Is Kudrin's resignation a sign of a split in the elite?

Is Kudrin's resignation a sign of a split in the elite?Aleksey Kudrin publicly explained his resignation by disagreement with “overstated” budget spending, but the traditions of Russian politics allow commentators to argue about a deeper underlying reason for his departure, right up to the ideological split in the ruling elite.

“For several months, despite my numerous objections, including public, in the sphere of budget policy decisions were made, no doubt, increasing the risks of budget execution,” - this is, according to Kudrin, the main reason for his departure.
Kudrin said that he had long since decided to leave, and "emotions have nothing to do with it." This, however, does not explain the loud and demonstrative manner in which he left was not entirely typical of Russian politics.

The head of the Regnum news agency, an employee of the presidential administration in 2005-2007, is Modest Kolerov, who is the main author of the Kudrin scandal.

"The budget risks associated primarily with the overestimated obligations in the defense sector and the social sphere would inevitably spread to the entire national economy" from Alexey Kudrin’s statement about the reasons for his resignation

“For a second this man in the paroxysm of his greatness suggested that he would now face Putin and Medvedev with their heads, and Putin would say: well, stay, Alex, I love you,” Kolerov sneers.

This is not forgottenAccording to his assessment, Kudrin’s Washington statement that he would not work in the government of Medvedev was such a demonstrative attack against the future prime minister that he could no longer forgive his tandem.

"His previous statement, they say, do not do it, Medvedev and Putin, nonsense, spend primaries in your United Russia and decide which of you is in charge, according to the Minister of Finance, was already hooliganism, but it did not affect the systemic assessments of professionalism , programs and so on, "Kolerov told

A publicist, editor of the politics department of the Kommersant newspaper, Gleb Cherkasov, believes that the expulsion of Kudrin demonstrates the desire of the Russian rulers on the eve of difficult times to ensure complete external unity and unquestioning obedience within the power structures.

"September 24 determined the structure of power in our country for the long term. I was also determined. Emotions have absolutely nothing to do with it"
from the statement of Alexei Kudrin about the reasons for resignation

“The bosses are very well aware that there is a very difficult period ahead, primarily from an economic point of view, and on the threshold of it they want to accumulate as much as possible the resource that they believe provides unity,” said Cherkasov at

According to Cherkasov, discussions will no longer be allowed even to such an authoritative member of the government as Kudrin, who has worked alongside Putin for more than 11 years and survived the three Prime Ministers dismissed by Putin.

Conditional conflictThe billionaire and failed leader of the Right Cause party, Mikhail Prokhorov, wrote on his blog on Tuesday that Kudrin’s resignation confirms his thesis about the conflict between conditional “conservatives” and “modernizers” in the ruling elite.

“Allegedly, the opportunity that existed for me to head the Right Cause was actually absent for me. I did not consider for myself the prospect of participating in an artificial project that actually discredits the liberal democratic idea”

“It is clear that the reason for the resignation of Mr. Kudrin is not in a personal conflict with the President, but in a conflict of concepts, views on the further development of the country,” writes Prokhorov. True, he is now not quite sure who to regard as a “conservative,” but whom he is a “modernizer.”

A well-known Russian economist and liberal, scientific director of the Higher School of Economics Yevgeny Yasin speaks about the ideological discrepancy.
“This is a certain split in the elite — maybe insignificant, but expressive. It’s not just personal sympathies and antipathies, but rather fairly basic lines in politics,” Yasin told Interfax, commenting on the resignation of the finance minister with the image of a liberal in economics and politics.

Political consultant Dmitry Orlov, who is close to the Kremlin, also sees a sign of ideological differences in Kudrin’s departure, but only presents them in a completely different way.

"This is a conflict between conservatives in the face of Kudrin and supporters of more vigorous growth," Orlov said at
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. mitrich
    mitrich 28 September 2011 07: 48 New
    • 0
    • 0
    There was nothing to shake the tongue where necessary and not necessary. And then Mr. Kudrin seems to have decided that God grabbed his beard (meaning reassessment of his own personality and place in history). So I got a knee under the ass. I would not be surprised if he soon finds himself in the same company with Kasyanov, Nemtsov, Kasparov and other "dissidents."
  2. Banshee 28 September 2011 08: 13 New
    • 0
    • 0
    The situation once again confirmed the saying that there are no irreplaceable people. Especially when it comes to big money and big politics.
  3. Owl
    Owl 28 September 2011 10: 26 New
    • 2
    • 0
    Kudrin was one of the few in the government who had education in his specialty and scientific work, all the rest were “wash and saw” lovers who stupidly obey orders of enemies and traitors.
    1. alk60
      alk60 30 September 2011 11: 14 New
      • 0
      • 0
      and you have supporting documents about the rest?
      What you smart, not from the Cheka for an hour?
  4. Ion coaelung
    Ion coaelung 28 September 2011 10: 35 New
    • 0
    • 0
    For what merits did he receive Western bonuses? For the same services, he was fired. Sub-Zapad!
  5. zczczc
    zczczc 28 September 2011 12: 12 New
    • 2
    • 0
    Kudrin’s resignation is a sign of the dead end of the liberal path. Kudrin’s resignation is Putin’s decision about the impossibility of going to the polls with the brain of liberal reforms. But what the brain will change, Putin has not decided yet.