in an unreal amount of dough for this unrealistic amount of money - so now he continues to "creative" further. In a word, I am against the creativity of this figure, since his imagination is clearly limited and there is a complete misunderstanding of WHAT should be reflected in the logos.
        FAILURE !!!
        1. +5
          27 March 2015 08: 42
          Quote: Metallurg
          FAILURE !!!

          What, besides Lebedev and "mudashkin" there are no designers? Some kind of bad taste, reminiscent of the posters of the 30s of Ostap Bender, or as Sakmagon wrote, "just like from a pack of" Pamir " laughing ".
        2. +4
          27 March 2015 08: 45
          Quote: Metallurg
          FAILURE !!!

          Straight to the point: you see, "creativity of creakl" evaporates over time "like a dream, like a morning mist", the most important thing is that there is no MEMORABILITY ...
          1. +5
            27 March 2015 08: 53
            "creativity of creacles" evaporates over time

            The fatter (bastlasts) and the more creative the creature is, the more he puffs to no avail.
            And we see the result - children's creativity.
            The logo should be clear, memorable.
            And most importantly - so that it can be easily repeated!
        3. CrimeaNYASH
          +3
          27 March 2015 10: 36
          Tyoma Lebedev is a worthy son of her mother Tatiana Tolstoy with her "School of Scandal (!!!)" on Russian TV. In addition, Lebedev's designers work, in addition to Moscow and St. Petersburg, in Kiev and New York ... It's funny, isn't it? In the logo under discussion, there is not a hint of the heroic past of Crimea, not of viticulture, tourism, or even its (Crimea) geographical silhouette. But there is a lot of camouflage (???), puffs of white smoke (like from phosphorus in Odessa) and the foolishly stylized word "Crimea" .. Well at least I did without hints of the notorious "Crimeanash" ... Well, about the symbols of open locks in letters and the number "1" people may think that Tyoma did it "by accident" ...
        4. +1
          28 March 2015 00: 18
          Quote: Metallurg
          Moreover, his so-called. "creativity" of this "designer" spoiled the symbol of the Soviet and now the Russian army, not only did he rake in an unreal amount of dough for this unrealistic amount of money - so now he continues to "creative" further.

          I agree that one fucked up, but there are others who raised this "trash" on the "shield".
        5. +3
          28 March 2015 08: 05
          FAILURE !!!

          Our most AWESOME logo of all time is HAMMER AND SICKLE.
          Let them try to create something like that.
      2. +2
        27 March 2015 08: 11
        Perhaps this is a gift from the studio - it was not paid.
        Therefore, there was no task for him and other "procedures".
        As a result, we see what we see.
      3. 0
        27 March 2015 10: 08
        There is a small problem with this, I am about comfort. In Yevpatoriya, almost all sanatoriums are in a deplorable state. Only private owners remain.
    3. +4
      27 March 2015 08: 40
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      Nice.

      I do not find.
      Absolutely not informative, there is NO Crimea in this emblem!
      "Take it and get it off!"
      A tender must be announced - then it will be possible to choose something along the way!
    4. +5
      27 March 2015 08: 55
      It looks like someone was full of colors. And when the colors came out, this logo came out.
      1. Atanda
        0
        27 March 2015 09: 08
        On ice cream in waffle cups it would look more organic. Well, or on Porashenko’s forehead, as someone already noticed ...;)
    5. Atanda
      +4
      27 March 2015 08: 58
      Well, how could he be entrusted with the Crimea logo?
      His blog on livejournal is http://tema.livejournal.com/1621899.html
    6. 0
      27 March 2015 09: 01
      That's right, there is a region of the Russian Federation, there should be its logo.
    7. The comment was deleted.
    8. +2
      27 March 2015 11: 00
      To paraphrase a well-known anecdote: "Some kind of garbage, but Lebedev says LOGO!"
    9. Alexan
      +4
      27 March 2015 11: 51
      The Crimea logo was already there. Whether it is good or bad is another matter. But without a competition, giving an order to the Russophobe and the adventurer who did not support the annexation of Crimea is simply criminal! In my opinion, Artemy got crap, like most of his works.
      1. 0
        27 March 2015 23: 08
        In my opinion, his most successful (Lebedev) work is the Yandex logo smile
  2. +2
    27 March 2015 07: 39
    Only orange is not necessary. As well okay.
    1. +7
      27 March 2015 07: 46
      The word "our" has been forgotten. To make such a logo, it will be a resounding success.
    2. 0
      27 March 2015 08: 47
      Quote: siberalt
      Only orange is not necessary.

      That's the orange that will be in demand among pro-liberal suckers!
  3. +1
    27 March 2015 07: 40
    CIRCLE - the primary symbol of unity and infinity, a sign of absolute and perfection ...
  4. +3
    27 March 2015 07: 42
    My daughter, when she saw a bag and a T-shirt with a logo, immediately said: Cool, I also want..
  5. +5
    27 March 2015 07: 48
    You can minus, but it seems to me that sculpting a kind of "label" on the Russian Peninsula is some kind of "managerial and marketing" move, and the place itself is so important for us. Pearl of Russia!
    1. +5
      27 March 2015 07: 55
      So it is, but the goal of the move is to popularize Crimea, incl. designation that he is Russian, i.e. belongs to Russia. This must be done in all convenient ways.
      1. 0
        27 March 2015 08: 22
        Quote: Cheshire
        So it is, but the goal of the move is to popularize Crimea, incl. designation that he is Russian, i.e. belongs to Russia

        And in the popularization of Crimea, and in collecting taxes for the use of the logo. Well, it will rise in price for a little far from cheap vacation!
  6. +1
    27 March 2015 07: 49
    Logo needed. In Soviet times, there was a car, it sold poorly under its name abroad, its factory name somehow frightened foreign buyers laughing and so it was decided to make a new logo for it, called "Yalta" and sales went.
  7. +8
    27 March 2015 08: 03
    I live in the Urals, far from the Crimea, and it all happened a year ago. But when I hear the word Crimea, indescribable feelings dash in, then there is pride for the Country and gratitude to Crimeans and admiration for their courage and unanimity. Crimeans- You are true Russians, for me an example to follow. Thank you for being with us.
  8. +3
    27 March 2015 08: 12
    Our Crimea is healthy, natural, but when will our provincial Siberian town be accepted into the Russian Federation, otherwise life will get worse and worse hi
    1. +3
      27 March 2015 09: 10
      Quote: SAHALIN
      Siberian town will be part of the Russian Federation, otherwise life is getting worse and worse

      But the TV, that is, it means you can stele travel in Crimea! Yes, it is better to Thailand or Vietnam - nature is richer, the service can not be compared and much cheaper. And then to us, to Lake Baikal! fellow
  9. wanderer
    +4
    27 March 2015 08: 15
    CRIMEA, IT IS ALWAYS RUSSIA, AT ALL TIMES !!!!!!!!
  10. 0
    27 March 2015 08: 16
    And rightly so, Crimea is a special territory, generously watered with Russian blood ...... which means its place in Russia is special ......
  11. +5
    27 March 2015 08: 16
    from the "logo" there is one name ...
    nonsense, in short!
  12. sazhka4
    +4
    27 March 2015 08: 17
    Why weren't 50 shades of gray also shown? What is the "trick"? Money down the drain and nothing more.
  13. +2
    27 March 2015 08: 29
    Somehow it doesn’t catch ... It looks like a child’s drawing. Comrades should be more serious) or something - such an event! Such a region. The mountains-sea are better there, and Moscow and the Bastion must be included there).
  14. +2
    27 March 2015 08: 31
    And where are the colors of the Russian flag + the silhouette of the peninsula itself. Blurred some kind of blot. Do not set off.
    1. CrimeaNYASH
      0
      27 March 2015 10: 54
      The true owners of the Crimea are not at all going to discuss with the bydlop diploma what the logo of the Crimea should be like. It is said - it will be like that and that's it. In camouflage and clubs of white smoke like phosphorus in Odessa.
  15. Atanda
    +7
    27 March 2015 08: 32
    Lebedev is joking! What the hell is this ?! Govnologotyp! The country is full of talented designers, they would have held a nationwide competition for the best logo, assigned a prize of 5 ye and the result would have pleased! And this Lebedev homogeneous looks like a chevron of a punitive battalion.
  16. 0
    27 March 2015 08: 42
    I don’t know how to relate to the general concept. Everyone has different tastes. But I liked the logo with the tourist who goes on a hike. Crimea is associated with hiking. What a place!
  17. 0
    27 March 2015 08: 53
    Bullshit or not bullshit, but Parashenka’s forehead would look nice ....
  18. +3
    27 March 2015 09: 03
    not really .... the logo should carry a certain semantic load, evoke associations, excite consciousness and memory .... peninsula, symbols of the Crimea, memorable places, historical places, places of military glory, where is all this ???
    I, as a person who lived in the Crimea until the age of 14 and is still visiting his parents there, did not cause any associations ... unfortunately ...
    1. Atanda
      +1
      27 March 2015 09: 14
      Forgive me, my friend, I wanted to plyusanut! It happened by accident. Totally agree with you!
    2. CrimeaNYASH
      -1
      27 March 2015 10: 56
      In vain. There is a lot of information in this logo. It depends on how you look!
  19. +1
    27 March 2015 09: 18
    Quote: Atanda
    Forgive me, my friend, I wanted to plyusanut! It happened by accident. Totally agree with you!

    nothing, comrades will fix it right now (I hope! wink )
    1. +1
      27 March 2015 09: 45
      Quote: svu93
      nothing, comrades will fix it now (I hope! wink)


      No problem! hi
  20. 0
    27 March 2015 09: 23
    Guys, in my opinion, the logo is not our problem, such a foolishness in all seriousness to brainwash. Seriously - it's a coat of arms, a hymn and a flag. Crimea is still not a corporation - it will be small.
    1. +1
      27 March 2015 11: 30
      Subject and tourist mecca, consider the face of Russia in politics and on vacation. By the way, our national symbols are not up to par yet. As an example, the more advanced information systems of the USSR and tsarist Russia, which had much more subtle, completed, honed, imperial, etc. (select the desired) position.
  21. 0
    27 March 2015 09: 25
    I think the logo is not bad. Especially the first option, where you can see the sun, clouds, mountains, sea. A tourist is also a good find. Other options are perhaps too vague, some resemble camouflage. It would be very appropriate to add "our" to them, as suggested above. On the girl's T-shirt, the circle looks empty, reminiscent of a car nameplate.
    About the font - visually the letter M looks heavier than all the others, although of course the emphasis should be on the first - K.
    1. 0
      27 March 2015 10: 14
      it is camouflage ...
      worst of all is that "m" has a pronounced vector \ arrow pointing down ...
    2. CrimeaNYASH
      -1
      27 March 2015 11: 07
      Quote: gramatey
      I think the logo is not bad. Especially the first option, where you can see the sun, clouds, mountains, sea. A tourist is also a good find. Other options are perhaps too vague, some resemble camouflage. It would be very appropriate to add "our" to them, as suggested above. On the girl's T-shirt, the circle looks empty, reminiscent of a car nameplate.
      About the font - visually the letter M looks heavier than all the others, although of course the emphasis should be on the first - K.

      SO as on this stupid logo, the sun can look, only when it is in smoke, brown. But if anyone thinks that Lebedev drew this logo "from the bulldozer", then he is mistaken. That is why there is so much white smoke (or clouds?) In cloudless -that Crimea is a very bad sign for the inhabitants of Crimea ... As well as camouflage motives .. So whoever is in the subject will understand, and who is a steupid, let him continue to squeal for "krymnash"
      1. 0
        April 4 2015 01: 30
        Quote: Crimea
        and further squeals for "krymnash"

        It’s unfortunate that your country has become a vassal of the United States. But it’s okay, soon Russia will again become united and whole, having regained the cradle of Kievan Rus.
  22. +5
    27 March 2015 09: 36
    Bullshit, not a logo. This is just another cut dough Lebedev and his office.
    The logo should be remembered and be original. Remember Arrl. The apple is bitten off. Windows - also remembered. Adidas - three stripes.
    It’s just a color blot with an ugly font.
    How much Artemy cut the money, it's just out ...
    Here is what I found:
    ... According to an employee of the Ministry of Health, Lebedev requested a project amount of "two to three million rubles." The Crimean authorities considered it too high, given their budget. The agency refused to cooperate, but then again entered into negotiations with the studio ...
  23. +4
    27 March 2015 09: 39
    In my opinion this is hack. Some mountains, sea, sun can hardly be guessed in the logo, as if everything that Crimea is all about is just a Rastaman resort and some kind of lgbteshnye colors.
  24. +1
    27 March 2015 10: 13
    I’ll add about the font, leaving aside the personal hostility to this author in principle:
    The font is frankly "loose" in it, there is no clarity and firmness. And I would like to see the unyielding embodiment of intentions and hopes. Patriotism - in one word.
    In the image construction schedule, a motive of movement is used (poorly developed)
    From the left to the right from the stroke "K" there is an arc to "M" and further down the looping - a circle, the movement in a circle does not give special movement and swiftness, and even the inclined vector of the inscription does not help. Further, the logo has 3 vertical strokes, two arrows (m, k) and two thin "monograms" (p, s).
    Now for the sound, three bold strokes and three thin monograms give an intermittent low note with faint, deliberate cries of monograms. Two arrows-vectors complete the picture, one thin (k) is turned back to one of the vertical strokes, the other thick-strong (m) is directed down and further in a circle ...

    In general, my preparation is just a conceptual analysis, but it would be interesting to hear what exactly is actually embedded in the sign.
    I liked the embodiment of "all-season" - the only plus.
    1. 0
      27 March 2015 10: 26
      My fault - with my crooked fingers I poked instead of plus to minus. Excuse me generously. A little stunned by such a detailed analysis. A little more in defense of the Lebedev version - I liked the find with the letter Y, which at the same time is similar to And, thereby giving a bilingual spelling - Crimea and Crim.
  25. +1
    27 March 2015 10: 25


    - Terrible bad taste and sloppiness!

  26. +2
    27 March 2015 10: 25
    I wonder how much this logo cost
  27. 0
    27 March 2015 10: 44
    The logo is somehow destructive - decaying. Do not take this.
    1. CrimeaNYASH
      -1
      27 March 2015 11: 52
      Quote: total commander
      The logo is somehow destructive - decaying. Do not take this.

      What can you see on this logo (if you open your eyes!)? The outlines of the peninsula are not visible, because everything is in white smoke (or is it steam from boiling water). The sea is worried, and even as the size of the waves are huge. The sun is brown, that is, everything is in smoke. Camouflage motives do not hint at the natural origin of the cataclysm-disaster. A dude with food in his backpack is trying to escape in the mountains .. However, two symbols of open locks drawn by Lebedev (in the word "Crimea") hint that there will be TWO ways to escape. And you can also see the number "1", but what exactly does it mean - let everyone strain their brains. If anyone thinks that this logo is just a flight of Lebedev's imagination, he is a fool. I personally think that Tyoma received clear instructions from its owners ... And it is not for nothing that this logo does not contain the word "our".
  28. msm
    msm
    +2
    27 March 2015 11: 02
    No one has accepted this logo. This is a private initiative of the author, which he himself spread! Yes
  29. xdweb
    +1
    27 March 2015 11: 04
    The logo is nothing at all
  30. 0
    27 March 2015 21: 22
    Beautiful logos. That's right.
  31. 0
    27 March 2015 23: 58
    As a designer, it is not "pretty" and does not "roll" ... How does this logo fit the Crimea? Who did it? Did a man live here in Crimea? It's a pity if they accept.
  32. 0
    28 March 2015 00: 03
    If this will be officially, it is shame and shame! What a camouflage !? Is it dark like Mount Bear (Ayu-Dag)? Or a hippopotamus mountain? The logo should be simple and recognizable ..... And let's leave beautiful pictures for children to draw on wallpaper, they are at least natural! )))
  33. 0
    28 March 2015 07: 12
    And I, regardless of the success of the logo itself, do not like the fact that "again the Studio of Art. Lebedev" .. Do we have any others? Someone lobbies so robustly and it is annoying. At one time, everywhere in Moscow, Tsaritelli's monuments and sculptures appeared on every corner. Now Lebedev. How many design studios are there in the country. And none could do better? I do not believe!

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"