Gender pension discrimination of women in the Russian Federation-2015 (Open analytical note for the Security Council of the Russian Federation)
The neo-colonial policy of the globalist corporatocracy in the face of the establishment of the United States and world financial institutions (IMF, WTO, etc. of other financial organizations), carried out in our country as a victim country, is intensifying. At the same time, Russian collaborators, who sat down in the Russian government, the State Duma and trade unions, again - and now seriously (!) - were concerned about the reduction of state social security costs for ordinary citizens. Namely, in particular, they again returned to the embodiment of the neo-colonial idea of establishing in the Russian Federation an equal age for entering into a labor retirement pension for men and women - now up to 63 years, instead of 60.
With these proposals again, 6.02.2015 was, like the hell out of the box, rushed out to the Minister of Finance of the Russian Federation Anton Siluanov, who is automatically a member of the Security Council of the Russian Federation.
At the same time, it is natural that this question will always be raised as long as the ideology of the so-called will dominate in the world and in the Russian Federation. "Free market" of capital, goods and labor of M. Friedman with his monetarism. By and large, M. Friedman received the Nobel Prize from the US Federal Reserve bankers because he gave the psychopathological ideas of radical Judaism to world usurers in their struggle for world domination to impart a secular expression. Cheating is buried in the methodology of his philosophical concept, as outlined in his work Capitalism and Freedom. Instead of the most perfect philosophical method - dialectical materialism - he applies the metaphysical method with a relativistic bias of a subjectively idealistic sense, with which it is possible not only to debilitate humanity, but also to manipulate its social consciousness. That is why diamantes from 1991 are not taught in Russian universities and transferred to the category of so-called. "Closed scientific technologies".
Before a social catastrophe, the Freedmanist-usurers financiers seek to divide society in the victim country, one might say, into its atomic social components according to the Machiavellian principle of “Divide - and rule!”. (In this case, to separate men and women.) This is done in full accordance with the doctrine of the "shock" of capitalism, the disasters of M. Friedman; “Shock”, during which they manage to accomplish in the victim state all their financial and political frauds to achieve their geopolitical goals - the establishment of world domination by usurers, along with an act of colonial genocide against the enslaved local population. And the longer the shock of the population lasts, the significant losses of the victim state.
So our Anton Siluanov in the issue of equalizing the ages of men and women when they retire on old age comes from the doctrine of M. Friedman’s “shock” adopted by the IMF, i.e. acts in the vein of the neocolonial interests of world money lenders, and not in the national interests of Russia. At the same time, his political “thoughtlessness” (or deceit?) Lies in the fact that he considers the current crisis financial situation in the Russian Federation (that is, the social “shock” in the Russian Federation of all sorts of international sanctions against it) to be quite favorable ground for finally (!), in the country, Russian lawmakers so-called “Unpopular” among the population of pro-Western usurious pension reform http://www.vestifinance.ru/articles/52993. Moreover, as he considers, the rating of the head of state - President of the Russian Federation V.V. Putin is now historically immeasurably high (somewhere around the order of 82%), and supposedly it will be scary to lower him too! The question “How bad is it to lower the VV rating? Putin as president of the Russian Federation? ”, Naturally, does not make a reservation. (And this is at a time when, according to unofficial data of a sociological survey on the Internet, immediately after AG Siluanov’s speech, up to 85% of Russians polled spoke out against equalizing the ages of men and women during their retirement from old age. However, even according to official post-Soviet data 4-year-old period - with the most aggressive (!) makivelisticheskoy propaganda in the media "for" such a proposal by the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation - this figure is lower than 58% of the respondents who did not go down.) ha VV Putin’s Russians - the Fed’s bankers are trying to change the pro-Russian “regime” V.V. Putin: remove him from power and shake the internal political situation in Russia to the "end" - that is, before the geopolitical disappearance of the country.
From these positions, the proposal to equalize the age of men and women when they retire on old age - in accordance with the requirements of the IMF - is not “unpopular”, as it is constantly voiced by the modern liberal leadership of the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation in general, namely wrecking, for the sovereignization of the Russian state. At the same time, it is enough to look at the practical results of the introduction of the same pension-reform measures carried out at the request of the IMF, for example, in the same Ukraine. There, the increase in the 2011 year of the retirement age for women in old age to the level of the retirement age for men led to the fact that in Ukraine, first of all, female unemployment immediately increased sharply, which, respectively, led to a sharp drop in women's pay in the country, the growth of women's begging among women, the growth of female prostitution and the export of young women to brothels abroad as living goods, the growth of sexually transmitted diseases of men and women in the country, the increase in the number of women with old-age pensions, etc. - http://rian.comwww.rian.com.ua/columnist/20150216/363571652.html
The situation on the labor market and in the Russian Federation will be similar, since the discrimination of women, starting from 1990, is not only acutely marked in almost the entire post-Soviet post-communist space, but in general is constantly increasing - http://www.scienceforum.ru/2014/762/5507
Besides. If the equation of the ages of men and women with their old-age retirement would be really socially fair, then, according to the liberal logic of AG Siluanova, “father of nations” I.V. Stalin, too, in the post-war crisis years of continuous economic chaos in the country and against the background of the national-patriotic enthusiasm of the Soviet people, after the USSR’s victory over Nazi Germany, could increase the calendar age for retirement for women and “equalize” women with men. However, he did not do it - even being a LEADER of a nation! Yes, and other Soviet leaders of the USSR with such proposals have never acted! Why?
V.V. Putin diplomatically invited the Russians to discuss the proposed by the Minister of Finance and a member of the Security Council of the Russian Federation A.G. Siluanov changes to the pension legislation. So let's discuss this proposal by the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation.
So, the trouble of Russia now lies in the fact that its leaders - officials of all levels - are methodologically unable to go beyond the limits of the Friedmann school of Chicago bottling. First, because they are educationally 25 years "zombie" this ideology, and secondly, because they are with it also "feed".
Therefore, there is no doubt that the proposal of A. Siluanov about equalizing the calendar ages of men and women when entering retirement pension for old age will eventually be accepted by the members of the State Duma of the Russian Federation anyway. This will mean an act of de facto gender pension discrimination of women in the Russian Federation and the strengthening of the policy of the genocide of the peoples of Russia carried out in our country.
It is noteworthy that this issue concerns them personally. Over the past decades, they themselves, like the entire political superstructure in the Russian Federation (representatives of the legislative, executive and judicial branches of government, which include oligarchs), as well as state employees - teachers and doctors (for a long time in the country as the “5 column”) By now, they have been completely withdrawn from the system of nationwide principles of both labor and pension Russian legislation. Namely, they are in comparison with the rest of the population of the country in a special way reliably and socially preferentially protected. By the year 2013, they had their own final - estate estate - labor and pension legislation, as well as their social security, which, according to benefits, are significantly different from similar civil rights and obligations of all other citizens. In other words, we are talking about the existence of double standards in labor and pension Russian legislation - contrary to the requirement of civil equality in the Constitution of the Russian Federation as the Basic Law of the country.
But to remove these privileges to the servants of the people - deputies, officials, state employees, civil servants, oligarchs, etc. - A. Siluanov is unlikely to succeed.
Let us show a literate solution to the problem of the alleged gender pension inequality between men and women in our country.
So, DANO. For the processing of public opinion with a view to adopting these pension changes with respect to the pension rights of women, the claim is applied that supposedly in modern pension legislation between women (55 years) and men (60 years) there is no constitutional “equality” in age when they retire old age. Therefore, this basic gender “equality” must be supposedly restored and the age of entering old-age pension to women should be increased to the age of entering old-age pension for men. The question arises: why not the other way around? Do not reduce the retirement age of men to the retirement age of women? Answer: women live too long compared to men! Understand this: it is necessary that non-men live longer, and that women live less! Machiavellism in the policy of genocide of the authorities in relation to the indigenous population of the country is obvious.
But what about all the same should be fair?
One can understand this not with the help of metaphysics, but with the help of diamat.
In diamat there is the concept of the “law of dialectical identity”, which takes into account the internal properties of the subject or object, namely, that they are constantly changing in time. In relation to people, he says that the same person at a given moment is not equal to himself at another time. It constantly happens internal processes: biological, mental, etc. And even more so, in terms of diamata two different people in the absolute are in no way equal to each other in their intrinsic properties. A man and a woman - all the more. On the contrary, they eventually conflict with each other.
Therefore, it is not necessary to confuse any physiological equality with equality (!) - men and women by their inner nature cannot be said. They are completely different biological and social individuals.
But modern metaphysical legislators do not want to consider and take into account the internal - biological - and social differences between a man and a woman. Those. they do not want to do analytics in the objects of their sociological research, but are immediately taken for a synthesis of the concepts of "woman" and "man" themselves. And at the same time they come to the formal-logical conclusion that the same logical scope is metaphysically common to these concepts, namely, that “woman” and “man” are “people” who are one and the same as a biological species. . Hence, a superficial conclusion is made that the calendar age for entering into a labor retirement pension for old men — both women and men — should be, in principle, without distinction, the same. However, this philosophical and methodologically limited conclusion — metaphysical evidence — is nothing more than sophistry (a conscious ploy disguised by outwardly formal logical correctness). At the same time, there are rumors in society that in Soviet times women retired, allegedly for purely social reasons, in order for grandmothers to nurse with their grandchildren. And no one remembers the main thing - about medical records! Therefore, social justice in this matter is at the mercy of subjectivism and hangs in the balance.
The objective, socially just solution of this question is achieved as a result of the application of the dialectical materialist method. At the same time, unlike metaphysics, the basic social equality between a woman and a man must be sought, as is dialectical equality between them. Then the analyst of the logical concepts of "woman" and "man" is done first. At the same time, the content of concepts is decomposed into smaller indicators, moreover, in relation to the realities of life, i.e. in relation to materialism. And then among them there is an absolutely common internal indicator for the concept of "woman" and "man", which characterizes the biological aging of the body of both women and men. This indicator determines the dialectic synthesis between them in terms of social justice.
As a result, we obtain that the general dialectic indicator of biological aging in women and men is a menopause. In women, it occurs at the age of 45 ÷ 50 years, in men - at the age of 50 ÷ 55 years. It is these very 5 years in the Soviet pension legislation that objectively determined the difference between the existing age for retirement pension for women (55 years) and men (60 years).
By the way, now - in 2013 - Russian doctors have already reduced the average maximum menopausal period for Russian women from 50 to 49, which in itself speaks volumes about the negative developments in our country over the last 25 years. Stress, environmental degradation, poor and poor quality nutrition, etc. For the future demographics in the country, the decline in this indicator sets bad forecasts for the future.
Why do women and men have different periods of menopause? Because in men, a complete change of blood during life occurs on average 1 times in 4 years, and in women - 1 times in 3 years (especially in the childbearing period due to monthly menstrual bleeding). Therefore, the female body under normal conditions of life physiologically ages faster than the male. Indeed, physicians are well aware that it is impossible to take blood from regular donors every month. In this case, the body of donors will not have time to recover fully - it is aging biologically.
Thus, the dialectical calculation shows that genuine socially just equality between men and women in determining their calendar age for access to old-age retirement pension as a fundamental — basic — legislative dimension is determined in sociology not by some lengthy subjective talk about that a woman allegedly retires before a man on 5 years due to the fact that she has to stay at home and nurse grandchildren, etc .; and according to a completely objective maximum medical borderline indicator of biological aging for both sexes in general, with the addition of additional 5 years to it. Namely.
For women: 50 + 5 = 55 (years). And for men: 55 + 5 = 60 (years).
And it is this difference in 5 years that has been and will be correct, scientifically sound and socially fair.
Climax is climax - in both men and women. Fertility functions during this period cease, the body is physiologically rebuilt into old age. This changes the work of the entire endocrine system, the circulatory system, changes the composition of bones, the work of internal organs, etc. No plastic cosmetic surgery to rejuvenate nature will not deceive. After menopause, a woman still does not become pregnant and does not give birth, and it is more difficult for a man to become a father.
If a woman is added to the maximum climacteric age (50 years) before retirement she has 10 years (instead of 5 years), and a man has only 5 years; then we get the actual DISCRIMINATION of women compared to men in the area of compliance with their true gender - that is, biological - equality. This means that, in comparison with a man, a woman will be exploited by society to an older biological age than a man. At the same time, instead of taking care of labor protection and healthy lifestyles of our men, who have a larger reserve of youth and, accordingly, longevity, laid by nature more than women - 55 years, respectively, against 50 years - (see menopause), it is to reduce the longevity of women. At the same time, the number of indigenous women will be reduced - and, above all, among female workers in the sphere of material production and those who have 40-hour working week and annual leave in 28 slave. days In other words, we are talking about a separate gender pensionable GENOCIDE for women, as the gender part of the entire population of the country. In other words, those in power and managers-owners, changing nothing in the country to ensure normal social conditions to increase the actual longevity of Russian men (providing all Russians with work, decent wages and decent quality of life, etc.), decided to continue to “drive into Paradise ", now sitting down on the Russian Indian hump.
Indeed, more women are born in the Russian Federation than women, however, from the age of 20, a mortal decline in their numbers begins, and in 30-35 years old the so-called demographic “gender cross” (see 2012 statistics http://www.gks.ru/bgd/regl/b13_111/Main.htm), after which the female population begins to gradually exceed the male one. And this despite the fact that, from a biological point of view, the stock of longevity and youth in men is, on average, laid down by nature more than in women. This “gender cross” in time does not stand still, but moves up and down the age scale, depending on the nature historical socio-political situation both in the country and in the world as a whole. For example, during the war it falls down to a younger age (then there are more women than men among old-age pensioners than men), and in economically prosperous periods of history it slowly rises. His position is not only one of the most important indicators of the country's real social well-being in the current period, but also an indicator of the quality of managing or manipulating society. First of all, the position of the “gender cross” on the age scale allows managers to predict the future gender of old-age pensioners and the average life expectancy of both men and women for several decades ahead - and, accordingly, take proactive measures of social impact on future demographic development indicators population in the country.
And both in a positive and in a negative direction. For example, in the negative case: when implementing a foreign strategy of passive aggression against the victim country, namely, to reduce the number of the indigenous population of the victim country in the near future, the internal enemies of Russia, i.e. for Freedman-managers of all levels, it’s enough, without doing anything in the country to improve the real socialization of indigenous men, to lime at the moment the number of indigenous young women - if not on a par with young men, then at least that. The “gender cross” as an indicator of improving life in the country also rises, to higher ages, but not at the expense of improving the life of the population, but at the expense of unbalancing social justice in the country and reducing the number of the female population in general. His position on the age scale will already work on fraud for the population and on the Machiavellianism of the country's leaders in the collaborationist management of society. And for this, all that is necessary is Machiavellianism - under the pretext of the alleged need for a democratic “restoration” of constitutional equality between Russian men and women in the spirit of the so-called. pro-Western "universal values" - to metaphysically balance the calendar (rather than biological) age of retirement for old age for men and women.
The effect will be visible already through 3-4, as in Ukraine. And if this also prohibits Russian women from doing free abortions so that deprived Russian women can do abortions for themselves, that is, with their own hands, grandmother's methods and in unsanitary conditions - and they went straight to the “other world” —that even faster! Historical medical practice in this regard is also abundant in such cases.
It is easy to destroy the equality of citizens - later it will be difficult to restore social justice in the law. This will require the creation of a corresponding feminist movement of Russian women for the true equality of their rights as compared with men in the Russian Federation. However, as historical world practice shows, any independent opposition movement (including the feminist movement) in various countries is ultimately “privatized” by globalists with the goal of: 1) or its political degeneration, 2) or to further enhance personal control over members governments and other authorities of a particular national state for their subsequent collaborativeization — in the interests of the globalization of corporattocracy represented by the US establishment international financial institutions (IMF, WTO and other financial institutions, etc.). Simply put, to colonize the country. Russia will not be an exception.
It is objected that, supposedly, in all of Europe women are now retiring in old age at the same age as men. Well, first of all, almost all of Europe is already under the heel of the US Federal Reserve bankers, and difficult times are also coming in Europe. And secondly, not a single sensible people, including men, sooner or later allow a policy of genocide against their women. For there are no women - and no people! Therefore, everything that leads to the growth of national self-consciousness on the principle “Save yourself, who can!” Leads to the growth of national separatism in a multi-ethnic country, the growth of ethnic conflicts, civil war and geopolitical disintegration of the entire state. Russia will not be an exception.
Thus, in connection with the above, the proposal of the Minister of Finance of the Russian Federation, as well as a member of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, Anton Seluanov, about equalizing the calendar ages of men and women when they leave for an old age retirement pension is scientifically untenable, erroneous, economically and economically unjustified representing a threat to the national security of Russia! It is necessary once and for all to stop raising this issue as profaning and provocative, directed against the sovereignty of Russia.
Russian men and women should unite and speak with one voice against such a policy of the authorities in the pension legislation and achieve its abolition.
Information