Military Review

American Committee to Protect Journalists seeks to lift the ban on broadcasting Ukrainian media in Crimea

72
The Committee to Protect US Journalists has responded to the statement by the head of the Crimea, Sergei Aksyonov, that the republic "will not work today to distribute Ukrainian broadcasting" on its territory.

American Committee to Protect Journalists seeks to lift the ban on broadcasting Ukrainian media in Crimea


“Today’s words of Sergey Aksenov confirm our most serious concerns that the media climate in Crimea is worsening day by day,” quotes the representative of the CPJ in the European and Central Asian region Muzaffar Suleymanov RIA "News".

Suleimanov stressed that the Crimean authorities should “change the repressive policy and recognize the right of local residents to receive a wide range of News and information.

Meanwhile, in the CPJ for a month there is a request to comment on the decision of Kiev to suspend the accreditation of a number of Russian media in the Ukrainian government structures. Representatives of the committee only assure that "the experts will answer as soon as they study this topic."

It is worth recalling that Sevastopol and the Crimea became part of the Russian Federation after the referendum held last spring. According to the FMS, only 3427 people refused Russian citizenship. In total, almost 2 million people live in the republic.
Photos used:
http://ria.ru/
72 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. avvg
    avvg 25 March 2015 07: 57
    +43
    This is where the double standard in relation to freedom of speech is expressed. In Ukraine, you can suspend or close the accreditation of the Russian media, and in Crimea, you cannot suspend the Ukrainian media. The main reason is in the West to shout, or rather "crow" that "Freedom of Speech" is in danger in Crimea ...
    1. bort4145
      bort4145 25 March 2015 07: 58
      +30
      As for the lifting of the ban in Ukraine-so silent
      1. Metallurgist
        Metallurgist 25 March 2015 08: 02
        +9
        And what, on Russian channels there are few humorous programs, what else would Ukrainian watch?
        Their censor with a forum is hanging online, there are probably still a couple of "annealing" studios, and the leadership of the 404 country does not let you get bored ...
        No, no, we need to work and not talk ...
        1. fzr1000
          fzr1000 25 March 2015 08: 12
          +20
          I was in the Crimea at the weekend, in Alushta. 1 + 1, Inter and some other garbage pours dirt on the Russian Federation, nothing is turned off. America, as always, is lying.
          1. WKS
            WKS 25 March 2015 08: 43
            +1
            Quote: fzr1000
            I was in the Crimea at the weekend, in Alushta. 1 + 1, Inter and some other garbage pours dirt on the Russian Federation, nothing is turned off. America, as always, is lying.

            Is it cable or terrestrial?
            1. fzr1000
              fzr1000 25 March 2015 08: 46
              +2
              In hotel. Rather, cable.
            2. GDP
              GDP 25 March 2015 11: 39
              +3
              Similarly, I was in Feodosia. Some kind of music channel was playing on the TV set in the cafe, and on top there was an inscription - "We are for Edina Kraina!"

              So American magazines are not looking there, however they always look at the current where they are shown. Let the media fight for independence at home :)
          2. svu93
            svu93 25 March 2015 09: 35
            +1
            I confirm! was in the fall-full of Ukrainian channels and 2 or 3 Crimean Tatar with a pronounced focus in their native language. Ukrainian are caught even those that are disabled. With interference, but caught. The question is, who is watching them ???))))
          3. svu93
            svu93 25 March 2015 09: 35
            0
            I confirm! was in the fall-full of Ukrainian channels and 2 or 3 Crimean Tatar with a pronounced focus in their native language. Ukrainian are caught even those that are disabled. With interference, but caught. The question is, who is watching them ???))))
        2. Altona
          Altona 25 March 2015 09: 24
          +1
          Quote: Metallurg
          Their censor with a forum is hanging online, there are probably still a couple of "annealing" studios, and the leadership of the 404 country does not let you get bored ...

          ----------------------
          On Youtube, too, battles are going on in the comments, especially over taming - Bandera songs by Orest Lyuty and pseudo-anarchic songs by anarcho-hert GraBlya (songs, and all to the music of Soviet and Russian composers), KVN show "95 Quarter" ... On Correspondent.net too mahach goes in the comments ... laughing
      2. Serge Mikhas
        Serge Mikhas 25 March 2015 08: 26
        +8
        Why the American Union? Why not Congolese or Norwegian? Mattresses, what Ukraine already consider their state? Send away ....
      3. anfil
        anfil 25 March 2015 08: 32
        +5
        Mato in his throat is cramped from such cynicism, if he would have overlaid the opportunity, not one aircraft carrier would have endured.
      4. Rrrj
        Rrrj 25 March 2015 12: 55
        0
        Quote: bort4145
        As for the lifting of the ban in Ukraine-so silent

        Yeah. Well this is crap - like RashenToday - so you can block - you can’t here.
    2. sergi-i
      sergi-i 25 March 2015 08: 12
      +9
      Let Crimea be recognized as Russian first, and then fight for anything.
    3. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 25 March 2015 08: 12
      +2
      What do colleagues think about this ?:

      Top US Commander Under Arrest For Refusing To Fire Nukes At Russia

      A new report prepared states that U.S. President Barack Obama was dismissed and arrested by a strategic communications commander who was unable (or unwilling) to transmit nuclear weapons launch codes allowing the first strike against Russia in coordination with the same strike planned by the United Kingdom.

      U.S. Navy Captain Heather E. Cole was the U.S. Navy's strategic commander for wing 1 located at Tinker Air Force Base in Oklahoma, and its E-6B Mercury-controlled air forces provide communications channels that allow President Obama and U.S. Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter to directly contact with submarines, bombers, and ground-based missiles that make up the US strategic nuclear forces.



      The report notes that on Monday, March 16, Captain Cole received an order from the Pentagon to launch an authorization for a "limited" nuclear strike against Russia, but that failed to launch due to the critical Permissive Action Link (PAL), thus forcing her to abort this is a planned attack.

      PAL is a safety device for nuclear weapons whose purpose is to prevent the unauthorized launch or detonation of nuclear weapons.

      Experts in this report explain that the critical failure in authorizing a nuclear strike on Russia, in this case, was due to the security measure that had been implemented at the time by order of former US Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel, before his dismissal last month for his refusal to take part in this attack against Russia.

      This report further clarifies that Secretary of Defense Carter was not aware of PAL security changes by former Secretary of Defense Heigl. Thus, Captain Cole interrupted this planned nuclear attack.

      Captain Cole, on Tuesday, March 17, was relieved of her post, and then arrested and taken into custody by the armed guard of the United States Naval Aviation (NAS) Miramar in San Diego (California), where she remains in complete isolation.

      It is important to note that on March 14 we reported that, after March 15, 2015, Great Britain was preparing the first nuclear strike against Russia, that President Putin and the Moscow Region were informed about the planned nuclear attack against Russia, allowing it to prepare for this strike and the answer to this blow ..

      In addition, we reported March 15 that Obama warns that he cannot stop the war.
      1. inkass_98
        inkass_98 25 March 2015 08: 18
        +16
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        What do colleagues think about this?

        I read yesterday this heresy on another resource. Sheer conspiracy theories, "Freemasons are overthrowing Freemasons in order to put Freemasons on their revenge." For what purposes did Great Britain prepare a nuclear strike on Russia - in order to kill itself? This is not even the States, the number of survivors on the islands in the framework of a retaliatory strike will tend to statistical error.
        1. aleks 62
          aleks 62 25 March 2015 09: 47
          0
          ..... Britain for what purpose was preparing a nuclear strike on Russia - in order to commit suicide? ...

          ..... That's right .... At one time I talked with sailors who served on a diesel submarine (called "Golf" in NATO), which carried 3 ballistic missiles ..... So they said that this is quite enough, to demolish the ENTIRE UK .... I think they weren't lying ... hi
      2. Decathlon
        Decathlon 25 March 2015 08: 21
        +1
        The start of large-scale exercises of the RF Armed Forces on March 16, 2015. - is it a coincidence or combat alert ?!
      3. Faron
        Faron 25 March 2015 08: 22
        +5
        So do you think that if there was such a racket (nuclear attack) - would the public know about it? Stupidity!
      4. pensioner
        pensioner 25 March 2015 08: 25
        +4
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        What do colleagues think about this?

        It turns out that it carried. what
        You in your Rezh have nothing to be afraid of, but they intended to spray me here in the E-burg to an atomic state ... sad And I have a vacation planned for the last ice. Barbarians! am They could not have planned a nuclear war at the beginning of June when fishing from a boat is prohibited ...
        Hi Andryukha! drinks Yeah fake it yes . Not even a fake, but a fake fellow .
        1. Andrey Yuryevich
          Andrey Yuryevich 25 March 2015 08: 38
          +2
          Quote: retired
          Hi Andryukha! Yes fake it. Not even a fake, but a fake

          Hi Yura, yes I agree that bullshit! wink it’s just interesting to see how the people will react .. and if something serious happens, grab your slippers and come to me! drinks laughing hi
        2. abrakadabre
          abrakadabre 25 March 2015 10: 01
          +1
          Just want to quote the film "That same Munchausen" - about the declaration of war.
          American Committee to Protect Journalists seeks to lift the ban on broadcasting Ukrainian media in Crimea
          Only after the complete removal of restrictions on the broadcasting of any of our channels: in the USA, Europe and Ukraine in particular.
      5. Rostov
        Rostov 25 March 2015 08: 32
        +1
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        What do colleagues think about this?

        I'm not a military man, but in my opinion some kind of nonsense. In the original article, this Cole is compared with our Arkhipov and they write that he was also allegedly arrested in a similar situation, but this is not so. In general, I repeat - nonsense.
      6. The comment was deleted.
    4. varov14
      varov14 25 March 2015 09: 22
      0
      Well, I put my concerns and concerns in one place.
    5. Giant thought
      Giant thought 25 March 2015 09: 35
      +2
      Double standards of the West, as usual, in action.
    6. The comment was deleted.
    7. vodolaz
      vodolaz 25 March 2015 13: 11
      0
      That's right, nefig on our territory to bear his heresy. The main thing is to ban our channels in Ukraine, but Ukrainian channels cannot be prohibited on ours.
    8. Turkir
      Turkir 25 March 2015 13: 38
      +1
      I would answer in the place of the Crimean authorities that the ban is connected with the violation of human rights and freedom of speech throughout Ukraine.
    9. chunga-changa
      chunga-changa 25 March 2015 13: 49
      0
      Who pays the girl and dances. If a part of the money stolen in Russia was spent on bribing these same journalists, everything would have been much simpler, and there are no doubts that these journalists are absolutely corrupt.
    10. GSH-18
      GSH-18 25 March 2015 14: 09
      0
      American Committee to Protect Journalists seeks to lift the ban on broadcasting Ukrainian media in Crimea

      The American Committee has nothing more to do?
      Are they fulfilling the American state order again?
      Still, they would be indignant why, like, in the Krasnodar Territory, Rostov and Volgograd regions, Bendery television is not broadcast unbroken! laughing fool
      Well, where do people think? Hohlostan for the Crimea is a foreign country! request
  2. iner
    iner 25 March 2015 08: 00
    +13
    How tired they are, all these American committees with their double standards and lies.
  3. Deniz
    Deniz 25 March 2015 08: 00
    +7
    In general, do not care what they require there.
    They all had a record stuck in one place there, it’s already sickening and too lazy to listen.
  4. Mother Theresa
    Mother Theresa 25 March 2015 08: 02
    +6
    that the republic "will not work today on the dissemination of Ukrainian broadcasting" on its territory. What else should Russia distribute Ukrainian channels? Can they also throw money on broadcasting?
  5. Barboskin
    Barboskin 25 March 2015 08: 03
    0
    Why cancel, let them watch, against the background of Russian television channels this will be the best campaign for the Kremlin.
  6. KOH
    KOH 25 March 2015 08: 04
    +2
    Bash on bash, Russians on the ruin, ukrovsky in Crimea, everything is logical ... lift the ban in the sense of ...
  7. 501Legion
    501Legion 25 March 2015 08: 04
    +11
    scum. in Crimea do not show Ukrainian. channels. oh trouble.
    but as in Ukraine, all Russian channels and the media are banned so nothing))
    true double standards of the rotten west
  8. Russian Uzbek
    Russian Uzbek 25 March 2015 08: 04
    +7
    "Experts will give an answer as soon as they study this topic."
    Well then, we'll talk! when we study the topic ...
  9. Arh
    Arh 25 March 2015 08: 04
    +3
    What Long Languages ​​Do American Journalists Climb Into All Holes))) laughing
  10. Funnels
    Funnels 25 March 2015 08: 05
    +3
    Let Obama demand, but we must ask. And in general there is nothing for Russian people to ** dirty their brains
  11. D_E_A_L_E_R
    D_E_A_L_E_R 25 March 2015 08: 05
    +3
    The fewer committees there are from the United States and the European Union, the more freedom of speech in the world.
  12. valokordin
    valokordin 25 March 2015 08: 06
    +1
    Crimea is Russia, if the Nazi channels are allowed, it’s strange, but if the fifties are fifties, then the broadcasting of the Russian channels in Kiev is allowed.
    1. Platonich
      Platonich 25 March 2015 08: 26
      +1
      But in Russia, some bastard allowed the broadcast of the CNN’s PIN ... channel! What is it ?!
      1. Karasik
        Karasik 25 March 2015 08: 43
        +3
        Quote: Platonitch
        But in Russia, some bastard allowed the broadcast of the CNN’s PIN ... channel! What is it ?!


        Because in Russia real freedom of speech. An adequate viewer can tell where is the truth and where is the information trash.
  13. darksoul
    darksoul 25 March 2015 08: 07
    +2
    and this is said by the creatures ... who have blocked a number of services selectively for people in Crimea, and Ukraine has banned the Russian media, it makes no sense to speak with the deaf
  14. xperia
    xperia 25 March 2015 08: 07
    +2
    And where is this union of protection when our media oppress and do everything so that they do not broadcast in the world.
  15. atamankko
    atamankko 25 March 2015 08: 08
    +2
    Again, without the stench of "exceptional"
    not done.
  16. Karabas
    Karabas 25 March 2015 08: 08
    +2
    It is necessary to pay less attention to all sorts of American committees. This committee, let it better monitor its country, rather than trying to put American law above international. It’s just that these gestures once again remind you who Ukraine is under, no more.
  17. vasiliysxx
    vasiliysxx 25 March 2015 08: 08
    +2
    Dumb mattresses, this is our territory, what we want is what we show.
  18. Pomah
    Pomah 25 March 2015 08: 09
    +3
    What kind of hearty people there in the mattress ... are worried and worried, so they probably can’t eat - they want help ... than they can ... with bombs there, rockets ...
    1. mihasik
      mihasik 25 March 2015 08: 34
      +2
      Quote: POMAH
      What kind of hearty people there in the mattress ... are worried and worried, so they probably can’t eat - they want help ... than they can ... with bombs there, rockets ...

      But besides rockets and bombs, do they still do something?)
  19. Alex_Rarog
    Alex_Rarog 25 March 2015 08: 10
    +3
    They go nefig forest to our people in the head.
    By the way, maybe they can use the 25th frame for ukrozombi? Well, I don’t believe that it’s just that you can give 40 million people a shit!
    1. Karasik
      Karasik 25 March 2015 08: 48
      +1
      Quote: Alex_Rarog
      Well, I don’t believe that you can just give 40mln people a shit in the head!

      Remember Germany 30 of the last century. But then there was not even television. Can. Everything is possible, as it is not regrettable.
  20. Dumb
    Dumb 25 March 2015 08: 13
    +1
    Suleimanov stressed that the Crimean authorities should "change the repressive policies and recognize the right of local residents to receive a wide range of news and information."

    I like it their "omnipresent existence" - have... always in one way and never
    focusing on the "freedom" of the media in the same "democratic" countries, the United States and Ukraine.
    1. mihasik
      mihasik 25 March 2015 08: 41
      +1
      I like that their "omnipresent" - must ... Always in the same vein and never focusing on the "freedom" of the media in the same "democratic" countries, the United States and Ukraine.


      For the USA, Crimea is Ukraine, so let them turn to Kiev on the issue of freedom of speech!)) Or did they still recognize Crimea as Russian?))
  21. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 25 March 2015 08: 22
    +2
    “Today’s words of Sergei Aksenov confirm our grave fears that the media climate in Crimea is deteriorating day by day”


    Well, it’s not getting into any gates. From a sick head to a healthy one. I don’t even want to comment on this nonsense.
  22. NSerzh
    NSerzh 25 March 2015 08: 26
    +2
    and Th normally settled on the tops of each his own "herd" and processed as they want through the media for example Ukraine
  23. Moore
    Moore 25 March 2015 08: 28
    +5
    Quote: Andrew Y.
    What do colleagues think about this ?:

    Somehow in my opinion is not very logical.
    1. Obama claims that he can’t stop the war (i.e., Russian nuclear weapons in the Russian Federation).
    2. His authorized persons in this matter (Cole and Heigl) block it is not clear by whom in this case the order issued (see paragraph 1) for the use of strategic nuclear forces. In fact, they should be awarded and not put in a jail.
    3. Putin and his comrades are watching this fuss with Olympic calmness (no one was translating the Strategic Missile Forces into the BR).
    Then the questions arise:
    1. Who, if not Obama, gives an order (sanction) to use strategic nuclear forces?
    2. What was the purpose of the organizers of this Armageddian? If the blow was not massive, but limited, the response from the Russian Federation could be exhaustive and leave no room for a further booth.
    Summary. I guess it's just a yellow-pressed hat.
  24. best_stas
    best_stas 25 March 2015 08: 30
    +2
    Suleymanov, go fuck! Dismiss him and let him go to his own! ... In Crimea everything is broken, he writes, let’s go go ... !!!! The prostitute is lying !!!!
  25. Tatar 174
    Tatar 174 25 March 2015 08: 30
    +2
    Lavrov is not enough for everyone to answer so that they shut up from the burning of contacts in the brain. Will and will be yapping for any reason and without reason. Maybe just ignore them?
  26. BOB044
    BOB044 25 March 2015 08: 33
    +2
    We see and hear what is beneficial to us. One word democracy is what suits us. And the American Media Rights Committee. I have to put my tongue in one place and deal with my country. But Russia is very large and not their business. How we relate to the media of other states. We decide who to listen to and who not. hi
  27. ia-ai00
    ia-ai00 25 March 2015 08: 34
    +2
    And the fact that in dill on everything connected with Russia, the Russian language, the Russian media is a ban, under pain of prison, is it NORMAL?
    Where is the "glass" of these cryopreservationists addressed to the Russians ???
  28. meriem1
    meriem1 25 March 2015 08: 35
    +2
    Quote: inkass_98
    Quote: Andrey Yurievich
    What do colleagues think about this?

    I read yesterday this heresy on another resource. Sheer conspiracy theories, "Freemasons are overthrowing Freemasons in order to put Freemasons on their revenge." For what purposes did Great Britain prepare a nuclear strike on Russia - in order to kill itself? This is not even the States, the number of survivors on the islands in the framework of a retaliatory strike will tend to statistical error.


    How to know ????? http://warfiles.ru/show-84172-nesostoyavshayasya-yadernaya-voyna-2015.html
    1. Karasik
      Karasik 25 March 2015 09: 00
      0
      Quote: meriem1
      How to know ????? http://warfiles.ru/show-84172-nesostoyavshayasya-yadernaya-voyna-2015.html

      I do not even know. The brain refuses to believe such a thing! This is not only scary, but also impractical. The end of our civilization?
      1. Kahlan amnell
        Kahlan amnell 25 March 2015 09: 43
        0
        One way or another, but the end of our civilization will certainly be. But with a plus or minus sign?
        And the "minus" is relative (again in the Stone Age) or absolute (another asteroid belt, between Venus and Mars).
        Well, if humanity begins to live not only on one planet near one star - this is a "plus".
        Yes, just do not wait for us on the stars - we are still wild, we are at war with each other, instead of joint labor. We destroy our planet. I remember the Soviet film "Through hardships to the stars", in the new version in the credits it was: "All frames of the dying planet Dessa were filmed on planet Earth." This is also a "minus" option ...
  29. Nitarius
    Nitarius 25 March 2015 08: 37
    +2
    Well, DOUBLE BITS SCREAMING ... WOULD CLOSE THE MOUTH ...
  30. Felix-A
    Felix-A 25 March 2015 08: 39
    +1
    It would be they in Kiev vparivat about inadmissibility, hypocrites ..
  31. Dreiko11
    Dreiko11 25 March 2015 08: 40
    +2
    What are you, why then when they closed the broadcasting of the Russian media in Ukraine, the Americans were pofik and then they started up. Send them .... "would deafen them three with a fiery whistle, grandmother and god into soul"
  32. Thunderbolt
    Thunderbolt 25 March 2015 08: 42
    +1
    Crimean authorities should “change repressive policies and recognize the right of local residents to receive a wide range of news and information”
    Crimean authorities flee and fall to renew Kiev nonsense on their blessed peninsula laughing How many times are there piglets of all calibers called Russian occupiers and even declared a war (a couple of times bully ) ?. There is a non-toy information war, which means that Crimea is doing everything right. During the war, the videos "Die Deutsche Wochenschau" were not played in Soviet cinemas. am And the "American organization" is better concerned with the rights of blacks --- at least some benefit will be.
  33. zulusuluz
    zulusuluz 25 March 2015 08: 48
    +2
    “Today’s words of Sergei Aksenov confirm our grave fears that the media climate in Crimea is getting worse day by day” - Only after you gentlemen ... RT should not be persecuted in the Baltic countries, EU, USA, broadcast Russian media in Ukraine. And after you, the Ukrainian media will come to Crimea.
  34. awg75
    awg75 25 March 2015 08: 52
    +1
    first, let the Russian media in Ukraine ban the ban!
  35. andreev_75
    andreev_75 25 March 2015 08: 55
    +1
    No one is fighting repressive politics in Kiev after all Russian channels have banned
  36. Leonidych
    Leonidych 25 March 2015 08: 58
    +2
    they used to say "he lies like a gray meren", now we can already say "he lies like the USA" ...
  37. Thompson
    Thompson 25 March 2015 09: 10
    +2
    cites CPJ representative for the European and Central Asian region Muzaffar Suleymanova
    I didn’t read further!
  38. GEV67
    GEV67 25 March 2015 09: 18
    +1
    Ping-sy of course "well done" with their "freedom" of speech. Although, what to take from such zhurnalyugs, they were paid here and squeal. If you have the Internet, then if you wish, you can watch TV channels both Russian and Ukrainian without problems ...
  39. Batia
    Batia 25 March 2015 09: 23
    +1
    “It is important to note that we reported back on March 14 that after March 15, 2015, Great Britain was preparing the first nuclear strike against Russia, that President Putin and the Ministry of Defense were informed about the planned nuclear attack against Russia, allowing it to prepare for this strike and to answer this blow .. "
    At first glance, some kind of crap, but I do not believe in coincidence. What was there, maybe not in this form
  40. There are a lot of us
    There are a lot of us 25 March 2015 09: 27
    +1
    Last year, all Ukrainian channels broadcasted along with Russian channels in Crimea. I think no one will ban them this year either. So the American-specific farting procedure in the puddle continues.
  41. maks197010
    maks197010 25 March 2015 09: 35
    +1
    Quote: fzr1000
    I was in the Crimea at the weekend, in Alushta. 1 + 1, Inter and some other garbage pours dirt on the Russian Federation, nothing is turned off. America, as always, is lying.

    There is no broadcasting to the Crimea, since BanderSMI did not even send an application for licensing! Do we need it ?! am
  42. MSL
    MSL 25 March 2015 09: 37
    +1
    ! The answer to the question.
    Quote: fzr1000
    I was in the Crimea at the weekend, in Alushta. 1 + 1, Inter and some other garbage pours dirt on the Russian Federation, nothing is turned off. America, as always, is lying.


    Who and what prohibits in the Crimea, the business of the Crimea.
    1. Vasilenko Vladimir
      Vasilenko Vladimir 25 March 2015 09: 50
      +1
      Quote: MSL
      Who and what prohibits in the Crimea, the business of the Crimea.

      truth for the sake of not Crimea but Russia
  43. Andchevh
    Andchevh 25 March 2015 09: 38
    +1
    Tired of all these bleating about double standards, etc.! am Russia What to expect from the enemy of the West ??? DO NOT bleat but send all these goats to w ..... pu! am
  44. Vasilenko Vladimir
    Vasilenko Vladimir 25 March 2015 09: 49
    +1
    as far as I read on the forums of Crimea UkrSMI broadcast in full and there is no ban as such, but banderlogs are doing just the opposite
  45. hhhhhhh
    hhhhhhh 25 March 2015 10: 03
    0
    Let them first ensure the broadcast of Ukrainian channels in the United States.
  46. vovan089
    vovan089 25 March 2015 10: 07
    0
    And they didn’t fail to get in here !!!
  47. Victor-M
    Victor-M 25 March 2015 10: 12
    0
    Lies have a field for maneuvers, unlike truth, as long as there is something to lie about. laughing
  48. 717
    717 25 March 2015 10: 39
    0
    yes there is no ban. they simply will not distribute the Russian budget for money, and they are not obliged. I think that cable companies will not be banned. is it only advisable from a commercial point of view? there are many more interesting foreign channels than Ukrainian
  49. Pacifist
    Pacifist 25 March 2015 10: 51
    0
    And do not go to them the forest. Although generally not a question, only subject to certain conditions:
    1. The lifting of the ban on broadcasting Russian channels in Ukraine
    2. The lifting of sanctions against Russia and the Crimea
    And broadcast to health if the content does not contradict Russian law, i.e. does not call for violence and xenophobia. It does not carry out propaganda of extremism and fascism ... etc. Given the quality of the content of today's Ukraine, if, subject to the above conditions, someone wants to pump shit into their heads, let them watch.
    And the screams of the handshake and blameless Western journalists "about freedom of speech" are of no interest to anyone. Shout about it in UkrAine ... it is more needed there.
  50. kelevra
    kelevra 25 March 2015 14: 09
    0
    Let them change something at home, but there’s nothing for us to climb on, we don’t want to listen to dill, we won’t! Or again hold a referendum on broadcasting or not ?!